When law firms such as Lundgren's, Lund Elmer Sandager, Kromann Reumert, Horten and DLA Piper's lawyers are mentioned, read here which naming persons actually help Jyske Bank with the bank's organized fraud, and at the same time cover up the Danish corrupt Lundgren's lawyers. 🤫 Read also how members of the Danish Courts Agency, by Supreme Court Judge Kurt Rasmussen, have understood good practice for lawyers, and you will be surprised that Bribery / Return Commission is not against Danish law or against good legal practice.
12-02-2020 The question to you. Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt and does the Jyske Bank’s Group use bribery?. Jyske Bank gets new chairman of the board Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, who is already the top manager of the English department of Gazprom, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen’s friendship with Sergay A. Emeliyanov, deputy director of Gazprom, who is also known for money laundering which the Danske Bank became known for, the wires to Gazprom can strengthen the bank’s shabby image.
Remember that Lundgren’s lawyers must be corrupt
Since what we write and ask Lundgren to present here September 1, 2019.
And like Lundgrens, the day after September 2, 2019, is Lundgrens presented a chase as is 100% against the client’s instructions
Remember this is only one of maybe 100 letters and mails to Lundgrens where we ask them to present our case against Jysk Bank A/S Silkeborg Denmark
02-09-2019 1/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
See the letter and mail of September 1 and what Lundgrens presents to the court on September 2. and without wanting to share a copy with their client.
It must be Denmark’s biggest bribery case, where Denmark’s next largest bank Jyske Bank A/S has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to counter their client in order to disappoint in legal matters.
Or do the Danish Bank Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgrens have another explanation, then we would like it so that we can share it.
We do not want to accuse Lundgren’s lawyers of being a corrupt law firm.
We either want or accuse Jyske Bank A/S of being a criminal.
And we will not at all accuse Jyske Bank A/S of using bribes to prevent Lundgrens from presenting our allegations against Jyske Bank for false and fraud.
Now remember that conversation promotes the understanding of Anders Christian Dam If Jyske Bank has not bribed Lundgren’s “hidden as Return Commission” for Lundgrens, not to present their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske bank.
Then this entry in the journal banking news should of course be corrected.
This is just one example of the many times Lundgrens since February 5, 2018 And until Lundgrens was fired on September 25, 2019.
Where Lundgrens has, at its most serious, opposed the law, and that which the Danish lawyer community must protect, namely the trust in the Danish lawyers.
When Lundgrens has cheated on their client, and instead worked for the defendant Jyske Bank A/S, in Denmark’s most serious case of exploitation and fraud carried out by a large Danish bank A/S, it weakens confidence in the large Danish lawyer’s houses.
Quality and professionalism are the least you can expect from Lundgrens We couldn’t get Lundgren’s lawyers to help us. But got bills for DKK 185,000 for Lundgrens Partner Company, did not submit some of our fraud claims to Jyske Bank A / S We have asked Lundgrens to pay back every penny we have transferred to their account.
Here is the story of one of Denmark’s probably biggest fraud cases, where both banks and several lawyers companies, and many more are involved, a case that could be solved with dialogue, but Jyske Bank’s board does not want this.
In Denmark, some of the largest criminal organizations, such as the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S, choose to make fraud crimes against their own customers.
While the group’s powerful political friends have certainly banned the police, the state attorney, the Ministry of Justice from interfering.
When banks like here Jyske Bank A/S with the group management and in the saddle unit CEO Anders Christian Dam.
Who are consciously and openly behind the bank’s continued fraud against small business customer, who just want to get in touch and get in dialogue with Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors for help to settle the matter.
Unfortunately no authorities will talk or help us, since Jyske Bank’s Group and Management obviously has been able to buy our latest 2 Lawyers, as the company, Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, by partner Dan Terkildsen.
We cannot find other explanations that both attorneys, Dan Terkildsen and Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, against the client’s instructions, have not submitted any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.
The way Thomas Schioldan Sørensen has behaved several times, seen in the rearview mirror, has been to help Jyske Bank’s group disappoint in legal matters.
WHAT SHOULD WE DO? EVEN PRESENT OUR CLAIMS TO JYSKE BANK FOR FRAUD AND FALSE ?.
