Page 1 of 43. 27-08-2019 to Lundgren’s lawyers.

The letter is just one of many, in which we repeatedly ask, Lundgren’s lawyers, such as the clerk Emil and Mette-Marie and Dan Terkildsen, to present the client’s, ie our fraud allegations against Jyske Bank.

We refer to the SMSs in the letter, with allegations sent to Emil, but which none of Lundgren’s attorneys would provide.

In the letter, the client refers to SMS 23-08-2019. and writes that Emil from Lundgrens has not responded to their client’s SMS

/

And also refers to Mette-Marie in Lundgrens.

Which in turn raised our allegations 10-12-2018, to present the client’s claims to the court 18-12-2018.

–

IT IS A FACT.

That Mette-Marie chooses with Dan Terkildsen, not to submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank, in the closing petition 18-12-2018

There Mette-Marie is doing the same thing on December 18 and will be sent to court.

/

IT IS A FACT

That Lundgren’s attorneys 02/09/2019 make and present litigation 2, exactly 4 weeks before the scheduled hearing 30 September

In this document, Lundgrens also did not include any of the client’s fraud claims.

Just as it is a fact that Emil does not share Process Letter 2 with the client who first gets a copy, after Lundgrens has been fired, on suspicion that Lundgren’s lawyers are corrupt.

–

The main claim is still Appendix 1. a change of interest from 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000.

for an underlying loan that does NOT exist.

That Annex 1 is false is said 1,000 times.

Just this little detail, Lundgren’s lawyers fail to present to the court.

/

IT IS A FACT

That Lundgrens, by Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie and Emil, repeatedly stated that the SWAPPEN of 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. by the client is alleged to be false.

When Lundgren’s attorneys present the case, as if Appendix 1. is agreed and approved.

Then, directly directly against the client’s instructions, bring the case as a case of bad advice, against the client’s claims.

Then it must be Lundgrens and Jyske Bank who must have agreed this.

–

And why doesn’t Lundgrens send the client a copy of litigation 2.

Clear that the client thinks that Jyske Bank must have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, in order not to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank

Whether it is Bribery that happened by the Return Commission, or in a fee, hidden in some way, the parties to Lundgren’s lawyers must be able to explain.

Like when Jyske Bank hires Lundgrens for a large million tasks.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW IF LUNDGREN’S ADVOCATES HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED?

SO YOU MUST ASK

LUNDGRENS LAWYER’S

AND

JYSKE BANK’S MANAGEMENT

See the danish lawyers and banks during fraud.

Although the big Danish banks make a lot of money on money laundering.

Then Danish banks like Jyske Bank can also make documents false,
and fraud crimes in the million class.

In Denmark, a customer has found evidence that some Danish banks, both using counterfeiting, as well as lying to the court, to disappoint in legal matters.

Jyske Bank’s customer was surprised that Danish banks like Jyske Bank appear to be using bribery in the hunt for unjustified income, which will result in a loss to the customer.

Although Danish politicians, government officials, police, the state know very well that some Danish banks have a very difficult time understanding and complying with current legislation, the state nevertheless instigates the many criminal conditions that Danish banks are behind.

No Danish banks will be prosecuted

Ask yourself why, the management of Danish banks has not been sentenced to prison sentences when there is fraud.

And that the largest banks knowingly give customers bad advice, to increase the bank’s fortunes

We even have a fight against Jyske Bank, which has made millions, to expose the customer to gross fraud.

And in our case, Jyske Bank has also used bribery, in the form of a return commission to Lundgren’s lawyers, for a large million advisory tasks.

Jyske Bank writes to the court that the bank strongly distances itself from using Bribery.

BUT IT IS A FACT.

The fact that Jyske Bank hires Lundgren’s lawyers, shortly afterwards, Lundgren’s lawyers were hired to present the client’s fraud allegations against JYSKE BANK.

So it seemed clear that the management of Jyske Bank is behind the bribery of client’s former lawyers from Lundgrens

Not to present the customer’s charges against Jyske Bank for million fraud.

When the Attorney General refuses to allow banks such as Jyske Bank to investigate charges of fraud and document fraud.

Then it is possible that the members of Freemasonry are behind.

That the Danish state, which during the economic crisis, has supported several Danish banks with many auxiliary parks.

So, afterwards, they don’t care what Danish banks do about illegal conditions, one wonders.

We ourselves have had to hire a new lawyer for the third time, after the Danish bank we have sued, and charges of fraud, are suspected of having bought and bribed our first two lawyers, not to show the court, our evidence or some of our allegations against Jyske Bank.

READ ON BANKNYT DK
AND EVALUATE YOURSELF ABOUT:

THE DANISH BANK JYSKE BANK HAS PAID BIRTH TO LUNDGREN’S ADVOCATES.

NOT TO PRESENT OUR CLAIMS TO JYSKE BANK FOR MILLION FRAUD BUSINESS

Otherwise, ask Lundgren’s lawyers and JYSKE BANK in Denmark

WHY THE CASE IS HERE