Page is under updating latest 05-04-2020.
A page about bribery in Denmark and the Danish banks’ criminality against their customers.
It is not unknown to the senior members of Jyske Bank A/S
That there are customers in Jyske bank A/S who are exposed to proven fraud.
THE MESSAGE IS STILL ONLY TO GET INTO DIALOGUE
Regardless, Jyske Bank claims to comply with all laws and regulations.
However, we do not agree with the group.
No matter what mighty friends will know to cover that Jyske Bank exposes us to continued fraud.
Det kunne være så nemt men jyske bank vil gøre alt hvad jysk bank kan for ikke at skulle betale erstatning for 9 års svindel af bank kunde i jyske bank
Jyske Bank skriver tydligt
at jyske bank ikke bedrager
at jyske bank ikke stjæler
at jyske bank altid overholder
de til enhver gældende regler og love
And you can laugh at the stupid customers in Jyske Bank A/S
who do not understand why the group does not customers for words such as customer service, honesty, trustworthy, reasonable.
It is not unknown to the senior members of Jyske Bank A/S that there are customers who are exposed to proven fraud.
And this is supported by the entire group together.
Still, all members are struggling to run fair banking, by not admitting that the group is doing fraud and fake.
The customer says that all the group management team members know that.
–
That Jyske Bank’s overall Board of Directors knows this.
–
To Jyske Bank’s legal department as at Morten Ulrik Gade, Peter Stig Hansen.
–
That Jyske Bank’s Chairman of the Order CEO Anders Christian Dam knows.
–
Call +4522227713 if there is one or a few misunderstandings so we can correct this.
The last thing we want is a lawsuit, which we wrote a long time before, we discovered that Jyske Bank A/S doing fraud, read 28-10-2019.
–
Lundgrens law firm is at risk to legal certainty in Denmark.
Therefore, former client, complaining about Lundgren’s attorneys, for appearing sordid and by no LOYALT to their client, surely after the Defendant initiated their million co-operation, with Plaintiff’s attorney Lundgren’s attorneys.
–
Read text messages to Lundgrens and note that Lundgrens does not confirm their client, why
Partner Dan Terkildsen writes it is conspiracy theories.
You can see text on facebook shared images here and feel free to write and share.
When Lundgrens sends bills for almost 200,000 dkk. for failing to submit any of the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank’s group for forgery. “document false” and among other things like fraud.
And at the same time, having removed some of the client’s transferred money from the client account.
That indicates Lundgren’s attorneys have wanted to help Jyske Bank’s board to ruin the client.
While Jyske Bank A/S at the same time continues the bank’s fraud, with a view to undermining the client’s finances, and that the client can not afford a new lawyer, to put an end to Jyske Bank’s continued fraud crimes against the bank’s own customers.
🙁
Perhaps Denmark’s biggest fraud case, where a large Danish bank is deceiving their client.
And getting help from the client’s lawyer, the client says it’s like being in a bad movie.
Part of the Client’s transferred money to Lundgrens disappeared.
But who has kept them.
The client’s money which disappeared from Lundgren’s bookkeeping.
–
We only yesterday made a small check on Lundgren’s limb way of bookkeeping. And finds that Lundgrens also has no control over their debtor bookkeeping.
If in Denmark you are exposed to what looks like organized crime, how large Danish banks are involved.
And you are asking the police, as well as the Danish authorities to help you.
Then you will find that you are very alone.
No one will help you.
Nykredit og mange årige partner Jyske bank med flere kendte sager som deres Swap sager hvor både Nykredit og jyske bank løb om kap for at sælge højrisiko lån som de bedste og Som i sådeles hed blev oplyst som HELT sikkert uden risiko
You might explain why Nykredit, we first had to sue Nykredit, before Nykredit’s lawyer Mette Egholm Nielsen 18-10-2016 would answer the question, if we in Nykredit have taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000
And when we should “Appendix D.” have rescheduled this loan, which Jyske Bank has informed their customer “Appendix 29.”
The answer from Nykredit was that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit. “Appendix 30. Case”
So it is simple Jyske Bank is lying and that of doing Jyske Bank Fraud.
This seemed to be Jyske Bank’s collaborative partner from Lundgrens, not to be included in their case against Jyske Bank, which Lundgrens managed bypassing their client’s otherwise very clear instructions
Når Nykredit Michael Rasmussen holder møde med Jyske Bank Anders Dam er det sikkert hemmeligt hvad der aftales. det handler om mange penge.
And you’re the little against apparently politically system.
Where the elite cover the elite so that they can remain in power.
In our case they seemed to use all tricks, and as in our case now also seemed to have bribes thriving quite well.
And the only thing we have tried is to get a meeting with Jyske Bank’s top management, to get some help here.
In the time the case has been in the City Court started in 2015.
We have only now, got a reputable lawyer who will help us, and present our case.
As we have since April 2016. After we discovered that Jyske Bank was probably a criminal and subjected to a huge fraud, our lawyer asked to file the case and to present our fraud allegations.
🙂
The case is now also about Lundgren’s Attorneys have been corrupt since they have not submitted any of our allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for False and Fraud, see more on the blog.
🙂
Follow our blog.
🙂
Now, we just want Jyske Bank Group management to admit that the bank is exposing us to fraud.
Read at danish.
Læs opslag på engelsk.
It shouldn’t be that hard to understand.
Can the Board of Directors of Jyske Bank’s organization, new and outgoing in the Jyske Bank A/S Group.
Say that they have no responsibility for exposing the customer to fraud crimes, when the client repeatedly asked the entire Board not to. read letters to the board member.
🙁
And can we trust Lundgrens Attorneys.
When partner Dan Terkildsen on August 13, 2019 told that Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has no responsibility, when Lundgrens has now clearly incurred a major conflict of interest, since the millions must have trundled into Lungren’s account from Jyske Bank A/S
Here at the top is the Chairman of Jyske Bank A/S
CEO Anders Christian Dam, and below we have the next chairman of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors Kurt Bligaard Pedersen.
Jyske bank er da ikke kriminelle vel ?
JO JYSKE BANK KONCERNEN
ER DYBT KRIMINELLE
Men spørg dem selv, og del svaret, brug linket klik på Anders Dam leder af den kriminelle bank.
–
Ding Dong er der nogle hjemme i #jysk #bank
Vores største ønske er jo bare at Jyske Banks direktion / ledelse
Senest 19 februar 2019.
Tager sit ansvar og tager stilling til
A.
Anders Dam
INDRØMMER OG UNDSKYLDER
1. Stopper med at lave bedrageri
2. Indrømmer udnyttelse
3. Indrømmer bedrageri
4. Indrømmer fuldmagts misbrug
5. Indrømmer dokument falsk
6. Undskylder for groft bedrageri
7. Anders Dam fyres / fratræder
8. Bestyrelsen fratræder / afsættes og udskiftes
SKRIV DET FØRST PÅ JERES HJEMMESIDE.
Så dropper vi jo skriveriet.
Eller
🙂
B.
Koncern ledelsen benægter alt
Og skriver på deres velkommen i jyske bank, at jyske bank kun vil, stoppe bedrageri, hvis banken dømmes for svig & falsk mod deres kunder, som mod virksomheden her.
SÅ VI SNART FÅR DEN DOM
🙂
C.
Alle andre muligheder syntes at være udtømte.
Derfor skal sagen hurtigst muligt fremlægges dommeren til hovedforhandling.
Så kan vi få den dom koncernen, så gerne vil have, men som bangebuksen Anders Dam, ikke tør skrive.
–
19-02-2019
Dette er sidste dato, hvor vi ønsker at modtage en uforbeholden undskyldning.
Altså ikke en beklagelse, den kan Anders Dam og Co. tørrer deres RØV i.
