Here are the charges against Jyske bank for a million scams, as customer’s Lawyer Lundgrens, seems to have been bribed, by the Jyske Bank Group not to present.
We have been writing openly about this since 2016, informing your shareholders as ATP, and Nykredit about it, but they do not care, we must do that ourselves, so when even your shareholders approve, that you are deceiving some of your customers, that we have presented evidence, then it is boring for the people of Denmark, since everyone in the principle, can be exposed to the same fraud as we are exposed to.
This is a hand extension that we are reaching out to meet with those responsible for this in the fourth year, Although Lundgrens has told 13-08-2019 that the management has no responsibility for what we are exposed to when we saw September 21. 2019 discovers that Lundgrens is actually on Jyske bank’s paylist.
Or just works for Jyske Bank A/S

Lundgren’s attorneys at Dan Terkildsen will receive this first folder of evidence on 5 February 2018 for Jutland Bank to carry out Mandate Fraud, Fraud, Document Fake, Proxy Abuse, Exploitation OSV.

Poor lawyer advice in LUNDGRENS.
Lundgren’s attorneys at Dan Terkildsen receive a folder of evidence on 5 February 2018 for Jutland Bank to carry out Mandate Fraud, Fraud, Document Fake, Proxy Abuse, Exploitation OSV.
Lundgrens is requested to proceed with the case and to present the Client’s claims to the court.
Lundgrens advokater har påtaget sig opgaven.
September 2019, har Lundgrens advokater stadig ikke fremlagt nogle af Klientens påstande.
Men Dan Terkildsen fra Lundgrens, har istedet forsøgt selv at styre og kontrollere hvilket påstande, Lundgrens selv vil fremlægge.
Dan Terkildsen Lundgrens har i September 2019 meddelte at han ikke vil bruge så stærke ord som SVIG.
Dan Terkildsen Lundgrens har fra 20. September 2019 kunne svare på spørgsmålet:
Arbejder Lundgrens advokater for Jyske Bank.
Hvis ja så svar Hvor længe har det foregået.
Lørdag 21. September 2019, kan vi se på Lundgrens hjemmeside, at advokatvirksomheden 21. Juni 2018 har meddelt, at have givet jyske bank rådgivning i en trecifret millionbeløb handel.
Lundgrens advokater betegnes herefter som dybt indhabile, og deres store modstand, og konstante ingurering af henvender, giver alt sammen mening.
Lundgrens advokater og jyske bank er bedste venner. Og nok også derfor meddeler Dan Terkildsen Septemper 2019, Lundgrens advokater vil modsætte sig “bruger en anden formulering” at CEO Anders Christian Dam, indkaldes for den samlede bestyrelse som vidne.
As Lundgrens Partner partner Dan Terkildsen writes, it does not matter, and Lundgrens is not incompetent and that Lundgrens can easily lead our case against Jyske bank A / S We are not so sure it was true.

It is lawyers like Lund Elmer Sandager and Lundgren’s lawyers who, in their case here in Case BS-402/2015-VIB
Show very clearly these lawyers’ disdain for the law, which is very damaging to legal certainty, and in sadness to those clients who need a reputable, honest and indefinite lawyer.
Once you have provided evidence, that Lund Elmer Sandager has not only lied several times in legal matters.
But have also withheld evidence to disappoint in legal matters, and have also presented manipulated evidence, so it is bad with the Danish lawyers.
Why should we be exposed to fraud, Jyske Bank knows well they do.
HALOOO we can’t talk about it.
We realize that the danish police will not help the victim here, in the case to stop a continued crime.
with a scuffle with Jyske Bank’s foundation in using words such as Fair, Honest, Honest, Credible and that you will comply the law. If we are stupid and we do not understand the law then call +4522227713 and tell us so we can stop writing in our journal here.