The small pea ant 🐜 cannot understand that the chairman of the large Danish bank, Jyske Bank A/S, refuses dialogue, while the group continues the bank’s million fraud against customer.
Anders Dam Call and let’s meet
your old boy, it’s just for fun.
Although someone from the Danish police department, has said that the case against Jyske Bank is political and therefore the Danish bank Jyske Bank will not be investigated for fraud.
It was difficult at that time to believe.
Selv om en fra bagmandspolitiet uden for referat har sagt, sagen imod Jyske Bank er politisk, og derfor vil Jyske Bank A/S ikke blive efterforsket for bedrageri, det var svært den gang at tro på.
But after seeing the political network that supports Jyske Bank A / S, it suddenly makes better sense.
Men efter at have set det politiske netværk, der støtter op om Jyske Bank A/S, giver det pludselig bedre mening.
Dan Terkildsen konservativ, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Socialdemokrat, er bare 2 magtfulde personer i dansk politik, der begge er dybt inde i den Jyske banks bedragerisag mod lille kunde, en kunde der selv i civil retten, må kæmpe for at stoppe Jyske Banks million svindel.
Har du spørgsmål til klienten der fyrede Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, ved Dan Terkildsen.
Efter at have opdaget, Jyske Banks koncern ledelse har betalt Lundgrens flere millioner danske kroner.
Og dermed har taget imod retur kommision fra Jyske Bank, for ikke at fremlægge deres klients svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Lundgrens må også gerne ringe 004522227713 hvis Lundgrens advokater har en anden forklaring på hvorfor Lundgrens advokater ikke har fremlagt nogle af klientens påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S, så skal det straks blive skrevet her.
Selv om advokat partner selskabet Lundgrens sikkert er ligeglade, om de kan være blevet bestukket, til ikke at fremlægge deres klients SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Så er det en trussel mod retssikkerheden, hvis advokater som Lundgrens advokat partner selskab direkte imod Klientens instrukser. ikke føre sagerne, som de er blivet ansat til.
Dan Terkildsen har tæt kontakt med Konservative folkepartis øverste top. Og var ordstyrer på deres års møde i 2019?
Så hvis Lundgrens advokater er blevet bestukket for at Dan Terkildsen ikke måtte fremlægge deres klients påstande mod Jyske Bank.
Så er det et stort problem
No customer in a bank should be afraid that some banks’ management wants to expose their customers to fraud.
But in Denmark there is every reason, not to trust some big danish banks.
The fight against Denmark’s probably most criminal bank, aided by corrupt lawyers.
Lundgren’s lawyers chose to directly counter the client’s fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S was presented to the court.
Which the client stated in the period February 5, 2018 to the Client in September 2019.
Lundgrens in no way complies with the customer’s instructions.
After the client on Lundgren’s website, has found very clear evidence that Lundgrens has entered into a million cooperation with Jyske Bank.
The client in Lundgrens is forced to kick out Lundgren’s lawyers, to have their fraud claims against Jyske Bank presented to the court.
Partner Dan Terkildsen refuses to repay the client’s money, as Dan Terkildsen believes Lundgren’s lawyers have done a great job for the Client.
Without getting into what Lundgren’s lawyers have done.
Since February 2016 we have cried and since May 2016 directly written to Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors and the Executive Board to stop the bank’s fraud crimes against their customers, but Jyske Bank A/S Anders Dam refuses.
If we make mistakes, or are we exposed to serious fraud done by Jyske Bank’s board in association.
Is the question clear enough, or else we would like to come to your plase CEO manager’s Anders Dam office, to review our questions and allegations against your Anders Dam Jyske Bank A/S.
For are we wrong, we of course also will write it, in this Diary.
To date, no one in the danish police, the Ministry of Justice, Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager, has wanted to say you are wrong.
Explaining that our evidence against Jyske Bank for Fraud, is not good enough.
It is a riddle to us for the police to help victim, and not criminals, here we have a case against Jyske Bank A/S, which is in a serious network.
Board members who move around between Denmark’s absolute largest companies there, some also owned by the Danish state.
We talk about very high-ranking and powerful friends, who surely do everything they can to be rewarded for helping Jyske Bank’s board prevent the client’s case from going to court.
Refusing to investigate Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.