🙂
🙂
Medvirken til Jyske Banks fortsatte bedrageri er
Bestyrelsen ved :
Sven Buhrækall
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen
Rina Asmussen
Philip Baruch
Jens Borup
Keld Norup
Christina Lykke Munk
Johnny Christensen
Marianne Lillevang
Anders Dam
Niels Erik Jakobsen
Per Skovhus
Peter Schleidt
🙂
Derudover har flere andre medvirket for at skuffe i retsforhold, ved at lyve Eks. Over for retten, for at hjælpe Jyske Bank med at bedrage kunder.
Advokater som
Morten Ulrik Gade
Jyske bank
🙂
Philip Baruch
Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen
Lund Elmer Sandager
Som sammen i forening, udsætter bankkunde for dette her fortsatte bedrageri.
De er alle sammen tilbudt at indlede dialog, hvor vi kan gennemgå beviserne for ledelsens, advokaternes, bankens mange årig bedrageri mod deres kunde
🙂
Del dette med jyske bank, og spørg om banken vil benægte bedrageri / svig
Er det misforstået så ring Andes Dam #Jyskebank #Boxen
Vi undskylder og retter gerne
22227713
mvh
Storbjerg Erhverv
Næstformand Kurt Bligaard Pedersen står til at overtage formandsposten i Jyske Bank efter Sven Buhrkals exit. Dermed får banken en formand, som også har siddet centralt placeret i det politiske system.
2 very powerful people, in the Danish industry.
None of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors have wanted any form of dialogue, or have Jyske Bank stop deceiving us.
Can Danish Banks as Jyskebank be trusted ? Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors are all offered to be able to release themselves for wider responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud, but no one on the Board has wanted to stop Jyske Bank from exposing the customer to fraud, therefore the Board is now involved as contributing
Here a LINK to Wilcome the same page. But in Danish NOT READY.
The first time Jyske Bank car was flicked was in November 2016.
–
Image was sent to Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade 9, which ironically was behind the fake swap.
–
The comment was that they were fixing the problem
–
The site has grown to include Bribery, or what CEO Ander Christian Dam would call it.
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
While we fix the bank news.
If we move the many sub-pages to the block, this is done to tell you more about the many different criminal conditions, where the Jyske Bank Group very clearly violates the Criminal Code, and thus is to be described as criminal.
And individually we will review and explain on the pages, each one of Jyske Bank’s many violations of the penal code provisions, and document them with 1st conditions on each page.
As well as making a page. With our total allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, and insert the said attachments, where they are mentioned in the closing reply letter from 28-10-2019.
The customer accuses Jyske Bank’s group management, in association, to stand behind, the bank’s continued fraud against Jyske Bank’s own customer.
This will be the case with the Danish authorities, which the police do not control, which is why Danish bank customers, in fact, stand alone against the largest and most powerful, apparently criminal organizations in Denmark.
There will also be audio clips shared with the client’s former attorneys, so you can hear both.
Law firm Rödstenen. Dalgas Ave 42, 8000 Aarhus +4586121999
And
Lundgrens Advokat partner company. Tuborg Boulevard 12. DK-2900 Hellerup +4535252535
In the shared recorded conversations, you will hear both Lundgrens and Rödstenen employees, even very clearly, and may be clearly informed by telephone.
Partly the client’s many repetitive allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, but not least emphasizes the seriousness of the case, where the client repeatedly, says that it is a fraud and false case.
The Jyske Bank Group has on several occasions been offered to admit fraud against the bank’s customers, which the management refuses, while the large Danish bank Jyske Bank by the Group management, continues the serious fraud and exploitation, the case fraud allegations are presented to the court.
Which most recently Lundgren’s staff, attorney Emil Hald Winstrøm in all telephone conversations has been disclosed.
Emil Hald Winstrøm confirms by telephone, that he has understood. that this is a fraud case.
Nevertheless, on behalf of partner Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren’s attorneys on September 2, 2019, Emil Hald Winstrøm presents the case to the court, without including any of the client’s claims.
🙂
And without sharing Lundgren’s claim document with the client.
Although Lundgren’s lawyer, and partner Dan Terkildsen is subsequently sued for a copy of their own claim document from 2 September 2019.
(Since it has nothing to do with the client’s claims.)
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen choose again not to share court documents, with their client.
We will continually, share a lot where we can clearly prove, that several Lundgren’s attorneys must have planned, not to submit their client’s claims.
05-02-2018 på vej til Lundgrens
The client has really been without a lawyer since February 5, 2018
When Lundgrens was hired, and up to Lundgrens 25. September 2019 was fired.
24-09-2019.
Lundgren’s lawyers, 19 September 2019 were asked to answer a simple question:
Lundgrens works for Jyske bank A / S.
–
Lundgrens does not answer their client.
–
Lundgrens also decided that they would not share the allegation document 2 made by Lundgrens and presented the court on September 2, 2019.
–
Lundgrens, due to suspicion of carrying, has been bribed. then fired September 25, 2019.
–
Then the client himself 28-10-2019. had to present their claims against Jyske Bank A/S to the court.
24-09-2019. page 6-6
Lundgren’s lawyers, 19 September 2019 were asked to answer a simple question:
Lundgrens works for Jyske bank A / S.
–
Lundgrens does not answer their client.
–
Lundgrens also decided that they would not share the allegation document 2 made by Lundgrens and presented the court on September 2, 2019.
–
Lundgrens, due to suspicion of carrying, has been bribed. then fired September 25, 2019.
–
Then the client himself 28-10-2019. had to present their claims against Jyske Bank A/S to the court.
This case clearly shows how some of Denmark’s biggest lawyers, by their actions, are a serious threat to legal certainty.
The case here is a terrible example of how Danish lawyers, like here the plaintiffs’ lawyers Lundgrens have really, counteracted their client.
At the same time that Plaintiff’s Attorneys really worked for Defendants in the case, removing Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants.
As here in the case where plaintiff’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S were not presented to the court.
Plaintiff’s attorney here Lundgrens, in this way, has shown that the law firm, in fact, has work to disappoint in legal matters, by going directly against the client’s instructions.
As Lundgrens Advokater chooses not only to work against their client, but also chose to pursue another case against Jyske Bank A/S.
Lundgren’s attorneys at Dan Terkildsen will receive this first folder of evidence on 5 February 2018 for Jutland Bank to carry out Mandate Fraud, Fraud, Document Fake, Proxy Abuse, Exploitation OSV.
Than the case against Jyske Bank for fraud as the client February 5, 2018, transferred to Lundgren’s lawyers.
Lundgren’s Attorneys have harmed the confidence of the Danish lawyers, by unethical, dishonesty and possibly by violations of the law, made every effort to prevent their client’s claims from being brought to court.
Poor lawyer advice in LUNDGRENS.
Lundgren’s attorneys at Dan Terkildsen receive a folder of evidence on 5 February 2018 for Jutland Bank to carry out Mandate Fraud, Fraud, Document Fake, Proxy Abuse, Exploitation OSV.
Lundgrens is requested to proceed with the case and to present the Client’s claims to the court.
Can clients in the large law firms soon rely on the lawyers they employ if Jyske Bank A/S may pay Lundgrens, or otherwise have caused Lundgrens to do the exact opposite of what their client has 100 times said and written to be presented.
What do we have to do with great Danish lawyers like Lundgren’s Lawyers.
The case here is about the big Danish lawyer’s houses really to be trusted.
We can prove that several of those employed in Lundgrens, have proven to work against the client, rather than working for the client.
One thing here is that the client wants Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank A/S, to stop the bank’s fraud against the customer.
This they asked Lundgrens to help them with, instead Lundgrens is employed by Jyske Bank, and what happened then ?.
