Are some Danish Lawyers and Banks Corrupt ?. Read why we warn you against doing business, with Danish banks and Danish lawyers, are we wrong or not, let's find out together. Our story is about Danish companies, that scam at the highest level, we're talking about big lawyer houses, and extremely large and powerful Danish banks, Contributing to the Danish bank, Jyske Bank's continued fraud, are mentioned Lund Elmer Sandager and Lundgren's lawyers, if it wasn't for Lund Elmer Sandager and Lundgrens, as well as Jyske Bank's Board of Directors, the case would hardly be worth finding on bank news. follow the case in Viborg law BS-402/2015-VIB se more at www.BANKNYT.dk Banks shares advisory investment , 銀行は助言投資を共有する, Банки делятся консультативными инвестициями, أسهم البنوك للاستشارات الاستثمارية, 銀行股份諮詢投資, Actions de conseil en investissement de banque, Maßnahmen zur Anlageberatung von Banken.
12-02-2020 The question to you. Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt and does the Jyske Bank Group use bribery?. Jyske Bank gets new chairman of the board Kurt Bligaard Pedersen who is already the top manager of the English department of Gazprom, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen’s friendship with Sergay A. Emeliyanov, deputy director of Gazprom, who is also known for money laundering which the Danske Bank became known for, the wires to Gazprom can strengthen the bank’s shabby image
No customer in a bank should be afraid that some banks’ management wants to expose their customers to fraud.
But in Denmark there is every reason, not to trust some big danish banks.
The fight against Denmark’s probably most criminal bank, aided by corrupt lawyers.
Lundgren’s lawyers chose to directly counter the client’s fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S was presented to the court.
Which the client stated in the period February 5, 2018 to the Client in September 2019.
Lundgrens in no way complies with the customer’s instructions.
After the client on Lundgren’s website, has found very clear evidence that Lundgrens has entered into a million cooperation with Jyske Bank.
The client in Lundgrens is forced to kick out Lundgren’s lawyers, to have their fraud claims against Jyske Bank presented to the court.
Partner Dan Terkildsen refuses to repay the client’s money, as Dan Terkildsen believes Lundgren’s lawyers have done a great job for the Client.
Without getting into what Lundgren’s lawyers have done.
Since February 2016 we have cried and since May 2016 directly written to Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors and the Executive Board to stop the bank’s fraud crimes against their customers, but Jyske Bank A/S Anders Dam refuses.
If we make mistakes, or are we exposed to serious fraud done by Jyske Bank’s board in association.
Is the question clear enough, or else we would like to come to your plase CEO manager’s Anders Dam office, to review our questions and allegations against your Anders Dam Jyske Bank A/S.
For are we wrong, we of course also will write it, in this Diary.
To date, no one in the danish police, the Ministry of Justice, Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager, has wanted to say you are wrong.
Explaining that our evidence against Jyske Bank for Fraud, is not good enough.
It is a riddle to us for the police to help victim, and not criminals, here we have a case against Jyske Bank A/S, which is in a serious network.
Board members who move around between Denmark’s absolute largest companies there, some also owned by the Danish state.
We talk about very high-ranking and powerful friends, who surely do everything they can to be rewarded for helping Jyske Bank’s board prevent the client’s case from going to court.
Refusing to investigate Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.
As the State Attorney wrote, SVIG 🙂
It had to submit the client itself in civil court, just as the Financial Supervisory Authority does not want to investigate whether, a client is exposed to fraud in Jyske Bank.
Are there some threads between the Board of Jyske Bank and the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, the Parliament.
When the Ministry of Justice writes.
The state will not give free trial as it is a matter of having borrowed the 4,328,000 dkk. in Nykredit, so there is the small customer alone against one of Denmark’s largest organizations, David against Goliath. Follow our case and see evidence that Jyske Bank is a criminal.
We expect the case to go to the EU or the human rights courts.
