WHAT IS WRONG IN DENMARK
Vedtægter
§ 1 Stk. 1: Bankens navn er Jyske Bank A/S.
Stk. 4: Bankens formål er som bank og som moderselskab at drive bankvirksomhed efter lovgivningen
Men overholder Jyske Bank Loven eller EJ, det er det store spørgsmål.
In this case, you must note the bank’s own statutes, which comply with the law, which the bank REFUSES
And when neither the police or the State Prosecutor will help, and several others cover Jyske Bank.
Then we must fight, as best we can, if you want to help us stop the criminal Danish banks, you can call and say something to the bad guys in this Jyske Bank.
You can and then tell us if we are stupid and need to correct.
Stk. 5: Banken drives i overensstemmelse med redelig forretningsskik, god bankpraksis og bankens værdier og holdninger
Hvad betyder det ?
Hvis vi er udsat for svindel, og det sker med ledelsens viden og accept, er det så Jyske banks holdninger at bedrage flest mulig kunder ?
Customer claims that Jyske Bank is fraudulent, and that the bank continues fraudulently so that the customer cannot afford to stop the bank’s fraud.
It is a small man against 5000 people in Jyske bank and their lawyers to stop the bank scams.
Hvilket er udført af den samlede koncernledelsen i forening
Men at Philip Baruch lyver i retsforhold, for at dække over jyske banks svig forbrydelser er skræmmende
Bestyrelsen i Jyske bank #Koncernbestyrelsen #SvenBuhrkall #KurtBligaardPedersen #RinaAsmussen #PhilipBaruch #JensABorup #KeldNorup #ChristinaLykkeMunk #HaggaiKunisch #MarianneLillevang #Koncerndirektionen #AndersDam #LeifFLarsen #NielsErikJakobsen #PerSkovhus #PeterSchleidt
Since Jyske bank has bought and paid for our former lawyer to work for Jyske bank.
Have we not really have a lawyer until November 2019.
And when Jyske bank writes October 30, and asking the court, to disregard the client’s presented fraud and false allegations October 28 against Jyske Bank, to demand attorney’s injunction.
Surely so that Jyske Bank could again buy the new lawyer, not to submit fraud allegations, that is the very foundation of Jyske bank.
Do you have another explanation ?.
But this time the client in Jyske Bank has found a lawyer who is not corrupt and who has promised to bring the client’s case against Jyske bank and that according to the client’s own allegations from 28-10-2019.
Share our call for help, but just for your information some have been blocked BANKNYT.dk on facebook.
Perhaps to cover the Danish criminal banks, and to hide the truth that Danish police will not investigate the Danish banks, that are reported for Fraud and Document Fake.
Jyske bank says even Jyske bank complies with all rules and laws! It is apparently very wrong,
For those who come across this site www.banknyt.dk
Then we only try to get into dialogue with Jyske bank.
Since we as a customer do not want to spend 3 days in court, and explain what we want Jyske Bank’s management to confirm.
It’s just about has Jyske Bank exposed us to fraud. And Jyske Bank still exposes us to fraud. Isn’t that something, we can talk about as grown-ups?
Or does it mean so much to the overall Supervisory Board of the danish bank Jyske Bank, that they would rather lie in legal matters than admit fraud and falsehood.
🙂
As Jyske Bank catfish, and CEO Anders DAM writes.
Even the best bank makes mistakes, and so Jyske Bank corrects the mistake as soon as possible.
In other words, this is not a mistake.
But rather deliberate actions, which the entire board of Jyske bank collectively stands behind.
🙂
Dear Jyske Bank We would then like to speak to you.
Read the letters, we have sent several of, which have been presented to the court.
And consider whether Dialog is no better than a million scams against the bank’s customers.
–
CEO #AndersDam #JyskeBank
Call us now, tell the court that we can meet for court mediation, and review the case together.
This is written in a good sense, and we do not want to hurt Jyske Bank’s reputation.
We only write here so as not to be crazy.
TALK WITH US Best wishes
Storbjerg Business
Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek. DK – Denmark
Phone +45 22227713
What is most illegal for banks.
FIND JYSKE BANK
Money laundering.
Fraud.
Document forgery.
Exploitation.
Maybe bribery.
Some of this and more, are Danish customers, in the Danish bank like Jyske bank exposed to.
If you do not believe it, ask Jyske Bank +4589898989 they are allowed to answer you.
The case is in the district court under case no. BS-402/2015-VIB
For the first time since we asked February 2016, the earlier lawyer to present our allegations against Jyske Bank, here we ourselves had to submit them October 28, 2019.
You are also welcome to ask plaintiff +4522227713
And if you find anything, that may be wrong.
Tell us and we
correct it immediately.
🙂
We have found a new lawyer, who is not corrupt, and would like to present the client’s claims against Jyske bank.
🙂
Letters dealing with the case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
Covers allegations and evidence against Jyske Bank, in case BS-402/2015-VIB. as Jyske Bank in several ways, has tried to prevent was presented in court.
–
When our claims document is made, after our closing petition of 28-10-2019, will we share letters from these links.
LETTER LUNDGRENS.
Do you dare to trust Lundgrens lawyers, if the lawyers are corrupt ?. And cover the Jyske Banking fraud. ?.
LETTER RØDSTENEN.
LETTER LUND ELMER SANDAGER.
Do you dare to trust Lund Elmer Sandager lawyer, if the lawyers are lying in legal relationships ?. And cover the Jyske Banking fraud. ?.
LETTER JYSKE BANK.
Management and CEO Anders Dam.
Do you dare to trust Jyske bank if, the
Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors is lying in legal matters, to disappoint in legal matters. ?.
LETTERS TO THE COURT IN VIBORG.
Including appendix 28-101. Which we ourselves have tried to present on 28-12-2018
See Appendix 164. Letter to the court 2. September 2019. See Appendix her
Dear #AndersDam
🙂
The family is ready to forgive Jyske bank.
We seem this here is boring, and would like to do something else, but we already know that. Do you want to talk to us give hand, and say sorry, then we forget it happened. You probably all laugh in Jyske bank over these ridiculous diary pages, but let’s talk now and move on, we don’t think this is particularly funny.
Dear President CEO Anders Christian Dam GET OUT OF THE BUSH NOW AND TALK TO US. OS = THE FAMILY FROM HORNBÆK When Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors admits and apologizes for fraud, we are ready to forgive you all for the 11 years you have taken from us.
Kære #AndersDam
🙂
Familien er jo parate til at tilgive Jyske bank.
Vi synes dette her er godt trals, og vil godt lave noget andet, men det ved i.
Vil du tale med os give hånd, og sige undskyld, så glemmer vi det skete.
I griner nok alle sammen i Jyske bank over disse latterlige dagbog sider, men lad os NU tale sammen og kommer videre, vi synes ikke dette her er særlig morsomt.
Kære president CEO Anders Christian Dam
KOM NU UD AF BUSKEN OG TAL MED OS.
OS = FAMILIEN FRA HORNBÆK Når Jyske banks bestyrelse indrømmer og undskylder bedrageri, så er vi parate til at tilgive jer alle sammen, for de 11 år i har taget fra os.
🙂
The journal Danish banks such as Jyske Bank have major problems in complying, with the law.
Can Danish lawyers be bribed.
Click and see more at Banknyt.dk
🙂
Read our claims BS-402/2015-VIB.
Which after 2 lawyers Redstone Rødstenen in AArhus and Lundgrens in Copenhagen.
Would not present the chase to court, but as the Customer himself after 43 months here 28-10-2019 presents for the court.
🙂
You are probably wondering, why this page about Danish banks is made ?.
🙂
THE ANSWER IS.
🙂
This is a call to the big Danish banks, to not lying at their customers.
With a view to getting an unreported income to the bank.
🙂
A loss from the customer, who becomes a income to shareholders, who actually own the banks.
🙂
An income that becomes a crucial asset loss for the customer.
In Danish it is fraud.
🙂
We know that the large Danish pension funds, own large shares of the Danish banks, such as ATP.
And these act just like Blakstone.
Which the danish government has so much against.
🙂
But the problem with the pension funds, is they don’t care how their wealth increases.
🙂
We already know that banks such as Jyske Bank, which in their cases succeed in calling cases for bad advice.
And that the bank then chases limitation which is only 3 years.
🙂
This is a socially big Danish problem.
As the Danish banks do everything they can, to ensure that their clients do not discover that they are subject to deliberate bad advice.
🙂
At least not until after 3 years have passed, and here is where the banks chase the obsolescence.
🙂
As banks like here, in the case mentioned Jyske bank, seemed to speculate on getting all their obsolete.
🙂
IS THAT IS A PROBLEM
🙂
In order to secure Danish banking customers.
The parliament is forced to change the statute of limitations to the banks.
The statute of limitations on the Danish banks, must be up to at least 5 years, if not 10 years.
🙂
If this does not happen, the banks like here Jyske bank Will not change their business methods.
As our case BS 402/2015-VIB is a good example of.
🙂
The law of good custom must also be changed.
So that it becomes a law that is punishable by transgression.
🙂
If you look at the Danish bank cases, and judgments in through, from Danish banks like Jyske Bank
🙂
Will you be able to read that Jyske bank does a lot of telling in court, they do not have to comply with good practice.
As it does not have any consequence to violate good practice rules for banks.
🙂
If the statute of limitations was,
at least 5 to 10 years.
And good customary law made.
🙂
Wild cases like the hedge case, swap cases and many more cases, for many hundreds of millions hardly to be found.
🙂
But now the law, is as it is.
If the state parliament, wants to help the banks, then the law should not be changed with lying to their customers either.
🙂
And then the banks won’t change.
🙂
In our case.
We have found that banks, like Jyske Bank do not care about the law.
And probably have violated most of the law before crimes.
Remember, since 2016 we have been running around with advertisements,
about the case.
And wrote about it in the diary banknyt.dk here.
Jyske Bank has been fully involved in Banknyt
Since October 13, 2016.
And Lundgrens has been doing it.
Since April 16, 2018.
But they will not realize there is something wrong with their businesses.
🙂
But that we as a client also experience, Jyske Bank bribing our lawyers, not to present the client’s case, to the court.
Is an extension, and this was not expected.
🙂
The case that the customer himself has to present the court.
Is that the customer accuses, Jyske bank of fraud.
And now also bribery, in the form of return commission.
🙂
You can read this in the allegation document from 28-10-2019.
We share our closing response from 28-10-2019 here.
Try and compare our response, with the Lundgrens delivered 18-12-2018
Look at the bottom of the page, banknyt.dk
And ask Lundgrens and Jyske bank.
If they have been some payment, for not submitting the client’s claims, to the court
🙂
See Banknyt.dk bank news
🙂
See Nyforsikring.dk new insurance
🙂
See Nyadvokat.dk new lawyer
🙂
See Rignu.dk rich now
🙂
See Hurtigrig.dk fast rich
🙂
And no this is not fun.
We try to get the management of Jyske Bank to apologize and apologize.
But not least to admit, it is just not okay, to cheat and deceive its customers.
And that it happens with the management behind, as in association.
The management has decided to continue the Jyske bank’s fraud.
What can we do when the Danish police will not investigate Jyske Bank for fraud against our customers.
Police chase 0100-83966-00085
🙂
Ask yourself about, is Jyske Bank an honest, fair, and reputable, Danish bank ?.
Or is there something about the talk of Danish Banks being dishonest ?.
And uses Danish banks to bribe, and lie in legal matters, to disappoint in legal matters.
We only ask because it seems to be a FACT.
–
Or do you have an explanation.
Why the client here, must both fight against their own bank Jyske Bank.
And also have to fight with their own lawyer.
Who directly work against their own client.
In a case that is about being honest, and honorable.
🙂
And what about the great Danish law firms, like Lundgrens.
Have these lawyers acted as a reputable law firm ?.
🙂
We will continuously share all attachments on, among other things, diary since bank new
“Banknyt.dk”
🙂
And now remember this diary, is due to the overall board of Jyske Bank.
🙂
It is the full responsibility of the Board of Directors that we are exposed to fraud, and who do not want dialogue, and that is why we are exposed to fraud today.
🙂
We do not want the case, but we are up against Denmark’s second largest bank, which has a different view of good banking.
🙂
While we are still trying to meet the bank Group President CEO Anders Christian Dam, for an explanation
🙂
Lundgren’s lawyers, Dan Terkildsen, have said on their office, 13-08-2019 That Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has no responsibility.
🙂
We believe that Lundgrens, has only manipulated with us, not to present our claims, so that with the Jyske Bank Board of Directors having no responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud, we do not agree
🙂
WE WANT DIALOGUE
🙂
And, therefore, again asks the chief executive CEO Anders Dam to re-examine the matter
🙂
Isn’t something wrong
🙂
If Jyske Bank did not make money in the pants, then of course we have to pay Jyske bank their money.
🙂
But that we have to be exposed to this is outright evil.
🙂
Dear all of you at Jyske bank.
Lund Elmer Sandager.
Now read the letters we have sent since the beginning of the case.
And see if there is something completely wrong.
CALL US +4522227713
🙂
This is not written in a bad sense.
But only like a breath of fresh air, to research your business for the way you make money.
🙂
From here the very best regards, to the Group Board of Jyske Bank Denmark.
Storbjerg Erhverv
Soevej 5.
3100 Hornbaek
Danmark
+4522227713
🙂
Hope this soon becomes a forgotten cause and we together can laugh at it. so look forward.
WHAT HAVE WE DONE THE DANISH BANK.
SINCE THE JYSKE BANK EXPOSING US FOR FRAUD.
WHAT HAVE WE DONE TO THE BANK.
SINCE JYSKE BANK IS LYING TO THE COURT.
WHAT HAVE WE DONE THE BANK.
SINCE JYSKE BANK, HAS BOUGHT OUR LAWYER, TO WORK AGAINST US, AS THEIR OWN CLIENT.
WE DON’T KNOW
THEY WILL NOT TALK TO US
MAYBE YOU CAN EXPLAIN US WHAT HAPPENS TO JYSKE BANK.
This is a call. Help us get the Danish Bank Jyske bank not to expose us to more FRAUD, we do not know why the bank is fraudulently against us, and they will not stop, what should we do, our last 2 lawyers, have the bank, reasonably bribed not to present our claims to the court. help us, seen a lot of rubbish in the Danish banks, money laundering and fraud in large style. Danish banking news banknyt.dk
This is our diary.
If you want to help us stop the Danish bank’s Jyske Bank scam against us, then please donate a small contribution to our account, for lawyer assistance.
Either Jyske Bank's corporate management is deeply criminal, and wants Jyske bank to be a criminal organ institution, or they have not even discovered we are trying Jyske bank should just spot us, and realize that Fraud against the bank's own customers is a bad thing. Remember this is not a bad announcement, but you know very well that we just want us to go through the case together, because it may not be true that Jyske Bank has paid our 2 most recent lawyers Rødstenen to try to close the case behind our back, and Lundgrens and Rødstenen for not presenting some of our allegations against Jyske Bank for Fraud and False. It must certainly be an evil dream, and we are part of a Danish criminal history that has not been seen before. REMEMBER THERE MUST BE 2 FOR TANGO Anders Christian Dam should we not meet and talk about this here, then it can not be true that Jyske bank's group management really wants to deceive their clients, and lie to the court, and then just bribe the client's lawyers, it does not fit? Well CEO Anders Dam Jyske Bank
Dan Terkildsen from Lundgrens has said on 13-08-2019
That he takes his hat off for our cars, and say it’s damn good.
But he has not provided any of what is written on the cars.
This is related to the fact that Jyske Bank has paid Lundgrens for this service.
Maybe Lundgrens can explain themself, but now it is the Jyske bank we are accusing of fraud fraud and bribery to disappoint in legal matters.
PARDON WE ASK HERE. BUT JYSKE BANK DOES NOT ANSWER ANYTHING.
Now let’s meet, we have an odd fight here.
And when Jyske Bank pays our lawyers to counteract our case, is presented, then it’s not okay. If we lie then we correct and apologize, Jyske Bank will do the same.
Do we have reason to believe the Jyske Bank Group has paid bribes to Lundgren’s lawyers ?.
And that Lundgren’s lawyers have accepted this bribe, in the form of a return commission, for not submitting client’s claims against Jyske Bank for million Fraud and False
And do we have reason to believe that Jyske bank paid our lawyer LUNDGRENS, to disappoint in legal matters, by not presenting the client’s claims to the court.
The letter is just one of many, in which we repeatedly ask, Lundgren’s lawyers, such as the clerk Emil and Mette-Marie and Dan Terkildsen, to present the client’s, ie our fraud allegations against Jyske Bank.
We refer to the SMSs in the letter, with allegations sent to Emil, but which none of Lundgren’s attorneys would provide.
In the letter, the client refers to SMS 23-08-2019. and writes that Emil from Lundgrens has not responded to their client’s SMS / And also refers to Mette-Marie in Lundgrens. Which in turn raised our allegations 10-12-2018, to present the client’s claims to the court 18-12-2018.
IT IS A FACT.
That Mette-Marie chooses with Dan Terkildsen, not to submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank, in the closing petition 18-12-2018
There Mette-Marie is doing the same thing on December 18 and will be sent to court.
IT IS A FACT
That Lundgren’s attorneys 02/09/2019 make and present litigation 2, exactly 4 weeks before the scheduled hearing 30 September In this document.
Lundgrens also did not include any of the client’s fraud claims. Just as it is a fact that Emil does not share Process Letter 2 with the client who first gets a copy, after Lundgrens has been fired, on suspicion that Lundgren’s lawyers are corrupt.
The main claim is still Appendix 1. a change of interest from 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000. for an underlying loan that does NOT exist. That Annex 1 is false is said 1,000 times. Just this little detail, Lundgren’s lawyers fail to present to the court.
