Page is under updating latest 07-07-2020. Read in English further down.
Kunde skriver gentagende til ledelsen CEO #AndersDam hvis det er en fejl så indrøm og sig undskyld, det er da ikke så svært.
Hvis Jyske Bank tør at at svare på trustpilot anmeldelsen her, og for engangs skyld
Hvorfor vil politiet ikke efterforske kriminelle banker.
Beviserne er meget klare for Jyske Banks brug af Svig.
HVOR MANGE BEVISER SKAL I HAVE !
Når Statsadvokaten nægter at lade Jyske bank og deres advokater og ansatte efterforske. Og skriver at anmælder må selv fører sine påstande cevilretligt. SE Bilag 198.
For så at opdage at Jyske Bank A/S også vælger at købe anmeldelser advokat, velvidende at det danske politi ikke må efterforske danske bankers overtrædelser af straffeloven.
Kære Politi og Statsadvokat.
Lyt nu til de 4 samtaler her, og sammenlign det som sagsøger siger til de ansatte i Lundgrens advokater.
Med det Lundgrens selv fremlægger 02-09-2019. Bilag 134. som Lundgrens nægtede at dele en kopi af til klienten. Se Bilag 138.
Det kræver ikke den store eksamen at hører hvad Carsten siger og som både Mette og Emil bekrafter.
Og det er ikke det som Emil Hald Winstrøm fremlægger 2. september 2019. i øvrigt uden klientens godkendelse.
Dette er en advarsel imod Lundgrens advokater for at manipulere deres klienter.
Og samtidig være betalt af Jyske Bank A/S for ikke at fremlægge deres klients påstande mod Jyske bank A/S
Vi ønsker dialog og gennemgang af vores sag, og beviser imod #Jyskebank koncernen, for at udsætte os kunder for bevidst bedrageri.
Kunde skriver gentagende gange til ledelsen og CEO #AndersDam hvis det er en fejl så indrøm og sig undskyld.
Hvis ledelse i Jyske Bank som siden siden maj 2016. har valgt at dækket over bankens bedrageri, giver kunde ret, bør ledelsen i Jyske bank gå af.
Ethvert medlem der ikke længere ønsker at støtte Jyske banks bedrageri i mod lille bank kunde.
Kan sætte deres mandat frit, hvilken kunden da også skrev til bestyrelsen i 2018.
Men bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank må have ment at have styr på sagen, efter som Jyske Bank´s Ledelse har købt Lundgrens advokater, som jo var kundens advokater.
Således var kunden reelt uden advokat, da Lundgrens fik millioner for at hjælpe Jyske Bank A/S.
Mod at Lundgrens ikke frem lagde klientens påstande for retten. som er Bilag 153. og Bilag 204.
Men i stedet fremlage de påstande, som må være en aftale mellem Jyske Bank og Lundgrens advokater, du kan læse dem på Bilag 134. date 02-09-2019.
Lundgrens nægtede efterfølgende at dele disse af Lundgrens fremlagte Bilag 134. påstande med klienten, som Bilag 138. udmærket understøtter. date. 05-09-20199.
Klienten spørger Lundgrens 20. september 2019. om de arbejder for Jyske Bank A/S ved Bilag 140. og Bilag 141.
Lundgrens nægter at svare, på så direkte spørgsmål.
Det har ikke haft nogen indflydelse på sammen arbejdet mellem Jyske Bank A/S og Lundgrens Advokater, som lundgrens advokater har formået at holde skjult overfor deres klient frem til klienten selv 21 september 2019. finder bevis for ved Bilag 12.
Eftersom Lundgrens advokater nægter svare på om de har et samarbejde med Jyske Bank A/S
Vælger klienten at sparke Lundgrens i rumpen og fyrer dem, sendt kl. 20.58 den 24. september. ved Bilag 142. og Bilag 143.
Efter Lundgrens er blevet fyret, efter mistanke om at være korrupte og betalt af Jyske bank for ikke at fremlægge klientens sag mod Jyske Bank.
Svare Partner Dan Terkildsen ved 25-09-2019 ved Bilag 144.
Men efter som Lundgrens mener de skal have 232.000 dkk. for ikke at fremlægge klientens sag for retten.
Bliver det nødvendig at klage over Lundgrens og deres advokater, der er i sadeleshed klaget over Dan Terkildsen.
Men der er flere ind blandet fra advokatfirmaet Lundgrens, du kan læse klagen her Bilag 233. her kommer der link til nævnte Bilag.
Kunde beder stadig ledelsen i Jyske bank om at rette deres små fejl.
Og indrømme at forbrydelser ikke altid betaler sig.
Men ledelsen og deres advokater syntes ikke at bekymmer sig om, alle aktie ejer i Jyske bank A/S har samme holdning som bestyrelsen til at benytte sig af dokumentfalsk og bedrageri “svig og falsk”
Mens de små kunder forsøger at råbe Jyske banks ledelse op.
Warning against Danish banks like Jyske Bank, when they can deceive us, they can also deceive you.
Du tror nok dette er her ikke finder sted i danmark.
At store banker, som Jyske Bank A/S der blev støttet af den danske stat med 4 hjælpepakker.
Takker staten ved udsætte kunder for helt bevidst bedrageri, støttet af CEO Anders Dam.
Ledelsen og CEO Anders Dam har mindst siden maj 2016, været bevidst om at kunde i Jyske Bank var udsat for svindel.
Alligevel har Anders Dam, Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager advokater, nægtet enhver form for dialog med den lidt små sure kunde, for helvede man bliver trat !.
Hør de foreløbige delte samtaler mellem Lundgrens advokater, som Mette Marie Nielsen og Emil Hald Winstrøm og Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup.
Og forklar så
Hvorfor Jyske Bank A/S valgte at ansætte Lundgrens advokater, som efterfølgende valgte at maniplulerede deres klient, og dirækte imod klienten og klager, fremlagde noget andet end det klienten sagde og skrev.
SIDEN HER ER VORES DAGBOG.
Hvor vores kamp for retfærdighed er beskrevet.
Når kunde påstår at Jyske Bank A/S står bag både udnyttelse / dokumentfalsk / bedrageri.
Og med stor sandsynlighed sikkert også står bag bestikkelse, af kundens tidliger advokat Lundgrens advokater.
Hvilket var for at Lundgrens ikke måtte fremlægge Jyske Banks kundes påstande, i mod Jyske bank A/S
for blandt andet brug af svig og falsk.
Hvis Jyske banks ledelse har en anden forklaring på at Lundgrens advokater ikke har fremlagt deres klients sag imod Jyske Bank A/S for brug af svig og falsk.
