12-02-2020 The question to you. Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt and does the Jyske Bank’s Group use bribery?. Jyske Bank gets new chairman of the board Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, who is already the top manager of the English department of Gazprom, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen’s friendship with Sergay A. Emeliyanov, deputy director of Gazprom, who is also known for money laundering which the Danske Bank became known for, the wires to Gazprom can strengthen the bank’s shabby image.
Remember that Lundgren’s lawyers must be corrupt
Since what we write and ask Lundgren to present here September 1, 2019.
And like Lundgrens, the day after September 2, 2019, is Lundgrens presented a chase as is 100% against the client’s instructions
01-09-2019
Remember this is only one of maybe 100 letters and mails to Lundgrens where we ask them to present our case against Jysk Bank A/S Silkeborg Denmark
02-09-2019 1/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 2/5
02-09-2019 3/5 
02-09-2019 4/5
02-09-2019 5/5
See the letter and mail of September 1 and what Lundgrens presents to the court on September 2. and without wanting to share a copy with their client.
It must be Denmark’s biggest bribery case, where Denmark’s next largest bank Jyske Bank A/S has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to counter their client in order to disappoint in legal matters.
Or do the Danish Bank Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgrens have another explanation, then we would like it so that we can share it.
We do not want to accuse Lundgren’s lawyers of being a corrupt law firm.
We either want or accuse Jyske Bank A/S of being a criminal.
And we will not at all accuse Jyske Bank A/S of using bribes to prevent Lundgrens from presenting our allegations against Jyske Bank for false and fraud.
Now remember that conversation promotes the understanding of Anders Christian Dam If Jyske Bank has not bribed Lundgren’s “hidden as Return Commission” for Lundgrens, not to present their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske bank.
Then this entry in the journal banking news should of course be corrected.
This is just one example of the many times Lundgrens since February 5, 2018 And until Lundgrens was fired on September 25, 2019.
Where Lundgrens has, at its most serious, opposed the law, and that which the Danish lawyer community must protect, namely the trust in the Danish lawyers.
When Lundgrens has cheated on their client, and instead worked for the defendant Jyske Bank A/S, in Denmark’s most serious case of exploitation and fraud carried out by a large Danish bank A/S, it weakens confidence in the large Danish lawyer’s houses.
Quality and professionalism are the least you can expect from Lundgrens We couldn’t get Lundgren’s lawyers to help us. But got bills for DKK 185,000 for Lundgrens Partner Company, did not submit some of our fraud claims to Jyske Bank A / S We have asked Lundgrens to pay back every penny we have transferred to their account.
Here is the story of one of Denmark’s probably biggest fraud cases, where both banks and several lawyers companies, and many more are involved, a case that could be solved with dialogue, but Jyske Bank’s board does not want this.
Read 13-09-2019
In Denmark, some of the largest criminal organizations, such as the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S, choose to make fraud crimes against their own customers.
While the group’s powerful political friends have certainly banned the police, the state attorney, the Ministry of Justice from interfering.
When banks like here Jyske Bank A/S with the group management and in the saddle unit CEO Anders Christian Dam.
Who are consciously and openly behind the bank’s continued fraud against small business customer, who just want to get in touch and get in dialogue with Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors for help to settle the matter.
Unfortunately no authorities will talk or help us, since Jyske Bank’s Group and Management obviously has been able to buy our latest 2 Lawyers, as the company, Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, by partner Dan Terkildsen.
We cannot find other explanations that both attorneys, Dan Terkildsen and Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, against the client’s instructions, have not submitted any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.
The way Thomas Schioldan Sørensen has behaved several times, seen in the rearview mirror, has been to help Jyske Bank’s group disappoint in legal matters.
If you have another explanation then we would love to hear from you, and still on phone 004522227713 so we can correct these postings, that you as a reader should be able to trust that Banknyt.dk “Banking News” only writes the truth.
If you have any questions about Jyske Bank, please use this number 004589898989 as the management will hardly be disturbed with such small matters.
Can say, this is something of an odd strength relationship, the only thing we can do right now, while our new lawyer is getting started, after Rödstenen and Lundgren’s lawyers.
Is to write the truth about the men of power in Denmark.
And that the words
MED LOV SKAL MAN LAND BYGGE
WITH LAW MUST LAND BUILD / with law you shall country build. a well-known phrase on the court house has faded a lot.
You are very welcome to follow up on the case against Jyske Bank Case No. BS-402/2015-VIB
13-09-2019 when Dan Terkildsen Lundgren’s attorneys, who should be the client’s lawyer, against Jyske bank A/S counteract the client’s claims are also presented to the court.
WHAT SHOULD WE DO? EVEN PRESENT OUR CLAIMS TO JYSKE BANK FOR FRAUD AND FALSE ?.
See the few appendices and ask Lundgrens and Jyske Bank if a return commission has been used, so as not to present any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S
Former client / Client asks Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
–
First.
Has the Jyske Bank Group accused Lundgren’s lawyers not to submit your client’s fraud charges against Jyske Bank A/S
–
2nd.
Has Lundgren’s lawyer partner company taken a million orders from Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors / Management shortly after Lundgren’s February 5, 2018 was assigned to file a fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S
–
Third.
Now, Lundgren’s lawyers do not intend to deny their cooperation with Jyske Bank’s Group management well.
It’s just a very simple YES or NO.
–
4th.
It was Lundgren’s lawyer partner company who, after February 5, 2018, contacted Management in Jyske Bank A/S
–
5th.
Or was it the management of the Jyske Bank Group There, directly and even contact Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, to offer Lundgren’s lawyers a million deal.
If yes
Who in the Jyske Bank Group contact Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, with an offer to advise Jyske Bank Group management on the bank’s sale of properties for DKK 600,000,000.
Who in Lundgren’s lawyer partner company has Jyske Bank’s Group contact, to get Lundgren’s lawyers to help Jyske Bank Group.
–
6.
Therefore, Lundgren’s lawyer Partner Company has not submitted any of their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S !
If we have not been clear enough, what have we not explained well enough?
More when the next customers Lundgrens files more cases against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.
Hope this is not too difficult questions for Lundgren’s lawyers.
Such questions may well be answered by the Lundgrens Board of Directors.
So that’s why dear Lundgrens
You can use the same number 0045 22227713
The same number in has us hidden under. Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. You must very well explain.
+
Don’t use Rödstenen or Lundgren’s attorneys, as they may seem to be bought or bribed by the opposing party, to counteract your case, to disappoint in legal matters.
The small pea ant 🐜 cannot understand that the chairman of the large Danish bank, Jyske Bank A/S, refuses dialogue, while the group continues the bank’s million fraud against customer.
Anders Dam Call and let’s meet
your old boy, it’s just for fun.
Although someone from the Danish police department, has said that the case against Jyske Bank is political and therefore the Danish bank Jyske Bank will not be investigated for fraud.
It was difficult at that time to believe.
Selv om en fra bagmandspolitiet uden for referat har sagt, sagen imod Jyske Bank er politisk, og derfor vil Jyske Bank A/S ikke blive efterforsket for bedrageri, det var svært den gang at tro på.
But after seeing the political network that supports Jyske Bank A / S, it suddenly makes better sense.
Men efter at have set det politiske netværk, der støtter op om Jyske Bank A/S, giver det pludselig bedre mening.
Men beder om en dom i den sag BS-1-698/2015
Nyt sags nr. BS-402/2015-Vib
Det er Jyske Banks fundament denne her svig sag mod Jyske Banks bestyrelse og Koncern er et godt eksempel på.
Koncernledelsen i Jyske Bank A/S anklages af kunde for meddelagtighed i groft svig.
Hvilket er udført af den samlede koncernledelsen i forening
HVORFOR NÆGTER JYSKE BANKS ØVERSTE LEDER AT SVARE.
HAR JYSKE BANK MAGT I FOLKETINGET, ER DET GRUNDEN TIL AT POLITIET SIKKERT HAR FÅET BESKED PÅ IKKE AT MÅTTE EFTERFORSKE JYSKE BANK A/S
DOES JYSKE BANK HAVE POWER IN THE PEOPLE THAT IS WHY THE POLICE CAN HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED NOT TO RESEARCH JYSKE BANK A / S
Det handler ikke kun om Jyske Bank A/S lyver, for det gør Jyske Bank gerne.
Og når en kunde så opdager at Jyske bank lyver og bedrager, kommer det til kamp, for Jyske bank er en anderledes bank, her vil ingen i bestyrelsen hverken indrømme eller holde op med at bedrage bankens kunder.
DET ER NOGET AF EN ULIGE KAMP DET HER.
Men fock det, det handler om at omverden får øjnene op for hvad der foregår i Danmark.
We have been informed by one of the Danish police that the case against Jyske Bank for fraud is a political case, and therefore the Danish bank will not be investigated, as large political interests have financial interests in Jyske Bank, therefore customers who are exposed to fraud in Danish banks even civilian giant, against both corruption and fraud
Dan Terkildsen konservativ, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Socialdemokrat, er bare 2 magtfulde personer i dansk politik, der begge er dybt inde i den Jyske banks bedragerisag mod lille kunde, en kunde der selv i civil retten, må kæmpe for at stoppe Jyske Banks million svindel.
Har du nogle spørgsmål til Lundgrens advokater kan du kontakte dem her. KLIK
Har du spørgsmål til klienten der fyrede Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, ved Dan Terkildsen.
Efter at have opdaget, Jyske Banks koncern ledelse har betalt Lundgrens flere millioner danske kroner.
Og dermed har taget imod retur kommision fra Jyske Bank, for ikke at fremlægge deres klients svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Lundgrens må også gerne ringe 004522227713 hvis Lundgrens advokater har en anden forklaring på hvorfor Lundgrens advokater ikke har fremlagt nogle af klientens påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S, så skal det straks blive skrevet her.
READ 13-09-2019.
Remember now.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Kan vi stole på Lundgrens advokat partner selskab
Selv om advokat partner selskabet Lundgrens sikkert er ligeglade, om de kan være blevet bestukket, til ikke at fremlægge deres klients SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Så er det en trussel mod retssikkerheden, hvis advokater som Lundgrens advokat partner selskab direkte imod Klientens instrukser. ikke føre sagerne, som de er blivet ansat til.
3.1 Lundgrens acts on the basis of and in accordance with the client’s instructions, and the client and Lundgrens regularly agree on the legal assistance and scope of the assignment as well as the client’s and others’ involvement.
First Lundgren’s attorneys have not written anything that some of their clients’ fraud allegations against Jyske Bank are directly illegal, that is, in accordance with the provisions of the law to present to the court.
🙂
Lundgrens writes they are entitled to refuse to comply with an instruction if this would violate legislation or other rules, e.g. rules of good practice.
2nd If it is against good practice for Lundgren’s lawyers to stop Jyske Bank’s fraud cases against Lundgren’s former client, then Lundgren’s lawyers have not written anything about it. Lundgrens it is for fun laughs Didn’t you like that Dan Terkildsen 🙂
Skal Lundgrens advokat partner selskab indberettes til advokat nævnet 24-02-2020.
Link til kundens egne fremlagte Afsluttende svarkrift 28-10-2019, vores nye advokat ringer slut december og oplyser at Jyske Banks Koncern har ikke svaret retten, Jyske Bank kan måske ikke forstå det vi selv, har måtte fremlægge af anklager mod Jyske Bank A/S så som svig
Read our story abort Jyske Bank A/S and others criminals in denmark.
Men den nu raske kunde mere ser Jyske Bank som et samfundsmæssigt problem, for hvis Jyske Bank lyver over for deres kunder og bestyrelsen står bag.
Og hvis Jyske Bank ikke overholder landets love, og staten ved det, men vælger at dække over at jyske Bank laver svig og falsk.
