Jyske Bank nægter at udlever bilag for at skjule bedrag – DENMARK PROBABLY AMONG THE WORLD’S MOST CORRUPT COUNTRIES. / CORRUPTION AMONG DANISH JUDGES AND LAWYERS, IT IS A BIG PROBLEM FOR LEGAL SECURITY. The Danish Bar Association ther is a part in this is to find in Kronprinsessegade 28. 1306. Copenhagen K. and Is involved in CORRUPTION.

The case against the Danish bank Jyske Bank for gross fraud. Has evolved to act on bribery too, as has plaintiff's lawyer Lundgrens. Which is a large Danish lawyer's house, have received return commission, in the form of million assignments by the defendant Jyske Bank. So it looks bad for the confidence of the big Danish lawyer's houses as Lundgrens. / The question is now. Has Lundgren's lawyer partner company, in which the applicant's lawyer Dan Terkildsen is a partner, received a return commission lion from Jyske Bank. Have Lundgren's lawyers been given assignments by the defendant Jyske Bank. Against it as the Lundgren's lawyers, was hired to present to the court. / Lundgrens who is also the plaintiff's lawyer, so does not submit the plaintiff's fraud allegations against Jyske Bank. Jyske Bank who has now also hired the same lawyer to advise, Denmark's second largest bank Jyske bank, in a property sale for over half a billion Danish kroner. / That is a fact That after Lundgren's lawyers were employed by Jyske Bank. Have Lundgren's lawyers objected to the plaintiff's claims Jyske Bank for millions fraud, as a direct link between Jyske Bank paying Lundgren's lawyers millions in fees, for advice. / The case against the Danish fraud bank Jyske Bank is only growing. The plaintiff has yesterday, October 28, 2019. Even had to submit their fraud allegations against Jyske bank. / The plaintiff is now considering whether Lundgrens must testify. To confirm that their client has requested Lundgren's lawyers at least 30 times. About presenting the serious allegations against Jyske Bank for million fraud. And allegations against Jyske Bank Group Management With the bank's executive chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam / Then Lundgren's lawyers in court may have the opportunity to explain why Lundgrens has not presented the client's allegations against Jyske bank for fraudulent conduct. And why Lundgrens directly opposed the client's instructions has counteracted the client. / When the applicant's claims are not presented against Jyske bank. This can only be because Lundgren's lawyers have made an agreement with the defendant Jyske Bank, to counteract the case before the court. / / A CASE WHERE THE LITTLE WOULDN'T LIKE TO BE FIGHT AGAINST A CRIMINAL BANK BUT ALSO AGAINST PROVIDING CORRUPT LAWYERS / The client thinks back to Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren's office August 13th. 2019 at Lundgren's office together with 2 of their students. The one student who otherwise "around" March 23, 2019 and there verbally confirms, which 9 witnesses the client will have called. When Lundgren's lawyers saw the purchase of August 18, 2019, confirmed that they had control over which witnesses to call. But very smart, without disclosing their names. Witnesses who are repetitively informed and repeatedly written should be summoned since spring 2018. Then stick to the very clear instructions of the client. Just 4 weeks before the main hearing was due September 30, 2019 Again, the client opposes and September 2 has chosen to exclude the 7 of the witnesses as Lundgrens submits a petition. Incidentally a litigation Lundgrens does not share with the client. Lundgrens also did not share the defendant Jyske Bank's litigation B and C B. which is otherwise from March 20. / No matter what It is a FACT 1. Lundgren's lawyers were brought, fraud case against Jyske bank on February 5, 2018. 2. Shortly after, between March and June 2018, Lungren's law partner company made an agreement and a million tasks to advise Jyske Bank 3. Following the conclusion of the agreement with Jyske Bank, Lundgren's lawyers have not submitted any of the applicant's claims against Jyske Bank for fraud. 