Udskifte Opdateret 12-02-2020.
Tidligere forside velkommen er EN DEL ER PÅ ENGELSK 17-08-2021. flyttet hertil LINK.
The welcome page is moved See Appendix proving and proving that Jyske bank is doing mandatory fraud, fraud and document forgery, etc. call it what you want, BUT BE AWARE THAT JYSKE BANK MAKES US CUSTOMERS
The big criminal organizations in Denmark
Again a fun case from Denmark’s largest banks the Danish Bank Jyske Bank, and Lundgrens.
Don’t hope Jyske Bank, will try to buy our new lawyer by offering work like Jyske Bank bought Lundgrens, 07-02-2020
Jyske Bank’s corporate management at Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt, must be very proud of themselves.
At Jyske Bank A/S being able to buy or bribe the counterparty’s lawyer, Lundgren’s lawyers, to stop a client’s fraud case against Jyske Bank’s group, which the client had just recently employed Lundgren’s lawyers to present to the court.
Which Lundgren’s lawyers have most likely been bribed, not to present to the court, if you have a better explanation, please share it here +4522227713
Although both Jyske bank, Lund Elmer Sandager and Lundgren’s lawyers probably describe us as rather stupid.
How can Lundgrens otherwise, directly against what we say and write. Submit it to the courts, as if we entered into an Exchange Swap 16-07-2008 when we have repeatedly written the opposite.
That the Appendix 1. is false and that no new interest swap agreement has been made 16-07-2008 between Jyske Bank and the customer.
We repeatedly say that only an agreement has been made between Jyske Bank and customer, and this is Appendix E. page 4 & 5. from 15-07-2008.
Therefore we claim that Appendix 1. is False. but that is not what Lundgrens is submitting to the court, but we have none opportunity to changed it, as Lundgrens has written, statements that directly contradict the client’s fraud claims
We know that there are many spellings and mistakes as the client is dyslexic, but it is so bad that Lundgren’s lawyers cannot read and understand what we have repeatedly written to Lundgrens, and therefore Lundgrens does not respond to anything, very strange , hope you can read and understand what we mean, otherwise just call 004522227713
There are probably 100 letters and mails to Rödstenen Thomas and as many to Lundgren’s attorneys.
Where the client writes to Lundgrens to present their case as fraud, which Lundgren’s attorneys go directly against, and deliberately and dishonestly counteracts the Client’s claims against Jyske Bank for the court.
At no time will the Client be able to make corrections, and Lundgren’s attorneys submit their response papers, without having a single of their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank, and without securing the Client’s approval.
Lundgren’s lawyers have presented a case of bad counseling.
That’s not what we hired Lundgrens to present, and in case of fraud and fraud there is a 10-year limitation period, from the crime being discovered, by bad counseling there are 3 years.
It really looks a lot Lundgren’s lawyers actually work for Jyske Bank’s group in this case.
Or are Lundgren’s lawyers just corrupt and have been bribed by Jyske Bank’s group.
It is actually a very simple case we have against Jyske Bank.
And not presenting any of the Client’s fraud allegations.
Not summoning the witnesses the Client said should be summoned.
Not presenting the client’s evidence with explanation.
Not sharing the court book with the client.
And so in that Lundgren’s lawyers chose to work for the counterpart, while forgiving that Lundgren’s lawyers work for the client.
Without informing the client that Lundgrens also works for the counterpart Jyske Bank in a large case for millions in fees.
In major Fraud Chase, client discovered that Jyske Bank A/S had paid ther lawyers Lundgrens seems return commission.
It’s all about Jyske Bank’s honesty and credibility
Danes are forced to fight danish Banking group, to stop the Jyske bank’s fraud themselves.
As the danish state attorney does not believe, either
Jyske Bank A/S
Anders Christian Dam CEO
Philip Baruch lawyer
Morten Ulrik Gade lawyer
Will be punished for contributing to Jyske Bank’s continued fraud, supported by the mighty Board of Directors.
Why these advertising cars, have been driving around since 2016, without Jyske bank having a comment, but on the contrary refuse to talk to the customer.
The customer who just, in this funny way, tries to get in dialogue with Jyske Bank Group Board of Directors as Anders Dam.
One of Jyske Bank’s many small cases, but for us it is a matter of principle.
Allows the states danish banks to lie and make fraud ?.
Thinking that the management of Jyske Bank with this case, will show the Danes, that the group does not have to comply with any rules and laws.
And show that no one, should believe they can beat Jyske Bank in court.
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is the chief executive of the British branch of the Russian energy group Gazprom
Når selv toppen af dansk industri og erhverv er indblandet i at jyske Banks Bedrageri ikke bliver stoppet.
Er det sikkert også grunden til ingen har lyst til at pege finger af Jyske Banks koncernledelse, for medvirken til bankens mange års svigagtighed.
Which has almost half a million employees. Thus, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is one of the highest-ranking non-Russians in Gazprom.
Since the bank both lies, deceives, bribes to serve the shareholders financial interests, this is what we thought it was.
But when Anders Dam and the others in the group refuse dialogue.
We are desperate and just try to make contact, to ask what the hell the management is doing
If you as a reader in the customer’s diary, how the customer is exposed to fraud in Jyske Bank. If you have any questions about charges against the Jyske Bank Group, or the contents. So contact Carsten S Skaarup on +4522227713 As Carsten is a bit words blind, and probably not as clever as the overall board of Jyske Bank. Although Carsten says that Jyske Bank is doing fraud and fake, and has also bought our former Lundgrens lawyers, to work for Jyske Bank, why it must be bribery and corruption. Which we are exposed to here. While the management of Jyske Bank probably just laughs at the customers the bank, seemed rather stupid customers.
The Skaarup family from Hornbaek.Soevej 5.3100 Hornbaek DKSince February 2016 has we written and accused the Jyske Bank group, and the Board of Jyske Bank A/SJyske Bank has not wanted to review the site with us, so the management must agree.
A new member of the Jyske Bank Board of Directors will be Bente Overgaard, who is formerly Executive Vice President of Nykredit Bank
Who owned more than 10% of Jyske Bank A/S, and probably therefore chose to cover Jyske Bank’s Fraud against the bank’s customer.
Sven Buhrkall, who has been on the Board of Directors, at the same time as the bank’s fraud and fraudulent behavior towards small customers, is at the same time completely finished at Jyske Bank
The diary of the one Dane who alone is choosing, alone to go at war, against the second largest and state-supported danish bank Jyske Bank, in order to stop the bank’s fraud against small customers. David against Goliath.
And then ask your self, why the Jyske Bank Group does not appear from the court, in response to the closing reply in the Chase BS-402/2015-VIB
We warn you and the shareholders of Jyske Bank A/S against believing in some of the group, as we have presented more evidence, that the group is continuously lying.
And warn you against the management, which is the main issue for Jyske Bank’s fair credibility.
We look forward to having the fraud and false case against Jyske Bank dealt with in court, without further delay.
Jyske bank probably believes that the rich danish banks should not comply with Danish law.
As they Jyske Bank’s management have the shareholders full support, to violate even the criminal law, which must be the reason.
Why Jyske Bank’s group and CEO Anders Dam is doing, and continues with million fraud against the bank’s customers like us.
A defense statement that Lundgren’s lawyers should make, but our former lawyers Lundgrens.
Who had joined forces with Jyske Bank “call it what you want, we think it is bribery.”
And directly against the client’s instructions, Lundgren’s lawyers withheld all their client’s claims against Jyske Bank, thus they have not been presented to the courts by our lawyers in Lundgrens.
klik and see the FINAL PROCEDURE PAGE 1-52. DATE 28-10-2019. DANISH BANK JYSKE BANK IN MAJOR FRAUD CASE.
Now it is succeed in getting a lawyer as Jyske Bank’s management, can not bribe or buy for another task, if you want another word for payment of return commission.
Which customer thinks Jyske Bank used, when the Group bought Lundgren’s lawyers for another task.
It will hardly be investigated by the Danish police if Jyske Bank reports that it has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers.
Simply see, in a few appendices, what the client’s lawyer Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren’s lawyers would not provide, after Jyske Bank employees Lundgrens
The Danish courts have been informed that Lund Elmer Sandager by Philip Baruch has lied several times in legal matters.
Are you interested in owning one of these advertising cars for Jyske Bank when we replace them. please contact us on 004522227713
See the cars here. 10-01-2020
A New York pension fund is suing Danske Bank and four of its former executives for concealing its money laundering scandal, resulting in an artificial inflation of the bank’s share price.
A tiny customer alone is taking up the fight against Denmark’s second largest Danish bank Jyske Bank.
For more fraudulent relationships with the customer. Anette Kirkeby Jyske Bank Helsingør.
Thank you for ordering “now you have also become a bad customer”
When Anette Kirkeby, after Jyske Bank employees exposed the bank’s customer to several fraud cases, sent the customer to liquidation in 2013, at the green butchers in Jyske Bank Silkeborg, where Birgit Bush Thuesen stood ready.
“As in the night of the long knives”
Thank you to the many employees of Jyske Bank who, for several years, helped the Jyske bank group with the fraud against Jyske Bank’s own customer, several of Jyske Bank’s employees.
Like Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen who have subsequently moved to Jyske Bank’s branch in Hillerød.
Some have been promoted, such as Anette Kirkeby.
Anette Kirkeby started as a student at Jyske Bank on February 1, 1987, and in November 2003 Anette Kirkeby became head of Jyske Bank Erhverv Helsingør.
Anette Kirkeby was the business manager during the period 2008/2009, where Jyske Bank A/S chose to lie, and expose the bank’s small business customer for fraud.
Anette Kirkeby was thus the leader and contributing to the customer being exposed to many years of deliberate fraud.
Anette Kirkeby is for her good management skills?, Subsequently where Anette Kirkeby quit as department manager on 1 February 2014 when Anette Kirkeby is promoted to new department director of the Jyske Bank Group’s branch in Helsingør.
Fake and Fraud.
When Anette Kirkeby in 2013 at a meeting of Jyske Bank, with the client’s lawyer, Anette Kirkeby chooses not to inform the bank’s client or lawyer that the client has never taken out the loan 4.328.000 dkk for.
Which Jyske Bank has claimed and the bank has taken collateral and commission.
Anette Kirkeby has fully lived up to Jyske Bank’s foundation, and has now become chief executive of the group’s Helsingør division.
A big congratulations to Jyske Bank’s group management, which chooses to run the dishonest Danish bank Jyske Bank.
Where the group’s management team, at least since May 2016, has struggled to deceive Jyske Bank’s customers, rather than admit fraud, and stop the bank’s continuing fraud.
Welcome to Jyske Bank, a different and dishonest Bank, here the Bank’s clients must find themselves in Jyske Bank also buys the lawyers who hire clients to present the group’s fraud crimes, in order to stop Jyske Bank fraud.
The task of the danish police, is to maintain security, peace and order – to monitor compliance with the laws and to intervene in criminal investigations and prosecutions, but in Denmark this does not happen when the fraud is carried out by the Danish state aid banks
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Denmark
Jyske Bank Helsingor, where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
Lundgren’s got a million deal with Jyske Bank And then counter that Lundgren’s client’s claims against Jyske Bank were not presented in court.
If this is not a bribe then what is it?
