There will also be audio clips shared with the client’s former attorneys, so you can hear both.

Law firm Rödstenen. Dalgas Ave 42, 8000 Aarhus +4586121999

And

Lundgrens Advokat partner company. Tuborg Boulevard 12. DK-2900 Hellerup +4535252535

In the shared recorded conversations, you will hear both Lundgrens and Rödstenen employees, even very clearly, and may be clearly informed by telephone.

Partly the client’s many repetitive allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, but not least emphasizes the seriousness of the case, where the client repeatedly, says that it is a fraud and false case.

The Jyske Bank Group has on several occasions been offered to admit fraud against the bank’s customers, which the management refuses, while the large Danish bank Jyske Bank by the Group management, continues the serious fraud and exploitation, the case fraud allegations are presented to the court.

Which most recently Lundgren’s staff, attorney Emil Hald Winstrøm in all telephone conversations has been disclosed.

Emil Hald Winstrøm confirms by telephone, that he has understood. that this is a fraud case.

Nevertheless, on behalf of partner Dan Terkildsen and Lundgren’s attorneys on September 2, 2019, Emil Hald Winstrøm presents the case to the court, without including any of the client’s claims.

And without sharing Lundgren’s claim document with the client.

Although Lundgren’s lawyer, and partner Dan Terkildsen is subsequently sued for a copy of their own claim document from 2 September 2019.

(since it has nothing to do with the client’s claims.)

Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.

Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen choose again not to share court documents, with their client.

We will continually, share a lot where we can clearly prove, that several Lundgren’s attorneys must have planned, not to submit their client’s claims.

05-02-2018 på vej til Lundgrens

The client has really been without a lawyer since February 5, 2018 when Lundgrens was hired, and up to Lundgrens 25. September 2019 was fired.

This case clearly shows how some of Denmark’s biggest lawyers, by their actions, are a serious threat to legal certainty.

The case here is a terrible example of how Danish lawyers, like here the plaintiffs’ lawyers Lundgrens have really, counteracted their client.

At the same time that Plaintiff’s Attorneys really worked for Defendants in the case, removing Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants.

As here in the case where plaintiff’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S were not presented to the court.

Plaintiff’s attorney here Lundgrens, in this way, has shown that the law firm, in fact, has work to disappoint in legal matters, by going directly against the client’s instructions.

*

We will document this by sharing letters, mails and sms to Lundgren’s many lawyers who were hired to present the Client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.

Inother words, we want to document that from the outset, Lundgren’s lawyers must have entered into a collaboration with the counterparty Jyske Bank A/S.

Which obviously must be the reason, why Lundgren’s lawyers planned to attend the main hearing on September 30, 2019, without having presented any of the client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.

Which indicates that Jyske Bank Group management has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to counter the client, with the sole purpose of helping Jyske Bank’s board of directors and Lund Elmer Sandager, who has repeatedly lied in legal matters, to simply disappoint in legal matters.

*

Lundgrens Advokater chooses not only to work against their client, but also chose to pursue another case against Jyske Bank A/S.

Lundgren’s attorneys at Dan Terkildsen will receive this first folder of evidence on 5 February 2018 for Jyske Bank to carry out Mandate Fraud, Fraud, Document Fake, Proxy Abuse, Exploitation OSV.

Than the case against Jyske Bank for fraud as the client February 5, 2018, transferred to Lundgren’s lawyers.

Lundgren’s Attorneys have harmed the confidence of the Danish lawyers, by unethical, dishonesty and possibly by violations of the law, made every effort to prevent their client’s claims from being brought to court.

Poor lawyer advice in LUNDGRENS.
Lundgren’s attorneys at Dan Terkildsen receive a folder of evidence on 5 February 2018 for Jutland Bank to carry out Mandate Fraud, Fraud, Document Fake, Proxy Abuse, Exploitation OSV.
Lundgrens is requested to proceed with the case and to present the Client’s claims to the court.

Can clients in the large law firms soon rely on the lawyers they employ if Jyske Bank A/S may pay Lundgrens, or otherwise have caused Lundgrens to do the exact opposite of what their client has 100 times said and written to be presented.

What do we have to do with great Danish lawyers like Lundgren’s Lawyers.

The case here is about the big Danish lawyer’s houses really to be trusted.

We can prove that several of those employed in Lundgrens, have proven to work against the client, rather than working for the client.

One thing here is that the client wants Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank A/S, to stop the bank’s fraud against the customer.

This they asked Lundgrens to help them with, instead Lundgrens is employed by Jyske Bank, and what happened then ?.

The client believes that the Jyske Bank groups have paid Lundgrens for not submitting their client claims to the court.

This is a serious problem for all Danes

And if the same lawyers as here Lundgrens, has clients in the US., ENGLAND, RUSSIA, CHINA, JAPAN, GERMANY Can these clients also get into the same problems as us?

When Danish clients obviously can’t trust big Danish lawyer houses like Lundgrens.

Then Lundgrens becomes a major threat to legal certainty.

If you cannot trust the lawyer you hire will be loyal to you, as their client, this is a grave problem.

Lundgrens chose not to answer their client, or to share court documents with the client, which does not look good.