This is a WARNING AGAINST JYSKE BANK A/S. My diary and history are a warning against criminal Danish banks such as Jyske Bank CEO Lars Stensgaard Mørch, and disloyal Danish law firms such as Lundgren’s, corruption / cronyism among Danish judges such as Kurt Rasmussen.
NEWS ABOUT THE JYSKE BANK, AND THE JYSKE BANK BILEN. As Carsten’s private advertisements on these cars are called and my telling is about criminal Danish banks and corrupt Danish lawyers. The Banking News. UPDATED LATEST 24-09-2024. Time. 11.40.
Dokumentation og dokumenter som Carsten vil have dommeren i Helsingør Byret til at gengå, og forud for afgørelsen i hvert at Jyske Banks påstand om forbud, vil have at domneren “navn undlades her.” med loven op imod Jyske Banks handlinger, er disse en overtrædelse eller er de ikke en overtrædelse.
Det er blot et spørgsmål om jeg skriver sandt, eller om dommeren vil dømme at jeg lyver omkring det jeg siden 2016 har skrevet.
Jeg udskifter denne her forside, med fuld dokumentation for Jyske Banks mange forskellige lovovertrædelser, som Jyske Bank vil have et forbud mod at jeg skriver om, ligesom Jyske Bank koncernen vil have et forbud mod at jeg får Jyske Bank overtrædelse af tinglysnings loven fremlagt for retten.
Faktum.
26.02.2021. Susannne Sørensen sletter pant og ændre i pante brev uden tilladelse.
Jeg beder gentagne Jyske Bank om at vise
storhed, hæderlighed, redelighed,
anstændighed, ærlighed, som jeg skrev i denne her mail. 11-08-2023. LINK. og her mailen 23-06-2023. LINK. her en mail fra 03-09-2023. LINK.
At den tidligere kunde siger Jyske Bank lyver, kan du læse i dette dokument, der ligeledes er sendt til Jyske Bank.
banknyt.dk
https://banknyt.dk › 2023/01PDF
15 maj 2022. Her er beviser for at Jyske Bank lyver, med bilag, er ikke færdig.
07-08-2023. Link. her skriver Jysk bank. Er det ham der er helt fra den.
Der er anlagt en civil anderkendelse sag, som Jyske Bank A/S vil have afvist, da Lund Elmer Sandager advokater skriver de mener jeg har retlig interesse i at få Jyske Banks lovovertrædelse fremlagt for domstolene.
I forbindelse med Jyske Banks afvisnings påstand, vil jeg nok svare nogenlunde sådan.
Sagens realitet vedrører spørgsmålet, om Sagsøgeren Jyske Bank og Jyske Banks ansatte medarbejder har været forpligtet til at overholde tinglysningslovens § 11.
Sagsøger Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup gør følgende anbringender gældende:
1.
Det handler om den danske befolkning i ammenlighed, har ret til, at få en banks lovovertrædelser fremlagt og prøvet for retten.
2.
Det handler om retssikkerheden for ikke kun sagsøger, men for hele befolkningen, og om Jyske Bank må foretage overtrædelse af lovgivningen, uden den som Jyske Bank har lavet en overtrædelse overfor, overordnede må få fremlagt sin overtrædelse sag mod Jyske Bank for dommer, hvilket her er en anderkendelse sag, fremlagt for domstolene.
Eller om en sagsøger mod Jyske Bank eller en anden bank, for overtrædelse af tinglysningsloven, ikke må få fremlagt sin sag om bankens lovovertrædelser for domstolene, da bankens lovovertrædels vil skade tilliden til banken, for manglende evne til at fortolke og overholde loven.
3.
Der er således i den anlagte civile sag BS-6653/2024-VIB tale om et spørgsmål, om fortolkningen af tinglysning lovens § 11.
Sagen der er blevet skåret helt ind til benet, handler reelt om retssikkerhed, og om banker må rette i pantebreve, så som at fjerne et pant i en ejendom, i mod ejerens ønske, og uden ejers samtykke / accept eller godkendelse, selv dette er en klar lovovertrædelse.
§ 11
Udslettelse eller forandring af en ret over en tjenende ejendom kræver kun samtykke fra ejeren af den herskende ejendom.
Spørgsmålet er om Jyske Bank må overtræde denne lov, og om banken mod gå imod ejers ønsker og instruks, og et sådant spørgsmål, er bedst egnet til at blive afgjort af domstolene.
Sagsøgeren har noteret at denne overtrædelse, hvor Jyske Bank A/S uden tilladelse og i mod instruks, har slettet en ejers pantsætning, hvilket kan være en direkte overtrædelse af grundlovens § 73.
Med henvisning til overtrædelsen tinglysning lovens § 11.
4.
Sagens realitet der vedrører spørgsmålet, om Sagsøgeren Jyske Bank og Jyske Banks ansatte medarbejder har været forpligtet til at overholde tinglysningslovens § 11.
Det må anses at være i Jyske Banks egen interesse at lære at forstå og fortolke loven, som den er skrevet, hvilket kan ske i retten.
I det omfang at tinglysnings “loven § 11. ikke gælder for Jyske Bank, er der i almenvellets interesse, at få klarlagt i domstolen, hvilke kun kan ske efter dom.
Hvilket kun kan skal ske, ved at dommeren dømmer i mod det som står loven.
Hvis retten beslutter på Jyske Banks anmodning, at afvise sagen, om Jyske Banks dokumentet overtrædelse af tinglysnings loven, vil dette forhindre en yderligere undersøgelse, så som at der i forbindelse med overtrædelse af tinglysningensloven også er sket en overtrædelse af grundlovens § 73.
