Known Danish law office Lundgrens suspected of receiving return commission, of large Danish bank Jyske bank, read the customers story, about trying to be talking with the president CEO Anders Dam, plise talk with os. This is not fun.
Lundgrens advokater skriver de er personligt optaget af din forretning. – Spørgsmålet er hvilken forretning Lundgrens advokater mener, når Lundgrens vælge at samarbejde med modparten Jyske Bank A/S Hvor Klienten beder Lundgrens advokater om at fører en svig sag imod Jyske Bank. / Her kommer sandheden om Jyske Banks fortatte svigforretninger imod kunde, og Lundgrens advokater der modarbejder klientens instrukser.
Can Danish Banks as Jyske bank be trusted ?
Fraud and False case against Denmark’s second largest Danske Bank, is also about corruption, stabbing, abuse of power, exploitation and political friends.
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. Lundgrens advokater er mere end velkommen til at svare på vores spørgsmål 1-14 De er lidt nede på siden her 07-02-2020 Link More in English under the Danish text. / Hvis en advokat modarbejder deres klient. Som det her i sagen er sket. Og det også er forsøgt skjult, frem til Klienten selv opdager modstridende interesse konflikter. Mellem Lundgrens Partner Selskab og deres klient Jyske Bank A/S nok april 2018 Lundgrens må gerne selv skrive den rigtige dato og hvem fra ledelsen i Jyske Bank der har givet Lundgrens advokater denne her million opgave til Ring sms +4522227713 så retter vi det. Samt Mellem Lundgrens advokater og Storbjerg Erhverv i sagen mod Jyske Bank A/S for svig ? / Hvor Lundgrens advokater i vores svig sag mod Jyske Bank A/S Dirækte imod “Lundgrens klient” vores instrukser, væger at ingurer vores “klientens” svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S bliver fremlagt for domstolene. Og når Lundgrens kontinuerligt, gør det direkte modsatte af, hvad klienten skriver og siger til Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie og Emil fra Lundgrens advokater. Så ved Partner Dan Terkildsen 100 % godt at Lundgrens Partner Selskab, skal fremlægge deres klients svig påstande imod Jyske Bank A/S. Men alligevel vælger Lundgrens Partner, dirækte imod kundens instrukser, ikke at fremlægge nogle af klientens svig og falsk påstande imod Jyske Banks bestyrelse, og Jyske Bank A/S. Hvad kaldes sådan en advokat virksomhed som Lundgrens så ? Dårlig, Rådden eller bare korrupt. ? / Lundgrens advokater er mere end velkommen til at svare på vores spørgsmål 1-14 De er lidt nede på siden her 07-02-2020 Link er øverst oppe / Som vi klienten har skrevet kontinuerligt, at Lundgrens skulle fremlægge vores sag mod Jyske Bank A/S som svig. Eller har vi noget sted, i alle de dokumenter, vi kontinuerligt har overbragt til Lundgrens advokater, eller måske telefonisk, glemt at bede Lundgrens fremlægge vores sag mod Jyske Bank A/S som svig og falsk. Man kunne jo tro det ikke er skrevet noget sted, siden Lundgrens ikke har fremlagt retten vores påstande. Kan du fortælle hvorfor ? / Hvad er det vi beder Lundgrens advokater om at fremlægge mod Jyske Bank A/S Hvis noget af det vi har skrevet til Lundgrens, og bet Lundgrens Fremlægde kan misforstås, så er det utroligt Lundgrens advokater ikke har stillet et enste spørgsmål. Vi kun kun mundtlig fra 18-12-2018 Hvor Mette-Marie ringer kl. Ca. 17.00 Og siger at det er nogle grove anklager mod Jyske Bank A/S Mette-Marie siger at Dan Terkildsen er i partner møde og skal godkende det Mette-Marie vil skrive til retten samme aften. “Altså Lundgrens advokater kender og har fået vores påstande mod Jyske bank A/S.” Lundgrens vælger selv dirækte imod kundens instrukser, ikke at fremlægge nogle af klientens påstande. / Vi har det også kun fra Emil At Lundgrens ved og har forstået Hvilket 9 vidner vi ønsker at indkalde Lundgrens ved Emil vælger Det er Dan Terkildsen der står bag og bestemmer hvad Emil skal, da Emil er under oplæring. Så når Dan Terkildsen kun, vil have at Emil skrive 2 af disse vidner på 02-09-2019 Iøvrigt de 2 som Jyske Bank selv har bet om, ca. 6 måneder tidligere. (Ved vi først efter Lundgrens er blevet fyret) / Emil har for Lundgrens Advokater også telefonisk, bekræftet at han godt har forstået at sagn handler om svig. Alligevel fremlægger Lundgrens “Emil” den 2 september 2019 intet af det vi gentagne gange har skrevet. Lundgrens advokater har således fjernet 7 vidner, fra Klientens vidne liste, uden Klientens vidne. / Lundgrens fremlægger selv 2. september 2019 et svarkrift. Uden at have medtaget klients påstande. Når Klienten, også har skrivet til Lundgrens og sender en sms til Emil, hvor Lundgrens advokater får klare instrukser om at, Lundgrens intet må fremlægge, uden