As the legal security in Denmark does not look good, since a large Danish bank such as Jyske Bank can buy the counterparty’s lawyer Lundgrens, without any wrinkles.
If we have misunderstood something, then we would like to get in touch with the CEO and the management of Jyske Bank A/S.
And have a dialogue about this here.
Are there conspiracy theories, are they misunderstandings ?.
Dialogue promotes understanding, but Jyske Bank’s board of directors refuses dialogue.
So even though we, who are clients of the Danish bank Jyske Bank, may just be small stupid, and no one will read our about allegations against Jyske Bank here in the diary.
Neither Jyske Bank or Lundgrens can say, that we have not tried to enter into dialogue, with the apparently criminal Jyske Bank.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
New board members in Jyske Bank A/S both with legs in the danish Ministry of Finance.
Is there a connection between the State Attorney, the police, the Ministry of Justice, the government, does not want the largest Danish banks investigated for fraud and money laundering?.
And that the court has been informed that Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys.
By partner Philip Baruch has lied several times in legal matters, but as the court does not care, that Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys have openly lied in legal proceedings against Jyske Bank, to disappoint in legal matters.
You can read about the rotten foundation of the Danske Bank world.
And in the Danish financial sector, such as the Ministry of Finance and the Financial Supervisory Authority, you can follow board members, coming from the big Danish banks behind money laundering fraud and other things.
But when several board members are aware that their company, is doing stripes of illegals, such as the the overall board knows everything about, but also supports.
And when the state and state companies such as the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, also have these banks’ board members on their boards, board members who work for the parties of the people, then it becomes a problem for the entire Danish population.
But this is the case, and when the elite of power also has friendships at the top of the police, therefore it obviously works far out, too, if Crime done by the Danish banks, whether it is money laundering or simple fraud by the Jyske Bank, then it is highly unlikely that some of the Danish banks will be convicted.
When the police say they According to Danske Bank, it is a far cry, the board is hardly penalized, as it is one of the banks the state has financially supported with billions of Danish kroner.
If some serious fines come against some Danish banks, they will hardly come from Danish police.
Goldman Sach’s investment adventure in Dong ends with a plus DKK 12.4 billion.
Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen doesn’t think he was fired as boss in Dong himself, but that it was just time to try something new.
When Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen becomes chairman of Jyske Bank, Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen is already informed of the fraud Jyske bank exposes the bank’s customer, and fraud that the Jyske Bank’s overall board supports is Jyske Bank’s way of making millions.
When Jyske Bank chooses board members such as Kurt Bligaard Pedersen.
Who is at the top of Gazprom, which is already well known for money laundering and bribery, it does very well fit Jyske Bank’s values and foundations well.
When Jyske Bank chooses board members such as Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, who is at the top of Gazprom, which is known for money laundering and bribery, it does well fit Jyske Bank’s foundations.
How many people and companies cover Jyske Bank’s fraud against the bank’s own customers.
How many more than us, do Jyske Bank A/S expose to fraud?
The Group’s fraud situation is thus well known by the overall Board of Directors, which at least since May 2016, has continuously received inquiries from the customer of Jyske Bank.
Who has begged Jyske Bank and the Board of Directors to investigate whether the customer has taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000 as offered. 20-05-2008 in Nykredit.
Jyske Bank’s employees such as Nicolai Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen, Anette Kirkeby are in bad faith when Jyske Bank A/S repeatedly says
That the customer has taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, and so 16-07-2008 has agreed with Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade to make a new SWAP of DKK 4,328,000 for this loan.
Department Director Jyske Bank’s branch in Helsingoer. Anette Kirkeby just gives Carsten one last remark, on the way to the green butcher with out the door.
And many more at Jyske Bank and the management are together, to expose a customer in Jyske Bank to continued fraud.
And everyone chooses to keep their mouths and thus passively support Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
Then to tell the sick customer that he has rescheduled, the underlying loan for Swapen, but not least is it evil belief, that department director Anette Kirkeby, sends the client to settlement.