Hvis retten desuden beslutter på Jyske Banks anmodning, at afvise sagen, om Jyske Banks dokumentet overtrædelse af tinglysnings loven, vil dette skabe præcedens, og Jyske Bank vil ikke fremtiden behøve at overholde lovgivningen, hvor det lovbestemt kræver ejerens samtykke, eller at Jyske Bank skal have en ejers accept, forud for ændringer og sletning af pantsætning i ejendomme.
§ 73
Stk. 1. Ejendomsretten er ukrænkelig. Ingen kan tilpligtes at afstå sin ejendom, uden hvor almenvellet kræver det. Det kan kun ske ifølge lov
I min sagsøgers sag om Carstens private pant, lægges der særlig vægt på, at der er tale om en privat ejendoms-ret til pantet i en fast ejendom, hvor der – såfremt denne afstår fra – er tale om ekspropriation, hvilket kræver overholdelse af grundlovens § 73.
Hvis Dommeren efter Jyske Banks ønske, fratager sagsøgers mulighed for at føre en sag mod Jyske Bank for lovovertrædelse, vil det være krænkende, ikke kun for sagsøger men for befolkningens retssikkerhed.
5.
Spørgsmålet er i sagen alene om Jyske Bank skal over holde tinglysnings loven, altså om Jyske Bank A/S har overtrådt tinglysnings loven, spørgsmålet har allerede været fremlagt for Tinglysningsretten, der har henvist til domstolene.
Hvorfor Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup har stævnet Jyske Bank A/S for i byretten, at få en dommerens afgørelse, udfra den dokumenterede lovovertrædelse, efter det som klart er skrevet i loven.
6.
Yderligere har Sagsøgte Jyske Bank A/S interesse i at undgå at blive inddraget i en overtrædelses sag, omkring en dokumenteret overtrædelse af lovgivningen som banker er underlagt.
7.
Retssystemet giver mulighed for at få en afgørelse der understreger, om banker overhovedet er pligtig til at skulle overholde tinglysningslovens bestemmelser.
Ved at kunne dømme, om der overhovedet er juridisk grundlag for at rejse en anderkendelse sag, i forbindelse med overtrædelsen af Tinglysningsloven.
lovgivning anderkendelse sag, hvor Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup nedlægger påstand, om at Jyske Bank bliver dømt til at anderkende at have overtrådt tinglysnings loven.
Når retssystemet giver mulighed for en afgørelse af, om der overhovedet er juridisk grundlag for at rejse en anderkendelse sag, skal Jyske Bank naturligvis ikke kunne få dommen til at afvise, den lille mands ret , til at søge oprejsning.
8.
Hertil kommer at udviklingen i retspraksis i de senere år generelt støtter, at retssubjekter i stadigt større omfang tillægges den fornødne retlige interesse til at få afgjort retsspørgsmål, der berører de pågældende væsentligt og individuelt
Nej det er ikke kun mig som har fortrudt at have haft nogen med Jyske Bank at gøre, her skriver en anden om 20 millioner danske kroner der forsvandt i Jyske Bank A/S det vil jeg vende tilbage til.
News from Horten lawyers, who through partner Birgitte Frølund have covered up the corrupt Lundgren’s lawyers, to cover up that Jyske Bank has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to lose the fraud case against Jyske Bank.
Horten expels Nicolai Dyhr after extensive disclosure, that Nicolai Dyhr has helped criminals, as others in Horten have too.
Danish TV 2. films Nicolai Dyhr, lawyer at Horten, who offers criminals to participate in mandate fraud, see the black swan.
A documentary that is for a Cavling prize.
But that will hardly stop the corruption that Danish companies like Jyske Bank A/S benefit from.
KLIK PÅ LINK.
06-05-2024. MAIL JYSKE BANK MED FLERE. HVAD ER I SÅ BANGE FOR. DET ER STADIG TILLADT AT SVARE OG TALE MED MIG, HVIS I HAR NOGET I ØNSKER RETTET. FWD: MAIL TIL JYSKE BANK, KONCERNLEDERGRUPPEN OG JURIDISK AFDELING SAMT TIL ADVOKAT SAMFUNDET DER VED FLERE MEDLEMMER OG DOMMERE ER MEDVIRKENDE TIL AT DÆKKE OVER KORRUPTION BLANDT DERES MEDLEMMER, SOM FORTALT HER PÅ BLA. WWW.BANKNYT.DK FOR AT DÆKKE OVER DEN KRIMINELLE JYSKE BANK A/S.
BS-6653/2024-VIB. ændre sag. Ændre som telefonisk sagt til Martin Skovsted-Nielsen i marts 2024. sagen mod Jyske Bank A/S til kun at omhandle en anderkendelse dom for overtrædelse af tinglysningslovens § 11. sagen er principiel og omhandler nu kun dette forhold., Mail to Jyske Bank and Cort, cases against the criminal Danish Bank, Jyske Bank, 17. apr. 2024, time 11.13
Lidt fra det jeg har skrevet til rette om den kriminelle Jyske bank.
