Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt.
Former client of Lundgren’s lawyer’s partner company.
Asking big questions about Lundgren’s honesty
MED LOV SKAL MAN LAND BYGGE
Lundgren’s lawyers must be paid by Jyske Bank’s group management, paid or received a return commission.
In order to restrain the client’s fraud claims against Jyske Bank A/S before the court.
Whichis directly against legal certainty.
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen, Pernille Hellesøe, Dan Terkildsen have been emailed, with our witnesses, and many fraud cases against Jyske Bank’s group and the Bank’s Board of Directors.
Still ask your students, such as Emil Hald Winstrøm and Mette Marie Nielsen, not to submit any of our claims, or leave our evidence before the court.
If Lundgren’s lawyer partners the company’s board of directors, claiming that their students, on their own, acted against the client’s instructions, it will not be a surprise.
To Lundgrens and your partner Dan Terkildsen. don’t try to push the monkey down.
We refer to a judgment of January 9, 2013. Where Dan Terkildsen is mentioned in a complaint case in Danders & Moore, where Dan Terkildsen was a partner.
Now try to admit that it is Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, that has been together and stands behind the restraint of client’s claims against Jyske Bank has never been presented by Lundgren’s lawyers in court.
And then admit that Lundgren’s detention of their own client’s claims to the court has happened by agreement, with Jyske Bank’s group management.
Thus to understand: Plaintiff’s Attorney.
Lundgren’s lawyers, must have been assigned by Jyske Bank’s group.
That the law firm was not allowed to present some of the client’s many and very clear allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and false.
If Jyske Bank’s Group Board and Lundgren’s attorneys, and partners have not been together, to harm the bank’s client and Lundgren’s client jointly to disappoint in legal matters.
Then Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors and Lundgren’s lawyers are welcome to answer the first question.
Why Lundgren’s former client even 28-10-2019 had to submit their allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for gross fraud. against the bank’s customer.
The applicant can be contacted by phone +4522227713
Plaintiff, of course, warrants that their evidence is genuine.
And not as several of Jyske Bank’s evidence has been manipulated.
The plaintiff offers to correct any misunderstandings, but this requires dialogue with Jyske Bank’s management.
As the plaintiff has continuously tried since May 2016 in different and probably fun ways.