Read a true story about how large Danish banks like here Jyske Bank cooperate with several lawyers,
And have withheld the applicant’s claims were presented to the court, to disappoint in legal matters.
The plaintiff is very likely to have hired a corrupt law firm.
That works for the bank, that exposes the plaintiff to fraud.
Do you want to help us understand if the Danish bank Jyske Bank is directly criminal.
Or we are crazy.
Here on the Banknyt dk comes the Danish translation of banking news
Welcome to banking news. English version
A case for SØIK
About special economic crime.
We know nothing about Bribery, Fraud, Documentary False, Mandate Fraud, or whether lying to the court in a legal relationship is illegal or legal, but that suggests it is perfectly legal, otherwise the police would intervene.
And here our allegations 28-10-2019 are presented against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud. “Deceitful”
If you have a fraud or false case against you yourself, and if the plaintiff uses Lundgren’s attorneys.
That we ourselves used against Jyske Bank A/S.
Then ask Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
What it will cost if Lundgrens if the doe not present plaintiff’s claims against you.
Maybe Lundgren’s lawyer already has a price list.
We are a large office, I do not know if there are other lawyers working for the defendant said partner Dan Terkildsen 13-08-2019
It’s just fun.
But didn’t Dan Terkildsen think it’s funny ?
The Board of Lundgrens may have more control over what services, Lundgren’s lawyers offer. Corruption, Return Commission, Bribery, does not stand as an offer on Lundgren’s website, is this something the lawyer offers?
As with hardware stores, ask for what you can’t find on the shelves.
We do not know the price Lundgrens got, maybe it was just a friend service.
That Lundgren’s lawyers did what they could, to disappoint in legal matters, by not submitting our allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for false and fraud in court.
But then hope for Lundgren’s lawyers, that they have been well paid, for not presenting our claims in court.
Or else has Jyske Bank scamed Lundgrens lawyers.
Welcome DANISH translation on BANKNYT dk
We share here the letters to Lundgren’s lawyers, explaining why the law firm is corrupt and therefore being fired 24-09-2019, as a result of incompetence, and Lundgren’s million working together with Jyske Bank’s group management.
Then you can see for yourself, that Lundgrens dishonestly, against all good lawyer custom, deliberately and dishonestly counteracted their client’s case, a million-fraud case (false) against Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank A/S.
Which never became presented to the courts by Lundgrens lawyers.
The client had to present their allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and false 28-10-2019.
by them themselves, you can guess why Lundgren’s direct and since February 2018 has counteracted that the client’s case against Jyske Bank A/S was not never been presented the court.
Quite simply, Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors is struggling, to get the case against Jyske Bank for multiple fraud and fraudulent conditions out of date, in order to continue raising interest rates of the DKK 4,328,000
Of the interest swap, which Jyske Bank A/S started on 30-12-2008.
Jyske bank A/S with the CEO Anders Dam and direction in the lead, is struggling against the customers, to pay interest on a loan of DKK 4,328,000.
A loan as the bank has submitted, in legal proceedings as recorded in Nykredit, as the underlying loan, to the SWAP of DKK 4,328,000 which Jyske Bank A/S
made by Jyske bank business branch Vesterbrogade 9 and the date it is made 16-07-2008.
it is a fact. Jyske Bank has been active, in legal matters since 2013, providing more false information, lied to the court untrue and dishonest, and it has been imperative for Lund Elmer Sandager Philip Baruch to withhold the truth in court.
False has submitted, that the Swap made by Jyske Bank 16-07-2008 is the Swap, made by Jyske Bank 15-07-2008. At the same time, Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has withheld information that the Swap customer approved with Jyske Bank on 15-07-2008, which was only agreed if the customer chose to repay the loan offered of NIS 4,328,000 in Nykredit as Swappen of NIS 4,328,000 from 15-07-2008 had been agreed for.
Even though the swap customer approved on 15-07-2008 and which closes on 30-12-2008, Jyske bank makes itself, and without agreement with the customer, an extra interest rate swap the same period, without informing or obtaining permission from the customer, there are facts
Also therefore, since February 5, 2018, we have continuously presented the case to Lundgren’s lawyer partner company that the swap from 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. is false.
