Opdate 30-03-2020

03-11-2018.

The notice is in Danish under the letter to court 18-12-2018

 

 

S.1-12. For Lundgren’s claims, annex in the timeline and our comments on our claims against Jyske bank A/S

This should not be misunderstood, except if Lundgrens was bribed for not being able to read Danish.

Letters have been submitted in which we make the Board aware of their management’s responsibilities.

 

 

Can you see what economical powers in Denmark we as small customers are up to.

This is gross exploitation of the confidence we have shown Lundgren’s lawyers when we have put our case against Jyske Bank in their hands.

Lundgren’s lawyers have definitely violated the legal rules relating to the duties of attorneys in the performance of their duties.

We asked Lundgrens to file our fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S

That with Fraud can hardly be doubted.

When Lundgrens chooses to accept a million orders from Jyske Bank, and Lundgrens chose not to file the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank in court.

But instead, completely deliberate and dishonest, chose to lead their client behind the light, in order to lose their case in court. Simply by failing to present some of their client’s claims, thus their client would not, could appeal a relationship their lawyers from Lundgrens have not presented to the court.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here are a few text messages to Lundgren’s student Mette Marie Nielsen

December 15 and 16, 2018, students at Lundgrens cannot read Danish at all.

 

 

 

 

Here is what Lundgrens wrote on 18-12-2018 and presented to the court.

If Lundgrens has not received a bribe from Jyske Bank A/S for not repeatedly presenting what we as a client have, we will not understand anything.

Knowing that this spelling and phrasing may not be at par with Lundgren’s level, but we have been wise to make Lundgrens understand.

One day we were in the office to relay documents, we met Apprentice Mette Marie Nielsen in the elevator, she just looked down at the floor, without saying anything, she must have been bad at deliberately counteracting our case

 

 

The notice is in Danish under the letter to court 18-12-2018

 

 

 

 

Since Lundgrens Mette Marie Nielsen 18-12-2018 agrees to present these 2 appendices, as appendices 18 and 19

It was almost during protest that I asked for more of my annexes to be presented but I did not have to, if more documents were to be submitted, Dan Terkildsen had to approve it, and he sat in a partner meeting.

You can hear her say on the recordings with Mette Marie Nielsen that Lundgren’s lawyers control our case. Even days, before December 18, you can hear the assumptions Mette Marie Nielsen confirms that they will probably get it all and that it is controlled.

But the lawyers in Lundgrens who have their eyes on the case obviously have other plans than to present our case against Jyske Bank for fraud.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DANSK.

03-11-2018. S.1-12. Til Lundgrens påstande, bilag i tidslinien og vores bemærkninger til vores påstande mod Jyske bank.

Det bør ikke kunne misforståes, undtagen hvis Lundgrens blev bestukket for ikke at kunne læse dansk

Der er fremlagt breve hvori vi gør bestyrelsen opmærk på deres ledelses ansvar.

 

 

 

Kan du se hvilken øknomiske magter i danmark vi som små kunder er oppe i mod.

Dette her er groft udnyttelse af den tillid vi har vist Lundgrens advokater når vi har lagt vores sag imod Jyske Bank i deres hænder.

 

Lundgrens advokater har, helt afgjort overtrådt de advokatetiske regler vedrører de pligter, der påhviler advokater i forbindelse med udøvelse af deres hverv.

Vi bad Lundgrens om at fører vores svig sag imod Jyske Bank A/S

 

Det med Svig kan der vist næppe være tvivl om.

Når Lundgrens vælger at tage imod en million ordre fra Jyske Bank, og Lundgrens valgte ikke at fører klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank for retten.

Men i stedet helt bevidst og uhæderligt, valgte at fører deres klient bag lyset, for at ville tabe deres sag i retten.

Ganske enkelt ved ikke at fremlægge nogle af deres klients påstande, således deres klient heller ikke ville, kunne anke et forhold deres advokater fra Lundgrens ikke har fremlagt for retten.

 

 

Her er hvad Lundgrens skrev den 18-12-2018 og fremlage for retten.

Hvis Lundgrens ikke har taget imod bestikkelse fra Jyske Bank A/S for ikke at fremlægge noget af det vi som klient, gentagende har fremlagt, så forstår vi ikke noget.

Ved godt at dette med at stave og formulere sig, måske ikke er på højde med Lundgrens niveau, men vi har kloklet for at få Lundgrens til at forstå.

Den ene dag vi var inde på kontoret for at igen at overbringe dokumenter, mødte vi Lærlingen Mette Marie Nielsen i elevatoren, hun kiggede bare ned i gulvet, uden at sige noget, hun må have haft det dårligt med at bevidst at modarbejde vores sag

 

Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem
Anker Laden-Andersen 2019
Per Schnack 2019
Sven Buhrkall 2019
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen 2019
Rina Asmussen 2019
Philip Baruch 2019
Jens A Borup 2019
Keld Norup 2019
Christina Lykke Munk 2019
Haggai Kunisch 2018 ud
Johnny Christensen 2019
Marianne Lillevang 2019
Anders Dam 2019
Leif F Larsen 2018 ud
Niels Erik Jakobsen 2019
Per Skovhus 2019
Peter Schleidt 2019

Bente Overgaard 2020 bliver nyt medlem af Jyske Bank Bestyrelse, tidligere Koncernchef i Nykredit.

Samme koncern som ikke ville svare på spørgsmålet, om vi har optaget et lån i Nykredit på kr. 4.328.000 få vi stævnede Nykredit.

 

Følg med her Se alle link på bloggen. Til opdelt Bilag.