22-04-2024. BS-6653_2024-VIB. MAIL. ændre sag. at alene omhandle en anderkendelse dom for overtrædelse af tinglysningslovens § 11, #JyskeBank, #Banking, #Lån, #penge, #Money, #Banks, #Bank, #JyskeBankBil, www.banknyt.dk JyskeBank, Banking, Lån, penge, Money, Banks, Bank, JyskeBankBil, invest, Investere, investering, find Bank, Kriminel, Bank, Investorer, BRFFONDEN, Strandgade 52, 1401 København K, , Revisorer, ERNST & YOUNG, EY, Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab, Dirch Passers Allé 36, 2000 Frederiksberg, , Direktion, Direktør, Kristian May, Skovkæret 3, Gadevang, 3400, Hillerød, , Bestyrels, Formand, Lars Henrik Munch, Galionsvej 46, 1437, København K, , Næstformand, Rina Asmussen, Emiliekildevej 28, 2930, Klampenborg, , Matias Møl Dalsgaard, Paludan Müllers Vej 3. 2. tv, 1815, Frederiksberg C, , Anne Andersen, , Stina Vrang Elias, Gl Strandvej 222, 3050, Humlebæk, , Liselotte Højgaard, Grønningen 21, 4. 1270, København K, , Revisor, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS STATSAUTORISERET REVISIONSPARTNERSELSKAB, Strandvejen 44, 2900, Hellerup,
17-05-2024. Ændret påstand. i stævning af Jyske Bank Cvr. 17616617. i anerkendelse søgsmål for overtrædelse af tinglysningslovens § 11,
Svarskrift BS-6653-24-VIB. 17 maj 2024. #JyskeBank, #Banking, #Lån, #penge, #Money, #Banks, #Bank, #JyskeBankBil, www.banknyt.dk JyskeBank, Banking, Lån, penge, Money, Banks, Bank, JyskeBankBil, invest, Investere, investering, find Bank, Kriminel, Bank, Investorer, BRFFONDEN, Strandgade 52, 1401 København K, , Revisorer, ERNST & YOUNG, EY, Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab, Dirch Passers Allé 36, 2000 Frederiksberg, , Direktion, Direktør, Kristian May, Skovkæret 3, Gadevang, 3400, Hillerød, , Bestyrels, Formand, Lars Henrik Munch, Galionsvej 46, 1437, København K, , Næstformand, Rina Asmussen, Emiliekildevej 28, 2930, Klampenborg, , Matias Møl Dalsgaard, Paludan Müllers Vej 3. 2. tv, 1815, Frederiksberg C, , Anne Andersen, , Stina Vrang Elias, Gl Strandvej 222, 3050, Humlebæk, , Liselotte Højgaard, Grønningen 21, 4. 1270, København K, , Revisor, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS STATSAUTORISERET REVISIONSPARTNERSELSKAB, Strandvejen 44, 2900, Hellerup,
Svarskrift Jyske Bank. den 8. april 2024. #JyskeBank, #Banking, #Lån, #penge, #Money, #Banks, #Bank, #JyskeBankBil, www.banknyt.dk JyskeBank, Banking, Lån, penge, Money, Banks, Bank, JyskeBankBil, invest, Investere, investering, find Bank, Kriminel, Bank, Investorer,
Anmodning om 3 dommere af 17. maj 2024. #JyskeBank, #Banking, #Lån, #penge, #Money, #Banks, #Bank, #JyskeBankBil, www.banknyt.dk JyskeBank, Banking, Lån, penge, Money, Banks, Bank, JyskeBankBil, invest, Investere, investering, find Bank, Kriminel, Bank, Investorer,
Det var Susanne Sørensen der for Jyske Bank som lavede overtrædelse af tinglysningsloven, Susanne Sørensen, Senior Operations og Innovation Officer – Balance i økonomien, +4589894863, s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk
One of 280 Videos, 13 maj 2024. to Jyske Bank head of department, for the crime that the banks employees as Nicolaj Hansen, Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen, Anette Kirkeby and many more is behind, see more at YouTube, the enemy of the Jyske Bank klik here. YouTube
Jyske Banks fjende nr. 1 Carsten Storbjerg.
Her is a link to YouTube video, 13 maj 2024. to Jyske Bank head of department, for the crime that the banks employees is behind.
Det var Nicolai Hansen som ved fuldmagt misbrug sammen med Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen startende bondefangeri “bedrageri.” mod kunde i Jyske Bank findes her på LinkedIn, Nicolai Hansen,Erhvervspartner, Internationalt Erhverv, +45 89 89 17 74, nicolai-hansen@jyskebank.dk,
Og her finder du Casper Dam Olsen på LinkedIn, der hjalp Nicolai Hansen med at lyve, for at kunne dække over det bedrageri som Nicolai Hansen for Jyske Bank koncernen startede sammen med flere medarbejdere “kriminelle.” i Jyske Bank A/S, Casper Dam Olsen, Erhvervspartner Jyske Bank Hillerød, +45 89 89 17 73, casper-dam@jyskebank.dk
23-03-2024. Warning against cooperating with Jyske Bank and Lundgrens lawyers, youtube.
Til jer som sammenarbejder, direkte, og eller, indirekte, med Jyske Bank, eller har, Relationer,
I skal kende til, Jyske Banks svindel mod kunder, flere af jer er allerede blevet oplyst om Jyske Banks, brug af :
Svig, Bedrageri, Falsk, Dokumentfalsk, Hvidvaskning, efter Bedrageri, og, Mandatsvig,
Læs mere i min dagbog, Banknyt.dk
THE PAGE is continuously updated, and members of boards are added.
Who are on the same boards as the criminal Danish Bank Jyske Bank A/S.
KLIK her:, Find Jyske Bank Bilen, om, Løgn, Svig, Falsk, Forfalskning, Bedrageri, udført af flere ansatte sammen i forening, fundamentet i Jyske Bank, A/S,
Which of these Mentioned, covers op Jyske Bank’s use of, Lies, Fraud, Forgery, and other, fraud crime, Jyske Bank car, advertisements, for and about Jyske Bank’s offences,
Kladde til kontakt info Jyske Bank Private, find Jyske Bank ansatte, medlemmer af bestyrelser, samt relationer.
