Bribery is not only a problem of Danish society. When a client hires Lundgrens Advokater, to file a case of fraud, executed against a Danish bank customer in Jyske Bank. And the client clearly and clearly tells Lundgren’s attorneys that the fraud crime was committed by Jyske Bank, and this is done with the Group management’s knowledge, and certainly contributes to the client in the case BS-402/2015-VIB When the customer saw over 1 year. after Lundgren’s lawyer b occurred and shortly after the lawyers had been hired to file a fraud case against Jyske Bank. Discover that even the same Lundgren’s lawyer company, has been employed by the Jyske Bank Group, in a trade for DKK 600 million. And the client also discovers that Lundgren’s lawyers have countered that some of their client’s claims were brought to court. When Lundgrens directly against the client’s instructions, does not present any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank, which the client has many times given Lundgrens Advokater clear instructions to submit. What do you call it if Jyske Bank did not pay Lundgren’s Return commission by giving Lundgren’s lawyer partner company a million orders. Should Lundgren’s Attorneys not be reported to the lawyer mentioned, as a total lawyer’s house, since Lundgren’s partner has all taken oaths. paragraph 10.4 of Lundgren’s set of rules. When it comes to violation of good attorney practice, and possible receipt of return commission in the form of million work for Jyske Bank, neither Lundgrens nor Jyske Bank’s Executive Board should hide the truth when the client only seeks the truth about Jyske Bank’s real foundation.