To take everything from the customer owned by the Skaarup family from Hornbaek.
Knowing that the customer has never borrowed the 4,328,000 dkk which Jyske Bank has to date raised a few million for interest.
Try to read Appendix Y. 20-05-2008 and Appendix AG. 06-05-2009. Both offers have been sent to Jyske Bank’s branch in Helsingør.
And see if Offer Appendix Y. has been canceled or if it has been taken home and rescheduled, just as Board member Philip Baruch has presented it in court.
Or is it as the customer of Jyske Bank has repeatedly asked Lundgren’s lawyers to submit, 2 offers for 2 different projects, 2 different plot of land, and 2 different budgets.
Or did the customer make a project 2. As a customer in 2009 made a budget for, and asked Nicolai Hansen to get a new offer for this.
At Jyske Bank without valid authority, and directly against the client’s instructions, first tried to take the offer instead the rejected project from 2008 shows only Jyske Bank’s real values.
The case against Jyske Bank is basically about the foundation of Jyske Bank based on running a fraudulent banking business. and whether anyone can rely on anyone at Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors or group management at all.
If a customer made the same kind of Document Counterfeit and Fraud against Jyske Bank, it would probably not be long before the customer was in jail.
And whether the customer has subsequently rescheduled this loan by Jyske Bank to another loan.
The customer has also continuously begged Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors to respond and prove to the customer that the customer has agreed and approved an interest rate Swap 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000 for the underlying loan issued by Jyske Bank of 4,328,000 dkk
But the Jyske Bank Group has refused any form of dialogue.
Lawyer Morten Ulrik Gade Jyske Bank writes 17-11-2015 and proposes dialogue to avoid future misunderstandings
In legal matters where Jyske Bank has been sued, Jyske Bank’s board member Philip Baruch has submitted.
That it is the client himself who has the burden of proof, this is thus understood.
The customer must prove himself that he has not borrowed the DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, which Jyske Bank has claimed, and which Jyske Bank has refused to prove has been repatriated.
It is this case that JYSKE BANK’s entire board repeatedly refuses to help investigate.
The question of whether Jyske Bank A/S exposes the customer to deliberate fraud, or whether some in Jyske Bank’s group, is responsible for Jyske Bank making fraud, lying in legal relationships, using forgery, using bribery, etc.
The customer says that even though the loan is DKK 4,328,000, the customer has been taken home and the customer has agreed with Jyske Bank that the bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade 16-07-2008 that Jyske Bank will make a SWAP more of DKK 4,328,000. For the alleged underlying loan.
Although Jyske Bank’s alleged underlying loan has been taken up and rescheduled, Jyske Bank has demanded this alleged loan be compulsorily reduced, by demanding the sale of a building plot.
Regardless of Jyske Bank refusing to have anything to do with the sale of Bybjergvej 45, and regardless of Jyske Bank refusing to open a deposit account, and Jyske Bank refusing to receive the proceeds, thus reducing the outstanding debt in Nykredit, after Jyske Bank itself wanted the repayers mortgage security for Nykredit.
If the customer claims that Jyske Bank has in this way forcibly reduced the alleged underlying, and then alleged, restructured loans, without letting Swappen follow the loan, and that Jyske Bank therefore exposes the customer to completely deliberate Fraud.
And this Fraud is supported by the entire Board of Directors and Executive Board of Jyske Bank
When Jyske Bank denies having demanded the sale sale of land.
And that Jyske Bank, Refusing to receive the sales price after the sale, afterwards refusing to have any of the sales to do.
In addition to the many written requirements, Casper Dam Olsen called almost daily, to move the customer, and break down the customer mentally and financially.
Thus, Jyske Bank and the Board treat their customers who are exposed to fraud.
You Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren’s attorneys have violated good attorney practice, acted unethically and dishonestly against us.