🤐
🤨
SAMMEN VIDEO PÅ YOUTUBE. 18-03-2024. Jyske Banks ansatte løj over for kunde med støre hjerneblødning, og JYSKE BANK kunne så lave bondefangeri “bedrageri” mod kunde,
.
See more below.
Here the Managing Director of Jyske Bank is lying to Berlingske Tiderne BT. If Jyske Bank knowingly not have made Bondefangeri “fraud.”
The board member of Jyske Bank’s powerful boards – network, BRFHOLDING A/S, BRFFONDEN, BRFinvest a/s, FONDEN FOR HÅNDVÄRKSKOLEGIER, Lars Henrik Munch who is one of the most powerful people in the Danish media world, is on the board of EKSTRA BLADET, POLITIKEN, JYLLANDS-POSTEN, perhaps that is why the Danish press does not want to write anything about Denmark’s eighth largest bank’s many violations of the law, such as document forgery, fraud, abuse of power of attorney, mandate fraud, violation of the Public Information Act, I want openness and conversation about Jyske Bank’s fraud, and why the Danish Government and the parliament, together with the financial supervisory authority, allows Jyske Bank to operate a bank in Denmark when it is clear that several of Jyske Bank’s employees are lying and acting in bad faith, in order to make money for the shareholders such as ATP,
On March 14, 2024, Martin Skovsted-Nielsen admitted by telephone that Jyske Bank, through Susanne Sørensen, had violated the land registration act, but did not sign this, except that I did not mention some of the participating employees, such as Nicolai Hansen, Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen, Susanne Sørensen and more.
12-03-2024. Here you will find the latest tags, and lists of those I wish to be informed about Jyske Bank’s many offences, Jyske would like to inform everyone mentioned that their tag is used to share my story about Jyske Bank’s offenses and business methods.
Det skal oplyses at kun nogle af de tagget, eller og nævnte personer er direkte forbundet med nogle af Jyske Banks lovovertrædelser, resten bedes blot gøre sig bekendt med grunden til mine advarsler mod at arbejde for Jyske Bank, eller disse advares i mod at sammenarbejde med Jyske Bank A/S.
It must be stated that only some of the people tagged or mentioned are directly connected to some of Jyske Bank’s offences, the rest are simply asked to familiarize themselves with the reason for my warnings against working for Jyske Bank, or they are warned against cooperating with Jyske Bank A/S.
See. 11-03-2023. Jyske Bank by legal director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen said 14 March 2024. that Jyske Bank would only admit a violation of the land registration act if I removed the names of people such as Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen, as well as advertisements on the Jyske Bank car and more, and, incidentally, Jyske Bank would not admit that, for example, Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen have lied, both are employed by Jyske Bank Hillerød. Read more in tags here in the link, is in Danish.
See again my YouTube video to Jyske Bank fron 18. maj 2021.
See the video 19 may 2021. Again.
Former covers of banknyt.dk in my diary about being a customer of Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank, have been shared the dates.
12.02.2016. time. 14:52. / 23.05.2018. time. 21:12. / 09.09.2018. time. 12:52. / 15.03.2020. time. 9:33. / 09.12.2020. time. 7:57. / 22.01.2022. time. 11:35. / 01.03.2022. time. 14:47. / 07.05.2022. time. 8:19. / 29.05.2022. time. 13:14. / 03.06.2022. time. 10:25. / 08.06.2022. time. 6:40. / 23.06.2022. time. 0:32. / 04.07.2022. time. 10:52. / 11.07.2022. time. 8:24. / 07.08.2022. time. 12:02. / 08.09.2022. time. 14:15. / 01.02.2023. time. 12:30. / 05.10.2023. time. 9:36. / 29.01.2024. time. 9:19.
www.Storbjerg.dk
Spørg Kromann Reumert, Horten, Dansk Erhverv, Nævntes Hus, Domstols styrelsen, Justitsministeret, Advokat samfundet, DLA Piper, hvorfor det ikke er en overtrædelse af god advokatskik, når danske advokater som LUNDGRENS ikke vil dele processkrifter i klintens egen sag, med deres klienter. ?.
IF SOMEONE AT JYSKE BANK A/S THROUGH JYSKE BANK’S DIRECTOR, CEO LARS STENSGAARD MØRCH WANTS TO THREATEN ME WITH A LIBEL CASE, THEN YOU CAN JUST COME, I DON’T WANT TO LISTEN TO THE JYSKE BANK IS THREATENING, AFTER JYSKE BANK HAS POSTPONED MY COMPANY TO ORGANIZED FRAUD.
This will naver go away, by you threats, mister Lars Stensgaard Mørch.
Jyske Banks fjerde nr. 1. billeder.
Jyske Banks fjerde nr. 1. videoer.
Jyske Banks fjerde nr. 1. blandet facebook m.m.
Do you also think that the Danish state, the board of the national bank, the Danish FSA, “Financial Supervisory Authority.” as well as the government and the parliament, that it is perfectly fine to cooperate with Danish banks that, as here in my example with Jyske Bank, which has repeatedly violated the law, lied to the court for to be able to cover up extensive violations of the law, then you just have to continue to keep your mouth shut in order to be able to cover up the Jyske Bank group that refuses to apologize for violating the law.
BS-6653/2024-VIB. CARSTEN STORBJERG SKAARUP IMOD JYSKE BANK A/S I EN ANDERKENDELSE SAG OM OVERTRÆDELSE AF TINGLYSNINGSLOVEN.