The client believes that the Jyske Bank groups have paid Lundgrens for not submitting their client claims to the court.
This is a serious problem for all Danes
And if the same lawyers as here Lundgrens, has clients in the US., ENGLAND, RUSSIA, CHINA, JAPAN, GERMANY Can these clients also get into the same problems as us?
When Danish clients obviously can’t trust big Danish lawyer houses like Lundgrens.
Then Lundgrens becomes a major threat to legal certainty.
If you cannot trust the lawyer you hire will be loyal to you, as their client, this is a grave problem.
Lundgrens chose not to answer their client, or to share court documents with the client, which does not look good.
Scam case. Have Lundgren’s lawyers for an unknown million, taken work for Jyske Bank in the period after February 5, 2018. How small a bank a former employee of Lundgren’s lawyers, by partner Dan Terkildsen, who directly contradicts the client’s instructions, and in saddness with good lawyer custom, chooses to withhold the client’s claims about Jyske Bank’s Fraud cases before the court.
Scam case. Have Lundgren’s lawyers for an unknown amount of money, taken work for Jyske Bank in the period after February 5, 2018. How small bank did former employees of Lundgren’s lawyers, by partner Dan Terkildsen, who directly contradicted the client’s instructions, and in saddlery against good lawyer custom , chooses to withhold client’s claims about Jyske Bank’s Fraud Offenses before the court.
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Kongens Lyngby. Denmark
–
Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
Here you can on 2 annexes, 1 and 2 September 2019.
By self-examination you find that Lundgren’s lawyers, completely consciously and in bad faith, directly against the client’s instructions, do the exact opposite of what the client repeated since February 2018. Lundgrens has to present in the district court.
Her kan du på 2 bilag, den 1 og 2. September 2019.
Ved selvsyn konstatere at Lundgrens advokater, helt bevidst og i ond tro, direkte imod kundens instrukser, gør det absolutte modsatte af, det klienten gentagne siden februar 2018. har sagt Lundgrens skal fremlægge i byretten.
Read about Danske Bank’s million fraud against a customer, here carried out by Jyske Bank A/S and well assisted by the bank’s board and Lund Elmer Sandager. Lundgren’s lawyers who chose instead to counter the client’s claims against Jyske Bank was not presented, the customer Therefore has had to submit their claims themselves for the court.
It’s pretty funny. Here you only get 2 dates that show that Lundgrens is a rotten lawyer Corporation
January 8 and 9, 2019 September 1 and 2, 2019.
Lundgrens does not share the court’s information Lundgrens does not write the client’s witnesses on litigation 2.
Nor does Lundgrens share the litigation with the client
Appendices and letters are inserted in a timeline, and a page is created for those who have helped not stop Jyske Bank’s fraud
We move the list below pages into the blog so that the page gets cluttered
Donation to lawyer assistance against Jyske bank A/S for gross fraud
carried out and continued by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors since May 2016
in association. received
IBAN DK0854790004563376.
Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.
It is a great thing for legal certainty in Denmark that a Danish bank is allowed by the police to commit crime. Or does the new chief of police or the Minister of Justice have a good explanation, no politicians or authorities will help stop Jyske Bank’s fraud charges against us customers.
ER LUNDGRENS KORUPTE
This means that everyone must comply with the law. – And no one should undermine the state, by entering into agreements not to be investigated for fraud, whether it is against payment or otherwise. – This of course also applies to Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgren’s lawyers i Denmark.
Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt and is the Danske Bank Jyske bank fraudulent.
Read with and judge if these are Conspiracy theories as Partner Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren’s lawyer partner company claims.
Please read some of the many letters we have sent to Lundgrens, the court and Rørdtenen attorneys since 2016, to present our claims against JYSKE BANK FOR FRAUD AND FALSE.
And read what Lundgrens presents, it is not where we have given Lundgren’s instructions to submit.
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
If you have any questions then call +4522227713
best regards The Skaarup family from Hornbaek
Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbark
DK. Denmark.
Hovedforhandling i stor svindel sag mod jyske bank
30. September &
1. Oktober being exposed when the corrupted lawyer, did not try to present the client’s allegations against the defendant.
Main hearing in large fraud case against Jyske Bank 30th of September & October 1 is listed after apparent problems with a corrupt lawyer
Who only 30 daysand 2 hours, before the main hearing, the court submits the client’s evidence of fraud, and to file client claims.
Or to share the case with the client, need to see a few letters to Lundgren’s lawyers, then you will understand that they are probably corrupt
A fraud case that ends up being about bribery in some of Denmark’s largest law firms and Danish banks.
If CEO Ander Christian Dam has another explanation, our number is +4522227713
And wants Jyske Bank’s group management to admit that we are exposed to fraud, and the Board has been aware of this fraud and false at least since May 2016.
When Jyske bank on their facebook page writes, among other things, you can be sure a judge will probably look at the evidence. – While the group management has obviously paid the client’s lawyer, with a return commission, not to present the client’s claims and evidence, then it is difficult for a judge to see what the client’s allegations and -evidence are about. – Who covers Jyske Bank’s ongoing fraud?
Jyske Bank blocks the customer on Facesbook, twitter and wherever they can, to avoid possible questions about the bank’s fraud. – While the management does not want to stop fraud. – And since Jyske Bank’s group has bought the client’s lawyer. – Have Jyske bank has all the aces on hand, for the customer does not really have a lawyer for 43 months. – But is alone against the giant Jyske Bank A/S and there are many lawyers who are also Lundgrens. – Who have pretended to be the client’s lawyer, since February 2018,. – While Lundgrens was actually evil, and work to prevent the client’s case from being presented in court, which was in Jyske Bank’s financial interest.
Now, we just want Jyske Bank Group management to admit that the bank is exposing us to fraud.
And then stop deceiving us.
The fact that Jyske Bank has paid our earlier, lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers to withhold our claims against Jyske Bank A/S to disappoint in legal matters, is disgusting banking business.
If Lundgrens does not believe they have countered the client’s allegations in being presented to the court.
Or if Lundgrens has not worked for Jyske Bank A/S.
Then we receive your “Lundgrens” explanation on phone +4522227713.
Since the Danish police will not investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, we also do not think the police will investigate whether Jyske Bank A/S has paid Lundgrens bribery, hidden as a return commission, for not submitting our allegations against Jyske Bank for Bedrageri. “FRAUD”
*
Remember that Lundgren’s lawyers must be corrupt
Since what we write and ask Lundgren to present here September 1, 2019.
And like Lundgrens, the day after September 2, 2019, is Lundgrens presented a chase as is 100% against the client’s instructions
*
Note the email of September 1 at. 11.44
And just below read what Lundgrens presents without sharing with the client, and without the client’s approval, September 2.
And then read Lundgren’s partner writes on September 5 that we do not agree.
Hope that Jyske bank has paid many millions to Lundgrens to disappoint in legal matters, and Lundgren’s lawyer is paying our fees back, although Dan Terkildsen thought Lundgrens has done a great job for us.
01-09-2019 Remember this is only one of maybe 100 letters and mails to Lundgrens where we ask them to present our case against Jysk Bank A/S Silkeborg Denmark
–
Lundgren’s attorneys must be visually impaired and more word blind than their client.
Or even if Jyske Bank A/S paid Lundgrens many millions dkk, hidden as return commission, to help cover Jyske Bank’s A/S fraud and false, against the bank’s customer, and disappoint in residual conditions.
–
02-09-2019 1/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 2/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 3/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 4/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 5/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
5479 – 4563376 Nykredit
IBAN DK0854790004563376
Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.
Rådden advokat rådgivning i LUNDGRENS.