IT IS A FACT
That Lundgrens, by Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie and Emil, repeatedly stated that the SWAPPEN of 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. by the client is alleged to be false. When Lundgren’s attorneys present the case, as if Appendix 1. is agreed and approved. Then, directly directly against the client’s instructions, bring the case as a case of bad advice, against the client’s claims. Then it must be Lundgrens and Jyske Bank who must have agreed this.
And why doesn’t Lundgrens send the client a copy of litigation 2. Clear that the client thinks that Jyske Bank must have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, in order not to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank Whether it is Bribery that happened by the Return Commission, or in a fee, hidden in some way, the parties to Lundgren’s lawyers must be able to explain. Like when Jyske Bank hires Lundgrens for a large million tasks.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW IF LUNDGREN’S ADVOCATES HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED? SO YOU MUST ASK LUNDGRENS LAWYER’S AND JYSKE BANK’S MANAGEMENT
Just as Jyske Bank’s board member Philip Baruch of Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys has “lied” or written untrue to the court, and that this has also happened to disappoint in legal matters.
Or is it normal that the big Danish banks and large law firms, in fact, lie and deceive the Danish society in order to earn an unjustified income, which will be a loss to their own clients
Can some customers rely trust on Lundgrens at all
Well these Attorneys at Lundgrens seemed to be for sale to the highest bidder
Or what they themselves thought was going on between Lundgrens and the Danish bank, Jyske Bank
All while Lund Elmer Sandager allows them to disappoint in legal matters, so it’s to lie to the court.
READ MORE
Just ask if we are wrong about it.
As always call os at +4522227713 and if we are wrong, tell us where, and we can, and will fix it
Read more about Lundgren’s lawyers and the danish bank Jyske bank here. And answer us if we have reason to believe that Lundgrens is corrupt, or we have a lively imagination, we have until now had to fight all alone, against a big fraud bank, we believe that Jyske Bank has outbid Lundgrens, to counteract our fraud case, was not presented to the court, and we therefore had to play a lawyer ourselves,
just laugh at us and think we are stupid, but this is too gross and then it is claimed that Denmark is the least corrupt country, so it does not look good in the more corrupt countries.
If Jyske Group Management at Jyske Bank looks back at what we have sent to the Board of Directors and AndersDam since 2016, then you can not understand it is just dialogue we try
Read sms tekst for Emil Lundgrens
Hvad er bestikkelse for en grim ting, når vi mistænker Jyske Bank for at bruge bestikkelse, til at få Lundgrens til ikke at fremlægge klientens påstande. Så klik på teksten og lær
Jyske Bank bribes the plaintiff’s lawyers, in a fraud case against the same Jyske Bank.
Jyskebank refusing to stop ther cheating against the customers.
Read more about Lundgrens at www.NYADVOKAT.dk klik
Denmark's perhaps biggest banking scandal during escalation. Dear Lundgren's lawyers are deeply involved in Jyske Bank fraud, against small business has not been stopped. You can call +45 22227713 and get all the information ,? but they already have :-) - But what do you Lundgrens think about our allegations and evidence against Jyske BANK about the fraud chase. Dan Terkildsen said August 13 that the Board was not guilty of anything, but he will or have not comment on of our claims ? That is very strange ? :-) After being discovered at Lundgrens, is working for Jyske bank, and you were fired, 25 SEPTEMBER. We asked you to send our material back to Hornbaek, the material has not been received. Please send it by GLS to Shell Hornbaek. Incidentally, Lundgren's attorneys should not contact our new attorney, as he Lundgrens is an Inhabian, and you have done enough harm. We also asked you to pay back, the money we paid to Lundgrens. Your partner Dan Terkildsen has denied to pay is back, he believes that Lundgren's lawyers have done a great job for us, but the fact is that Lundgren's has directly cost us far more off time. So you should consider, whether you should not have anything on top of it, and in this way competencies fore that we could have lost the case due to Lundgren's lawyers. But now we're writing this on the site, so many others in Lundgrens can reading it. / We are a customer of Jyske Bank, you have our account number. USE IT. / But now you still work for Jyske Bank Would you like to tell the group management Anders Dam, that we do not want to be deceived. We want to meet and have no interest in writing anything untrue. After all, the question is whether we are right and can prove we are right. What does Lundgrens mean? you never told us that. Feel free to leave a comment on Facebook, Twitter for updates. Best regards from Storbjerg Business Soevej 5 3100 Hornbaek
To those who trust that Denmark is not a corrupt country.
The question is more how many people in Denmark use bribery or corruption to achieve something, like here to keep a case of millions fraud out of court.
Only after 44 months of continuous work, probably 3,000 hours of work, do we succeed in getting our claims against Jyske Bank presented to the court
As we only after, we ourselves have made sure to present the client’s fraud claim against Jyske Bank, in the Danish courts.
Then our new lawyer takes over and makes the new allegation, with a whole lot of new allegations.
What we have asked for presented since 2016.
So not new allegations, but just a whole lot of allegations that our now fired lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers refused to submit, as their cooperation with Jyske Bank did not allow a fraud case
Against the same Jyske Bank.
🙂
Then we got a new lawyer on the case, and looked at the annexes.
A customer of Jyske Bank does not understand why Anders Christian Dam will not just meet.
–
–
A customer of the Danish fraud bank, in connection with the firing of their lawyers Lundgrens, for apparently having received a bribe from Jyske Bank.
Maybe directly by CEO Anders Dam for not presenting the client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank A / S.
The Danish courts have announced this is why Lundgren’s lawyers are retiring.
In Danish, has been fired.
–
Which Jyske Bank Board member Philip Baruch, by Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater has rejected should have happened.
/
Lundgren’s lawyers have commented that these disqualification issues are purely conspiracy theories, and have nothing on them.
Whether Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen himself should be called as a witness.
And the court can explain why Lundgren’s lawyers have not presented the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank for fraud and fraud, while Lundgren’s lawyers.
Presumably by Jyske Bank has been given Lundgrens around 15-20 million Danish kroner to give Jyske Bank advice.
Which could provide a better illumination of Lundgren’s moving grounds, to thwart their small client.
Who now for a third time must have a new lawyer.
/
Since Jyske Bank has strongly distanced itself from possibly having used a return commission, or a bribe in the case, in order that the applicant’s claims against Jyske Bank should not be presented i court.
The plaintiff has therefore just 1. November submitted an Appendix 168. Becomes 168.A in the case
The annex is from Lundgren’s website, where they write that Lundgrens has advised Jyske Bank, in a transaction for a three-digit million amount, in Danish kroner.
“More precisely about 600 million Danish kroner.”
/
After the fraudulent exposed client in Jyske Bank has met with their new lawyer.
And that has gone through the case, and is confirmed in the fact that these are not conspiracy theories, but that they are facts.
The client tells their new lawyer that they are actually satisfied that Jyske Bank is convicted of fraud and forgery false.
Following the allegations which the plaintiff himself had to make in the closing plea, which Lundgrens was certainly paid not to present.
–
Clearly, the plaintiff would have included the seriousness of Jyske Bank, in all likelihood, bribing the plaintiff’s lawyer, not to present the client’s fraud allegations against the defendant danish bank Jyske Bank.
/
Prosecutions directed directly at the bank’s overall Board of Directors to stand together in association with, the Jyske Bank Group’s continued and very serious failure business against the bank’s customer.
/
The plaintiff also states that in three submitted letters from 2018, the group management is all offered that they could actually discharge their mandate.
Know that the board members who chose to sign
Jyske Bank has been exposed to fraud for a number of years and will no longer be contributing to Jyske Bank causing fraud, the members could sign and return the letter to the applicant.
–
By signing, the members of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors could be exempt from liability.
It is stated that not a single member of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors / Group Management has wanted to stop the fraud against the bank’s customer.
/
That with the inner circle in Jyske Bank by CEO Anders Christian Dam, seems to have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, through the use of a return commission.
The applicant’s allegations against Jyske Bank appear to be corroborated only as true charges.
–
When Jyske Bank is ready to lie in the court itself, by Lund Elmer Sandager and in this case has lied to the court, to want to disappoint in legal matters, and then to continue deceive the bank’s customer.
/
/
CEO
Anders Christian Dam
CALL NOW
0045 22227713
This is a continuing hand, which since May 2016 has been hould out against Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
And most be especially clear to you Anders Dam.
–
If you have found something that does not fit, then let’s meet and review the evidence, tell us which places Jyske Bank disagrees with the dokumation.
If there is anything about Jyske bank and the management says that is untrue?
Should we then not meet, and at the same time get the places that have been written accusations against Jyske Bank if there is no team in any of the accusations.
–
This small matter, Jyske Bank’s foundation emphasizes, and running a fair banking business is not part of the board’s wishes.
If we are wrong, we ask the Jyske Bank Group Management for dialogue.
Anders Dam old boy, call now at +45 22227713
And let’s meet, we’re a little tired of one-way communication, after all, it takes 2 to have a dialogue.
/
/
The applicant states that they would still like to receive the court’s offer of litigation.
Which Jyske Bank has shown no desire.
/
That the plaintiff has repeatedly asked the management of the continuing fraud to meet, no one can doubt, therefore we would like to repeat
Jyske Bank is welcome
Just call.
Show that Jyske Bank is an open and reputable bank
Show that Jyske Bank is a fair and honest bank.
IT SHOULD NOT BE SO DIFFICULT.
/
/
In Denmark it is David against Goliath
Thus, the largest Danish banks do business.
And all customers are as vulnerable as we are, the question is just who will be the next victim of Danish bank fraud.
Remember this here is all our thoughts in an open diary.
/
/
The plaintiff’s new attorney has obtained a copy of the closing plea of August 28, 2019.
The plaintiff, who is poor at writing, and probably also slightly dyslexic, has stated that there are some typos and corrects these errors to the best of his ability.
But as a starting point, the lawsuit contains the allegations that Rødstenen’s lawyers and Lundgren’s lawyers have countered were presented.
Whether Lundgren’s lawyers saw Jyske Bank’s Group Management been honored for helping Jyske Bank keep the fraud case out of court by continuing a case of bad advice.
You can think about for a bit of time.
/
Jyske Bank can be contacted here +45 89898989
the company
Storbjerg Business
Soevej 5.
3100. Hornbaek
Denmark
Phone 0045 22227713
/
When it comes to Danish banks, it’s about cheating their customers as much as possible, and banks like Jyske Bank go so far as to expose customers to fraud.
Then it is only a moment before some customer finds evidence that the Danish bank Jyske Bank is going really far for their shareholders.
We can mention here a few of them, Nykredit, Codan, ATP.
Atp’s board of directors does not mind Jyske bank exposing customers to fraud, and will not interfere.
/
Falou the small players fight against the evael big danish bank Jyske Bank at www Banknyt dk
Being a customer of a large Dansk Bank can pose a greater financial risk. Therefore, you have to be very careful about trusting the Danish banks. If there is anything you cannot understand then call 0045 22227713 / Here we tell just about one simple little case. A case is likely to have hundreds of similar cases, like the fraud case here That the Danish police do not care that Danish banks, like here Jyske Bank exposes customers to fraud, is not very lucky. But this time, a customer has resigned, asking Jyske Bank to stop their continued criminal activities. As the fraud the small Danish customer is exposed to in Jyske Bank. / When Danish banks like Jyske Bank deceive customers, and it happened openly without the Danish authorities intervening, it is very unfortunate, and frankly, for the trust in Denmark. / Has Jyske Bank bought and paid more than the applicant's lawyer, from Lundgren's lawyers. Maybe a stupid question, but if Jyske Bank is not behind the bribery of a client's lawyer. ? :-) If the great Danish lawyer company Lundgren's lawyers. Has a good explanation as to why the lawyers have not presented the plaintiff's allegations against Jyske Bank for fraud and fraud Then the former client would like to hear Lundgren's lake explanations. You have our number +45 22227713 / With this, Jyske Bank's return problem, with the bank's credibility. Then the big Danish money laundering cases appeared to pale in the face of Denmark's second largest bank fraud. / Other customers who believe they are also at risk of fraud are calling to come forward and help stop the criminal Danish banks. As the plaintiff in the case against Jyske Bank A / S says, do not be a customer of Jyske Bank and get sick, so the bank will fuck you. / The customer's former lawyer from Lundgrens, received in February 2019 a letter from Jyske Bank through the Danish courts. Here, Lund Elmer Sandager writes that the plaintiff commits criminal acts by sharing more evidence on Banknyt dk. And explain that all charges against Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys and against the management of Jyske Bank are groundless But why didn't the Board call the plaintiff?
Afsluttende processkrift 28-10-2019
Customer catches the BIG Danish bank “Jyskebank” in a million scams.
You probably already know that several Danish banks, have made money laundering for billions.
And that the Danish state first ruled on money laundering, after the criminal activities, through the press now was published.
And and after Estonia, asked a large Danish bank, to close their banking business in the country.
/
Most of our post about criminal Danish banks, it is written in Danish, but further down on BANKNYT.dk
Have we tried in English to explain, how banks in Denmark, through corporate management, do and continue to make fraud.
/
We are trying to explain about, Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank, and that it is the board of directors ther continue ther fraud themselves.
That is the board members ther is behind the bank’s fraud and exploitation of their customers themselves.
🙂
🙂
We is refer to ourselves, if you have any questions, please call us at.
0045 22227713
If you have any questions for the Danish bank, you can call them at.
0045 89898989
The Chase BS 402/2015-VIB
VIBORG
🙂
🙂
The bank directions CEO Anders Christian Dam respond again.
After the bank customer, and client asks their lawyer, Lundgrens Dan Terkelsen, to present the client’s claims that Jyske Bank is doing fraudulent transactions.
/
And after that the bank has learned about the new lawyer, Jyske Bank even themselves contacts the client’s Attorney.
And offers the client’s attorneys Lundgrens a large million task.
And the Danish bank jyske bank, enter into a million agreement, with the client’s attorney’s Lundgrens lawyer.
And afterwards, will the lawyer company Lundgrens, not present any of the client’s claims off fraud to the courts.
🙂
The client thinks therefore the bank Jyske bank, have bribed, their lawyers from the firm of Lundgren’s lawyers, not to present the client’s allegations, and evidence to the danish court.
🙂
In all ways, since May 2016, we have been trying to get management I Jyske Bank to talk to us.
Unfortunately, the Danish bank Jyske Bank is determined, that the members who are together in the association, would rather continue the bank’s million-dollar fraud.
Rather than talking to the deceived customers who question the credibility of the Danish bank.
/
The Danish police have refused to investigate Danich Banks ass Jyske Bank for fraud, and now there is also suspected corruption, or bribery, if you want to call Corruption for bribery.
/
You can ask yourself if Jyske bank is the only Danish bank doing fraudulent transactions.
or whether corruption is more widespread in Denmark than our case suggests.
/
Since we have had to fire Lundgren’s lawyers, for directly to go against our case, against Jyske Bank.
And that nothing from the fraud case has been presented to the court.
And therefore, 43 months after the scam was discovered, we still have not made any of our claims
we must therefore again have a new lawyer.
This time, we take one that Jyske Bank Group Management cannot bribe, with offers to take work for Jyske Bank, what we call the return commission.
🙂
🙂
If Jyske Bank’s Executive Board with CEO Anders Dam wants to meet and talk to us.
Then we like to give thunder coffee, then Anders Dam can bring the cake.
And then we could sit down together and as adult people, then talk together.
/
IT CANNOT BE SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND
WE DO NOT WANT THIS CASE.
BUT THE QUESTION IS
IF WE ARE RIGHT AND JYSKE BANK’S BOARD MEMBERS REFUSE TO ACCEPT IT.
So Jyske bank has a pretty big problem.
/
Are you still amused by your power to deceive the bank’s customers, Anders Dam
we do not think it is fun to be deceived at Denmark’s second largest bank.
And offers CEO Anders Christian Dam
A GOOD COPY THROUGH COFFEE.
ANDERS DAM,
SO YOU CAN GIVE THE CAKE
🙂
And Anders
We still live in Denmark
on Soevej 5.
3100 Hornbaek
Phone +45 22227713
You may also want to call us, let’s meet.
Se more at Banknyt dk
🙂
#news #finans #banks #stokes #JyskeBank #AndersDam #Politi #dkpol
Jyske Bank A/S bag gennemført bedrageri mod bankens kunde, der nu igen må finde sig en ny Advokat, som ikke lader sig bestikke af Jyske Banks koncernenledelse.
see more in English further down
En bank der er ligeglade med hvad der står i loven, det er jyske bank vores påstande for svig og falsk er rettet imod.
og om at drive en hæderlig bank Anders Dam
Det har du CEO Anders Dam lovet i 2016 til BT, efter skattely sagerne , at jyske bank i fremtiden ville drive en hæderlig bank.
Following the many money laundering cases in Danish banks such as Jyske Bank, Danske Bank and Nordea.
–
We then ask if some Danish banks also, lie to the court if banks that commit fraud are discovered.
We also ask about some Danish banks, use bribes to disappoint in legal matters.
Uses Danish banks bribery.
And if so, how widespread is bribery in Denmark.
Which companies in Denmark take bribes.
Takes some Danish lawyers against bribery, from Danish banks.
Does the Danish government care whether some Danish banks use fraud or bribery ?
HOW DOES IT JURISDICTION IN DENMARK, IF THE DANISH ADVOCATES CAN BE BRIBED
just asking.
–
Efter de mange hvidvasknings sager i Danske banker som Jyske Bank,Danske Bank og Nordea.
Vi spørger så om nogle danske banker også lyver over for retten, hvis banker som laver svig bliver opdaget.
Vi spørger også om nogle danske banker, bruger bestikkelse for at skuffe i retsforhold.
Altså bruger danske banker bestikkelse, og hvis ja, hvor udbredt er bestikkelse i Danmark.
Hvilken virksomheder i Danmark tager mod bestikkelse.
Tager nogle Danske advokater mod bestikkelse, fra Danske banker.
Er den danske regering ligeglade med, om nogle danske banker bruger svig eller bestikkelse.