Så et det bestemt et Dansk samfunds problem.
Og hvis staten støtter danske bankers svig mod bankens kunder, og siger at politiet ikke skal efterforske de kriminelle danske organisationer.
hvor der er magtfulde bestyrelser som i sagen her, hvor Jyske Banks bestyrelse står bag.
Vil bagmandspolitiet mon undersøge om Jyske Banks bestyrelse, har betalt Lundgrens advokater for ikke at fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
For så kan ingen jo stole på at Jyske Bank’s Group ikke også i fremtiden, vil udsætte andre kunder for bevidst svig, og igen bruge bestikkelse for at købe modpartens advokat.
Vi siger bare
At sådan synes kunden at det ser ud.
Og vi mener godt politiet kunne tage dette her alvorligt, det kunne jo være
At det var en politi mand som blev udsat for det samme som os næste gang.
Vi har fået oplyst at Justitsministeriet.
At vi skal klage til Politi mesteren, men vi har allerede lavet en polit anmældelse mod Jyske Bank A/S for bedrageri.
Og når hverken politiet eller stadsadvokaten vil afhører anmælder.
Så vil politimesteren sikkert heller ikke.
Måske er poli ledelsen forud indtaget, når Jyske Banks koncern bestyrels nævnes.
Det virker som om det er blevet politisk besluttet, at Jyske Banks bestyrelse gerne må lade Banken fortsætte med at udsætte kunder for svig / bedrageri.
Stadsadvokaten har sagt vi selv må anlægge en civil sag mod Jyske Bank for at stoppe bankens fortatte svig.
Vi har haft Rødstenen advokater ved Thomas Schioldan Sørensen
Og så Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, ved Dan Terkildsen
Ingen af dem har optrådt som vores advokat
Så det er svært, en mand imod nok 4-5.000 fra en tilsyneladende kriminel organisation, og deres politiske netværk, og magtfulde venner.
Vi har skrevet det som vi har forstået det.
Men ville mødes med Jyske Banks Koncern.
For er det bare os der er dumme, så skal det også frem.
Jyske Bank der ønsker Bedraget kunde skal holde kæft, og blokere kunde hvor banken kan, på Twitter, Facebook, spørgsmål kan derfor kun stilles op på sider som denne.
Kan Jyske Banks svigforretninger skade bankens omdømme, selv om vi har med en bank at gøre, der benægter alt, uanset hvor meget Jyske Bank er taget med bukserne nede.
Selv om DR har optagelser, hvor Jyske Banks ansatte giver bank rådgivning til skatte undragelse
Hvad mon Anders Dam vil sige i jyske Banks bedrageri sager
Det er jo ikke fordi vi ikke har forsøgt at komme i dialog med koncernens magtfulde bestyrelse.
Anders Dam
Kan du ikke se du er med til at lave bedrageri mod os, ansvaret er ved bestyrelsen.
Du skulle være gået til Louis Nielsen
Istedet for at leje at lege gemmeleg
Har Jyske Bank betalt Lundgrens for ikke at fremlægge deres kundes anklager mod Jyske Bank for svig
ER JYSKE BANKS BESTYRELSE PÅ KANT MED LOVEN
ELLER ER BESTYRELSEN KRIMINELLE
DET ER SPØRGSMÅLET SOM DEN DANSKE STAT BØR FORHOLDE SIG TIL
Finanstilsynet, Justitsministeriet og Finansministeriet kender til Jyske Banks koncernens svig, som kunde selv må kæmpe for bliver fremlagt i byretten.
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
Anker Laden-Andersen 2019
Per Schnack 2019
Sven Buhrkall 2019
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen 2019
Rina Asmussen 2019
Philip Baruch 2019
Jens A Borup 2019
Keld Norup 2019
Christina Lykke Munk 2019
Haggai Kunisch 2018 ud
Johnny Christensen 2019
Marianne Lillevang 2019
Anders Dam 2019
Leif F Larsen 2018 ud
Niels Erik Jakobsen 2019
Per Skovhus 2019
Peter Schleidt 2019
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem tidligere Koncern chef i Nykredit
Og at Jyske Bank overholder alle regler og love
Alligevel nægter Koncern chef Anders Dam dialog med kunden der siden maj måned 2016 har råbt op.
Side november 2016 har kørt rundt med reklamer på bilen om Jyske Banks Koncern
Prøv at læse med
Jyske bank beskyldes her for at lave
Dokumentfalsk, Misbrug af udløbet fuldmagt, Bedrageri, Mandat Svig, Udnyttelse, Lyver i retsforhold, Manipulere med aftale bilag, Bortskaffelse af aftale Dokument, og sikkert også bruge bestikkelse.
Jyske Bank er nok bange for kunde, og vil hellere gemme sig, med hoved i busken frem for at tale med den lille virksomhed, som Jyske Bank stadig udsætter for bevidst svig.
Anders Dam fik selv en 2019
En helt gratis trøje, du kunne godt sige tak.
Men nej Anders Dam siger heller ikke tak.
Anders Dam du har nummeret i nærheden.
hvis du vil i dialog
Eller ikke er enige i vores anklager mod jyske bank for groft bedrageri
Det politiske netværk i Jyske Bank er stort, og der laves mange aftaler, for at få mere magt og indflydelse på de politiske beslutninger.
Læs 04-09-2019 Bilag er blevet delt find ud af om Jyske Bank har bestukket Lundgrens til ikke at fremlægge deres klients
(Vores påstande. Hvilket vi beder HENRIK HØPNER om at hjælpe med at opklare)
Ny formand for Jyske Bank A/S
Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen. Socialdemokratisk rådgiver, Som var med til at sælge Dong, og købe for milliarder af gas af Gazprom, inden Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen selv bliver chef for Gazprom engelske afdeling.
Dong og Gazprom: Kommende formand for Jyske Bank har et alsidigt CV
Næstformand Kurt Bligaard Pedersen står til at overtage formandsposten i Jyske Bank A/S
Efter Sven Buhrkals exit. Dermed får banken en formand, som både har siddet centralt placeret i det politiske system, men også har gjort sig bemærket på den erhvervsmæssige scene i ind- og udland i to årtier.
Gazprom solgte mere end 20 milliarder kubikmeter gas langt under markedspriser.
fhv. koncerndirektør, Dong Energy
fhv. afdelingschef i Finansministeriet
og adm. direktør i Økonomiforvaltningen, Københavns Kommune
Er det mon grunden at Jyske Banks bestyrelses medlemmer fortsat støtter op om Koncernens svigforretninger mod kunde.
Med magtfulde Bestyrelsesmedlem der har været med til at sælge DONG, “Ørsted.”
Lave gas indkøb i Gazprom til Danmark
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen har sammen med den øvrige bestyrelse fået 3 brev, med opfordring til at indrømme Jyske Banks bedrageri, og sørger for at Jyske Bank lade være med at lave bedrageri.
Breve er fremlagt da de viser ledelses ansvar, uanset hvad Lundgrens Partner og advokater har sagt 13-08-2019 om at ledelsen er uden ansvar, for det påståede svig
Det er 3. breve som herunder Bilag 86. Det alle er sendt til den samlede bestyrelse, og alle er nu også fremlagt, selv om Lundgrens forsøgte at glemme kundes instrukser.
I alle disse breve gøres bestyrelsen opmærksom på at Jyske Bank udsætter kunden for svig.
Første gang 18-05-2016 skriver vi kun Til Anders Dam, Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager, Morten Ulrik Gade.
Det eneste Jyske Bank svare er.
Jyske Bank frabeder sig henvendelser.
At Jyske Bank frabeder sig dialog med kunden
Forstår ikke hvorfor jyske Bank udsætter deres kunder for bevidst svig
Og så fortsætter banken med at lave bedrageri.
Har banken kunne gribe ind, og stanse bankens million svindel mod kunde.
Men nu er direktion kontinuerligt siden maj måned 2016 fået adskillige oplysninger om at Jyske Bank udsætter kunde for bedrageri / svig, og vælger aligevel at være passive.
Learn more
Det skyldes, at ledelsen kan blive stillet til ansvar for grov uagtsomhed, hvis de har kendt til de ulovlige aktiviteter uden at gøre opmærksom på det.
I alt har 11 involverede topfolk fra Danske Bank allerede forladt banken, herunder topchef Thomas Borgen og bestyrelsesformand Ole Andersen er også på vej til at blive udskiftet.
Kik særligt på dem her 04-09-2019
Klik på billedet
Og se om Jyske Bank, Lundgrens og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater er hæderlige virksomheder.
Eller som Dan Terkildsen skrev
Det er konspirationsteorier
Og dem vil Lundgrens advokater ikke være en del af.
Er det os der er tosset.
Eller er der noget om snakken.
Er Jyske Banks Koncern er kriminel.
HENRIK HØPNER
Vil du ikke godt hjælpe os, og undersøge om Lund Elmer Sandager partner Philip Baruch har fremlagt nogle usande oplysninger overfor retten.
Ingen i Jyske Banks bestyrelse ville fritages for fortsat Bestyrels ansvsr
ved at indrømme Svig
Og
Ved at stoppe bankens svig
Så når Dan Terkildsen det er partner i Lundgrens advokat partner selskab støtter Jyske Bank, og 13. August 2019 på Lundgrens kontor siger.
At Jyske Banks bestyrelse er helt uden ansvar.
Så har Dan Terkildsen nok sammen med Lundgrens advokat partner selskab aftalt at hjælpe Jyske Banks bestyrelse.
Vi har forsøgt siden 2017 at få Henrik Høpner fra Lund Elmer Sandager til at kikke på det strafferetlige.
Henrik Høpner har ikke tidligere ønsket at hjælpe.
Måske kan han snart se at de advokater han er på kontor med lyver i retsforhold.
Du kan læse og se de bilag vi beder
HENRIK HØPNER
Kikke særligt på her 04-09-2019
Klik på billedet
Har set din kollega i februar 2019
Har skrevet til Dan Terkildsen på rets potalen
Hvor Philip Baruch skriver at det er strafbar handling at nævne dig Henrik Høpfner.
Vil du selv ringe og fortælle os på +4522227713
Og forklare hvad strafbart der er i at bede offentligt om din hjælp.
Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager
skrev også
At han ved vi i årevis har reklameret for Jyske Banks svig på BANKNYT og på biler.
Han skrev febuar 2019
At det er strafbar handling.
Er det sandt at sandheden om Jyske Bank er strafbart at oplyse offentligheden om.
Vi forsøger bare på at komme i dialog
?
Når Philip Baruch skriver til Dan Terkildsen
At det er ulovlig og straffbare handlinger at vi kører rundt med vores reklame biler for jyske bank.
Tror du så ikke det er for at dække over at Philip Baruch har løjet over for domstolene.
PS må vi ikke gerne skrive det som er faktum
Under ytringsfriheden
Hvis noget er usandt, så har bi gentagne gange skrevet at sig hvad der er forkert, og vi skal rette det.
Ud over Bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
Anker Laden-Andersen 2019
Per Schnack 2019
Sven Buhrkall 2019
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen 2019
Rina Asmussen 2019
Philip Baruch 2019
Jens A Borup 2019
Keld Norup 2019
Christina Lykke Munk 2019
Haggai Kunisch 2018
Johnny Christensen 2019
Marianne Lillevang 2019
Anders Dam 2019
Leif F Larsen 2018
Niels Erik Jakobsen 2019
Per Skovhus 2019
Peter Schleidt 2019
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
Har Lundgrens advokat partner selskab
Ved partner Dan Terkildsen
Fået en kopi.
Som skulle fremlægges for retten.
Jyske Bank skrev de ville have dialog.
For at undgå fremtidige misforståelser.
Morten Ulrik Gade wrote in 2015 17th of November. that dialogue was a good idea but only until we discovered the scam by 2016, the bank did not want to talk to us anymore.