End den påstand den tidligere klient i Lundgrens advokater har fremlagt i sin klage mod Lundgrens Bilag 233. som er delt med ledelsen i Jyske Bank, så ville dialog kunne hjælpe.
Kære Jyske Bank A/S og CEO Anders Dam
Dette her er et opråb til dialog.
HJÆLP OS NU
Spørg i Jyske Bank om der er noget af det, vi her skriver som er opspind, eller om Jyske Bank A/S laver det som kunde har fremlagt i Bilag 153. og Bilag 204. og Bilag 233. som brug af udnyttelse, svig, falsk og brug af returkommission.
Deler det på forsiden her af free6. ny-bank. bank-nyt. tyv. domhuset. tyve. retten. tvnu. domhus. politimand. forbryder. bombe. i håb om at Jyske Bank ser at vi forsøger at få dem i tale.
DET ER JYSKE BANK DER ØNSKER SAGEN IKKE OS.
Dette siger og skriver vi konstant, hvilket delte samtaler også bekrafter.
Vi synes ikke denne her måde at drive bank, lever op til reglerne om bankdrift i danmark, men Jyske Bank er ligeglade med alle regler og love.
Deres magtfulde venner holder hånden over ledelsen i Jyske Bank.
Nu beder vi bare om at vi får en snarlig hovedforhandling og har anmodet Jyske Bank om ikke at trække sagen yderliger.
In Denmark the police seems to support the Danish criminal banks, so there is no help to receive.
It appeared to be politically determined not to investigate the Danish banks for crime, a police officer have told it, to the plaintiff.
Read the prosecutor against Jyske Bank A/S that was presented to the court on 4 May 2020. Procedure 3
And also read the resubmitted provisional Prosesskrift 3. from 28-10-2019. which Jyske Bank could not understand.
Now 4. May 2020. as Appendix 169. “and is Appendix 153. in the Appendix 233. in the complaint against Lundgrens Lawyers.
Hear how the client has to contend with Lundgrens, og listen to telephone conversations with Lundgrens here.
And understand how deeply manipulative Lundgren’s lawyers have appeared to their client.
Lundgrens forgot to disclose about their cooperation with Jyske Bank A/S to help Jyske Bank disappoint in legal matters.
That Lundgrens lawyers actually work for the counterparty Jyske Bank A/S Appendix 12.
Is a huge problem, especially when Lundgren’s manipulate with the client’s claims.
These conversations are written off and presented to the legal community.
BILAG 87.A. MP3. 14-12-18 samtale med Mette Marie Nielsen Lundgrens.
Bilag 87.A. MP3. 14-12-18 Mette Lundgrens advokater siger der er styr på bilag fredag kl. 14.59. VI SKAL STOLE PÅ LUNDGRENS
Could as well have asked CEO Anderes Dam if he would lead our case against Jyske Bank for the use of fraud.
Then Jyske Bank would not have had to bribe Lundgrens, or what Jyske Bank would call it.
BILAG 91.A. MP3. 18-12-18 samtale med Mette Marie Nielsen Lundgrens
When Mette Marie manipulates and, say an agreement from 15-07-2008 is closes the day after 16-07-2008. but it is not true.
Now look at the 2 documents and dates, and understand that Annex E. page 4. closes 30-12-2008 and not 16-07-2008.
When Mette Marie Nielsen acts as a lawyer and chooses to cover Jyske Bank’s forgery for Lundgren’s lawyers, that’s a problem.
It is also these agreements that Jyske Bank has disposed of, which is illegal.
Don`t Jyske Bank hired Lundgren’s lawyers to help, conceal this from the court by manipulating the client.
Who Jyske Bank A/S employed Lundgrens to file a lawsuit against Jyske bank for multiple fraud allegations and False.
And ask yourself how much has Jyske Bank A/S paid Lundgrens to acting so stupid.
Bilag 91.A. MP3. 18-12-2018. kl. 17.41 Mette Marie lundgrens RINGER. Mette Marie og Dan mener at fremlægge svig, skader sag
How Lundgrens can take on a fraud case against Jyske Bank
And at the same time take up employment in Jyske bank is a riddle for the plaintiff and complaints against Lundgren’s lawyers.
Hear how Mette Marie Nielsen for Lundgren’s lawyers continues to manipulate the client, to divert complaints from the allegations of fraud, and keep in mind that Lundgrens already receives millions to help Jyske bank.
BILAG 92.A. MP3. 22-03-19 samtale med Emil Hald Winstrøm Lundgrens
Bilag 92.A MP3. 22-03-2019. 14.51 Emil Hald Lungrens bekrafter der er 9. vidner, og at alle bilag medtages. læs Bilag 62. 63. 135.
BILAG 93.A. part. 1. MP3. 08-07-19 samtale med Emil Hald Winstrøm Lundgrens
BILAG 93.A. DEL 1. MP3. 08-07-2019. SAMTALE EMIL LUNDGRENS OG KLIENTEN EMIL BEKRAFTER DET HANDLER OM SVIG. BEKRAFTER IGEN 9 VIDNER
BILAG 93.B. part. 2. MP3. 08-07-19 samtale med Emil Hald Winstrøm Lundgrens
BILAG 93.B. DEL 2. MP3. 08-07-2019. SAMTALE EMIL LUNDGRENS OG KLIENTEN EMIL BEKRAFTER DET HANDLER OM SVIG. BEKRAFTER IGEN 9 VIDNER
Listen to what Lundgrens confirms, that the wants to present the court, on the second of September.
Emil Hald Winstrøm says it is Dan Terkildsen ther is in control of the case.
And compare with what Lundgrens presented to the court on September 2, 2019. Appendix 134.
And before that December 18, 2018. Appendix 47.
And that Lundgren’s lawyers would not share with their client. September 5. tries to get Dan Terkildsen to hand over a copy.
Dan Terkildsen does not answer the request Appendix 138.
We are awaiting the board to answer our lawyer. 19 July 2020. after the danish bank Jyske bank asked the court for an additional 6 weeks deadline
To answer charges against the bank for use of fraud, exploitation, document forgery.
It is no fun being exposed to fraud, and when the Danish police say it is all right, and it has to be the clients themselves that must fight the danish bank, to stop their scams, by their lawyers.
Meanwhile the Danish bank Jyske Bank, apparently has bribed the customers lawyer “Lundgrens” by partner Dan Terkildsen not to bring the clients case to court.
But we do not give up, even if it is a giant criminal organization, that uses criminal activities, to disappoint in legal matters, and who also deliberatelt lie to the court.