HVORDAN STÅR DET TIL MED RETSSIKKERHEDEN I DANMARK, HVIS DE DANSKE ADVOKATER KAN BESTIKKES
Spørger bare.
–
Det eneste kunden ønsker, er at den samlede bestyrelse i jyske bank indrømmer, at jyske bank A/S står bag Bedrageri “SVIG” mod bankens kunde, og at bestyrelsen mindst siden maj måned 2016, har været vidne om bedrageriet, og frem til nu, har nægtet dialog med den bedraget virksomhed, bestyrelsen har ligeledes ikke ville stoppe jyske banks fortsatte svigforretninger, som koncernenledelsen har rettet imod bankens små kunder, syge som raske, bare for sjov.
At jyske bank ville udsætte ham og hans familie “deres virksomhed” for BEVISELIGT svindel gennem de næste mange år.
Kunden som syntes at være kommet sig.
Selv mens jyske bank og ledelsen fortsætter bankens, fortsate svigforretning imod kunden.
Den lille kunde har taget kampen op mod Danmarks nok største svindler, den anden største bank Jyske Bank.
Og stiller gentagne det samme spørgsmål til koncernenledelsen.
HVORFOR BEDRAGER JYSKE BANK OS KUNDER.
IMENS KUNDEN GENTAGNE FREMLÆGER BEVISER, OVERFOR DEN SAMLEDE BESTYRELSE, AT JYSKE BANK UDSÆTTER KUNDE FOR SVIG OG FALSK.
VI BEDER HER PÅ EN ANDEN OG MORSOM MÅDE AT SPØRGE CEO #ANDERSDAM, OM JYSKE BANKS LEDELSE, IKKE SNART VIL STANSE KONCERNS FORTSATE BEDRAGERI MOD OS.
11 ÅRS BEVIDST BEDRAGERI, UDFØRT OG FORTSAT I OND TRO, ER BLEVET FREMLAGT FOR LEDELSEN.
ALLIGEVEL VÆLGER DEN SAMLEDE KONCERNENLEDELSEN, AT HAVE NOGEN DIALOG, I MENS JYSKE BANK FORTSÆTTER MED BANKENS ÅBENLYSE BEDRAGERI.
HVAD SKAL VI SIGE. BOLLER FRA KOLBERG.
KLIK OG LÆS OM JYSKE BANKS FORMODET BESTIKKELSE AF KUNDENS ADVOKAT, LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER.
Det er da også utroligt at Lundgrens advokater, der har fulgt med på BANKNYT dk. mindst siden 16. april 2018, altså da Lundgrens advokater bevidst og uhæderligt, vælger at indgå en million aftale med jyske bank, i forbindelse med en handel for over 1/2 milliard kroner.
Altså efter vi den 5. Febuar 2018. har overbragt, og dermed givet Lundgrens advokater vores sag, mod jyske bank for svig og falsk.
While the board of Jyske Bank has set out to eat your money, you just have to fight alone against in Bank who do not care who they steal from.
As a shareholder, you do not care about being a co-owner of a bank that will not comply with Danish law. Is it because ATP just as Blackstone is only thinking about getting the most out of their shares, in Jyske bank they don’t care that Jyske Bank is lying to their customers to make more money
Lundgrens som stadig føler løbende med BANKNYT, skulle heller erkende, at Lundgrens advokater ikke skulle have forsøgt at tage røven på deres klient, og indrømme at Lundgrens havde planlagt bag klients ryg, at ville møde op i retten mod jyske bank.
Uden at have fremlagt, en eneste af klientens påstande mod jyske bank, for nogle af de mange forhold af svigagtig optræde, overfor retten.
LUNDGRENs GIV OS NU, VORES PENGE TILBAGE. I HAR TAGET RØVEN PÅ OS, SYNYDT OS. MENS I HAR ARBEJDET FOR JYSKE BANK DIREKTE IMOD OS.
Inden du kalder kunden her tosset, så læs siden, og print beviserne for Jyske Banks bedrageri ud.
SNART VIL ALLE FREMLAGTE BILAG 1-167 & A-AM breve processkrifter mm blive delt, du kan allerede nu rekvirere en kopi af sagen, enten på en USB, eller udprintet, sagen fylder 4 mapper, som dem advokaten fik i sidste uge, selvfølgelig findes der mere. SMS 22227713 hvis du vide mere.
Og spørg dig selv, hvorfor jyske bank, ikke vil svare kunde, og ingen kommentarer har til at flere biler, kører rundt med negativ omtale, som beskyldninger mod jyske bank for Bedrageri, Million Svindel, Svig og Falsk.
Hvis det bare er noget vi har misforstået, må det da være i jyske banks interesse at afdække sandheden, kan ledelsen ikke selv se det virker meget mærkeligt at blive beskyldt for bedrageri, og nu mistanke om korruption / bestikkelse, og så nægter at mødes med os.
Vi taler om at bankens afdeling på Vesterbrogade, der i øvrigt er medvirkende til svindlen, som er udført ved hjælp af dokumentfalsk. SAGENS BILAG 1.
Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade blev kontaktet første gang i november 2016, af en kunde på Østerbro, der sender billeder af jyskebank bilen, og spørger Jyske Bank hvad dette er for noget, han spørger også om Brask Thomsen stadig huserer i banken. “Tidligere FINANS BANKEN.”
Når kunde beskylder Jyske Bank for svig og falsk, strafferetligt Bedrageri samt Dokumentfalsk, og nu også mulig bestikkelse af Lundgrens advokater.
Hvis det er grundløse og grove beskyldninger mod Jyske Bank A/S og Bestyrelsen, så lad os sammen gennemgå hvor der står noget forkert, så retter vi, med et smil.
Så kan vi jo også lige
Er det så ikke noget vi kan tale om, frem for at Jyske Banks Advokater 1. Februar fra Lund Elmer Sandager, ved Philip Baruch, Dorte Halken, hælder vand ud af 👂 ørerne, til retten og Lundgrens advokater.
Hvad jyske bank februar 2019 mener med at sagsøger begår Strafferetlig overtrædelser, ved at benytte ytringsfrihed, til at fortælle om at jyske bank laver svig forretninger, og udsender advarsel til jyske Banks kunder, og orientere aktionærerne.
Jyske Bank er stadig velkommen til at komme med deres forklaring, på hvad jyske bank og LES mener med sagsøgerens anklager mod Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager for at lyve overfor retten, og for at have bortskaffet bilag, at have fremlagt falske beviser, løjet for at skuffe i retsforhold, intet har på sig, måske Jyske Banks Advokater skulle aftale et møde med sagsøger, dette har sagsøgeren, forsøgt siden 2016
Altså at komme i dialog med jyske Banks ledelse, siden maj måned 2016
🙂 men når Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater påstår Sagsøgeren overtræder loven og dermed straffelovens bestemmelser,
HUSK AT DU SKAL IKKE KASTE MED STEN HVIS DU BOR I ET GLAS HUS.
Bankens svar, det er ikke noget, og banken er ved at løse problemet.
Og hvorfor syntes nu 2 af kundens advokater, at være blevet bestukket af jyske bank, til ikke at fremlægge deres klintens påstande mod jyske bank, for svig og falsk, Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab som den seneste.
Se ud til Jyske Bank har BESTUKKET, Lundgrens advokater, som er blevet fyret for at være ganske I loyale, og mistanke om at have lavet en aftale med sagsøgte jyske bank, om ikke at fremlægge klientens påstande
Lundgrens advokater blev fyret 25 september for ganske ilojialt, at have modarbejdet og skadet deres klintets sag, ved at vælge at samarbejde med sagsøgte Jyske Bank A/S, i en ejendoms handel til 600 millioner kroner.
–
Partner Dan Terkildsen som også arbejder som voldgift dommer, mener ikke der er noget galt i at modtage millioner i Honorar af jyske Bank, som Lundgrens advokater af klienten skulle fører en “svindelsag” SVIG sag imod.
At Lundgrenens advokater efter modtagelsen, af jyske banks millioner, ikke har ville have vores påstande om svig, bliver fremlagt for retten.
Kan Lundgrens advokater ikke se noget galt med.
Dan Terkildsen som er partner i Lundgrens, forklarer, at det er mod god advokat skik, at bruge så stærke ord som svig i retten.
Og Lundgrens har således forsøgt at manipulere med klients påstande, således at klienten ikke skulle opdage at, Lundgrenens advokater ikke har ville fremlægge en eneste af klientens påstande om svig og falsk imod jyske bank A/S
Når Lundgrens advokater har modtaget million af kroner for at hjælpe modparten i en sag, og efterfølgende har modarbejdet klinteten.
Ser det ud til at :
LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER HAR TAGET IMOD BESTIKKELSE.
Hjælp os med at standse Jyske Banks konstante, og fortsate svig forretninger imod bankens kunder.
VI FØLER DET SOM OM VI ER MEDVIRKENDE I EN DANSK KRIMINAL HISTORIE, OG SÅ ER DET BARE DAGLIGDAGEN, FRA DET VIRKELIGE LIV.
Dette er en Advarsel imod #JyskeBank A/S & en Advarsel mod #Lundgrens advokater, dem kan du ikke stole på, undtagen hvis du har en bank, så kan du syntes det muligt, at du kan købe dem, er Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab til salg for højst bydende.
Advokat Partner Selskabet Lundgrens advokater, ved den erfarne advokat Dan Terkildsen, blev 24. “25” September 2019 fyret på gråt papir.
Klient i Lundgrens Advokatfirma, må nu for tjede gang have ny advokat, efter deres advokater i Lundgrens Advokatfirma, som ellers skulle varetage deres klientens interesser, mod jyske bank for svig, er blevet opdaget i dirækte at have modarbejdet deres egen klient.
Lundgrens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, har imod alt hæderlighed, og dirækte imod god advokat skik, imod klientens instrukser, om at skulle fremlægge adskillige svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank A/S, ikke ville efterkomme nogle af klientens anmodninger.
Det skal oplyses, at Dan Terkildsen, Lundgrens advokater, på intet tidspunkt har afvist at ville fører klientens påstande om svig mod jyske bank for retten.
Lundgrens advokater har enkelt manipuleret med klientens instrukser, og undgået at svare, givet undvigende svar, og sætter elever til at komme med løbende udskylninger, ganske enkelt for at undgå at svare på klientens spørgsmål.
At advokaten ikke fremlage klients bilag, 28-101 fra 28. December, men istedet usandt oplyste og bekraftede, over for klienten 22. Marts 2019 at alle bilag ville blive medtaget, hvilket eleven på sms bekraftede var aftalt med retten.
“Vi deler samtaler og sms i sagsmatrialer som skal understøtte at tidligere advokater og advokatfuldmægtig fra Lundgrens bevidst har vildledt klienten.”
Som når den fuldmægtige 22 marts 2019 telefonisk bekræftede, at sagen handler om svig og falsk, og så at vidner som Anders Dam og Philip Baruch, med flere skal indkaldes, for så 13. August 2019 at tale Dan Terkildsen efter munden, da Dan siger
“undlader efternavn på elever” Emil har styr på vidnerne ik, Emil bekraftede, og nikkede til Dan, men udspekuleret nævner hverken Dan Terkildsen eller Emil hvilken vidner, vi har besluttet skulle indkaldes.
I oktober da vi får sags materialet i sagen BS 402/2015-VIB og processkrifter 2. Samt B. C. bliver vores værste anelser bekraftede. 2. September 2019 kan vi konstatere at Lundgrens, ikke har fremlagt hvem vores vidner er, men bare har bekraftede dem jyske bank i Mars har oplyst banken ønsket indkaldt.
Vi bliver ligeledes bekræftet i at Lundgrens advokatpartnerselskab, ved den fuldmægtige Emil 22 marts 2019 både på sms og telefonisk har løjet overfor for deres klient, om at Bilag 28-101. var fremlagt.
FAKTA er BILAG 28-101. Er ikke blevet fremlagt, men Emil har i stedet i juli måned fremlagt nogle andre bilag, med andre bilags nummer, disse bilag har Lundgrens fremlagt uden processkrifter, og uden bilags liste, ja de er fremlagt uden at have aftalt det med klienten.
Hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke var advokat for jyske bank, ville klientens påstande og beviser Bilag 28-101 være blevet fremlagt, bilag 98. Var i øvrigt en bilags liste.
Lundgrens tidligre klient, er ret sikker på at at Jyske Banks bestyrelse, har bestukket ders advokat #LUNDGRENS med en million ordre, til at gå i seng med fjenden 🙂 griner altså “#JYSKEBANK”
På trods af klientens ellers meget klare instrukser til LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER, Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie, Emil, har Lundgrens direkte modarbejdet, at deres, klient har fået fremlagt nogle af deres påstande fremlagt, mod jyske bank for blandt andet SVIG, “Bedrageri i en millionsvindel sag” udført ved SVIG OG FALSK.
DR “BEDRAGET 2. ER IKKE LANGT FRA VIRKELIGHEDEN”
Klienten ved ikke at deres advokat mod jyske bank arbejder for, JA selv samme jyske bank
Jyske Banks Svigforretninger som klienten, mener den samlede bestyrelse / koncernledelsen i foreningen står bag, og stadig fortsætter, og det sker for at fortsætte bankens svigagtige optrænder over for jyske banks kunde.
I min bog blive jeg selv forsøgt myrdet, af en lejemorder hyret af Anders Dam, nu er det fiktion.
Kunde i jyske bank bliver skudt ned i Hornbæk havn, Skuddet ramte kunden bagfra og blodet sprøjtede ud over den båd Carsten stod og beundrede i havnen, da Carsten faldt forover og ned mellem kajen og det nu blodrøde sejlskib
Igor kom frem fra sit skjul bag fiske containeren som han gemte sig bag, inden han kort forinden trykkede på aftrækkeren, og lod det måske dræbende skud ramme
Det bliver en god historie
Lundgrens advokat og partner Dan Terkildsen, fortæller 13-08-2019 bestyrelsen, ikke har noget ansvar for det jyske bank, udsætter os for, lige som Dan også siger at der skal fjernes flere af de nu fremlagte bilag “beviser.” Og siger vi skal naturligvis være enige.
Problemet er bare lundgrens Dan Terkildsen har allerede valgt at hjælpe jyske bank, ved at modarbejde vores sag og påstande mod jyske bank bliver fremlagt.
Efter Dan Terkildsen har udtalt, at jyske banks bestyrelse ikke, har noget ansvar, for hvad jyske bank koncernen laver, og altså det svig som koncernen har udsat os kunder for, siger Dan Terkildsen også at han ikke er nogle papegøje, der bare gentager det vi siger, men siger også at han tager hatten af for vores bil reklame, og siger det er godt gået, samtidig med at han griner, hvilket er gratis at sige, i Retten Viborg er det påstande og beviser dommeren skal dømme efter, ikke reklame.
Dette samtidig med at Dan Terkildsen har planlagt at møde 30 september i Viborg byret, uden at have fremlagt nogle af klientens svig og falsk påstande, som ellers er tydeligt skrevet på bilerne, men at Lundgrens advokater også har planlagt, at få fjernet flere af de nu fremlagte bilag lugter mest af bestikkelse.
Lundgrens advokater der tydeligvis har en skjult dagsorden, og forsøger at manipulere med deres klient, for at hjælpe jyske bank, med ikke at ville fremlægge klientens beviser og påstande mod jyske bank for svig, og koncernen ledelsen for medvirkende til fortsat Svig.
Hvis Lundgrens samlede partnere, ingurerrer at Dan Terkildsen har skadet Lundgrens klients sag mod jyske bank, ved ikke at ville fremlægge klientens påstande, mod jyske bank, imens jyske Banks millioner er rullet ind på Lundgrens konto, i form af honorar, for den hjælp Lundgrens advokater har ydet Jyske Bank, og vel stadig yder Jyske Bank, Så lugter det af råddenskab og korruption i det samlede Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab.
Understøtter dette ikke blot, klientens mistanke, om, det er de samlede partnere i LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER, som er sammen, om at skade deres egen klients sag, i mod jyske bank, samtidig med Lundgrens advokater muligvis har brugt klientens svig sag, til at kunne udvide sammen arbejdedet med jyske bank A/S
Trodde ikke at Lundgrens advokater, ville lade sig trække med ind i jyske banks fortsatte svig. Og dirækte er medvirkende, som Nykredit A/S der også i en periode hjalp Jyske Bank, ved at tilbageholde oplysninger om lån 4.328.000 kr. der ikke findes.
Der findes flere som har dækket over at jyske bank laver svig “Bedrageri”, ved at forsøge hjælpe jyske bank, enkelt ved at tilbageholde oplysninger overfor klienten, og at Rødstenen og Lundgrens begge nægtet at fremlægge klientens påstande over for retten, samtidig med at Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater har løjet over for retten.
Dette er råddenskab i store danske advokat huse, som ingen andre klienter før har kunne bevise.
Dan Terkildsen vil nok sige, at Lundgrens ikke har noget ansvar, lige som Morten Ulrik Gade, Birgit Bush Thuesen, og som Philip Baruch skriver JYSKE BANK HAR INGEN ANSVAR.
Det ser ud til at korruption og bestikkelse i Danmark, trives i bedste velgående, at det sker for at skjule store #Danske #bankers Bedrageri / svig forretninger er kun sørgeligt.
Særligt i de store Danske Advokater virksomheder og i Danske banker, syntes korruption og bestikkelse at trives.
Hertil er dato 5. Februar 2018 hvor Lundgrens advokater har fået vores svig sagen mod jyske bank.
Og så oplysningerne om at Lundgrenens advokater i perioden marts til juni 2018, har taget imod opgaven fra jyske bank A/S, om at Lundgrens advokater skulle give jyske bank rådgivning i forbindelse med en handel til omkring 600 million kroner.
DETTE SYNES AT VÆRE ET GODT BUD, PÅ HVORFOR LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER HAR MODARBEJDET VORES SVIG SAG, DER IKKE ER BLEVET FREMLAGT OVERFOR RETTEN.