The question is also whether Lundgren’s lawyers have helped Jyske Bank to continue the Bank’s Fraud against Business by having Lundgren’s lawyers directly opposing their client, after Lundgren’s lawyers were employed by Jyske Bank’s group.
OPERATES THE SECOND LARGEST DANSKE BANK JYSKE BANK COMMUNITY’S HARMFUL BANKING BUSINESS.
A case concerning the credibility of the Danish banks, and that a customer has even submitted to the court that Jyske Bank A/S. By the Group management is behind a million fraud against a small Danish company.
The Danish bank Jyske Bank is fully aware that the Group is fraudulent towards its customer. But now that the group management has December 20, 2019. our new lawyer has stated that the group does not want to meet as adults and talk together. So, of course, we hope that Jyske Bank in the future will not use dirty tricks to cover up our now-presented claims against Jyske Bank and also against Jyske Bank's management for contributing to the bank's continued fraudulent conduct. Probably we have only one lawyer, he alone, with the plaintiff, going against an organization that seems to work directly against not only against good practice, but also directly violated several of the penal provisions of the law. Of course, we accept the decision of the group and the board that we will fight in the Danish courts. We stick to actual conditions done according to the timeline So when we meet for a main negotiation, we will review what the Jyske Bank Group has exposed us to, and which the overall group still exposes us, ie their customer. Here we again ask if the Jyske Bank Group will not reconsider whether the Bank will not neglect to expose our customers to fraud. Or at least answer us, tell us why the Jyske Bank Group is constantly lying, and is completely dishonest. Because we do not lie about Jyske Bank's board when we write they contribute to our being exposed to fraud, regardless of whether Lundgrens did not think the management of the group has any responsibility here in the case. Anders Christian Dam is still welcome to call us on +4522227713 Even if Anders Dam has just seen something on BANKNYT that the group thinks is untrue, we should probably correct any mistakes, just in rings, instead of sticking our heads in the bush, and continue to hide behind Lund Elmer Sandager, who dare not meet either with us.
Jyske Bank even deletes bad reviews on Trustpilot to remove focus on the bank’s crime against their customers. We have received a Danish copy 27-12-2019 where the danish bank itself writes, that Jyske Bank is a completely reputable bank. In this connection we invite you to the main negotiation in Viborg court, then you can get confirmed and proved that Jyske Bank is a Unscrupulous, and Lying bank.
Diary of the crimes against small customers. Which Jyske Bank’s corporate management is all aware of, and which the board of directors has at least since May 2016, been continuously informed that the Jyske Bank Group is behind. And which Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors also has longer refusing to stop, Jyske Bank’s board of directors ensures that the bank’s exploitation and fraud against customers is continued in the association.
Dagbogen om de forbrydelser mod lille kunde, som koncenledelsen i Jyske Bank, alle er bevidste om banken står bag. Og som bestyrelsen mindst siden maj 2016, løbende er blevet informeret og oplyst om. At Jyske Bank koncernen står bag bevidst svig mod kunde. Svig som Jyske Banks bestyrelse ligeså længere, har nægtet at standse, Jyske Banks bestyrelse sørger for at bankens udnyttelse og svindel mod Bank kunde fortsættes, og at dette sker sammen med ledelsen, altså Svig forretninger udføres i forening.
Anders Christian Dam tells the newspaper BT. in 2016 That if Jyske Bank makes mistakes, the bank immediately corrects, ie then the management in 2019, and Jyske Bank after 3 years still exposes the customer to fraud, then there are no errors.
Jyske bank wants to fight against all customers, who want to try, to stop Jyske bank from deceiving them. Don’t think you are anything, when you have to fight against an apparent criminal organization like Jyske bank, then you are up against a monster institution.
The customer here just says to President Anders Dam call then and admit that you are behind the scams against us. Our number is +4522227713 Call us, Anders Dam if you dare.
No one should doubt that the customer is only trying to enter into dialogue with the group management. But Anders Dam does not care, Jyske bank only does what it usually does, and that is to make money, and that others then suffer a loss as a result of Jyske bank fraud, it is obviously the bank’s foundation.
We joust ask Henrik Høpner, from the Lund Elmer Sander lawyer whether it is okay that the company LES.dk He is a partner in Lund Elmer Sandager. And Lund Elmer Sandager is lying to the court, and this is to cover that Jyske bank, exposes the bank’s customers to Fraud and False. Whether it’s okay, that Jyske Bank, through their lawyers in Lund Elmer Sandager, is lying in legal matters, or not. Then dialogue would be the most natural way to find out.
Don’t trust Jyske Bank Silkeborg.
Stol ikke på jyske bank, en bank i Jylland Silkeborg, hvor bestyrelsen står bag bankens massive svindel mod kunde, er blevet forsat i flere år. Og det efter ledelsen er blevet oplyst om Jyske Banks bedrageri, som ved at have løjet over for kunde, at have løjet over for retten, at have forfalsket bilag, ved at rette i ægte dokumenter, ved at have misbrugt udløbet fuldmagt, og meget mere.
Denne sag handler om jyske bank og hvordan bankens konsernledelse i Jyske bank står bag masivt svindel af bankens kunde, så enkelt kan det forklares. Ledelsen er flere gange blevet opfordret til at mødes med kunde, og gennemgå dokumenter der viser hvordan Jyske banks svindel af bankens kunde kunne lykkes.
Følg sagen i retten BS-4025/2015-VIB Hvorfor mon kunden har måtte fryer de tidligre Lundgrens Advokater Hvis ikke det er efter mistanke, for at være blevet bestukket af Jyske bank, til ikke at fremlægge nogle af kundens påstande mod Jyske bank for svindel, eller groft svig som det er fremlagt 28-10-2019. En fejl. næppe. kom med ind i retten Viborg Og hør CEO Anders Christian Dam og Bestyrelsesmedlem Philip Baruch, forklare sig i retten.
Kunden der i Jyske bank er udsat for bedrageriet, vil i retten dokumentere at det er sådan Jyske bank koncernen arbejder. Det er Koncernledelsens medlem Philip Baruch som personlig står bag flere løgne i rettsforhold, der 20 december oplyser vores nye advokat, at den øvrige koncernledelse bag det fortsatte svig mod bankens kunde, som oplyser at Jyske bank koncernen nægter dialog. FØLG KRIGEN MOD JYSKE BANKS SVINDEL I RETTEN. En sag om Jyske Banks og deres ledelses troværdighed.
Jyske Bank koncern er alle opfordret til at forklare sig, og hvis der står noget banken ikke er enig i, så ring +4522227713 og oplys hvad, såleds vi kan rette op. Der er ingen der ønsker at beskylde Jyske bank for svindel, hvis det ikke er sandt.
Don't rely on Jyske Bank, a bank in Jutland Silkeborg, where the Board of Directors is behind the bank's massive fraud against customers, has been continued for several years, and after management has been informed of Jyske Bank's fraud, which by lying to the customer, to have lied to the court, to have falsified documents, to correct genuine documents, to have abused the expired power of attorney, and more. This case is about Jyske bank and how the bank's corporate management in Jyske bank is behind massive fraud by the bank's customer, so that can easily be explained. Management has been called several times to meet with a customer, and to review documents showing how Jyske Bank's fraud by the bank's customer could succeed. Follow the case in court BS-4025/2015-VIB the client has had to free the earlier Lundgren's Attorneys, on suspicion of having been bribed by Jyske bank, not to submit any of the client's claims against Jyske bank for fraud, or gross fraud as presented. A mistake. barely. joined the court in Viborg and heard CEO Anders Christian Dam and Board member Philip Baruch explain in court. The customer who is exposed to the fraud in Jyske bank will document in court that this is how the Jyske bank group works. It is Group Management member Philip Baruch who personally is behind several lies in legal matters that on December 20 informs our new lawyer that the other group management behind the ongoing fraud against the bank's customer, who states that the Jyske bank group refuses dialogue. THEREFORE, THE WAR IS TAKEN AGAINST THE BANK'S SCAM. The Jyske Bank Group is all invited to explain, and if there is anything the bank does not agree with, call +4522227713 and state what, so we can rectify. No one wants to accuse Jyske bank of fraud if it is not true.
This case is about the credibility of Danish banks
Jyske bank still has not responded to customer complaints against Jyske Bank A / S and Group management for contributing to serious fraud carried out in association, which the customer submitted on October 28
Warning against the Danish bank Jyske Bank Denmark’s probably largest criminal bank, Jyske Bank has chosen not to respond, and has not responded to the allegations made by the Danish bank against the exploitation of false and gross fraud by 28-10-2019
Our lawyer, in a summary presentation, will review what Jyske Bank has done with illegalities and when the bank has committed fraud in which Jyske Bank has lied to the court, together with an updated timeline.
Lund Elmer Sandager was given a deadline until December 11 . 2019 To answer in Jyske Bank’s closing reply, we have not received it 18 December, and therefore do not know what Jyske bank has responded to our closing reply of October 28, 2019. As soon as we know more we will share .
Would you choose a Danish bank to do business with, if you showed the Danish police will not investigate the Danish banks, for reported fraud and false against the bank’s customers, and that this is supported by the Danish State Attorney.
Vedtægter Jyske Bank A/S Danmark.
§ 1 Stk. 1: Bankens navn er Jyske Bank A/S.
Stk. 4: Bankens formål er som bank og som moderselskab at drive bankvirksomhed efter lovgivningen
– Men overholder Jyske Bank Loven eller EJ, det er det store spørgsmål. –
In this case, you must note the bank’s own statutes, which is comply with the danish law, which the danish bank REFUSES. When neither the police or the State Prosecutor will help, and several others cover Jyske Bank false and fraud agents the Customer.
Then we must fight, as best we can, if you want to help us stop the criminal Danish banks, can you call and say something to the bad guys in this Jyske Bank. Tell us, if we are stupid and need to correct. –
Vedtægter Jyske Bank A/S fortsat. Stk. 5: Banken drives i overensstemmelse med redelig forretningsskik, god bankpraksis og bankens værdier og holdninger.
– Hvad betyder det ? Hvis vi er udsat for svindel, SVIG. og det sker med ledelsens viden og accept, er det så Jyske banks holdninger at bedrage bankens kunder, og fortsætte med at bedrage kunder, sammen i forening. ?
Customer claims that Jyske Bank is fraudulent, and that the bank continues fraudulently so that the customer cannot afford to stop the bank’s fraud.
Bestyrelsen i Jyske bank #Koncernbestyrelsen #SvenBuhrkall #KurtBligaardPedersen #RinaAsmussen #PhilipBaruch #JensABorup #KeldNorup #ChristinaLykkeMunk #HaggaiKunisch #MarianneLillevang #Koncerndirektionen #AndersDam #LeifFLarsen #NielsErikJakobsen #PerSkovhus #PeterSchleidt
Since Jyske bank has bought and paid for our former lawyer to work for Jyske bank. Have we not really have a lawyer until November 2019. And when Jyske bank writes October 30, and asking the court, to disregard the client’s presented fraud and false allegations October 28 against Jyske Bank, to demand attorney’s injunction.
Surely so that Jyske Bank could again buy the new lawyer, not to submit fraud allegations, that is the very foundation of Jyske bank. Do you have another explanation ?. But this time the client in Jyske Bank has found a lawyer who is not corrupt and who has promised to bring the client’s case against Jyske bank and that according to the client’s own allegations from 28-10-2019.