klienten har godkendt det. Og Lundgrens advokater så alligevel, dirækte i mod Klientens instrukser, fremlægger Lundgrens påstande 2 september 2019. Uden at sende Klienten en kopi. Uden at få Klientens godkendelse. Uden at medtage Klientens svig og falsk påstande. Og dirækte imod det Klienten gentagne gange har skrevet og sagt til Lundgrens advokater. Som at Bilag 1. Swappen på 4.328.000 dkk fra 16-07-2008 er falsk. / Alligevel fremlægger Lundgrens advokater noget andet overfor retten. Og skriver 02-09-2019 At kunden har indgået denne her Swap med Jyske Bank 16-07-2008. / Helt ærligt selv om Klienten er ordblind og ret dårlig til at skrive. Så må Lundgrens advokater være i ond tro, og sikkert også blevet købt af Jyske Bank, for ikke at fremlægge nogle af de svig påstande mod Jyske Bank vi gentagne gange har skrevet / Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens, mener vel ikke at Lundgrens advokater er korrupte. Og bestemt ikke har taget mod bestikkelse fra Jyske Bank A/S, skjult som returkommission. Tænker at Lundgrens Partner Selskab selv mener, at fordi Lundgrens Partner Selskab, har modtaget et stort million beløb af Jyske Banks bestyrelse. Så er betalingen alene givet for at, Lundgrens skulle rådgive Jyske Banks Koncern, omkring salget af 6 ejendomme for ca. 600.000.000. dkk Og denne million aftale mellem Jyske Bank A/S og Lundgrens Partner Selskab. har intet med at Lundgrens Partner Selskab ikke har fremlagt nogle af vores “Klientens” svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S / Og mon ikke Lundgrens Partner Selskab selv mener, at Jyske Banks million betaling til Lundgrens advokater. Ingen indflydelse har, harft på det, at Lundgrens Partner Selskab, ikke har fremlagt nogle af deres anden klient “vores” svig påstande imod Jyske Banks Koncern og bestyrelsen. / Det at Advokaterne, som her Lundgrens partner selskab, så også arbejder, har arbejdet for modparten Jyske Bank A/S Hvilket Lundgrens advokater har lykkes at holde skjult for deres anden klient, os i over 16 måneder. Er sådan en advokat virksomhed så ikke korrupt. eller HVAD MENER I Dan Terkildsen Lundgrens Anders Christian Dam Jyske Bank Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager / Uanset hvor mange penge Bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank A/S har betalt Lundgrens advokat partner selskab for deres ydelser. Og hvis Lundgrens advokaters sammenarbejde med Jyske Bank A/S Har påvirket Lundgrens dømmekraft i deres arbejde med at fremlægge vores svig sagen imod Jyske Bank A/S Og derfor er vores svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S ikke af Lundgrens advokater blevet fremlagt for retten. Uanset om det er venne tjenester, mellem nogle af Danmarks største banker Jyske Bank og landets største advokatfirmaer Lundgrens. Hvis der ikke er tale om bestikkelse og korruption hvad er det så. Dette sker i Danmark absolutte top af samfundet, og disse advokater “Lundgrens” som skulle sikker at loven bliver overholdt. Og så sikker at der findes retssikkerhed også for de små, når det danske politi ved Statsadvokaten har nægtet at Jyske Bank bliver efterforsket. Statsadvokaten mener ligesom Jyske Banks advokater, Lund Elmer Sandager, som sagsøger flere gange har taget i at have løjet i retsforhold, hvilket retten er oplyst, og nu fremlagt retten 28-10-2019 / Når danskerne bliver udsat for svig, udført af Danmarks største og mest magtfulde virksomheder, og det bliver politianmeldt. Men hverken politiet eller statsadvokaten, vil tale med anmælder, der har fremlagt en mappe med flere beviser mod Jyske Bank A/S for overtrædelse af straffeloven, og blot svare at Politiet ikke mener at Jyske Bank A/S vil blive straffet. Og anmælder så af Staten, statsadvokaten henvises til selv at føre en svig sag mod Jyske Bank. / En sag som nu både Rødstenen advokater i Århus samt Lundgrens advokater København direkte har modarbejdet blev fremlagt for de danske domstole. Hvordan synes i så om retssikkerheden i Danmark. Hvis nogle i Danmark udsatte Jyske Bank for det Jyske Bank koncernen har lavet imod os, så sad de fængsle for længst. Mvh familien Skaarup fra Hornbaek 0045-22227713
Perhaps Lundgren’s lawyers have not understood what the Client has clearly written. – 3.1 Lundgrens acts on the basis of and in accordance with the client’s instructions, and the client and Lundgrens regularly agree on the legal assistance and scope of the assignment as well as the client’s and others’ involvement. First Lundgren’s attorneys have not written anything that some of their clients’ fraud allegations against Jyske Bank are directly illegal, that is, in accordance with the provisions of the law to present to the court. 🙂 Lundgrens writes they are entitled to refuse to comply with an instruction if this would violate legislation or other rules, e.g. rules of good practice. 2nd If it is against good practice for Lundgren’s lawyers to stop Jyske Bank’s fraud cases against Lundgren’s former client, then Lundgren’s lawyers have not written anything about it. Lundgrens it is for fun laughs Didn’t you like that Dan Terkildsen 🙂