Sagen mod jyske bank, der er en mindre svindel sag, og bare for nogle millioner, hvor kunde i jyske bank siger at jyske bank udsætter kunden for et fortsat bedrageri.
At Dan Terkildsen på første møde, spørger om vi tror Jyske Bank har lavet alt sammen med vilje, og hverken dengang marts 2018 til her sidst møde 13-08-2019 har ville sige hvad det er som vi påstår, er mærkeligt.
Men efter Klienten har opdaget at Lundgrens advokater, der er ( VAR ) kundens advokat, men som allerede og samtidig har lavet million forretninger for Jyske Bank, og derfor har store økonomiske interesser i at ville arbejde for jyske bank, og vel derfor hjælper jyske bank i mod Lundgrens egen klient..
Lundgrens kan naturligvis ikke fører en Bedrageri “svig” sag imod jyske bank, samtidig med at jyske bank betaler millioner i honorar til Lundgrens for andre opgaver.
Læs om kunden der alene selv, også har måtte kæmpe mod selv sine egne advokater fra Lundgrens og Rødstenen advokater, for at få fremlagt deres påstande, og beviser for at stoppe jyske banks fortsatte million svig, mens politiet og statsadvokaten, har nægtet, at undersøge om der er noget om snakken.
Den Danske stat har på denne måde, faktisk hjulpet jyske bank, ved at nægte efterforskning af Jyske Bank, for dokumentfalsk og bedrageri imod bankens kunde.
Statsadvokaten skriver: At kunden selv må fører sine påstande, mod jyske bank for svig og falsk i civilretten. Her prøvede så både Rødstenen og Lundgrens at få svig og falsk påstanden fjernet, od direkte mod god advokatskik arbejdede Lundgrens og Rødstenen i mod deres klient påstande blev fremlagt.
Read about the client who alone himself, also had to fight even his own lawyers from Lundgren’s and Rødstenen’s lawyers, to present their allegations, and evidence to stop Jyske Bank’s continued million fraud, while the police and the state attorney, have refused to investigate whether there is anything about the talk.
In this way, the Danish state has actually helped Jyske Bank, by refusing to investigate Jyske Bank, for document fraud and fraud against the bank’s customer.
The prosecutor writes: That the client must make his own claims against Jyske Bank for fraud and false in civil law. Here both Rødstenen and Lundgrens tried to have the fraud and false claim removed, or directly against good legal practice, Lundgrens and Rødstenen worked against their client’s allegations.
Det viser sig at være en svær opgave for jyske Banks kunde, at stoppe bankens fortsatte bedrageri, når Jyske Bank syntes at lave aftaler med kundens advokater, om ikke at fremlægge kundens Bedrageri påstand mod jyske bank, og at mindst Lundgrens vælger jyske bank som partner.
It turns out to be a difficult task for Jyske Bank’s client, to stop the bank’s continued fraud when Jyske Bank appeared to make agreements with the client’s lawyers, not to submit the client’s Fraud allegation against Jyske Bank, and that at least Lundgrens chooses Jyske bank as a partner .
Men når kunden nu skifter advokat, til en som jyske Banks bestyrelse ikke har kunne bestikke, med opgaver for Jyske Bank, for at modarbejde sagen mod jyske bank for svig, bliver fremlagt.
Og når jyske Banks koncernledelse, med CEO Anders Dam i spidsen, lader Jyske bank A/S advokater fra, Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater lyve selv overfor domstolen, med det ene formål, at skuffe i retsforhold, således BANKENS SVIG FORRETNINGER kan fortsættes.
På Dansk så at jyske bank fortsat kan udsætte bankens kunder for svig, og dette svig sker åbenlyst med Ledelsens fulde opbakningen.
Hvem mere vil medvirke til at Danske Banker som jyske bank laver Bedrageri
But when the client now switches lawyer, to someone who Jyske Bank’s board has not been able to bribe, with tasks for Jyske Bank, to counteract the case against Jyske Bank for fraud, is presented.
And when Jyske Bank’s group management, with CEO Anders Dam at the forefront, Jyske bank A / S lets lawyers from Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys lie to the court themselves, with the sole purpose of disappointing legal matters, so that the BANK’S FRAUD BUSINESS can be continued.
In Danish, Jyske Bank can continue to expose the bank’s customers to fraud, and this fraud is evident with the full support of Management.
Who else will contribute to Danske Banker as Jyske bank doing Fraud
Velkommen i jyske bank
Er Jyske Bank ærlige, Er Jyske Bank troværdige, Er Jyske Bank hæderlige, Er Jyske Bank Danskeres bank.
Eller er jyske bank en lands skadelig eller samfunds skadelig virksomhed. ?.
Jyske Banks Fundament
FØLG OS PÅ BANKNYT OG TÆNK OM DU OGSÅ VIL UDSÆTTES FOR JYSKE BANKS BEDRAGERI, SOM BANKEN UDSÆTTER OS FOR.
Lundgrens advokater er grunden til at Jyske Bank stadig kan lave Bedrageri mod kunde.
Det ser sådan ud at LUNDGRENS advokater som skulle fremlægge deres klintetens svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank A/S.
Er enten købt eller bestukket af jyske bank, alene det at jyske bank giver Lundgrens million opgaver, og Lundgrens påtager sig opgaven, samtidig med Lundgrens har vores sag mod jyske bank for “Bedrageri” svig som Lundgrens har ladet os “klienten” tro, ville blive fremlagt af Lundgrens.
Klinten har 20 september 2019 skrevet til Dan Terkildsen at Lundgrens advokater, ligesom Rødstenen advokater, har modarbejdet at vores påstande bliver fremlagt i retten, Dan har ikke kommenteret dette.
Har Lundgrens fået million opgaver af Jyske bank, for at holde vores påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk ude af retten. ?
Man kan næsten ikke tro, vi fortsat skal udsættes for dette her svig, vi har jo bare anmodet jyske bank og ledelsen om at mødes, for at få talt sammen.
It looks like LUNDGRENS lawyers who were supposed to present their client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske bank A / S.
Lundgren’s lawyers are the reason why Jyske Bank can still make fraud against a customer.
Is either bought or ordered by Jyske bank, only that Jyske bank gives Lundgren’s million tasks and Lundgrens takes on the task, while Lundgrens has our case against Jyske bank for “Fraud” fraud which Lundgrens has let us “client” believe, would be presented by Lundgrens.
The client has written to Dan Terkildsen on September 20, 2019 that Lundgren’s lawyers, just like Rødstenen’s lawyers, have countered that our claims are presented in court, Dan has not commented on this.
Har Lundgrens fået million opgaver af Jyske bank, for at holde vores påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk ude af retten. ?
You can hardly believe we should continue to be exposed to this fraud, we just asked Jyske bank and the management to meet, to talk together.
Disse her barnlige og for jyske bank sikkert nogle ganske morsomme indlæg, det er sku da dumt ikke at tale sammen, jyske bank er en anderledes og uredelig bankforretning, hvor det at snyde og bedrage må være fundamentet for Jyske Bank
ANDERS DAM. HUSK SAMTALE FREMMER FORSTÅELSEN.
At jyske bank har købt og betalt vores advokater fra Lundgrens, sådan ser det ihvertfald ud, siden Lundgrens advokater har modarbejdet deres egen klient.
Vores advokat LUNDGRENS i sagen mod jyske bank for SVIG, syntes at vælge at gå i seng med fjenden, og rådgive jyske bank i million sag, frem for at ville fremlægge vores påstande mod banken.
Det må stå klart for både Lundgrens og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, at begge disse advokat virksomheder sammen, bør opdrages af Advokat samfundet, og lære hvad god advokat skik er for noget, og om det ikke også gælder for de advokater som arbejder for de Danske banker.
En finansiel katastrofe, ikke kun for tilliden til de store Danske Banker, men også tilliden til de store Danske Advokat virksomheder, som skulle hjælpe deres klienter, men som istedet hjælper bankerne, med at skjule bankens fortsatte svigforretninger i mod deres kunder.
SKULLE DENNE HER SAG VÆRE ET ENESTÅENDE TILFÆLDE ? NÆPPE.
Jyske bank udsætter os kunder for groft svig, dette opdaterer vi først i 2016, og beder Thomas Schioldan Sørensen fra Rødstenen advokater, om at ændre i vores påstande.
I 2017 må vores advokat Thomas Schioldan Sørensen i sagen stoppe, efter vi tager advokatvirksomheden Rødstenen, i at lyve overfor os, og sikkert også har lavet en aftale med jyske bank, Thomas Schioldan har forsøgt, bag ryggen af klienten at ville hæve sagen mod jyske bank, som af klienten, i 2016 var oplyst ændret til en sag om svig og falsk, hvilket Thomas Schioldan stik i mod klientens anmodninger, ikke har ville fremlægge for retten.
Da Storbjerg Erhverv herefter må søge efter anden advokat, spørges bla. en advokat, der er bestyrelses formand for en stor advokatvirksomhed, om hjælp men må afvise at hjælpe, da de har hjulpet jyske bank i en sag med BRF KREDIT.
I marts 2018 bliver vi af en tidligere bank diriktør, anbefalet Lundgrens advokater, mere bestemt Dan Terkildsen.
Dan Terkildsen bliver oplyst, om de andre advokater, vi har talt med, men som ikke har kunne tage sagen, Dan bliver fremlagt at sagen mod jyske bank er en svig og falsk sag, og Dan Terkeldsen siger at han ingen problemer har med at føre sagen mod jyske bank for svig. “Bedrageri” Lundgrenens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, tiltræder omkring febuar 2018.
Her efter har vi ikke kunne få Lundgrens advokater, til at fremlægge nogle af vores påstande, og har ikke kunne få svar på noget af det vi har skrevet.
I dag 21. September 2019 googlede vi så ordene “Lundgrens Jyske Bank” det gav indblik i hvordan Lundgrens advokater i juni 2018, på deres hjemmeside, har fremlagt at have hjulpet Jyske Bank med en handel for et tre cifret million beløb.
HVORDAN LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER KAN HJÆLPE JYSKE BANK MED EN SAG FOR FLERE HUNDREDE MILLIONER
Nu er bilag 2. September blevet fremlagt retten, så mangler vi bare vores påstande, hvilket sagsøgeren nok selv må sørge for at fremlægge, hvis sagsøgerens advokat Dan Terkildsen stadig nægter, eller fortsat modarbejder at kundens påstande fremlægges for retten.
Eventuelt må klienten finde en ny advokat, og denne gang en hærderlig advokat, som ikke er i lommen på jyske bank, til at fremlægge klientens påstande.
Nu deres advokat Dan Terkeldsen fra Lundgrens advokater ikke syntes at være loyal overfor klienten, og når Dan Terkildsen ikke svare på på klientens påstande, og Lundgrens arbejder selvstændigt, uden at ville forholde sig til nogle af klientens påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk.
Dan Terkildsen skriver, at vi ikke syntes at være enige om stradigien, uden Lundgrens advokat dog skriver hvad han mener, vi har skrevet at Lundgrenens advokater i 2018 blev ansat til at føre en svig og falsk sag mod jyske bank, og skrevet at Lundgrenens advokater har modarbejdet at vores påstande fremlægges.
Vi har også bedt Dan Terkildsen at svare på, hvorvidt Lundgrens advokater allerede arbejder for jyske bank, og hvis ja, så svarer hvor længe, Lundgrens advokater har arbejdet for Jyske Bank.
Storbjerg Erhverv er oppe i mod en uredelig og uhæderlige jysk bankvirksomhed, hvor beskidte tricks benyttes for at holde sagsøgerens påstande væk fra retten.
Danmarks nok mægtigste bankmand CEO Anders Christian Dam, står fast, og nægter at svare bankens kunder, og dermed, har også koncernenledelsen tilbage holdt vigtige oplysninger, om det af Jyske Banks påstået lån på 4.328.000 kr. er optaget i Nykredit og derefter påstået omlagt, som jyske bank har fremlagt det overfor retten.
Den samlede Jyske Bank koncernenledelse, har mindst siden 19. Maj 2016 harft viden om bankens svindel, mod jyske banks egen kunde, hvor ledelsen kunne have være skrede ind, og undersøgt sagen, samt stoppe Jyske Banks fortsatte svig imod jyske banks kunder, men dette har ingen i jyske bank koncernen ønsket.
Koncernenledelsen, nægtede istedet, at bekrafte eller afkræfte hvorvidt, kunden har optaget / hjemtaget det underliggende lån i Nykredit, som banken og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, har påstået overfor retten.
Og siden maj 2016 har koncernen nægtet, og nægter stadig at stoppe jyske banks million svindel, og udnyttelse af bankens små kunder, hvorfor kunden i september 2019 gennem 43 måneder, stadig kæmper, for at få deres påstand om Jyske Banks SVIG FORRETNINGER fremlagt overfor Domstolen.
Koncern diriktør Anders Christian Dam, har flere gange siden 19 maj 2016 kunne vælge selv, og helt personligt, at kunne have stoppe Jyske Banks million svindel, imod bankens egen kund.
Men Anders Dam vælger sammen med den øvrige ledelse, ikke at stoppe svindlen, der samtidig ville have afsløret advokatvirksomheden Lund Elmer Sandager for medvirkende, i at skjule Jyske Banks bedrageri “svig” mod kunde i jyske bank, hvor Philip Baruch for jyske Bank, flere gange har løjet overfor retten.
Philip Baruch der også bestyrelsesmedlem i jyske bank, har mindst haft et møde 02-11-2018 med Lundgrens advokater, Dan Terkeldsen, som er vores advokat i sagen mod jyske banks svigforretninger.
Efterfølgende har Lundgrens advokater modarbejdet og dirækte imod klientens instruks, ikke ville fremlægge nogle af klientens påstande, som Svig og Falsk overfor for retten.
Svig og falsk hvilket både Rødstenen advokater sammen med Lundgrens advokater, begge har modsat sig bliver fremlagt, klientens Advokater har nu i samlet 43 måneder direkte modarbejdet at klientens påstande er blivet fremlagt.
Jyske Banks bestyrelse ved alle sammen udemærket, at jyske bank realt kynisk udsætter os kunder, os for et fortsat bedrageri, og dette udføres ved hjælp af dokumentfalsk, og ved at Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, flere gange i sagen, har løjet overfor retten, hvilket kunden har oplyst til retten.
Mens bankens mægtige ledelse, klammer sig fast til deres bestyrelses poster, og million indtægter, udsætter jyske bank os kunder, helt bevidst for Bedrageri.
Hvilket kunden bad deres advokater, først Thomas Schioldan Sørensen fra Rødstenen i 2016 og 2017
Og så Dan Terkeldsen fra Lundgrens advokater i 2018 og 2019 om at fremlægge som SVIG & FALSK.
HVILKET BÅDE RØDSTENEN ADVOKATER, SAMT LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER. I 43 MÅNEDER HAR NÆGTET AT FREMLÆGGE OVER FOR RETTEN.
Tænker at koncernenledelsen i jyske bank satser på politiet også efter en hovedforhandlingen, som nok kun kan forhalles frem til 2020.
Hvor beviserne for jyske Banks mange forskellige forhold af lov overtrædelser, er fremlagt, og vil blive fuldt op af et nyt processkift, og påstands dokument.
Som vi nu, sansynligvis, må have en ny og tredje advokat, til at fremlægge, eftersom både Rødstenen og Lundgrens advokater syntes ligge i ske med jyske bank, samtidig med at have forgivet, at være klientens advokat, med det formål at dregne klienten for penge og energi, dette er hvad klienten føler.
Men det kommer ikke til at ske, nu bliver kunden bare rigtig godt gal.
Alt imens Lundgrens advokater tilsyneladende, fortsat vil dække over Jyske Banks bestyrelsesmedlemmer, har medvirket til at bankens kunde stadig i jyske bank, gennem nu 11 år udsættes for endog groft svig.
Kunden i jyske bank er ret sikker på, at den samlede bestyrelse i jyske bank, står sammen i forening, om at Jyske Bank fortsætter med at udsætte kunde for svig, i håb om kunden ikke kan få råd til en advokat, der kan stoppe jyske banks fortsatte svigforretninger imod bankens kunder.
For jyske bank koncernen & koncernenledelsen, handler det om økonomisk at udmattet kunden, som banken forsat udsætter for “SVIG” Bedrageri.
Her har vi en stor Dansk Bank der er helt uden nogen form for moral, uden etik lader deres kunder udsætte for Bedrageri, det vi fremføre som GROFT UDNYTTELSE VED SVIG OG FALSK.
Udskydes hovedforhandlingen mod jyske bank A/S
Her finder du links til sagsøgerens påstande og forklaring.
På 43 Sider 28-08-2019 forklarer jyske Banks kunde igen, hvad der er af påstande, og at de alle skal fremlægges for retten, find link til brevet her.
En sag om advokat virksomheden og banken der lyver overfor retten.
For at skuffe i retsforhold.
One of Denmark’s probably biggest fraud organizations, where some of the most power is full in Denmark, supports the bank’s ongoing fraud among the bank’s customers. –
Or should we really be the only one that Jyske bank exposes to massive fraud and False.
Follow the case on Facesbook
–
Click and read that we inform the court about in letters
January 3 and January 25, 2018
August 2, and corrected 2019
And as an example to our attorney November 4, 2018. Citing the letter Jan 3, 2018
As the court writes November 13, 2018, Seen in the light of what we have written and presented, and immediately after November 13, write and inform our lawyer.
That everything that we have presented to the court, must be retained
Believes that by the letter 03-08-2019 and sent information, to the court that the case, still is a fraud and false case.
And we as in letters to the court from 3 and 25 January 2018. Still accusing “Jyske Bank” Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys for lying to the court.
We are still expecting, the court to investigate, this charge against the attorneys, whether board member Philip Baruch has lied, or provided any information to the court that is false.