As the State Attorney wrote, SVIG 🙂
It had to submit the client itself in civil court, just as the Financial Supervisory Authority does not want to investigate whether, a client is exposed to fraud in Jyske Bank.
Are there some threads between the Board of Jyske Bank and the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, the Parliament.
When the Ministry of Justice writes.
The state will not give free trial as it is a matter of having borrowed the 4,328,000 dkk. in Nykredit, so there is the small customer alone against one of Denmark’s largest organizations, David against Goliath. Follow our case and see evidence that Jyske Bank is a criminal.
We expect the case to go to the EU or the human rights courts.
As the legal security in Denmark does not look good, since a large Danish bank such as Jyske Bank can buy the counterparty’s lawyer Lundgrens, without any wrinkles.
If we have misunderstood something, then we would like to get in touch with the CEO and the management of Jyske Bank A/S.
And have a dialogue about this here.
Are there conspiracy theories, are they misunderstandings ?.
Dialogue promotes understanding, but Jyske Bank’s board of directors refuses dialogue.
So even though we, who are clients of the Danish bank Jyske Bank, may just be small stupid, and no one will read our about allegations against Jyske Bank here in the diary.
Neither Jyske Bank or Lundgrens can say, that we have not tried to enter into dialogue, with the apparently criminal Jyske Bank.
A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
New board members in Jyske Bank A/S both with legs in the danish Ministry of Finance.
Is there a connection between the State Attorney, the police, the Ministry of Justice, the government, does not want the largest Danish banks investigated for fraud and money laundering?.
And that the court has been informed that Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys.
By partner Philip Baruch has lied several times in legal matters, but as the court does not care, that Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys have openly lied in legal proceedings against Jyske Bank, to disappoint in legal matters.
You can read about the rotten foundation of the Danske Bank world.
And in the Danish financial sector, such as the Ministry of Finance and the Financial Supervisory Authority, you can follow board members, coming from the big Danish banks behind money laundering fraud and other things.
But when several board members are aware that their company, is doing stripes of illegals, such as the the overall board knows everything about, but also supports.
And when the state and state companies such as the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Finance, also have these banks’ board members on their boards, board members who work for the parties of the people, then it becomes a problem for the entire Danish population.
But this is the case, and when the elite of power also has friendships at the top of the police, therefore it obviously works far out, too, if Crime done by the Danish banks, whether it is money laundering or simple fraud by the Jyske Bank, then it is highly unlikely that some of the Danish banks will be convicted.
When the police say they According to Danske Bank, it is a far cry, the board is hardly penalized, as it is one of the banks the state has financially supported with billions of Danish kroner.
If some serious fines come against some Danish banks, they will hardly come from Danish police.
Goldman Sach’s investment adventure in Dong ends with a plus DKK 12.4 billion.
Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen doesn’t think he was fired as boss in Dong himself, but that it was just time to try something new.
When Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen becomes chairman of Jyske Bank, Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen is already informed of the fraud Jyske bank exposes the bank’s customer, and fraud that the Jyske Bank’s overall board supports is Jyske Bank’s way of making millions.
When Jyske Bank chooses board members such as Kurt Bligaard Pedersen.
Who is at the top of Gazprom, which is already well known for money laundering and bribery, it does very well fit Jyske Bank’s values and foundations well.
When Jyske Bank chooses board members such as Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, who is at the top of Gazprom, which is known for money laundering and bribery, it does well fit Jyske Bank’s foundations.
How many people and companies cover Jyske Bank’s fraud against the bank’s own customers.
How many more than us, do Jyske Bank A/S expose to fraud?
The Group’s fraud situation is thus well known by the overall Board of Directors, which at least since May 2016, has continuously received inquiries from the customer of Jyske Bank.
Who has begged Jyske Bank and the Board of Directors to investigate whether the customer has taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000 as offered. 20-05-2008 in Nykredit.
Jyske Bank’s employees such as Nicolai Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen, Anette Kirkeby are in bad faith when Jyske Bank A/S repeatedly says
That the customer has taken out a loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, and so 16-07-2008 has agreed with Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade to make a new SWAP of DKK 4,328,000 for this loan.
Department Director Jyske Bank’s branch in Helsingoer. Anette Kirkeby just gives Carsten one last remark, on the way to the green butcher with out the door.
And many more at Jyske Bank and the management are together, to expose a customer in Jyske Bank to continued fraud.