Perhaps Lundgren’s lawyers have not understood what the Client has clearly written. – 3.1 Lundgrens acts on the basis of and in accordance with the client’s instructions, and the client and Lundgrens regularly agree on the legal assistance and scope of the assignment as well as the client’s and others’ involvement. First Lundgren’s attorneys have not written anything that some of their clients’ fraud allegations against Jyske Bank are directly illegal, that is, in accordance with the provisions of the law to present to the court. 🙂 Lundgrens writes they are entitled to refuse to comply with an instruction if this would violate legislation or other rules, e.g. rules of good practice. 2nd If it is against good practice for Lundgren’s lawyers to stop Jyske Bank’s fraud cases against Lundgren’s former client, then Lundgren’s lawyers have not written anything about it. Lundgrens it is for fun laughs Didn’t you like that Dan Terkildsen 🙂
Direktør & Chief Operating Officer MARTIN KIRKEGAARD DIREKTØR & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Bestyrelse MICHAEL ALSTRØM FORMAND. THOMAS KRÆMER BESTYRELSESMEDLEM. NINA RINGEN BESTYRELSESMEDLEM. TOBIAS VIETH BESTYRELSESMEDLEM. NIELS WIVE KJÆRGAARD ADVOKAT (H) Former client / Client asks Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. – First. Has the Jyske Bank Group accused Lundgren’s lawyers not to submit your client’s fraud charges against Jyske Bank A/S – 2nd. Has Lundgren’s lawyer partner company taken a million orders from Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors / Management shortly after Lundgren’s February 5, 2018 was assigned to file a fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S – Third. Now, Lundgren’s lawyers do not intend to deny their cooperation with Jyske Bank’s Group management well. It’s just a very simple YES or NO. – 4th. It was Lundgren’s lawyer partner company who, after February 5, 2018, contacted Management in Jyske Bank A/S – 5th. Or was it the management of the Jyske Bank Group There, directly and even contact Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, to offer Lundgren’s lawyers a million deal. If yes Who in the Jyske Bank Group contact Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, with an offer to advise Jyske Bank Group management on the bank’s sale of properties for DKK 600,000,000. Who in Lundgren’s lawyer partner company has Jyske Bank’s Group contact, to get Lundgren’s lawyers to help Jyske Bank Group. – 6. Therefore, Lundgren’s lawyer Partner Company has not submitted any of their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S ! If we have not been clear enough, what have we not explained well enough? More when the next customers Lundgrens files more cases against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud. Hope this is not too difficult questions for Lundgren’s lawyers. Such questions may well be answered by the Lundgrens Board of Directors. So that’s why dear Lundgrens You can use the same number 0045 22227713 The same number in has us hidden under. Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. You must very well explain. + Don’t use Rödstenen or Lundgren’s attorneys, as they may seem to be bought or bribed by the opposing party, to counteract your case, to disappoint in legal matters. If you want to try a fake law firm, try contacting Lundgren’s lawyer partner company they took our ass and started working for the counterparty Jyske Bank, while Lundgrens has done their best to hurt our case against Jyske Bank for fraud. + But if you need your lawyer to lie directly in legal matters, to disappoint in the legal relationship, we recommend that you contact Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys, ask Partner Philip Baruch, here they have their own law book. See the few appendices and ask Lundgrens and Jyske Bank if a return commission has been used, so as not to present any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S
Fired lawyer becomes new partner in Lundgrens Lawyer and partner, whom BB chose to dismiss in connection with the much-discussed dividend tax case, has been taken to grace at the law firm Lundgrens. The department head doubts that ongoing investigation at the Law Council will burden the new employee.