So, if some lawyers and the court, by the letter of November 13, 2018, succeeded in removing our sent letters of January 3 and 25, 2018
Then must the letters be into the chase BS 1-698/2015 again.
Or is it possible to misunderstand what we highlight is the case
Lying in legal relationships, fraud and fake
The case also contains the claim that there is no loan, but Jyske bank has made fraud, to make the customer believe this existed and that the customer has rescheduled this loan.
This is easily proved by Appendix 30. D and Appendix 28.
Jyske bank claims customer has borrowed $ 4,328,000 in Nykredit Bank
Nykredit as above of 5% shares in Jyske Bank. Therefore, do not want to help customer against Jyske Bank in fraudulent case.
As Nykredit lawyer Mette Egholm Nielsen says at a meeting,
Nykredit does not want to deliver a lawsuit against Jyske Bank.
No one can want to prohibit a customer, from presenting to the court that this is fraud. and then the sanity has only grown, as the board has covered the scam, though several attorneys have helped cover up the fraud.
AND SO WE WRITE IN THE COURT OF AUGUST 3, 2019
THIS IS NOT FUN
BUT JUST BECAUSE THE GROUP’S MANAGEMENT SEEMS, THIS IS SO FUCKING FUN.
WE SEE IT IS SORRY, FOR THOSE WHO TRUST ON DANISH BANKS.
Since 2008, Jyske Bank has exposed a small customer to fraud
The customer discovers that Jyske Bank is making fraud in 2016.
And here, tells Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers, and the management of Jyske bank about it.
THE ANSWER IS NOT AVAILABLE
And we have not received much help towards the bank, what we have received, we have paid dearly for.
But we hold on, in our claims, and Anders Dam asks the Court to adjudicate on the case.
Anders Dam, REMEMBER
Just because Jyske Bank can deceive, does not mean you have to deceive your customers.
Here is a very brief part of the case we have asked our lawyers to submit to Jyske Bank
Let the evidence speak for itself.
Are we dealing with a criminal organization?
When this mighty bank, in every way, has thwarted the investigation and investigation of the case
Misled and disposed of documents, remember a thief even, if it is a bank well, can be discovered.
Main hearing starts September 30, 2019 BS 1-698 / 2015 at 9.00 Viborg
Remember that the bank is not convicted but what does the evidence say
Here, Philip Baruch of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors will fight to win over the client who just will not give up the talented lawyers of Jyske bank
We have asked our lawyer to go after you for lying in court
It will now be nice to be able to get a verdict in the case, and hopefully get the fraud stopped after 11 years.
The battle between the top management in Jyske Bank and Storbjerg Erhverv
Will be led by CEO Anders Dam who for the combined group as well as the equally experienced Lawyer Philip Baruch, who believes that Jyske Bank is an honest and honorable bank that complies with all laws and regulations.
And therefore take the matter with serenity
The mighty bank Jyske bank, is expected in court to do everything they can to fight their customer Storbjerg Erhverv.
Because in Jyske bank it’s all about winning, it’s not about running a reputable banking business.
The client does not care regardless of their own lawyer, has not confirmed that Jyske bank is suing them for fraud.
So that is our view, and we will present that too.
Jyske bank thought it was easy to cheat and deceive a sick customer
But apparently made horrible mistakes.
Therefore, these witnesses from Jyske Bank, are repeatedly requested to call.
Anders Dam why don’t you want to talk to us.
What have we done since you, along with the rest of your army, deceived us?
You can offer us a meeting and explain to us what we have done in Jutland since refusing to make up Jutlandic honor.
Anders Dam we are right, neither you nor anyone else on the board should be a member of the board, but immediately set your mandate free.
But we are wrong, so help us understand the law, since we are obviously not as smart as you Anders Dam
We want to give you our hand, but you have to receive it.
And then will we apologize for teasing you, in this little fight, but what to do when it’s the mouse against the elephant and the elephant just steps on one.
ANDERS NUMMERET ER 22227713 RING
WE HAVE TRIED AND TRIED TO RETURN HANDS BUT JYSKE BANK REFUSES ANY FORM FOR DIALOGUE THEREFORE, THIS STOCK IS TO FIND ON BANKNYT DK
Since May 2016, have the customer, been trying to shout up
the total Group management in Jyske Bank unsuccessfully.
Therefore some cars are driving around with these, free advertising for jyske bank A/S Denmark.
Thes advertising is to show that this danish bank, is totally indifferent that the bank's customer is being exposed to fraud by the jyske bank
/
CUSTOMER IS ONLY TRYING TO GET INTO DIALOGUE
WHICH BANK HAVE REFUSED SINCE 2016
And instead the bank continues, what the customer calls, gross exploitation of the bank's power, to continue the fraud, which even the Danish police refuse to investigate.
The customer has for over 3 years. yell up like here.
Just to get the Danish bank jyske bank, to stop the bank crafty and very gross, fraud against the bank's small customer.
It has been impossible to enter into dialogue with the bank's management in order to talk about the bank's fraud so that this could be stopped.
/
The Bank Board Member Philip Baruch wrote, May 31, 2016
This was after the customer's first direct contact the bank's executive chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam. May 19, 2016 and May 25, 2016.
"just 2 of a lot of inquiries, which the bank May 31, 2016 writes they do not want to receive."
The customer wrote 18, may 2016, and directly asked the bank's corporate management
Appendix 66. "That the customer meant to be exposed to a huge fraud"
/
And asks for proof May 25, 2016 Appendix 68
That the customer has taken out the underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, which was otherwise offered on 20 May 2008. Appendix Y.
Appendix 82 Here we ask the bank employee, on April 21, 2016 to prove that the alleged loan of DKK 4,328,000 is repayable and rescheduled, as alleged
Appendix D.
But get no answers we have many times in the past tried to get some attention, but this the bank refused to give us. November 17, 2015 Appendix 90.
/
We fight against dishonesty in this big Danish bank, apparently living by lying to their customers.
Should we really be the only one who are exposed to such fraud in this Danish bank
Join the court
September 30 and October 1, 2019
both days at. 9 am in court viborg
The case BS 1-698/2015
Is about fraud and fake
which we ourselves have had to present to the court December 28, 2018 Appendix 100. and 101. with Annexes 28 to 101 presented
/
/
FACTUAL INFORMATION IS & AND CLAIM'S CLAIM
For an alleged interest rate swap Appendix 1. date August 16, 2008
IS NOT IT CUSTOMER APPROVED FROM AUGUST 15, 2008.
AND THE CLAIMED BORROWING LOAN OF DKK 4,328,000
AS OFFERED ANNEX Y. DOES NOT EXIST
WHEN THE BIG DANISH BANK WRITTEN FEBRUARY 19, 2010.
That the customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000
And swapped this loan with Jyske bank. Appendix 30.
WHICH IS SHORT AFTER CUSTOMER NOVEMBER 26, 2009. BECOME VERY SICK.
AFTER A BRAIN BLEEDING. AND THEN WERE SICK FOR SEVERAL YEARS AFTER
See Appendix 93. 94. 95. 96. 97
Our lawyer, believed that these appendices could harm our case by presenting them, but we believe these appendices precisely prove that Jyske bank, in bad faith, has cynically exploited a very ill customer, to make more money.
WHEN JYSKE BANK CLAIMS IN THEIR PROPOSED ANNEXES D. date 10 SEPTEMBER 2015. TO LOAN ON. DKK 4,328,000 DKK has been rescheduled.
IT WOULD BE LYING ABOUT THE COURT, IF NO LOAN IS FOUND RESCHEDULED.
AS CLAIMED Appendix D.
/
As the customer allegations have still not been submitted in the closing plea of December 18, 2018
And as the bank December 28, 2018, it continues what the customer in his claim holds is fraud.
Choose the Customer himself to present their allegations, which is in testimony to the court, by Appendix 100 and Appendix 101 on December 28, 2018.
/
Information / Evidence, around the interest rate swap
That Annex E.5 of DKK 4,328,000 as of August 15, 2008, the approved swap for the Offer is Appendix Y.
THE SWAP IS ONLY if the customer, chooses to take the offered loan of the 4,328,000. DKK date 20 May 2008 Annex Y.
Regardless, Jyske Bank itself chooses August 16, 2008
Self choose to make to make an new and number 2, interest rate swap.
So that between August 16, 2008 and December 30, 2008, there are a full 2 interest rate swaps for a loan offer. Appendix Y. DKK 4,328,000
which the customer asks Jyske Bank to prove.
WHAT THE BANK REFUSES.
/
ANNEX 30 and ANNEX D.
WHEN JYSKE BANK CLAIMS TO THE COURT
HAVE BORROWED 4.328.000 AND SUBSEQUENTLY CHANGED THE LOAN
That the customer had borrowed DKK 4,328,000 and this was exchanged with Jyske bank, by swapping interest Appendix 1.
So the bank must not lie to make more money
/
which Jyske bank claims the customer has repatriated, and then switched, to another loan in Nykredit.
The customer asks both the bank's lawyers and the bank's employees, before
The customer again asks the management, to prove that the customer has made 2 swaps for this alleged underlying loan, in the large Danish Bank Nykredit
As the group has claimed in the case, since it was opened in 2013. in the Banking Institutions Board chase328/2013
Where the bank in Appendix 2. 3. and 4. on page 5. item 17. writes. that if the customer complains about the bank it must happen there.
Jyske bank requests that the case be rejected, as the customer is a company
/
Note on page 1. of the 3 Appendices, all of which are addressed to a company
So the bank is misleading their customers, right from the start
"before the customer knows that they are subject to gross fraud"
to complain about where the bank will reject the case, and hope to be able to make the case outdated.
/
But even though Jyske bank In an email from Appendix 30.
dated February 19, 2010 claims the customer has borrowed the 4,328,000
And in another mail. Appendix D. dated January 9, 2012.
"presented by Jyske Bank September 10, 2015.
/
When the Jyskebank claims 10 september 2015 that the underlying loan, has been rescheduled
The customer claims and submits that Jyske Bank bank is lying to the court.
/
It's been uphill, just to get Nykredit bank to tell the truth
when we ask Nykredit Bank if we have borrowed 4,328,000 and whether we have changed this loan, and when it should have changed
But just like Jyske bank, Nykredit chooses not to answer, that's why we sue Nykredit bank since they have to tell us, about has we borrowed 4,328,000 in Nykredit as Jyske Bank has claimed.
This was very strange for Nykredit to answer.
But then we got a meeting with the bank.
And Nykredit's lawyer Mette Egholm Nielsen also very clearly told, that Nykredit would not deliver a shoot against Jyske bank.
After a week we manage to get Nykredit confirmed
that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit See Appendix 28. from October 18, 2016
JYSKE BANK LYING, AND JYSKE BANK LYING FOR THE COURT.
The Bank Board Member Philip Baruch wrote, May 31, 2016
This was after the customer’s first direct contact the bank’s executive chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam May 19, 2016
And May 25, 2016. Where the customer wrote and directly asked the bank’s corporate management to prove.
That the customer has taken out the underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit which Jyske bank claims the customer has repatriated, and then switched, to another loan in Nykredit
A case that the Danish state. FSA knows very well.
But choose NOT to interfere
And leds the Danish bank, Jyske bank, continue the fraud.
And lets let it be up to the little customer, in civil court self to stop the fraudulent bank’s fraud.
REMEMBER THIS Call IS ONLY
A CALL FOR THE DANISH BANKS NOT TO LIE.
And not to cheat their customers.
AND JYSKE BANK GROUP MANAGEMENT PLEASE TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS.
AND PLEASE DO NOT TAKE YOUR HAND IN OTHERS COOKIES.
A case that the Danish state knows very well
But choose to let the Danish bank Jyske bank continue the scam.
Oh let it be up to the little customer even in court, to stop the fraudulent bank's fraud.
REMEMBER THIS IS ONLY A CALL, FOR THE DANISH BANKS TO NOT LIE
AND SO TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS.
SO PLEASE TELL THEM WHEN THEY ARE GETTING HANDED IN OTHERS COOKIES
Here you can read our claims, against Jyske Bank and Group Management, for rough fraud Which was presented to our lawyer on 6 December 2018 The 40 pages are a little down the page. BANKNYT
Jyske bank runs fraudulent banking against the customer here.
The problem with corporate management is that they will continue the bank’s fraud crimes.
Therefore, the case will come before the Court of Viborg 30-09-2019 at. 9.00
And the client’s lawyer is very clearly requested to present the case as the one on this page is focussed, to be fraud and fake
/
Jyske bank’s board of directors are all offered to be able to admit the bank’s fraud crimes.
And then release their mandate freely.
No one in the board wanted this offer, which is why the case is stepping up.
This is how to be a customer of the Danish banks who will not comply with Danish law
This case is about the credibility of Jyske Bank
Follow the case and look up on twitter
SEE CLAIMS as we in Danish can best explain
HERE ARE THE APPLICATIONS SUPPLIED BY THE COURT TO THE COURT 28-12-2018
FOR A KNOWLEDGE EXPLANATION ANNEXES 100 and 101 28-12-2018
A P Møller Maersk og ATP er nogle af dem der er storaktionær i banker som Jyske Bank og Jyske Bank Banker der er kendte for Hvidvaskning og grove Svig forbrydelser.
Besøg Banknyt.dk
hvis du vil vide mere om hvordan jyske bank udsætter deres kunder for bedrageri og bare griner af deres kunder.
SEE ANNEXES TO THE CLAIM EXPLAINED 06-12-2018 parts there are submitted 28-12-2018
SEE STATEMENT THAT IS EXPLAINED 06-12-2018 parts of it are submitted 28-12-2018
30-09-2019 and 01-10-2019 Main negotiation starts both days at. 9.00
Jyske bank We will see you on September 30 in Viborg.
Hope you not will be able to continue your fraud.
In which case we can one be sure that we have a rule of law here in Denmark.
Anders Dam now read what we wrote to the group 20-06-2019 again.
NEWS FROM THE DANISH BANKS
The case here is not about money laundering,
That Den Danske Bank and Nordea have made.
But it's about simple fraud against the bank customer, by lying even to court.
For In Denmark, no one is shaking his head, when the banks are making scams.
It's just about money, no matter how it is obtained Here,
a customer in Jyske Bank has been exposed to fraud for 11 years. and in this case the group's management has known about the fraud at least since May 2016
Follow the case in Viborg courtroom 30-09-2019
case number BS 1-698 / 2015
Welcome to Denmark’s Criminal Banks, which deceive the bank’s customers. IN DANISH
Danmarks nok største forbryder organisation, må uden tvivl være den Danske Bank, JYSKE BANK. som fortsætter bankens svig velvidende at det er bedrageri, mod kunder der forsøger at råbe koncernen op. 28-01-2019
Kunder går til angreb imod Danmarks måske største kriminelle virksomhed, JYSKE BANK og den lige så kriminelle bestyrelse, som ved Anders Christian Dam står bag fortsat million bedrageri imod bankens kunde.
Se opslag 20-06-2019 med breve til jyske bank, som anmodes om ikke at lave mere svindel, samt vi beder 24-06-2019 vore advokat om dato for et, møde til gennemgang af beviserne mod svindlerene fra jyske bank.
Mød svindlerene fra jyske bank her 89898989
Kontakt jyske bank, så står de måske også klar til at bedrage dig.
Koncernbestyrelsen ved Anders Dam mener ikke loven gælder for jysk bank, og bedrageri er blevet en helt naturlig måde for jyske bank at svindle bankens kunder.
Kunden som fangede jyske bank, og bankens bestyrelse i millionsvindel af lille virksomhed, ved godt at de er nogle hårdkogte kriminelle i jyske bank, kriminelle som kunderne selv må stoppe, da politiet lader til at dække over jyske Banks fortsatte massive bedrageri.
Bestyrelsen er ligeglade, de har kunder nok i jyske bank, så hvis nogle få kunder opdager, at jyske bank laver massivt bedrageri imod bankens kunder, har jyske bank kontakt med myndighederne, som hjælper jyske bank til ikke at blive efterforsket, for bankens fortsatte million svindel mod Jyske Banks egne kunder.
Anders Dam Jyske Bank leads the bank’s fraud, along with the management.
🙂
In this Danish bank, the management is doing giant fraud against customer, together in a union.
While other Danish banks only make money laundering, makes Jyskebank also document false and fraud.
Since the Danish police do not want to stop the banks’ obvious fraud, against their customers.
Can we who are being deceived, only cry out to warn others against Danish banks like this Jyske Bank.
We have tried to talk to the criminal gang, JYSKEBANK since May 2016. But the gang will not talk to their victim.
🙂
If it is just a matter of the bank’s foundation is misunderstood, and the bank jyske bank does not itself believe, that the management are together in unity, and does and continues fraud against their customers.
Why does the group jyske bank refuse to talk with us, but continues fraud against their customers.
🙂
When conversation promotes understanding.
🙂
For over 3 years we have tried to enter into a dialogue with the bank, who stubbornly refuses to talk to us.
We should look at the matter together.
And if we, as a customer, are wrong, we are the first to apologize
We ask the Jyske Bank to receive our request, and the court’s offer to meet, and together solve the jyske bank’s problems.
We therefore ask the board of directors, take its responsibility and loosen this small disagreement.
Best regards May 28, 2019
Storbjerg Erhverv
Management
Søvej 5. Hornbæk.
Phone 22227713
We just wanted to have Denmark’s second largest bank JyskeBank, AndersDam to stop the bank’s and the board’s gross fraud, against us customer.
Even if the individual management members, are offered to admit their involvement in fraud. have thet all declined the offer.
And still covers the managing director Anders Christian Dam’s way of defrauding the bank’s customers.