There may well be some who thought, we were weird about trying to get into a dialogue with Jyske Bank A/S.
And getting in dialogue with Lund Elmer Sandager as openly, helps Jyske Bank’s board of directors to continue Jyske Bank’s fraud business.
This is how it looks.
But we also ask that Jyske Bank’s board of directors, in association with the bank’s fraud, to meet with us, and help us understand why Jyske Bank A/S is deceiving us.
Although Jyske Bank’s Supervisory Board in November 2018 before the court change explanation.
That the Swap of DKK 4,328,000 Appendix 1. As Jyske Bank has made 16-07-2008 and is made in agreement with the customer.
As Jyske Bank’s Board member Philip Baruch states that it was in charge of making a SWAP, for the project.
The projekt that no one, even the customer, knew about.
At this point, the client does not know that their lawyers Lundgren’s Partner Company was purchased by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
And therefore probably corrupt.
Which is probably why Lundgren’s Partner Company directly against the client’s instructions, has not submitted any of the client’s fraud allegations against the Jyske Bank Group.
Søren Woergaard, Nicolai Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen and Anette Kirkeby know full well that the bank’s customer Carsten Skaarup has not borrowed DKK 4,328,000. in Nykredit.
And not 16-07-2008 has approved a Swap of 4,328,000 dkk. for this loan in Nykredit.
When Anette Kirkeby Jyske Bank Helsingor sends the bank’s customer to liquidate, The Bank’s Business Manager Anette Kirkeby
“Anette Kirkeby will soon be promoted to department director of Jyske Bank Helsingor.”
The customer therefore believes that the Bank’s employees have been in bad faith, and have been aware that Jyske Bank exposes customers to fraud.
As department director Søren Woergaard, and Business Advisers (Sales) Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen and business manager Kirkeby.
Choose to send the customer for final killing, at Jyske Bank’s head office, where Birgit Bush Thuesen stands ready, to take the last from their customer.
Such as demanding sales proxies on the client’s commercial property in Espergaerde, and private house in Hornbaek.
To secure Jyske Bank’s financial interests.
Why the police will not even talk to the customer, but instead rejected the customer’s police complaint against Jyske Bank for fraud, and against Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys to help Jyske Bank’s fraud can continue.
Which answers well with Lundgrens Partner calling us for an urgent meeting at Lundgrens, we meet as agreed.
The are 2 students waiting, Mette-Marie and Emil, Dan Terkildsen is somewhat late from some teaching in the cityhere
And a quarter of a minute later, Dan arrives by taxi that The taxi bill (and one more) has also been written on our bill clearly shows Lundgren’s lawyers are skilled, maybe a little too skilled.
The meeting itself was actually a waste of our time, Dan Terkildsen really only has 1 question
And so Lundgrens could have asked about it by phone
But when the company Lundgren’s lawyers can write time for 3 people only to ask if this is this loan DKK 4,328,000.
which we have not taken home, and points to mail copy from Nykredit 18-10-2016 Mette Egholm Nielsen.
Although it is very clear in the annexes, Dan Terkildsen says he just wanted to be safe.
We wasted probably 4 hours and then it was hardly free.
Dan writes to the court without Lundgren’s response, but we get a copy right after.
Vores påstande mod Jyske Bank var ikke med i brevet
Lundgrens advokater har naturligvis også fået kopi af alle disse breve, hvilket vi skriver til Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens advokater, for at Bestyrelsen ikke kan undsige at være 100 % oplyst om det svig, bestyrelsen i forening støtter.
Er Lundgrens advokater blevet bestukket af Jyske Banks koncern, for ikke at kunne se eller læse og forstå et ord på 4 bogstaver
Eller er det bare konspirationsteorier som Partner Dan Terkildsen siger.
Spørgsmålet er hvad har Jyske Bank betalt Lundgrens advokater MILLIONER skjult som Retur Kommision.
