It may be that you think we are crazy.

But this is the truth about Jyske Bank’s business methods.

Methods such as Jyske Bank A/S will hardly only expose us.

And therefore it is a major Danish social problem.

🙂

 

Hope for your understanding and that you can read it as we explain.

After all, it is the small customer, in the large Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S

Who not only had to fight against serious illnesses, and then against Jyske Bank A/S who is grossly deceiving their customer.

But that we as a customer, have also really had to fight against our 2 most recently lawyers Rödstenen and Lundgrens, who must be extremely corrupt, since they have merged the pillars with Jyske Bank against us.

🙂

 

 

Jyske Bank’s debt collection department demanded that our house be sold.

Just as when Jyske Bank at Anette Kirkeby department head Jyske Bank Helsingoer, and Casper Dam Olsen Jyske Bank Hilleroed, sales of the building site demanded Bybjergvej 45.

Which Jyske Bank afterwards denies any knowledge of.

 

Now we did not think that Lundgrens would harm our case against Jyske Bank by simply not presenting it.

 

 

 

 

Birgit Buch Thuesen Jyske Bank Silkeborg

Then refused to open a deposit account, or receive the sale proceeds.

The buyer could therefore not pay for the building site for over 3 years.

While Jyske Bank tries to harm their customer financially as much as possible.

🙁

 

 

As today 2020, when the groups continue the bank’s fraud, by continuing to raise interest rates 5,32 %, also that part of the loan, that has been forcibly repaid, whether the customer has a swap or not.

 

But the management of Jyske Bank’s group is completely indifferent.

The Board of Directors has been there at least since 19-05-2016. been 100% aware that Jyske Bank, by forcibly reducing an alleged underlying loan, to Jyske Bank’s swap, which is allegedly restructured, Annex D.

Without letting the Bank Swap. from 16-07-2008 Annex 1. follow down.

 

Here you see the fake swap of 4,328,000 dkk, a result of Annex 1.

Which Jyske Bank itself made on 16-07-2008. without agreement with the customer.

But as Jyske Bank for every price wants the customer to be deceived.

That is, 1 year before the customer chooses 03-07-2009 to pick up, a late and other offer for a new project of 4,300,000 dkk from 06-05-2009

 

Note that Jyske Bank still raises 5.32% in interest, and that of DKK 2,514,583.

While the customer owes Dk 976,439 on the loan the customer was offered 06-05-2009 at Annex AG.

And thus returned home on 03/07/2009 at an interest rate of 2,4987%

See Annex AH.

Was sent to Jyske Bank I.L.Tvedesvej 7. 3000 helsingore. After Jyske Bank then forces the plot Bybjergvej to be sold, and 3 years after goes to the loan repayment Annex AH. If Jyske Bank refuses to duck at Jyske Bank, the customer is forced into a legal battle, where Jyske bank also buys the Customer’s lawyers to work for Jyske Bank.

 

 

 

The Jyske Bank Group is now deliberately, and dishonestly exposing their customer to deliberate and gross fraud.

🙂

We update the banking news page and make it more manageable.

Moves most subpages to the blog.

 

Instead, there are some pages where we describe Jyske Bank’s many violations of the Criminal Code, that is to say, economical crimes.

Regardless of whether Jyske Bank’s board members, have several political friends, who can have political influence, that neither the Danish police, the State Attorney, nor the Ministry of Justice have wanted to help the victim, who is exposed to gross exploitation and financial crime in Jyske Bank A/S, well and the brand is supported by Jyske Bank’s group management in association.

 

Although we did not think this is funny

 

We have only been able to fight against Jyske Bank, by writing about the group’s crimes against us as a customer.

Since the Jyske Bank Group management, with a very high probability, has paid our former lawyer

Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, by Partner Dan Terkildsen and his co-head, at least Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen, Pernille Hellesøe, Mette Marie Nielsen, Emil Hald Winstrøm. – Not very likely to present the client’s claims in court.

 

Page about Jyske Bank’s claims and their denials, where at Jyske Bank A/S has written off our loan offered 06-05-2009 Appendix AG.

reduced with the sale, without letting the interest rate swap Appendix 1. follow down.

 

Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not.

The Jyske bank group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank knows this, and that the Board of Directors supports the bank’s fraud.

 

As Mette Marie Nielsen from Lundgrens said, when she called on 18 December 2018 approx. 5 pm and told

These are some very serious accusations we make against Jyske Bank.