Direktør & Chief Operating Officer
MARTIN KIRKEGAARD
DIREKTØR & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
That the entire board of directors of Jyske Bank’s corporate management refuses dialogue.
And refused to admit fraud, because instead continuing to expose the customer to fraud.
That we do not understand.
Nor do we understand that Jyske Bank A/S should just choose to buy Lundgrens.
Which funny enough after Lundgrens is being bought and paid for, by Jyske bank, suddenly can not see, hear and understand what we have continuously said and written.
DO YOU HAVE AN EXPLANATION

Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Her er de anklager mod jyske bank for million svindel, som kundes Advokat Lundgrens,
synes at være blevet bestukket, af jyske banks koncern til ikke at fremlægge.
17-10-2019 SWAP BEDRAGET AF JYSKE BANK
This page has been moved to the Blog on 16-03-2020
As we are updating the Banking news page, which deals with the Danish criminal banks, we are investigating which Danish law firms that seemed willing to be bribed, and that to help criminal banks, as here in the case. Where a client has discovered that their former law firm Lundgren’s lawyer partnership has been bought by their bank, Jyske Bank, to disappoint in legal matters, by not presenting the client’s allegations and evidence against Jyske bank for fraud and fraud.
A case that has far-reaching consequences for trust in the Danish banking world, where a customer accuses Den Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S of fraud.
The customer has been informed that the case is political, which is why the police have denied the alleged crime and to help stop the bank’s continued fraud, which Jyske Bank’s management is part of in case of misunderstandings, the group has been repeating since May 19, 2016 contacted to help their customer who thinks that Jyske bank has hidden vouchers manipulated with dates and appointment vouchers, and deliberately exposed the customer to fraud.
Follow the case on bank news

The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen

Page 1/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Here, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank make fraudulent action against client, lawyers and the court.

Page 2/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Here, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank make fraudulent behavior towards client, lawyers and the court This should Lundgren’s lawyers present to the court, but instead take Jyske bank as a partner

Page 3/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Here, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank make fraudulent behavior towards client, lawyers and the court This should Lundgren’s lawyers present to the court, but instead take Jyske bank as a partner

Page 4/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Here, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank make fraudulent behavior towards client, lawyers and the court This should Lundgren’s lawyers present to the court, but instead take Jyske bank as a partner

Page 5/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Here, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank make fraudulent behavior towards client, lawyers and the court.

Side 6/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Her laver Lund Elmer Sandager og Jyske Bank svigagtig optræde over for kunde, advokater samt overfor retten Dette skulle Lundgrens advokater fremlægge overfor retten, men tager i stedet jyske bank ind som samarbejdspartner

Page 7/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Here, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank make fraudulent behavior towards client, lawyers and the court This should Lundgren’s lawyers present to the court, but instead take Jyske bank as a partner

Page 8/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Here, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank make fraudulent behavior towards client, lawyers and the court This should Lundgren’s lawyers submit to the court, but instead take Jyske bank as a partner

Side 9/9 BS 402/2015-VIB Her laver Lund Elmer Sandager og Jyske Bank svigagtig optræde over for kunde, advokater samt overfor retten Dette skulle Lundgrens advokater fremlægge overfor retten, men tager i stedet jyske bank ind som samarbejdspartner

The Danish president of the Danish bank Jyske Bank has big problems in recognizing the bank’s fraudulent transactions against customers, is not fair banking, but when the Danish pension funds such as ATP support Jyske bank’s criminal enterprises, it is difficult to stop for the small man who is up against Denmark’s second largest bank
17-10 Det er påstande som disse, om at jyske bank driver en uredelig / svigagtig bankforretning, som vi igen her opdater, de nævnte bilag som er nævnt, er nu fremlagt overfor retten.
–
Først 21. september 2019. kommer snakken, her ind på at jyske bank, muligvis har bestukket Lundgrens advokater, til ikke at fremlægge noget af det Lundgrens, ellers meget klart er blevet bedt om at fremlægge overfor retten.
/
Dan Terkildsen der var vores advokat, frem, til vi valgte at fyrer Lundgrens 25. Septemper 2019. efter mistanke for at Lundgrens har taget mod bestikkelse fra Jyske Bank, i form af million honorar, for at rådgive jyske bank, og derfor bevidst bagefter har modarbejdet vores sag, om million svig mod jyske bank.
Dan Terkildsen der er Dommer i voldgiftsretten, har svært ved at se det kan ligne korruption / bestikkelse, at tage mod million opgaver fra Jyske Bank, og samtidig vælger ikke at fremlægge klientens påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk, som Lundgrens advokater var hyret til, bare 1 måneds tid tidligere.
🙂
Vi må vel oplyse, og fremlægge for retten, hvorfor Lundgrens er blevet fyret, og at vi samtidig henstiller Jyske Banks bestyrelsen Philip Baruch, om at Jyske Bank, hverken direkte eller indirekte, indlede noget sammen arbejde, uanset hvor smart koncernenledelsen i jyske bank måtte syntes at det ikke er ment som Korruption.
🙂
Følg med på BANKNYT dk
Her deles vores påstande mod jyske bank for svigagtighed.
–
Spørgsmål er, hvis disse påstande er bevist, om jyske bank dermed også er en samfunds skadelig virksomhed, noget som Lundgrens nok ikke vil overveje er muligt, da Lundgrens direkte selv arbejder for jyske bank.
🙂
Husk at det her er bare for sjovt, og for at prikke lidt til en sikkert hæderlig jysk bank, der er gode til at skjule sandheden, og bestemt også gode til at lyve.
Anders Dam, din gamle sørøver ring nu til os på 22227713. Har du demens, så tag trøjen du har fået på, så har du nummeret både på ryggen og på brystet.