🙂
The bank group has been accustomed to continuing the bank’s fraud since May 2016
Why does the bank not only admit that this time the fraud was not only discovered, but the customer has collected an overwhelming evidence against Anders Dam, Philip Baruch, and many more, who all together have made the scam possible for a decade
🙂
Why does Jyskebank continue fraud?
when the bank can begin to admitting, the bank’s many years of fraud, before we meet in the courtroom, to get the bank’s fraud stopped
🙂
How many other customers, like us, must fight against the Danish Fraud Bank Jyske Bank to stop the bank’s fraud.
We have since May 2016 written to the management In jyskebank, which unfortunately chooses to continue the bank’s huge fraud in union.
🙂
Ask some of the owners, such as ATP pension & A. P Møller, “A. P. Moller-Maersk” why they support Danish criminal banks, as a shareholder In Jyske Bank
Offered to Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors Admit fraud and step out of the board The offer is in one of the letters presented in court The entire board refused to admit all, and stopped Jyske bank fraud.
UFATTELIGT at JYSKE BANK stadig 28-06-2019 helt bevidst bedrager deres kunder.
At koncern lederen Anders Dam, ikke indgik dialog 19. Maj 2016, da han som øverste chef af koncernen, direkte bliver oplyst, at jyske bank nok stod bag et kæmpe bedrageri imod bankens kunde.
🙂
Her 3 år efter vi oplyste ledelsen om bedraget, er Jyske bank koncernen stadig iskold, og ledelsen fortsætter koldt og kynisk bankens mange årige bedrageri mod deres kunder.
De nye trøjer og mærker som kommer på stadig flere biler, er kun for at skabe dialog.
🙂
DET ER JO BARE FOR SJOV, HVILKET JYSKE BANK SIKKERT ER MEGET ENIG I.
🙂
Vi tænker at sende en pakke til koncernen ledelsen ved Anders Christian Dam.
Indeholdende
1 kuglepen fra mobilix teleselskab.
Slogan: samtale fremmer forståelsen.
Men naturligvis en trøje i størrelse L.
Med teksten:
Kunde beder jyske bank stoppe svindel
Anders Dam ring 22227713
Banknyt dk
“Vi deler naturligvis alle breve.”
🙂
Selv om jysk banken står bag million svindel af bankens kunder, er det vel ret normalt siden bankens ledelse fortsætter svindlen, men bare understreger at jyske Banks svindel sker i forening, og den samlede Konsernledelsen står bag.
🙂
🙂
Får Anders Dam en reklame trøje
Så kan bandelederen i den kriminelle jyske bank, Anders Dam jo tage den på, og altid vide at vi ønsker DIALOG
ANDERS DAM ring nu 22227713
Lad os mødes, og sammen se hvad der er rigtigt i vores egne fremlagte beviser i sagen mod jyske bank, for svig og falsk.
🙂
Jyske bank en anderledes bank, en bank der står bag million bedrageri af bankens kunder.
🙂
Er jyske bank ikke enige så ring, og lad os mødes og ved dialog rette op på eventuelt små misforståelser og fejl.
Bedste hilsner til en total ligeglad jyske bank, som sætter bedrageri højst, frem for hæderlighed ærlighed troværdighed
fra
Storbjerg Erhverv
Søvej 5. 3100 Hornbæk
22227713
Ps
Efter jyske Banks tv fulgte, os og ikke ville være ved at jyske bank bedrager deres kunder
Og derefter så blokerer os, stikker hoved i jorden, får ikke jyske Banks svindel til at forsvinde.
Vi skal altså tale om dette her, siger de kunder der er udsatte for jyske bank svindel
Støtter Jyske Bank Boxen Herning, jyske Banks forretningsmetoder.
Jyske bank fortsætter bankens bedrageri ved hjælp af Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater som gerne lyver for retten
Hvordan kan man få kontakt og dialog, med en bank hvis ledelse står bag bankens bedrageri.
Vi ønsker jo bare at ledelsen taler med os, når ja og stopper med at lyve og bedrage os, derfor ville vi helst tale med jyske bank selv, frem for de barnlige og nok morsomme reklamer.
Dialog Dialog og Dialog det er det vi ønsker at jyske bank skal forstå.
Når ledelsen siden 19 maj 2016 har kunne stanse jyske banks svindel mod kunde, men bevidst valgt at fortsætte bedrageri, viser det fundamentet i jyske bank som råddent.
Når politiet ikke vil hjælpe med at stanse bankers bedragerier, må andre jo gøre det, ledelsen i jyskebank griner nok over, at det i Danmark ikke er muligt at få politiets hjælp, når de Danske banker laver bedrageri.
Anders Dam kan jo bare ringe, siger en små sur kunde. Der er jo bare et par millioner, jyske bank har svindlet den lille kunde for, ved løgn, dokumentfalsk, misbrug af udløbet fuldmagt, overpant, udnyttelse, tvang når ja og bedrageri osv.
Få reklamer til bilen og et par gode flasker vin oven i.
Hvis nogle i jyske Banks koncernledelse, ikke snart har opdaget, at vi ikke er som de andre kunder, banken snyder og bedrager, så vil i snart opdage at vi bliver ved og ved og ved. 🙂 for vi ønske altså kontakt.
/
Når lederen Anders Dam tror det hjælper at stikke hovedet i busken, og der ikke kan blive set.
Og måske ligefrem håber at bedrageri kan betale sig for jyske bank,
Eller måske ledelse ligefrem håber, vi bliver kørt over af en lastbil inden 30/9-2019
Således koncernen direktøren CEO Anders Dam ikke skal blive totalt ydmyget i retten, når kunden forklare hvordan jyske bank i over er årti har stået bag million bedrageri mod deres kunde.
Kunden siger
Så køb heller en lotto kupon Anders Dam, der er nok større chance for at vinde, end den ydmygelse det vil være for jyske Bank, at blive knallert af den lille prut af en kunde, der opklarede det bedrageri ledelsen i jyske bank fortsat støtter.
/
Anders og jer andre i jyske bank, ved det virker temmelig tosset, men 19 maj i år. var det 3 år siden, vi oplyste koncernenledelsen, DIRIKTIONEN og LUND ELMER SANDAGER advokater, at vi nok var udsat for et kæmpe bedrageri.
🙁
Tænker jyske bank lyver, og behandle alle kunder på samme måde, for at snyde eller skuffe i retsforhold.
Siden koncernen nægtede dialog, efter vi 19. maj 2016 oplyser koncernen ledelsen, om jyske banks bedrageri, så vælger bankens ledelse kynisk bare at fortsætter det meget grove og udspekuleret bedrageri mod kunde.
🙂
Tager vi fejl er nummeret stadig 22227713
Ring og få et dialogmøde, således fejl kan rettes, og vi undgår misforståelser som Morten Ulrik Gade skrev i november 2015.
🙂
Vi siger til jyske Bank
Det her er godt nok noget banken kan grine af mange år frem i tiden.
Men det er nu også sørgeligt at de danske banker, er så kriminelle som vi her beviser jyske bank koncernen er.
Godt hjulpet af deres advokater og Lund Elmer Sandager, der tilbage holder beviser og lyver overfor retten i retsforhold.
Hvis banken eller andre er uenig !
Så ring 22227713 og lade os se om vi har misforstået beviserne for bankens bedrageri.
🙂
Når vi fremlægger jyske bank som kriminel, er det så falsk eller sandt ?.
Når kunder er udsat for bedrageri, og har fremlagt det for ledelsen, som lader det fortsætte, hvad gør det så ledelsen til ?.
JYSKE BANKS KONCERN LEDELSE STÅR BAG BANKENS MILLION BEDRAGERI IMOD LILLE KUNDE
Jyske banks koncernen bag masivt bedrageri mod kunde, det er bare det kunden ønsker, at ledelsen hjælper med at BEKRÆFTE eller afkræfte.
Ledelsen i jyske bank inkl. Den ordstyrende formand CEO Anders Christian Dam
Tror åbenbart bedrageri mod bankens kunder er i orden, bare man er magtfuld nok.
Jyske Bank svindlerne som er i foreningen ved alle, både de ansatte og godt hjulpet af advokat firmaet Lund Elmer Sandager, at kunden er udsat for SVINDEL
Kunde fanger jyske bank koncernen i millionsvindel.
Vi ønsker fred men ledelsen i jyske bank ønsker at fortsætte million bedrageri af lille kunde.
I krig og fred, må David alene kæmpe imod Goliat, David er nok lille, men har beviser for Jyske Banks million bedrageri imod lille kunde
Bestil støttte trøjer mod de kriminelle Danske banker på 22227713
Trøjer leveres i størrelser S. M. L. XL.
Warning don’t trust banks in denmark.
Retten skriver 12. April til JYSKE BANK og kunde at det stadig er muligt med retsmæling.
Kunde er interesseret i at få RETSMÆLING og mødes med jyske bank, skriver derfor 16. April 2019 til retten i Viborg.
Anders Dam og den øvrige bestyrelse i jyske bank, har ingen problemer med at udsætte selv deres små kunder for groft bedrageri.
Det ville klæde banken at forsøge at bedrage kunder som A.P Møller istedet, men her er det nok for svært for jyske bank at lave svindel og bagefter skjule det.
Jyske bank og Lund Elmer Sandager taget i at lyve for retten.
Jyske bank har 25. Juli 2019 stadig ikke svaret.
Kunde mener ikke det kan være rigtigt at de forudrettet efter at blive udsat for massivt banksvindel, selv øknomisk skal bekoste advokater for at stanse kriminelle bankers bedrageri, da dette er et samfunds problem.
Kunde forsøger da også igen 25. April at skrive til Anders Dam “altså knap 3 år efter første brev til Koncernledelsen”
Anders Dam tal med os, har jyske bank intet gjort galt, ingen love og regler overtrådt 🙂 hvad er så problemet.
Har jyske bank ikke lavet / laver Bedrageri. Dokumentfalsk og løjet overfor retten, så mød os så vi får stoppet disse opslag hvis der bare er tale om misforståelser.
Danish Parliament politician, have before asked, if the Danish bank “JYSKEBANK” is a criminal organization
This is confirmed after investigating a massive fraud against bank customer.
🙂
25-04-2019 forsøger vi igen at få ledelsen til at holde op med at bedrage jyske banks kunder.
VI PRØVER FAKTISK DIALOG
Her skrev vi til Jyske Bank koncern ledelse 27-12-2018
FOR VI VIL RIGTIGT GERNE I DIALOG MED KONCERNEN
Her skrev vi til Jyske bank 18-01-2019
Svaret fra Konsernledelse er altid det samme, INGEN SVAR
Mens Jyske banks ledelse fortsætter bankens bedrageri mod bankens kunde
In this case the board is united together about the continued fraud, against the bank’s customer.
CEO Anders Christian Dam, cannot see anything wrong with @Jyskebank and that there should be something wrong with lying, even if the bank has lied in writing to the Danish court.
🙂
As jyske bank presented manipulated evidence in court, and hidden appendix, it would show that the bank lied.
That the bank has abused the expired proxies, and even presents them without informing court the true date, is foolishly stupid, but the bank probably did not expect, to be taken for fraud either.
But here’s a bank that can’t count
JYSKE BANK
🙂
🙂
Banks must only think of their financial opportunities to benefit
their shareholder, such as ATP / A.P. Møller / pension Denmark
Follow the banks trial, a fraud case in Viborg court BS 1-698/2015
First day of trial is 30th of September
BS 1-698/2019
🙂
When Danish banks will not stop fraud against their customers
And the police will not investigate Danish banks that are reported to deceive their customers.
🙂
Then the bank’s customers have to fight harder to stop danish bank fraud.
It should be the Danish Ministry of Justice, who stepped in and asked the police to investigate the reported and continued fraud.
And not the customers themselves
as here’s up, against one billion companie as JYSKE BANK
🙂
Imagine, all these announcements are in order to enter into a dialogue with the group management, which has been attempted since 2016 May
🙂
Have just bet the bank admit
1.
There is no underlying loan for some interest rate swaps with jyske bank
Appendix 30.
Appendix 28.
2.
Nothing underlying loan has been changed
Appendix D.
3.
It is only made an agreement on an interest rate swap.
Appendix E.5 date 15-07-2008
And this agreement is closed
Appendix 29. Date 30-12-2008
That the bank itself, makes a new interest swap Appendix 1.
Without none conversation with the customer, and then lied afterwards this underlay loans as takken.
The customer must sue Nykredit bank, to find out if the loan has existed before Nykredit will respond, and admit there is no loan, that jyske bank has lied about.
Appendix 28.
🙂
🙂
www.banknyt.dk
@Finansmin @finanstilsyndk @FinansBreaking @finanstilsynet.no #China #Financial #Finans #Banks #Police #Government #News #Press #Denmark #Investments #Stocks #Jyskebank #DRnyheder #News #Share #Pol #dkpol
Fight against a criminal Danish bank
Follow the little man’s battle against Denmark’s second largest bank, which continues to cheat the customer.
But now the customer gets the case for court, after 11 years of fraud, a case there was launched in 2013 as Ref. 328/2013 in the Danish Complaints Board, and then into court 2015. as case BS 1-698/2015 Viborg cort.
🙂
An extremely burdensome cause to be the victim of, the bank Jyske bank does not care, this kind of small criticism does not have any significance for the bank
🙂
🙂
And what is the customer shouts about ?, as the bank is so cold facing
A case against large Danish bank, for rough document false and fraud
Fraud which the district attorney refused to investigate, and #jyskebank themselves refuses to stop
Moving in to the court for a judgment. September 30, 2019
🙂
The Executive Board of the large Danish banks is rewarded, to earn income and that without the shareholders like ATP. A P Møller
asks questions
-
-
- Siden maj 2016
-
- Har en samlede Koncernledelse, kunne opklare og stoppe bedrageri.
-
- .
-
- Men det vil Anders Dam ikke
-
- –
-
- Derfor nærmer vi os hovedforhandling i sag og jyskebanks svig mod kunder
-
- –
-
- Svig og bedrageri er det samme
-
- –
-
KLIK OG SE FLERE BILAG
why does Danish state not stop criminal Danish banks
Big Danish bank’s fraud, the case
It is also about document false, lying to court, abused proxy, The evidence speaks for themselves.
-
- Til #Justitsministeriet @SorenPape
-
- Vi beder @folketinget stoppe stor dansk banks fortsatte bedrageri af kunder
- Om den #JyskeBanks bedrageri, med henvisning til #loven og henviser til alle også banker skal overholde loven
Synes du at det er ok at danske banker som er støttet af regeringen.
Laver og fortsætter bedrageri mod bank kunder.
Og at koncernledelsen nægte at stoppe åbenlyst bedrageri, startet med dokumentfalsk.
Hvis du støtter bankers bedrageri mod bankkunde, er jyske bank aktier et godt valg.
🙂
VI ØNSKER KUN
AT KOMME I KONTAKT MED CEO ANDERS DAM
Derfor disse opråb.
–
GIV OS NU DET TILBAGE
SOM JYSKE BANK HAR STJÅLLET FRA OS
🙂
🙂
Hovedforhandling
I jyske Banks svig forbrydelser sker i Viborg
12. April 2019 Skriver retten at der stadig er mulighed for retsmægling
Ja tak
KLIK PÅ BILLED og læs mere
16. April 2019 svare vi retten at vi gerne vil mødes med jyske bank
For at være med i retsmægling
–
KLIK på billed og se bilag
🙂
With regard to the bank’s final remarks, Lund Elmer Sandager refused the lawyers to answer something on February 19. 2019
Which we were informed on March 22 that Jyske bank had failed with the bank’s final comments, to our Annex 100 and 101.
Strange, when this particular explanation provided, contains evidence, that the bank’s fraud is carried out by the entire board
Jyske bank will still not speak to us, which we do not understand, when all in the bank group should know everything about the fraud is not allowed, according to the Danish criminal law
Dækker politiet og stadsanklageren over danske bankers bedrageri imod kunder
–
Se link opslag KLIK
30. September
&
1. Oktober 2019
CEO Anders Dam
Siger nej tak til dialog med sur kunde, efter bankens mange års bedrageri.
Ønsker ikke at tale med kunde, men beder om en dom i den sag BS-1-698/2015
Hvori Koncernledelsen og Anders Dam af kunden anklages, for meddelagtighed i groft svig
Hvilket er udført af den samlede koncernledelsen i forening. KLIK PÅ BILLED OG SE LINK SAGENS FREMLAGTE BILAG.
🙂
The Danish bank, Jyske Bank, chose not to stop fraud against the bank’s customer, despite the board’s knowledge of fraud least since May 2016
Here has the group management itself, with the group manager
CEO Anders Christian Dam
Refused to stop fraud against the bank’s customer.
Therefore we say that the crime is performed In a union.
🙂
The management who just does what they usually do, looks forward to the fight in Viborg court.
We only have a letter from jyske banks lawyer Lund Elmer Sandager Philip Baruch, back from 2016
Where the bank rejects a settlement.
🙂
So now we will look forward to meeting the Big Danish bank in court.
September 30. and October 1. 2019
If you have questions
0045 22227713 customer
0045 89898989 jyske bank
/
Only if the judge disagrees with the bank, and judges the bank according to the customer’s accusation against the jyskebank
Those that the customer himself, has presented the court. December 28th.
Appendices 100 and 101.
Only to get the evidence of fraud and false accusations, presented to the court, while it still was achievable.
/
The customer who started a case in the Appeals Board in 2013, and had to continue the case before the court in 2015.
First In early 2016, we discovered that the bank has manupled with evidence.
/
The bank customer did not know that the bank has lied, and deceived the company / customer
Who has been ill since 2009 after a brain bleeding, and was just an easy victim.
🙁
And therefore did not know, that the bank have lied in writing
To the Appeals Board in 2013 and 2014
But also lied to the Danish court since 2015
/
The main debate in the fraud case is now set for 30 September 2019
BS 1-698 / 2015 Viborg Court
It is an open trial, everyone is welcome
/
In court, the customer will explain in 1. hour.
How it the Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank got success to deceive, the small business customer for over 10 years
An obvious deception by forgery, and exploitation of expired proxies, which the bank also has corrected in signed the document, after the document was signed by the customer.
