While we fix the bank news.
If we move the many sub-pages to the block, this is done to tell you more about the many different criminal conditions, where the Jyske Bank Group very clearly violates the Criminal Code, and thus is to be described as criminal.
And individually we will review and explain on the pages, each one of Jyske Bank’s many violations of the penal code provisions, and document them with 1st conditions on each page.
As well as making a page. With our total allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, and insert the said attachments, where they are mentioned in the closing reply letter from 28-10-2019.
The customer accuses Jyske Bank’s group management, in association, to stand behind, the bank’s continued fraud against Jyske Bank’s own customer.
This will be the case with the Danish authorities, which the police do not control, which is why Danish bank customers, in fact, stand alone against the largest and most powerful, apparently criminal organizations in Denmark.
There will also be audio clips shared with the client’s former attorneys, so you can hear both.
Law firm Rödstenen. Dalgas Ave 42, 8000 Aarhus +4586121999
Lundgrens Advokat partner company. Tuborg Boulevard 12. DK-2900 Hellerup +4535252535
In the shared recorded conversations, you will hear both Lundgrens and Rödstenen employees, even very clearly, and may be clearly informed by telephone.
Partly the client’s many repetitive allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, but not least emphasizes the seriousness of the case, where the client repeatedly, says that it is a fraud and false case.
Which most recently Lundgren’s staff, attorney Emil Hald Winstrøm in all telephone conversations has been disclosed.
Emil Hald Winstrøm confirms by telephone, that he has understood. that this is a fraud case.
Nevertheless, on behalf of partner Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren’s attorneys on September 2, 2019, Emil Hald Winstrøm presents the case to the court, without including any of the client’s claims.
And without sharing Lundgren’s claim document with the client.
Although Lundgren’s lawyer, and partner Dan Terkildsen is subsequently sued for a copy of their own claim document from 2 September 2019.
(since it has nothing to do with the client’s claims.)
Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen choose again not to share court documents, with their client.
We will continually, share a lot where we can clearly prove, that several Lundgren’s attorneys must have planned, not to submit their client’s claims.
The client has really been without a lawyer since February 5, 2018 when Lundgrens was hired, and up to Lundgrens 25. September 2019 was fired.
This case clearly shows how some of Denmark’s biggest lawyers, by their actions, are a serious threat to legal certainty.
The case here is a terrible example of how Danish lawyers, like here the plaintiffs’ lawyers Lundgrens have really, counteracted their client.
At the same time that Plaintiff’s Attorneys really worked for Defendants in the case, removing Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants.
As here in the case where plaintiff’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S were not presented to the court.
Plaintiff’s attorney here Lundgrens, in this way, has shown that the law firm, in fact, has work to disappoint in legal matters, by going directly against the client’s instructions.
As Lundgrens Advokater chooses not only to work against their client, but also chose to pursue another case against Jyske Bank A/S.
Than the case against Jyske Bank for fraud as the client February 5, 2018, transferred to Lundgren’s lawyers.
Lundgren’s Attorneys have harmed the confidence of the Danish lawyers, by unethical, dishonesty and possibly by violations of the law, made every effort to prevent their client’s claims from being brought to court.
Can clients in the large law firms soon rely on the lawyers they employ if Jyske Bank A/S may pay Lundgrens, or otherwise have caused Lundgrens to do the exact opposite of what their client has 100 times said and written to be presented.
What do we have to do with great Danish lawyers like Lundgren’s Lawyers.
The case here is about the big Danish lawyer’s houses really to be trusted.
We can prove that several of those employed in Lundgrens, have proven to work against the client, rather than working for the client.
One thing here is that the client wants Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank A/S, to stop the bank’s fraud against the customer.
This they asked Lundgrens to help them with, instead Lundgrens is employed by Jyske Bank, and what happened then ?.
The client believes that the Jyske Bank groups have paid Lundgrens for not submitting their client claims to the court.
This is a serious problem for all Danes
And if the same lawyers as here Lundgrens, has clients in the US., ENGLAND, RUSSIA, CHINA, JAPAN, GERMANY Can these clients also get into the same problems as us?
When Danish clients obviously can’t trust big Danish lawyer houses like Lundgrens.
Then Lundgrens becomes a major threat to legal certainty.
If you cannot trust the lawyer you hire will be loyal to you, as their client, this is a grave problem.
Lundgrens chose not to answer their client, or to share court documents with the client, which does not look good.
22-08-2018 til jyskebank
Og beder bestyrelsen underskrive om de vil fritages fra ansvar ved at underskrive
Og svare på om bestyrelsen vil indrømme bedrageri
Og ikke vil medvirke til dette fortsatte bedrageri mod kunde i jyske bank
Medsendte det sammen hæftet og rettet brev
Fra 07-08-2018 da ingen i bestyrelsen har svaret retur.
Anmode på side 2 i brevet fra 07-08 om underskrift
Fra de medlemmer
#Kurt #Bligaard #Pedersen
#Jens A. #Borup
#Christina #Lykke #Munk
#Niels #Erik #Jakobsen
Som ønsker sagen ført for en dommer
Vi gensendte dette 22-08-2018.
Da vi ikke ved om posten kunne finde banken.
Samt lagde en kopi
I postkassen jyske bank Helsingør
Såfremt jyske bank ikke ønskede sagen forliget underskriv bare side 2.
ER JYSKE BANK EN KRIMINEL BANK
En historie om at overleve en Banks lange
Og fuldt ud bevidste bedrageri imod virksomhed
Jyske Banks koncernledelse sammen med advokat virksomheden
Lund Elmer Sandager
Anders Dam sørger for denne underminering
Sammen med de øvrige 12 medlemmer af hovedbestyrelsen.
Det er nu den samlede Konsernledelse som bære ansvaret
For alle fortsatte opråb på sider som denne
Hvor opslag kun er til for at få dialog med DIRIKTØR Anders Dam
Til dig som læser med,
Men som har svært ved at forstå hvor stort et bank bedrag dette her er
Tak for kedelig kaffe
Er det ikke sandt hvad vi skriver, retter vi gene på opfordring
Fik jyske bank ikke forud for dette nye tilbud 06-05-2009
Et nyt budget
Men var det nogle renter eller provisioner med til jyske bank ?
Nej det var der ikke
Som jyske bank nægter at bevise kunden har omlagt
Alt imens har jyske bank brugt bankens adgang til kundens konto og midler,
og hævet eller taget fra kunde
Ialt. 423.961 kr.
hvor meget svig skal der til ?
Før det bliver rigtigt alvorligt bedrageri
HVAD FANDEN BILDER DU DIG IND
DEL 1 SLUT