You can always go to banknyt dk, where several letters have been shared to Lundgrens lawyers.
Lundgrens lawyers writes to the court 02-09-2019
That the customer ”the plaintiff” has entered into an agreement “with the defendant “ on the case’s Appendix 1. from 16-07-2008
Even though the customer repeatedly, writes that appendix 1. it is false, and this is an allegation that Lundgrens lawyers must present to the court.
Retained information that the Swap of 15-07-2008 has been closed 30-12-2008.
Dishonest and untrue.
Submits that customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000 and has rescheduled this loan.
Jyske Bank A/S has done much else, that is clearly described in the Criminal Code. As punishable offenses.
Jyske Bank Group management wants the customer to pay Jyske Bank the approx. DKK 2,500,000 in interest.
For a loan that does not exist, but which Jyske Bank has lied about existed, to make more money for their shareholders, one must assume.
For the loan of DKK 4,328,000 which the customer
A: has not taken.
B: Have not rescheduled.
And this because Jyske Bank’s many contributors have for years lied, to the customer who was ill after a brain haemorrhage for about 5 years.
The client only in 2016 finds that Jyske Bank A/S is lying, after the board member Philip Baruch 10-09-2015 presented the swap from 15-07-2008 along with several other appendices.
Several of the annexes have been manipulated, as the annual report from 2008.
Annexes O. Here it turns out that Jyske Bank A/S has removed the agreement Annexes E. page 4 and 5. from 15-07-2008 which the customer approved with Jyske Bank 15-07-2008, for the project and offer the client subsequently cashed.
as Lundgren’s client during the period February 5, 2018. to September 1, 2019. This and much more, the client has continually presented to Lundgren’s attorneys with instructions to present to the court
02-09-2019 you can then see if Lundgrens has submitted some of their client’s claims to the court
The story “One of the true ones” starts in 2008/2009 In 2013, against Jyske Bank for bad advice in banking institute appeals board case no. 328/2013.
In 2015, the case continues in court, now BS-402/2015-VIB. Where the Client has had to make and present their claims against Jyske Bank A/S. Their lawyers Lundgren’s lawyer partner company turned out to be corrupt, and did not take care of their client’s interests, but in secret has taken care of Jyske Bank’s interests.
And that the client then discovered 21-09-2019, after Partner in the grove Dan Terkildsen at a meeting 13-08-2019 says that he does not know if there are others in the office working for Jyske bank, and smiling says it is a big office after all.
The client suspects that Lundgren’s lawyers are dishonest.
And 20-09-2019 Asking the client Lundgren’s partner Dan Terkildsen to answer 2 questions
About Lundgrens works for Jyske Bank
And if yes
How long has Lundgrens worked for Jyske Bank A/S
Lawyer Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren choose not to answer the client.
Which you can read in the shared letters, where there are repeated calls, for copies of court books and more.
The client finds on 21-09-2019 proof that Lundgrens has advised Jyske Bank group on a sale for 600,000,000 dkk. which Lundgrens has hidden from their client. What else has Lundgrens hidden from their client. as their client does not respond the client reasons, why Lundgrens is fired 25-09-2019
which is also shared on banknews dk. “BANKNYT dk.”
In 2016, we discover that Jyske Bank A/S has made several cases of Mandate fraud, Document fraud and Fraud.
The customer in Jyske Bank tries in various ways to make the Group aware that Jyske Bank is just deceiving them.
The Group Board of Directors, CEO Anders Christian Dam, refuses dialogue, and the management will not stop the bank’s continued fraudulent business against the bank’s customer.
The customer tries in a different and fun way, to get in touch with the board.
And at the start this new transgressive way, the customer chooses in November 2016. to try open the bank’s eyes and initial dialogue.
In 2016 we did not think that the car still, here 4 years after, was to be a picture of Jyske Bank’s foundation.
No, it’s not fun anymore.
The management of Jyske Bank now stop exposing us to Fraud, and talk to us, this is not funny.
If we ourselves are guilty of exposing ourselves to fraud, then help us understand.
Or at least meet us and let us see the appendices together.