And everyone chooses to keep their mouths and thus passively support Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
Then to tell the sick customer that he has rescheduled, the underlying loan for Swapen, but not least is it evil belief, that department director Anette Kirkeby, sends the client to settlement.
To take everything from the customer owned by the Skaarup family from Hornbaek.
Knowing that the customer has never borrowed the 4,328,000 dkk which Jyske Bank has to date raised a few million for interest.
Try to read Appendix Y. 20-05-2008 and Appendix AG. 06-05-2009. Both offers have been sent to Jyske Bank’s branch in Helsingør.
And see if Offer Appendix Y. has been canceled or if it has been taken home and rescheduled, just as Board member Philip Baruch has presented it in court.
Or is it as the customer of Jyske Bank has repeatedly asked Lundgren’s lawyers to submit, 2 offers for 2 different projects, 2 different plot of land, and 2 different budgets.
Or did the customer make a project 2. As a customer in 2009 made a budget for, and asked Nicolai Hansen to get a new offer for this.
At Jyske Bank without valid authority, and directly against the client’s instructions, first tried to take the offer instead the rejected project from 2008 shows only Jyske Bank’s real values.
The case against Jyske Bank is basically about the foundation of Jyske Bank based on running a fraudulent banking business. and whether anyone can rely on anyone at Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors or group management at all.
If a customer made the same kind of Document Counterfeit and Fraud against Jyske Bank, it would probably not be long before the customer was in jail.
And whether the customer has subsequently rescheduled this loan by Jyske Bank to another loan.
The customer has also continuously begged Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors to respond and prove to the customer that the customer has agreed and approved an interest rate Swap 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000 for the underlying loan issued by Jyske Bank of 4,328,000 dkk
But the Jyske Bank Group has refused any form of dialogue.
Lawyer Morten Ulrik Gade Jyske Bank writes 17-11-2015 and proposes dialogue to avoid future misunderstandings
In legal matters where Jyske Bank has been sued, Jyske Bank’s board member Philip Baruch has submitted.
That it is the client himself who has the burden of proof, this is thus understood.
The customer must prove himself that he has not borrowed the DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, which Jyske Bank has claimed, and which Jyske Bank has refused to prove has been repatriated.
It is this case that JYSKE BANK’s entire board repeatedly refuses to help investigate.
The question of whether Jyske Bank A/S exposes the customer to deliberate fraud, or whether some in Jyske Bank’s group, is responsible for Jyske Bank making fraud, lying in legal relationships, using forgery, using bribery, etc.
The customer says that even though the loan is DKK 4,328,000, the customer has been taken home and the customer has agreed with Jyske Bank that the bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade 16-07-2008 that Jyske Bank will make a SWAP more of DKK 4,328,000. For the alleged underlying loan.
Although Jyske Bank’s alleged underlying loan has been taken up and rescheduled, Jyske Bank has demanded this alleged loan be compulsorily reduced, by demanding the sale of a building plot.
Regardless of Jyske Bank refusing to have anything to do with the sale of Bybjergvej 45, and regardless of Jyske Bank refusing to open a deposit account, and Jyske Bank refusing to receive the proceeds, thus reducing the outstanding debt in Nykredit, after Jyske Bank itself wanted the repayers mortgage security for Nykredit.
If the customer claims that Jyske Bank has in this way forcibly reduced the alleged underlying, and then alleged, restructured loans, without letting Swappen follow the loan, and that Jyske Bank therefore exposes the customer to completely deliberate Fraud.
And this Fraud is supported by the entire Board of Directors and Executive Board of Jyske Bank
When Jyske Bank denies having demanded the sale sale of land.
And that Jyske Bank, Refusing to receive the sales price after the sale, afterwards refusing to have any of the sales to do.
In addition to the many written requirements, Casper Dam Olsen called almost daily, to move the customer, and break down the customer mentally and financially.
Thus, Jyske Bank and the Board treat their customers who are exposed to fraud.
You Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren’s attorneys have violated good attorney practice, acted unethically and dishonestly against us.
There may well be some who thought, we were weird about trying to get into a dialogue with Jyske Bank A/S.
And getting in dialogue with Lund Elmer Sandager as openly, helps Jyske Bank’s board of directors to continue Jyske Bank’s fraud business.