–
When you have just read what we wrote to Lundgren’s lawyers on September 1. 2019
And what Lundgren’s submission to the court on September 2. 2019
Without wanting to send the client a copy, which we otherwise asked Partner Dan Terkildsen to send a copy of.
And then ask yourself, if there is a reason we since may 2016, have tried to enter into dialogue, with Jyske Bank Group CEO Anders Christian Dam
To clarify whether, this was simply a mistake, that the group in 2016 could immediately rectify.
Or if there is nothing wrong with Jyske Bank A/S Organization
Can Danish Banks as Jyskebank be trusted ?
If a company makes a mistake.
Then the most stupid thing is to lie to the court.
And stupid to submit a manipulated document to disappoint in legal matters.
And then it is also stupid to bribe the client’s lawyer not to submit the client’s claims in court.
Is what the customer here is up to.
–
The customer’s new lawyer phoned shortly before Christmas 2019 and said that Jyske Bank A/S did not want a dialogue.
and by the way, did not respond to our closing remarks of 28-10-2019.
We are only waiting for our new lawyer, to put on his boxing gloves as we are up against Denmark’s next largest bank Jyske Bank, as is lying and misleading where the bank can.
–
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
See the letters, mails and sms sent to, among others, Lundgren’s lawyers.
Where the client very clearly asks their lawyers, to present their customer’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S, and what witnesses to call.
We make it easy for you to look by letters, and emails during the period 11 August 2019 and until 1 September 2019.
And compare what we write to Lundgren’s attorneys, and what Lundgren’s attorneys present on September 2, 2019 in Petition 2.
And when and read it, as Lundgrens presents to the court partner by Dan Terkildsen in Lundgren
Dan Terkildsen writes on September 5, 2019. : There is a need to discuss the stradigy, as we obviously do not agree.
Now we getting pretty angry.
The Danish police would not investigate the Jyske Bank A/S Group for fraud and document false.
The police and the state attorney refuse to interrogate the notifier, or investigate the fraud, by writing Jyske bank will not be convicted.
Where the customer is told that they can present their case to the cevil court themselves, the damn thing is that we are trying.
–
Can Danish Banks as Jyske bank be trusted ? NO
But that large Danish lawyers companies such as Lundgrens are corrupt, and obviously have been bribed by Jyske Bank A/S
For not having to present their client’s case in court.
This is a threat to the Danish legal system.
The police know we are fraudulent and refuse to interfere.
During the period May June 2019, the Danish Parliament was informed of Jyske Bank’s fraud and document falsification
And has been provided with documentation, no one has answered.
🙂
The FSA “Finance oversight” has been asked to look into the case, but has refused to investigate the case, as it is a civil trial.
But when the costumers Danish lawyer Lundgrens seemed to be corrupt.
And the lawyers, do not want to present the clients case to the court, and instead try to manipulate the client, to disappoint in legal matters.
Can Danish Banks as Jyske bank be trusted ?
How can customers in the Danish banks then stop the banks’ ongoing fraud against them.
That Lundgrens does not even think they are corrupt, and Lund Elmer Sandager’s lawyers, on behalf of Jyske Bank A/S, write that they strongly distance themselves from allegations of bribery.
In view of the fact that Lundgrens, had already been employed by Jyske bank A/S
Only a few months after the grove was hired to file a case against Jyske Bank for gross fraud
🙂
And subsequently against the client’s instructions, did not submit a single statement of the customer’s claims against Jyske Bank’s group and management for participation.
And Lundgren’s lawyers also did not share the court book, nor did they choose to share more litigation with the client.
If the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S has not bribed Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, to help Jyske Bank’s board to disappoint in legal matters. What do you want to call this?
Now read our letters to Lundgrens and see how consistently Lundgren’s attorneys, quite deliberately and in bad faith, did exactly the opposite of what their client repeatedly instructed their attorneys to submit to Jyske bank A/S
🙂
We share all letters to Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager, the Court, and Rødstenen here.
If there’s something you can’t find, text us at +4522227713
🙂
Jyske Bank’s corporate management hides for their customers.
🙂
But when you, like a half-crazy electrician without some book training, have to be your own lawyer while Lundgrens is out to disappoint in legal matters, it’s not easy. Picture is from the hospital where the client was rushed twice after his brain haemorrhage.
The customer keeps an eye on the largest criminal banking companies, and corrupt lawyer houses in Denmark.
–
If you think you can rely troust on Lundgren’s or Lund Elmer Sandager’s lawyers, or if you can trust Denmark’s second-largest Bank Jyske bank,
So just try to read along here.
–
Jyske Bank customer probably got a brain haemorrhage after Jyske bank A/S in 2008 and 2009 chose to start exposing his business.
–
To what looks like covert fraud, but Jyske bank made a mistake, they chose the wrong victim to take the ass on.
–
While Jyske Bank’s management.
At CEO Anders Dam, and board member Philip Baruch, and the bank’s other attorneys like here. Morten Ulrik Gade. and the law firm Lund Elmer Sandager. who by Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen. and Philip Baruch. try to get the case out of date.
–
While the lawyers present Philip Baruch manipulated evidence before the court, and, dishonestly, submits allegations that are untrue.
–
If you have any questions or do you think something is wrong and needs to be corrected, you can contact the customer by phone +004522227713
When law firms such as Lundgren’s knowingly counteract their client.
It can only be because Lundgrens has been bribed by Jyske Bank A/S
For not presenting their client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank A/S
REMEMBER BY LAW, LAND MUST LAND BEING BUILD
While earlier very ill customers have had to fight for survival, after what turned out to be a fraud of dimensions towards the customer, and done by the Jyske bank group
–
The customer who is well aware that Jyske Bank’s group management is laughed at these unhelpful. While the customer alone is up against the blatant criminal organization, and is still fighting against Jyske Bank to stop the bank from making fraud and fraud.
–
In this way, both Lundgrens and Rödstenen lawyers now turn out to be in charge of Jyske Bank’s interests.
This means that everyone must comply with the law.
And no one should undermine the Danish state, or the Danish legal system.
By entering into agreements with powerful friends, not to be investigated them for fraud.
🙂
When large companies such as Jyske Bank A/S is make fraud against their customers, it is then the customer, itself that has to fight the giant to stop the fraud.
Or it is not what the police are for.
When Jyske Bank appeared to use bribery against those of their customers.
To stop their clients ‘attorneys who are going to file their clients’ cases against Jyske bank A/S.
Then this is a country-damaging business.
Danish and intonational law, of course, also apply to Danish banks Jyske Bank and Lundgren’s lawyers.
The former client in Lundgrens, says here to Lundgren’s partner company.
You must stop taking bribes, or what the board of directors of both Lundgrens and Jyske Bank call it.
Dear Jyske Bank
will you not be nice to stop exposing fraud, since May 19. In 2016 we have tried to get your board to take responsibility and as a minium talk to us, but we are glad that in admitting there are no mistakes, otherwise you as a group would not continue to deceive us.
When Lundgrens in bad faith, chose to manipulate with the client.
And not to present their clients’ claims against the Danish dank JYSKE BANK A/S. which deliberately violates Danish criminal law, in many respects.
But this is not a matter for the Group Board. REMEMBER
We just ask to get in dialogue.
We definitely think that the board of Jyske Bank should meet and call +4522227713
And then admit and apologize for the bank’s fraud.
When yes and then find a grimace that can fit and say sorry
🙂
CEO Anders Dam Say no to dialogue with sour customer after the bank’s many years of fraud. Do not want to talk to customer but ask for a judgment in the case BS-402/2015-VIB Where the Corporate Management of Customer is Accused, for Notice in Serious Fraud Which is done by the entire group management in association
HJÆLP MIG AT SAGSØGE JYSKE BANK for bedrageri, falsk, svig, dokumentfalsk.