For at få Lundgrens advokater ikke måtte fremlægge klientens SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke har modtaget bestikkelse fra Jyske Banks ledelse, i form af retur kommision fra måske Jyske Banks bestyrelse CEO Anders Christian Dam, eller af Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater ved partner Philip Baruch, for ikke at fremlægge deres klients svig påstande mod Jyske Banks koncern ?
Så svar os på
Hvorfor Lundgrens ikke har fremlagt nogle af de svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S i har fået instruks om.
Og hvorfor vi selv 28-10-2019. har måtte fremlægge vores svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Although we also write to Lundgren’s lawyers and in Danish, clearly write that Lundgren’s lawyers must not present anything to the court, unless we as a client have approved it.
Lundgren’s lawyers again choose directly against instructions, to give their client a finger, and submit 02-09-2019 Procedure 2. Without getting it approved and without giving the client a copy.
Although Lundgren’s attorneys are very clearly informed, that the case against Jyske Bank must be presented as fraud allegations.
And that Lundgren’s Partner Company must not present anything without the Client’s approval.
Lundgren’s attorneys choose to fuck with their client.
If you can recommend an audio clip program, please send a text message to +4522227713
As we are thinking of sharing some audio recordings, for example when Emil from Lundgren confirms that he knows well it is a fraud case, and Emil explain that it is difficult to find the many times requested copies of the court book. and much more.
This is also why Lundgren’s lawyers are fired with cc to the Court
Lundgren’s attorneys deliberately choose not to answer the Client, who did not know that Lundgren’s attorneys have received a larger million dollar amount in Danish kroner by Jyske Bank’s group.
Dan Terkildsen subsequently refuses to be incompetent, and cannot understand that Lundgren’s lawyers were fired for failing to present their client’s claims.
At no time do Lundgren’s attorneys answer questions about the witnesses to be summoned, but choose directly against the Client’s instructions, not to summon the witnesses of the client, in addition to what Jyske Bank’s Board has written.
Even the Client’s witnesses, the Client’s Attorney Dan Terkildsen has planned not to be summoned.
Simply by 02/09/2019 failing to write the witnesses to court, 2 hours before the deadline 4 weeks before scheduled main hearing
And only include the 2 witnesses Jyske Bank has requested.
Jyske Bank’s board refuses to talk about the bank’s fraud, just in case the client has misunderstood.
Whether the CEO chairman Anders Christian Dam, may have bet that the management’s hiring of the client’s lawyer, Lundgren’s lawyers would stop the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank.
At all will be sentenced to the courts, the board by the client in September 2019 fires Lundgren’s lawyers, after they found evidence of Jyske Bank A/S has very likely bribed Lundgren’s lawyers.
And which Philip Baruch wrote to the court, that Jyske Bank is taking a sharp distance to bribed Lundgren’s lawyers.
But the facts are Lundgrens lawyers were bought by Jyske Bank, after the client assumed Lundgren’s lawyers.
A Dane alone chooses to go against the state-supported Bank Jyske Bank A/S to stop the Group’s continued fraud.
A fight against corrupt lawyers who can be inspired by Jyske Bank’s board of directors’ way of running a dishonest business.
Although the client of Jyske Bank A/S knows well that they are up against a seemingly criminal organization, with very powerful friends even in the government, Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has good contacts, but we do not give up against Jyske Bank, even though the Board supports the bank’s fraud crimes.
Finansministeriets delvise mørkelægning af Dong skandalen, og de hemmeligholdte dokumenter fra Finansministeriet som Kurt Bligaard Pedersens har store tråde til, er med til at vise det store net mellem Danmarks elite der bestemmer alt.
The Ministry of Finance’s partial darkening of the Dong scandal, and the secret documents of the Ministry of Finance that Kurt Bligaard Pedersens has big threads, help to show the large network of Denmark’s elite who decide everything.