Brev til jyske bank om at indrømme bedrager Vil koncern ledelsen fritages i dette fortsatte bedrageri så underskriv venligst og returner til den bedraget virksomhed
I alt 3 ligende breve er sendt til Jyske Banks bestyrelse.
Anders Dam mener der er tale om en klage
Og vil starte ikke forholde sig til at kunde beskylder Jyske Bank for svig.
PÅ DETTE TIDSPUNKT
HAR JYSKE BANKS KONCERN ALLEREDE KØBT VORES ADVOKATER LUNDGRENS
TIL AT ARBEJDE FOR JYSKE BANK
Hvilket Lundgrens advokater vælger ikke at fortælle os om.
brev Til Jyske Banks Koncernledelse ansvar for bedrageri
19-09-2018 side 3-4
Anders Dam svare 20-09-2018 på de 3 breve til bestyrelsen
At han ikke vil svare på noget
bedrageri
Anders Dam vil ikke bevise noget som helst
Alt imens ledelsen lader bedrageri fortsætte
Vi formoder at det er ledelsen med Anders Christian Dam i spidsen.
Der har indgået et samarbejde mellem vores advokater Lundgrens advokat partner selskab
Og med Jyske Banks Koncern ledelse
Om at Lundgrens advokater ikke måtte fremlægge deres klients påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Så når Jyske Banks direktør henviser til Processkrifter for retten, må Anders Dam have vidst at Lundgrens advokater ikke ville fremlægge Klientens svig påstande, som tydeligt er oplyst til den samlede bestyrelse i jyske bank.
03-01-2019
Dette er sendt til Mette-Marie Nielsen Lundgrens
Hvad har vi gjort Jyske Bank og Lundgrens samt Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater.
Siden ingen vil hjælpe os med at opklare sandheden om Jyske Banks Koncern
Og vi iøvrigt selv må lege advokat
Vil vi under sagens behandling, og til den skal i landsretten, undersøge forbindelserne imellem Jyske Banks bestyrelse, deres politiske netværk.
Mens vi har forsøgt at komme i dialog med Jyske Banks Koncern ledelse, og chef
Den ordstyrerende formand CEO Anders Christian Dam.
Har ledelsen meddelt lige før jul gennem Jyske Bank Bestyrels medlem Philip Baruch.
At Jyske Bank blankt har afvist dialog, alt imens koncernens bestyrelsen stadig skrald griner af kunden, som fortsat bliver udsat for Jyske Banks svigforretninger.
Altså jyske bank vil vise deres øvrige kunder, at hvis nogle kunder vil prøve på at stoppe bankens besvigelser, så kommer de til at kæmpe, mod en organisation der bruger alle kneb.
Og kunderne i Jyske Bank skal da vide, at Koncernen gerne lyver og bruger falske oplysninger for skuffe i retsforhold.
Om Jysk Bank også bruger bestikkelse, det bør være noget Bagmandspolitiet efterforsker, vi står ved den politi anmeldelse mod Jyske Bank A/S som vi indgav påsken 2016. Flere beviser er kommet til.
Den Konservative Lundgrens advokat Dan Terkildsen er dygtig.
Når ja de er alle dygtige
Efter som hverken
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
Eller nogle andre i Lundgrens aldrig har haft til hensigt at fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Om Lundgrens advokater af Jyske Banks Koncern har fået bestikkelse i form af retur kommision, syntes Lundgrens advokat partner selskab vist ikke er forkert.
Men i skulle tilbage betale de penge i uberettiget har fået.
Partner Dan Terkildsen der er inde i dansk politik, og som kunne blive minister for de konservative folkeparti, hvis altså ikke lige Hans Engell var Braget ind i en beton klods midt på vejen.
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
Eller nogle andre i Lundgrens aldrig har ville fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Om Lundgrens advokater er blevet bestukket af Jyske Banks ledelse for netop ikke at fremlægge deres klients påstande mod Jyske Bank for svig og falsk.
Eller Lundgrens advokat partner selskab har fået bestikkelse i form af retur kommision betyder mindre.
Spørgsmålet er om danskere kan stole på deres advokater, hvis de som her i sagen, direkte har gået mod deres klienter, for at hjælpe modparten.
syntes Lundgrens advokat partner selskab
ikke i skulle tilbage betale de penge i uberettiget har fået for at fremlægge vores svig sag mod Jyske Bank A/S nu i intet har fremlagt
Advokat Dan Terkildsen som var vores advokat fra Lundgrens, frem til Dan fyret efter mistanke om korruption.
Dan Terkildsen viser her i sagen hvad han og Lundgrens står for, og dermed også hvad konservative så står for.
Dan Terkildsen der ofte er dirigent på de Konservative folkepartis årsmøder, senest 29 september 2019
Dan Terkildsen startede i konservativ tidligt i sin ungdom, og har arbejdet sig op.
Klik og læs mere om de Konservative Politiske fokusområde, som Dan Terkildsen er politisk med i.
Dan Terkildsens personlige værdier syntes dog ikke at matche linket underneden, omkring respekt for
I HVERTFALD IKKE NÅR DAN TERKILDSEN HAR MODARBEJDET DERES KLIENTS INSTRUKSER
Respekt for loven og vores fælles værdier, skriver konservative folkeparti i deres parti parti pogram.
Senest var Dan Terkildsen dirigent på de konservice årsmødet Hvor Dan Terkildsen har meget indflydelse i partiet,
Dan Terkildsen har tæt kontakt med Konservative folkepartis øverste top. Og var ordstyrer på deres års møde i 2019?
Så hvis Lundgrens advokater er blevet bestukket for at Dan Terkildsen ikke måtte fremlægge deres klients påstande mod Jyske Bank.
Så er det et stort problem
Her stilles spørgsmål til Lundgrens og Jyske Bank A/S
Vi mistanker idag Lundgrens for at være blevet bestukket.
?
Hvilket stiller store spørgsmålstegn ved Lundgrens troværdighed
?
Hvad for regler gælder der for at drive en bank.
?
Den danske bank kender reglerne for at drive bank virksomhed, og har fyret flere folk i Bestyrelsen.
?
Det kniber dog gevaldigt for Jyske Bank A/S
At overholde god skik og optræde redeligt.
Ingen i Koncern vil indrømme deres fejl, som andre banker undskylder.
?
De etiske regler. Advokat samfundet.
?
Dan Terkildsen
–
8. Interessekonflikter
–
Hvad betyder interesse konflikter
Interessekonflikter opstår, når forfattere eller deres institutioner samt bedømmere eller redaktører har finansielle eller personlige interesser, som uhensigtsmæssigt kan influere på vedkommendes dømmekraft.
Bestikkelse kort fortalt
Er det grunden til at Lundgrens Partner Selskab efter Lundgrens indgåelse af million aftale, med Jyske Banks bestyrelse, direkte har modarbejdet at klientens svig og falsk sag mod Den ærlige og troværdige Jyske Bank A/S ikke måtte blive fremlagt for domstolene. ?
Typer af korruption
8.1 Lundgrens kontrollerer straks efter modtagelsen af et opdrag – og inden arbejdet med dette iværksættes – om Lundgrens’ engagement giver anledning til interessekonflikter, der afskærer Lundgrens fra at repræsentere klienten i relation til det pågældende opdrag. Relevante forhold drøftes med klienten, inden sagsbehandlingen påbegyndes.
DET ER FAKTA
Lundgrens Partner Dan Terkildsen, får materialet mod Jyske Bank A/S og de første Beviser for svig 05-02-2018 og blev der ansat til at fører en svig og falsk sag mod Jyske Bank 5. Februar 2018.
Dan Terkildsen siger også at han har talt med Thomas Schioldan Sørensen kort før.
Og fortæller at Thomas Schioldan Sørensen ikke er så dum, og siger så at Thomas Schioldan Sørensen fra Rødstenen advokater har sagt vi har opdaget nogle vigtige ting.
Lundgrens påtager sig opgaven
Hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke har forstået det vi gentagne gange har skrevet.
SÅ FORKLAR VENLIGST HVAD I IKKE HAR FORSTÅET
DA VI JO TROR DET ER JYSKE BANKS PENGE
DER HAR SLØRET LUNDGRENS
Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, vælger et par måneder efter, at Lundgrens vælger at tager imod Jyske Banks tilbud om at rådgive Jyske Bank i et salg for i omegnen af 600 millioner dkk.. Hvilket må være en stor million indtægt for Lundgrens.
Hvilket Lundgrens Partner den Dan Terkildsen ikke kan se noget forkert i, det handler vel om sammen-arbejdet mellem Den ærlige og troværdige Jyske Bank A/S og Lundgrens, denne opgave for Jyske Bank A/S
Er afsluttet før 21. Juni 2018.
VI SPØRGER DERFOR
Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, om denne million opgave for Jyske Bank A/S
Ikke er grunden til at Lundgrens Partner Selskab, ved Partner Dan Terkildsen der helt bevidst sørgede for at jeres klients sag imod Jyske Bank A/S for svig ikke af Lundgrens blev fremlagt i retten.
Vi beder om at Lundgrens Bestyrelse.
Om at forklare sig, om de nede under nævnte medarbejdere i Lundgrens advokat partner selskab,
Har kunne misforstå hvad jeres klient skrev og fortalte at sagen mod Den ærlige og troværdige Jyske Bank A/S handlede om.
Et er jeres Bogholderi.
De bogførte 2 indbetalinger forkert og kunne derefter ikke finde 20 og 30.000 DKK
Det er Lundgrens bogholderi
LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER
Partner Dan Terkildsen
Bestikkelse Returkommission
Den Konservative Lundgrens advokat Dan Terkildsen der nærliggende var blevet minister i folketinget for de konservative, hvis altså ikke Hans Engell bragede ind i en beton klods. Som flere politi folk tilbød at dække over.
Spørgsmålet er også om Den ærlige og troværdige Jyske Bank A/S nyder samme støtte siden politiet ikke engang ville tale med Anmeldelser af Jyske Bank A/S for bedrageri, hvilket bestyrelsen i forening støtter fortsættes, frem for dialog med kunden.
Dan Terkildsen er dygtig.
Når ja de er alle dygtige
Men efter som hverken
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
Eller nogle andre i Lundgrens aldrig har haft til hensigt, at fremlægge nogle af Klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
TYDER DET PÅ
AT Jyske Bank A/S KONCERN LEDELSE
HAR BESTUKKET LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER
TIL IKKE AT FREMLÆGGE KLIENTENS PÅSTANDE
IMOD Jyske Bank A/S
Om Lundgrens advokater af Jyske Bank A/S Koncern har fået Bestikkelse, og det i form af Returkommission. Offentlig gjort 21/06/2018
🙂
Eksempel
En kunde der syntes deres tidligere Thomas Schioldan Sørensen i Rødstenen advokater
Der skulle fremlægge flere svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S denne Thomas Schioldan Sørensen forsøger istedet at hæve sagen istedet for at fremlægge Klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Lundgrens bliver anbefalet af en tidligere bank bankdirektør.
Og som siger Jyske Bank A/S
Er ikke berettiget til at starte nogen rente swap.
Om de ikke har forsøgt at lukke sagen, hvortil vi fortæller at Rødstenen advokater
Kun 2 måneder efter Lundgrens 5. Februar 2018 blev ansat af klient til at fører Klientens sag om svig og falsk imod Jyske Bank A/S
Hvad for regler gælder der for at drive en bank.
–
Den danske bank kender reglerne for at drive bank virksomhed, og har fyret flere folk i Bestyrelsen.
–
Det kniber dog gevaldigt for Jyske Bank A/S
At overholde god skik og optræde redeligt.