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. – Her er bilagene der stiller store spørgsmålstegn ved Om Lundgrens advokat partner selskab har hjulpet Jyske Bank mod deres egen klient Derfor beder vi om at få hjælp, Kære Henrik Høpner 04-09-2019 prøv at hjælpe os med at finde ud af om vi er udsat for bedrageri, eller vi er dumme som i DUM DUMMERE og DUMMEST Men hvem ønsker at have hæderlige banker. De er svære at finde. Nu handler det om Lundgrens partnerselskab hvori Dan Terkildsen er Partner. Og om lundgrens forbindelser til Jyske bank A/S som synes at være en god forretning. Hvad Lundgrens så har givet Jyske Bank til modydelse, hvis der ikke ligefrem er at ville møde op i retten uden at have fremlagt vores påstande, for så at tabe. Ja så ved vi ikke hvad ellers det kan være. Spørg Lundgrens hvorfor de ikke fremlage vores påstande som de er blevet ansat til. Om Dan Terkildsen er mod alt hvad Konservative måtte stå for. ? Dan Terkildsen har for Lundgrens Direkte modarbejdet klients retssikkerhed.Når Lundgrens kæmper imod deres klients sag kommer for retten. Kæmper Lundgrens advokater realt i mod retssikkerheden. DEN UAFHÆNGIGE STATSMAGT Ved ikke at ville fremlægge klienten sag for domstolen. Er det sådanne medlemmer Konservative ønsker. Alle medlemmer af de konservative se her hvordan Dan Terkildsen modarbejder retssikkerheden i at ske fyldest. ved tilsyneladende at varetage modparten Her Jyske banks interesser Dan Terkildsen er tæt knyttet til toppen i konservative, hvor vi formoder at Dan Terkildsen har haft politisk indflydelse, på den konservative politiske holdning til landes love. Jyske Banks Koncernchef og Bestyrelse. Er i åben krig med lille bank kunde. Som påstår at Jyske bank A/S står bag million bedrageri Hvilket kunden selv må fremlægge for domstolen 28-10-2019 Efter som Lundgren advokatpartnerselskab sammen har valgt Direkte at modarbejde klienten, for i stedet at hjælpe Danmarks næststørste bank, Jyske bank i at kunne fortsætte svigforeting mod bankens kunde. – CEO Anders Dam står fast, Jyske Banks kunde skal i tyve år, betale 5,32 %, i renter af 4.328.000 DKK Ved en rente swap, på 4.328.000 DKK som Jyske Banks ansatte i afdelingen på Vesterbrogade har lavet 16-07-2008 Og det uden at der 16-07-2008 er nogle aftale med kunden. En falsk SWAP på 4.328.000 kr. der har en værdi på mindst 2.500.000 dkk for Jyske bank. og som bliver et tab for kunden, kaldes lovmæssig for bedrageri. Jyske banks direktion er ligeglade. Da Jyske Bank har et stort politisk netværk, gennem bankens bestyrelse og deres kontakter. Som Jyske Banks medarbejdere, i et årti usandt har fortalt kunden At er den Swap, der er lavet 15-07-2008. Til det lån på 4.328.000 DKK som Jyske Banks mange advokater og ansatte har påstået deres kunde skulle have hjemtaget. Og senere så omlagt. Alt dette mens kunden har ligget syg efter en hjerneblødning. Lundgrens skulle fremlægge de originale syge papir fra fra Hillerød sygehus Dette ville Lundgrens ikke. Lundgrens ville slet ikke fremlægge kundens påstande. Mette-Marie ringer sent 18-12-2018 Og siger der er nogle grove beskyldninger vi kommer med, imod Jyske Bank A/S Hvortil vi siger men det er jo fakta. Lundgrens fremlægger ingen af vores påstande, og arbejder som de selv vil uden om klientens. Kan sige at Lundgrens fører en sag, som ikke er den sag Lundgrens er blevet antaget til. Hvilket Lundgrens vil have 185.000 dkk for. Lundgrens har nægtet at tilbagebetale de penge vi har overført, som Dan Terkildsen skriver, så har Lundgrens lavet et stort stykke arbejde. Noget som klienten ikke kan få øje på. Vi har heldigvis taget billeder med telefon, af sygejournal, på Lundgrens kontor før Mette Marie Nielsen fik dem, før 18-12-2018 Med klare INSTRUKSER på at fremlægge alt den 18-12-2018 Lundgrens advokater Mette-Marie Nielsen Påstår nu telefonske 18-12-2018 kl 17-18 at det kan skade vores sag, at fremlægge bevis for at kunden i perioden 2009-2015 led af hukommelses besvær. Vi har derfor måtte fremlægge disse bilag i ringe kvalitet, da Lundgrens advokater ikke har afleveret vores bilag retur, som vi bad Dan Terkildsen om, i det samme brev hvor vi fryer Lundgrens advokater, efter mistanke om at være blevet bestukket. Efterfølgende siger Dan Terkildsen 13-08-2019 at vi måske godt kan bruge sygehusjournaler Dan Terkildsen der er meget manipulerende, føler han ville vildlede os til at stole på ham. Dan der ikke vil gentage vores påstande, siger han er ikke en papegøje. Og siger han vil komme med de nasti ting i Viborg, uden dog på mødet 13-08 at sige hvad de nasty ting var. Altså Lundgrens ved Partner Dan Terkildsen Ved måske ikke at man ikke kan komme med noget i en sag, hvis det ikke først er er fremlagt. Men det er jo som vi tror retsplejeloven er. Dan Terkildsen må jo vide hvad han gør. Vi føler dog at Dan Terkildsen modarbejdede at vores sag overhovedet bliver fremlagt. Om Lundgrens og Dan Terkildsen er blevet bestukket til ikke at fremlægge vores sag. Det er jo et job for bagmandspolitiet at finde ud af. De kunne jo undersøge Jyske Banks topledelse og Ledelsen i Lundgrens Og gerne spørge os på 004522227713 Kapitel 2 Politiets opgaver § 2. Politiet har til opgave 1) at forebygge strafbare forhold 3) at bringe strafbar virksomhed til ophør samt efterforske og forfølge strafbare forhold Men vi har jo også opdaget at Lundgrens var gået i seng med Jyske Bank A/S kort efter vi har antaget Lundgrens. med i seng mener vi at Lundgrens vælger at arbejde for Jyske bank A/S