Når den samlede bestyrelse vælger Kurt Bligaard Pedersen som formand for bestyrelsen, efter Kurt Bligaard Pedersen er blevet direktør i det russiske Gazprom, der er kendt for både bestikkelse og penge hvidvaskning, passer det fint med Jyske Banks værdier.
The client’s new lawyer, who has to present the client’s claims in a more legal language, has said Jyske Bank is trying to drive down the client who is exposed to fraud done by Jyske Bank financially.
While Dan Terkildsen has said Jyske Bank did not think the matter is funny, but where he got that idea from, we do not know.
Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors just laughs at us, says the customer, Jyske Bank is a powerful organization, with threads in the parliament / state that has given Jyske Bank’s group state support, government loans, or whatever it is called 4 times.
Jyske Bank’s group, has this time chosen a victim to expose to fraud, but this time the customer will not find himself in the bank’s fraud, That Jyske Bank’s board of directors support the group’s continued fraudulent against them.
If there is anything you think sounds weird, call 004522227713
And please ask
You, too, from Jyske Bank’s group and their friends, we smile with something that is not true.
Danske Erhverv er et spind af magtfulde mennesker, flere af dem har sat sig tungt i Jyske Banks bestyrelse.
Hvorfor ønsker ingen i dette kæmpe spind af magtfulde ledere at levere skyts mod Jyske Bank A/S
“Sitat som at NYKREDIT vil ikke levere skyts imod JYSKE BANK kom fra Mette Marie Nielsen Advokat i Nykredit.”
Eftersom Jyske Bank og Nykredit også sammen ejer JN Data, og Nykredit har ejet over 10 % af aktierne i Jyske Bank A/S, giver det jo mening at NYKREDIT vælger at modarbejde kunden, og derfor ikke vil svare kunden i Nykredit på, om kunden har lånt de 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit som Jyske Bank A/S gennem et årti har indbildt kunden, der var syg efter en hjerneblødning.
At Nykredit 18-10-2016 indrømmer at der ikke findes noget lån på 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit, og der ikke er blevet udbetalt 4.328.000 DKK til Jyske Bank Bilag 28. dette sker kun fordi kunden stævne Nykredit tidligere på året.
Denne stævning af Nykredit Bank var nødvendig, eftesom Jyske Banks advokater som Morten Ulrik Gade og bestyrelsen samt Lund Elmer Sandager ved Philip Baruch, nægter at svare på spørgsmål om dette påstået lån 4.328.000 DKK findes.
Jyske Banks koncern vil have at det er kunden selv som skal bevise at, kunden ikke har lånt de 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit som Jyske Bank hævder at kunden har lånt.
Samt som Jyske Bank overfor retten har fremlagt at være blevet omlagt. Bilag D.
Og som Jyske 16-07-2008 har aftalt en ekstra og ny rente swap på. Bilag 1.
Det ser ud til at Jyske Bank betalt Lundgrens advokater bestikkelse i form af returkommission, for ikke at fremlægge deres kundes svig og falsk anklager mod Jyske Bank A/S for svig.
Returkommission fordi JYSKE BANKS BESTYRELSE giver Lundgrens advokater et million honorar for at rådgive Jyske Bank i et salg for omkring 600 millioner DKK
Partner Dan Terkildsen der for Lundgrens advokater, skriver at denne sag intet har med den sag mod Jyske Bank A/S for svig at gøre, Dan Terkildsen bruger ikke ordet svig, da Dan har skrevet og sagt omkring 13-08-2019
At Lundgrens advokater ikke må bruge ord som svig i sagen mod Jyske Bank, da det vil være imod god advokat skik at bruge ord som svig i retten.
Lundgrens advokater der gentagne ingurer at kunden i mange breve skriver til Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie og Emil fra Lundgrens at Bilag 1. Swapen på 4.328.000 DKK er falsk, og at dette skal fremlægges.
