Known Danish law office suspected of receiving return commission of large Danish bank, read the members site at www.TYV.dk
Why is the Danish state not intervening? the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Justice, the police, the Ministry of State, the Parliament. Everyone knows very well that Jyske bank is doing Fraud here. But ok if Denmark wants to allow Danish banks to make money washing, fraud, and which now also seemed to be about bribery, to keep the case out of court. We ask you what do you think this looks like? Has Jyske bank bribed the client's lawyer Lundgrens, in this way to disappoint in legal matters? The client does not give up, even after probably 2 corrupt law firms, Jyske bank's customer has changed lawyer at the beginning of November, for 3 time since 2015. The "3" time must be the course of happiness, we hope that Jyske bank will come to an understanding soon. And say sorry, we have not shown that there were any small problems.
Hvorfor skrider den danske stat ikke ind
Finanstilsynet, Finansministeriet, Justitsministeriet, politiet, Statsministeriet, folketinget.
Alle ved jo udemærket godt at Jyske bank her laver Bedrageri, men ok hvis Danmark ønsker at tillade de Danske banker laver penge vask, Bedrageri, og som nu også syntes at omhandle bestikkelse, for at holde sagen ude af retten.
Vi spørger dig hvad du synes dette her ligner, har Jyske bank bestukket kundes advokat Lundgrens, for på den måde at skuffe i retsforhold, ?
Kunden giver ikke op, selv efter nok 2 korrupte advokat virksomheder, siden 2015 så har Jyske banks kunde i begyndelsen af november skiftet advokat.
Upon closer reflection, the plaintiff is not in doubt. Lundgren's attorneys at Partner Dan Terkildsen must also be called as a witness. The client wants to have Lundgrens confirm How many times Lundgrens has been asked to submit client's claims against Jyske Bank for fraud and false So Lundgren's lawyers in court can explain why, on October 28, the client had to present their allegations against Jyske Bank When Lundgren's attorneys have been instructed for more than 30 times to present the client's allegations and summon witnesses on whom the client may also write. In this way, Lundgren's lawyers can help to clarify whether Jyske Bank has really bribed Lundgren's lawyers to keep the client's claims against Jyske Bank out of court.
Regarding whether Jyske Bank has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, in the form of a return commission.
For this reason, through a collaboration between Jyske Bank and Lundgrens, not to present the client’s claims against Jyske Bank.
Then it is a FACT
Lundgrens gets our case against Jyske Bank on February 5, 2018.
Lundgrens check the website www.BANKNYT.dk April 16, 2018.
Lundgrens then enters into a million cooperation with Jyske Bank.
Just as it is the FACT that Lundgrens will be kicked out on 25 September 2019 for the period 5 February to Lundgrens.
At least 30 times have been informed of the allegations.
And have been given direct INSTRUCTION, to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank, without following any of the client’s instructions.
It should be investigated by the police whether Lundgren’s lawyers have been bribed / paid by Jyske Bank A / S
And who at Jyske Bank has approved contacting Lundgren’s lawyers around March May 2018, to advise Jyske Bank on a transaction for around DKK 600 million.
Just as a study on Jyske Bank has given Lundgren’s other tasks, and which.
Dan Terkildsen from Lundgrens has not wanted to answer the client’s questions, about the cooperation between the parties Lundgrens and Jyske Bank.
If Lundgren’s lawyers are a reputable law firm.
Then the management of Lundgren himself contacts the police and asks them to investigate Lundgrens
The suspicion that some of the partners have been dishonest towards their customer / small client ..
This is an invitation to Lundgrens and Jyske Bank.
Now ask the police to investigate
About Jyske Bank bribing Lundgrens to counteract their client’s case against Jyske Bank and the management.
To directly contribute to fraud allegations against Jyske Bank has not been presented.
Why the Client Himself Has to Present, the 52-page Final Petition, October 28, 2019
When Lundgren’s lawyers have been instructed several times to present the client’s fraud allegations.
We do not need to ask the management of Jyske Bank to ask the police to investigate Jyske Bank, because the bank has bribed Lundgrens, by using the return commission.
Since Jyske Bank has already lied to the court through their board member and lawyer Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, already, several places in legal matters.
Like Jyske Bank, the customer who is exposed to the bank’s long-standing fraud wants an early decision.
But Philip Baruch, we were just bombed back to September 25, 2019, after we discovered that Jyske Bank probably bought our lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers in April 2018.
So it’s not conspiracy theories, as Lundgrens thinks it is, but simply one FACT
Sms mellem Advokat Lundgrens og deres klient, med klare instrukser om at fremlægge klientens svig påstande, som Lundgrens advokater ingurerrer, og selv uden om klienten, uden klientens samtykke, eller godkendelse fremlæger sagen mod jyske bank som dårlig rådgivning, selv om klienten her på sms skriver det meget klart, svare Lundgrens advokater slet ikke.
Du får lige igen lidt af det klienten selv 28-10-2019. Måtte fremlægge domstolen, nu Lundgrens advokater, sikkert har aftalt med jysk bank, at klientens påstande ikke måtte fremlægges. DET ER SKU DA KORRUPT
Dette er altsammen skrevet her i vores Dagbog, med ønsker om at mødes og gennem gå sagen med jyske banks bestyrelses medlemmer, da de alle sammen er medvirkende til at jyske banks kunder bedrages.
For those of you who use Danish banks or Danish lawyers, such as Lundgren’s lawyers.
Customer in the Danish banks, like Jyske Bank, you should read with here.
Warning against the Danish banks that use bribes.
Notice to you who has shares in Jyske Bank, follow the case. BS-402/2015-VIB
We have, as you may have read, informed the court that, on suspicion of corruption, we fired the Danish law partner Lundgren’s lawyers in the case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
A simple and straightforward case, but unfortunately, after 44 months, has not been presented by a lawyer before the court.
Therefore, the Fraudulent Exposed Customer of the Danske Bank, JYSKE BANK, even submits their allegations against this Danish criminal bank.
You can help us, and tell us if we have not clearly and clearly told Lundgren’s lawyers to present our fraud allegations to the court.
Read letters and see more on www.banknyt.dk
Bank News is a diary and is about fraud in Danish banks against the bank’s customers.
Here we try to show and document to you that relying on the Danish lawyers Lundgrens can be associated with an unnecessary risk that you should not expose yourself to.
So before choosing the large Danish law firm Lundgren’s lawyers in the Port of Tuborg
So read here how Lundgrens works, and counteract their own client, to help defendant Jyske Bank with the drawer in legal matters.
A link to text messages to Lundgrens can be found at www.banknyt.dk
We have previously used Dan Terkildsen Partner in Lundgrens, he would clearly comply with Jyske Bank’s interests, and has withheld the client’s claims and evidence before the court.
Dan Terkildsen’s partner in Lundgren’s lawyers has therefore been fired, on suspicion that Lundgrens has accepted bribes.
The mere suspicion that Jyske Bank Group management, probably the top management, with CEO Anders Christian Dam in the lead who, through the use of a “return commission”, has in fact bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to not present the client’s claims against Jyske Bank for a million frauds, is now presented to the court.
Philip Baruch’s partner in Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys is facing the court, sharp distance from the board of Jyske Bank, should have bribed Lundgren’s lawyers.
When reading text messages are between Carsten and Emil, ask yourself?
Why does Emi Lundgrens not respond to the client, and directly against the order, again submits a petition outside the client.
It feels like Jyske Bank, the bank also works only according to Jyske Bank’s own interests.
And then tell if Lundgrens has counteracted their clients’ interests, and instead helped, Jyske Bank towards their own client.