Read more in English below.
How do you undermine the legal certainty of the population, this happens in Denmark by the use of cronyism, which in turn is to cover up the offenses of criminal friends, regardless of how few millions of kroner, for example, the Jyske Bank group has committed fraud for.
Nogle af mange medvirkende i min historie om at være kunde i Jyske Bank A/S hvilket Dan Stampe Terkelsen var en stor del af, i forbindelse med at have vist sig at Lundgrens advokater var korrupte, da Lundgrens advokater lod sig ansætte og betale af Jyske Bank, og som herefter sørgede for at Lundgrens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, ikke fremlægger det svig og falsk, som Lundgrens var blevet ansatte til at fremlægge mod mod Jyske Bank for domstolene.
Read her the latest email 5, marts 2024, to, presse@atp.dk, rbj@pfa.dk, The email to Danish pension companies, who are loyal investors in criminal organisations, as the Jyske Bank group has proven to be.
TO: REU@ft.dk, bankdata@bankdata.dk, jndata@jndata.dk, danskebank@danskebank.dk, jnj@atp.dk, finanstilsynet@ftnet.dk, mail@finansdanmark.dk, Justitsministeriet <jm@jm.dk>, fm@fm.dk, Statsministeriet <stm@stm.dk>, kontakt@apmollerfonde.dk, Folketingets Oplysning <folketinget@ft.dk>, redaktionen@altinget.dk, MA_Redaktion <redaktion@midtjyllandsavis.dk>, Jura og Forretning <jur@domstolsstyrelsen.dk>, postkasse@advokatsamfundet.dk, Juridisk Afdeling <juridisk@jyskebank.dk>, KONCERNDIREKTIONSSEKRETARIATET <direktion@jyskebank.dk>, Martin Skovsted-Nielsen <martin.nielsen@jyskebank.dk>, Morten Ulrik Gade <MUG@jyskebank.dk>
In Denmark, it is public knowledge that the Jyske Bank group refuses to comply with Danish legislation, yet the government chooses together with the authorities, as the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Danish National Bank, the Ministry of Justice and Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen to turn their heads the other way, as Jyske Bank means more to parliament, than legal certainty does for the Danish population.
Read the mail here 05-03-2024. VIL I FORTSAT IGNORER MINE HENVENDELSER, OG PÅ DEN MÅDE DÆKKE OVER JYSKE BANKS OVERTRÆDELSE AF LOVENS BESTEMMELSER, LÆS KOPI TIL JYSKE BANK, JEG FJERNER INTET UNDTAGEN VI AFTALER DET, OG AT JEG GERNE VIL DETTE, SYNTES IKKE AT HAVE JYSKE BANK OG DIREKTIONENS INTERESSE. MARTIN SKOVSTED-NIELSEN JEG AFVENTER STADIG PÅ INDRØMMELSER ELLER ANDRE FORSLAG.
Mail 5. mar. 2024, 01.39.
Lars Stensgaard Mørch fired after money laundering for 1,500 billion kroner, in the case of the world’s largest money white-washing case.
Disse Youtube videoer er ikke delt uden grund, har Jyske Bank eller bankens venner nogle spørgsmål eller kommentarer til nogle af disse videoer så ring +4522227713 og aftal et møde med mig Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup.
Lars Stensgaard Mørch og Martin Skovsted-Nielsen hvad er Jyske Bank’s muligheder, #Svindel #Bank, #tyv,
YouTube · Jyske Banks fjende nr. 1 Carsten Storbjerg
25. dec. 2023
YouTube
https://m.youtube.com › videos
Jyske Banks fjende nr. 1 Carsten Storbjerg
Jyske Banks fjende nr. 1 Carsten Storbjerg. @JyskeBank.‧ ‧274 videos‧. Er du selv blevet udsat for svindel i Jyske Bank A/S.
Min fortælling om den kriminelle Jyske Bank A/S hvor særligt Nicolai Hansen, Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen og Casper Dam Olsen var nogle af dem, der sammen i foreningen, sørgede for at Jyske Banks bondefangeri “bedrageri” kunne lykkes og fortsætte.
Find ansatte I Jyske Bank.
Uden disse 3 der stod bag Jyske Banks bondefangeri “Bedrageri” ville der ikke være så meget at skrive, om, men Jyske Bank samler åbenbart på medarbejder, der kan arbejde som særligt disse ansatte, der er blandt de udspekuleret ansatte i Jyske Bank A/S koncernen, som mod min tidligere virksomhed, sammen i forening har sørget for at udsætte mig og virksomheden for omfattende svindel, startende med udførelsen af bondefangeri hvilket blev udført ved brug af dokumentfalsk og bilags manipulation, da eksempelvis disse ansatte Nicolai Hansen og Casper Dam Olsen skjulte og løj lån på 4.328.000 dkk som hjemtaget og omlagt, på trods af dette aldrig havde eksisteret, da en anden af Jyske Banks ansatte Lars Aaquist, så i ond tro valgte at starte en rentebytte / rentesikring / rente swap af dette falske og påstået lån, begik Jyske Bank organiseret bedrageri.
Dette her er en opfordring og en udfordring til Jyske Banks direktion ved CEO Lars Stensgaard Mørch, der blev fyret fra Dansk Bank A/S som den øverste ansvarlige for hvidvaskning af 1.500.000.000.000 danske kroner, verdens største sag om hvidvaskning.