Why is the Danish state not intervening? the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Justice, the police, the Ministry of State, the Parliament. Everyone knows very well that Jyske bank is doing Fraud here. But ok if Denmark wants to allow Danish banks to make money washing, fraud, and which now also seemed to be about bribery, to keep the case out of court. We ask you what do you think this looks like? Has Jyske bank bribed the client’s lawyer Lundgrens, in this way to disappoint in legal matters? The client does not give up, even after probably 2 corrupt law firms, Jyske bank’s customer has changed lawyer at the beginning of November, for 3 time since 2015. The “3” time must be the course of happiness, we hope that Jyske bank will come to an understanding soon. And say sorry, we have not shown that there were any small problems.
Sund fornuft er at vi taler sammen, og finder en løsning 🙂 – på værdikæden side. 33. Den måde vi betjener kunderne i jyske bank på, derfor har alle vores handler betydning. Jyske Banks Værdier er. Helhedssyn og sund fornuft Åben og hæderlig Anderledes Handlekraftig og vedholdende – Logo Gør en forskel Jyske Bank går nye veje til fordel for kunderne
Alle ved jo udemærket godt at Jyske bank her laver Bedrageri, men ok hvis Danmark ønsker at tillade de Danske banker laver penge vask, Bedrageri, og som nu også syntes at omhandle bestikkelse, for at holde sagen ude af retten.
Vi spørger dig hvad du synes dette her ligner, har Jyske bank bestukket kundes advokat Lundgrens, for på den måde at skuffe i retsforhold, ?
Kunden giver ikke op, selv efter nok 2 korrupte advokat virksomheder, siden 2015 så har Jyske banks kunde i begyndelsen af november skiftet advokat.
In Denmark, active and passive bribery between business associations is punishable by section 299 of the Penal Code with up to 4 years in prison. Its scope is not fully clarified in practice, as it is formally addressed to “the one who is in charge of another’s property affairs”.
Upon closer reflection, the plaintiff is not in doubt. Lundgren’s attorneys at Partner Dan Terkildsen must also be called as a witness. The client wants to have Lundgrens confirm How many times Lundgrens has been asked to submit client’s claims against Jyske Bank for fraud and false So Lundgren’s lawyers in court can explain why, on October 28, the client had to present their allegations against Jyske Bank When Lundgren’s attorneys have been instructed for more than 30 times to present the client’s allegations and summon witnesses on whom the client may also write. In this way, Lundgren’s lawyers can help to clarify whether Jyske Bank has really bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to keep the client’s claims against Jyske Bank out of court.
Regarding whether Jyske Bank has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, in the form of a return commission. For this reason, through a collaboration between Jyske Bank and Lundgrens, not to present the client’s claims against Jyske Bank.
/ Then it is a FACT First Lundgrens gets our case against Jyske Bank on February 5, 2018. 2nd Lundgrens enters Third Lundgrens check the website www.BANKNYT.dk April 16, 2018. 4th Lundgrens then enters into a million cooperation with Jyske Bank. 5th Just as it is the FACT that Lundgrens will be kicked out on 25 September 2019 for the period 5 February to Lundgrens. At least 30 times have been informed of the allegations. And have been given direct INSTRUCTION, to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank, without following any of the client’s instructions. 🙁 It should be investigated by the police whether Lundgren’s lawyers have been bribed / paid by Jyske Bank A / S And who at Jyske Bank has approved contacting Lundgren’s lawyers around March May 2018, to advise Jyske Bank on a transaction for around DKK 600 million. Just as a study on Jyske Bank has given Lundgren’s other tasks, and which. Dan Terkildsen from Lundgrens has not wanted to answer the client’s questions, about the cooperation between the parties Lundgrens and Jyske Bank. / If Lundgren’s lawyers are a reputable law firm. Then the management of Lundgren himself contacts the police and asks them to investigate Lundgrens
The suspicion that some of the partners have been dishonest towards their customer / small client ..
