We refer to the SMSs in the letter, with allegations sent to Emil, but which none of Lundgren’s attorneys would provide. In the letter, the client refers to SMS 23-08-2019. and writes that Emil from Lundgrens has not responded to their client’s SMS / And also refers to Mette-Marie in Lundgrens.
Which in turn raised our allegations 10-12-2018, to present the client’s claims to the court 18-12-2018. –
IT IS A FACT. That Mette-Marie chooses with Dan Terkildsen, not to submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank, in the closing petition 18-12-2018 There Mette-Marie is doing the same thing on December 18 and will be sent to court.
/ IT IS A FACT That Lundgren’s attorneys 02/09/2019 make and present litigation 2, exactly 4 weeks before the scheduled hearing 30 September In this document, Lundgrens also did not include any of the client’s fraud claims. Just as it is a fact that Emil does not share Process Letter 2 with the client who first gets a copy, after Lundgrens has been fired, on suspicion that Lundgren’s lawyers are corrupt. –
The main claim is still Appendix 1. a change of interest from 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000. for an underlying loan that does NOT exist. That Annex 1 is false is said 1,000 times. Just this little detail, Lundgren’s lawyers fail to present to the court.
IT IS A FACT That Lundgrens, by Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie and Emil, repeatedly stated that the SWAPPEN of 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. by the client is alleged to be false. When Lundgren’s attorneys present the case, as if Appendix 1. is agreed and approved. Then, directly directly against the client’s instructions, bring the case as a case of bad advice, against the client’s claims. Then it must be Lundgrens and Jyske Bank who must have agreed this. –
And why doesn’t Lundgrens send the client a copy of litigation 2. Clear that the client thinks that Jyske Bank must have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, in order not to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank Whether it is Bribery that happened by the Return Commission, or in a fee, hidden in some way, the parties to Lundgren’s lawyers must be able to explain. Like when Jyske Bank hires Lundgrens for a large million tasks.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW IF LUNDGREN’S ADVOCATES HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED? SO YOU MUST ASK LUNDGRENS LAWYER’S AND JYSKE BANK’S MANAGEMENT
If you have read this petition with our allegations against Jyske bank for million fraud, even though we cannot spell, you would then be able to misunderstand our claims.
Here is what Lundgrens has presented 02-09-2019 NOT A WORD ABOUT FRAUD, nor an explanation for ANNEX 165, 02-09-2019. there is a replacement for Appendices 100 and 101. from 28-12-2018
And remember witnesses, Did Lundgrens knowingly forget these ,? against Jyske bank paying a bribe in the form of a return commission
But the Lundgrens and Jyske Bank Group must have agreed otherwise
SEE what Lundgren’s submission to court 02-09-2019 and that without sharing with the client.
Note this here 02-09-2019 is a petition made by Lundgrens, for Lundgrens and Jyske Bank alone, it has nothing to do with what the client writes, but that Jyske bank has bought Lundgrens, the client only discovers 20-09-2019
You also get exactly what Lundgrens has presented 28-09-2018. and 18-12-2018 NONE OF IT CONTAINS CLAIM’S CLAIM
Appendix 18 is informed the court 28-12-2018 is addressed to Appendix 29 Appendix 19 is addressed the court 28-12-2018 is addressed to Appendix 30 as our attorneys forgot the court’s disclosure of 13-11-2018 why we corrected the litigation, while we presents our case 28-12 FAITH VI, Lundgrens got done so they disappeared, so we had to have them presented again
Lundgren’s lawyers got fraud and false case, against Jutland bank February 5, 2018.
A case against Jyske bank for million fraud.
Partner Dan Terkildsen has said he “Lundgrens” had no problem in bringing a case against Jyske Bank, which in Danish is about Million fraud in Denmark. On September 21, 2019,
the Client discovers that Lundgren’s attorneys June 21, 2018 on the attorney’s website. Has stated that he has given Jyske bank advice, in connection with a property sale, for a three-digit million amount.
The question now is: did Lundgren’s lawyers get this job, to counteract their little client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank. And to keep allegations against Jyske Bank for million fraud away from court.
Dan Terkildsen has an unanswered question. How long have Lundgren’s lawyers worked for Jyske Bank.
Har oplyst at have givet jyske bank rådgivning, i forbindelse med et ejendomssalg, for et trecifret millionbeløb. Spørgsmålet er nu: Fik Lundgrens advokater denne opgave, for at modarbejde deres lille klients svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank. Og for at holde påstande mod jyske bank for million svig væk fra retten. Dan Terkildsen har et ubesvaret spørgsmål liggende. Hvor længe har Lundgrens advokater arbejdet for Jyske Bank.
And the management of Jyske Bank should not say that since May 2016, Jyske bank allowed their customers to be exposed to deliberate fraud
LUNDGREN’s lawyers were fired on strong suspicion of having received bribes, if the Board of Lundgrens wants to explain, then we share their answer.
ISSUES ARE
Why does Lundgrens by Partner Dan Terkilsdsen not make our claims against Jyske Bank, in case Lundgrens has not been charged for not presenting the client’s claims.
Then there must be some in Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank who do not know Danish law, Dan Terkildsen could not do a course, about good legal practice and to run a reputable business.
So Lundgrens counteracts their client
Lundgrens has taken a job for Jyske bank
Lundgrens has chosen not to help their client against Jyske Bank, but instead chose to help Jyske Bank against their customer.
That Lundgrens sent a bill of DKK 185,000 to present these 9 pages,
without submitting the client’s claims Have probably been to dry their client for funds.
THIS IS A SCAM
That’s why Lundgrens gets fired Do Lundgrens and Jyske Bank and Lund Elmer Sandager believe that they are kings of Denmark or not to comply with Danish law.
REMEMBER WE DON’T WANT THIS HERE, WE WANT DIALOGUE. THEREFORE CALL US +4522227713