Anders Christian Dam ansatte herefter Lars Stensgaard Mørch som øverste dirktør i koncern direktion for Jyske Bank A/S
Mit personlige spørgsmål til Lars Stensgaard Mørch er om Jyske Bank ønsker at satse mere på at bedrage kunder som min virksomhed, eller om Jyske Bank ønsker at rette op, og fyre dem som er de ansvarlige for Jyske Banks omfattende svindel mod min tidligere virksomhed, og så vise Jyske Banks øvrige kunder hvad Jyske Bank står for.
JEG ØNSKER AT MØDES OG AT VI TALER SAMMEN OM DET JEG SIDEN 2016 HAR SKREVET OM HER I MIN PERSONLIGE DAGBOG. www.banknyt.dk
Har i nogle rettelser til det jeg har skrevet og sagt de seneste 7 år, så ring til mig på +4522227713 og aftal en gennemgang, så vi sammen kan rette op på eventuelle fejl eller misforståelser.
I MIN FORTÆLLING ER CASPER DAM OLSEN, NIKOLAJ HANSEN, JEANETT KOFOED-HANSEN NOGLE AF DE CENTRALE PERSONER SOM ER MEDVIRKENDE I MINE BØGER OM JYSKE BANKS FUNDAMENT OG FORRETNINGS METODER.
Alle 3 her er gentagende blevet inviteret til at blive interviewet til brug for bøgerne om, deres andel af Jyske Banks bedrageri, hverken Nicolai Hansen, Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen eller Casper Dam Olsen har svaret.
My task, as the one who has been exposed to fraud, by several of Jyske Bank’s employees together in union, my diary is to warn other Jyske Bank customers against trusting the Jyske Bank group and the bank’s cooperation partners as I mentioned here, and and other postings.
If Jyske Bank’s board of directors, management, legal department and your contributing friends believe that Jyske Bank A/S has not committed fraud and forgery, as I tell you in this videos.
Fraud and forgery which the Legal Director Martin Skosted-Nielsen has denied by telephone.
So listen to my call to Jyske Bank from 18 May 2021 again, or listen to a few of the YouTube videos again here from this link.
Otherwise admit and apologize for Jyske Bank’s many offences, that’s the only thing that matters.
If Jyske Bank doesn’t meet a victim like me, who stands up to the giant and says STOP NOW, then Jyske Bank will not change the bank’s disgusting business model.
In my opinion, Jyske Bank is a dangerous bank, and one you absolutely cannot trust.
25 February 2024. To Legal Director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen and CEO Lars Stensgaard Mørch Jyske Bank, I am simply writing the truth about the fraud Jyske Bank exposed my former company to, the choice is yours as to what else write.
You can just start by admitting and apologizing, for Jyske Bank’s violation of the Land Registration Act 11, and stop threatening me to keep my mouth shut about Jyske Bank’s violations of the law.
If Jyske Bank’s management does not understand what I here in my diary www.banknyt.dk writes just ask me.
So if you will have a personal meeting with me, we can solve your “Jyske Banks” problems, please remember that it is not me, who wants this war, but Jyske Bank, which itself has started, and still contributing to this story about Jyske Bank’s business against the customers, who have chosen to use Jyske Bank, that I have found is a lying bank.
I share here the latest summons, from 5 februar in this link 15 februar 2024. against the Danish Bank Jyske Bank, for violation of the law, more to follow.
04-02-2024. stævning af Jyske Bank Cvr. 17616617. i anerkendelsessøgsmål for overtrædelser af tinglysningslovens § 11, og afgift 1850 kr. Susanne Sørensen Jyske Bank s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk, 89894863 Servicecenter Silkeborg ved Susanne Sørensen, 89894863 s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk har overtrådt tinglysningsloven. find medarbejder.
05-02-2024. stævning Jyske Bank. 1850 kr. overtrædelses af love. sagsnr. BS-6300-2024-HEL. 04-02-2024. stævning af Jyske Bank Cvr. 17616617. i anerkendelsessøgsmål for overtrædelse af tinglysningslovens § 11, og afgift 1850 kr. Susanne Sørensen Jyske Bank s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk, 89894863 Servicecenter Silkeborg ved Susanne Sørensen, 89894863 s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk har overtrådt tinglysningsloven. find medarbejder.
READ HERE. Link about Jyske Bank.
My offer to Jyske Bank A/S, is that I can withdraw the just-initiated case for violation of the Land Registration Act Chase BS-6653/2024-VIB, when Jyske Bank admits that the Bank has violated the law.
Everything else I have said and written since 2016 is not, and will never be part of a settlement, as if not Jyske Bank gives me many more concessions, therefore it will be required that Jyske Bank’s management makes more concessions.
And only if that happens, I will be content to concentrate on the Books surrounding Jyske Bank’s offences.
Martin Skovsted-Nielsen you know, what i have said and written to you, do you have any questions, or something that you or anyone else in Jyske Bank have questions to, or something there want to be corrected, then you should call me at +4522227713. so we can solve small problems.
From my point of view, there is no proposal for a comprehensive solution or for a proposal for a comprehensive settlement, Jyske Bank wants from me, then it is concessions that must be on the table, so we are unlikely to reach the goal after Jyske Bank claims that I am lying , this conclusion is in connection with the bank’s denials and actions.
With reference to my emails, as this.
8. august 2023.
10. august 2023.
And my email 11. august 2023. and to the email by Martin Skovsted-Nielsen wrote on 11 August 2023 at 11.55.
The ball is still in Jyske Bank, and their threats of libel suit have no influence on my books about Jyske Bank’s business methods.
I rejected this email from Martin Skibsted-Nielsen with a proposal the same day 11 August 2023.