Share our call for help, but just for your information some have been blocked BANKNYT.dk on facebook. Perhaps to cover the Danish criminal banks, and to hide the truth that Danish police will not investigate the Danish banks, that are reported for Fraud and Document Fake.
What is most illegal for banks. FIND JYSKE BANK Money laundering. Fraud. Document forgery. Exploitation. Maybe bribery.
Some of this and more, are Danish customers, in the Danish bank like Jyske bank exposed to. If you do not believe it, ask Jyske Bank +4589898989 they are allowed to answer you. The case is in the district court under case no. BS-402/2015-VIB
For the first time since we asked February 2016, the earlier lawyer to present our allegations against Jyske Bank, here we ourselves had to submit them October 28, 2019. You are also welcome to ask plaintiff +4522227713 And if you find anything, that may be wrong. Tell us and we correct it immediately.
🙂 We have found a new lawyer, who is not corrupt, and would like to present the client’s claims against Jyske bank. 🙂 Letters dealing with the case against Jyske Bank for fraud. Covers allegations and evidence against Jyske Bank, in case BS-402/2015-VIB. as Jyske Bank in several ways, has tried to prevent was presented in court.
– When our claims document is made, after our closing petition of 28-10-2019, will we share letters from these links. LETTER LUNDGRENS. Do you dare to trust Lundgrens lawyers, if the lawyers are corrupt ?. And cover the Jyske Banking fraud. ?.
LETTER LUND ELMER SANDAGER. Do you dare to trust Lund Elmer Sandager lawyer, if the lawyers are lying in legal relationships ?. And cover the Jyske Banking fraud. ?.
LETTER JYSKE BANK. Management and CEO Anders Dam. Do you dare to trust Jyske bank if, the Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors is lying in legal matters, to disappoint in legal matters. ?
LETTERS TO THE COURT IN VIBORG. Including appendix 28-101. Which we ourselves have tried to present on 28-12-2018
🙂 The journal Danish banks such as Jyske Bank have major problems in complying, with the law. Can Danish lawyers be bribed.
Which after 2 lawyers Redstone Rødstenen in AArhus and Lundgrens in Copenhagen. Would not present the chase to court, but as the Customer himself after 43 months here 28-10-2019 presents for the court.
🙂 You are probably wondering, why this page about Danish banks is made ?. 🙂 THE ANSWER IS. 🙂 This is a call to the big Danish banks, to not lying at their customers. With a view to getting an unreported income to the bank.
🙂 A loss from the customer, who becomes a income to shareholders, who actually own the banks. 🙂 An income that becomes a crucial asset loss for the customer. In Danish it is fraud. 🙂 We know that the large Danish pension funds, own large shares of the Danish banks, such as ATP. And these act just like Blakstone. Which the danish government has so much against.
🙂 But the problem with the pension funds, is they don’t care how their wealth increases. 🙂 We already know that banks such as Jyske Bank, which in their cases succeed in calling cases for bad advice. And that the bank then chases limitation which is only 3 years. 🙂 This is a socially big Danish problem. As the Danish banks do everything they can, to ensure that their clients do not discover that they are subject to deliberate bad advice. 🙂 At least not until after 3 years have passed, and here is where the banks chase the obsolescence. 🙂 As banks like here, in the case mentioned Jyske bank, seemed to speculate on getting all their obsolete. 🙂 IS THAT IS A PROBLEM 🙂 In order to secure Danish banking customers. The parliament is forced to change the statute of limitations to the banks. The statute of limitations on the Danish banks, must be up to at least 5 years, if not 10 years. 🙂 If this does not happen, the banks like here Jyske bank Will not change their business methods. As our case BS 402/2015-VIB is a good example of. 🙂 The law of good custom must also be changed. So that it becomes a law that is punishable by transgression. 🙂 If you look at the Danish bank cases, and judgments in through, from Danish banks like Jyske Bank 🙂 Will you be able to read that Jyske bank does a lot of telling in court, they do not have to comply with good practice. As it does not have any consequence to violate good practice rules for banks. 🙂 If the statute of limitations was, at least 5 to 10 years. And good customary law made. 🙂 Wild cases like the hedge case, swap cases and many more cases, for many hundreds of millions hardly to be found. 🙂 But now the law, is as it is. If the state parliament, wants to help the banks, then the law should not be changed with lying to their customers either. 🙂 And then the banks won’t change. 🙂 In our case. We have found that banks, like Jyske Bank do not care about the law. And probably have violated most of the law before crimes. Remember, since 2016 we have been running around with advertisements, about the case. And wrote about it in the diary banknyt.dk here. Jyske Bank has been fully involved in Banknyt Since October 13, 2016. And Lundgrens has been doing it. Since April 16, 2018. But they will not realize there is something wrong with their businesses. 🙂 But that we as a client also experience, Jyske Bank bribing our lawyers, not to present the client’s case, to the court. Is an extension, and this was not expected. 🙂 The case that the customer himself has to present the court. Is that the customer accuses, Jyske bank of fraud. And now also bribery, in the form of return commission. 🙂 You can read this in the allegation document from 28-10-2019. We share our closing response from 28-10-2019 here. Try and compare our response, with the Lundgrens delivered 18-12-2018 Look at the bottom of the page, banknyt.dk And ask Lundgrens and Jyske bank. If they have been some payment, for not submitting the client’s claims, to the court 🙂 See Banknyt.dk bank news 🙂 See Nyforsikring.dk new insurance 🙂 See Nyadvokat.dk new lawyer 🙂 See Rignu.dk rich now 🙂 See Hurtigrig.dk fast rich 🙂 And no this is not fun. We try to get the management of Jyske Bank to apologize and apologize. But not least to admit, it is just not okay, to cheat and deceive its customers. And that it happens with the management behind, as in association. The management has decided to continue the Jyske bank’s fraud. What can we do when the Danish police will not investigate Jyske Bank for fraud against our customers. Police chase 0100-83966-00085 🙂 Ask yourself about, is Jyske Bank an honest, fair, and reputable, Danish bank ?. Or is there something about the talk of Danish Banks being dishonest ?. And uses Danish banks to bribe, and lie in legal matters, to disappoint in legal matters. We only ask because it seems to be a FACT. – Or do you have an explanation. Why the client here, must both fight against their own bank Jyske Bank. And also have to fight with their own lawyer. Who directly work against their own client. In a case that is about being honest, and honorable. 🙂 And what about the great Danish law firms, like Lundgrens. Have these lawyers acted as a reputable law firm ?. 🙂 We will continuously share all attachments on, among other things, diary since bank new “Banknyt.dk” 🙂 And now remember this diary, is due to the overall board of Jyske Bank. 🙂 It is the full responsibility of the Board of Directors that we are exposed to fraud, and who do not want dialogue, and that is why we are exposed to fraud today. 🙂 We do not want the case, but we are up against Denmark’s second largest bank, which has a different view of good banking. 🙂 While we are still trying to meet the bank Group President CEO Anders Christian Dam, for an explanation 🙂 Lundgren’s lawyers, Dan Terkildsen, have said on their office, 13-08-2019 That Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has no responsibility. 🙂 We believe that Lundgrens, has only manipulated with us, not to present our claims, so that with the Jyske Bank Board of Directors having no responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud, we do not agree 🙂 WE WANT DIALOGUE 🙂 And, therefore, again asks the chief executive CEO Anders Dam to re-examine the matter 🙂 Isn’t something wrong 🙂 If Jyske Bank did not make money in the pants, then of course we have to pay Jyske bank their money. 🙂 But that we have to be exposed to this is outright evil. 🙂 Dear all of you at Jyske bank. Lund Elmer Sandager. Now read the letters we have sent since the beginning of the case. And see if there is something completely wrong. CALL US +4522227713 🙂 This is not written in a bad sense. But only like a breath of fresh air, to research your business for the way you make money. 🙂 From here the very best regards, to the Group Board of Jyske Bank Denmark. Storbjerg Erhverv Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek Danmark +4522227713 🙂 Hope this soon becomes a forgotten cause and we together can laugh at it. so look forward.
WHAT HAVE WE DONE THE DANISH BANK. SINCE THE JYSKE BANK EXPOSING US FOR FRAUD. WHAT HAVE WE DONE TO THE BANK. SINCE JYSKE BANK IS LYING TO THE COURT. WHAT HAVE WE DONE THE BANK. SINCE JYSKE BANK, HAS BOUGHT OUR LAWYER, TO WORK AGAINST US, AS THEIR OWN CLIENT. WE DON’T KNOW THEY WILL NOT TALK TO US MAYBE YOU CAN EXPLAIN US WHAT HAPPENS TO JYSKE BANK.
This is a call. Help us get the Danish Bank Jyske bank not to expose us to more FRAUD, we do not know why the bank is fraudulently against us, and they will not stop, what should we do, our last 2 lawyers, have the bank, reasonably bribed not to present our claims to the court. help us, seen a lot of rubbish in the Danish banks, money laundering and fraud in large style. Danish banking news banknyt.dk
This is our diary.
If you want to help us stop the Danish bank’s Jyske Bank scam against us, then please donate a small contribution to our account, for lawyer assistance.
Either Jyske Bank's corporate management is deeply criminal, and wants Jyske bank to be a criminal organ institution, or they have not even discovered we are trying Jyske bank should just spot us, and realize that Fraud against the bank's own customers is a bad thing. Remember this is not a bad announcement, but you know very well that we just want us to go through the case together, because it may not be true that Jyske Bank has paid our 2 most recent lawyers Rødstenen to try to close the case behind our back, and Lundgrens and Rødstenen for not presenting some of our allegations against Jyske Bank for Fraud and False. It must certainly be an evil dream, and we are part of a Danish criminal history that has not been seen before. REMEMBER THERE MUST BE 2 FOR TANGO Anders Christian Dam should we not meet and talk about this here, then it can not be true that Jyske bank's group management really wants to deceive their clients, and lie to the court, and then just bribe the client's lawyers, it does not fit? Well CEO Anders Dam Jyske Bank
Do we have reason to believe the Jyske Bank Group has paid bribes to Lundgren’s lawyers ?.
And that Lundgren’s lawyers have accepted this bribe, in the form of a return commission, for not submitting client’s claims against Jyske Bank for million Fraud and False
And do we have reason to believe that Jyske bank paid our lawyer LUNDGRENS, to disappoint in legal matters, by not presenting the client’s claims to the court.
Just as Jyske Bank’s board member Philip Baruch of Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys has “lied” or written untrue to the court, and that this has also happened to disappoint in legal matters.
