Now, we just want Jyske Bank Group management to admit that the bank is exposing us to fraud.

Read at danish.

 

It shouldn’t be that hard to understand.

 

Here at the top is the Chairman of Jyske Bank A/S

CEO Anders Christian Dam, and below we have the next chairman of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors Kurt Bligaard Pedersen.

2 very powerful people, in the Danish industry.

 

 

None of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors have wanted any form of dialogue, or have Jyske Bank stop deceiving us.

Just think about why Dan Terkildsen 13-08-2019.

At the meeting in Lundgrens, told that the Board of Directors of Jyske Bank had no responsibility.

Dan Terkildsen Lundgrens has a meeting with Philip Baruch on November 2, 2018. for Lund Elmer Sandager.

Philip who advises on the board’s responsibilities, may have given Dan Terkildsen a course in precisely the board’s responsibilities, and that Dan Terkildsen therefore knows so much about the board’s responsibilities.

Dan Terkildsen you say that everything we say, is just conspiracy theories.

And Jyske Bank board member Philip Baruch says that Jyske Bank A/S is rejecting our allegations of bribery.

 

But the way Lundgren’s attorneys have behaved, clearly shows that Lundgrens runs a law firm, whose intention has been to help Jyske Bank’s lawyers from Lund Elmer’s “Jyske Bank” fraud cases disappoint in legal matters.

Which appeared to be a good explanation.

But we also make it clear that we are just writing, that is how it looks.

Unfortunately, the Danish police or the city attorney would not help us.

The Danish authorities say, that we ourselves have to present our claims in civil court, and that the state attorney does not believe that Jyske Bank A/S will be convicted.

But just getting our claims in civil court turned out to be really difficult.

And maybe in sadness if Jyske Bank A/S has also paid our earlier lawyer, Lundgren’s attorneys, just not to present any of our claims in court.

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

Here is what we very clearly ask Lundgren’s lawyers to submit 18-12-2018.

 

11-12-2018 review of case as we wish it to be presented procedurally before 18-12-2018.

If Jyske Bank does not itself want to give concessions and settle the case.

 

Read the 40 pages where we explain our charges against Jyske Bank, which we want Lundgrens to present to them. And just below the link you can see havd Lundgrens presented on December 18. 2018.

And this was the reason why we ourselves presented Dec. 28-101, which Lundgrens would not relate to, nor did the client inform anything that the court would ignore these annexes.

It was clearly for Lundgren’s lawyers to pursue their own case against Jyske Bank, as a spectacle without content.

 

 

 

 

 

We are not lawyers and therefore we have hired Lundgrens, we just do not know that Jyske Bank bought Lundgren’s lawyers after we brought them our case on February 5, 2018 .

 

 

---

 

 

One is to be up against a sage’s dishonest and an obvious criminal banking business, a bank that is lying, and using document false and fraud, it is one thing.

That you also have to deal with corrupt lawyers, who have deliberately and dishonestly counteracted, their clients allegations were made to damage their case against Jyske Bank A/S.

There are fucking disgusting ones.

 

 

Hereby we must strongly warn you against using Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, these these are very likely to be corrupt.

 

 

 

 

---

---

Can no people see that there is something wrong in one of Denmark’s largest law firms Lundgrens.

Since the client for 43 months has asked their now 2 earlier lawyers.

First a lawyer Rödstenen, and then Lundgren’s lawyer make sure not to present their client claims.

 

Why does it end up that even lawyers like Lundgrens have deliberately and dishonestly counteracted that some of the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.

So we ourselves have had to present our claim as best we could on 28-10-2019.

 

 

Jyske Bank A/S was to issue their new closing certificate on December 11, 2019. But did not answer.

Our new lawyer called on December 20, saying that Jyske Bank could not understand what we think, and that our new lawyer must present our claims in a way that Jyske Bank A/S can understand, this might make sense, because Jyske Bank seems weak witted.

 

All the while, Jyske Bank Board of Directors continue to continues deceive us.

Why can’t the board acknowledge that here, an admission and apology for 12 fraud is in place.

 

Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
Anker Laden-Andersen 2019
Per Schnack 2019
Sven Buhrkall 2019
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen 2019
Rina Asmussen 2019
Philip Baruch 2019
Jens A Borup 2019
Keld Norup 2019
Christina Lykke Munk 2019
Haggai Kunisch 2018 ud
Johnny Christensen 2019
Marianne Lillevang 2019
Anders Dam 2019
Leif F Larsen 2018 ud
Niels Erik Jakobsen 2019
Per Skovhus 2019
Peter Schleidt 2019

Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem tidligere Koncern chef i Nykredit

 

 

Dear Jyske Bank Group Management, you will not be happy to stop exposing us to your fraud.