Free coffee at Jyske Bank, IT’S FOR FUN
Will you want to help us, so that the Danish Bank like here Jyske Bank A/S can realize.
And make the Denmark’s second largest bank, stop exposing their customers to Fraud and False.
The management of Jyske Bank, including CEO Anders Christian Dam, is stunned to care what the customers of Jyske Bank do.
As long as the bank can continue their deliberate fraud against their customers.
Læs og hør optagelser mellem ansatte i det korrupte advokatfirma og klienten.
I så fald Lundgrens advokater, ikke mener deres advokat firma er blevet bestukket af Jyske Bank A/S.
Imødes en god forklaring.
Men læs nu klagen først.
Klagen er velbegrundet og viser tydelig tegn på jyske banks brug af bestikkelse, for at skuffe i retsforhold.
Listen to conversations between Lundgrens and their client, and read the complaint against Lundgrens by Dan Terkildsen attorneys
Read the complaint Appendix 233. Klagen. / Appendix List 1 – 239. Bilag til klage.
To understand how corruption and bribery are a major problem in Denmark.
Bribery to cover criminal activity in Jyske Bank A/S which the board is standing behind still continuing.
And hear conversations between Lundgrens and the client while reading transcripts of conversations.
Help us to stop Jyske Bank’s fraud against the bank’s customers
Follow the little man’s fight against the Danish fraud bank.
Well assisted by Lundgrens and Lund Elmer Sandager attorneys.
When Jyske Bank’s group management sees nothing wrong in making a document false or fraudulent, use a return commission or that Jyske Bank’s board members lie to the court.
Is there something wrong with the board.
Or does the law just not apply to the Danish banks.
Just asks the kings of the Jyske Bank
We would like to talk to you about this scam, are you afraid to apologize for fraud, and think it is best to keep doing fraud.
Anders Christian Dam 89 89 20 01
Niels Erik Jakobsen 89 89 20 03
Per Skovhus 89 89 20 04
Peter Schleidt 89 89 20 03
Why do you keep laughing at us, instead of calling, is it so difficult to understand.
You come pretty far with concessions and apologies.
We have written many times, to the management that if there something the Bank does not agree with, then they should just call 22227713 so we can meet.
And together go through what not can be true, then we should fix it right away.
And we do it with a smile, and apologize for that.
Will Jyske Bank doing the same thing.
Only with a delay of between 4 and 12 years.
It is for you in the leadership, shouldn’t we talk about it.
The Skaarup family from Hornbæk
Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek. phone +45 22227713
Jyske bank Havkatten, wrote before blocking us on Facebook and tweets that you come the longest with dialogue.
Just like Jyske bank wrote You can be sure that a judge will look at the documents.
The evidence like that is the law fortunately furnished. Afterwards, Jyske bank paid our lawyers not to present our evidence to the court.
Really well bribery done. See Appendix 12.
The customer wrote to you and the management 24-06-2020
and asked you not to continue to deceive your customer, but you did not care.
Despite at least since May 2016, Jyske Bank has been aware that Jyske Bank is exposing your customers to fraud.
Ask the board Jyske Bank here, why they are continuing to do fraud against their customers, now that it has been discovered and has been presented it to the court see Appendix 153. and Appendix 204.
The little man against a Greek man with money power who seemed to be able to use to bribe the little man’s lawyer, to go against his own client, while Jyske Bank pumps millions into the law firm.
A page about bribery in Denmark and the Danish banks’ criminality against their customers.
Now it seems that Jyske Bank A/S In addition to the use of fraud exploitation and forgery also uses bribery, and our former lawyers Lundgrens is the recipient of a return commission.
Maybe Lundgrens will explain it to you.
complaint is shared with CEO Anders Dam
And the management of Jyske Bank.
You can read and hear conversations between complaints and Lundgrens as well as Rødsten’s lawyers.
Hear how they try to manipulate their client.
You can also find links to several appendices, in the complaint against Lundgren’s attorneys.
As well Process Letter 3. against Jyske Bank A/S for millions fraud.
The little Dane who fights against a large criminal Danish organization consisting of Jyske Bank submits with their new lawyer on Monday 27 April 2020 a defense against the Jyske Bank group for fake and fraud.
And at the same time works on the complaint against Lundgren’s lawyers, in the saddle over lawyer Dan Terkildsen, which will be presented as an annex to the case.
It is about that at least since May 2016, the top management of Jyske Bank has been aware that Jyske Bank has deceived their customer, and has allowed it to continue.
It is not unknown to the senior members of Jyske Bank A/S
Lundgren’s lawyers admit by phone that the client is probably exposed to fraud and fraud but will not submit it.
Read conversations and be proven that Lundgren’s lawyers really cover Jyske Bank for making false documents
14-12-2018 and 18-12-2018 at dannish here. click on date
The next talks are 22-03-2019 and 08-07-2019.
THE MESSAGE IS STILL ONLY TO GET INTO DIALOGUE
Regardless, Jyske Bank claims to comply with all laws and regulations.
However, we do not agree with the group.
No matter what mighty friends will know to cover that Jyske Bank exposes us to continued fraud.
Contact information on those at Jyske Bank Group Management who know about Jyske Bank’s fraud operations without stopping them.
And you can laugh at the stupid customers in Jyske Bank A/S
who do not understand why the group does not customers for words such as customer service, honesty, trustworthy, reasonable.
It is not unknown to the senior members of Jyske Bank A/S that there are customers who are exposed to proven fraud.
And this is supported by the entire group together.
Still, all members are struggling to run fair banking, by not admitting that the group is doing fraud and fake.
Call +4522227713 if there is one or a few misunderstandings so we can correct this.
The last thing we want is a lawsuit, which we wrote a long time before, we discovered that Jyske Bank A/S doing fraud, read 28-10-2019.
Lundgrens law firm is at risk to legal certainty in Denmark.
Therefore, former client, complaining about Lundgren’s attorneys, for appearing sordid and by no LOYALT to their client, surely after the Defendant initiated their million co-operation, with Plaintiff’s attorney Lundgren’s attorneys.
Partner Dan Terkildsen writes it is conspiracy theories.
When Lundgrens sends bills for almost 200,000 dkk. for failing to submit any of the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank’s group for forgery. “document false” and among other things like fraud.
And at the same time, having removed some of the client’s transferred money from the client account.
That indicates Lundgren’s attorneys have wanted to help Jyske Bank’s board to ruin the client.
While Jyske Bank A/S at the same time continues the bank’s fraud, with a view to undermining the client’s finances, and that the client can not afford a new lawyer, to put an end to Jyske Bank’s continued fraud crimes against the bank’s own customers.