Read my email 12 august 2023.
I am a little late, in sharing a copy of the subpoena against Jyske Bank A/S, for by Susanne Soerensen as have made a violation of section 11 of the Land Registration Act.
Jyske Bank by the lawyers continues to deny, that some in Jyske Bank A/S have done something wrong, or that someone in Jyske Bank had lied at any time, such as here where, for example, Nicolai Hansen lies that the customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000 which Jysk Bank by Nicolai Hansen, in a letter to Jyske Bank has been informed, evidence for this is below in Photos.
You can read more about this, and much more in the books that I am writes on, and action is as shared here 31 December 2020, where Jyske Bank by mee wishes a happy New Year, a link is shared with Jyske Bank last 19 february 2024.
Jyske Bank had received a summons from the court, on February 21, 2024, the court writes that if Jyske Bank does not respond to this summons within 7 days, the court will sends a legal person, to deliver the summons “the case”, which is a recognition case for violation of the Land Registration Act.
Jyske Bank’s legal director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen announced by telephone on Tuesday 21 February, that the case would be dismissed, as I cannot have both a claim for recognition and a financial loss in a same case, to which I have replied that the claim will be changed to a pure claim for Acknowledgment of case concerning Jyske Bank’s violation of the Property Registration Act.
HERE IS A LINK TO THE SUMMONS DOCUMENT.
AND LINK TO DOCUMENT ATTACHED MY SUMMONS FROM JYSKE BANK.
When I think about all the offenses, that Denmark’s second largest #Bank, Jyske Bank A/S is demonstrably behind, and that the Bank neither regrets, nor wants to apologise, it shows after my opinion a clear picture of Jyske Bank’s foundation, which is anything else but honest and honorable.
That is why I have also made it quite clear to the members of Jyske Bank A/S, as well to the bord members and the management by Lars Stensgaard Mørch, Niels Erik Jacobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Trier Schleidt, and to Martin Skovsted-Nielsen, and many more.
It seems clear that Kromann Reumert wanted to cover up Jyske Bank’s use of, document forgery, fraud, mandate fraud, fraud, money laundering, by opposing that clients who are exposed to financial crimes carried out by Danish banks have the right to a fair trial.
As when partners and employees in Dansk Erhverv, Nævnes Hus, with Supreme Court judge Kurt Rasmussen and Horten lawyers, as well as Kromann Reumert lawyers have decided.
That it came to my attention that Lundgren’s lawyers withheld and concealed a several pleadings, in the company’s fraud case against the criminal Jyske Bank A/S.
Decided by the Danish lawyer community, by Kromann Reumert Parter,Jens Steen Jensen and the company’s board of directors/management, that have shown that Kromann Reumert lawyers do not believe that it is a violation of good legal practice, when lawyers such as Lundgren’s lawyers, withhold several pleadings in their clients’ cases, as in my case against the criminal Jyske Bank, where Jyske Bank, for example, by employed Lundgren’s lawyers, and that Lundgren’s lawyers afterwards, in bad faith hid, several pleadings from me, as a client i Lundgrens lawyers.
In short, Kromann Reumert and Horten lawyers do not believe, that their clients have any right to see some of the pleadings, that Kromann Reumert or Horten er become addicted to presents in a cases, where their clients have hired Kromann Reumert or Horten lawyers to represent their client i af case like my against a big Danish criminal Bank.
Kromann Reumert lawyers, and the board, have not wanted to respond to any inquiries, nor comment on anything that I have written on www.banknyt.dk.
If Kromann Reumert dares to respond to my inquiries, or wishes to comment on what I have written and which Kromann Reumert has read here, or elsewhere, then you are welcome to contact me to arrange a meeting to review my many shared emails and postings.
This also applies to Dansk Erhverv, Nævnenes Hus, with the Supreme Court, by judge Kurt Rasmussen.
These images have been shared by the Jyske bank car since 2016, and continue to be found online as a warning against organized crime in Denmark, but also as a warning against doing some kind of business with the mentioned companies, such as Horten lawyers, Lundgren lawyers, Kromann Reumert lawyers, Jyske Bank, DLA Piper lawyers, and many more.
You can contact me here +4522227713, or by email banknyt@gmail.com
greetings Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup.
I repeat again, if Jyske Bank has something they want me to correct, in what I have written since 2016, call me +4522227713.
And let’s meet to review what I have written and compare it with my documentation, if there are any mistakes or misunderstandings on my part, I will of course be happy to correct them.
But to think that Jyske Bank by threats, can silence me, after the fraud that the bank has exposed me and my company to, that is not going to happen, I refer again to my many years of inquiries that i have sendt or offered to Jyske Bank A/S.
That my books will exist, so that everyone may not be in doubt, that Jyske Bank’s employees are welcome to lie, without the bank’s lawyers and the management at Lars Stensgaard Mørch, Niels Erik Jacobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Trier Schleidt, and as Martin Skovsted-Nielsen necessarily not seeing anything wrong with lying, the bank will after all, just call it a mistake, if it is discovered.
I write facts about my personal experiences and experiences with having been a customer of a big Danish bank, where exploitation, manipulation of documents and lies were used to hide the cunning fraud, where Jyske Bank started fraud on December 30, 2008, when several employees together in union, chose to start with calculating interest on a loan of DKK 4,328,000 that never had existed LINK, but which Nicolai Hansen, in collaboration with Casper Dam Olsen, managed to lie about when I, as a customer was seriously ill after a major brain haemorrhage.
This has already been written after I had to fire Lundgren’s lawyers.