Just see the letter of September 1, 2019. to Lundgren’s lawyers with clear instructions, that the case is a fraud, and we claim that Appendix 1.
a swap from 16-07-2008 is false.
And we will summon 9 witnesses.
Compare the Prosecution 2. which Lundgrens submits to the court on September 2, 2019,
And will share some copies with the client. Lundgrens writes in Prosecution 2.
Nothing that the case is presented with allegations of fraud and false.
Lundgrens has removed 7 of the client’s 9th witnesses.
Lundgrens change the client’s claim that Appendix 1. is false, that Appendix 1. the swap is agreed.
LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER
Dan Terkildsen
Efter som hverken
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
Eller nogle andre i Lundgrens aldrig har ville fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Om Lundgrens advokater af Jyske Banks Koncern har fået bestikkelse i form af retur kommision, syntes Lundgrens advokat partner selskab ikke i skulle tilbage betale de penge i uberettiget har fået
And when we fire Lundgrens you will not repay our money.
Then Dan Terkildsen think they have done a great job, but it must be for the counterparty Jyske Bank A/S.
This is about your legal certainty.
Because if it turns out to be politicians, who stand behind and support that Jyske bank must not be investigated for fraud by the police.
🙁
With such clear evidence of both document false and mandatory fraud, then something is wrong in Denmark.
🙁
Where does Lundgren’s board stand in this fraud case, against Jyske bank, everyone is involved,
or only the client the 5 lawyers we have mentioned.
these 5 lawyers. at Lundgren’s partner company
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
🙂
Not funny.
But just try to read the letters we have sent, find them in our case, or follow along here.
Direktør & Chief Operating Officer
MARTIN KIRKEGAARD
DIREKTØR & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Bestyrelse
MICHAEL ALSTRØM
FORMAND
/
THOMAS KRÆMER
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
NINA RINGEN
/
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
TOBIAS VIETH
/
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
NIELS WIVE KJÆRGAARD
ADVOKAT (H)
Letters come a little below And inserted continuously.
This is a true story of when Jyske Bank stole from us 12 years of our lives.
While Jyske Bank exposes us to gross fraud.
And the fact that the danish bank Jyske Bank A/S used a document falsely, and make mandated fraud, even lied to the court, is just one of Jyske Bank’s business areas, when the board maintains that fraud is a great way to operate a bank in Denmark.
Anders Christian Dam has been able to stop the scam since May 2016, but he has refused.
Our home before we were exposed to fraud in Jyske Bank denmark
Watch the little movie. after Jyske Bank was slaughtering us, and ours had to be sold for a candy, to satisfy the greedy bank employees of Jyske Bank.
🙁
We also have to share photos from when our home was cleared after scams from Denmark’s second largest bank Here is a scanned copy of our own closing reply 28/10/2019 since Lundgrens seemed a bit corrupt and has not helped their client, but chose to help Jyske Bank against Lundgren’s own client, at the bottom you can see evidence that Jyske Bank has lied to the court, to disappoint in legal matters.
Have the house for sale at Boliga. and then at Danbolig. it was a claim from Birgit Buch Thuesen Jyske Bank.
It also became a requirement that the house be painted And the price had to be reduced to get it sold quickly.
That it was so grounded. The fact that Jyske Bank was actually slaughtering their customer after the bank exposed them for several years to fraud and fraud does not make the case any less complicated.
It may be that you think we are crazy.
But this is the truth about Jyske Bank’s business methods.
Methods such as Jyske Bank A/S will hardly only expose us.
And therefore it is a major Danish social problem.
🙂
Hope for your understanding and that you can read it as we explain.
After all, it is the small customer, in the large Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S
Who not only had to fight against serious illnesses, and then against Jyske Bank A/S who is grossly deceiving their customer.
But that we as a customer, have also really had to fight against our 2 most recently lawyers Rödstenen and Lundgrens, who must be extremely corrupt, since they have merged the pillars with Jyske Bank against us.
🙂
Birgit Buch Thusen writes that Jyske Bank has no responsibility for the failure to settle basic sales. Jyske Bank writes that as Nykredit bank they have not been obliged to help complete the sale of the forced sale plot, Birgit Thuesen also writes that we have found ourselves selling the plot. There are great forces the small customer is up against.
Jyske Bank’s debt collection department demanded that our house be sold.
Just as when Jyske Bank at Anette Kirkeby department head Jyske Bank Helsingoer, and Casper Dam Olsen Jyske Bank Hilleroed, sales of the building site demanded Bybjergvej 45.
Which Jyske Bank afterwards denies any knowledge of.
You can’t say a judge will look at the evidence if you pay the client’s lawyer not to present them.
Jyske bank is something special
Now we did not think that Lundgrens would harm our case against Jyske Bank A/S by simply not presenting it.
27-04-2011 Appendix 63.
S.1-2 It will be a requirement that the land be put up for sale by broker. Anette Kirkeby and Casper Dam Olsen. This is what Jyske Bank itself was just a recommendation.
13-04-2011 og 27 april Appendix 63. S.1-2
It will be a requirement that the land be put up for sale by broker. Anette Kirkeby and Casper Dam Olsen. This is what Jyske Bank itself was just a recommendation.
27-04-2011. Appendix 64.
The land is put up for sale by a broker, and the guarantee commission increases from 1.5 to 3 percent, Casper Dam Olsen and Anette Kirkeby Jyske Bank
Birgit Buch Thuesen Jyske Bank Silkeborg
Then refused to open a deposit account, or receive the sale proceeds.
The buyer could therefore not pay for the building site for over 3 years.
While Jyske Bank tries to harm their customer financially as much as possible.
🙁
In Jyske bank, the importance of forced is a requirement = voluntary
As today 2020, when the groups continue the bank’s fraud, by continuing to raise interest rates 5,32 %, also that part of the loan, that has been forcibly repaid, whether the customer has a swap or not.
But the management of Jyske Bank’s group is completely indifferent.
The Board of Directors has been there at least since 19-05-2016. been 100% aware that Jyske Bank A/S, by forcibly reducing an alleged underlying loan, to Jyske Bank’s swap, which is allegedly restructured, Annex D.
Without letting the Bank Swap. from 16-07-2008 Annex 1. follow down.
Remember that we have not agreed on any interest rate swap 16-07-2008, but have one from 15-07-2008 if we want to borrow 4,328,000 dkk. Appendix Y.
The fake SWAP 015785 Appendix 1. from 16-07-2008
This relationship from false changed Lundgren’s lawyers to be a contract.
But now look at the letters we have shared to Lundgrens and had actually submitted them
How much has Jyske Bank Group Management agreed to pay Lundgrens for not submitting their client’s claims? we just ask
Here you see the fake swap of 4,328,000 dkk, a result of Annex 1.
Which Jyske Bank itself made on 16-07-2008. without agreement with the customer.
But as Jyske Bank for every price wants the customer to deceived.
Here is the swap that was made on 15-07-2008 and is agreed with the customer if they take out an underlying loan of 4,328,000 dkk. in Nykredit, to the interest rate swap.
But Jyske Bank chooses not only to lie to the client, and so the client’s attorneys, even against the court, Jyske Bank A/S by Lund Elmer Sandager lies to want to disappoint in legal matters.
10-09-2015. S.1-52. Response BS-402-2015-VIB. To Jyske Bank’s Appendix K. and Appendix 1. which is alleged to be document false and there is more. much more.
10-09-2015. S.6-52. Response BS-402-2015-VIB. To Jyske Bank’s Appendix K. and Appendix 1. which is alleged to be document false and there is more. much more.
Here you can see that Jyske Bank consistently lies.
And likes to lie to the court as well.
As you can see, Jyske Bank has not only paid to the court. Jyske Bank Board member Philip Baruch has also withheld information.