And getting help from the client’s lawyer, the client says it’s like being in a bad movie.
Part of the Client’s transferred money to Lundgrens disappeared.
If in Denmark you are exposed to what looks like organized crime, how large Danish banks are involved.
And you are asking the police, as well as the Danish authorities to help you.
Then you will find that you are very alone.
No one will help you.
You might explain why Nykredit, we first had to sue Nykredit, before Nykredit’s lawyer Mette Egholm Nielsen 18-10-2016
would answer the question, if we in Nykredit have taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000
And when we should “Appendix D.” have rescheduled this loan, which Jyske Bank has informed their customer “Appendix 29.”
The answer from Nykredit was that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit. “Appendix 30. Case”
So it is simple Jyske Bank is lying and that of doing Jyske Bank Fraud.
This seemed to be Jyske Bank’s collaborative partner from Lundgrens, not to be included in their case against Jyske Bank, which Lundgrens managed bypassing their client’s otherwise very clear instructions
And you’re the little against apparently politically system.
Where the elite cover the elite so that they can remain in power.
In our case they seemed to use all tricks, and as in our case now also seemed to have bribes thriving quite well.
And the only thing we have tried is to get a meeting with Jyske Bank’s top management, to get some help here.
In the time the case has been in the City Court started in 2015.
We have only now, got a reputable lawyer who will help us, and present our case.
As we have since April 2016. After we discovered that Jyske Bank was probably a criminal and subjected to a huge fraud, our lawyer asked to file the case and to present our fraud allegations.
The case is now also about Lundgren’s Attorneys have been corrupt since they have not submitted any of our allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for False and Fraud, see more on the blog.
Now, we just want Jyske Bank Group management to admit that the bank is exposing us to fraud.
It shouldn’t be that hard to understand.
Can the Board of Directors of Jyske Bank’s organization, new and outgoing in the Jyske Bank A/S Group.
Say that they have no responsibility for exposing the customer to fraud crimes, when the client repeatedly asked the entire Board not to. read letters to the board member.
When partner Dan Terkildsen on August 13, 2019 told that Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has no responsibility, when Lundgrens has now clearly incurred a major conflict of interest, since the millions must have trundled into Lungren’s account from Jyske Bank A/S
Here at the top is the Chairman of Jyske Bank A/S
CEO Anders Christian Dam, and below we have the next chairman of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors Kurt Bligaard Pedersen.
2 very powerful people, in the Danish industry.
None of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors have wanted any form of dialogue, or have Jyske Bank stop deceiving us.
While we fix the bank news.
If we move the many sub-pages to the block, this is done to tell you more about the many different criminal conditions, where the Jyske Bank Group very clearly violates the Criminal Code, and thus is to be described as criminal.
And individually we will review and explain on the pages, each one of Jyske Bank’s many violations of the penal code provisions, and document them with 1st conditions on each page.
As well as making a page. With our total allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, and insert the said attachments, where they are mentioned in the closing reply letter from 28-10-2019.
The customer accuses Jyske Bank’s group management, in association, to stand behind, the bank’s continued fraud against Jyske Bank’s own customer.
This will be the case with the Danish authorities, which the police do not control, which is why Danish bank customers, in fact, stand alone against the largest and most powerful, apparently criminal organizations in Denmark.
There will also be audio clips shared with the client’s former attorneys, so you can hear both.
Law firm Rödstenen. Dalgas Ave 42, 8000 Aarhus +4586121999
Lundgrens Advokat partner company. Tuborg Boulevard 12. DK-2900 Hellerup +4535252535
In the shared recorded conversations, you will hear both Lundgrens and Rödstenen employees, even very clearly, and may be clearly informed by telephone.
Partly the client’s many repetitive allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, but not least emphasizes the seriousness of the case, where the client repeatedly, says that it is a fraud and false case.
Which most recently Lundgren’s staff, attorney Emil Hald Winstrøm in all telephone conversations has been disclosed.
Emil Hald Winstrøm confirms by telephone, that he has understood. that this is a fraud case.
Nevertheless, on behalf of partner Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren’s attorneys on September 2, 2019, Emil Hald Winstrøm presents the case to the court, without including any of the client’s claims.
And without sharing Lundgren’s claim document with the client.
Although Lundgren’s lawyer, and partner Dan Terkildsen is subsequently sued for a copy of their own claim document from 2 September 2019.
(Since it has nothing to do with the client’s claims.)
Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen choose again not to share court documents, with their client.
We will continually, share a lot where we can clearly prove, that several Lundgren’s attorneys must have planned, not to submit their client’s claims.
The client has really been without a lawyer since February 5, 2018
Use the link And and read the letter 25-09-2019 at the bottom of the page
This case clearly shows how some of Denmark’s biggest lawyers, by their actions, are a serious threat to legal certainty.
The case here is a terrible example of how Danish lawyers, like here the plaintiffs’ lawyers Lundgrens have really, counteracted their client.
At the same time that Plaintiff’s Attorneys really worked for Defendants in the case, removing Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants.
As here in the case where plaintiff’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S were not presented to the court.
Plaintiff’s attorney here Lundgrens, in this way, has shown that the law firm, in fact, has work to disappoint in legal matters, by going directly against the client’s instructions.
As Lundgrens Advokater chooses not only to work against their client, but also chose to pursue another case against Jyske Bank A/S.
Than the case against Jyske Bank for fraud as the client February 5, 2018, transferred to Lundgren’s lawyers.
Lundgren’s Attorneys have harmed the confidence of the Danish lawyers, by unethical, dishonesty and possibly by violations of the law, made every effort to prevent their client’s claims from being brought to court.
Can clients in the large law firms soon rely on the lawyers they employ if Jyske Bank A/S may pay Lundgrens, or otherwise have caused Lundgrens to do the exact opposite of what their client has 100 times said and written to be presented.
What do we have to do with great Danish lawyers like Lundgren’s Lawyers.
The case here is about the big Danish lawyer’s houses really to be trusted.
We can prove that several of those employed in Lundgrens, have proven to work against the client, rather than working for the client.
One thing here is that the client wants Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank A/S, to stop the bank’s fraud against the customer.
This they asked Lundgrens to help them with, instead Lundgrens is employed by Jyske Bank, and what happened then ?.
The client believes that the Jyske Bank groups have paid Lundgrens for not submitting their client claims to the court.
This is a serious problem for all Danes
And if the same lawyers as here Lundgrens, has clients in the US., ENGLAND, RUSSIA, CHINA, JAPAN, GERMANY Can these clients also get into the same problems as us?
