28-10-2019- Page 1-57.
FREMLAGT som et Processkrift 3. Men Jyske Bank kunne ikke forstå hvad sagsøger skrev, og forlangte at sagsøger fik en advokat til at fremlægge sagsøgers svig sag mod Jyske Bank, derfor genfremlage sagsøgers advokat 04-05-2020 dette her som et bilag til et nyt Processkrift 3
The closing remarks.
At the bottom you can read all the allegations submitted from 28-10-2019. without using link for download document
The closing remarks BS-402/2015-VIB. This is the first time the client is allowed to submit their fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S, after their 2 most recent attorneys in total for 43 months countered their client in every way.
First, the law firm of Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen hired their client.
And then saw, the same problem with the i loyal lawyers, from the law firm partner Lundgrens by partner Dan Terkildsen.
Until the client 24-09-2019. fired Lundgren’s lawyers.
And then 28-10-2019 alone must present their allegations against Jyske Bank’s group for gross fraud.
Here is what the customer had to present 28-10-2019. filled with writing and spelling mistakes
After Lundgrens had to be either incredibly incompetent or stupid if Lundgrens is not just corrupt
And has agreed with Jyske Bank’s management, not to submit some of the client’s allegations with supporting evidence.
Read some of the shared letters to the Group Executive Group and the Board of Directors at these links
Read the closing comments here, or read the shared pages.
Download closing remarks
One of Jyske Bank’s fraud cases against the bank’s own customers.
Which is supported by an agreed Group management group, together with an equally agreed board of directors who are aware of the Bank’s Fraud.
After Lundgren’s client 21-09-2019 discovers that Jyske Bank Group Management employed Lundgren’s lawyers, around April 2018.
Only a few months after the client 05-02-2018 employed Lundgren’s partner, by Dan Terkildsen to presented a folder with evidence against Jyske Banks massive fraud against Jyske Bank’s one customer.
That Lundgrens is hired to advise Jyske Bank, in connection, with a sale for 600 million dkk. only a few months after Lundgrens was hired to file a case of million fraud against Jyske Bank A/S together.
It seriously smells like Jyske Bank also uses bribery to get Lundgren’s lawyers to counter the client’s claims against Jyske Bank being presented to the courts.
Danish customers believe That Lundgren’slaw firm is jeopardize legal certainty in Denmark.
Therefore the former client, complaining about Lundgren’s lawyers, for having acted saddely and in loyalty to their own client.
Which was after Defendant Jyske Bank initiated their million co-operation, with Plaintiff’s attorney Lundgren’s lawyers.
Lundgren’s Partner Dan Terkildsen writes that there are conspiracy theories, and nothing to wear.
A case of a major Danish bank’s financial fraud, document false, and that Lundgren’s Attorney’s negligence, which by countering the client’s claims against Jyske Bank will not be presented to the courts, in order to help the defendant the Danish Jyske bank to disappoint in legal matters.
This is just what the former client of Lundgren’s attorneys wrote in the submitted closing reply of 28-10-2019.
Why Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys at Philip Baruch have written to the court.
And Jyske Bank board member Philip Baruch writes that Jyske Bank A/S strongly distances the applicant’s accusations against Lundgren’s lawyers for having taken bribes.
Without taking away the plaintiff, the defendant accuses Jyske Bank A/S of using bribery, hidden as a return commission.
What is highlighted are some spelling and typing errors we have found. But we have been without a lawyer for the previous 43 months, even though we believed in the latest Lundgren’s lawyers, actually working for us, not just sending bills, of about DKK 200,000 to help defendant Jyske Bank A/S not to present plaintiff’s claims against Jyske Bank.
Jyske bank Vesterbro behind large fraud against customer, through document manipulation, and FALSE Or it is called removing agreement documents, Jyske Bank’s group leader group or the Board of Directors of Denmark’s second largest bank has no comment, but does not believe that Jyske Bank is doing anything wrong, the Bank does just as Jyske bank always does.
Link to the letter where the customer informs the group management group, and legal director Peter Stig Hansen.
And CEO Anders Christian Dam that Jyske Bank A/S exposes customer to fraud.
Jyske Bank’s powerful group management refuses to answer the small customer and will not stop the bank’s fraud crimes.
TO THE GROUP MANAGER GROUP HERE.
Where a customer asks the group not to make a fraud against their customers, or at least talk to them.
This is how Jyske Bank treats its customers, you can very easily be exposed to the same scams and exploits, and discover that the police will not help stop the largest criminal Danish organizations.