Or is it normal that the big Danish banks and large law firms, in fact, lie and deceive the Danish society in order to earn an unjustified income, which will be a loss to their own clients
Read more about Lundgren’s lawyers and the danish bank Jyske bank here. And answer us if we have reason to believe that Lundgrens is corrupt, or we have a lively imagination, we have until now had to fight all alone, against a big fraud bank, we believe that Jyske Bank has outbid Lundgrens, to counteract our fraud case, was not presented to the court, and we therefore had to play a lawyer ourselves, just laugh at us and think we are stupid, but this is too gross and then it is claimed that Denmark is the least corrupt country, so it does not look good in the more corrupt countries. If Jyske Group Management at Jyske Bank looks back at what we have sent to the Board of Directors and AndersDam since 2016, then you can not understand it is just dialogue we try
Hvad er bestikkelse for en grim ting, når vi mistænker Jyske Bank for at bruge bestikkelse, til at få Lundgrens til ikke at fremlægge klientens påstande. Så klik på teksten og lær
This is how the fraudulent customer at Jyske bank perceives the management’s actions. / Jyske Banks lawyers Lund Elmer Sandager who is lying in court for trial. Management, including Director Anders Dam, has been known about the fraud and fake in Jyske Bank since May 2016. See www. NY ADVOKAT.dk.
Denmark's perhaps biggest banking scandal during escalation. Dear Lundgren's lawyers are deeply involved in Jyske Bank fraud, against small business has not been stopped. You can call +45 22227713 and get all the information ,? but they already have :-) - But what do you Lundgrens think about our allegations and evidence against Jyske BANK about the fraud chase. Dan Terkildsen said August 13 that the Board was not guilty of anything, but he will or have not comment on of our claims ? That is very strange ? :-) After being discovered at Lundgrens, is working for Jyske bank, and you were fired, 25 SEPTEMBER. We asked you to send our material back to Hornbaek, the material has not been received. Please send it by GLS to Shell Hornbaek. Incidentally, Lundgren's attorneys should not contact our new attorney, as he Lundgrens is an Inhabian, and you have done enough harm. We also asked you to pay back, the money we paid to Lundgrens. Your partner Dan Terkildsen has denied to pay is back, he believes that Lundgren's lawyers have done a great job for us, but the fact is that Lundgren's has directly cost us far more off time. So you should consider, whether you should not have anything on top of it, and in this way competencies fore that we could have lost the case due to Lundgren's lawyers. But now we're writing this on the site, so many others in Lundgrens can reading it. / We are a customer of Jyske Bank, you have our account number. USE IT. / But now you still work for Jyske Bank Would you like to tell the group management Anders Dam, that we do not want to be deceived. We want to meet and have no interest in writing anything untrue. After all, the question is whether we are right and can prove we are right. What does Lundgrens mean? you never told us that. Feel free to leave a comment on Facebook, Twitter for updates. Best regards from Storbjerg Business Soevej 5 3100 Hornbaek
To those who trust that Denmark is not a corrupt country.
The question is more how many people in Denmark use bribery or corruption to achieve something, like here to keep a case of millions fraud out of court.
Only after 44 months of continuous work, probably 3,000 hours of work, do we succeed in getting our claims against Jyske Bank presented to the court
As we only after, we ourselves have made sure to present the client’s fraud claim against Jyske Bank, in the Danish courts.
Then our new lawyer takes over and makes the new allegation, with a whole lot of new allegations.
What we have asked for presented since 2016.
So not new allegations, but just a whole lot of allegations that our now fired lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers refused to submit, as their cooperation with Jyske Bank did not allow a fraud case
Against the same Jyske Bank.
Then we got a new lawyer on the case, and looked at the annexes. A customer of Jyske Bank does not understand why Anders Christian Dam will not just meet. – – A customer of the Danish fraud bank, in connection with the firing of their lawyers Lundgrens, for apparently having received a bribe from Jyske Bank. Maybe directly by CEO Anders Dam for not presenting the client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank A / S. The Danish courts have announced this is why Lundgren’s lawyers are retiring. In Danish, has been fired. – Which Jyske Bank Board member Philip Baruch, by Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater has rejected should have happened. / Lundgren’s lawyers have commented that these disqualification issues are purely conspiracy theories, and have nothing on them. Whether Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen himself should be called as a witness. And the court can explain why Lundgren’s lawyers have not presented the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank for fraud and fraud, while Lundgren’s lawyers. Presumably by Jyske Bank has been given Lundgrens around 15-20 million Danish kroner to give Jyske Bank advice. Which could provide a better illumination of Lundgren’s moving grounds, to thwart their small client.
Who now for a third time must have a new lawyer. / Since Jyske Bank has strongly distanced itself from possibly having used a return commission, or a bribe in the case, in order that the applicant’s claims against Jyske Bank should not be presented i court. The plaintiff has therefore just 1. November submitted an Appendix 168. Becomes 168.A in the case The annex is from Lundgren’s website, where they write that Lundgrens has advised Jyske Bank, in a transaction for a three-digit million amount, in Danish kroner. “More precisely about 600 million Danish kroner.” / After the fraudulent exposed client in Jyske Bank has met with their new lawyer. And that has gone through the case, and is confirmed in the fact that these are not conspiracy theories, but that they are facts. The client tells their new lawyer that they are actually satisfied that Jyske Bank is convicted of fraud and forgery false. Following the allegations which the plaintiff himself had to make in the closing plea, which Lundgrens was certainly paid not to present. – Clearly, the plaintiff would have included the seriousness of Jyske Bank, in all likelihood, bribing the plaintiff’s lawyer, not to present the client’s fraud allegations against the defendant danish bank Jyske Bank. / Prosecutions directed directly at the bank’s overall Board of Directors to stand together in association with, the Jyske Bank Group’s continued and very serious failure business against the bank’s customer. / The plaintiff also states that in three submitted letters from 2018, the group management is all offered that they could actually discharge their mandate. Know that the board members who chose to sign Jyske Bank has been exposed to fraud for a number of years and will no longer be contributing to Jyske Bank causing fraud, the members could sign and return the letter to the applicant. – By signing, the members of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors could be exempt from liability. It is stated that not a single member of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors / Group Management has wanted to stop the fraud against the bank’s customer. / That with the inner circle in Jyske Bank by CEO Anders Christian Dam, seems to have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, through the use of a return commission. The applicant’s allegations against Jyske Bank appear to be corroborated only as true charges. – When Jyske Bank is ready to lie in the court itself, by Lund Elmer Sandager and in this case has lied to the court, to want to disappoint in legal matters, and then to continue deceive the bank’s customer. / / CEO Anders Christian Dam CALL NOW 0045 22227713 This is a continuing hand, which since May 2016 has been hould out against Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. And most be especially clear to you Anders Dam. – If you have found something that does not fit, then let’s meet and review the evidence, tell us which places Jyske Bank disagrees with the dokumation. If there is anything about Jyske bank and the management says that is untrue? Should we then not meet, and at the same time get the places that have been written accusations against Jyske Bank if there is no team in any of the accusations. – This small matter, Jyske Bank’s foundation emphasizes, and running a fair banking business is not part of the board’s wishes. If we are wrong, we ask the Jyske Bank Group Management for dialogue. Anders Dam old boy, call now at +45 22227713
And let’s meet, we’re a little tired of one-way communication, after all, it takes 2 to have a dialogue. / / The applicant states that they would still like to receive the court’s offer of litigation. Which Jyske Bank has shown no desire. / That the plaintiff has repeatedly asked the management of the continuing fraud to meet, no one can doubt, therefore we would like to repeat Jyske Bank is welcome Just call. Show that Jyske Bank is an open and reputable bank Show that Jyske Bank is a fair and honest bank. IT SHOULD NOT BE SO DIFFICULT. / / In Denmark it is David against Goliath Thus, the largest Danish banks do business. And all customers are as vulnerable as we are, the question is just who will be the next victim of Danish bank fraud. Remember this here is all our thoughts in an open diary. / / The plaintiff’s new attorney has obtained a copy of the closing plea of August 28, 2019. The plaintiff, who is poor at writing, and probably also slightly dyslexic, has stated that there are some typos and corrects these errors to the best of his ability. But as a starting point, the lawsuit contains the allegations that Rødstenen’s lawyers and Lundgren’s lawyers have countered were presented. Whether Lundgren’s lawyers saw Jyske Bank’s Group Management been honored for helping Jyske Bank keep the fraud case out of court by continuing a case of bad advice. You can think about for a bit of time. / Jyske Bank can be contacted here +45 89898989 the company Storbjerg Business Soevej 5. 3100. Hornbaek Denmark Phone 0045 22227713
When it comes to Danish banks, it’s about cheating their customers as much as possible, and banks like Jyske Bank go so far as to expose customers to fraud. Then it is only a moment before some customer finds evidence that the Danish bank Jyske Bank is going really far for their shareholders. We can mention here a few of them, Nykredit, Codan, ATP. Atp’s board of directors does not mind Jyske bank exposing customers to fraud, and will not interfere.
Falou the small players fight against the evael big danish bank Jyske Bank at www Banknyt dk
Being a customer of a large Dansk Bank can pose a greater financial risk. Therefore, you have to be very careful about trusting the Danish banks. If there is anything you cannot understand then call 0045 22227713 / Here we tell just about one simple little case. A case is likely to have hundreds of similar cases, like the fraud case here That the Danish police do not care that Danish banks, like here Jyske Bank exposes customers to fraud, is not very lucky. But this time, a customer has resigned, asking Jyske Bank to stop their continued criminal activities. As the fraud the small Danish customer is exposed to in Jyske Bank. / When Danish banks like Jyske Bank deceive customers, and it happened openly without the Danish authorities intervening, it is very unfortunate, and frankly, for the trust in Denmark. / Has Jyske Bank bought and paid more than the applicant's lawyer, from Lundgren's lawyers. Maybe a stupid question, but if Jyske Bank is not behind the bribery of a client's lawyer. ? :-) If the great Danish lawyer company Lundgren's lawyers. Has a good explanation as to why the lawyers have not presented the plaintiff's allegations against Jyske Bank for fraud and fraud Then the former client would like to hear Lundgren's lake explanations. You have our number +45 22227713 / With this, Jyske Bank's return problem, with the bank's credibility. Then the big Danish money laundering cases appeared to pale in the face of Denmark's second largest bank fraud. / Other customers who believe they are also at risk of fraud are calling to come forward and help stop the criminal Danish banks. As the plaintiff in the case against Jyske Bank A / S says, do not be a customer of Jyske Bank and get sick, so the bank will fuck you. / The customer's former lawyer from Lundgrens, received in February 2019 a letter from Jyske Bank through the Danish courts. Here, Lund Elmer Sandager writes that the plaintiff commits criminal acts by sharing more evidence on Banknyt dk. And explain that all charges against Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys and against the management of Jyske Bank are groundless But why didn't the Board call the plaintiff?
Customer catches the BIG Danish bank “Jyskebank” in a million scams.
You probably already know that several Danish banks, have made money laundering for billions. And that the Danish state first ruled on money laundering, after the criminal activities, through the press now was published. And and after Estonia, asked a large Danish bank, to close their banking business in the country.
Most of our post about criminal Danish banks, it is written in Danish, but further down on BANKNYT.dk Have we tried in English to explain, how banks in Denmark, through corporate management, do and continue to make fraud.
We are trying to explain about, Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank, and that it is the board of directors ther continue ther fraud themselves.
That is the board members ther is behind the bank’s fraud and exploitation of their customers themselves.
🙂 We is refer to ourselves, if you have any questions, please call us at.
If you have any questions for the Danish bank, you can call them at.
The Chase BS 402/2015-VIB
The bank directions CEO Anders Christian Dam respond again.