When Danish clients obviously can’t trust big Danish lawyer houses like Lundgrens.
Then Lundgrens becomes a major threat to legal certainty.
If you cannot trust the lawyer you hire will be loyal to you, as their client, this is a grave problem.
Lundgrens chose not to answer their client, or to share court documents with the client, which does not look good.
Here you can on 2 annexes, 1 and 2 September 2019.
By self-examination you find that Lundgren’s lawyers, completely consciously and in bad faith, directly against the client’s instructions, do the exact opposite of what the client repeated since February 2018. Lundgrens has to present in the district court.
Her kan du på 2 bilag, den 1 og 2. September 2019.
Ved selvsyn konstatere at Lundgrens advokater, helt bevidst og i ond tro, direkte imod kundens instrukser, gør det absolutte modsatte af, det klienten gentagne siden februar 2018. har sagt Lundgrens skal fremlægge i byretten.
Read about Danske Bank’s million fraud against a customer, here carried out by Jyske Bank A/S and well assisted by the bank’s board and Lund Elmer Sandager. Lundgren’s lawyers who chose instead to counter the client’s claims against Jyske Bank was not presented, the customer Therefore has had to submit their claims themselves for the court.
It’s pretty funny. Here you only get 2 dates that show that Lundgrens is a rotten lawyer Corporation
January 8 and 9, 2019 September 1 and 2, 2019.
Lundgrens does not share the court’s information Lundgrens does not write the client’s witnesses on litigation 2.
Nor does Lundgrens share the litigation with the client
Appendices and letters are inserted in a timeline, and a page is created for those who have helped not stop Jyske Bank’s fraud
We move the list below pages into the blog so that the page gets cluttered
Donation to lawyer assistance against Jyske bank A/S for gross fraud
carried out and continued by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors since May 2016
in association. received
Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.
It is a great thing for legal certainty in Denmark that a Danish bank is allowed by the police to commit crime. Or does the new chief of police or the Minister of Justice have a good explanation, no politicians or authorities will help stop Jyske Bank’s fraud charges against us customers.
ER LUNDGRENS KORUPTE
Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt and is the Danske Bank Jyske bank fraudulent.
Read with and judge if these are Conspiracy theories as Partner Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren’s lawyer partner company claims.
Please read some of the many letters we have sent to Lundgrens, the court and Rørdtenen attorneys since 2016, to present our claims against JYSKE BANK FOR FRAUD AND FALSE.
If you have any questions then call +4522227713
best regards The Skaarup family from Hornbaek
Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbark
Main hearing in large fraud case against Jyske Bank 30th of September & October 1 is listed after apparent problems with a corrupt lawyer
Who only 30 daysand 2 hours, before the main hearing, the court submits the client’s evidence of fraud, and to file client claims.
Or to share the case with the client, need to see a few letters to Lundgren’s lawyers, then you will understand that they are probably corrupt
A fraud case that ends up being about bribery in some of Denmark’s largest law firms and Danish banks.
If CEO Ander Christian Dam has another explanation, our number is +4522227713
And wants Jyske Bank’s group management to admit that we are exposed to fraud, and the Board has been aware of this fraud and false at least since May 2016.
Now, we just want Jyske Bank Group management to admit that the bank is exposing us to fraud.
And then stop deceiving us.
The fact that Jyske Bank has paid our earlier, lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers to withhold our claims against Jyske Bank A/S to disappoint in legal matters, is disgusting banking business.
If Lundgrens does not believe they have countered the client’s allegations in being presented to the court.
Or if Lundgrens has not worked for Jyske Bank A/S.
Then we receive your “Lundgrens” explanation on phone +4522227713.
Since the Danish police will not investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, we also do not think the police will investigate whether Jyske Bank A/S has paid Lundgrens bribery, hidden as a return commission, for not submitting our allegations against Jyske Bank for Bedrageri. “FRAUD”
Remember that Lundgren’s lawyers must be corrupt
Since what we write and ask Lundgren to present here September 1, 2019.
And like Lundgrens, the day after September 2, 2019, is Lundgrens presented a chase as is 100% against the client’s instructions
Note the email of September 1 at. 11.44
And just below read what Lundgrens presents without sharing with the client, and without the client’s approval, September 2.
And then read Lundgren’s partner writes on September 5 that we do not agree.
Hope that Jyske bank has paid many millions to Lundgrens to disappoint in legal matters, and Lundgren’s lawyer is paying our fees back, although Dan Terkildsen thought Lundgrens has done a great job for us.
Lundgren’s attorneys must be visually impaired and more word blind than their client.
Or even if Jyske Bank A/S paid Lundgrens many millions dkk, hidden as return commission, to help cover Jyske Bank’s A/S fraud and false, against the bank’s customer, and disappoint in residual conditions.
5479 – 4563376 Nykredit
Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.
When you have just read what we wrote to Lundgren’s lawyers on September 1. 2019
And what Lundgren’s submission to the court on September 2. 2019
Without wanting to send the client a copy, which we otherwise asked Partner Dan Terkildsen to send a copy of.
And then ask yourself, if there is a reason we since may 2016, have tried to enter into dialogue, with Jyske Bank Group CEO Anders Christian Dam
To clarify whether, this was simply a mistake, that the group in 2016 could immediately rectify.
Or if there is nothing wrong with Jyske Bank A/S Organization
If a company makes a mistake.
Then the most stupid thing is to lie to the court.
And stupid to submit a manipulated document to disappoint in legal matters.
And then it is also stupid to bribe the client’s lawyer not to submit the client’s claims in court.
Is what the customer here is up to.
The customer’s new lawyer phoned shortly before Christmas 2019 and said that Jyske Bank A/S did not want a dialogue.
and by the way, did not respond to our closing remarks of 28-10-2019.
We are only waiting for our new lawyer, to put on his boxing gloves as we are up against Denmark’s next largest bank Jyske Bank, as is lying and misleading where the bank can.
Where the client very clearly asks their lawyers, to present their customer’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S, and what witnesses to call.
We make it easy for you to look by letters, and emails during the period 11 August 2019 and until 1 September 2019.
And compare what we write to Lundgren’s attorneys, and what Lundgren’s attorneys present on September 2, 2019 in Petition 2.
And when and read it, as Lundgrens presents to the court partner by Dan Terkildsen in Lundgren
Dan Terkildsen writes on September 5, 2019. : There is a need to discuss the stradigy, as we obviously do not agree.
Now we getting pretty angry.
The Danish police would not investigate the Jyske Bank A/S Group for fraud and document false.
The police and the state attorney refuse to interrogate the notifier, or investigate the fraud, by writing Jyske bank will not be convicted.