2019 som managing partner i LUNDGRENS.
ALLE BILAG OG DOKUMENTER UDLEVERES GERNE TIL DEM SOM HAR INTERESSE I SAGEN
Her kommer sager om Jyske Banks tag selv bord, efter deres anbefaling af SWAP lån jyske bank giver dig gode råd
Jyske bank indrømmer 31/5 2016 at tilbuddet 4.328.000 aldrig blev hjemtaget, da banken bruger en dato hvor et andet lån er hjemtaget. Jyske Bank ville ikke svare, og blev provokeret til indrømmelse, det virkede
Her kommer: Om det er dårlig rådgivning, rådgivning givet i ond tro, eller om Jyske Bank var viden om at deres anbefaling, var med til at sikker Jyske Bank en sikker indtægt fremover på din bekostning.
Vi gik i Jyske Bank bad om rådgivning, spørger til lån oplyser klart at vi ikke ønsker FLEKSLÅN da banken tilbyder dette siger det tør vi ikke det er for usikkert for sådan et stort beløb herefter beder vi helt tydeligt og klart om et fastforrentet Obligations lån Jyske Bank anbefaler SWAP LÅNET som bedre
DET ER DA VIST BONDEFANGERI eller hvad Jyske bank fortæller ikke sandheden
Har lagt op til at Jyske Bank kan komme med bare en antydning af indrømmelse på anmeldelsen som er lagt på trustpilot, HAR INTET HØRT
Har bet om aktindsigt flere gange, HAR INTET FÅET
Har anmeldt Casper dam Olsen for at bryde sin tavshedspligt ved at fortælle mig om min daværendes revisors økonomi, HAR INTET HØRT
Har mange gange spurt til hvordan renten på det swap beregnes uden at få et klart svar, først ved tvangs nedbringelse kunne jeg se renten faktisk var det samme, og derfor har klaget over Jyske Bank for urent trav
Har gentagende bedt Jyske Bank sørger for at modtage penge for den grund jyske bank tvang mig til at sælge for snart 3 år siden, den grund som Jyske Bank benægter overhoved har bet mig sælge, og gør til nu mit problem
FØLER sådan set bare at JYSKE BANK har bondefanget mig, og i den grad snydt og bedraget mig kun med et formål at tjene en masse penge, lige lige nu læner banken sig tilbage og kun venter og håber på at alt bliver forældet, så de med sikkerhed kan beholde de penge de har taget fra mig. (lige for at slå fast det er ikke en anklage mod Jyske Bank men en følelse af at Jyske Bank økonomisk har voldtaget mig)
Der er lagt op til en politi anmeldelse af jyske bank for bedrageri.
Dette ville ikke ske, såfremt jyske bank ville ændre deres politik, om hvordan de helst vil have, at deres kunder kender dem. Jyske bank holder stædigt fast, at de driver deres forretning for at tjene penge, de har mange advokater som hjælper dem, dels med at sigte efter forældelse, så et banken ligeglade om de realt har gjort noget galt.
Det er nu engang sådan, jyske bank ønsker at drive deres forretning, de vil kendes på knækket Eller de konkurser banken måske er skyld i.
Tyv.dk er det bedrageri eller bare fed bank forretning
bilag deles gerne
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. Remember now.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Remember that we have tried everything since 2016 to enter into dialogue with Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors and the Executive Board, and only to avoid misunderstandings, which Lawyer Morten Ulrik Gade has also understood on November 17, 2015.
But if Jyske bank has something the bank wants to hide from the public, it makes sense.
Otherwise, we do not understand that such a large and powerful organization, as Jyske Bank’s entire board of directors refuses dialogue, with the customer who has asked management directly since May 2016, and CEO Anders Dam to help investigate whether the customer in Jyske Bank becomes exposed to fraud in even the same Jyske Bank.
Is this a case of bank fraud for millions of Danish kroner, which all friends try to cover, or is the customer right.
Why won’t the police and the city attorney investigate Jyske Bank for fraud?
When authorities refuse to investigate the Danish bank’s continued fraudulent relationship against the bank’s customer, what are the provisions of the Criminal Code?
If you can’t understand, the shared documents, maybe you just think we’re crazy and that Jyske Bank has not done nothing wrong, so talk to us.
Help us understand why? Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, not even denying the Group, exposes their customer to fraud.
We only ask that Jyske Bank’s powerful friends and Jyske Bank’s shareholders ask Anders Christian Dam to enter into a dialogue and help the client to review the case together.
If some in Jyske Bank’s powerful organization have made mistakes.
Are concessions and an unreserved apology a natural consequence.
So dear everyone at Jyske Bank A/S Do you want to talk about this here.
The number +4522227713 Is still on the chest of your own T-shirt, similar to Anders Christian Dam
Dear all.
Remember that Dialog promotes understanding, so talk to your customers, if they have a complaint about Jyske Bank’s fraud against your customers.
Som da Nykredit dækkede over Jyske Banks bedrageri imod bankens kunde, tilbage i 2016.
Hvor Nykredit nægtede at svare på om kunde i Nykredit havde hjemtaget et lån kr. stort 4.328.000 og så senr omlagt dette, først efter Nykredit blev stævnet ville Nykredit svare at der fandtes intet lån på 4.328.000 dkk som Jyske Bank over for retten har hævdet at være et underliggende lån til en swap.
These appendices, including evidence and evidence, show that Jyske bank is doing mandatory fraud, fraud and document forgery, call it what you want, but be aware that JYSKE BANK is cheating on our customers