To which Mette Marie Nielsen is informed, that she must look in the folder with the evidence, that she has personally been given.

 

The fact that the Danish lawyer’s houses, such as the law firm Rödstenen in aarhus, choose to cover up a bank’s crimes by directly opposing their client’s extension of allegations against Jyske Bank A/S never presented to the court, is critical when the same lawyer’s house Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, tries wanted to close the case against Jyske bank A/S, and claims it was agreed by telephone.

 

In one case we write to Thomas Schioldan Sørensen Rödstenen attorneys and ask if there is anything new in the case.

Thomas answer so we have agreed to close the case, which he sent a letter about.

 

A little funny

That this alleged letter has never come, only because we move we get stuck in the agreement Rödstenen and Jyske Bank A/S with great sense made to close the case.

When Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is claiming that there was a telephone agreement, between the plaintiff and 2 attorneys from Rödstenen in Århus, as a client, we would stand badly.

There are, after all, the words of Rödsten’s 2 lawyer against, the small plaintiff, who is up against Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank.

 

Fortunately we had already become suspicious that Rödsten’s lawyers could be corrupt, but could not prove it.

Therefore we have also contacted, our lawyer from the Appeals Board in Case 328/2013. Søren Narv, who has been extremely helpful.

 

And has in 2017 seen some of the papers we have found, and which did not seem to agree with what Jyske Bank A/S “Lund Elmer Sandager” has presented, Søren looks puzzled at the appendices and says.

If the documents are genuine:

Then it looks completely criminal.

 

That is why we decide, that it is probably best to record the conversation between the plaintiff and Rödstenens 2 attorneys.

Which should prove to be a good decision.

 

Since we have subsequently been able to prove that Rödstenens attorneys, at Thomas Schioldan Sørensen have lied in order to bring the case against Jyske Bank.

 

If Thomas Schioldan Sørensen still does not believe to have lied to the client.

Then we should like to lay the record on her.

 

 

 

And in order to help Jyske bank A/S, to disappoint in legal matters, partly by not presenting the client’s many fraud allegations against Jyske bank, with the worst would, Thomas have tried to close the case, behind the back of the client.

And in direct contravention of the customer’s instructions.

 

After the law firm Rödstenen, by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, is revealed to have acted dishonestly and dishonestly against the client, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen himself chooses to withdraw from the case.

 

But Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is not done

Thomas writes repeatedly and recommends that we give up as we have a very bad case.

 

 

Which is not the case with Lundgren’s Partner Dan Terkildsen 28-08-2019. pm. 15.42 in mail writing.

Depreciation:

I think we have a good case if we stick to the very simple, as I have written earlier written that the swap agreement concerns a loan that has never been paid off.

 

Dan Terkildsen also writes in mail 28-08-2019

That Lundgrens will not use strong words about “should probably stand as” fraud and false.

Partly because we don’t have to.

And partly because it does not benefit our cause.

And not necessary.

 

In other words, Lundgren’s attorneys who were transferred to the case on February 5, 2018, and repeatedly instructed to present the case as fraud and false, now write August 28, 2019, that they will not submit it.

 

 

If not, because Lundgrens works for Jyske Bank A/S and will harm our case, simply by not presenting the client’s claims at all.

 

Then, before Lundgrens entered into their million kroner’s cooperation with Jyske Bank A/S, Lundgrens should have withdrawn.

That is unless this cooperation, was entered into between Lundgrens and Jyske Bank in order to disappoint in legal matters.

So when so many lawyers at Lundgrens, have actively helped not to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S

 

Then it smells of corruption and bribery done between Lundgren’s lawyer partner company and Jyske Bank’s group management.

 

Who with their over 100 employees, have actively chosen to help Jyske Bank A/S disappoint in legal matters, by not providing what the client has given instructions to provide.

 

This here feels like an assault and is outright evil, and dishonest business practices.

We already accuse Jyske Bank of being fraudulent.

 

Just read the sea there since Nov 2016 has been written on the car here.

 

But now also Lundgren’s lawyers for being corrupt.

 

 

Since Lundgrens cannot find out to present our claims.

Like present our claim against Jyske Bank’s regarding the sale of the land, and thus an extra ordinary installment on the loan, from 03-07-2009 in Nykredit, which Jyske bank forgives to interest swap, without simultaneously reducing the swap, at the same time as the actual loan.