Ingen i Koncern vil indrømme deres fejl, som andre banker undskylder.
Spørgsmålet er om det politiskt er besluttet at danske banker ikke må straffes for deres åbenlyse straf overtrædelser, særligt hvis hele bankens bestyrelse efterfølgende må skiftes ud, for at overholde finans tilsynets regler for at drive bank virksomhed i Danmark.
Husk det her er for at skabe en dialog
Og at du skal sætte spørgsmålstegn ved, om du kan stole på de danske advokater.
Her har vi dårlig erfaring med
Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater
Rødstenen advokater
Lundgrens advokater
Den Konservative Lundgrens advokat
Dan Terkildsen er dygtig.
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
–
Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens advokater partner selskab. Klik og bliv klogere på Advokat kurser Et kursus koster knap 4.000 DKK
LÆS MERE PÅ DANSK HER
VI PRØVER AT FORKLARER
18-02-2020
Omkring
Rødstenen advokater
Lundgrens advokater
Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater
Og hvordan disse syntes at have hjulpet Jyske Bank
Med at holde kundens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S ude af retten.
Frem til kunden fyrer Lundgrens advokater, og vælger selv at fremlægde deres påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S den 28-10-2019
Herefter finder kunden en ærlig advokat som vil fører sagen mod Jyske Bank A/S. Med de påstande kunden har fremlagt
AT DETTE HER ER FAKTISK RET ALVORLIGT
Det handler om retssikkerheden er under voldsom pres.
Spørgsmål til sagen mod Jyske Bank og bankens samlede bestyrelse.
004522227713
No customer in a bank should be afraid that some banks’ management wants to expose their customers to fraud.
But in Denmark there is every reason, not to trust some big danish banks.
The fight against Denmark’s probably most criminal bank, aided by corrupt lawyers.
Have for several years spoken up about the false loans in the jyske bank.
Jyske bank refuses to stop stealing interest.
For a loan, jyske bank well know is not available.
Jyske bank CEO Anders Dam also refuse to answer a customer of the bank, which informed jyske bank that it is both fraud and a fake loan.
Is the royal Danish bank honorable, honest, trustworthy
As the bank is claiming over the world
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
Anker Laden-Andersen 2019
Per Schnack 2019
Sven Buhrkall 2019
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen 2019
Rina Asmussen 2019
Philip Baruch 2019
Jens A Borup 2019
Keld Norup 2019
Christina Lykke Munk 2019
Haggai Kunisch 2018
Johnny Christensen 2019
Marianne Lillevang 2019
Anders Dam 2019
Leif F Larsen 2018
Niels Erik Jakobsen 2019
Per Skovhus 2019
Peter Schleidt 2019
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
Advokat Jyske Bank skriver 17-11-2015
At banken foreslår dialog
For at undgå fremtidige misforståelser.
Bilaget er fremlagt retten
Beder Morten Ulrik Gade om at vider sende denne her til CEO Anders Christian Dam
Også så igen til ledelsen 19-05-2016
Dette bilag er fremlagt i retten
25-05-2016
Bilaget er fremlagt i retten
Har advokat Morten Ulrik Gade ændret mening
NU VIL JYSKE BANKS SAMLEDE BESTYRELSE IKKE TALE OS
Har det noget at gøre med de straffe overtrædelser, vi har dokumenteret i sagen mod Jyske Bank.
Jyske Bank måske Danmarks uærligste bank
But if Jyske bank has something the bank wants to hide from the public, it makes sense.
Otherwise, we do not understand that such a large and powerful organization, as Jyske Bank’s entire board of directors refuses dialogue, with the customer who has asked management directly since May 2016, and CEO Anders Dam to help investigate whether the customer in Jyske Bank becomes exposed to fraud in even the same Jyske Bank.
Is this a case of bank fraud for millions of Danish kroner, which all friends try to cover, or is the customer right.
Why won’t the police and the city attorney investigate Jyske Bank for fraud?
When authorities refuse to investigate the Danish bank’s continued fraudulent relationship against the bank’s customer, what are the provisions of the Criminal Code?
If you can’t understand, the shared documents, maybe you just think we’re crazy and that Jyske Bank has not done nothing wrong, so talk to us.
Help us understand why? Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, not even denying the Group, exposes their customer to fraud.
We only ask that Jyske Bank’s powerful friends and Jyske Bank’s shareholders ask Anders Christian Dam to enter into a dialogue and help the client to review the case together.
If some in Jyske Bank’s powerful organization have made mistakes.
Are concessions and an unreserved apology a natural consequence.
So dear everyone at Jyske Bank A/S
Do you want to talk about this here.
The number +4522227713
Is still on the chest of your own T-shirt, similar to Anders Christian Dam
Dear all.
Remember that Dialog promotes understanding, so talk to your customers, if they have a complaint about Jyske Bank’s fraud against your customers.
Birgit Buch Thuesen
Anders Christian Dam
So we would like to read all letters, and emails to Lundgrens.
And let Lundgrens explain
where we should have asked Lundgren’s attorneys to present the case as bad advice!
🙂
We can also play some recordings.
in case Emil or Mette-Marie from Lundgrens have difficulty remembering what has been said.
More if Lundgrens forgot what was said by phone.
/
We have tried before, that is, some find it difficult to remember. First with Nykredit first confirming that the contribution to Nykredit is 3% due to the Swap Jyske Bank has made, as we ask for it in writing to change Nykredit’s explanation, which we refer to, and is threatened that Nykredit will take the customer relationship up for assessment.
So if we do not quote Nykredit correctly.
We re-write 2 minutes of the conversation after the recording, and then we don’t talk about it anymore.
/
At Rødstenen lawyers, they call and ask if we can’t help but write and share the case with the public.
Rødstenen lawyers, also claim that at a meeting with 2 lawyers, we have agreed to close the case against Jyske Bank.
As we ask Rødstenen lawyers to refute this, Roedstenen lawyers refuse to confirm, even though the conversation is recorded.
It is something fun that both Rødstenen and Lundgren’s attorneys counter that our claims were made.
The number is still 004522227713
In court it is only about what can be proved, and this evidence as well as our allegations against Jyske Bank, neither Rødstenen lawyers in Aarhus, nor Lundgren’s lawyers in Copenhagen Tuborg Port submitted any of.
It is clear that Lundgren’s lawyers were very likely, have been paid for failing, to present some of the client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank.
This is how the applicant interprets Lundgren’s action in the case against Jyske Bank
Lundgren’s lawyers chose to directly counter the client’s fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S was presented to the court.
Which the client stated in the period February 5, 2018 to the Client in September 2019.
Lundgrens in no way complies with the customer’s instructions.
After the client on Lundgren’s website, has found very clear evidence that Lundgrens has entered into a million cooperation with Jyske Bank.
The client in Lundgrens is forced to kick out Lundgren’s lawyers, to have their fraud claims against Jyske Bank presented to the court.
Partner Dan Terkildsen refuses to repay the client’s money, as Dan Terkildsen believes Lundgren’s lawyers have done a great job for the Client.
Without getting into what Lundgren’s lawyers have done.
Then be careful
Lundgrens does also choose to work for the opposing part Jyske Bank A/S.
And is habil, in our fraud and false case against Jyske Bank A/S 🏦.
Then Lundgrens chose to accept a million jobs, offered by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
Just a few months after Lundgrens took the assignment against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and false.
🙁
We fired Lundgrens 1 year after, when we discovered that Lundgren’s Partner Company real works for Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
And therefore directly in contravention of good lawyer custom, counteract us, and that our claims against Jyske Bank were not presented to the courts.
Therefore we would like to warn you as a client in Lundgrens, as we believe they have received a return commission from Jyske Bank, to help Jyske Bank A/S
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
With contacts to political parties, the Ministry of Finance, the Finance Council list is long.
The question is whether the state, does not want Jyske Bank’s fraud transactions to be investigated.
And we are therefore quite alone in stopping Jyske Bank fraud.
Since February 2016 we have cried and since May 2016 directly written to Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors and the Executive Board to stop the bank’s fraud crimes against their customers, but Jyske Bank A/S Anders Dam refuses.
Jyske Bank we ask you all, including Lund Elmer Sandager, and your new lawyers in Lundgrens. ?
If we make mistakes, or are we exposed to serious fraud done by Jyske Bank’s board in association.
Is the question clear enough, or else we would like to come to your plase CEO manager’s Anders Dam office, to review our questions and allegations against your Anders Dam Jyske Bank A/S.
For are we wrong, we of course also will write it, in this Diary.
If we have not presented our claims clearly enough, then help us and let’s meet over a cup of coffee, then it can not be so difficult to interpret the Danish laws and rules.
How fun it seemed in this, on a scale of 1 to 1000. 1 is the most fun.
We even give the 1000, as we only pretend to be funny.
Casper Dam Olsen
Philip Baruch
Birgit Buch Thuesen
Morten Ulrik Gade
Anders Dam
We would rather just talk to Anders Christian Dam
Who is the top responsible manager at Jyske Bank A/S,
Maybe it is just us, who do not know and understand the laws and regulations that apparently do not apply to Jyske bank.
But who are they laws and regulations, that apply to banks’ customers, or whether Jyske Bank’s board of directors is at odds with the law, when a bank such as Jyske Bank itself continuously refuses dialogue.
with customers who want Jyske Bank to take responsibility, instead of refusing and investigating whether, the bank’s customers are exposed to fraud.
To date, no one in the danish police, the Ministry of Justice, Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager, has wanted to say you are wrong.
Explaining that our evidence against Jyske Bank for Fraud, is not good enough.
It is a riddle to us for the police to help victim, and not criminals, here we have a case against Jyske Bank A/S, which is in a serious network.
Board members who move around between Denmark’s absolute largest companies there, some also owned by the Danish state.
We talk about very high-ranking and powerful friends, who surely do everything they can to be rewarded for helping Jyske Bank’s board prevent the client’s case from going to court.
Refusing to investigate Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.
As the State Attorney wrote, SVIG 🙂
It had to submit the client itself in civil court, just as the Financial Supervisory Authority does not want to investigate whether, a client is exposed to fraud in Jyske Bank.
Are there some threads between the Board of Jyske Bank and the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, the Parliament.
When the Ministry of Justice writes.
where lawyer Mette Egholm Nielsen writes that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit.
A loan Jyske Bank claims has been taken home, and that even though Nykredit at Bilag AG. 06-05-2009 writes to Jyske Bank that the offer “DKK 4,328,000.” and the mortgage deed has lapsed, it does not exist.
The state will not give free trial as it is a matter of having borrowed the 4,328,000 dkk. in Nykredit, so there is the small customer alone against one of Denmark’s largest organizations, David against Goliath. Follow our case and see evidence that Jyske Bank is a criminal.
We expect the case to go to the EU or the human rights courts.
As the legal security in Denmark does not look good, since a large Danish bank such as Jyske Bank can buy the counterparty’s lawyer Lundgrens, without any wrinkles.
Vi kunne ikke få Lundgrens advokater til at hjælpe os.
Men fik regninger for 185.000 DKK for at Lundgrens Partner Selskab, ikke Fremlægde nogle af vores svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Ja det er nok også derfor, at det ikke ikke hjalp, at bede 3 forskellige medarbejdere i Lundgrens, Dan, Mette-Marie, Emil om af fremlægge vores svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Men Lundgrens ville noget andet. / Lundgrens advokater
Er siger selv at Lundgrens er blandt de bedste inden for deres forretningsområder, og at alle er personligt optaget af din forretning
We are Lundgrens, and that means everyone works and thinks the same way
Yes, that’s probably why it didn’t help to ask 3 different employees in Lundgrens, Dan, Mette-Marie, Emil to submit our fraud allegations to Jyske Bank A / S But Lundgrens wanted something else. / Lundgren’s lawyers
Are claim the are among the best in there business areas and everyone is personally concerned about your business
tilføre nye anklager om svig og falsk som sagen var blevet ændret til februar 2016.