 

---

 

 

The fact that Jyske Bank has paid our former lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers to withhold our claims against Jyske Bank A/S to disappoint in legal matters is disgusting banking business.

But what else should be the reason?

 

---

 

To emphasize the seriousness of our case against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud, in which Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, has worked to damage their client’s case and legal certainty.

Lundgren’s lawyers have not only withheld their clients’ claims and evidence before the Danish courts.

 

But Lundgren’s attorneys have also withheld several court documents to the client.

This has been very damaging to the client’s evidence in court, and has damaged the client’s legal certainty.

 

That Lundgren’s attorneys also, did not want to share litigation 2. of September 2, 2019. with their client.

Can only be done so that the client does not have to discover that Lundgren’s lawyers have actually worked for Jyske bank A/S.

 

And that Lundgren’s lawyers at least since the law firm, began their cooperation with Jyske Bank A/S around, March April 2018, Actually, they have worked to damage their client’s case against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.

And that’s why at least these 5 lawyers at Lundgrens.

Dan Terkildsen. Pernille Hellesøe. Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen.

As well as Lundgren’s students like Mette-Marie Nielsen. Emil Hald Winstrøm, who will learn from Partner Dan Terkildsen, how Lundgren’s lawyers work to ensure the legal security of their clients.

 

 

It has been documented that at least these 5 employees. in Lundgrens have worked together in this fairly simple case against Jyske Bank A/S.

But we have an idea that Lundgren’s management and board must stand behind, together with Lundgren’s partners.

And that at partner meetings, it must have agreed that Lundgrens should not present their client’s fraud claims against Jyske Bank A/S.

Just as it must have been Partner Dan Terkildsen’s job, to make sure that Lundgren’s lawyers did not share court documents with their client.

 

And that Lundgren’s lawyers have therefore not sent a copy of.

 

Petition B. March 20. 2019.

and Petition C. August 27, 2019.

As well as Prosecution 2. September 2, 2019.

These documents B. C and 2, the client first gets after Lundgrens is fired.

 

The client says that Lundgren’s attorneys deliberately, and in bad faith, chose not to share any other documents with the client, even though the client for a period of 4 months, where the client repeatedly shunned copies of all court documents.

Only when the client has twice asked the court, for copy of court documents in the client’s case, and the court after the second letter, has written to Lundgrens.

 

Only now, on August 23, 2019, Lundgren chooses to send a copy of 5 letters, and writes letters contain nothing of importance.

 

We suspect the 5 letters are specially selected.

 

Dan Terkildsen writes that he wants to see through his fingers, that the client himself has contacted the court outside of Lundgren’s lawyers.

 

 

But the annex of the Court with date January 8, 2019.

Led the client on the trail of grove, has tried to keep the client out of the influence of their own case.

 

In sadness when Lundgrens Mette Marie Nielsen on January 9. 2019 writes that the court has written, that Jyske Bank will receive a reply deadline, without writing that the court has written they will disregard Appendix 28-101.

 

Thus is partly the client’s own submitted Appendices and allegations of 28-12-2018. been removed.

Which Lundgrens does not want their client to be informed.

 

At the same time, Lundgrens is bringing a case against Jyske bank A/S, which Lundgrens has not shared with with their client.

 

Lundgren’s lawyers work in that connection without the mandate of their clients.

 

Which Lundgren’s board must have agreed, with Jyske bank A/S about, otherwise it does not make sense.

We share both litigation B. and C. at the bottom.

Then you, as a reader, can ask yourself .

 

Why the client himself had to get a copy of the Law Book 3, October 2019, after Lundgren’s lawyer partner company was fired on 25 September.

 

“The letter was written late September 24, as Lundgrens has not responded to the letter of September 19, where we ask Lundgrens to provide information about Lundgren’s work for Jyske Bank. Or whether Lundgrens has not worked for Jyske Bank A/S”

 

---

 

 

 

If Lundgrens does not believe they have countered the client’s allegations in being presented to the court.

Or if Lundgrens has not worked for Jyske Bank A/S.

Then we receive your “Lundgrens” explanation on phone +4522227713.

Since the Danish police will not investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, we also do not think the police will investigate whether Jyske Bank A/S has paid Lundgrens bribery, hidden as a return commission, for not submitting our allegations against Jyske Bank for Bedrageri. “FRAUD”

 

*

Remember that Lundgren’s lawyers must be corrupt

Since what we write and ask Lundgren to present here September 1, 2019.