/
This is an invitation to Lundgrens and Jyske Bank.
Now ask the police to investigate
About Jyske Bank bribing Lundgrens to counteract their client’s case against Jyske Bank and the management.
The CEO of Anders Christian Dam is probably very scared, for the small customer who accuses Anders Dam of complicity in Jyske Bank’s continuing million fraud Klik and Read 30-09-2019 – – Klik and Read 03-10-2019 Why does the customer suspect that Jyske Bank uses Bribery to disappoint in legal matters? – – The customer himself has to make the final reply on 28-10-2019 and submit their claims to the court. – – Why else does Anders Dam meet as the mighty manager and talk about the evidence against Jyske Bank for gross fraud or fraudulent conduct, which is now presented by the customer himself in the case. – If Anders Christian Dam is just a lousy coward who leads a criminal organization, or has the client misunderstood something, that is what we have been trying to figure out since May 2016. – – Dear Anders Christian Dam Call us on 004522227713 And tell us if we have been wrong, we do not want the case against Jyske Bank for fraud if we have misunderstood the group’s reasonable intentions, and there is no talk at all and neither fraud nor false. – Then you should not wake up Anders Dam and answer us. And if we are right in that, Jyske Bank exposes us to fraud, and you Anders Dam as manager of Jyske Bank are aware of it, without wanting to stop it, then you should leave the board Anders Dam, along with the rest of the board of Jyske Bank. – – If the customer is right Anders Dam, then admit, and give a public apology for the entire group management, and sorry for Jyske Bank’s fraud. – – The fact that Dan Terkildsen told Lundgrens, that Philip Baruch would agree that Jyske Bank would not complain :-(. Did you think that was enough, when we talk about scams? Anders Dam. – – We do not want the case agents the Jyske Bank management like you Anders Dam want it, but we also know, that it is an apparent criminal organization that we are up against. – In 2008/2009 a former employee and thief was milking the plaintiff’s company, then the plaintiff suffered a major brain haemorrhage, epilepsy, depression, and then exposed to exploitation and fraud by the Jyske Bank Group, which would take everything from the plaintiff who some time considered whether life was worth living. ! Since 2009, the plaintiff has been struggling to get his life back, and to have Jyske Bank stop the bank’s continued fraud. “Fraud” which today is the fight against fraud the bank is all about. – BS-402/2015-VIB It is about the fraud in Jyske Bank against the bank’s customers. That Jyske Bank so chooses the sick and weak to expose fraud is just low. 🙁 – The client himself has had to make, and submit his claims against Jyske Bank and the management of the court 28/10/2019, after suspecting that their lawyer, Lundgrens may have been bribed by Jyske Bank’s group, not to submit any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank’s group. – When Anders Dam, together with the other Group Board of Directors, chooses to stick his head in the ground, rather than engage in dialogue with the customer, it can only be because Jyske Bank is dishonest in Jyske Bank’s words and actions. – Banks are called greedy scammers and therefore, even the Executive Board, at Anders Dam has chosen not to say. – So when the President of Jyske Bank A/S Anders Christian Dam is personally accused of being involved in gross fraud against a customer in Jyske Bank, it is the responsibility of the Board of Directors, as they jointly stand behind Jyske Bank’s continuing fraudulent business. – Anders Dam is accused of being behind Jyske Bank’s deliberate fraud against the bank’s customer will continue. – – Customers also believe that Jyske Bank has paid Lundgren’s lawyers return commission. And that it is Anders Dam personally who is responsible for Jyske Bank A/S bribing the client’s lawyers LUNDGRENS, for not submitting the client’s fraud charges against the Jyske Bank group. Anyway this is what the customer sad that its looks like. – – BS-402/2015-VIB It is about the fraud in Jyske Bank against the bank’s customers. – The customer himself has to make the final reply on 28-10-2019 and submit their claims to the court. – Since Lundgren’s attorneys, who have been bought and paid for by Jyske Bank, work for Jyske Bank, and therefore certainly do not present the client’s fraud allegations against the Jyske Bank Group. – – If Lundgrens has not received a return commission “bribing”, for failing to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank. Lundgrens then call us on 004522227713 And explain to us what word in our many letters, emails, sms that you may have misunderstood. – We can see that Lundgrens will only summon the witnesses Jyske Bank’s board itself wanted. 