Where the customer is told that they can present their case to the cevil court themselves, the damn thing is that we are trying.
But that large Danish lawyers companies such as Lundgrens are corrupt, and obviously have been bribed by Jyske Bank A/S
For not having to present their client’s case in court.
This is a threat to the Danish legal system.
The police know we are fraudulent and refuse to interfere.
During the period May June 2019, the Danish Parliament was informed of Jyske Bank’s fraud and document falsification
And has been provided with documentation, no one has answered.
The FSA “Finance oversight” has been asked to look into the case, but has refused to investigate the case, as it is a civil trial.
But when the costumers Danish lawyer Lundgrens seemed to be corrupt.
And the lawyers, do not want to present the clients case to the court, and instead try to manipulate the client, to disappoint in legal matters.
How can customers in the Danish banks then stop the banks’ ongoing fraud against them.
That Lundgrens does not even think they are corrupt, and Lund Elmer Sandager’s lawyers, on behalf of Jyske Bank A/S, write that they strongly distance themselves from allegations of bribery.
In view of the fact that Lundgrens, had already been employed by Jyske bank A/S
Only a few months after the grove was hired to file a case against Jyske Bank for gross fraud
And subsequently against the client’s instructions, did not submit a single statement of the customer’s claims against Jyske Bank’s group and management for participation.
And Lundgren’s lawyers also did not share the court book, nor did they choose to share more litigation with the client.
If the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S has not bribed Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, to help Jyske Bank’s board to disappoint in legal matters. What do you want to call this?
Now read our letters to Lundgrens and see how consistently Lundgren’s attorneys, quite deliberately and in bad faith, did exactly the opposite of what their client repeatedly instructed their attorneys to submit to Jyske bank A/S
If there’s something you can’t find, text us at +4522227713
But when you, like a half-crazy electrician without some book training, have to be your own lawyer while Lundgrens is out to disappoint in legal matters, it’s not easy. Picture is from the hospital where the client was rushed twice after his brain haemorrhage.
When law firms such as Lundgren’s knowingly counteract their client.
It can only be because Lundgrens has been bribed by Jyske Bank A/S
For not presenting their client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank A/S
REMEMBER BY LAW, LAND MUST LAND BEING BUILD
This means that everyone must comply with the law.
And no one should undermine the Danish state, or the Danish legal system.
By entering into agreements with powerful friends, not to be investigated them for fraud.
When large companies such as Jyske Bank A/S is make fraud against their customers, it is then the customer, itself that has to fight the giant to stop the fraud.
Or it is not what the police are for.
When Jyske Bank appeared to use bribery against those of their customers.
To stop their clients ‘attorneys who are going to file their clients’ cases against Jyske bank A/S.
Then this is a country-damaging business.
Danish and intonational law, of course, also apply to Danish banks Jyske Bank and Lundgren’s lawyers.
The former client in Lundgrens, says here to Lundgren’s partner company.
You must stop taking bribes, or what the board of directors of both Lundgrens and Jyske Bank call it.
When Lundgrens in bad faith, chose to manipulate with the client.
And not to present their clients’ claims against the Danish dank JYSKE BANK A/S. which deliberately violates Danish criminal law, in many respects.
But this is not a matter for the Group Board. REMEMBER
We just ask to get in dialogue.
We definitely think that the board of Jyske Bank should meet and call +4522227713
And then admit and apologize for the bank’s fraud.
When yes and then find a grimace that can fit and say sorry
HJÆLP MIG AT SAGSØGE JYSKE BANK for bedrageri, falsk, svig, dokumentfalsk.
Just see the letter of September 1, 2019. to Lundgren’s lawyers with clear instructions, that the case is a fraud, and we claim that Appendix 1.
a swap from 16-07-2008 is false.
And we will summon 9 witnesses.
Compare the Prosecution 2. which Lundgrens submits to the court on September 2, 2019,
And will share some copies with the client. Lundgrens writes in Prosecution 2.
Nothing that the case is presented with allegations of fraud and false.
Lundgrens has removed 7 of the client’s 9th witnesses.
Lundgrens change the client’s claim that Appendix 1. is false, that Appendix 1. the swap is agreed.
Then Dan Terkildsen think they have done a great job, but it must be for the counterparty Jyske Bank A/S.
This is about your legal certainty.
Because if it turns out to be politicians, who stand behind and support that Jyske bank must not be investigated for fraud by the police.
With such clear evidence of both document false and mandatory fraud, then something is wrong in Denmark.
Where does Lundgren’s board stand in this fraud case, against Jyske bank, everyone is involved,
or only the client the 5 lawyers we have mentioned.
these 5 lawyers. at Lundgren’s partner company
This is a true story of when Jyske Bank stole from us 12 years of our lives.
While Jyske Bank exposes us to gross fraud.
And the fact that the danish bank Jyske Bank A/S used a document falsely, and make mandated fraud, even lied to the court, is just one of Jyske Bank’s business areas, when the board maintains that fraud is a great way to operate a bank in Denmark.
Anders Christian Dam has been able to stop the scam since May 2016, but he has refused.
Our home before we were exposed to fraud in Jyske Bank denmark
Watch the little movie. after Jyske Bank was slaughtering us, and ours had to be sold for a candy, to satisfy the greedy bank employees of Jyske Bank.
We also have to share photos from when our home was cleared after scams from Denmark’s second largest bank Here is a scanned copy of our own closing reply 28/10/2019 since Lundgrens seemed a bit corrupt and has not helped their client, but chose to help Jyske Bank against Lundgren’s own client, at the bottom you can see evidence that Jyske Bank has lied to the court, to disappoint in legal matters.
It may be that you think we are crazy.
But this is the truth about Jyske Bank’s business methods.
Methods such as Jyske Bank A/S will hardly only expose us.
And therefore it is a major Danish social problem.
Hope for your understanding and that you can read it as we explain.
After all, it is the small customer, in the large Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S
Who not only had to fight against serious illnesses, and then against Jyske Bank A/S who is grossly deceiving their customer.
But that we as a customer, have also really had to fight against our 2 most recently lawyers Rödstenen and Lundgrens, who must be extremely corrupt, since they have merged the pillars with Jyske Bank against us.
Jyske Bank’s debt collection department demanded that our house be sold.
Just as when Jyske Bank at Anette Kirkeby department head Jyske Bank Helsingoer, and Casper Dam Olsen Jyske Bank Hilleroed, sales of the building site demanded Bybjergvej 45.
Which Jyske Bank afterwards denies any knowledge of.
Now we did not think that Lundgrens would harm our case against Jyske Bank A/S by simply not presenting it.
