13-11-2018. the court writes to Lundgrens Dan terkildsen that Annex 18 is used. and asks Lundgrens to confirm that the client’s earlier submitted documents can be removed, we write to Lundgrens that they can not, we will never get a reply back – Eksempel på hvad der ikke er en overtrædelse af god advokat skik, efter advokat nævnets afgørelse i klagen 2020-1932. over Lundgrens advokater.

In the most prominent money-laundering case, Raul Arashukov, an adviser to the head of a Gazprom subsidiary, was detained on an allegation of stealing Rbs30bn ($460m) worth of gas. His son Rauf Arashukov was also detained. Father and son deny the allegations and remain in detention. While this money-laundering case is unlikely to have led to Monday’s top executive departures, it adds to the unsettled atmosphere at the gas producer. “We are talking about full-scale changes,” a London-based analyst said of the executive departures. “It is unlikely they were linked to the Arashukovs’ case. “But perhaps this case simply exhausted the patience at the top regarding the company’s management.” Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen,

13-11-2018.
The court writes to Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen
that Annex 18 is used. and asks Lundgrens to confirm that the client’s earlier submitted documents can be removed, we write to Lundgrens that they can not, we will never get a reply back

20-03-2019. S.1-4.
Procedure B. this chooses Lundgrens by Partner Dan Terkildsen to keep hidden from their client, we get it after Lundgrens 25-09-2019 gets fired, on suspicion of bribery.
–
Please note that Lundgren’s Attorneys have not sent a copy of their client
.
Petition B. 20-03-2019.
.
Petition C. 27-08-2019.
.
and

Petition 2. 02-09-2019
.
Just as Lundgren has also withheld several other court documents to their client, such as the court’s letter of 08-01-2019, where the court states that they disregard Appendix 28-101. with the client’s allegations from 28-12-2018
.
At the same time that Lundgrens is working for the defendant in the case.
.
And Lundgren’s attorneys have worked against everything that can be known as good attorney practice.
.
And have no control over the document number, submitted documents without covering the BBC by mail.
.
And otherwise, annexed 09-07-2019 presented without informing the court why, or notifying the client.
.
This case showed that the Danish legal community is under pressure from both Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager and not least Jyske Bank.