Advokatfirmaet Rödstenen, som vi ansatte for at fører vores sag, ville ikke fremlægge sagen som vi bad om, vi ved ikke hvilken aftale Rødstenen måtte have lavet, med Jyske banks advokater i Lunde Elmer Sandager
Bagefter får vi Lundgrens advokater
Også disse advokater har vi problemer med
Vi opdager at Jyske Banks bestyrelse sandsynligvis har bestukket Lundgrens advokater, til at modarbejde klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank blev fremlagt i retten.
Dette kaldes i daglig tale
Bestikkelse og korruption
Det er altså det vi syntes det er
If we have misunderstood something, then we would like to get in touch with the CEO and the management of Jyske Bank A/S.
And have a dialogue about this here.
Are there conspiracy theories, are they misunderstandings ?.
Dialogue promotes understanding, but Jyske Bank’s board of directors refuses dialogue.
So even though we, who are clients of the Danish bank Jyske Bank, may just be small stupid, and no one will read our about allegations against Jyske Bank here in the diary.
Neither Jyske Bank or Lundgrens can say, that we have not tried to enter into dialogue, with the apparently criminal Jyske Bank.
Ordstyrerende formand for Jyske Bank A/S
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Bestyrelsens nye medlem bliver Bente Overgaard
Bente Overgaard har været koncern direktør i Nykredit
Disse er alle sammen tilbudt at indrømme bedrageri og mulighed for at komme ud af det fortsatte bedrageri forhold mod deres kunde, Hvilket ingen af bestyrelsen ønsker.
/
These are all offered to admit fraud and the opportunity to get out of the ongoing fraud relationship with their customer, which none of the board wants
New board members in Jyske Bank A/S both with legs in the danish Ministry of Finance.
Is there a connection between the State Attorney, the police, the Ministry of Justice, the government, does not want the largest Danish banks investigated for fraud and money laundering?.
And that the court has been informed that Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys.
By partner Philip Baruch has lied several times in legal matters, but as the court does not care, that Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys have openly lied in legal proceedings against Jyske Bank, to disappoint in legal matters.
Hvorfor ville nykredit ikke udlever alle bilag.
–
Hvorfor dækkede Nykredit over Jyske Banks Bedrageri, ved ikke at ville oplyse os om vi har lånt de 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit som Jyske Bank har påstået.
Tidligere Koncern chef i Nykredit Bente Overgaard flytter til Jyske Banks bestyrelse.
Nykredit er ikke længere storaktionær i Jyske Bank
Og bytter gerne Bestyrels medlemmer
Den der vælger at modarbejde Jyske Banks økonomiske interesser, og står frem og fortæller om hvordan store danske virksomheder, som den Danske Bank Jyske Bank snyder deres kunder, bliver ikke forfremmet.
Anette Kirkeby der er uddannet i Jyske Bank et godt eksempel på hvordan man arbejder sig op og bliver forfremmet i Jyske Bank,
Vi synes dog ikke om at Anette Kirkeby sendte os til afvikling, grundet et oplyst lån, som Jyske Banks koncern i et årti har løjet hjemtaget
Og at lederen i jyske Bank Helsingør Anette Kirkeby heller ikke fortalte, at Jyske Bank selv 16-07-2008 har lavet en rente swap, til det underlæggende lån, i Nykredit som altså ikke findes.
Anette Kirkeby gør kun som Jyske Banks bestyrelse ønsker at drive deres forretninger, og gøre Jyske Bank til danskerne foretrukne bank.
Så når Anette Kirkeby har tilbage holdt flere oplysninger, og hendes underordnet Nicolai Hansen også har været uærlige, og vel har gjort som Anette Kirkeby har sagt.
Vi regner med at Anette der har gjort som tidligere afdelings direktør Jyske Bank Søren Woergaard har krævet.
Og at ordene er kommet fra den absolutte top i Jyske Bank
Was head of business in 2013. Anette Kirkeby was subsequently promoted to department director
Siden Jyske Banks koncern afdeling i Helsingør snød mig, og valgte at udsætte mig for mandat svig og Bedrageri, har følgende ledende personer rykket lidt rundt, udtaler kunde i Jyske Bank Helsingør.
Syntes at Anette Kirkeby skulle undskylde hendes bemærkning, den dag hun sendte mig til afvikling i Silkeborg ved Birgit Bush Thuesen.
GLEMMER ALDRIG
Anette Kirkebys bemærkning
NU ER DU OGSÅ BLEVET EN DÅRLIG KUNDE.
Eller det blik Anette Kirkeby sendte da hun sendte mig til aflivning, med en af bankens lange knive.
“Husk det er også skrevet med humor”
Om nogle af de medvirkende i afdelingen.
Tidligere afdelings direktør Søren Woergaard er rykket til jyske Bank Hillerød erhverv, hvor Søren er
Afdelingsdirektør.
Tidligere erhvervs chef Anette Kirkeby, overtager stillingen som Afdelingsdirektør efter Søren Woergaard.
Erhverv sælgere Nicolai Hansen og Casper Dam Olsen er begge flyttet med Søren Woergaard
Til Hillerød.
On Banking News. www.banknyt.dk
You can read about the rotten foundation of the Danske Bank world.
And in the Danish financial sector, such as the Ministry of Finance and the Financial Supervisory Authority, you can follow board members, coming from the big Danish banks behind money laundering fraud and other things.
But when several board members are aware that their company, is doing stripes of illegals, such as the the overall board knows everything about, but also supports.
And when the state and state companies such as the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, also have these banks’ board members on their boards, board members who work for the parties of the people, then it becomes a problem for the entire Danish population.
But this is the case, and when the elite of power also has friendships at the top of the police, therefore it obviously works far out, too, if Crime done by the Danish banks, whether it is money laundering or simple fraud by the Jyske Bank, then it is highly unlikely that some of the Danish banks will be convicted.
When the police say they According to Danske Bank, it is a far cry, the board is hardly penalized, as it is one of the banks the state has financially supported with billions of Danish kroner.
If some serious fines come against some Danish banks, they will hardly come from Danish police.
Remember now.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Tuborg Blvd. 12, 2900 Hellerup
MARTIN KIRKEGAARD
DIREKTØR & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
It is a problem for legal certainty that some Danish lawyers appeared to be corrupt.
Which Lundgren’s lawyers seemed to be part of, although Partner Dan Terkildsen himself thinks Lundgren’s lawyers have done a great job!
Yes but for whom, it must be Jyske Bank A/S Lundgren’s lawyers have done a great job for.
🙁
Lundgrens writes himself.
We think and work as active partners in your reality.
But the reality is quite another, and sadly if Jyske Bank’s board has paid Lundgren’s lawyers return commission, not to present their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S,.
That in Denmark there are probably large corrupt law firms show, our case with great clarity
Lundgren’s lawyer partner company Cheated customer.
And instead helped counterparty Jyske Bank.
When Lundgren’s trial court failed to present the client’s charges against Jyske Bank’s group for gross fraud.
FRAUD & FALSE
Lundgrens Bestyrelse
Board of Directors
MICHAEL ALSTRØM
FORMAND
THOMAS KRÆMER
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
NINA RINGEN
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
TOBIAS VIETH
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
Bestyrelsesmedlem
Direktør & Chief Operating Officer
MARTIN KIRKEGAARD
DIREKTØR & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Klik on picture and se the organisation
/
Lundgrens advokat partner selskab
Snød kunde, og hjalp istedet modparten Jyske Bank.
Da Lundgrens sørgende for retten ikke fik fremlagt kundens anklager mod Jyske Banks koncern for groft bedrageri.
SVIG & FALSK
Måtte Klienten selv forsøge at være advokat, når nu Lundgrens viser sig at være blevet ansat for Jyske Bank.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Samtidig med at Lundgrens ved partner Dan Terkildsen advokater af en lille klient Skulle fører en svig og falsk sag mod Jyske Bank A/S
En falsk eller korrupt advokat er en trusse imod det danske juridiske samfund.
/
Lundgren’s lawyers have provided advice to Jyske Bank A/S in a large million transactions.
At the same time that Lundgren’s lawyers for a small client should file a fraud and false case against Jyske Bank A/S
Then be careful Lundgrens does also choose to work for the opposing part like here Jyske Bank.
And is habil.
In our fraud and falde case against Jyske Bank A/S 🏦.
Then Lundgrens chose to accept a million jobs, offered by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, just a few months after, Lundgrens took the assignment against Jyske Bank for fraud and false.
We fired Lundgrens 1 year after, when we discovered that Lundgren’s Partner Company real works for Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
And therefore directly in contravention of good lawyer custom, counteract us, and that our claims against Jyske Bank were not presented to the courts.
Therefore, we would like to warn you as a client in Lundgrens, as we believe they have received a return commission from Jyske Bank A/S, to help Jyske Bank A/S
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
If Lundgrens Partners, or Partner such as Dan Terkildsen himself, believes that Lundgren’s lawyer partner company has not received “Return Commission”
” bribe” from Jyske Bank A/S, for failing, to submit their client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank in court.
Remember now.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Lundgrens advokater skulle fremlægge en sag for Bedrageri MOD JYSKE BANKS Koncern
Men Lundgrens ender med at blive ansat af Jyske Bank A/S
Claims Lundgrens received on February 5, 2018
We ask that partner in Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen himself
Explain whether Lundgren’s attorneys, have presented the court their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank.
Claims that their client has continuously written to Lundgren’s attorneys.
And given Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie, Emil instructions to present.
Or has Lundgren’s direct in against the Client’s instructions, chosen to counter the client’s fraud allegations were presented to the courts.
Lundgren’s Attorneys follow the bank news
BANKING NEWS BANKNYT LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
If Jyske Bank’s management has problems complying with laws, the Board of Directors must be replaced and Jyske Bank comes under tight supervision.
A bank that does fraud or is criminal, is harmful to Danish business.
Therefore the Financial Supervisory Authority should like to investigate all reports of fraud in Danish banks, but it just does not happen.
Where both Nykredit and Jyske bank ran to sell high-risk loans as the best and which in the past were declared safe without risk
And know well, what is said here, but please help Lundgren’s lawyers find these 14 questions for Lundgrens.
1. Has Lundgrens received material that the client requests presented.
2. Has Lundgrens received material more than once.
3. How many times has the client written that Lundgrens must present their client’s case as Fraud.
4. After Lundgren’s lawyers on February 5, 2018, Lundgren’s attorneys were contacted by some of Jyske Bank’s group regarding the execution of counseling for Jyske Bank.
5. Have Lundgren’s lawyers investigated whether Lundgren’s lawyers could work for Jyske Bank, after Lundgrens got the case against Jyske Bank for Fraud.
6. Lundgren’s lawyers choose to say yes to Jyske Bank’s request to advise Jyske Bank in trading for about 600,000,000 dkk.
7. Lundgren’s lawyers choose not to inform their client who has given Lundgren’s lawyers a fraud case against Jyske Bank.
8. Has partner Dan Terkildsen on August 13, 2019 who has the case against Jyske Bank for fraud, said that Dan Terkildsen does not know if some of Lundgren’s lawyers work for Jyske Bank.
9. If Lundgren’s lawyers work for Jyske Bank A/S and have received millions of dkk to advise Jyske Bank’s board.
Can Lundgren’s lawyers then file a fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S, while Jyske Bank pays Lundgren’s millions in fees to help Jyske Bank.
10. Why have Lundgren’s attorneys not repaid, the fee transferred by the client to Lundgren’s attorneys, for leading the Client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S
when Lundgren’s attorneys are characterized by the fact that Lundgren’s attorneys, have acted wrongly here and have acted against good attorney’s practice.