Birgit Buch Thuesen Jyske Bank Silkeborg
Then refused to open a deposit account, or receive the sale proceeds.
The buyer could therefore not pay for the building site for over 3 years.
While Jyske Bank tries to harm their customer financially as much as possible.
As today 2020, when the groups continue the bank’s fraud, by continuing to raise interest rates 5,32 %, also that part of the loan, that has been forcibly repaid, whether the customer has a swap or not.
But the management of Jyske Bank’s group is completely indifferent.
The Board of Directors has been there at least since 19-05-2016. been 100% aware that Jyske Bank A/S, by forcibly reducing an alleged underlying loan, to Jyske Bank’s swap, which is allegedly restructured, Annex D.
Without letting the Bank Swap. from 16-07-2008 Annex 1. follow down.
Remember that we have not agreed on any interest rate swap 16-07-2008, but have one from 15-07-2008 if we want to borrow 4,328,000 dkk. Appendix Y.
Here you see the fake swap of 4,328,000 dkk, a result of Annex 1.
Which Jyske Bank itself made on 16-07-2008. without agreement with the customer.
But as Jyske Bank for every price wants the customer to deceived.
Here is the swap that was made on 15-07-2008 and is agreed with the customer if they take out an underlying loan of 4,328,000 dkk. in Nykredit, to the interest rate swap.
But Jyske Bank chooses not only to lie to the client, and so the client’s attorneys, even against the court, Jyske Bank A/S by Lund Elmer Sandager lies to want to disappoint in legal matters.
Here you can see that Jyske Bank consistently lies.
And likes to lie to the court as well.
As you can see, Jyske Bank has not only paid to the court. Jyske Bank Board member Philip Baruch has also withheld information.
As if the interest approved by the customer on 15-07-2008 exchange for the offer Appendix Y.
But also withheld that the swap will be closed 30-12-2008.
In addition, the bank’s attorney and board member Philip Baruch have also provided manipulated and false information to the court.
As the annual report 2008 Appendix O. where Jyske Bank has manipulated the annual report, and removed 2 agreement documents.
Jyske Bank did not come to say that it showed nothing to the bank when Philip Baruch himself presented Appendix E. pages 4 and 5 of the swap from 15-07-2008.
But in addition to this, there are many more manipulated and counterfeit documents, which supports that Jyske Bank’s organization is criminal, and that is what we are up against.
Read our submitted closing Reply of 28/10/2019.
We have had to make and present it ourselves, after we got a corrupt lawyer company, that turned out not to be reputable, just like Jyske bank A/S Denmark
Date 27-10-2019 presented with some spelling and typos as Lundgrens counteracted the submission of the case.
We have to complain a lot as there are some spelling and typos
But got only on the 13 scale 05 in Danish and 03 in English, and thus has no book education,
That was also why we sought help from Lundgrens lawyers, who work with several Danish banks.
For 43 months up to this submission, we have in reality been without a lawyer, although the last 2 have forgiven to be our lawyer, they have real work for Jyske Bank A/S
So for those of you who want dishonest lawyers, you must of course still choose Lundgrens lawyers or you can also choose Lund Elmer Sandager, who has shown they are willing to lie in legal matters as well.
That is, 1 year before the customer chooses 03-07-2009 to pick up, a late and other offer for a new project of 4,300,000 dkk
Note that Jyske Bank still raises 5.32% in interest, and that of DKK 2,514,583.
While the customer owes Dk 976,439 on the loan the customer was offered 06-05-2009 at Annex AG.
And thus returned home on 03/07/2009 at an interest rate of 2,4987%
See Annex AH.
Was sent to Jyske Bank I.L.Tvedesvej 7. 3000 helsingore. After Jyske Bank then forces the plot Bybjergvej to be sold, and 3 years after goes to the loan repayment Annex AH. If Jyske Bank refuses to duck at Jyske Bank, the customer is forced into a legal battle, where Jyske bank also buys the Customer’s lawyers to work for Jyske Bank.
The Jyske Bank Group is now deliberately, and dishonestly exposing their customer to deliberate and gross fraud.
We update the banking news page and make it more manageable.
Instead, there are some pages where we describe Jyske Bank’s many violations of the Criminal Code, that is to say, economical crimes.
Regardless of whether Jyske Bank’s board members, have several political friends, who can have political influence, that neither the Danish police, the State Attorney, nor the Ministry of Justice have wanted to help the victim, who is exposed to gross exploitation and financial crime in Jyske Bank A/S, well and the brand is supported by Jyske Bank’s group management in association.
Although we did not think this is funny
We have only been able to fight against Jyske Bank, by writing about the group’s crimes against us as a customer.
Since the Jyske Bank Group management, with a very high probability, has paid our former lawyer
Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
By Partner Dan Terkildsen and his co-head, at least Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen, Pernille Hellesøe, Mette Marie Nielsen, Emil Hald Winstrøm.
Not very likely had plans to present the client’s claims in court.
Page about Jyske Bank’s claims and their denials, where at Jyske Bank A/S has written off our loan offered 06-05-2009 Appendix AG.
reduced with the sale, without letting the interest rate swap Appendix 1. follow down.
Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not.
The Jyske bank group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank knows this, and that the Board of Directors supports the bank’s fraud.
As Mette Marie Nielsen from Lundgrens said, when she called on 18 December 2018 approx. 5 pm and told
These are some very serious accusations we make against Jyske Bank.
To which Mette Marie Nielsen is informed, that she must look in the folder with the evidence, that she has personally been given.
The fact that the Danish lawyer’s houses, such as the law firm Rödstenen in aarhus, choose to cover up a bank’s crimes by directly opposing their client’s extension of allegations against Jyske Bank A/S never presented to the court, is critical when the same lawyer’s house Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, tries wanted to close the case against Jyske bank A/S, and claims it was agreed by telephone.
In one case we write to Thomas Schioldan Sørensen Rödstenen attorneys and ask if there is anything new in the case.
Thomas answer so we have agreed to close the case, which he sent a letter about.
A little funny.
That this alleged letter has never come, only because we move we get stuck in the agreement Rödstenen and Jyske Bank A/S with great sense made to close the case.
When Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is claiming that there was a telephone agreement, between the plaintiff and 2 attorneys from Rödstenen in Århus, as a client, we would stand badly.
There are, after all, the words of Rödsten’s 2 lawyer against, the small plaintiff, who is up against Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank.
Fortunately we had already become suspicious that Rödsten’s lawyers could be corrupt, but could not prove it.
Therefore we have also contacted, our lawyer from the Appeals Board in Case 328/2013. Søren Narv, who has been extremely helpful.
