27-08-2019. S.2-2. Process document C. It states that Lundgrens has submitted Appendices 28-104. 09-07-2019, we have found that it is not the same document as the Client submitted 28-12-2018. – Eksempel på hvad der ikke er en overtrædelse af god advokat skik, efter advokat nævnets afgørelse i klagen 2020-1932. over Lundgrens advokater.

Procedure C. this chooses Lundgrens by Partner Dan Terkildsen to keep hidden from their client, we get it after Lundgrens 25-09-2019 gets fired, on suspicion of bribery. - Please note that Lundgren's Attorneys have not sent a copy of their client . Petition B. 20-03-2019. . Petition C. 27-08-2019. . and Petition 2. 02-09-2019 . Just as Lundgren has also withheld several other court documents to their client, such as the court's letter of 08-01-2019, where the court states that they disregard Appendix 28-101. with the client's allegations from 28-12-2018 . At the same time that Lundgrens is working for the defendant in the case. . And Lundgren's attorneys have worked against everything that can be known as good attorney practice. . And have no control over the document number, submitted documents without covering the BBC by mail. . And otherwise, annexed 09-07-2019 presented without informing the court why, or notifying the client. . This case showed that the Danish legal community is under pressure from both Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager and not least Jyske Bank.

27-08-2019. S.2-2.
Process document C.
It states that Lundgrens has submitted Appendices 28-104. 09-07-2019, we have found that it is not the same document as the Client submitted 28-12-2018.

The client who has found one lawyer.
Who is alone.
And who is honest.

And would like to help the client bring their case against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and false in danish court.

Now at least these 5 lawyers.
at Lundgren’s partner company

Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director

All these in Lundgren’s partner company, has had with our case to do, should so many lawyers at Lundgrens be able to misunderstand, what we have continuously written.
!
Hardly.

Or have Lundgrens, received a million payments from Jyske Bank A/S
In the form of return commission. just to misunderstand, and ignore everything, which we have constantly written, should be presented in court.

As Thomas Schioldan Sørensen has sent our case and many letters, and emails to Lundgren’s many attorneys, as so also has been able, to see and read the letters which we since February 2016, have been sent to Thomas Schioldan Sørensen rodstenen, about changing the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and false.

That Thomas Schioldan Sørensen from Rödstenen has ignored, our new allegations is on thing, but that Lundgrens can be bought by the defendant, to work for the defendant is abhorrent.

And so Lundgrens has even boasted about it on their own website. “by Niels Gram-Hanssen partner”

Although Partner Dan Terkildsen of Lundergren’s lawyers, after they were fired, has written
It is conspiracy theories.

And that Lundgrens has done a great job for us. Then we thought this is similar to more and more damaging business, and it seemed to happen by bribery between some of Denmark’s largest companies.

But here Goliath is up against little David, who does not intend to give up just because Jyske Bank has found political contacts.