/
It is about danish banks
Can you trust them, when even the danish police refuse to investigate Danish banks, for reported exploitation and fraud.
🙂
At banknyt.dk
You will find links and many listings that have been shared since 2013
they are in Danish.
So if you can trust on the Danish banks
That you will know after the case is presented
🙂
Hovedforhandling i stor svindel sag mod jyske Banks kunde
30. September &
1. Oktober KLIK OG SE SAGEN
Læs artiklen om vores måde at standse Jyske Banks mange årige bedrageri
–
At koncernen er bedøvende ligeglade er jo som det er, så godt vi snart skal starte forberedelse
Great Danish bank’s management from #Jyskebank in bad faith, and continues the bank’s fraud for millions
Which is planned to last for several years. “20 years”
🙂
We are talking about a bank the Danish state has supported economic, with loans through several bank packages.
Maybe the bank would like to thank the Danish government / Danish state, by making fraud against customers. 🙂 just kidding
🙂
The big question then is how many more people like us, are exposed to the same exploit and fraud, in Danish banks.
Maybe that’s what the Danish state wants to help Jyske Bank cover?
We do not know, but it should be investigated whether there is corruption in Denmark, which has been successful in hiding.
🙂
This fraud case at Jyske Bank, can very easily be organized, by the board / management, and this is possibly the reason, why this Danish bank continues fraud, even several years after the bank’s fraud has been discovered, by the customer himself
🙂
The problem in Denmark
Is just that the Danish authorities, do not want to investigate Danish banks’ fraud, and therefore refuse to investigate fraud reports.
Therefore, it may be the EU commission itself to be informed
🙂
Do you really think cars like this would drove around
And with advertisements that the jyske Bank is lying and cheating?
That it is for free advertising for Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske bank, if there was nothing about the talk
JYSKE BANK OG DERES BESTYRELSE NÆGTER AT STOPPE BEDRAGERI MOD BANKENS KUNDE UDEN EN DOM.
Dato for hovedforhandling er nu sat 30/9 & 1/10 2019 Viborg ret
Link til Twitter
Kom med i retten Viborg
BS 1-698/2015
🙂
Vi afventer 20-03-2019.
Stadig på oplysninger om
?
Har jyske bank svaret 19-02 deres afsluttende bemærkninger
–
Og hvad har banken svaret ?
–
Hvornår starter forberedelsen
?
Har intet hørt siden 9 januar, og vil jo gerne vide hvad jyske bank har at sige til anklager mod jyske bank for dokumentfalsk og bedrageri
BILAG 100 & 101
–
POLITIET HAR FÅET BEVISERNE MEN ER PASSIVE DA STATSADVOKATEN NÆGTER AT EFTERFORSKE BANKERS BEDRAGERI MOD DERES KUNDER.
Læs historien klik her
–
Sådan virker jyske banks hvidvaske maskine
Jyske bank fik første millionbøde for hvidvask
Men hvorfor er ingen banker mon efterforsket af dansk politi
dækker statsadvokaten over der største ?
🙂
Kunde må selv kæmpe for at stanse jysk bedrag
🙁
En lille sag om svig / bedrageri der ligger i byretten.
Men sagen hører bestemt hjemme i strafferetten.
Problemet er bare at her står der en bank bag bedrageri mod kunde , og så dækker Danmarks elite over det.
Jyske Banks Koncernledelse
Ved
Sven Buhrækall
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen
Rina Asmussen
Philip Baruch
Jens Borup
Keld Norup
Christina Lykke Munk
Johnny Christensen
Marianne Lillevang
Anders Dam
Niels Erik Jakobsen
Per Skovhus
Peter Schleidt
–
Er alle sammen tilbudt at indrømme bedrageri og mulighed for at komme ud af det fortsatte bedrageri forhold mod deres kunde
🙁
Bestyrelsen afviste at underskrive, og valgte i forening at fortsætte Jyske Banks bedrageri mod lille erhvervs kunde.
–
Politiet er ligeglade med kriminelle bestyrelses medlemmer i store banker, disse må ikke efterforskes.
–
Derfor nægter stadsadvokaten at se på beviserne mod banken for groft bedrageri
–
Vi afventer her 1. Marts stadig på at modtage Bestyrelsens afsluttende bemærkninger fra 19. Februar
–
Og få datoer for hovedforhandling.
Vi tænker at
Anders Dam og
Philip Baruch
Fra Jyske Banks bestyrelse, vil forsøge at unddrage sig som vidne i sagen mod jyske bank for svig / bedrageri
Men grundet sagens beskaffenhed, og disse vidner er vigtige for sagens belysning, vil vi naturligvis forvente vores advokat er på forkant
Når han indkalder de vidner, vi har anmodet skal de alle naturligvis møde op.
Uagtet at Eks. både
Anders Dam & Philip Baruch efterfølgende, risiker en straf.
🙂
§ 171. En parts nærmeste har ikke pligt til at afgive forklaring som vidne.
1) udsætte vidnet selv for straf eller tab af velfærd eller
MEN
Stk. 4. I de i stk. 2, nr. 3, nævnte tilfælde kan retten endvidere pålægge vidnet at afgive forklaring,
såfremt vidnet har udført foranstaltninger som nævnt i § 754 a, og sagens beskaffenhed og dens betydning for vedkommende part eller samfundet findes at berettige dertil.
Velkommen i en anderledes bank, vi kørte en tur til Silkeborg, for Vestergade 10-16 desværre var Anders Dam ikke på sit kontor, lyset var slukket, så vi må kører igen med uforrettet sag.
Imens vi gør klar til krig mod den anden største bank i Danmark, JYSKE BANK for svig / bedrageri.
Fortsætter jyske bank bare deres helt bevidste bedrageri mod os kunder.
🙂
Men måske lidt sjovt, for synes at have sammen handling:
Som da Kennedy bad sovjetunionen at stoppe deres skibe med atomvåben, der var på vej mod Cuba
Her valgte sovjetunionen at vende om, for at undgå krig.
Vi kan kun håbe på at Jyske Banks ledelse deriblandt deres ordstyrende formand også besinder sig, og stopper bedrageriet mod bankens kunder.
Ellers kommer der krig, siger den lille kunde imod supermagten jyske bank 🙂
Se det som sjovt
MEN VI VIL IKKE BEDRAGES AF ANDERS DAM eller JYSKE BANK.
Vi ønsker bare at du #AndersDam taler med os, og vi sammen ser på det her.
Når jyske bank bedrager kunder, men ikke har opdaget det.
Kan banken jo heller ikke rette fejlen
Hjælp jyske bank
Oplys AKTIONÆRERNE om de vil hjælpe koncernledelsen, med at få øje på dette opslag, så vi ikke skal vente på en dommer stopper Danmarks anden største bank i at bedrage kunder
-
- NÅR VI OPLYSER AT
-
- DEN SAMLEDE JYSKE BANKS BESTYRELSE
-
- –
-
- #Sven Buhrækall
-
- #Kurt Bligaard Pedersen
-
- #Rina Asmussen
-
- #Philip Baruch
-
- #Jens Borup
-
- #Keld Norup
-
- #Christina Lykke Munk
-
- #Johnny Christensen
-
- #Marianne Lillevang
-
- #Anders Dam
-
- #Niels Erik Jakobsen
-
- #Per Skovhus
-
- #Peter Schleidt
-
- Er sammen i forening med Jyske Banks advokaters mange årig bedrageri mod bankens kunde.
-
- BESTYRELSEN STÅR BAG BEDRAGERI MOD VORES LILLE VIRKSOMHED.
-
- 🙂
-
- Hvilket vi har skrevet siden 2016, hvor vi har skrevet oplæg som dette, altså i snart 3 år.
-
- DET VIRKER RET UNDERLIGT
-
- At ingen i bestyrelsen har turdet svare os, eller har vist ønske om at stoppe bankens bedragerier
-
- Hvad siger det om Jyske Banks Koncernledelse ?
- #AndersChristianDam tag dig nu sammen 19. februar skal du svare retten på anklager om bankens grove svig ( bedrageri ) og falsk i de anklager vi har fremlagt retten 28-12-2018 i Bilag 100. & 101.
Klik på billed
og se de seneste fremlagte Bilag 28-101
.
Fremlagt 28 december 2018
–
Kopi af fremlagte Bilag 28-101. Blev sendt til Anders Dam 28 januar 2019 ( Bilag 102. )
Anders har denne gang valgt 1. Februar at svare, med at han ingen bemærkninger eller kommentar har, til den fremlagte vidneforklaring, med beviser for jyske Banks og koncernledelsens medvirken i bedrageri mod bankens kunde, anklager der er fremlagt koncernen med de fremlagte bilag.
–
Når Koncernledelsen i jyske bank stadig 2019 sammen i forening, står bag bedrageri imod bankens kunder.
–
Og ledelsen nægter at holde op med at bedrage deres kunder.
–
Så må sagen afgøres ved domstolen, da politiet nægte at stoppe banker i at lave BEDRAGERI.
–
Kunde er ikke i tivl, jyske banks bestyrelse står bag jyske Banks million bedrageri mod os som udvalgte kunder.
🙁
Svig mod kunder ? Kunde spørger koncernledelsen
.
Sven Buhrækall
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen
Rina Asmussen
Philip Baruch
Jens Borup
Keld Norup
Christina Lykke Munk
Johnny Christensen
Marianne Lillevang
Anders Dam
Niels Erik Jakobsen
Per Skovhus
Peter Schleidt
.
Om det er i orden at jyske bank lyver overfor deres kunder
.
For derefter at udsætte dem for bedrageri.
.
Synes AKTIONÆRERNE i jyske bank at koncernledelsen er uden ansvars for dette, fortsatte bedrageri
.
Jyske Banks bestyrelse fik svar frist til 19. Februar, vi har her 1 marts stadig ikke modtaget en kopi.
🙂
Selv om der findes en del personer som ikke ønsker, at bilag der beviser at jyske bank ved bestyrelsen og deres advokater, står bag dette modbydelige bedrageri mod bankens kunder, så er det 28-12-2018 blevet fremlagt
Bilag 100. Og 101. Er vores fremlæggelse af sagen mod jyske bank for et omfattende bedrageri, og svindel der er udført i forening af nogles af Danmarks rigste
Når rige bedrager fattige for at få mere, så forvente at i en dag grundet jeres grådighed vil blive opdaget
Den lille kunde i jyske bank gør noget ingen har gjort får, og tager kampen op i mod jyske bank bestyrelse
DETTE HER BEDRAGERI FOREGÅR I DANMARK
UANSET HVEM JYSKE BANK KONCERN HAR TILBUDT PENGE ELLER ARBEJDE
SÅ FORTSÆTTER VI KAMPEN
JYSKE BANK SKAL HAVE EN DOM FOR UFATTELIGT GROFT SVIG
OG BESTYRELSEN SAMT DERES ADVOKATER STILLES TIL ANSVAR, FOR DERES MEDVIRKEN I BEDRAGERI
Jyske bank er da ikke kriminelle vel ?
JO JYSKE BANK KONCERNEN
ER DYBT KRIMINELLE
Men spørg dem selv, og del svaret,
Brug linket klik på Anders Dam leder af denne kriminelle jyske bank.
–
Ding Dong er der nogle hjemme i #jysk #bank
Vores største ønske er jo bare at Jyske Banks direktion / ledelse
Senest 19 februar 2019.
Tager sit ansvar og tager stilling til
🙂
A.
Anders Dam
INDRØMMER OG UNDSKYLDER
1. Stopper med at lave bedrageri
2. Indrømmer udnyttelse
3. Indrømmer bedrageri
4. Indrømmer fuldmagts misbrug
5. Indrømmer dokument falsk
6. Undskylder for groft bedrageri
7. Anders Dam fyres / fratræder
8. Bestyrelsen fratræder / afsættes og udskiftes
SKRIV DET FØRST PÅ JERES HJEMMESIDE.
Så dropper vi jo skriveriet.
Eller
🙂
B.
Koncernledelsen benægter alt
Og skriver på jysk velkommen i jyske bank,
At jyske bank kun vil, stoppe bedrageri mod bankens kunder, hvis banken først dømmes for svig & falsk mod deres kunder, som det sker mod virksomheden her.
SÅ VI SNART FÅR DEN DOM
🙂
C.
Alle andre muligheder syntes at være udtømte.
Derfor skal sagen hurtigst muligt fremlægges dommeren til hovedforhandling.
Så kan vi få den dom Koncernen Ledelsen, så gerne vil have
Men som bangebuksen Anders Dam, ikke tør skrive.
–
19-02-2019
Dette er sidste dato, hvor vi ønsker at modtage en uforbeholden undskyldning, hvis ledelsen mod forventning vil give sådan en.
Altså ikke en beklagelse, den kan Anders Dam og Co. tørrer deres RØV i.
Jyske bank ka faktisk ikke længer undskylde bevidst bedrageri
–
Men de har fået en frist til 19 februar, til at indrømme og undskylde bedrageri
–
Herefter giver vi intet for bankens / direktionens søforklaringer
🙂
🙂
Medvirken til Jyske Banks fortsatte bedrageri er
Bestyrelsen ved :
Sven Buhrækall
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen
Rina Asmussen
Philip Baruch
Jens Borup
Keld Norup
Christina Lykke Munk
Johnny Christensen
Marianne Lillevang
Anders Dam
Niels Erik Jakobsen
Per Skovhus
Peter Schleidt
🙂
Derudover har flere andre medvirket for at skuffe i retsforhold, som ved at lyve Eks. Overfor retten, for at hjælpe Jyske Bank med at bedrage bankens kunder.
Advokater som
Morten Ulrik Gade
Jyske bank
🙂
Philip Baruch
Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen
Lund Elmer Sandager
Som sammen i forening, udsætter bankkunde for dette her, fortsatte bedrageri.
De er alle sammen tilbudt at indlede dialog, hvor vi kan gennemgå beviserne for ledelsens, advokaternes bankens mangeårig bedrageri mod deres kunde
🙂
Del dette med jyske bank, og spørg om banken vil benægte eller indrømme bedrageri / svig
Er det misforstået så ring Andes Dam #Jyskebank #Boxen
Vi undskylder og retter gerne
22227713
mvh
Storbjerg Erhverv
🙂
🙂
Hej Anders Christian Dam
Imens du og Co fortsat nok bare griner af os og siger
Hør en loppe gø.
Hahahaha ja det er da morsomt.
ja grin bare Anders Dam, vi går efter at få forklaret de fremlagte beviser mod Jyske Banks ledelses for groft bedrageri
Men i kan forklare jer i retten, der skal i svare.
Jyske bank bør skamme sig, men det er bestyrelsen som driver butikken efter AKTIONÆRERNES ønsker
Siden maj 2016
Har en samlede Konsernledelse, kunne opklare og stoppe bedrageri.
.
Men det vil Anders Dam ikke
–
Derfor nærmer vi os hovedforhandling i sag og jyskebanks svig mod kunder
–
Svig og bedrageri er det samme
–
–
🙂
Tror vi ved hvorfor vores bevis bilag ikke er blevt fremlagt langt tidligrer til domstolen under sagen.
Det handler jo ikke bare om 100 kr.
1.000 10.000 eller 100.000 kr.
Nej det handler om en stor Dansk Bank og bankens svig for millioner.
–
At dette svig er udført af flere sammen i en forening, og som alle var og stadig er ansat i Danmarks anden største bank, som bestyrelsen nu dækker over.
Så en ret alvorlig og sammen spist sag.
At sagen kan videre føres i strafferetten, som at den Danske banken laver million svindel i mod deres kunde.
Dette kunne godt være grunden.
🙂
–
–
Men Anders Dam du ønskes nu alligevel tillykke
Du og din bestyrelsen er personlige skyld, i denne sag mod jyske bank for million svig om du vil bedrageri & falsk, snart skal hovedfor handles.
🙂
Men det bliver efter Beviserne Anders Dam, ikke kun efter hvad jyske bank ønsker fremlagt.
“Foreløbig Kopi af teksten her.”
Alle bilag der beviser Svig og Falsk indsættes først på denne side.
🙁
🙁
Anders Dam og Co vil have en dom
Jyske bank udnytter gerne at kunde bliver syg.
Efter en hjerneblødning oplyser banken deres kunde at han har lånt 4.328.000 kr i Nykredit
Disse personer er medvirken til at vi skal kæmpe for sandheden
–
Men er bare tale om vildledning og løgn som starter en lavine af spørgsmål til fundamentet i jyske bank.
/
Anders Dam nægter at svare
Koncernledelsen støtter fortsat bedrageri i mod kunden, og har siden maj 2016, nægtet at stoppe bedrageriet selv om ledelsen kunne indrømme og rette op.
Sagen mod jyske bank kun vokser
FIND SVAR PÅ HVOR DE 4.328.000 KR FINDES 🙂
–
RING 89898989 jysk bank
De må vide mere om de penge
–
Anders Dam
Nicolai Hansen
Casper Dam Olsen
Philip Baruch
Birgith Bush Thuesen
Morten Ulrik Gade
Er nogle af dem vi ønsker vidne indkaldt
🙂
Da Jyske Banks øverste ledelse ikke er bange for en retssag, en sag bestyrelsen måske tænkte kun var en storm i et glas vand, og bankens svindel ikke ville blive opdaget og bevist.
Men nu kan sagen vise sig, at blive en ganske pinlig sag, efter som ledelsen har været medvirken til fortsat svig mindst siden maj 2016.
🙁
🙁
Selvom Jyske bank igen sigter efter forældelse
At banken håber deres svig forretninger bliver forældet, startede denne nu ret så alvorlige sag imod banken i allerede tilbage i 2013.
At Jyske Banks svig forretninger først blev opdaget i 2016, er grundet falsk og manipulation af sandheden, samt at jyske bank har bortskaffet eller skjult bevismateriale overfor kunde, advokater og retten.