And has in 2017 seen some of the papers we have found, and which did not seem to agree with what Jyske Bank A/S “Lund Elmer Sandager” has presented, Søren looks puzzled at the appendices and says.
If the documents are genuine:
Then it looks completely criminal.
That is why we decide, that it is probably best to record the conversation between the plaintiff and Rödstenens 2 attorneys.
Which should prove to be a good decision.
Since we have subsequently been able to prove that Rödstenens attorneys, at Thomas Schioldan Sørensen have lied in order to bring the case against Jyske Bank.
If Thomas Schioldan Sørensen still does not believe to have lied to the client.
Then we should like to lay the record on her.
And in order to help Jyske bank A/S, to disappoint in legal matters, partly by not presenting the client’s many fraud allegations against Jyske bank, with the worst would, Thomas have tried to close the case, behind the back of the client.
And in direct contravention of the customer’s instructions.
After the law firm Rödstenen, by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, is revealed to have acted dishonestly and dishonestly against the client, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen himself chooses to withdraw from the case.
But Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is not done
Thomas writes repeatedly and recommends that we give up as we have a very bad case.
Which is not the case with Lundgren’s Partner Dan Terkildsen 28-08-2019. pm. 15.42 in mail writing.
I think we have a good case if we stick to the very simple, as I have written earlier written that the swap agreement concerns a loan that has never been paid off.
Dan Terkildsen also writes in mail 28-08-2019
That Lundgrens will not use strong words about “should probably stand as” fraud and false.
Partly because we don’t have to.
And partly because it does not benefit our cause.
And not necessary.
In other words, Lundgren’s attorneys who were transferred to the case on February 5, 2018, and repeatedly instructed to present the case as fraud and false, now write August 28, 2019, that they will not submit it.
If not, because Lundgrens works for Jyske Bank A/S and will harm our case, simply by not presenting the client’s claims at all.
Then, before Lundgrens entered into their million kroner’s cooperation with Jyske Bank A/S, Lundgrens should have withdrawn.
That is unless this cooperation, was entered into between Lundgrens and Jyske Bank in order to disappoint in legal matters.
So when so many lawyers at Lundgrens, have actively helped not to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S
Then it smells of corruption and bribery done between Lundgren’s lawyer partner company and Jyske Bank’s group management.
Who with their over 100 employees, have actively chosen to help Jyske Bank A/S disappoint in legal matters, by not providing what the client has given instructions to provide.
This here feels like an assault and is outright evil, and dishonest business practices.
We already accuse Jyske Bank of being fraudulent.
Just read the sea there since Nov 2016 has been written on the car here.
But now also Lundgren’s lawyers for being corrupt.
Since Lundgrens cannot find out to present our claims.
Like present our claim against Jyske Bank’s regarding the sale of the land, and thus an extra ordinary installment on the loan, from 03-07-2009 in Nykredit, which Jyske bank forgives to interest swap, without simultaneously reducing the swap, at the same time as the actual loan.
Jyske Bank, as always, denies whether it is help with money laundering, their poor advice or otherwise, Jyske Bank always has a different opinion.
But that Jyske Bank refuses to have anything to do with the case of the building site Bybjergvej 45, and refuses to close the transaction, as it took 3 half a year, before Nykredit finally replied, that they would now like to close the deal, even though Nykredit was not obliged to do so.
Thus, we also had to pay interest on that loan in Nykredit and 3% in Contribution during the period when Jyske Bank tried to undermine our business financially, while also exposing us to fraud.
All of this here seems to Lundgrens not important, and it will hurt our case against Jyske Bank to present.
This is at least what Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen writes in his email 28-08-2019, and deliberately does not write our 9 witnesses, only the 2 witnesses that Jyske Bank itself wants to approve Lundgrens will be called.
Since Lundgrens does not submit one, of our allegations against Jyske bank A/S for gross exploitation and fraud
As Dan Terkildsen says it will harm our case
And that Lundgrens will not even send us a copy of the Prosecution dated 02-09-2019 supports our suspicion, of that Lundgren’s lawyer’s business is corrupt.
The case is about FRAUD, Exploitation, withholding of evidence, document manipulation, and lying in legal matters, that’s some of Jyske Bank’s preferred tools in the bank’s struggle to disappoint in legal matters.
But we do not want to find ourselves in Jyske Bank A/S is deceiving, one is that the Danish police refuse to interrogate and investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, and say that you have to bring your claims even in the district court.
Jyske Bank has submitted supporting documents such as these to win the right to raise interest rates of DKK 4,328,000. At the same time, Lundgrens will not submit that the Bank has forced the customer to sell land, and reduce the bank loan in Nykredit Annex AH.
without Lading the interest rate swap down, Dan terkildsen says it will hurt my case to submit the seed something, and we will must agree with what Jyske Bank and Lundgrens must have agreed
Jyske Bank has repaid our loan 4,300,000 dkk offered 06-05-2009 Annex AG.
reduced by sale of building land, without leaving interest rate swap Appendix 1. down.
Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not
The Jyske Bank Group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank employees know it. and roughly Jyske Bank’s board of directors in association supports the bank’s convoluted fraud.
Jyske Bank’s management, believes that they have the right to take interest from Appendix 1.
And that it should be paid to Jyske Bank, That the customer has not discovered.
At the customer has not discovered, Jyske Bank has repeatedly maligned with appendices.
That Jyske Bank has succeeded in lying to the customer since 2008 / 2009 that the Customer has taken out the loan of 4,328,000 in Nykredit.
That it has succeeded in lying to the customer that the loan of the DKK 4,300,000 in Nykredit, has been repaid.
That Jyske Bank has succeeded in covering the swap, customer approved 15-07-2008 which was closed on 30-12-2008.
That the customer has not discovered that Jyske Bank has made one year’s settlement from 2008 Appendix O. where Jyske bank has removed an agreement attachment that starts on 15-07-2008 and closes on 30-12-2008
That the client was ill about 5 years after a brain haemorrhage, and therefore has not discovered the massive lies.
And that Jyske Bank has made a false document.
According to Jyske Bank,
The Jyske Bank must be harmed. And for safety’s sake, made an agreement with Lundgrens, not to submit any of the customer’s claims.
Well, they are proficient in the Danish banks.
Here are Appendices that should have been removed 20-11-2008.
But as Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors now uses towards their customer.
Appendices that should only be used if we wanted to repay the offered loan of DKK 4,328,000.
Nicolai Hansen got these attachments signed on 10-07-2008
Because they were ready, and assured the customer, that they would not be used if we did not take the loan offer.