As if the interest approved by the customer on 15-07-2008 exchange for the offer Appendix Y.
But also withheld that the swap will be closed 30-12-2008.
In addition, the bank’s attorney and board member Philip Baruch have also provided manipulated and false information to the court.
As the annual report 2008 Appendix O. where Jyske Bank has manipulated the annual report, and removed 2 agreement documents.
Jyske Bank did not come to say that it showed nothing to the bank when Philip Baruch himself presented Appendix E. pages 4 and 5 of the swap from 15-07-2008.
But in addition to this, there are many more manipulated and counterfeit documents, which supports that Jyske Bank’s organization is criminal, and that is what we are up against.
Read our submitted closing Reply of 28/10/2019.
We have had to make and present it ourselves, after we got a corrupt lawyer company, that turned out not to be reputable, just like Jyske bank A/S Denmark
28-10-2019. Final Prosecution Case BS-402 2015-VIB Claims Appendix 1 is False
Date 27-10-2019 presented with some spelling and typos as Lundgrens counteracted the submission of the case.
We have to complain a lot as there are some spelling and typos
But got only on the 13 scale 05 in Danish and 03 in English, and thus has no book education,
That was also why we sought help from Lundgrens lawyers, who work with several Danish banks.
For 43 months up to this submission, we have in reality been without a lawyer, although the last 2 have forgiven to be our lawyer, they have real work for Jyske Bank A/S
So for those of you who want dishonest lawyers, you must of course still choose Lundgrens lawyers or you can also choose Lund Elmer Sandager, who has shown they are willing to lie in legal matters as well.
15-07-2008. S.4-6. Philip Baruch accidentally presents the Swap from 15-07-2008, which the customer discovers in 2016 and starts an investigation of Jyske bank’s business methods.
15-07-2008. S.5-6. Philip Baruch accidentally presents the Swap from 15-07-2008, which the customer discovers in 2016 and starts an investigation of Jyske bank’s business methods.
Appendix 29. regarding swap W015776, which we approved on 15-07-2008, if we repaid the loan of 4,328,000 dkk. in Nykredit
This closes on 30-12-2008.
So when Jyske bank attorneys and the board of directors present to the court that appendix E. pages 4 and 5. are just replaced with appendix 1.
Then Philip Baruch must have been very confident that he could keep Annex 29, hidden (also page 2. of Annex 28.)
So we have to deal with cynical lies in this case.
Appendix O. As you can see, Jyske Bank has removed the approved interest rate swap W015776 on 31-12-2008, on which we signed an agreement on 15-07-2008, if we chose to repay the underlying and offered loan Appendix Y. for the swap, We rejected the loan, and therefore did not repay the loan offered, of Dkk 4,328,000 Appendix Y. and the agreed and approved Swap W015776 on the same and agreed amount. 4,328,000 dkk, closes 30-12-2008. during this period Jyske bank even makes an extra Swap for Offers. Y. is without agreement with the customer. Thus, there are two swaps at the same time on 16-07-2008, but otherwise forgot to create an account for Swappen Appendix 1. Therefore, it is a case of document falsification when Jyske Bank makes such an manipulation.
Appendix 30. Nicolai Hansen announces in February 2010. that we have borrowed DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit
And swap interest with Jyske Bank, Without disclosing it one with the swap we approved 15-07-2008 Appendix E pages 4 and 5. or the Jyske Bank has done behind our backs 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. thus the we claim is false.
Do we agree that this is what Jyske bank claims and has presented to the court
Bilag 28. efter stævning af Nykredit lykkes det at få oplyst, at der ikke findes noget lån. på 4.328.000 som jyske bank påstår og benytter til at lave svig.
That is, 1 year before the customer chooses 03-07-2009 to pick up, a late and other offer for a new project of 4,300,000 dkk
From 06-05-2009.
03-07-2009. Appendix AH.
The loan offer of DKK 4,328,000 from 06-05-2009 will be taken up, and paid out, to the customer’s new prospectus
Note that Jyske Bank still raises 5.32% in interest, and that of DKK 2,514,583.
While the customer owes Dk 976,439 on the loan the customer was offered 06-05-2009 at Annex AG.
And thus returned home on 03/07/2009 at an interest rate of 2,4987%
See Annex AH.
Was sent to Jyske Bank I.L.Tvedesvej 7. 3000 helsingore. After Jyske Bank then forces the plot Bybjergvej to be sold, and 3 years after goes to the loan repayment Annex AH. If Jyske Bank refuses to duck at Jyske Bank, the customer is forced into a legal battle, where Jyske bank also buys the Customer’s lawyers to work for Jyske Bank.
Jyske Bank has made this SWAP Case Appendix 1 on 16-07-2008.
Jyske Bank has manipulated the agreement date
and writes 15-07-2008. To hide the agreement Annex E pages 4 and 5. which is closed on 30-12-2008
Unfortunately, Lundgren’s lawyers is rooted, and does not follow litigation
and their client’s instructions
Although the court has written it to Dan Terkildsen, student Mette Marie Nielsen continues to re-use document number 18 now for the third time.
30-06-2020 outstanding debt 2,514,583.25 dkk page 1-2.
Dated 15-07-2008 but made by Jyske Bank 16-07-2008.
An interest rate for an underlying loans 4,328,000 dk.
There are none, although Jyske Bank several times also in legal matters, has lied this as taken home and rescheduled.
New Credit Term 31-03-2020. outstanding debt. 976,439.34 dk Principal 2,067,681.17 dk Offer 4,300,000 dk. Date 06-05-2009
admitted 03-07-2009
Compare 976,439.34 dk with Jyske Bank Raising interest 5,32 % of DKK 2.514.583.28. On 30-12-2020
The Jyske Bank Group is now deliberately, and dishonestly exposing their customer to deliberate and gross fraud.
🙂
We update the banking news page and make it more manageable.
Moves most subpages to the blog.
Instead, there are some pages where we describe Jyske Bank’s many violations of the Criminal Code, that is to say, economical crimes.
Regardless of whether Jyske Bank’s board members, have several political friends, who can have political influence, that neither the Danish police, the State Attorney, nor the Ministry of Justice have wanted to help the victim, who is exposed to gross exploitation and financial crime in Jyske Bank A/S, well and the brand is supported by Jyske Bank’s group management in association.
Although we did not think this is funny
We have only been able to fight against Jyske Bank, by writing about the group’s crimes against us as a customer.
Since the Jyske Bank Group management, with a very high probability, has paid our former lawyer
Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
By Partner Dan Terkildsen and his co-head, at least Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen, Pernille Hellesøe, Mette Marie Nielsen, Emil Hald Winstrøm.
Not very likely had plans to present the client’s claims in court.
A tenacity and humor even the management of Jyske bank must laugh at When a single deceived customer in Jyske bank, exposes himself to the mighty but deceptive Jyske bank management. Customer says to Jyske Bank’s Executive Chairman Anders Dam You are wrong and a lousy coward, unless you dare to engage in dialogue with the customers Jyske Bank exposes to fraud
Page about Jyske Bank’s claims and their denials, where at Jyske Bank A/S has written off our loan offered 06-05-2009 Appendix AG.
reduced with the sale, without letting the interest rate swap Appendix 1. follow down.
Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not.
The Jyske bank group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank knows this, and that the Board of Directors supports the bank’s fraud.
As Mette Marie Nielsen from Lundgrens said, when she called on 18 December 2018 approx. 5 pm and told
These are some very serious accusations we make against Jyske Bank.
To which Mette Marie Nielsen is informed, that she must look in the folder with the evidence, that she has personally been given.