After the bank customer, and client asks their lawyer, Lundgrens Dan Terkelsen, to present the client’s claims that Jyske Bank is doing fraudulent transactions.
And after that the bank has learned about the new lawyer, Jyske Bank even themselves contacts the client’s Attorney.
And offers the client’s attorneys Lundgrens a large million task.
And the Danish bank jyske bank, enter into a million agreement, with the client’s attorney’s Lundgrens lawyer. And afterwards, will the lawyer company Lundgrens, not present any of the client’s claims off fraud to the courts.
The client thinks therefore the bank Jyske bank, have bribed, their lawyers from the firm of Lundgren’s lawyers, not to present the client’s allegations, and evidence to the danish court.
In all ways, since May 2016, we have been trying to get management I Jyske Bank to talk to us. Unfortunately, the Danish bank Jyske Bank is determined, that the members who are together in the association, would rather continue the bank’s million-dollar fraud. Rather than talking to the deceived customers who question the credibility of the Danish bank.
The Danish police have refused to investigate Danich Banks ass Jyske Bank for fraud, and now there is also suspected corruption, or bribery, if you want to call Corruption for bribery.
You can ask yourself if Jyske bank is the only Danish bank doing fraudulent transactions. or whether corruption is more widespread in Denmark than our case suggests.
Since we have had to fire Lundgren’s lawyers, for directly to go against our case, against Jyske Bank.
And that nothing from the fraud case has been presented to the court.
And therefore, 43 months after the scam was discovered, we still have not made any of our claims we must therefore again have a new lawyer.
This time, we take one that Jyske Bank Group Management cannot bribe, with offers to take work for Jyske Bank, what we call the return commission.
If Jyske Bank’s Executive Board with CEO Anders Dam wants to meet and talk to us. Then we like to give thunder coffee, then Anders Dam can bring the cake. And then we could sit down together and as adult people, then talk together.
/ IT CANNOT BE SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND
WE DO NOT WANT THIS CASE. BUT THE QUESTION IS
IF WE ARE RIGHT AND JYSKE BANK’S BOARD MEMBERS REFUSE TO ACCEPT IT.
So Jyske bank has a pretty big problem.
Are you still amused by your power to deceive the bank’s customers, Anders Dam
we do not think it is fun to be deceived at Denmark’s second largest bank. And offers CEO Anders Christian Dam A GOOD COPY THROUGH COFFEE. ANDERS DAM, SO YOU CAN GIVE THE CAKE
And Anders We still live in Denmark on Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek
Phone +45 22227713 You may also want to call us, let’s meet.
Se more at Banknyt dk
#news #finans #banks #stokes #JyskeBank #AndersDam #Politi #dkpol
Jyske Bank A/S bag gennemført bedrageri mod bankens kunde, der nu igen må finde sig en ny Advokat, som ikke lader sig bestikke af Jyske Banks koncernenledelse.
see more in English further down
En bank der er ligeglade med hvad der står i loven, det er jyske bank vores påstande for svig og falsk er rettet imod.
Det eneste kunden ønsker, er at den samlede bestyrelse i jyske bank indrømmer, at jyske bank A/S står bag Bedrageri “SVIG” mod bankens kunde, og at bestyrelsen mindst siden maj måned 2016, har været vidne om bedrageriet, og frem til nu, har nægtet dialog med den bedraget virksomhed, bestyrelsen har ligeledes ikke ville stoppe jyske banks fortsatte svigforretninger, som koncernenledelsen har rettet imod bankens små kunder, syge som raske, bare for sjov.
Det er da også utroligt at Lundgrens advokater, der har fulgt med på BANKNYT dk. mindst siden 16. april 2018, altså da Lundgrens advokater bevidst og uhæderligt, vælger at indgå en million aftale med jyske bank, i forbindelse med en handel for over 1/2 milliard kroner.
Altså efter vi den 5. Febuar 2018. har overbragt, og dermed givet Lundgrens advokater vores sag, mod jyske bank for svig og falsk.
Lundgrens som stadig føler løbende med BANKNYT, skulle heller erkende, at Lundgrens advokater ikke skulle have forsøgt at tage røven på deres klient, og indrømme at Lundgrens havde planlagt bag klients ryg, at ville møde op i retten mod jyske bank.
Uden at have fremlagt, en eneste af klientens påstande mod jyske bank, for nogle af de mange forhold af svigagtig optræde, overfor retten.
LUNDGRENs GIV OS NU, VORES PENGE TILBAGE. I HAR TAGET RØVEN PÅ OS, SYNYDT OS. MENS I HAR ARBEJDET FOR JYSKE BANK DIREKTE IMOD OS.
Inden du kalder kunden her tosset, så læs siden, og print beviserne for Jyske Banks bedrageri ud.
SNART VIL ALLE FREMLAGTE BILAG 1-167 & A-AM breve processkrifter mm blive delt, du kan allerede nu rekvirere en kopi af sagen, enten på en USB, eller udprintet, sagen fylder 4 mapper, som dem advokaten fik i sidste uge, selvfølgelig findes der mere. SMS 22227713 hvis du vide mere.
Og spørg dig selv, hvorfor jyske bank, ikke vil svare kunde, og ingen kommentarer har til at flere biler, kører rundt med negativ omtale, som beskyldninger mod jyske bank for Bedrageri, Million Svindel, Svig og Falsk.
Hvis det bare er noget vi har misforstået, må det da være i jyske banks interesse at afdække sandheden, kan ledelsen ikke selv se det virker meget mærkeligt at blive beskyldt for bedrageri, og nu mistanke om korruption / bestikkelse, og så nægter at mødes med os.
Vi taler om at bankens afdeling på Vesterbrogade, der i øvrigt er medvirkende til svindlen, som er udført ved hjælp af dokumentfalsk. SAGENS BILAG 1.
Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade blev kontaktet første gang i november 2016, af en kunde på Østerbro, der sender billeder af jyskebank bilen, og spørger Jyske Bank hvad dette er for noget, han spørger også om Brask Thomsen stadig huserer i banken. “Tidligere FINANS BANKEN.”
Når kunde beskylder Jyske Bank for svig og falsk, strafferetligt Bedrageri samt Dokumentfalsk, og nu også mulig bestikkelse af Lundgrens advokater.
Hvis det er grundløse og grove beskyldninger mod Jyske Bank A/S og Bestyrelsen, så lad os sammen gennemgå hvor der står noget forkert, så retter vi, med et smil.
Så kan vi jo også lige
Er det så ikke noget vi kan tale om, frem for at Jyske Banks Advokater 1. Februar fra Lund Elmer Sandager, ved Philip Baruch, Dorte Halken, hælder vand ud af 👂 ørerne, til retten og Lundgrens advokater.
Hvad jyske bank februar 2019 mener med at sagsøger begår Strafferetlig overtrædelser, ved at benytte ytringsfrihed, til at fortælle om at jyske bank laver svig forretninger, og udsender advarsel til jyske Banks kunder, og orientere aktionærerne.
Jyske Bank er stadig velkommen til at komme med deres forklaring, på hvad jyske bank og LES mener med sagsøgerens anklager mod Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager for at lyve overfor retten, og for at have bortskaffet bilag, at have fremlagt falske beviser, løjet for at skuffe i retsforhold, intet har på sig, måske Jyske Banks Advokater skulle aftale et møde med sagsøger, dette har sagsøgeren, forsøgt siden 2016
Altså at komme i dialog med jyske Banks ledelse, siden maj måned 2016
🙂 men når Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater påstår Sagsøgeren overtræder loven og dermed straffelovens bestemmelser,
HUSK AT DU SKAL IKKE KASTE MED STEN HVIS DU BOR I ET GLAS HUS.
Bankens svar, det er ikke noget, og banken er ved at løse problemet.
Og hvorfor syntes nu 2 af kundens advokater, at være blevet bestukket af jyske bank, til ikke at fremlægge deres klintens påstande mod jyske bank, for svig og falsk, Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab som den seneste.
Hjælp os med at standse Jyske Banks konstante, og fortsate svig forretninger imod bankens kunder.
VI FØLER DET SOM OM VI ER MEDVIRKENDE I EN DANSK KRIMINAL HISTORIE, OG SÅ ER DET BARE DAGLIGDAGEN, FRA DET VIRKELIGE LIV.
Dette er en Advarsel imod #JyskeBank A/S & en Advarsel mod #Lundgrens advokater, dem kan du ikke stole på, undtagen hvis du har en bank, så kan du syntes det muligt, at du kan købe dem, er Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab til salg for højst bydende.
Advokat Partner Selskabet Lundgrens advokater, ved den erfarne advokat Dan Terkildsen, blev 24. “25” September 2019 fyret på gråt papir.
Klient i Lundgrens Advokatfirma, må nu for tjede gang have ny advokat, efter deres advokater i Lundgrens Advokatfirma, som ellers skulle varetage deres klientens interesser, mod jyske bank for svig, er blevet opdaget i dirækte at have modarbejdet deres egen klient.
Lundgrens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, har imod alt hæderlighed, og dirækte imod god advokat skik, imod klientens instrukser, om at skulle fremlægge adskillige svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank A/S, ikke ville efterkomme nogle af klientens anmodninger.
Det skal oplyses, at Dan Terkildsen, Lundgrens advokater, på intet tidspunkt har afvist at ville fører klientens påstande om svig mod jyske bank for retten.
Lundgrens advokater har enkelt manipuleret med klientens instrukser, og undgået at svare, givet undvigende svar, og sætter elever til at komme med løbende udskylninger, ganske enkelt for at undgå at svare på klientens spørgsmål.
At advokaten ikke fremlage klients bilag, 28-101 fra 28. December, men istedet usandt oplyste og bekraftede, over for klienten 22. Marts 2019 at alle bilag ville blive medtaget, hvilket eleven på sms bekraftede var aftalt med retten.
“Vi deler samtaler og sms i sagsmatrialer som skal understøtte at tidligere advokater og advokatfuldmægtig fra Lundgrens bevidst har vildledt klienten.”
Som når den fuldmægtige 22 marts 2019 telefonisk bekræftede, at sagen handler om svig og falsk, og så at vidner som Anders Dam og Philip Baruch, med flere skal indkaldes, for så 13. August 2019 at tale Dan Terkildsen efter munden, da Dan siger
“undlader efternavn på elever” Emil har styr på vidnerne ik, Emil bekraftede, og nikkede til Dan, men udspekuleret nævner hverken Dan Terkildsen eller Emil hvilken vidner, vi har besluttet skulle indkaldes.
I oktober da vi får sags materialet i sagen BS 402/2015-VIB og processkrifter 2. Samt B. C. bliver vores værste anelser bekraftede. 2. September 2019 kan vi konstatere at Lundgrens, ikke har fremlagt hvem vores vidner er, men bare har bekraftede dem jyske bank i Mars har oplyst banken ønsket indkaldt.
Vi bliver ligeledes bekræftet i at Lundgrens advokatpartnerselskab, ved den fuldmægtige Emil 22 marts 2019 både på sms og telefonisk har løjet overfor for deres klient, om at Bilag 28-101. var fremlagt.
FAKTA er BILAG 28-101. Er ikke blevet fremlagt, men Emil har i stedet i juli måned fremlagt nogle andre bilag, med andre bilags nummer, disse bilag har Lundgrens fremlagt uden processkrifter, og uden bilags liste, ja de er fremlagt uden at have aftalt det med klienten.
Hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke var advokat for jyske bank, ville klientens påstande og beviser Bilag 28-101 være blevet fremlagt, bilag 98. Var i øvrigt en bilags liste.
Lundgrens tidligre klient, er ret sikker på at at Jyske Banks bestyrelse, har bestukket ders advokat #LUNDGRENS med en million ordre, til at gå i seng med fjenden 🙂 griner altså “#JYSKEBANK”
På trods af klientens ellers meget klare instrukser til LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER, Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie, Emil, har Lundgrens direkte modarbejdet, at deres, klient har fået fremlagt nogle af deres påstande fremlagt, mod jyske bank for blandt andet SVIG, “Bedrageri i en millionsvindel sag” udført ved SVIG OG FALSK.
DR “BEDRAGET 2. ER IKKE LANGT FRA VIRKELIGHEDEN”
Klienten ved ikke at deres advokat mod jyske bank arbejder for, JA selv samme jyske bank
Jyske Banks Svigforretninger som klienten, mener den samlede bestyrelse / koncernledelsen i foreningen står bag, og stadig fortsætter, og det sker for at fortsætte bankens svigagtige optrænder over for jyske banks kunde.
Lundgrens advokat og partner Dan Terkildsen, fortæller 13-08-2019 bestyrelsen, ikke har noget ansvar for det jyske bank, udsætter os for, lige som Dan også siger at der skal fjernes flere af de nu fremlagte bilag “beviser.” Og siger vi skal naturligvis være enige.
Problemet er bare lundgrens Dan Terkildsen har allerede valgt at hjælpe jyske bank, ved at modarbejde vores sag og påstande mod jyske bank bliver fremlagt.
Efter Dan Terkildsen har udtalt, at jyske banks bestyrelse ikke, har noget ansvar, for hvad jyske bank koncernen laver, og altså det svig som koncernen har udsat os kunder for, siger Dan Terkildsen også at han ikke er nogle papegøje, der bare gentager det vi siger, men siger også at han tager hatten af for vores bil reklame, og siger det er godt gået, samtidig med at han griner, hvilket er gratis at sige, i Retten Viborg er det påstande og beviser dommeren skal dømme efter, ikke reklame.
Dette samtidig med at Dan Terkildsen har planlagt at møde 30 september i Viborg byret, uden at have fremlagt nogle af klientens svig og falsk påstande, som ellers er tydeligt skrevet på bilerne, men at Lundgrens advokater også har planlagt, at få fjernet flere af de nu fremlagte bilag lugter mest af bestikkelse.
Lundgrens advokater der tydeligvis har en skjult dagsorden, og forsøger at manipulere med deres klient, for at hjælpe jyske bank, med ikke at ville fremlægge klientens beviser og påstande mod jyske bank for svig, og koncernen ledelsen for medvirkende til fortsat Svig.
Hvis Lundgrens samlede partnere, ingurerrer at Dan Terkildsen har skadet Lundgrens klients sag mod jyske bank, ved ikke at ville fremlægge klientens påstande, mod jyske bank, imens jyske Banks millioner er rullet ind på Lundgrens konto, i form af honorar, for den hjælp Lundgrens advokater har ydet Jyske Bank, og vel stadig yder Jyske Bank, Så lugter det af råddenskab og korruption i det samlede Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab.
Understøtter dette ikke blot, klientens mistanke, om, det er de samlede partnere i LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER, som er sammen, om at skade deres egen klients sag, i mod jyske bank, samtidig med Lundgrens advokater muligvis har brugt klientens svig sag, til at kunne udvide sammen arbejdedet med jyske bank A/S
Trodde ikke at Lundgrens advokater, ville lade sig trække med ind i jyske banks fortsatte svig. Og dirækte er medvirkende, som Nykredit A/S der også i en periode hjalp Jyske Bank, ved at tilbageholde oplysninger om lån 4.328.000 kr. der ikke findes.
Der findes flere som har dækket over at jyske bank laver svig “Bedrageri”, ved at forsøge hjælpe jyske bank, enkelt ved at tilbageholde oplysninger overfor klienten, og at Rødstenen og Lundgrens begge nægtet at fremlægge klientens påstande over for retten, samtidig med at Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater har løjet over for retten.
Dette er råddenskab i store danske advokat huse, som ingen andre klienter før har kunne bevise.
Dan Terkildsen vil nok sige, at Lundgrens ikke har noget ansvar, lige som Morten Ulrik Gade, Birgit Bush Thuesen, og som Philip Baruch skriver JYSKE BANK HAR INGEN ANSVAR.
Det ser ud til at korruption og bestikkelse i Danmark, trives i bedste velgående, at det sker for at skjule store #Danske #bankers Bedrageri / svig forretninger er kun sørgeligt.
Særligt i de store Danske Advokater virksomheder og i Danske banker, syntes korruption og bestikkelse at trives.
Hertil er dato 5. Februar 2018 hvor Lundgrens advokater har fået vores svig sagen mod jyske bank.
Og så oplysningerne om at Lundgrenens advokater i perioden marts til juni 2018, har taget imod opgaven fra jyske bank A/S, om at Lundgrens advokater skulle give jyske bank rådgivning i forbindelse med en handel til omkring 600 million kroner.
DETTE SYNES AT VÆRE ET GODT BUD, PÅ HVORFOR LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER HAR MODARBEJDET VORES SVIG SAG, DER IKKE ER BLEVET FREMLAGT OVERFOR RETTEN.
Sagen mod jyske bank, der er en mindre svindel sag, og bare for nogle millioner, hvor kunde i jyske bank siger at jyske bank udsætter kunden for et fortsat bedrageri.
At Dan Terkildsen på første møde, spørger om vi tror Jyske Bank har lavet alt sammen med vilje, og hverken dengang marts 2018 til her sidst møde 13-08-2019 har ville sige hvad det er som vi påstår, er mærkeligt.
Men efter Klienten har opdaget at Lundgrens advokater, der er ( VAR ) kundens advokat, men som allerede og samtidig har lavet million forretninger for Jyske Bank, og derfor har store økonomiske interesser i at ville arbejde for jyske bank, og vel derfor hjælper jyske bank i mod Lundgrens egen klient..
Lundgrens kan naturligvis ikke fører en Bedrageri “svig” sag imod jyske bank, samtidig med at jyske bank betaler millioner i honorar til Lundgrens for andre opgaver.
Læs om kunden der alene selv, også har måtte kæmpe mod selv sine egne advokater fra Lundgrens og Rødstenen advokater, for at få fremlagt deres påstande, og beviser for at stoppe jyske banks fortsatte million svig, mens politiet og statsadvokaten, har nægtet, at undersøge om der er noget om snakken.
Den Danske stat har på denne måde, faktisk hjulpet jyske bank, ved at nægte efterforskning af Jyske Bank, for dokumentfalsk og bedrageri imod bankens kunde.
Statsadvokaten skriver: At kunden selv må fører sine påstande, mod jyske bank for svig og falsk i civilretten. Her prøvede så både Rødstenen og Lundgrens at få svig og falsk påstanden fjernet, od direkte mod god advokatskik arbejdede Lundgrens og Rødstenen i mod deres klient påstande blev fremlagt.
Read about the client who alone himself, also had to fight even his own lawyers from Lundgren’s and Rødstenen’s lawyers, to present their allegations, and evidence to stop Jyske Bank’s continued million fraud, while the police and the state attorney, have refused to investigate whether there is anything about the talk.
In this way, the Danish state has actually helped Jyske Bank, by refusing to investigate Jyske Bank, for document fraud and fraud against the bank’s customer.
The prosecutor writes: That the client must make his own claims against Jyske Bank for fraud and false in civil law. Here both Rødstenen and Lundgrens tried to have the fraud and false claim removed, or directly against good legal practice, Lundgrens and Rødstenen worked against their client’s allegations.
Det viser sig at være en svær opgave for jyske Banks kunde, at stoppe bankens fortsatte bedrageri, når Jyske Bank syntes at lave aftaler med kundens advokater, om ikke at fremlægge kundens Bedrageri påstand mod jyske bank, og at mindst Lundgrens vælger jyske bank som partner.
It turns out to be a difficult task for Jyske Bank’s client, to stop the bank’s continued fraud when Jyske Bank appeared to make agreements with the client’s lawyers, not to submit the client’s Fraud allegation against Jyske Bank, and that at least Lundgrens chooses Jyske bank as a partner .
Men når kunden nu skifter advokat, til en som jyske Banks bestyrelse ikke har kunne bestikke, med opgaver for Jyske Bank, for at modarbejde sagen mod jyske bank for svig, bliver fremlagt.
Og når jyske Banks koncernledelse, med CEO Anders Dam i spidsen, lader Jyske bank A/S advokater fra, Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater lyve selv overfor domstolen, med det ene formål, at skuffe i retsforhold, således BANKENS SVIG FORRETNINGER kan fortsættes.
På Dansk så at jyske bank fortsat kan udsætte bankens kunder for svig, og dette svig sker åbenlyst med Ledelsens fulde opbakningen.
Hvem mere vil medvirke til at Danske Banker som jyske bank laver Bedrageri
But when the client now switches lawyer, to someone who Jyske Bank’s board has not been able to bribe, with tasks for Jyske Bank, to counteract the case against Jyske Bank for fraud, is presented.
And when Jyske Bank’s group management, with CEO Anders Dam at the forefront, Jyske bank A / S lets lawyers from Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys lie to the court themselves, with the sole purpose of disappointing legal matters, so that the BANK’S FRAUD BUSINESS can be continued.
In Danish, Jyske Bank can continue to expose the bank’s customers to fraud, and this fraud is evident with the full support of Management.
Who else will contribute to Danske Banker as Jyske bank doing Fraud
Lundgrens advokater er grunden til at Jyske Bank stadig kan lave Bedrageri mod kunde.
Det ser sådan ud at LUNDGRENS advokater som skulle fremlægge deres klintetens svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank A/S.
Er enten købt eller bestukket af jyske bank, alene det at jyske bank giver Lundgrens million opgaver, og Lundgrens påtager sig opgaven, samtidig med Lundgrens har vores sag mod jyske bank for “Bedrageri” svig som Lundgrens har ladet os “klienten” tro, ville blive fremlagt af Lundgrens.
Klinten har 20 september 2019 skrevet til Dan Terkildsen at Lundgrens advokater, ligesom Rødstenen advokater, har modarbejdet at vores påstande bliver fremlagt i retten, Dan har ikke kommenteret dette.
Har Lundgrens fået million opgaver af Jyske bank, for at holde vores påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk ude af retten. ?
Man kan næsten ikke tro, vi fortsat skal udsættes for dette her svig, vi har jo bare anmodet jyske bank og ledelsen om at mødes, for at få talt sammen.
It looks like LUNDGRENS lawyers who were supposed to present their client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske bank A / S.
Lundgren’s lawyers are the reason why Jyske Bank can still make fraud against a customer.
Is either bought or ordered by Jyske bank, only that Jyske bank gives Lundgren’s million tasks and Lundgrens takes on the task, while Lundgrens has our case against Jyske bank for “Fraud” fraud which Lundgrens has let us “client” believe, would be presented by Lundgrens.