4. Lundgren's lawyers have not disclosed to their client, in the case against Jyske Bank, that Lundgren's lawyers have taken on million tasks for Jyske Bank 5. Lundgren's lawyers do not answer the client's question on September 19, 2019, whether Lundgren's lawyers have worked for Jyske Bank. 6. Lundgren's client, the plaintiff discovers September 20, 2019 The fact that Lundgren's lawyers have performed counseling for Jyske bank, around a trade of around 600 million. Danish kroner. 7. Since Lundgren's attorneys still have not answered their question on September 24, the question Has Lundgrens worked for Jyske Bank. And if YES How long have Lundgren's lawyers worked for Jyske Bank 8. September 25, 2019 Lundgrens Client sends a guy's note And justify the decision that Lundgren's lawyers are incompetent. And that Lundgren's lawyers have done massively over billing. Which the client suspects was part of the strategy to run the plaintiff's money box empty, and then could not stop Denmark's second largest bank from continuing the bank's fraud business against the customer. / / Partner of Lundgren's lawyers Dan Terkildsen believes that the client is wrong And writing like that You cannot find a lawyer who does not work for Jyske Bank / Dan Terkildsen writes that there are conspiracy theories. Considering that Lundgrens' collaboration with Jyske Bank affects the way Lundgren's lawyers have worked for the Client against Jyske Bank. While the client thinks that Lundgren's lawyers must surely be called as witnesses. / Has the client / plaintiff themselves had to present their claims against Jyske Bank on 28 October 2019? Partly to lie to the court, through their board member Philip Baruch, who is a Partner of Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys. And, moreover, charges against Jyske Bank's director and management for contributing since May 2016 / The fact that Jyske Bank has not stopped and investigated whether Jyske bank is actually outspoken exposes the customer to gross SWIG. And accusing the management of having a direct contributory cause for Jyske Bank to continue to be charged with continued fraud. - The customer of Jyske Bank has since May 2016 called on Jyske Bank's management at CEO Anders Dam. To meet To date, no one in the Jyske Bank Group or Lund Elme Sandager Has expressed the wish that Jyske Bank would like to be a fair banking company and meet with us The customer says that if We are wrong We are the first to say sorry. / / Dan Terkildsen Lundgrens said for 1 year since That Jyske Bank would complain hahaha. That can not be used for anything. But will Jyske Bank's group management still complain. So Jyske Bank stop i exposein its customers, to continued fraud SO LET IT BE / / dear everyone at Jyske Bank You have been exposed to the case BS 402/2015-VIB Due to approx. 145 documents saw Lundgren's lawyers being threatened with firing if they did not submit them. That Lundgren's attorneys forgot to present the client's claims and did not make an attachment explanation. / We apologize for that, and with the final written petition presented on October 28, 2019, have hopefully explained what annex is for Of course, a new allegation must also be made, which one would think Jyske Bank's Director has paid Lundgren's lawyers for not presenting. But we cannot prove that. Being exposed to fraud by one's own bank is not something fun. Besides, the management is indifferent and probably still sleeps well at night. / CEO Anders Christian Dam if you have not paid Lundgren's attorneys for failing to present our claims to the court. Then we say sorry. However, Jyske Bank's Attorneys and the Executive Board will also apologize If we customers are just right. / Our allegations are now proceeding October 28, 2019 presented by ourselves Since our then lawyers Thomas Schioldan Sørensen of Redstone Attorneys and Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren's law firm Mystically, not having would help us. Or maybe our poor Danish is so poor that they couldn't understand what we were writing. Just kidding :-) But remember The reason we repeat the same thing over and over again. It is only for contact. We have contact difficulties. But also a fun way to tell the board of Jyske Bank / Talk to us, we're actually pretty good here. And then we just try with humor You can find us here Soevej 5. 3100. Hornbaek 22227713 Best regards from a tiny, angry customer.