🙁 Is this something Lundgren’s lawyers have been paid for? Just ask ? – In answer writing 28/10/2019, as the customer has give to the court, in addition to Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen, from Jyske Bank in Hillerød, which Jyske Bank A / S has wanted to call. Written, among other things, these witnesses from Jyske Bank on. Anders Christian Dam, Philip Baruch, Morten Ulrik Gade, Birgit Bush Thuesen. These witnesses must confirm the evidence presented as genuine, and in addition, witnesses must be heard in court. – – We have not initially written Anette Kirkeby, the manager of Jyske Bank Helsingor. Although Anette Kirkeby contributed to Jyske Bank Helsingor’s client being subjected to massive fraud, and this fraud was not stopped by Anette Kirkeby, who instead chooses to send the client for settlement, when the customer asks Anette Kirkeby to delete SWAP Appendix 1. This was denied by Anette Kirkeby, who insted chose that Jyske Bank can kill the customer. – – After our closing reply, we also think about convening Lundgren’s attorneys with partner Dan Terkildsen. – For Dan Terkildsen to testify, under witness responsibility, whether plaintiff has continuously asked Lundgren’s attorneys to present fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank. – And to get Lundgren’s lawyers to confirm whether or not this has happened. Then you, as a court member, can even assess whether it may be due to Bribery. – When we want to hear Lundgren’s lawyers confirm whether Lundgren’s lawyers have been employed by Jyske Bank for a million jobs. – And about Lundgren’s lawyers, first contacted by Jyske Banks, after we assumed Lundgrens. And of course we would like to know if it was Anders Christian Dam personally behind. – This case is purely about Jyske Bank’s credibility.
To directly contribute to fraud allegations against Jyske Bank has not been presented.
Why the Client Himself Has to Present, the 52-page Final Petition, October 28, 2019
When Lundgren’s lawyers have been instructed several times to present the client’s fraud allegations.
/
We do not need to ask the management of Jyske Bank to ask the police to investigate Jyske Bank, because the bank has bribed Lundgrens, by using the return commission.
Since Jyske Bank has already lied to the court through their board member and lawyer Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, already, several places in legal matters.
🙂
Like Jyske Bank, the customer who is exposed to the bank’s long-standing fraud wants an early decision.
But Philip Baruch, we were just bombed back to September 25, 2019, after we discovered that Jyske Bank probably bought our lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers in April 2018.
So it’s not conspiracy theories, as Lundgrens thinks it is, but simply one FACT
01-09-2019 Remember this is only one of maybe 100 letters and mails to Lundgrens where we ask them to present our case against Jysk Bank A/S Silkeborg Denmark
Sms mellem Advokat Lundgrens og deres klient, med klare instrukser om at fremlægge klientens svig påstande, som Lundgrens advokater ingurerrer, og selv uden om klienten, uden klientens samtykke, eller godkendelse fremlæger sagen mod jyske bank som dårlig rådgivning, selv om klienten her på sms skriver det meget klart, svare Lundgrens advokater slet ikke.
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
Du får lige igen lidt af det klienten selv 28-10-2019. Måtte fremlægge domstolen, nu Lundgrens advokater, sikkert har aftalt med jysk bank, at klientens påstande ikke måtte fremlægges. DET ER SKU DA KORRUPT
Dette er altsammen skrevet her i vores Dagbog, med ønsker om at mødes og gennem gå sagen med jyske banks bestyrelses medlemmer, da de alle sammen er medvirkende til at jyske banks kunder bedrages.
For those of you who use Danish banks or Danish lawyers, such as Lundgren’s lawyers.
Customer in the Danish banks, like Jyske Bank, you should read with here.
Warning against the Danish banks that use bribes.
Notice to you who has shares in Jyske Bank, follow the case. BS-402/2015-VIB
–
We have, as you may have read, informed the court that, on suspicion of corruption, we fired the Danish law partner Lundgren’s lawyers in the case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
A simple and straightforward case, but unfortunately, after 44 months, has not been presented by a lawyer before the court.
Therefore, the Fraudulent Exposed Customer of the Danske Bank, JYSKE BANK, even submits their allegations against this Danish criminal bank.
You can help us, and tell us if we have not clearly and clearly told Lundgren’s lawyers to present our fraud allegations to the court.
Read letters and see more on www.banknyt.dk
Bank News is a diary and is about fraud in Danish banks against the bank’s customers.
?
Here we try to show and document to you that relying on the Danish lawyers Lundgrens can be associated with an unnecessary risk that you should not expose yourself to.
So before choosing the large Danish law firm Lundgren’s lawyers in the Port of Tuborg
So read here how Lundgrens works, and counteract their own client, to help defendant Jyske Bank with the drawer in legal matters.