The client has written to Dan Terkildsen on September 20, 2019 that Lundgren’s lawyers, just like Rødstenen’s lawyers, have countered that our claims are presented in court, Dan has not commented on this.
Har Lundgrens fået million opgaver af Jyske bank, for at holde vores påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk ude af retten. ?
You can hardly believe we should continue to be exposed to this fraud, we just asked Jyske bank and the management to meet, to talk together.
Disse her barnlige og for jyske bank sikkert nogle ganske morsomme indlæg, det er sku da dumt ikke at tale sammen, jyske bank er en anderledes og uredelig bankforretning, hvor det at snyde og bedrage må være fundamentet for Jyske Bank
ANDERS DAM. HUSK SAMTALE FREMMER FORSTÅELSEN.
At jyske bank har købt og betalt vores advokater fra Lundgrens, sådan ser det ihvertfald ud, siden Lundgrens advokater har modarbejdet deres egen klient.
Vores advokat LUNDGRENS i sagen mod jyske bank for SVIG, syntes at vælge at gå i seng med fjenden, og rådgive jyske bank i million sag, frem for at ville fremlægge vores påstande mod banken.
Det må stå klart for både Lundgrens og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, at begge disse advokat virksomheder sammen, bør opdrages af Advokat samfundet, og lære hvad god advokat skik er for noget, og om det ikke også gælder for de advokater som arbejder for de Danske banker.
En finansiel katastrofe, ikke kun for tilliden til de store Danske Banker, men også tilliden til de store Danske Advokat virksomheder, som skulle hjælpe deres klienter, men som istedet hjælper bankerne, med at skjule bankens fortsatte svigforretninger i mod deres kunder.
SKULLE DENNE HER SAG VÆRE ET ENESTÅENDE TILFÆLDE ? NÆPPE.
Jyske bank udsætter os kunder for groft svig, dette opdaterer vi først i 2016, og beder Thomas Schioldan Sørensen fra Rødstenen advokater, om at ændre i vores påstande.
I 2017 må vores advokat Thomas Schioldan Sørensen i sagen stoppe, efter vi tager advokatvirksomheden Rødstenen, i at lyve overfor os, og sikkert også har lavet en aftale med jyske bank, Thomas Schioldan har forsøgt, bag ryggen af klienten at ville hæve sagen mod jyske bank, som af klienten, i 2016 var oplyst ændret til en sag om svig og falsk, hvilket Thomas Schioldan stik i mod klientens anmodninger, ikke har ville fremlægge for retten.
Da Storbjerg Erhverv herefter må søge efter anden advokat, spørges bla. en advokat, der er bestyrelses formand for en stor advokatvirksomhed, om hjælp men må afvise at hjælpe, da de har hjulpet jyske bank i en sag med BRF KREDIT.
I marts 2018 bliver vi af en tidligere bank diriktør, anbefalet Lundgrens advokater, mere bestemt Dan Terkildsen.
Dan Terkildsen bliver oplyst, om de andre advokater, vi har talt med, men som ikke har kunne tage sagen, Dan bliver fremlagt at sagen mod jyske bank er en svig og falsk sag, og Dan Terkeldsen siger at han ingen problemer har med at føre sagen mod jyske bank for svig. “Bedrageri” Lundgrenens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, tiltræder omkring febuar 2018.
Her efter har vi ikke kunne få Lundgrens advokater, til at fremlægge nogle af vores påstande, og har ikke kunne få svar på noget af det vi har skrevet.
I dag 21. September 2019 googlede vi så ordene “Lundgrens Jyske Bank” det gav indblik i hvordan Lundgrens advokater i juni 2018, på deres hjemmeside, har fremlagt at have hjulpet Jyske Bank med en handel for et tre cifret million beløb.
HVORDAN LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER KAN HJÆLPE JYSKE BANK MED EN SAG FOR FLERE HUNDREDE MILLIONER
OG SAMTIDIG HAR KUNNE LADE OS, KLIENTEN TRO AT LUNDGRENS SAMTIDIG, HAR FØRT VORES SAG MOD JYSKE BANK FOR SVIG OG FALSK. “BEDRAGERI OG DOKUMENTFALSK” DET LIGGER OVER VORES FANTASI. klik på teksten, og følg linket nedenunder.
Danmarks nok mægtigste bankmand CEO Anders Christian Dam, står fast, og nægter at svare bankens kunder, og dermed, har også koncernenledelsen tilbage holdt vigtige oplysninger, om det af Jyske Banks påstået lån på 4.328.000 kr. er optaget i Nykredit og derefter påstået omlagt, som jyske bank har fremlagt det overfor retten.
Den samlede Jyske Bank koncernenledelse, har mindst siden 19. Maj 2016 harft viden om bankens svindel, mod jyske banks egen kunde, hvor ledelsen kunne have være skrede ind, og undersøgt sagen, samt stoppe Jyske Banks fortsatte svig imod jyske banks kunder, men dette har ingen i jyske bank koncernen ønsket.
Koncernenledelsen, nægtede istedet, at bekrafte eller afkræfte hvorvidt, kunden har optaget / hjemtaget det underliggende lån i Nykredit, som banken og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, har påstået overfor retten.
Og siden maj 2016 har koncernen nægtet, og nægter stadig at stoppe jyske banks million svindel, og udnyttelse af bankens små kunder, hvorfor kunden i september 2019 gennem 43 måneder, stadig kæmper, for at få deres påstand om Jyske Banks SVIG FORRETNINGER fremlagt overfor Domstolen.
Koncern diriktør Anders Christian Dam, har flere gange siden 19 maj 2016 kunne vælge selv, og helt personligt, at kunne have stoppe Jyske Banks million svindel, imod bankens egen kund.
Men Anders Dam vælger sammen med den øvrige ledelse, ikke at stoppe svindlen, der samtidig ville have afsløret advokatvirksomheden Lund Elmer Sandager for medvirkende, i at skjule Jyske Banks bedrageri “svig” mod kunde i jyske bank, hvor Philip Baruch for jyske Bank, flere gange har løjet overfor retten.
Philip Baruch der også bestyrelsesmedlem i jyske bank, har mindst haft et møde 02-11-2018 med Lundgrens advokater, Dan Terkeldsen, som er vores advokat i sagen mod jyske banks svigforretninger.
Efterfølgende har Lundgrens advokater modarbejdet og dirækte imod klientens instruks, ikke ville fremlægge nogle af klientens påstande, som Svig og Falsk overfor for retten.
Svig og falsk hvilket både Rødstenen advokater sammen med Lundgrens advokater, begge har modsat sig bliver fremlagt, klientens Advokater har nu i samlet 43 måneder direkte modarbejdet at klientens påstande er blivet fremlagt.
Jyske Banks bestyrelse ved alle sammen udemærket, at jyske bank realt kynisk udsætter os kunder, os for et fortsat bedrageri, og dette udføres ved hjælp af dokumentfalsk, og ved at Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, flere gange i sagen, har løjet overfor retten, hvilket kunden har oplyst til retten.
Mens bankens mægtige ledelse, klammer sig fast til deres bestyrelses poster, og million indtægter, udsætter jyske bank os kunder, helt bevidst for Bedrageri.
Hvilket kunden bad deres advokater, først Thomas Schioldan Sørensen fra Rødstenen i 2016 og 2017
Og så Dan Terkeldsen fra Lundgrens advokater i 2018 og 2019 om at fremlægge som SVIG & FALSK.
HVILKET BÅDE RØDSTENEN ADVOKATER, SAMT LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER. I 43 MÅNEDER HAR NÆGTET AT FREMLÆGGE OVER FOR RETTEN.
Tænker at koncernenledelsen i jyske bank satser på politiet også efter en hovedforhandlingen, som nok kun kan forhalles frem til 2020.
Hvor beviserne for jyske Banks mange forskellige forhold af lov overtrædelser, er fremlagt, og vil blive fuldt op af et nyt processkift, og påstands dokument.
Som vi nu, sansynligvis, må have en ny og tredje advokat, til at fremlægge, eftersom både Rødstenen og Lundgrens advokater syntes ligge i ske med jyske bank, samtidig med at have forgivet, at være klientens advokat, med det formål at dregne klienten for penge og energi, dette er hvad klienten føler.
Men det kommer ikke til at ske, nu bliver kunden bare rigtig godt gal.
Alt imens Lundgrens advokater tilsyneladende, fortsat vil dække over Jyske Banks bestyrelsesmedlemmer, har medvirket til at bankens kunde stadig i jyske bank, gennem nu 11 år udsættes for endog groft svig.
Kunden i jyske bank er ret sikker på, at den samlede bestyrelse i jyske bank, står sammen i forening, om at Jyske Bank fortsætter med at udsætte kunde for svig, i håb om kunden ikke kan få råd til en advokat, der kan stoppe jyske banks fortsatte svigforretninger imod bankens kunder.
For jyske bank koncernen & koncernenledelsen, handler det om økonomisk at udmattet kunden, som banken forsat udsætter for “SVIG” Bedrageri.
Her har vi en stor Dansk Bank der er helt uden nogen form for moral, uden etik lader deres kunder udsætte for Bedrageri, det vi fremføre som GROFT UDNYTTELSE VED SVIG OG FALSK.
Click and read that we inform the court about in letters January 3 and January 25, 2018 August 2, and corrected 2019 And as an example to our attorney November 4, 2018. Citing the letter Jan 3, 2018
As the court writes November 13, 2018, Seen in the light of what we have written and presented, and immediately after November 13, write and inform our lawyer. That everything that we have presented to the court, must be retained Believes that by the letter 03-08-2019 and sent information, to the court that the case, still is a fraud and false case.
And we as in letters to the court from 3 and 25 January 2018. Still accusing “Jyske Bank” Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys for lying to the court. We are still expecting, the court to investigate, this charge against the attorneys, whether board member Philip Baruch has lied, or provided any information to the court that is false. So, if some lawyers and the court, by the letter of November 13, 2018, succeeded in removing our sent letters of January 3 and 25, 2018 Then must the letters be into the chase BS 1-698/2015 again. Or is it possible to misunderstand what we highlight is the case Lying in legal relationships, fraud and fake
The case also contains the claim that there is no loan, but Jyske bank has made fraud, to make the customer believe this existed and that the customer has rescheduled this loan. This is easily proved by Appendix 30. D and Appendix 28.
No one can want to prohibit a customer, from presenting to the court that this is fraud. and then the sanity has only grown, as the board has covered the scam, though several attorneys have helped cover up the fraud.