If Jyske Bank’s board of directors at Danish, would explain, that the bank did nothing wrong, while we look at the appendices together.
Of course, we then erased these gross allegations against Jyske Bank Group A/S and against Jyske Bank’s entire Board of Directors, and lastly against Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys.
But Jyske Bank’s board just laughs.
There are from February 2016 and the next 43 months until 24-09-2019 where during the period we have had 2. Attorneys.
Redstone Attorneys by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen. “Rødstenen.”
Lundgren’s lawyer partner company by partner Dan Terkildsen.
Both have had to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank for fraud and false, but probably of financial interests with Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, chosen to counteract the client’s financial interests.
The client has hired a new and independent lawyer to help stop Jyske Bank’s fraud business, which the Client himself has had to present to the court 28-10-2019.
But look here just 1 mail from September 1, 2019.
Where the Client again gives Lundgren’s lawyers instructions, to present their allegations and to write their 9. witnesses to court.
And hold it against it as Lundgren’s attorneys Submit September 2, 2019.
Where Lundgren’s attorneys dit not present any of the client’s allegations, and have removed 7. of the client’s 9 witnesses.
If Lundgren’s lawyers are not corrupt, then have been bribed by Jyske Bank’s board, not to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank.
So please Jyske Bank and Lundgrens
As always, we can be contacted
Lundgren’s attorneys must be visually impaired, and more word blind than their client.
Or even if Jyske Bank A/S paid Lundgrens many millions dkk, hidden as return commission, to help cover Jyske Bank’s A/S fraud and false, against the bank’s customer, and disappoint in residual conditions.
See more letters at Banknyt dk
Unfortunately, Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, cannot even see that Lundgrens has done anything wrong.
Can you ?, please share
And partner Dan Terkildsen from Lundgrens, has written that Lundgrens, can advise Jyske Bank A/S with a million agreement very well, and at the same time our case against Jyske Bank A/S.
But as you can see from a few letters, it does not at least appear as if Lundgren’s lawyers have presented some of our allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.
However, it is due to bribery, if Jyske Bank A/S Group by provided work in the form of return commission.
What exactly was Lundgren’s submission to the court, and what was Lundgren employed to present to the court?
Bribery in Denmark appeared to be a means of payment for our case not being presented by Lundgren’s Attorneys.
Nobody in Denmark has publicly wanted to comment on the little man’s fight without weapons against a whole and well-equipped army
In other words, that Jyske Bank A/S, in contravention of the provisions of the Criminal Code, has cynically bribed Lundgren’s lawyers Partner Company, not to present any of their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.
Do you want to help us in the fight against criminal banks, when now the police will not interfere, we have, as you can read, also had problems with corrupt law firms.
So that’s why we ask you to help us.
Also like to look at the facts.
5479 – 4563376 Nykredit
Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.
PLEASE HELP US
When Jyske Bank even writes on the catfish. and promises that a judge will probably look at the evidence, and in the end, the law is fortunately furnished.
The fact that Jyske Bank’s group is responsible for hiring Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, who are also the plaintiff’s attorneys, and as you can see here, Lundgren’s Attorneys, after being employed by Jyske Bank’s Group, do not submit any of their client’s claims, removing 7 of the Client’s witnesses, and that without informing the plaintiff anything about this, and Lundgren’s attorneys choose that their client may also not receive a copy of Prosecution 2. from September 2, 2019.
You can on 2 annexes, 1 and 2 September 2019.
By self-examination you find that Lundgren’s lawyers, completely consciously and in bad faith, directly against the client’s instructions, do the exact opposite of what the client repeated since February 2018. Lundgrens has to present in the district court.
But read the page and ask if you have any questions on 004522227713
And please inform Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors that we want dialogue.
And ask the Jyske Bank Group management to take responsibility.
I would like to apologize for being dyslexic and rather bad for spelling.
Which may also be the reason why Lundgren’s lawyer partner company has presented the opposite of what we have asked for.
Thanks for reading.
PS what you read is true no matter how sick it seems.
Remember it is a Danish Bank we are writing about.
The Skaarup family
Soevej 5. 3100.