When there was a well-founded suspicion that Jyske Bank had bribed Lundgrens law firm to not present my accusations and claims against the Jyske Bank group at the return commission.
Link procedural document 27 oktober 2019.
.
Link 31 March 2023. The plaintiff’s comments in the accounts.
In my opinion, Jyske Bank’s employees have clearly taken advantage of the fact that, I had a large brain hemorrhage, and then could not remember, so that the employees as Nicolaj Hansen could lie in bad faith, that I as a customer have already received the loan of DKK 4,328,000
As Jyske Bank A/S since 30 December 2008. has calculated interest, which the Jyske Bank group therefore wanted to hide had not been taken home, therefore it was also extremely powerful for, among others, Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen to lie together about this loan.
From the beginning, it has been in power for Jyske Bank’s employees to lie directly about the customer having borrowed DKK 4,328,000 in order to cover up, that the Jyske Bank A/S group by Nicolai Hansen, Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen.
Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen and Nicolai Hansen, has helped Lars Aaquist to start an interest rate swap on DKK 4,328,000 for this alleged underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 for Jyske Bank’s Swap. “Lars Aaquist there today
is employed by Danske Bank A/S.”
The value of this fraudulent number is in the region of 3.5 million Danish kroner, which seemed to be the background for lying to the customer, to the Swedish Financial Institution Appeal Board and again to lie to the courts that this underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 has been taken home and later changed.
Jyske Bank succeeded in using several employees to hide this for 10 years, helped by the customer’s serious illness, which is why Jyske Bank demanded that the case be dismissed as out of date, as the fraud was not discovered within the first 3 years.
Jyske Bank on 31 December 2008 initiated an interest rate swap of DKK 4,328,000 for a loan that never existed, at this time there was not even an offer, yet Jyske Bank has set the amount to negative DKK 560,000 to close the interest rate swap, that this date alone is a historical fraud, carried out by several employees together in association.
Legal Director Martin Skovsted Nielsen has stated in February 2024 that he does not think it is lying when employees are not telling the truth.
At the same time, Martin Skovsted Nielsen threatened that Jyske Bank would bring a libel case against me for what I have written here in my diary www.banknyt.dk page, if I do not keep my mouth shut about Jyske Bank’s business, and delete everything I have written through them many years about Jyske Bank A/S’s way of conducting banking business, this is out of the question as it is material for the books I am writing on.
12 august 2023. TIL BØGERNE OM KORRUPTION OG 1 KRIMINEL BANK I DANMARK. : SE BEVISER FOR JYSKE BANKS BEDRAGERI HER. SE DE YOUTUBE VIDEOER SOM SIDEN 3. MAJ 2021. ER BLEVET DELT AF JYSKE BANKS FJENDE NR. 1. CARSTEN STORBJERG@JYSKEBANK. JYSKE BANKS FUNDAMENT.
Here is a completely different offer 6 May 2009, for a completely different project, which Jyske Bank employed Nicolai Hansen “as today is employed at Jyske Bank Hillerød Slotsgade 19.” but that Nicolai Hansen, who is 100% aware that I have not borrowed the DKK 4,328,000, chooses to lie in February 2010, probably to hide that Jyske Bank A/S on 30 December 2008 started fraud against the customer’s company.
Jyske Bank itself believes that it is neither lying nor fraud, as it is obviously normal for the bank’s employees to call more lies more mistakes.
The bank’s lawyers do not want to admit the way I and my company have been treated, clearly is not a rarity, but rather Jyske Bank’s foundation.
An offer of DKK 4,328,000, which was rejected and expired on 20 November 2008.
The fact that the offer has lapsed is made absolutely clear to the Jyske Bank Helsingoer branch by Nicolai Hansen.
However, this did not stop Nicolai Hansen from lying, which I claim is in bad faith, my diary www.banknyt.dk is important for my overall experience of being a customer of a big lying Danish bank.
Nicolai Hansen has subsequently moved from Jyske Bank Helsingør to Jyske Bank Hilleroed branch, Slotsgade 19, 3400,
Here, Nicolai Hansen lies together with Casper Dam Olsen that the underlying loan for the swap has been restructured.
Nicolai Hansen has admitted that he wrote the email in collaboration with Casper Dam Olsen.
Both are permanent employees of Jyske Bank Hilleroed Slotsgade 19, 3400,
Back to Jyske Bank’s violation of section 11 of the Property Registration Act
Of course, for 3 years now I have requested the Jyske Bank group to admit and apologize for having deleted my private mortgage deed without my consent, as the law requires, but Jyske Bank refuses to admit violations of the law and Jyske Bank also refuses to apologize for the bank’s violations of the law, I has therefore sued the lying Jyske Bank myself, the proceedings of which I am sharing here on 25 February.
A recognition case for violation of the Land Registration Act, which Legal Director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen denies is some violation of Danish legislation, and which Martin says is a case Jyske Bank will have rejected.
I am thinking again of when Supreme Court judge Kurt Rasmussen, and partners Birgitte Frølund from Horten lawyers as well as Jens Steen Jensen from Kromann Reumert and Deputy Director from Dansk Erhverv Henrik Hyltoft, ther in the bar council decided that the clients for Danish lawyers, does not decide on their own lawsuit, and decided at same time that it is not a breach of good legal practice, when the client’s lawyers withhold several pleadings from their client, nor would they hand over a pleading to the client upon request.
Refers to the complaint about the corrupt Lundgren lawyers. LINK.
LINK Read the case, summons, and see attachments in the case against Jyske #Bank, the district court, Viborg. SEE SHARED YOUTUBE VIDEOS AT THIS LINK.