AND SO WE WRITE IN THE COURT OF AUGUST 3, 2019
THIS IS NOT FUN BUT JUST BECAUSE THE GROUP’S MANAGEMENT SEEMS, THIS IS SO FUCKING FUN. WE SEE IT IS SORRY, FOR THOSE WHO TRUST ON DANISH BANKS. Since 2008, Jyske Bank has exposed a small customer to fraud The customer discovers that Jyske Bank is making fraud in 2016. And here, tells Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers, and the management of Jyske bank about it. THE ANSWER IS NOT AVAILABLE And we have not received much help towards the bank, what we have received, we have paid dearly for. But we hold on, in our claims, and Anders Dam asks the Court to adjudicate on the case. Anders Dam, REMEMBER Just because Jyske Bank can deceive, does not mean you have to deceive your customers. Here is a very brief part of the case we have asked our lawyers to submit to Jyske Bank Let the evidence speak for itself. Are we dealing with a criminal organization? When this mighty bank, in every way, has thwarted the investigation and investigation of the case Misled and disposed of documents, remember a thief even, if it is a bank well, can be discovered. Main hearing starts September 30, 2019 BS 1-698 / 2015 at 9.00 Viborg Remember that the bank is not convicted but what does the evidence say
Here, Philip Baruch of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors will fight to win over the client who just will not give up the talented lawyers of Jyske bank
We have asked our lawyer to go after you for lying in court
It will now be nice to be able to get a verdict in the case, and hopefully get the fraud stopped after 11 years.
The battle between the top management in Jyske Bank and Storbjerg Erhverv Will be led by CEO Anders Dam who for the combined group as well as the equally experienced Lawyer Philip Baruch, who believes that Jyske Bank is an honest and honorable bank that complies with all laws and regulations. And therefore take the matter with serenity The mighty bank Jyske bank, is expected in court to do everything they can to fight their customer Storbjerg Erhverv. Because in Jyske bank it’s all about winning, it’s not about running a reputable banking business. The client does not care regardless of their own lawyer, has not confirmed that Jyske bank is suing them for fraud. So that is our view, and we will present that too.
Jyske bank thought it was easy to cheat and deceive a sick customer But apparently made horrible mistakes. Therefore, these witnesses from Jyske Bank, are repeatedly requested to call.
Anders Dam why don’t you want to talk to us. What have we done since you, along with the rest of your army, deceived us? You can offer us a meeting and explain to us what we have done in Jutland since refusing to make up Jutlandic honor. Anders Dam we are right, neither you nor anyone else on the board should be a member of the board, but immediately set your mandate free. But we are wrong, so help us understand the law, since we are obviously not as smart as you Anders Dam We want to give you our hand, but you have to receive it. And then will we apologize for teasing you, in this little fight, but what to do when it’s the mouse against the elephant and the elephant just steps on one. ANDERS NUMMERET ER 22227713 RING
WE HAVE TRIED AND TRIED TO RETURN HANDS BUT JYSKE BANK REFUSES ANY FORM FOR DIALOGUE THEREFORE, THIS STOCK IS TO FIND ON BANKNYT DK
Since May 2016, have the customer, been trying to shout up the total Group management in Jyske Bank unsuccessfully. Therefore some cars are driving around with these, free advertising for jyske bank A/S Denmark. Thes advertising is to show that this danish bank, is totally indifferent that the bank's customer is being exposed to fraud by the jyske bank / CUSTOMER IS ONLY TRYING TO GET INTO DIALOGUE WHICH BANK HAVE REFUSED SINCE 2016 And instead the bank continues, what the customer calls, gross exploitation of the bank's power, to continue the fraud, which even the Danish police refuse to investigate. The customer has for over 3 years. yell up like here. Just to get the Danish bank jyske bank, to stop the bank crafty and very gross, fraud against the bank's small customer. It has been impossible to enter into dialogue with the bank's management in order to talk about the bank's fraud so that this could be stopped. / The Bank Board Member Philip Baruch wrote, May 31, 2016 This was after the customer's first direct contact the bank's executive chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam. May 19, 2016 and May 25, 2016. "just 2 of a lot of inquiries, which the bank May 31, 2016 writes they do not want to receive." The customer wrote 18, may 2016, and directly asked the bank's corporate management Appendix 66. "That the customer meant to be exposed to a huge fraud" / And asks for proof May 25, 2016 Appendix 68 That the customer has taken out the underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, which was otherwise offered on 20 May 2008. Appendix Y. Appendix 82 Here we ask the bank employee, on April 21, 2016 to prove that the alleged loan of DKK 4,328,000 is repayable and rescheduled, as alleged Appendix D. But get no answers we have many times in the past tried to get some attention, but this the bank refused to give us. November 17, 2015 Appendix 90. / We fight against dishonesty in this big Danish bank, apparently living by lying to their customers. Should we really be the only one who are exposed to such fraud in this Danish bank Join the court September 30 and October 1, 2019 both days at. 9 am in court viborg The case BS 1-698/2015 Is about fraud and fake which we ourselves have had to present to the court December 28, 2018 Appendix 100. and 101. with Annexes 28 to 101 presented / / FACTUAL INFORMATION IS & AND CLAIM'S CLAIM For an alleged interest rate swap Appendix 1. date August 16, 2008 IS NOT IT CUSTOMER APPROVED FROM AUGUST 15, 2008. AND THE CLAIMED BORROWING LOAN OF DKK 4,328,000 AS OFFERED ANNEX Y. DOES NOT EXIST WHEN THE BIG DANISH BANK WRITTEN FEBRUARY 19, 2010. That the customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000 And swapped this loan with Jyske bank. Appendix 30. WHICH IS SHORT AFTER CUSTOMER NOVEMBER 26, 2009. BECOME VERY SICK. AFTER A BRAIN BLEEDING. AND THEN WERE SICK FOR SEVERAL YEARS AFTER See Appendix 93. 94. 95. 96. 97 Our lawyer, believed that these appendices could harm our case by presenting them, but we believe these appendices precisely prove that Jyske bank, in bad faith, has cynically exploited a very ill customer, to make more money. WHEN JYSKE BANK CLAIMS IN THEIR PROPOSED ANNEXES D. date 10 SEPTEMBER 2015. TO LOAN ON. DKK 4,328,000 DKK has been rescheduled. IT WOULD BE LYING ABOUT THE COURT, IF NO LOAN IS FOUND RESCHEDULED. AS CLAIMED Appendix D. / As the customer allegations have still not been submitted in the closing plea of December 18, 2018 And as the bank December 28, 2018, it continues what the customer in his claim holds is fraud. Choose the Customer himself to present their allegations, which is in testimony to the court, by Appendix 100 and Appendix 101 on December 28, 2018. / Information / Evidence, around the interest rate swap That Annex E.5 of DKK 4,328,000 as of August 15, 2008, the approved swap for the Offer is Appendix Y. THE SWAP IS ONLY if the customer, chooses to take the offered loan of the 4,328,000. DKK date 20 May 2008 Annex Y. Regardless, Jyske Bank itself chooses August 16, 2008 Self choose to make to make an new and number 2, interest rate swap. So that between August 16, 2008 and December 30, 2008, there are a full 2 interest rate swaps for a loan offer. Appendix Y. DKK 4,328,000 which the customer asks Jyske Bank to prove. WHAT THE BANK REFUSES. / ANNEX 30 and ANNEX D. WHEN JYSKE BANK CLAIMS TO THE COURT HAVE BORROWED 4.328.000 AND SUBSEQUENTLY CHANGED THE LOAN That the customer had borrowed DKK 4,328,000 and this was exchanged with Jyske bank, by swapping interest Appendix 1. So the bank must not lie to make more money / which Jyske bank claims the customer has repatriated, and then switched, to another loan in Nykredit. The customer asks both the bank's lawyers and the bank's employees, before The customer again asks the management, to prove that the customer has made 2 swaps for this alleged underlying loan, in the large Danish Bank Nykredit As the group has claimed in the case, since it was opened in 2013. in the Banking Institutions Board chase328/2013 Where the bank in Appendix 2. 3. and 4. on page 5. item 17. writes. that if the customer complains about the bank it must happen there. Jyske bank requests that the case be rejected, as the customer is a company / Note on page 1. of the 3 Appendices, all of which are addressed to a company So the bank is misleading their customers, right from the start "before the customer knows that they are subject to gross fraud" to complain about where the bank will reject the case, and hope to be able to make the case outdated. / But even though Jyske bank In an email from Appendix 30. dated February 19, 2010 claims the customer has borrowed the 4,328,000 And in another mail. Appendix D. dated January 9, 2012. "presented by Jyske Bank September 10, 2015. / When the Jyskebank claims 10 september 2015 that the underlying loan, has been rescheduled The customer claims and submits that Jyske Bank bank is lying to the court. / It's been uphill, just to get Nykredit bank to tell the truth when we ask Nykredit Bank if we have borrowed 4,328,000 and whether we have changed this loan, and when it should have changed But just like Jyske bank, Nykredit chooses not to answer, that's why we sue Nykredit bank since they have to tell us, about has we borrowed 4,328,000 in Nykredit as Jyske Bank has claimed. This was very strange for Nykredit to answer. But then we got a meeting with the bank. And Nykredit's lawyer Mette Egholm Nielsen also very clearly told, that Nykredit would not deliver a shoot against Jyske bank. After a week we manage to get Nykredit confirmed that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit See Appendix 28. from October 18, 2016 JYSKE BANK LYING, AND JYSKE BANK LYING FOR THE COURT.
The Bank Board Member Philip Baruch wrote, May 31, 2016
This was after the customer’s first direct contact the bank’s executive chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam May 19, 2016
And May 25, 2016. Where the customer wrote and directly asked the bank’s corporate management to prove.
That the customer has taken out the underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit which Jyske bank claims the customer has repatriated, and then switched, to another loan in Nykredit
A case that the Danish state. FSA knows very well. But choose NOT to interfere And leds the Danish bank, Jyske bank, continue the fraud. And lets let it be up to the little customer, in civil court self to stop the fraudulent bank’s fraud. REMEMBER THIS Call IS ONLY A CALL FOR THE DANISH BANKS NOT TO LIE. And not to cheat their customers. AND JYSKE BANK GROUP MANAGEMENT PLEASE TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS. AND PLEASE DO NOT TAKE YOUR HAND IN OTHERS COOKIES.
A case that the Danish state knows very well But choose to let the Danish bank Jyske bank continue the scam. Oh let it be up to the little customer even in court, to stop the fraudulent bank's fraud. REMEMBER THIS IS ONLY A CALL, FOR THE DANISH BANKS TO NOT LIE AND SO TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS. SO PLEASE TELL THEM WHEN THEY ARE GETTING HANDED IN OTHERS COOKIES
Here you can read our claims, against Jyske Bank and Group Management, for rough fraud Which was presented to our lawyer on 6 December 2018 The 40 pages are a little down the page. BANKNYT
This case is about the credibility of Jyske Bank
SEE CLAIMS as we in Danish can best explain
HERE ARE THE APPLICATIONS SUPPLIED BY THE COURT TO THE COURT 28-12-2018 FOR A KNOWLEDGE EXPLANATION ANNEXES 100 and 101 28-12-2018
30-09-2019 and 01-10-2019 Main negotiation starts both days at. 9.00
Jyske bank We will see you on September 30 in Viborg. Hope you not will be able to continue your fraud. In which case we can one be sure that we have a rule of law here in Denmark. Anders Dam now read what we wrote to the group 20-06-2019 again.
The case here is not about money laundering, That Den Danske Bank and Nordea have made. But it's about simple fraud against the bank customer, by lying even to court. For In Denmark, no one is shaking his head, when the banks are making scams. It's just about money, no matter how it is obtained Here, a customer in Jyske Bank has been exposed to fraud for 11 years. and in this case the group's management has known about the fraud at least since May 2016 Follow the case in Viborg courtroom 30-09-2019 case number BS 1-698 / 2015