The fact that the Danish lawyer’s houses, such as the law firm Rödstenen in aarhus, choose to cover up a bank’s crimes by directly opposing their client’s extension of allegations against Jyske Bank A/S never presented to the court, is critical when the same lawyer’s house Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, tries wanted to close the case against Jyske bank A/S, and claims it was agreed by telephone.
In one case we write to Thomas Schioldan Sørensen Rödstenen attorneys and ask if there is anything new in the case.
Advokaterne Thomas Schioldan Sørensen Rödstenen
Thomas answer so we have agreed to close the case, which he sent a letter about.
A little funny.
That this alleged letter has never come, only because we move we get stuck in the agreement Rödstenen and Jyske Bank A/S with great sense made to close the case.
When Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is claiming that there was a telephone agreement, between the plaintiff and 2 attorneys from Rödstenen in Århus, as a client, we would stand badly.
There are, after all, the words of Rödsten’s 2 lawyer against, the small plaintiff, who is up against Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank.
Fortunately we had already become suspicious that Rödsten’s lawyers could be corrupt, but could not prove it.
Therefore we have also contacted, our lawyer from the Appeals Board in Case 328/2013. Søren Narv, who has been extremely helpful.
And has in 2017 seen some of the papers we have found, and which did not seem to agree with what Jyske Bank A/S “Lund Elmer Sandager” has presented, Søren looks puzzled at the appendices and says.
If the documents are genuine:
Then it looks completely criminal.
That is why we decide, that it is probably best to record the conversation between the plaintiff and Rödstenens 2 attorneys.
Which should prove to be a good decision.
Since we have subsequently been able to prove that Rödstenens attorneys, at Thomas Schioldan Sørensen have lied in order to bring the case against Jyske Bank.
If Thomas Schioldan Sørensen still does not believe to have lied to the client.
Then we should like to lay the record on her.
And in order to help Jyske bank A/S, to disappoint in legal matters, partly by not presenting the client’s many fraud allegations against Jyske bank, with the worst would, Thomas have tried to close the case, behind the back of the client.
And in direct contravention of the customer’s instructions.
After the law firm Rödstenen, by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, is revealed to have acted dishonestly and dishonestly against the client, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen himself chooses to withdraw from the case.
But Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is not done
Thomas writes repeatedly and recommends that we give up as we have a very bad case.
Når banker som jyske bank bedrager / When banks like Jyske bank fraud
Which is not the case with Lundgren’s Partner Dan Terkildsen 28-08-2019. pm. 15.42 in mail writing.
Depreciation:
I think we have a good case if we stick to the very simple, as I have written earlier written that the swap agreement concerns a loan that has never been paid off.
Dan Terkildsen also writes in mail 28-08-2019
That Lundgrens will not use strong words about “should probably stand as” fraud and false.
Partly because we don’t have to.
And partly because it does not benefit our cause.
And not necessary.
In other words, Lundgren’s attorneys who were transferred to the case on February 5, 2018, and repeatedly instructed to present the case as fraud and false, now write August 28, 2019, that they will not submit it.
If not, because Lundgrens works for Jyske Bank A/S and will harm our case, simply by not presenting the client’s claims at all.
Then, before Lundgrens entered into their million kroner’s cooperation with Jyske Bank A/S, Lundgrens should have withdrawn.
That is unless this cooperation, was entered into between Lundgrens and Jyske Bank in order to disappoint in legal matters.
So when so many lawyers at Lundgrens, have actively helped not to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S
Then it smells of corruption and bribery done between Lundgren’s lawyer partner company and Jyske Bank’s group management.
Who with their over 100 employees, have actively chosen to help Jyske Bank A/S disappoint in legal matters, by not providing what the client has given instructions to provide.
This here feels like an assault and is outright evil, and dishonest business practices.
We already accuse Jyske Bank of being fraudulent.
Just read the sea there since Nov 2016 has been written on the car here.
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Glostrup. Denmark
–
Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade 9. in Copenhagen
But now also Lundgren’s lawyers for being corrupt.
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Since Lundgrens cannot find out to present our claims.
Like present our claim against Jyske Bank’s regarding the sale of the land, and thus an extra ordinary installment on the loan, from 03-07-2009 in Nykredit, which Jyske bank forgives to interest swap, without simultaneously reducing the swap, at the same time as the actual loan.
Jyske Bank, as always, denies whether it is help with money laundering, their poor advice or otherwise, Jyske Bank always has a different opinion.
But that Jyske Bank refuses to have anything to do with the case of the building site Bybjergvej 45, and refuses to close the transaction, as it took 3 half a year, before Nykredit finally replied, that they would now like to close the deal, even though Nykredit was not obliged to do so.
26-04-2012 Appendix 67.
Here Casper Dam Olsen writes to Nykredit, after forced sale that Nykredit has first priority and wants it cleared, Casper must be quite stupid
19-12-2015 S.1-2. Annex 77.
Mail to Jyske Bank Birgit Buch Thuesen, I have been informed that Jyske bank will not make a deposit account. At this time we do not know that we are subject to fraud
19-12-2015 S.2-2. Annex 77.
Mail to Jyske Bank Birgit Buch Thuesen, I have been informed that Jyske bank will not make a deposit account. At this time we do not know that we are subject to fraud
06-01-2016. appendix 76.
Nykredit writes that they will exceptionally create a deposit account after the basic sale.
Thus, we also had to pay interest on that loan in Nykredit and 3% in Contribution during the period when Jyske Bank tried to undermine our business financially, while also exposing us to fraud.
All of this here seems to Lundgrens not important, and it will hurt our case against Jyske Bank to present.
This is at least what Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen writes in his email 28-08-2019, and deliberately does not write our 9 witnesses, only the 2 witnesses that Jyske Bank itself wants to approve Lundgrens will be called.
Since Lundgrens does not submit one, of our allegations against Jyske bank A/S for gross exploitation and fraud
As Dan Terkildsen says it will harm our case
And that Lundgrens will not even send us a copy of the Prosecution dated 02-09-2019 supports our suspicion, of that Lundgren’s lawyer’s business is corrupt.
WHY
Dækker politiet os stadsanklageren over danske bankers bedrageri
–
The case is about FRAUD, Exploitation, withholding of evidence, document manipulation, and lying in legal matters, that’s some of Jyske Bank’s preferred tools in the bank’s struggle to disappoint in legal matters.
But we do not want to find ourselves in Jyske Bank A/S is deceiving, one is that the Danish police refuse to interrogate and investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, and say that you have to bring your claims even in the district court.
Jyske Bank has submitted supporting documents such as these to win the right to raise interest rates of DKK 4,328,000. At the same time, Lundgrens will not submit that the Bank has forced the customer to sell land, and reduce the bank loan in Nykredit Annex AH.
without Lading the interest rate swap down, Dan terkildsen says it will hurt my case to submit the seed something, and we will must agree with what Jyske Bank and Lundgrens must have agreed
Jyske Bank has repaid our loan 4,300,000 dkk offered 06-05-2009 Annex AG.
reduced by sale of building land, without leaving interest rate swap Appendix 1. down.
Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not
The Jyske Bank Group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank employees know it. and roughly Jyske Bank’s board of directors in association supports the bank’s convoluted fraud.
Jyske Bank’s management, believes that they have the right to take interest from Appendix 1.
And that it should be paid to Jyske Bank, That the customer has not discovered.
At the customer has not discovered, Jyske Bank has repeatedly maligned with appendices.
That Jyske Bank has succeeded in lying to the customer since 2008 / 2009 that the Customer has taken out the loan of 4,328,000 in Nykredit.
That it has succeeded in lying to the customer that the loan of the DKK 4,300,000 in Nykredit, has been repaid.
That Jyske Bank has succeeded in covering the swap, customer approved 15-07-2008 which was closed on 30-12-2008.