11. Has Emil, March 22, 2018, confirm the Client’s 9 witnesses.
12. Has Emil received information on March 22, 2018 that the case must be presented as a fraud, and has Emil confirmed by telephone, that the case is a fraud case against Jyske Bank.
13. At a later stage, Emil was asked by phone “You know that this is a case of fraud”, and Emil has verbally confirmed this to the Client.
14. If Lundgren’s lawyers were given instructions that the client would have, for example, these witnesses from Jyske Bank’s group, and 1 lawyer from Nykredit summoned.
Such as Anders Christian Dam, Philip Baruch, Morten Ulrik Gade and Mette Egholm Nielsen. as item 11. March 22, 2018 deals with.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
We can be contacted on +4522227713
And if it is the former client who just misunderstood Lundgren’s honesty.
Then we would like to share the additions Lundgren’s lawyers and of course also Jyske Bank’s group.
As well as Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys’ comments on the case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
We have great confidence in our new and third lawyer in the case BS-402/2015-VIB Submits our allegations against Jyske Bank in a statement of claim, following our closing reply 28/10-2019
Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen Bliver ny formand for bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank A/S,
Mens Bente Overgaard tidligere Nykredit direktør og Board Member kommer i Jyske Banks bestyrelse.
/
Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen Becomes new chairman of the board of Jyske Bank A/S, While Bente Overgaard former Nykredit director and Board Member joins Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors
The Small Fraud Customer in Jyske Bank is up against an apparent criminal organization that does not refuse to commit fraud against the bank’s own customers.
And when we think of dialogue with Jyske Bank’s group, the only thing we have tried, but dialogue hears not among Jyske Bank’s values.
Carsten Skaarup siger at det kræver humor at kæmpe mod en organisation som tilsyneladende er så dybt kriminel som Jyske Bank A/S, og vil synke så dybt som Jyske Banks koncern i denne her svig sag.
/
The customer from the hospital from the first emergency hospital on 26-11-2009 after a major brain hemorrhage.
Carsten Skaarup says it takes humor to fight against an organization that is apparently as deeply criminal.
And will sink as deep as Jyske Bank’s group in this fraud case, as Jyske Bank’s group.
The deceived customer of Jyske Bank, likes to make fun of himself, in this fight against a thief who makes Capone fade.
Eller måske ikke er enige i vores anklager mod jyske bank for groft bedrageri.
Når en enkelt bedraget kunde i jyske bank, udstiller sig selv for den mægtige, men bedrageriske jyske banks ledelse.
Kunde siger til jyske Banks ordstyrende formand Anders Dam Du er fejl og en ussel kujon, hvis ikke du tør gå i dialog med de kunder jyske bank udsætter for svindel
/
A tenacity and humor even the management of Jyske bank must laugh at
When a single deceived customer in Jyske bank exposes himself to the powerful but deceptive Jyske bank’s management.
Customer says to Jyske Bank’s chairman Anders Dam You are wrong and a lousy coward, if you dare not enter into dialogue with the customers Jyske bank exposes to Fraud.
The Danish elite who manage Denmark’s largest companies have many connections, and not only from the lodge are friend services well known.
Is Russian Organized Crime the link between the Danske Bank money laundering scandal and the Novichok poisoning of ex-Russian spy Sergei Skripal?
Financial transactions flowing through Danske Bank’s Estonia branch now totaling 200 billion euros
Corruption stories surrounding Nord Stream 1 and 2, Gazprom and Putin’s inner circle prove that the more money Kremlin gets, the bigger is the reduction of democracy in Russia
Goldman Sach’s investment adventure in Dong ends with a plus DKK 12.4 billion.
Klik her og læs
THE FINANCIAL TIMES
Banking News is a diary about Jyske Bank’s Fraud and about a small customer from Hornbaek Denmark, who is up against Denmark’s largest and most powerful friends, who no one wants to help the client stop the ongoing fraud.
Når Sven Buhrkall træder ud af bestyrelsen, og Kurt Bligaard Pedersen overtager hans post, sigter bestyrelsen efter at indlemme 55-årige Bente Overgaard som nyt bestyrelsesmedlem.
Hun har tidligere været koncerndirektør i Nykredit i otte år.
Måske grundet Jyske Bank og Nykredit leger godt sammen, og Nykredit’s advokat Mette Egholm Nielsen i 2016 derfor siger at Nykredit, ikke ville levere skyts imod Jyske Banks koncern.
Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen doesn’t think he was fired as boss in Dong himself, but that it was just time to try something new.
When Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen becomes chairman of Jyske Bank, Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen is already informed of the fraud Jyske bank exposes the bank’s customer, and fraud that the Jyske Bank’s overall board supports is Jyske Bank’s way of making millions.
When Jyske Bank chooses board members such as Kurt Bligaard Pedersen.
Who is at the top of Gazprom, which is already well known for money laundering and bribery, it does very well fit Jyske Bank’s values and foundations well.
When Jyske Bank chooses board members such as Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, who is at the top of Gazprom, which is known for money laundering and bribery, it does well fit Jyske Bank’s foundations.
How many people and companies cover Jyske Bank’s fraud against the bank’s own customers.
How many more than us, do Jyske Bank A/S expose to fraud?
The Group’s fraud situation is thus well known by the overall Board of Directors, which at least since May 2016, has continuously received inquiries from the customer of Jyske Bank.
Who has begged Jyske Bank and the Board of Directors to investigate whether the customer has taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000 as offered. 20-05-2008 in Nykredit.
Jyske Bank’s employees such as Nicolai Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen, Anette Kirkeby are in bad faith when Jyske Bank A/S repeatedly says
That the customer has taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, and so 16-07-2008 has agreed with Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade to make a new SWAP of DKK 4,328,000 for this loan.
Department Director Jyske Bank’s branch in Helsingoer. Anette Kirkeby just gives Carsten one last remark, on the way to the green butcher with out the door.
As Anette Kirkeby says. YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN A BAD CUSTOMER
And this loan 4.328.000 DKK in Nykredit is interest swapped, with an interest rate Swap 4.328.000 DKK in Jyske Bank on top.
But you can rely on Jyske Bank’s employees.
er 2 individuelle aftaler
—-
Det underlægende lån, som oplyst i Bilay 30. findes ikke
Jyske bank lyver for retten
Jyske bank har ikke forstået noget underlæggende lån i Nykredit
Nej Philip Baruch for der findes ingen lån på 4.328.000 kr.
—–
VI SIGER JYSKE BANK LYVER SOM BARE FANDEN
At Jyske bank har ikke tilbage holdt oplystninger
Jyske bank Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager påstår at banken ikke laver svig
med Jyske Bank 15-07-2008
til lån 4.328.000 DKK tilbud Bilag Y.
Philip Baruch skriver at jyske Bank først har lavet Swapen den 16-07-2008
Philip Baruch fremlægger også Bilag D.
Hvor Casper Dam Olsen påstår at bankes kunde har omlagt det bagvedliggende lån på 4.328.000 DKK Bilag Y. for Swappen Bilag 1.
Philip Baruch nægter at bevise at kunden har hjemtaget noget lån på 4.328.000 DKK. I Nykredit.
Philip Baruch skriver i retsforhold at kunden har bevisbyrden, og derfor må kunden selv bevise hvis kunden ikke har lånt de 4.328.000 DKK og lavet en rente swap på 4.328.000 DKK og derefter så omlagt det for Swappen bagvedliggende lån, som Jyske Bank har påstået.
Vi ved nu at Jyske Bank Philip Baruch kendte til at Koncernen løj over for retten.
At det underliggende lån for Swappen Bilag 1. Aldrig har eksisteret.
Dette viste Anette Kirkeby afdelings leder i Jyske Bank Helsingor
Lederen i Jyske Bank Anette Kirkeby og Nicolai Hansen
Viste også at den af kunden lavet Swap, til hvis tilbuddet på 4.328.000 dkk Bilag Y. Bliver hjemtaget, ikke er Bilag 1.
Den Swap Jyske Bank har lavet og fået godkendt 15-07-2008 er Bilag E. Side 4 og 5. Fremlagt af Jyske Bank.
Og denne lukkes 30-12-2008
Bemærk at lånet Bilag Y. 4.328.000 DKK
er en falsk påstand
Rente swap af 15-07-2008 lukkes 30-12-2008
En låne ret ( det er ikke et lån )
Konto for Swappen Bilag E. Side 4 og 5.
Denne konto lukker Jyske bank ikke da Swappen Bilag E. Side 4 og 5. Lukkes 30-12-2008. Ved Bilag 29.
En årsopgørelse fra 2008
Måske kan
1. Advokat Philip Baruch fra Lund Elmer Sandager
2. Advokat Morten Ulrik Gade fra Jyske Bank
3. Ordstyrerende formand CEO Anders Dam
Forklare hvor aftale bilag E. Side 4 og 5.
Og Bilag 29. Er på denne års opgørelse
Selv om Bestyrels medlem Philip Baruch
Og advokat Morten Ulrik Gade har kendt til Bilag 29. Og Bilag E. Side 4 og 5.
Men ved et uheld kommer Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater til at fremlægge et Bilag som banken har bort skaffet, og har indlagt at oplyse retten om, naturligvis for at skuffe i retsforhold.
I den danske straffelov har dette et navn
DOKUMENTFALSK
Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater lyver så over for retten igen og siger Jyske Bank bare har byttet er Bilag ud, og det uden aftale.
Og også her tilbage holder Jyske Bank oplysninger om at Swappen Bilag E. Side 4 og 5. Ikke er byttet ud
Jysk bank satser på at kunden ikke har Bilag 29.
Hertil tager Jyske Bank fejl
Kunden har Bilag 29.
Når Bestyrels medlem Philip Baruch, Fremlægger Bliag B. Som om bilag er lavet til Bilag 1.
Så lyver Philip Baruch igen.
skrive til retten at Jyske Bank bare 16-07-2008 har byttet Bilag E. Side 4 og 5. Ud med Bilag 1.
Så Lyver Jyske Bank og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater overfor domstolene.
Samtidig tilbage holder Jyske Bank også oplysninger om at Bilag 29. Den 30-12-2008 Lukker Swappen fra 15-07-2008 Bilag E. Side 4 og 5
1. Der er altså ikke tale om at bare bytte et bilag ud.
2. Der findes ingen aftaler 16-07-2008 om en ny SWAP
3. Jyske Bank tilbage holder oplysninger for at skuffe i retsforhold
4. Bilag 1. Er falsk
Det er ikke aftalt
Og lånet Jyske bank påstår er optaget findes ikke.
Selv om Jyske bank har lavet Mandatsvig
Hævet provinsen af et Lån på 4.328.000 DKK
Hæver garanti for et lån på 4.328.000 DKK
Velvidende at projektet var kaseret
Tilbudet er udløbet
Den begrænsede fuldmagt til tilbudet er udløbet
Og alligevel ingurer Jyske Bank brevet fra Nykredit 06-05-2009 til Jyske Bank hvor der tydeligt står
Tidligere tilbud og pantebrev er bortfaldet.
Jyske Bank og Bestyrelsen er kontinuerligt i ond tro.
Vælger at 16-07-2008 at lave en ny og ekstra swap også på 4.328.000 dkk.
Uden også at lave en konto til denne som Bilag B. Er lavet for Swappen Bilag E. side 4 og 5.
Men vælger at manipulere med aftale bilag, er Jyske Bank ude på et skråplan.
Jyske Banks bestyrelse har siden maj 2016 nægtet at bevise noget og slet ikke have nogen dialog.