Appendix 29. 19-02-2010
Jyske bank claims customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit
was presented by Lundgrens, without annexe list or explanation, the customer has instead submitted Annex 29.A
This he read, and the client in Jyske bank, have even had to submit their final defense, after their own lawyer has been fired, on grounds of suspicion of accepting Return Commission from Jyske bank, against not submitting the client’s claims.
Law firm Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen has said that Lundgrens has not accepted bribes
After the client 28-10-2019 in court has submitted allegations that Jyske Bank appeared to have bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, which Lund Elmer Sandager denies, claiming that bribery severely distances Jyske bank

ANNEX Y. Page 1/1.
Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000
valid until 20-11-2008
given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED

ANNEX Y. Page 1/6.
Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000
valid until 20-11-2008
given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED

ANNEX Y. Page 3/6.
Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000
valid until 20-11-2008
given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED

10-09-2015. S.1-52. Response BS-402-2015-VIB. To Jyske Bank’s Appendix K. and Appendix 1. which is alleged to be document false and there is more. much more.

10-09-2015. S.6-52. Response BS-402-2015-VIB. To Jyske Bank’s Appendix K. and Appendix 1. which is alleged to be document false and there is more. much more.

Appendix 7. S.1-3. the original power of attorney 10-07-2008 on a loan offer DKK 4,328,000 expires 20-11-2008 together with the offer.

15-07-2008. S.4-6. Philip Baruch accidentally presents the Swap from 15-07-2008, which the customer discovers in 2016 and starts an investigation of Jyske bank’s business methods.

15-07-2008. S.5-6. Philip Baruch accidentally presents the Swap from 15-07-2008, which the customer discovers in 2016 and starts an investigation of Jyske bank’s business methods.

Appendix 28. A as you can see here, the swap W015776 is closed. 30-12-2008 which we approved 15-07-2008 for the loan of 4,328,000 dkk which we have not taken up.