A link to text messages to Lundgrens can be found at www.banknyt.dk
!
We have previously used Dan Terkildsen Partner in Lundgrens, he would clearly comply with Jyske Bank’s interests, and has withheld the client’s claims and evidence before the court.
Dan Terkildsen’s partner in Lundgren’s lawyers has therefore been fired, on suspicion that Lundgrens has accepted bribes.
The mere suspicion that Jyske Bank Group management, probably the top management, with CEO Anders Christian Dam in the lead who, through the use of a “return commission”, has in fact bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to not present the client’s claims against Jyske Bank for a million frauds, is now presented to the court.
!
Philip Baruch’s partner in Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys is facing the court, sharp distance from the board of Jyske Bank, should have bribed Lundgren’s lawyers.
When reading text messages are between Carsten and Emil, ask yourself?
Why does Emi Lundgrens not respond to the client, and directly against the order, again submits a petition outside the client.
It feels like Jyske Bank, the bank also works only according to Jyske Bank’s own interests.
And then tell if Lundgrens has counteracted their clients’ interests, and instead helped, Jyske Bank towards their own client.
The Danish president of the Danish bank Jyske Bank has big problems in recognizing the bank’s fraudulent transactions against customers, is not fair banking, but when the Danish pension funds such as ATP support Jyske bank’s criminal enterprises, it is difficult to stop for the small man who is up against Denmark’s second largest bank
Den syge kunde i jyske bank, der her i syge sengen 2009 ikke viste – At jyske bank ville udsætte ham og hans familie “deres virksomhed” for BEVISELIGT svindel gennem de næste mange år. – Kunden som syntes at være kommet sig, selv mens jyske bank og ledelsen fortsætter bankens, fortsate svigforretning imod kunden. – Har taget kampen op mod Danmarks anden største bank Jyske Bank. – Og stiller gentagne det samme spørgsmål til koncernenledelsen. – HVORFOR BEDRAGER JYSKE BANK OS KUNDER. – IMENS KUNDEN GENTAGNE FREMLÆGER BEVISER, OVERFOR DEN SAMLEDE BESTYELSE, AT JYSKE BANK UDSÆTTER KUNDE FOR SVIG OG FALSK. – VI BEDER HER PÅ EN ANDEN MÅDE OM JYSKE BANKS LEDELSE IKKE SNART VIL STANSE KONCERNS BEDRAGERI MOD OS. – 11 ÅRS BEDRAGERI ER BLEVET FREMLAGT FOR LEDELSEN. – EN SAMLET KONCERNENLEDELSEN, DER NÆGTER AT HAVE NOGLE DIALOG, IMENS JYSKE BANK FORTSÆTTER MED BANKENS ÅBENLYSE BEDRAGERI. — HVAD SKAL VI SIGE. KLIK OG LÆS OM JYSKE BANKS FORMODET BESTIKKELSE AF KUNDENS ADVOKAT.
En ihærdighed og humor selv ledelsen i jyske bank må grine med på Når en enkelt bedraget kunde i jyske bank, udstiller sig selv for den mægtige, men bedrageriske jyske bank ledelse. Kunde siger til jyske Banks ordstyrende formand Anders Dam Du er fejl og en ussel kujon, hvis ikke du tør gå i dialog med de kunder jyske bank udsætter for svindel
Anders Dam og Philip Baruch Unfortunately, it seems that Jyske Bank has paid Lundgrens Advokater to ensure that Appendices 100 and 101 from 28-12-2018 never had to be presented to the court. Therefore, we have again made an Appendix 164. 02-09-2019 which replaces Appendices 100 and 101 Which has been presented to the court, initially without explanation, this we ourselves provided for 28-10-2019. See what Jyske bank would pay for the client’s lawyer not to submit to the court Now remember that it is the Group Management of Jyske bank that is behind this here fraud against the bank’s customer is still going on 🙂 See Appendix 164. Letter to the court 2. September 2019. See Appendix her
CEO Anders Dam Siger nej tak til dialog med sur kunde, efter bankens mange års bedrageri. Ønsker ikke at tale med kunde, men beder om en dom i den sag BS-1-698/2015 Hvori Koncernledelsen af kunde anklages, for meddelagtighed i groft svig Hvilket er udført af den samlede koncernledelsen i forening
Jyske bank nægter at indrømme og undskylde bedrageri imod bankens egen kunde.
Jyske bank nægter at indrømme og undskylde bedrageri imod bankens egen kunde.
Jyske banks fundament Hæderlig troværdig og ærlig ring og få et godt råd på 89898989
Grim reaper. Studio portrait isolated on white background
Og nej vi vil ikke betale Jyske Bank 250.000 dkk eftersom Jyske Bank er svindler