Der findes ingen lån på 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit
Dette skriver advokat Mette Egholm Nielsen 16-10-2016
Der har aldrig været noget bagvedliggende lån på 4.328.000 DKK, som Jyske Bank har løjet om, både løjet for pengeinstitutankenævnet, løjet over for retten om.
Det er altså kontinuerligt at Jyske Banks ansatte om det er advokater, medlemer af bestyrelsen, ansatte lyver
It is therefore continuous that Jyske Bank’s employees, whether lawyers, members of the board, employees lie
It may well be one of the reasons that both
The Ministry of Finance
The Danish Financial Supervisory Authority
The Ministry of Justice, the State Attorney
The Police
And many more at Jyske Bank and the management are together, to expose a customer in Jyske Bank to continued fraud.
And everyone chooses to keep their mouths and thus passively support Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
–
Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade 9. in Copenhagen
Do you have a good explanation for why Jyske Bank just laughs at us
Is Jyske Bank protected by the state and there foredont can cheat them the Group will
Then to tell the sick customer that he has rescheduled, the underlying loan for Swapen, but not least is it evil belief, that department director Anette Kirkeby, sends the client to settlement.
To take everything from the customer owned by the Skaarup family from Hornbaek.
Knowing that the customer has never borrowed the 4,328,000 dkk which Jyske Bank has to date raised a few million for interest.
Try to read Appendix Y. 20-05-2008 and Appendix AG. 06-05-2009. Both offers have been sent to Jyske Bank’s branch in Helsingør.
And see if Offer Appendix Y. has been canceled or if it has been taken home and rescheduled, just as Board member Philip Baruch has presented it in court.
Or is it as the customer of Jyske Bank has repeatedly asked Lundgren’s lawyers to submit, 2 offers for 2 different projects, 2 different plot of land, and 2 different budgets.
Or did the customer make a project 2. As a customer in 2009 made a budget for, and asked Nicolai Hansen to get a new offer for this.
At Jyske Bank without valid authority, and directly against the client’s instructions, first tried to take the offer instead the rejected project from 2008 shows only Jyske Bank’s real values.
The case against Jyske Bank is basically about the foundation of Jyske Bank based on running a fraudulent banking business. and whether anyone can rely on anyone at Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors or group management at all.
If a customer made the same kind of Document Counterfeit and Fraud against Jyske Bank, it would probably not be long before the customer was in jail.
And whether the customer has subsequently rescheduled this loan by Jyske Bank to another loan.
The customer has also continuously begged Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors to respond and prove to the customer that the customer has agreed and approved an interest rate Swap 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000 for the underlying loan issued by Jyske Bank of 4,328,000 dkk
But the Jyske Bank Group has refused any form of dialogue.
Har Jyske Banks bestyrelse kunne gribe ind, og stanse bankens million svindel mod kunde, efter denne mail har den samlede bestyrelse nægtet at have dialog.
Until Jyske Bank’s Fraud is discovered, Jutland Bank will respond, even if the Group covers several fraudulent transactions or fraud cases if you want
Lawyer Morten Ulrik Gade Jyske Bank writes 17-11-2015 and proposes dialogue to avoid future misunderstandings
Jyske Bank’s CEO refuses to talk to us, deliberately make Jyske Bank’s group a million fraud cases, and Jyske Bank behaves fraudulently.
Jyske Banks bestyrelses lukker i
Bente Overgaard, Anker Laden-Andersen, Per Schnack, Sven Buhrkall, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, Rina Asmussen, Philip Baruch, Jens A Borup, Keld Norup, Christina Lykke Munk, Haggai Kunisch, Johnny Christensen, Marianne Lillevang, Anders Dam , Leif F Larsen , Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
In legal matters where Jyske Bank has been sued, Jyske Bank’s board member Philip Baruch has submitted.
That it is the client himself who has the burden of proof, this is thus understood.
The customer must prove himself that he has not borrowed the DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, which Jyske Bank has claimed, and which Jyske Bank has refused to prove has been repatriated.
Philip Baruch har fremlagt flere usandheder, i sagen BS-402/2015 for at skuffe i retsforhold.
Det at lyve er for Jyske Banks koncern helt i orden, også selv om Jyske Banks bestyrelse har fået mulighed for indrømme løgn og svig
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
It is this case that JYSKE BANK’s entire board repeatedly refuses to help investigate.
The question of whether Jyske Bank A/S exposes the customer to deliberate fraud, or whether some in Jyske Bank’s group, is responsible for Jyske Bank making fraud, lying in legal relationships, using forgery, using bribery, etc.
The customer says that even though the loan is DKK 4,328,000, the customer has been taken home and the customer has agreed with Jyske Bank that the bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade 16-07-2008 that Jyske Bank will make a SWAP more of DKK 4,328,000. For the alleged underlying loan.
Although Jyske Bank’s alleged underlying loan has been taken up and rescheduled, Jyske Bank has demanded this alleged loan be compulsorily reduced, by demanding the sale of a building plot.
Regardless of Jyske Bank refusing to have anything to do with the sale of Bybjergvej 45, and regardless of Jyske Bank refusing to open a deposit account, and Jyske Bank refusing to receive the proceeds, thus reducing the outstanding debt in Nykredit, after Jyske Bank itself wanted the repayers mortgage security for Nykredit.
If the customer claims that Jyske Bank has in this way forcibly reduced the alleged underlying, and then alleged, restructured loans, without letting Swappen follow the loan, and that Jyske Bank therefore exposes the customer to completely deliberate Fraud.
And this Fraud is supported by the entire Board of Directors and Executive Board of Jyske Bank
Partneren som lod os tro at Dan Terkildsen ikke viste at Lundgrens Partner Niels Gram-Hanssen stod for rådgivning af Jyske Banks koncern salg af ejendomme for 600.000.000 DKK.
DAN DU ER IKKE TIL AT STOLE PÅ
DU HAR LØJET FOR LUNDGRENS KLIENTER
Dan Terkildsen du uærligt når du / Lundgrens har planlagt at du ville møde op til en hovedforhandling, uden at have fremlagt nogle af de påstande Lundgrens klient har skrevet kontinuerligt siden Lundgrens advokater blev ansat.
Dette kan kun være for at du ville tabe sagen mod Jyske Banks koncern, uden at have fremlagt den
Du og Lundgrens advokater har overtrådt god advokat skik, optrådt uetisk og uredligt overfor os.
Hvordan Lundgrens advokater kan skrive de ikke vil tilbagebetale de penge vi har overført til Lundgrens advokater, for at fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank, når Lundgrens advokater intet har fremlagt retten.
Dan Terkildsen Lundgrens siger at Lundgrens har lavet et stort arbejde for os ?
HVAD ?
I HAR FEMLAGT 3 X 3 SIDER UDEN AT HAVE VORES PÅSTANDE MED.
I har sendt nota på 185.000 DKK
Uden at have fremlagt vores påstande
Hvilket nota vi også har gjort indsigelse mod
Flere har sagt i Jyske Bank og Lundgrens advokater sammen har planlagt at tørre os af for penge.
I Lundgrens advokater med kæmpe regninger for ingen ting.
Og at Jyske Bank ved at fortsætte Bedrageri, som der er flere forhold af, eksempel at tvinge et lån afdraget og blive med at hæve renter af af det beløb lånet er blevet afdraget med, efter tvang fra Jyske Banks med arbejder Søren Woergaard, Anette Kirkeby, Casper Dam Olsen Jyske Bank Helsingor.
Tvang som den grønne slagter selvfølgelig også nægter.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
Bilag E. Side 1 Banken nægter krav om salg af byggegrund.
Dette brev bliver fremlagt retten 10-09-2015
I det svarkrift Jyske Bank Philip Baruch Bestyrels medlem fremlægger, før kunde i 2016 opdager at Jyske Banks bestyrelse åbenlyst støtter bankens million svindel.
Ja øknomien er stram, når man af Jyske Bank udsættes for svig.
De næste billeder er de få skriftlig mail, som Birgit Bush Thuesen omtaler som en opfordring
Jyske Bank overvejer frasalg af byggegrund
Jyske Bank skriver det bliver et krav at byggegrund bliver sat til salg.
Casper Dam Olsen og Anette Kirkeby
Jyske Bank Casper Dam Olsen
Forventer at der er taget kontakt til 2 ejendommensmægler.
Casper Dam Olsen og Anette Kirkeby
Grunden skal sættes til salg ved mægler
Da kunden er i et seriøst afhængigheds forhold,
Grunden Jyske Banks svigforretninger, sætter Jyske Banks leder sikkerhedsstillelse op med 100 %
Jyske Bank ønsker at knække deres kunde økonomisk
Søren Woergaard og Casper Dam Olsen
Salg af grund og privat ejendom
Jyske Bank Casper Dam Olsen
ønsker at vi kontakter Helsingor kommune
Om et tilbageslag.
Det er efter dette salg at Jyske Bank nægter at oprette en deponeringskonto, hvorfor der går over 3 år før Helsingor kommune kan komme til at betale for grunden
Casper Dam Olsen beder nykredi om at Jyske Bank får provenuet efter salg af grund.
Casper Dam Olsen har vist glemt at det var Jyske Bank der, lavede og gave Nykredit oprykkerne pant i den solgte grund, det var også Jyske Bank som selv har tinglyst oprykkerne pant til Nykredit.
Casper Dam Olsen
Nu vil Jyske Bank have at kunden ringer til Nykredit, så Jyske Bank ved hvornår pengene kommer
Herefter nægter jyske Banks slagter mester at modtage provenuet efter salget af grunden
Vil blive delt.
Vi har måtte kæmpe i mod vores advokater Lundgrens advokat partner selskab
Hvor Partner Dan Terkildsen gjorder alt for at fjerne vores påstande, eller spørger for svig påstande mod Jyske Bank ikke blev fremlagt.
Kun derfor har vi selv Fremlægge dette amatør skrevet, afsluttende svarkrift.
Bilag 56. 19-08-2013
Nu er det slager afdelingen i Jyske Bank
ved Birgit Bush Thuesen der kommer med flere krav.
Samtidig med at Jyske Bank Birgit Bush Thuesen nægter at have noget med salg af byggegrund.at gøre
Kræver Jyske Bank flere og flere sikkerheder for gammel gæld.
Alene i perioden fra Jyske Banks tvangssalg, altså det Jyske Bank benægter at have noget med at gøre, til det efter 3 år lykkes kunden at få Nykredit til at modtage provenuet, hæver jyske bank over 250.000 kr. I renter af provenuet.
Læs side 5. I vores afsluttende svarkrift
Vi har i flere år siden 2016. bet Rødstenen advokater og Lundgrens advokater, fremlægge dette for retten, men, stod med tilsyneladende korrupte advokater i Lundgrens, der varetog Jyske Banks interesser, så vi får først fremlagt vores sag, 28-10-2019
Da vi har fyret Lundgrens advokater og selv Fremlægger vores påstande mod Jyske Banks koncern
When Jyske Bank denies having demanded the sale sale of land.
And that Jyske Bank, Refusing to receive the sales price after the sale, afterwards refusing to have any of the sales to do.
In addition to the many written requirements, Casper Dam Olsen called almost daily, to move the customer, and break down the customer mentally and financially.
Birgit Bush Thuesen Jyske Bank mener ikke banken har handler ansvarspådragende, omkring salg af byggegrund, og nægtet at modtage provenuet bagefter.
Thus, Jyske Bank and the Board treat their customers who are exposed to fraud.
You Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren’s attorneys have violated good attorney practice, acted unethically and dishonestly against us.
Due to the case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
Where Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys and partner such as Philip Baruch, knowingly lies in legal matters.
And where partner Philip Baruch has presented the court false and manipulated evidence, to disappoint in legal matters.
We asked Henrik Høpner the Lawyer.
There is an expert in criminal law, and since we at LES.dk have their own law book, Henrik could help us.