 

 

 

Jyske Bank, as always, denies whether it is help with money laundering, their poor advice or otherwise, Jyske Bank always has a different opinion.

 

But that Jyske Bank refuses to have anything to do with the case of the building site Bybjergvej 45, and refuses to close the transaction, as it took 3 half a year, before Nykredit finally replied, that they would now like to close the deal, even though Nykredit was not obliged to do so.

 

 

 

 

 

Thus, we also had to pay interest on that loan in Nykredit and 3% in Contribution during the period when Jyske Bank tried to undermine our business financially, while also exposing us to fraud.

 

All of this here seems to Lundgrens not important, and it will hurt our case against Jyske Bank to present.

 

This is at least what Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen writes in his email 28-08-2019, and deliberately does not write our 9 witnesses, only the 2 witnesses that Jyske Bank itself wants to approve Lundgrens will be called.

 

Since Lundgrens does not submit one, of our allegations against Jyske bank A/S for gross exploitation and fraud

As Dan Terkildsen says it will harm our case

 

 

And that Lundgrens will not even send us a copy of the Prosecution dated 02-09-2019 supports our suspicion, of that Lundgren’s lawyer’s business is corrupt.

 

WHY

The case is about FRAUD, Exploitation, withholding of evidence, document manipulation, and lying in legal matters, that’s some of Jyske Bank’s preferred tools in the bank’s struggle to disappoint in legal matters.

But we do not want to find ourselves in Jyske Bank A/S is deceiving, one is that the Danish police refuse to interrogate and investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, and say that you have to bring your claims even in the district court.

 

 

Jyske Bank has submitted supporting documents such as these to win the right to raise interest rates of DKK 4,328,000. At the same time, Lundgrens will not submit that the Bank has forced the customer to sell land, and reduce the bank loan in Nykredit Annex AH.

 

without Lading the interest rate swap down, Dan terkildsen says it will hurt my case to submit the seed something, and we will must agree with what Jyske Bank and Lundgrens must have agreed

 

Jyske Bank has repaid our loan 4,300,000 dkk offered 06-05-2009 Annex AG.

reduced by sale of building land, without leaving interest rate swap Appendix 1. down.

 

 

 Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not

The Jyske Bank Group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank employees know it. and roughly Jyske Bank’s board of directors in association supports the bank’s convoluted fraud.

 

Jyske Bank’s management, believes that they have the right to take interest from Appendix 1.

And that it should be paid to Jyske Bank, That the customer has not discovered.

 

At the customer has not discovered, Jyske Bank has repeatedly maligned with appendices.

That Jyske Bank has succeeded in lying to the customer since 2008 / 2009 that the Customer has taken out the loan of 4,328,000 in Nykredit.

That it has succeeded in lying to the customer that the loan of the DKK 4,300,000 in Nykredit, has been repaid.

That Jyske Bank has succeeded in covering the swap, customer approved 15-07-2008 which was closed on 30-12-2008.

 

 

 

That the customer has not discovered that Jyske Bank has made one year’s settlement from 2008 Appendix O. where Jyske bank has removed an agreement attachment that starts on 15-07-2008 and closes on 30-12-2008

 

 

That the client was ill about 5 years after a brain haemorrhage, and therefore has not discovered the massive lies.

And that Jyske Bank has made a false document.

According to Jyske Bank,

 

The Jyske Bank must be harmed. And for safety’s sake, made an agreement with Lundgrens, not to submit any of the customer’s claims.

Well, they are proficient in the Danish banks.

 

Here are Appendices that should have been removed 20-11-2008.

But as Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors now uses towards their customer.

Appendices that should only be used if we wanted to repay the offered loan of DKK 4,328,000.

Nicolai Hansen got these attachments signed on 10-07-2008

Because they were ready, and assured the customer, that they would not be used if we did not take the loan offer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors will now use all shootings against their customers.

And try to get these cashiers’ attachments to be a disbursed loan in Nykredit, even though Nykredit has informed Jyske bank 06-05-2009 that they have lapsed.

 

Although Nykredit writes to Jyske Bank 06-05-2009 that the earlier offer and mortgage deed have lapsed.

Jyske Bank is in bad faith, and 20-05-2009 Resevere upward repayment to Nykredit of DKK 4,328,000, in connection with claims about more mortgage.

 

 

–

Before you consider using or working for Lundgren’s attorneys, you should read the page here to know if Lundgrens is a corrupt law firm it is bribed to harm some of their clients’ cases.