This is how it looks.
But we also ask that Jyske Bank’s board of directors, in association with the bank’s fraud, to meet with us, and help us understand why Jyske Bank A/S is deceiving us.
Although Jyske Bank’s Supervisory Board in November 2018 before the court change explanation.
That the Swap of DKK 4,328,000 Appendix 1. As Jyske Bank has made 16-07-2008 and is made in agreement with the customer.
As Jyske Bank’s Board member Philip Baruch states that it was in charge of making a SWAP, for the project.
The projekt that no one, even the customer, knew about.
At this point, the client does not know that their lawyers Lundgren’s Partner Company was purchased by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
And therefore probably corrupt.
Which is probably why Lundgren’s Partner Company directly against the client’s instructions, has not submitted any of the client’s fraud allegations against the Jyske Bank Group.
Søren Woergaard, Nicolai Hansen, Casper Dam Olsen and Anette Kirkeby know full well that the bank’s customer Carsten Skaarup has not borrowed DKK 4,328,000. in Nykredit.
And not 16-07-2008 has approved a Swap of 4,328,000 dkk. for this loan in Nykredit.
When Anette Kirkeby Jyske Bank Helsingor sends the bank’s customer to liquidate, The Bank’s Business Manager Anette Kirkeby
“Anette Kirkeby will soon be promoted to department director of Jyske Bank Helsingor.”
The customer therefore believes that the Bank’s employees have been in bad faith, and have been aware that Jyske Bank exposes customers to fraud.
As department director Søren Woergaard, and Business Advisers (Sales) Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen and business manager Kirkeby.
Choose to send the customer for final killing, at Jyske Bank’s head office, where Birgit Bush Thuesen stands ready, to take the last from their customer.
Such as demanding sales proxies on the client’s commercial property in Espergaerde, and private house in Hornbaek.
To secure Jyske Bank’s financial interests.
Why the police will not even talk to the customer, but instead rejected the customer’s police complaint against Jyske Bank for fraud, and against Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys to help Jyske Bank’s fraud can continue.
Which answers well with Lundgrens Partner calling us for an urgent meeting at Lundgrens, we meet as agreed.
The are 2 students waiting, Mette-Marie and Emil, Dan Terkildsen is somewhat late from some teaching in the cityhere
And a quarter of a minute later, Dan arrives by taxi that The taxi bill (and one more) has also been written on our bill clearly shows Lundgren’s lawyers are skilled, maybe a little too skilled.
The meeting itself was actually a waste of our time, Dan Terkildsen really only has 1 question
And so Lundgrens could have asked about it by phone
But when the company Lundgren’s lawyers can write time for 3 people only to ask if this is this loan DKK 4,328,000.
which we have not taken home, and points to mail copy from Nykredit 18-10-2016 Mette Egholm Nielsen.
Although it is very clear in the annexes, Dan Terkildsen says he just wanted to be safe.
We wasted probably 4 hours and then it was hardly free.
Dan writes to the court without Lundgren’s response, but we get a copy right after.
Vores påstande mod Jyske Bank var ikke med i brevet
Lundgrens advokater har naturligvis også fået kopi af alle disse breve, hvilket vi skriver til Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens advokater, for at Bestyrelsen ikke kan undsige at være 100 % oplyst om det svig, bestyrelsen i forening støtter.
Er Lundgrens advokater blevet bestukket af Jyske Banks koncern, for ikke at kunne se eller læse og forstå et ord på 4 bogstaver
Eller er det bare konspirationsteorier som Partner Dan Terkildsen siger.
Spørgsmålet er hvad har Jyske Bank betalt Lundgrens advokater MILLIONER skjult som Retur Kommision.
For at få Lundgrens advokater ikke måtte fremlægge klientens SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke har modtaget bestikkelse fra Jyske Banks ledelse, i form af retur kommision fra måske Jyske Banks bestyrelse CEO Anders Christian Dam, eller af Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater ved partner Philip Baruch, for ikke at fremlægge deres klients svig påstande mod Jyske Banks koncern ?
Så svar os på
Hvorfor Lundgrens ikke har fremlagt nogle af de svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S i har fået instruks om.
Og hvorfor vi selv 28-10-2019. har måtte fremlægge vores svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S