And like Lundgrens, the day after September 2, 2019, is Lundgrens presented a chase as is 100% against the client’s instructions

 

01-09-2019

Remember that this is just one of maybe 100 letters and emails to Lundgren’s lawyers.

Letters repeatedly asking Lundgren’s attorneys to present our case against Jysk Bank A/S Silkeborg Denmark as gross exploitation and fraud.

 

We will share letters in the Blog here.

 

See especially in document 2.

2. sep. 2019 on page 2. This is Lundgren’s allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.

Keep this document up against their client’s claims, against Jyske Bank A/S. And then look at page 3.

And then look at page 3. of what Lundgrens has presented on September 2.

Here are the same witnesses, that Jyske Bank in Prosecution B. March 20, 2019. has presented as those Jyske bank wants to summon.

And as quite amusing are the same witnesses as those Lundgren’s attorneys on September 2, 2019. want to summon.

 

Just remember that at no time, did Lundgren’s lawyers want their client to have a copy of these litigation.

Which is why the client is ignorant of Lundgrens lawyers must have been paid by Jyske bank A/S, not to present their client’s claims.

 

Otherwise, it doesn’t make any sense either.

 

02-09-2019  Page 1/5

02-09-2019  Page 2/5

02-09-2019  Page 3/5

02-09-2019  Page 4/5

02-09-2019  Page 5/5

 

 

See the letter and mail of September 1 and what Lundgrens presents to the court on September 2. and without wanting to share a copy with their client.

It must be Denmark’s biggest bribery case, where Denmark’s next largest bank Jyske Bank A/S has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers to counter their client in order to disappoint in legal matters.

 

Or do the Danish Bank Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgrens have another explanation, then we would like it so that we can share it.

 

We do not want to accuse Lundgren’s lawyers of being a corrupt law firm.

We either want or accuse Jyske Bank A/S of being a criminal.

And we will not at all accuse Jyske Bank A/S of using bribes to prevent Lundgrens from presenting our allegations against Jyske Bank for false and fraud.

 

 

Now remember that conversation promotes the understanding CEO Anders Christian Dam

If Jyske Bank has not bribed Lundgren’s “hidden as Return Commission” for Lundgrens, not to present their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske bank.

Then this entry in the journal banking news should of course be corrected.

 

This is just one example of the many times Lundgrens since February 5, 2018 And until Lundgrens was fired on September 25, 2019.

Where Lundgrens has, at its most serious, opposed the law, and that which the Danish lawyer community must protect

Exactly the trust in the Danish lawyers.

 

When Lundgrens has cheated on their client, and instead worked for the defendant Jyske Bank A/S, in Denmark’s most serious case of exploitation and fraud carried out by a large Danish bank A/S, it weakens confidence in the large Danish lawyer’s houses.

 

 

 

---

 

Here are the court documents that Lundgren withheld to their client.

Our new lawyer has got 4 folders with our claims and what we have submitted on 28-10-2019, so we have a lawyer to help us.

 

---

Here is Petition B.

March 20. 2019.

This we get October 3, 2019.

 

 

 

 

Here is Petition C.

March 27. 2019.

This we get august 3, 2019.

 

 

But we also make it clear that we are just writing, that is how it looks.

Unfortunately the Danish police or the city attorney would not help us.

The Danish authorities say that we ourselves have to present our claims in civil court, and that the state attorney does not believe that Jyske Bank A/S will be convicted.

But just getting our claims in civil court turned out to be really difficult.

 

And maybe in sadness if Jyske Bank A/S has also paid our earlier lawyer, Lundgren’s attorneys, just not to present any of our claims in court.

Can some people see that there is something seriously wrong in Denmark’s largest law firms.

Since the client for 43 months has asked their now 2 earlier lawyers. First a lawyer made Rödstenen, and then Lundgren’s lawyer patronized the company to present their claims.

Why does it end up that even lawyers like Lundgrens have deliberately and dishonestly counteracted some of the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud.

So we ourselves have had to present as best we could on 28-10-2019.

 

Jyske Bank was to issue their new closing certificate on December 11, 2019.

 

But did not answer the court.

Our new lawyer called on December 20, saying that Jyske Bank could not understand what we wrote

This might make sense, because Jyske Bank seems weak.

All the while, Jyske Bank continues to support the overall Board of Directors to continue to deceive us. Why can’t the board acknowledge that here, an admission and apology for 12 fraud is in place.