That the customer has not discovered that Jyske Bank has made one year’s settlement from 2008 Appendix O. where Jyske bank has removed an agreement attachment that starts on 15-07-2008 and closes on 30-12-2008
That the client was ill about 5 years after a brain haemorrhage, and therefore has not discovered the massive lies.
And that Jyske Bank has made a false document.
According to Jyske Bank,
The Jyske Bank must be harmed. And for safety’s sake, made an agreement with Lundgrens, not to submit any of the customer’s claims.
Well, they are proficient in the Danish banks.
Here are Appendices that should have been removed 20-11-2008.
But as Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors now uses towards their customer.
Appendices that should only be used if we wanted to repay the offered loan of DKK 4,328,000.
Nicolai Hansen got these attachments signed on 10-07-2008
Because they were ready, and assured the customer, that they would not be used if we did not take the loan offer.
ANNEX Y. Page 1/1.
Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000
valid until 20-11-2008
given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED
ANNEX Y. Page 1/6.
Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000
valid until 20-11-2008
given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED
ANNEX Y. Page 3/6.
Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000
valid until 20-11-2008
given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED
13-07-2008. Appendix X. has Nykredit sent to Jyske bank, a proposal to cooperate up a loan offer for a project 1. where offer Y. is submitted to Jyske Bank 20-05-2008, expires 20-11-2008
10-07-2008. S.2-2.
Annex Æ. guarantee statement DKK 4,328,000 made ready for if the loan offer Appendix Y. Taken home, this expires and is discarded, 06-05-2009
10-07-2008. S.1-2. Annex Ø.
Refinancing DKK 4,328,000 made ready if the loan offer Appendix Y. Taken home, this expires and is discarded, 06-05-2009 Bilag AG’s earlier mortgage deed and offers have thereby lapsed.
10-07-2008. S.2-2. Annex Ø.
Refinancing DKK 4,328,000 made ready if the loan offer Appendix Y. Taken home, this expires and is discarded, 06-05-2009 Bilag AG’s earlier mortgage deed and offers have thereby lapsed.
10-07-2008. Annex Å.
Non-payment of Dkk 4,328,000 made ready if the loan offer is wanted to be taken home, Appendix Y. has expired 20-11-2008. Jyske Bank tries on 15-04-2009 to accept the offer against the customer’s instructions
Appendix 7. S.1-3. the original power of attorney 10-07-2008 on a loan offer DKK 4,328,000 expires 20-11-2008 together with the offer.
ANNEX AG. Side -1.
JB receives 06-05-2009 Offer of DKK 4,300,000 for which NIcolai Hansen has requested a new offer. For the new project 2.
Appendix 49. 47. Appendix Y. Æ. Ø is stated expired page 7.
ANNEX AG. Side 1-6.
JB receives 06-05-2009 Offer of DKK 4,300,000 for which NIcolai Hansen has requested a new offer. For the new project 2.
Appendix 49. 47. Appendix Y. Æ. Ø is stated expired page 7.
ANNEX AG. Side 4-6.
JB receives 06-05-2009 Offer of DKK 4,300,000 for which NIcolai Hansen has requested a new offer. For the new project 2.
Appendix 49. 47. Appendix Y. Æ. Ø is stated expired page 7.
11-03 2019. S.1-2. Annex AK.
Jyske Bank presents Annex AK. which shows on May 22, 2009 is registered and mortgage deed of DKK 4,300,000
11-03 2019. S.1-2. Annex AK.
Jyske Bank presents Annex AK. which shows on May 22, 2009 is registered and mortgage deed of DKK 4,300,000
11-03 2019. S.2-2. Jyske Bank presents Annex AK. which shows on May 22, 2009 is registered and mortgage deed of DKK 4,300,000
But Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors will now use all shootings against their customers.
And try to get these cashiers’ attachments to be a disbursed loan in Nykredit, even though Nykredit has informed Jyske bank 06-05-2009 that they have lapsed.
Although Nykredit writes to Jyske Bank 06-05-2009 that the earlier offer and mortgage deed have lapsed.
Jyske Bank is in bad faith, and 20-05-2009 Resevere upward repayment to Nykredit of DKK 4,328,000, in connection with claims about more mortgage.
20-05-2009. S.1-2. Annex 73.
In connection with the required mortgage letter, Jyske bank has even registered a charge to Nykredit of NIS 4,328,000 and given Nykeredit’s revaluating mortgage, seen as raised on Annex 54.
20-05-2009. S.2-2. Annex 73.
In connection with the required mortgage letter, Jyske bank has even registered a charge to Nykredit of NIS 4,328,000 and given Nykeredit’s revaluating mortgage, seen as raised on Annex 54.
08-04-2011 S.1.
Annex 54.. the first bank statements we get. here it is seen 20-05-2009 raised 37,900 dkk for registration of mortgage 1.5 million, as Annex 73. See also Annex AG. pages 1 and 4. offers and mortgages have lapsed.
Annex 18 and 19. / 18-12-2018
Since Lundgrens Mette Marie Nielsen 18-12-2018 agrees to present these 2 appendices, as appendices 18 and 19.
It was almost during protest that I asked for more of my annexes to be presented but I did not have to, if more documents were to be submitted, Dan Terkildsen had to approve it, and he sat in a partner meeting.
You can hear Mette Marie Nielsen say on the recordings, that Lundgren’s lawyers had control with our case. Even dayes, before December 18, you can hear the assumptions Mette Marie Nielsen confirms that they will probably get it all and that it is controlled.
But the lawyers in Lundgrens who have their eyes on the case obviously have other plans, than to present our case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
Appendix 28. A as you can see here, the swap W015776 is closed. 30-12-2008 which we approved 15-07-2008 for the loan of 4,328,000 dkk which we have not taken up.
18-12-2018
Appendix 30. Nicolai Hansen announces in February 2010. that we have borrowed DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit
And swap interest with Jyske Bank, Without disclosing it one with the swap we approved 15-07-2008 Appendix E pages 4 and 5. or the Jyske Bank has done behind our backs 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. thus the we claim is false.
Do we agree that this is what Jyske bank claims and has presented to the court
–
Before you consider using or working for Lundgren’s attorneys, you should read the page here to know if Lundgrens is a corrupt law firm it is bribed to harm some of their clients’ cases.
Here a LINK to the same page. But in Danish
Here comes a LINK to all Appendix
You hopefully do not think this is too funny.
We have of course sent a jersey similar to CEO Anders Christian Dam, who has not even called and said thank you.
🙂
And why is Jyske bank so indifferent, and Lundgren’s lawyers who say it is damn well done with this advertising car, which since 2016 November has been seen in the Copenhagen street picture.
What we need is dialogue. Which Jyske Bank’s management refuses.
Then we need a lawyer, that’s what you read in the shared letters below.
But it is incredibly difficult of leading cases against criminal organs.
When plaintiff’s attorneys can be bought by defendants
When yes Jyske bank has then tried to get Thomas Schioldan Sørensen rodstenen.dk to lure us, to a meeting with Jyske Bank’s lawyer Philip Baruch,.
Which has clearly been to entice us to, accept a Swap for the loan we took home on 03-07-2009, but as nothing to do with Appendix 1.
Appendix 1. Which Jyske Bank board member also has lied to the court about.
You can also read in the letters we sent to the court the court has not ruled on any of the inquiries
Letters come a little below And inserted continuously.
You need to keep up as, we insert more and more letters, to help you understand how big this case has become. – Small for Jyske bank A/S But big for us, who have had, to present our claims to the court by ourself.
On this page, you should be able to see many of the letters we have sent on a regular basis,
for the most part that Lundgrens has not answered.
Read and see how we have been begging Lundgren’s lawyer partner company to help us, and present our claims to the court.
Which Lundgrens did not live up to.
🙁