Appendix O. As you can see, Jyske Bank has removed the approved interest rate swap W015776 on 31-12-2008, on which we signed an agreement on 15-07-2008, if we chose to repay the underlying and offered loan Appendix Y. for the swap, We rejected the loan, and therefore did not repay the loan offered, of Dkk 4,328,000 Appendix Y. and the agreed and approved Swap W015776 on the same and agreed amount. 4,328,000 dkk, closes 30-12-2008. during this period Jyske bank even makes an extra Swap for Offers. Y. is without agreement with the customer. Thus, there are two swaps at the same time on 16-07-2008, but otherwise forgot to create an account for Swappen Appendix 1. Therefore, it is a case of document falsification when Jyske Bank makes such an manipulation.

The fake SWAP 015785 Appendix 1. from 16-07-2008
This relationship from false changed Lundgren’s lawyers to be a contract.
But now look at the letters we have shared to Lundgrens and had actually submitted them
How much has Jyske Bank Group Management agreed to pay Lundgrens for not submitting their client’s claims? we just ask

På densk heder dette her Mandatsvig.
Lundgrens presents this Appendix 53. 09-06-2019, without informing the client about it.
–
“28-12-2019 the client has submitted it as Appendix 43. after Lundgrens did not present it on 18-12-2018”
–
Here Jyske bank raises a guarantee against Nykredit 16-04-2009, for a loan of DKK 4,328,000 that does not exist, an offer that has expired and thus lapsed, which Nykredit makes very clear to Jyske Bank in Bilag AG. page 4/6 on 06-05-2009.
–
That Jyske Bank chooses to lie to the client who is very ill after a Brain Hemorrhage, that he has both taken out the loan and subsequently repaid the loan Appendix D. and Jyske bank chooses by Philip Baruch to continue lying about it to the court , is outright disgusting. If –
Jyske Bank and Lund Elmer Sandager are not in bad faith, disbelief. what is it then ?.
–
The Jyske Bank Board of Directors is not suitable for their position.

Appendix 56. Jyske Bank raises a loan commission of DKK 4,328,000 on April 15, 2009. which do not exist, see Appendix 30. – This appendix was first presented 09-06-2019, as Appendix 56. that the customer until 27-08-2019 believes it is presented as Appendix 45. they can only thank Lundgrens for. – This is because Lundgrens has always kept the client out of their own case, until they are forced to ask the court twice for access to documents before Lundgren’s obedience will share something from the law book of petition. – And Lundgrens must have agreed with Jyske bank what was to be presented, without informing their client.

Appendix 28. 18-10-2016 Mette Egholm Nielsen Nykredit, admits after Nykredit had been sued that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit
Jyske Bank ved Anette Kirkeby Helsingør har altså sagt til Carsten
At er han er blevet en dårlig kunde, hvad tror du ordret sagde de i Jyske banken, det var lige efter et af de møder hvor Casper Dam Olsen ville have lidt noget mere pant, et pantebrev underskrevet på 500.000 kr. og vupti så var jeg blevet en dårlig kunde, tror det har noget med at bankens SWAP lån at gøre, men det vil banken da aldrig indrømme.
Banken vil i dag heller ikke fortælle mig, hvordan jeg så bliver en god kunde igen, men det har jeg da regnet ud JEG SKAL HAVE JYSKE BANKS MODBYDELIGE SWAP LÅN SPOLET TILBAGE, det er et falsk dokument indsat uden aftale, så falsk og lavet ved svigagtighed

Can Danish Banks as Jyskebank be trusted ?
Sager hvor mennesker har måtte gå fra hus og hjem grundet jyske bank KILDER: DR & Pressen
Her kommer der enkeltsager om dem jyske bank rådgav til at enten få eller omlægge lån, til SWAP således banken kunne tjene flere penge, her er et eksempel
Fik pistol rådgivning i jyske bank
Jyske Bank Dømt
Der er mange sager fra jyske bank der vil blive lavet direkte links således du nemt kan finde artikler
Læs dommen over Jyske Bank, som bruger millioner på advokater for at de kan slippe afsted med deres små finurligheder
En sætning Erhvervs rådgiveren fra Jyske Bank Casper Dan Olsen selv brugte. da en af hans hårdt plaget kunder forsøger at redde hans virksomhed efter at have besøgt Ondskabens Hotel