Klienten Carsten Skaarup siger gentagne til Dan Terkildsen og Emil på et møde 13-08-2019
Altså Carsten siger flere gange på Lundgrens kontor at Bilag 1. Swappen på 4.328.000 kr. er falsk, og det er klientens påstand.
På dette møde 13-08-2019 var Carstens søn Alexander med, men efter kort tid forlod Alexander mødet, og siger efterfølgende til Carsten, kunne du ikke se at Dan Terkildsen sad og manipulerede med dig, og siger Jeg gennemskuede hurtigt Dan Terkildsen, alene hans kropssprog og mimik, og siger Far du skal fyrer Lundgrens advokater, de arbejder for Jyske Bank.
Efterfølgende sige Carsten til Alexander at han har ret, og det viste Carsten godt, men dette møde 13-08-2019 handlede ikke om at blive uvenner med Lundgrens advokater.
Dette her møde var sådan set bare en sidste mulighed for, at Lundgrens advokater kunne vise deres klient, at Lundgrens advokater faktisk arbejde for Klienten Storbjerg, og ikke arbejde for modparten Jyske Bank A/S som vi en måned efter finder beviser for, at Lundgrens arbejder for Jyske Banks koncern.
Ja det fandt vi så udad efterfølgende mødet den 13-08-2019 for efter Dan Terkildsen selv pludselig siger at han ikke kan vide, om der er andre advokater hos Lundgrens advokater som arbejder for Jyske Bank, og slutter smilende med, at det jo er et stort kontor.
Vi finder dog efterfølgende ud af, at Jyske Bank koncernen, kort tid efter vi 05-02-2018 aflevere mappen med beviserne mod Jyske Bank for svig, og efter Advokat og partner i Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen siger han “Lundgrens” gerne vil påtage sig opgaven.
Først 4 dage før vi 2019 fyre Dan Terkildsen grundet mistanke om korruption og inhabilitet, fandt vi på Lundgrens hjemmeside bevis for at Lundgrens advokater efterfølgende vi antager Lundgrens, i 2018 er blevet købt af Jyske Banks bestyrelse til at arbejde for Jyske Bank.
Kan ikke lade være med at tænke, om Dan Terkildsen bevidst lyver 13-08-2019 inde på Lundgrens kontor, når Dan Terkildsen siger han ikke ved om nogle andre på kontoret arbejder for Jyske Bank A/S
På et billede hvor man fra venstre først ser Niels Gram-Hanssen, Pedram Moghaddam, Dan Terkildsen, Tobias Vieth og Thomas Stampe, disse partner har løbende partner møder, og skulle Niels Gram-Hanssen ikke på et eller flere af disse mange møder, have talt med Dan Terkildsen om sammen-arbejdet mellem parterne i Lundgrens advokater og Jyske Banks koncern !.
Vi som først ansatte Lundgrens opdager i September 2019 at Niels Gram-Hanssen der er advokat og partner i Lundgrens, har giver Jyske Bank rådgivning i forbindelse med en handel til omkring 600.000.000 DKK
DET MÅ DERFOR STÅ ENHVER KLART
Lundgrens advokater er blevet købt af Jyske Bank, Lundgrens har ihvertfald tilsidesat god advokat skik, og uden at oplyse til Klienten, at Lundgrens har valgt at tage mod Jyske Banks bestyrelse tilbud om at rådgive Jyske Bank i en stor million handel.
Derfor er Lundgrens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen inhabile.
Hvis Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, er uenige i at være inhabile, og har optrådt uredligt i vores Svig sag mod Jyske Bank A/S
Og hvis de mange Partner i Lundgrens Partner Selskab selv mener, at Lundgrens har fremlagt de påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S som Lundgrens har fået klare instrukser om at fremlægge.
Så vil vi gerne have at Lundgrens Partner Dan Terkildsen, forklare hvorfor intet af det vi selv har måtte fremlægge 28-10-2019 er blevet fremlagt henholdsvis.