Mc jyske bank
En anderleds gangster klub
🙂
Beviser som kunde nu selv, ved den underskrevet vidneforklaring Bilag 100 & 101 har fremlagt domstolen, for at sikker sig sagen bliver rigtigt belyst, og for at få en retfærdig rets behandling.
🙁
🙁
En sag bank kunde selv uden hjælp har måtte efterforske og opklare.
Og som kunden ikke kunne få fri proces til, da domstolsstyrelsen ikke mente sagen havde offentlig interesse.
🙂
🙂
🙂
Der er ikke sket forældelse som ved de 1.000 vis af Swap sager og 10.000 vis af hedge invest sager, alle om rådgivning, hvor kunderne fik ret, men jyske bank ikke ville betaling milliard erstatning, grundet forældelse.
Iøvrigt er der i denne jyske bank sag 10 år forældelse ved svig forhold, og her taler vi altså om fortsat svig forbrydelse.
HUSK DU KAN MEGET NEMT BLIVE DEN NÆSTE
🙁
🙁
Jyske bank prøver igen med bankforretninger, der er langt fra redelige bank foretning
Denne sag som vel nok også er værre end bankens hvidvasknings sag, hvor jyske bank fik en millionbøde.
–
Jyske bank sagen er være, da denne sag handler om et årelangt og fortsat svig bedrageri forhold,
Og som nu handler om den Danske befolkning overhoved kan have tillid til de store danske banker.
🙂
–
–
–
Anders Dam læs lige dette fra dronnings nytårstale, den kunne også være skrævet til Dig / jyskebank
🙂
Med betroede positioner følger et særligt ansvar og en særlig pligt til at gøre sit bedste, dér hvor man er sat.
Det gør mig trist, hvis moralen skrider. Hvad bliver der så af almindelig anstændighed? Man skal kende forskel på dit og mit, på rigtigt og forkert. Det burde ikke være så svært.
🙂
–
–
–
Når de Danske banker som her #JyskeBank først laver bedrageri, som vi har påvist det, og bagefter nægter at stoppe bankens bedrageri imod kunderne.
Bliver det er et alvorligt samfundsmæssig problem.
For jyske bank handler det om at snyde og bedrage
.
Dette vil vi fortælle i retten når vi selv afgiver forklaring, med henvisning til mange bilag ved vores vidne forklaring
–
🙂
Når de Danske Banker bedrager deres kunder
Og tilliden til bankene forsvinder helt, har jyske bank en stor del af æren.
🙁
🙁
Det er muligt mange venner af jyske bank gerne vil offer os, og vores retssikkerhed for at Jyske Banks bedrageri og beviserne ikke kommer frem i retten.
Men vi er anderledes end de andre offer for bankernes svindel forretning.
Hvor mange kunder snydes årligt vides ikke, da de nok ikke selv opdager det.
🙁
🙁
Her handler det om at jyske bank står bag 10 års. Kontinuerligt bedrageri imod bank kunde, en lille familie fra Hornbæk,
Og at jyske bank ved koncernledelsen med CEO Anders Dam i spidsen.
Kender alt til bedrageriet men vil ikke erkende, bankens åre lange bedrageri af deres kunder.
Og da slet ikke stoppe Jyske Bank i at bedrage deres kunder.
For så at give en offentlig og uforbeholden undskyldning, dette nægter koncernen.
🙂
Når ja jyske bank benægter jo altid det som banken er bliver taget i.
–
–
Måske jyske bank vil beklage over for bankens #AKTIONÆRE som #ATP
At kunden her mod bankens forventning, alligevel opdagede #jyskebanks svig forbrydelser og fortsætter med at ville stoppe dette svig, selv om det er imod Jyske Banks fundament eller ønsker.
🙂
🙂
Vi vil kæmpe mod Lund Elmer Sandager advokater
Og
Jyske Bank når vi i retten vil forklare at jyske bank laver million svig.
🙂
Prøver at skrive det lidt morsomt så ledelsen rigtigt kan grine af de kunder som banken bedrager
🙂
–
–
Når Danske Banker beviseligt Lyver, retter i og eller manipulere med bilag.
Hvordan ved du så om jyske bank ikke også lyver over for dig.
Det kan du ikke vide, du tager chancen
🙂
Hvilken maske har jyske bank på, når de svare dig.
50 / 50 %
Er den SORT eller er den HVID
Lundin viste også at have 2 sider.
Dette har jyske bank også.
–
Tør du stole på hvad de påstår i jyske bank.
Med 50 % chance på at det er sandt
🙂
🙂
Vi kan bestemt ikke anbefale dig at stoler på jyske bank, da denne bank bevistligt lyver, dette har vi beskrevet og bevist med bare 2 bilag.
–
Sagen her viser hvor langt banker som jyske bank går, når banken bedrager deres kunder, og fortsætte bankens bevidste svig / bedrageri.
–
Dette vil vi igen over for retten under vidne ansvar gentag, som i den allerede underskrevet og frem lagte vidneforklaring overfor retten.
Fremsendt
Til Viborg domstol
BS 1-698/2015 med henvisning til de af os medsendte, og nu fremlagte Bilag 28 – 101.
Med Kopi til pb@les.dk
Philip Baruch Bestyrelsesmedlem og aktionær i jyske bank, samt partner i Lund Elmer Sandager advokater.
–
Du kan læse vidneforklaringen ved brug af link underliggende denne tekst 🙂 altså nederst
🙂
🙂
At det fortsatte SVIG / BEDRAGERI som jyske bank laver og udsætter deres kunder for.
Sker med Koncernledelsens fulde viden og dermed medvirken.
At #AndersDam nægter at svare, men i stedet lader bedrageriet fortsætte, styrker ikke tilliden til den anden største Danske Bank Jyske Bank.
🙂
🙂
Og når samfundets top advokater som.
Lund Elmer Sandager advokater hjælper jyske bank, med at dækker over bedrageri, som ved at lyve processuelt over for retten.
Tilbage holder, ændre eller bortskaffe bevis materiale for at ville skuffe i retsforhold.
Så er og bliver det til et samfundsmæssig problen.
🙂
🙂
Når banker som jyske bank bedrager
Bliver det også et problem for tilliden til de danske bankerne i øvrigt.
Måske derfor har ingen af vores advokater, ønsket at fremlægge beviserne imod jyske bank for bedrageri, imens jyske bank blot fortsætter bankens bedrageri.
Men nu er vores beviser altså blevet fremlagt overfor retten, sammen med vores vidne forklaring.
🙂
De fremlagt beviser overfor retten, er de bilag vi finder vigtige, for at bevise at jyske bank laver bedrageri / SVIG,
Ja for svig
Hvilket altså er BEDRAGERI.
Dette er retten oplyst 03-01-2018 ved fremlæggelse af bilag, og brev til jyske bank 28-12-2017
Brevet gen fremlægges som Bilag 72. i vores vidne forklaring 28-12-2018
–
Når retten 13-11-2018 beder vores advokat bekræfte at retten kan se bort fra dette bilag 72. Og bilag
Skrev vi straks at dette fremsendte fastholdes til vores forklaring var fremlagt.
🙂
Bilagende fremlægges for at understøtter vores underskrevet vidneforklaring af 28-12-2018
Del 1 og del 2. Som nu er fremlagt overfor retten.
Og kopi sendt til Jyske Banks Advokat og Bestyrelsesmedlem Philip Baruch.
Bilagende er fordelt på 6 mails, grundet de mange beviser på overtrædelser af love og regler.
🙂
🙂
Denne underskrevet vidneforklaring er lavet, for at sikker vores sag bliver fremlagt og vi sikres en retfærdig retssag, altså at sagen fremlægges som vi har anmodet, og fremlagt den siden 2016.
Sagen er muligvis af offentlig interesse, da det handler om hvor kriminelle nogle Danske banker kan være
Og hvor svært det er at stoppe de uhæderlige banker som jyske bank med at lave bedrageri.
Når først bankerne laver bedrageri, som vi her beviser at jyske bank gør det, må vi råbe op og få sagen fremlagt for retten.
Dette har vi nu gjort 28-12-2018
–
Hvis domstolen nægter os at fremlægge disse beviser.
Må vi til Domstolsstyrelsen, og nægter de at beviser mod Danske Banker for bedrageri fremlægges
Må vi til EU domstolen,
tankerne her er grundet jyske bank konstant har modarbejdet opklaring
Sagen rækker meget højt.
Men når Danske Banker som jyske bank bevidst bedrager deres kunder, skal det stoppes.
🙂
🙂
Når intet af vores kladde til et processkrift, på de 40 sider fra 10 dec. med vores bilag er blevet fremlagt retten 18 dec.
Og når vi føler dette er vigtigt for at belyse sagen, er vores vidneforklaring og bilag vigtige at få fremlagt for retten inden sagens hovedforhandling starter.
🙂
🙂
Vi ønsker sagen fremlagt og forklaret under hovedforhandling, derfor skal det fremlægges inden
At det lige sker 28-12-2018
er grundet koncernledelsen i jyske bank netop vælger at fortsætter bankens bedrageri i mod os samme dag.
🙂
🙂
Vi har anmodet at sagen blev fremlagt, som vi har forklaret den,
Dette var måske ikke nødvendigt såfremt CEO Anders Dam gav indrømmelser og undskyldte bankens vedvarende udnyttelse og Svig imod virksomhed.
Men nu turde vi ikke vente længer, og derfor har vi selv sørget for at vores sag blev fremlagt med vidneforklaring.
Og det er sket inden hovedforhandling er startet.
🙂
🙂
Vores fuldmægtige i sagen, ringede 17.45 samme dag som det afsluttende svarskrift skulle afleveres
Oplyste det ikke var nødvendig at fremlægge nogle af vores bilag, som dem vi fra start har ønsket fremlagt, dog får vi fremlagt bilag 29. bilag 30.
–
Som er et
Bilag 29. mail fra Nykredit om at vores godkendte rentesikring fra 15-07-2008 Bilag E.5. er blevet lukket.
Bilag 30. mail fra Nicolai Hansen at vi har lånt 4.328.000 kr. I Nykredit og rente bytter dette med jyske bank.
🙂
Siger også at det er nogle grove beskyldninger vi har imod jyske bank
Ja dette er ganske rigtigt nogle grove beskyldninger
Og er jo også derfor vores beviser skal fremlægges, for at understøtte disse beskyldninger, således de ikke står alene.
🙂
🙂
Tænker om Stein Bagger også tænkte bedrageri anklagerne imod ham var nogle grove beskyldninger.
DET HANDLER OM BEVISER
Og disse er fremlagt i vore vidne forklaring.
🙂
🙂
Vi blev oplyses at det ikke var nødvendig at fremlægge nogle af vores bilag
Da vi jo ikke har lånt 4.328.000 kr. i Nykredit tilbage i 2008
hvilket jyske bank jo har indrømmet 5. November 2018.
Altså 10 år efter.
Og derfor har vi heller ikke nogle rente bytte.
–
Dette ved vi, og har også sagt og skrevet til Anders Dam, som er ligeglad.
Men retten skulle have vores vidneforklaring med beviserne fremlagt for at få
jyske bank dømt for at lave bedrageri / svig
🙂
🙂
Hertil oplyser vi
At jyske bank jo stadig 18. Dec. fastholder deres rentesikring
Bilag 1. fra 16-07-2008 til afdækning af renterisikoen på et UNDERLIGGENDE lån.
Men at de nu bare siger det er til et låne tilbud fra 06-05-2009. Altså er et overliggende lån.
Med henvisning til at fremlægge bilag, oplyses vi godt kan fremlægge flere bilag senere.
–
Vores vidne udsagn og bilag er derfor af afgørende vigtighed, at få fremlagt retten
Eftersom jyske bank 05-11-2018 har fastholdt Bilag 1.
Og dermed benægter alle vores påstande om SVIG.
–
–
Jyske Bank har gentagende ændret deres forklaring over for retten, når jyske bank er blevet grebet i at skrive usandt.
🙁
Og når vores sag ikke er blevet fremlagt, som vi har forklaret og anmodet den den fremlagt, siden vi opdagede jyske bank muligvis nok lavede Groft SVIG tilbage i april. 2016.
🙂
🙂
Efter vi igen 28-12-2018
Konstaterer at jyske bank med koncernledens 13 medlemmer bag.
Og Anders Dam i spidsen
Fortsætter med at udsætte kunde i jyske bank for helt bevidst Svig.
Ved igen at snupe 78.000 kr.
Kalder det renter ved en rentesikring af et underliggende lån.
🙁
Et underliggende lån der ikke findes, Bilag 28. men som jyske bank beviseligt har løjet optaget Bilag 30.
Et lån der ikke er aftalt rente byttet, men som jyske bank har manipuleret, senest 11-02-2016 bare var et ombyttet bilag E.5 med Bilag 1. velvidende at bilaget E.5 er lukket ved Bilag 29.
Men som jyske bank nu 5. Nov. 2018 kalder, for et overliggende lån, som jyske bank har tvangs nedbragt, men benægter dog også dette over for retten i sagen.
Dette er en af grundene til at vi 28-12-2018 har skrevet vores vidme forklaring.
Og herefter fremsendt og fremlagt denne overfor retten, samt medsendte bilagene 28-101 litterat rigtigt, da de alle er omtalt i vidne forklaring
🙂
🙂
Vi har i vidne forklaring, som i de mange breve til koncernen
Opfordret jyske bank til at bevise vi har aftalt en ny rentesikring 16-07-2008
Hvis tilbudet Bilag Y. Fra 20-05-2008 blev hjemtaget
Altså hjemtaget er at gøre brug af et tilbud.
Et tilbud på 4.328.000 kr. der udløb 20-11-2008, og fuldmagten for dette tilbud udløb samtids 20-11-2008
🙂
Dette er vores afsluttende bemærkning
Storbjerg fastholder og har oplyst retten.
At svig forholdet, er sket og fortsat imens kunde var syg efter bla. en Hjerneblødning.
Hertil er fremlagt Bilag 93 til 97.
Carsten har mindst været syg 2009-2014.
Hvilket kun har gjort det nemmere for jyske bank at lave bedrageri i mod deres kunde.
Gratis reklame er bedre end ingen reklame
Simon Spis
🙂
🙂
Bilag 100.
At jyske bank har manipuleret med bilagene som at tildele flere virksomheder samme konto, samtidens og overlappende.
🙂
Bilag 101.
At jyske bank kontinuerligt har udsat familien og virksomheden for løbende SVIG.
Og udnyttelse dette er sket ved misbrug af bilag, tilbageholdelse af oplysninger, og at jyske bank har været uærlige over for Domstolen
🙂
Velkommen til jyske bank
En anderledes bank
–
Vi ønsker at jyske bank dømmes for svig,
og at Bilag 1. Er Falsk eller ugyldig.
Sagen kan nu hoved forhandles.
–
Det handler om beviser, hvilket jyske bank Havkatten skrev før de blokerede os, da banken er ligeglad med deres kunder.
Dengang var vores beviser ikke fremlagt retten.
Men der er de nu.
Og har mere hvis der er nødvendigt.
Og nu må retten gå sin gang.
–
–
De Bilag 19-113 & vores 40 siders kladde til processkrift der blev afleveret til 10 dec.
Så det kunne fremlægges, bruger vi nu delvist i vores vidneforklaring, nogle bilag er taget ud, og bilags nr. er ændret.
Lær jyskebank at kende
–
–
Har koncernen Jyske Bank nogle spørgsmål eller rettelser
Eller har Anders Dam og Co
Bestyrelsen
noget i ikke mener er sandt
Så SMS og vi får det rettet.
🙂
SMS 22227713
Mvh familien Skaarup
🙂
Bilag 100 og 101.
Vidne forklaring underskrevet, læs den her.
Indsat side 1 af 2. Bilag 100.
Af vidne forklaring, del 1 af 2.
Vidneforklaring side 1 af 2. Linker til bilag 100 & 101
–
Forklaring
Til Anders Dam om hans medvirken til at jyske bank bedrager deres kunder.
Indsat ved side 2 af 2. Bilag 100.
Af vidne forklaring, del 1 af 2.
Vidneforklaring side 2 af 2.
Del 1. af 2. Linker til forklaring.
🙂
Bilag som er nævnt i vidneforklaring. 1. – 102.
(Link kommer)
🙂
Bilag som er nævnt i vidneforklaring.
A. –
(Link kommer)
🙂
🙂
En offentlig sag
Som er delt siden 2016.
Både på biler og på internettet som
www.banknyt.dk
Jyske Banks bestyrelse har ingen kommentar til kundes opråb på dialog.
🙂
Derfor findes løsningen ved doms forhandling.
Jyske bank vil frifindes og fastholde Bilag 1.
Storbjerg erhverv vil have Bilag 1. Ugyldig og have jyske bank samt ledelsen dømt for grov udnyttelse og svig.
🙂
🙂
Læs her hvorfor, forklaring del 1 & 2 samt Bilagsliste.
Klik på billed og læs hvad vi underskriver, alt rettes og indsættes i bedre kopier.
Bilag 100.
Vidne forklaring side 1 af 2.
Bilag 100.
Vidne forklaring side 2 af 2.
Del 1. af 2.
Bilag 98 side 1. af 2.
Bilags listen til bilag 100.
Bilag 98. Side 2. af side 2.
Til underskrevet vidne forklaring del 1 & 2.
mod jyske bank
Bilag 101. Side 1 af 6.
Vidneforklaring del 2.
Bilag 101. Side 2 af 6.
Vidneforklaring del 2 mod jyskebank for svig
Bilag 101. Side 3 af 6
Vidneforklaring del 2
Bilag 101. Side 4 af 5.
Vidneforklaring del 2
Mod jyske bank for svig og falsk
Bilag 101. Side 5 af 6.
Vidne forklaring del 2
Imod jyske bank for svig
Bilag 101. Side 6 af 6.
Underskrævet vidneforklaring del 2.
imod jyske bank for svig.