And see the case through, explaining why the law should be interpreted, also for Henrik Høpner to clean up the rotten foundation that some of Lund Elmer Sandager’s partner seemed to be part a of.
Henrik Høpner never answers.
Thinking that Henrik Høpner does not believe that there is anything wrong with lying to the court, when it is Philip Baruch who is partner with Henrik Høpner.
And that is why all the lawyers in Lund Elmer Sandager will at all times cover rotten lawyers, and partner in Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater.
We again ask Henrik Høpner to investigate, whether the company LES.dk Henrik Høpner is a partner in, which Philip Baruch has submitted to the court tampered documents, and presented falsehoods to disappoint in legal matters.
We know that Philip Baruch wrote in February 2019 to Lundgren’s partner Dan Terkildsen, and claims it is a criminal offense, to mention Henrik Høpner’s name.
So, for good measure, we have no idea whether Henrik helped Philip Baruch interpret the law as Lund Elmer Sandager Lawyer interpreted it.
WE ONLY PRAY FOR HENRIK HØPNER TO HELP
We do not blame Henrik Høpner for anything, but when our lawyers in Lundgrens worked for Jyske Bank’s interests, we could not get help with it.
Which the individual Board members are otherwise offered to admit several times.
Just as the board refuses to stop the bank’s continued fraud against the bank’s customer, who tries with humor to enter into dialogue with Jyske Bank’s board.
NO
There may well be some who thought, we were weird about trying to get into a dialogue with Jyske Bank A/S.
And getting in dialogue with Lund Elmer Sandager as openly, helps Jyske Bank’s board of directors to continue Jyske Bank’s fraud business.
This is how it looks.
But we also ask that Jyske Bank’s board of directors, in association with the bank’s fraud, to meet with us, and help us understand why Jyske Bank A/S is deceiving us.
When we clearly write to Attorney Morten Ulrik Gade at Jyske Bank on May 18, 2016.
And again on May 19, 2016 to CEO Chairman Anders Christian Dam.
And say we do not believe we have borrowed DKK 4,328,000. and that we are probably just facing a huge fraud.
It is strange that Jyske Bank’s board refuses us dialogue, but instead chooses to keep mouths, and several times change explanation to the court.
While the group’s board of directors wants to expose the customer to fraud.
Hvis der bare var tale om en fejl
Ville Jyske Bank forlængst have rettet op.
Det må være magtpåliggende for Bankens Bestyrels at fortsætte med at lave bedrageri mod os.
If it was just a mistake Would Jyske Bank long ago have corrected.
It must be a matter of power for the Bank’s Board of Directors to continue to commit fraud against us.
Oplys AKTIONÆRENE om de vil hjælpe koncernledelsen, med at få øje på dette opslag, så vi ikke skal vente på en dommer stopper Danmarks anden største bank i at bedrage kunder
This here Fraud that Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors wants to continue with fraud, it’s also happens the same time that DR news comes with more information that Jyske Bank has helped 2,000 to avoid paying taxes in Denmark, and has given advice to DR staff how they could cheat in taxes
Gælden februar 2020 er 1003.000 DKK
Efter jyske bank tvang kunde sælge byggegrund og dermed tvangs nedbringe gæld Imens hæver jyske bank fortsat renter af 2.726.023,47 kr I alt kr. 75.006,16
Selv om Jyske Banks bestyrelse november 2018 overfor retten ændre forklaring til at den Swap på 4.328.000 DKK Bilag 1. Som Jyske Bank har lavet 16-07-2008 er lavet efter aftale med kunden, da Jyske Banks Bestyrels medlem Philip Baruch påstår at det var magtpåliggende at lave en SWAP, til det projekt som ingen, heller ikke kunden kendte til.
På dette tidspunkt ved kunden ikke at deres advokater Lundgrens Partner Selskab er blevet købt af Jyske Banks bestyrelse, og derfor sandsynligvis korrupte.
Hvilket vel nok er grunden til at Lundgrens Partner Selskab direkte imod kundens instrukser, ikke har fremlagt nogle af klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Banks Koncern.
På engelsk lige under.
Hvilket er stadig er BEDRAGERI AF FØRSTE GRAD
Although Jyske Bank’s Supervisory Board in November 2018 before the court change explanation.
That the Swap of DKK 4,328,000 Appendix 1. As Jyske Bank has made 16-07-2008 and is made in agreement with the customer.
As Jyske Bank’s Board member Philip Baruch states that it was in charge of making a SWAP, for the project.
The projekt that no one, even the customer, knew about.
At this point, the client does not know that their lawyers Lundgren’s Partner Company was purchased by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
And therefore probably corrupt.
Which is probably why Lundgren’s Partner Company directly against the client’s instructions, has not submitted any of the client’s fraud allegations against the Jyske Bank Group.
og påstået rentesikring Bilag 1. 16-07-2008 på 4.328.000 kr. af dette lån
Så skulle være lavet og aftalt som den jyske svindler bank påstår overfor for retten.
Er jyske Banks ledelses answer, over bankens andre bedrageri forhold som her fortsat svibdel
ved at hæve renter af 2.726.023,47 kr.
Påstået 05-11-2018 at Bilag 1. Rentesikring fra 16-07-2008 nu er af det lån der blev optaget 03-07-2009 efter tilbud fra 06-05-2009 Rest gælden er 1.058.369,17 kr.
Efter jyske bank tvangs solgte grund
Som der er krævet mundtlig og skriftlig.
Casper Dam Olsen og Anette Kirkeby kræver også en salgs fuldmagt, hvis grunden ikke bliver solgt.
Men bagefter, sender Anette Kirkeby kunden til afvikling, og så benægter Jyske Banks ansatte og Lederer bagefter alt.
Det er sådan Jyske Banks bestyrelse ønsker at banken drives, hvilket er i direkte strid med Finanstilsynet regler for at få lov at drive bank forretninger i Danmark
Jyske Bank har efter at have udsat kunde for, Mandat svig, Dokumentfalsk, Misbrug af udløbet fuldmagt, Bedrageri, tvang og udnyttelse, sendt kunden til afvikling, det vil kalder for aflivning, for gøre det lidt sjovere.
Jyske Bank har på dette tidspunkt pant sikkerheder og sikkerhed i kundens aktiver for over 11.300.000 dkk. Kunden skylder under 3.000.000 dkk.
Dette kan du se i vores egen afleveret afsluttende svarkrift 28-10-2019
Søren Woergaard, Nicolai Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen and Anette Kirkeby know full well that the bank’s customer Carsten Skaarup has not borrowed DKK 4,328,000. in Nykredit.
And not 16-07-2008 has approved a Swap of 4,328,000 dkk. for this loan in Nykredit.
When Anette Kirkeby Jyske Bank Helsingor sends the bank’s customer to liquidate, The Bank’s Business Manager Anette Kirkeby
“Anette Kirkeby will soon be promoted to department director of Jyske Bank Helsingor.”
The customer therefore believes that the Bank’s employees have been in bad faith, and have been aware that Jyske Bank exposes customers to fraud.
As department director Søren Woergaard, and Business Advisers (Sales) Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen and business manager Kirkeby.
Choose to send the customer for final killing, at Jyske Bank’s head office, where Birgit Bush Thuesen stands ready, to take the last from their customer.
Such as demanding sales proxies on the client’s commercial property in Espergaerde, and private house in Hornbaek.
To secure Jyske Bank’s financial interests.
Why the police will not even talk to the customer, but instead rejected the customer’s police complaint against Jyske Bank for fraud, and against Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys to help Jyske Bank’s fraud can continue.
Which answers well with Lundgrens Partner calling us for an urgent meeting at Lundgrens, we meet as agreed.
The are 2 students waiting, Mette-Marie and Emil, Dan Terkildsen is somewhat late from some teaching in the cityhere
And a quarter of a minute later, Dan arrives by taxi that The taxi bill (and one more) has also been written on our bill clearly shows Lundgren’s lawyers are skilled, maybe a little too skilled.
The meeting itself was actually a waste of our time, Dan Terkildsen really only has 1 question
And so Lundgrens could have asked about it by phone
But when the company Lundgren’s lawyers can write time for 3 people only to ask if this is this loan DKK 4,328,000.
which we have not taken home, and points to mail copy from Nykredit 18-10-2016 Mette Egholm Nielsen.
Although it is very clear in the annexes, Dan Terkildsen says he just wanted to be safe.
We wasted probably 4 hours and then it was hardly free.
Og så Fremlægger 28-09-2018 som Bilag 18.
Dan writes to the court without Lundgren’s response, but we get a copy right after.
Dan har været sent ude, og skriver der var en tidsfrist der skulle holdes, derfor kunne vi ikke få det til godkendelse
På samme måde var det 18-12-2018
Og igen 02-09-2019 selv om vi klart skrev at intet måtte fremlægges retten uden Klienten først har godkendt.
Det glemte Lundgrens advokater lige at skrive til retten, nok derfor måtte vi ikke få noget til godkendelse.
Lundgrens advokater ville selv bestemme hvad Lundgrens advokater ville have påstanden var
Allerede her er Lundgrens advokater i gang med at modarbejde klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank må blive fremlagt.
Vores påstande mod Jyske Bank var ikke med i brevet
Lundgrens advokater har naturligvis også fået kopi af alle disse breve, hvilket vi skriver til Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens advokater, for at Bestyrelsen ikke kan undsige at være 100 % oplyst om det svig, bestyrelsen i forening støtter.
Er Lundgrens advokater blevet bestukket af Jyske Banks koncern, for ikke at kunne se eller læse og forstå et ord på 4 bogstaver
Svig.
Eller er det bare konspirationsteorier som Partner Dan Terkildsen siger.
Spørgsmålet er hvad har Jyske Bank betalt Lundgrens advokater MILLIONER skjult som Retur Kommision.
For at få Lundgrens advokater ikke måtte fremlægge klientens SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke har modtaget bestikkelse fra Jyske Banks ledelse, i form af retur kommision fra måske Jyske Banks bestyrelse CEO Anders Christian Dam, eller af Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater ved partner Philip Baruch, for ikke at fremlægge deres klients svig påstande mod Jyske Banks koncern ?
Så svar os på
Hvorfor Lundgrens ikke har fremlagt nogle af de svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S i har fået instruks om.
Og hvorfor vi selv 28-10-2019. har måtte fremlægge vores svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Til Lundgrens advokater
Kan du se der står vi påstår svig
Lundgrens advokater kan vist ikke læse og forstå det, efter Lundgrens Partner Selskab blev ansat af Jyske Banks bestyrelse
Spørgsmålet er hvad har Jyske Bank betalt Lundgrens advokater MILLIONER skjult som Retur Kommision
for at få Lundgrens advokater ikke måtte fremlægge klientens SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Til Lundgrens advokater
Kan du se der står vi påstår svig
Lundgrens advokater kan vist ikke læse og forstå det, efter Lundgrens Partner Selskab blev ansat af Jyske Banks bestyrelse
På dette tidspunkt ved vi ikke at Bilag 28-101 er blevet forhindret i at være fremlagt, eftersom Lundgrens advokater ikke svare os, og heller ikke deler retsbogen med os.
Lundgrens advokater ved at Bilag 28-101 fra december 2018 ikke er medtaget.
Alligevel skjuler Lundgrens advokater dette, selv om Emil telefonisk har bekræftet alle bilag vil blive medtaget i Viborg ret.
Emil skriver det også på en sms.
Problemet er bare retten har skrevet til Lundgrens advokater at retten ville se bort fra de af Klientens fremlagte bilag, hvilket Lundgrens advokater holder for sig selv.
Ingen af advokaterne i Lundgrens omtaler vores påstande, vidner eller bilag da Lundgrens advokater har deres egen dagsorden.