24-01-2018.
Jyske bank ville have en hurtig domsforhandling, men har flere gange selv fået udsættelse.
–
Jyske bank ved Christian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen og deres 100 Advokater i Lund Elmer Sandager nægter at udlever bilag, og kræver Carsten får et advokatpålæg.
–
Det er her efter vi får Lundgrens, som så efterfølgende bliver ansat af Jyske bank, til ikke at fremlægge nogle af klientens påstande mod Jyske Bank

Kære jyske bank ——— Åbent brev feb 2018
Direktør Ander Christian Dam

Telefon: 89 89 20 01
E-mail: direktion@jyskebank.dk

🙂

Anders du frabeder dig DIRÆKTE kontakt,

Vi skrev ellers til dig 25 maj 2016

Og ønskede dialog og beviser
Først på at lån 4.328.000 kr. Var ægte.

–
🙂

Vi forsøger altså ikke at bedrage jyske bank, ved svig og falsk

Har vi lånt de 4.328.000 kr. som jyske bank påstår,

så betaler vi naturlig vis lånet tilbage plus renter

Når nej renterne har i jo taget fra os, 🙂
men så lånet da

🙂
–

Nu er det lidt mere, vi ønsker at tale om.
det bliver nok til lidt mere,

🙂
🙂

LAD OS MØDES

Den lille familie fra Hornbæk, forstår ikke hvorfor jyske bank fortsætter at bedrage dem.

Nu jyske bank har været bevist om det siden start 2016

–

FAMILIEN SKAAUP RÆKKER IGEN HÅNDEN UD TIL JYSKE BANK

VENLIGST

ALEXANDER CARSTEN ANNE-MARIE SKAARUP

🙂
🙂

Anders du har ikke ønsket at svare og forbyder os dialog

HVORFOR ?

MON IKKE DER ER NOGET, OM DE BEVISER VI FREMLÆGGER, ER ÆGTE ?

🙂

Jyske bank påstår som her 12-06-2017 på et af de mange enslydende svar, der ligger på troustpilot

At jyske bank hverken stjæler, bedrager eller
forfalsker dokumenter, og så forsikker jyske bank os kunder,

At jyske bank skam da er helt ærlige.

🙂

Men er det det sandt ?

Hvor mange gange har jyske bank, udsat andre kunder for det samme, som det jyske bank udsætter os for.

🙂

For os syntes straffeloven omkting dokumentfalsk bedrageri svig ellers ret klar,

men herrer Gud,
Ingen her er så dygtige som jyske Bank

🙂

Hjælp os med at få alle bilag, lad nu være at blive ved med at nægte os dem.

Bare for at det så er nemmere at skuffe i retsforhold

🙂

så vi kan undersøge troværdigheden, ærligheden, og hæderligheden i jyske bank

Vi bede ikke om benægtelse
Vi beder jo bare om dialog og sande svar.

🙂

Derfor Kære jyske bank
Direktør Ander Christian Dam

Vi ønske du vil tale sandt og tale med os, på trods af at jyse bank nægter dialog.

–

Her er et åbent brev,
som vi håber nogle vil vise dig.

Du ved vi skrev til dig 25-05-2016
Og du lod en af dine soldater i jyske bank 31-05-2016 skrive dit svar

🙂

Anders det var et af dine bestyrelses medlemmer, som skrev at jyske bank frabad, at vi skrive til dig Anders Dam

Ej heller din ledelsen eller bestyrelsen i jyske bank ønskede at tale om dette her

–

Kan du ikke ikke god forstå, vi er lidt små surre.

🙂
🙂

Vi siger at din bank jyske bank,

og dine advokater har overtrådt mange paragraffer, og mindst har overtrådt disse love.

–

GOD SKIK FINANS TILSYNET
GOD SKIK ADVOKAT SAMFUNDET

–

TINGLYSNINGS LOVEN
BOGFØRINGS LOVEN
STRAFFE LOVEN
AFTALE LOVEN

–

LOVEN :
sæt af regler som gælder for et bestemt samfundsmæssigt område, og som alle skal rette sig efter

🙂

Hvad ville du jyske bank sige,
hvis det os, familien der snød jyske bank,

fjernede flere dokumenter, lavede falske aftale dokumenter, ændrede bilag, brugte fuldmagter ud over dens begrænsning, hævede penge for noget der ikke fandtes osv

–
Kort sagt SVINDLEDLER jyske bank kunder for millioner,

Spørger bare
Mon ikke jyske bank ville politi anmelde forbrydelsen

🙂

Måske har denne lille sag, ingen betydning for jyske bank, da jyske bank sikkert har mange ligende sager, som banken behandler på samme måde.

🙂

Men for os er det 9 år den jyske bank
Som du står i spidsen for, har frarøvet os.
Syntes ikke det er nogle værdig, at opfører sig på den måde

🙂

kan du ikke godt se og forstå det, ser ud til at være dokument falsk og bedrageri jyske bank laver

hvis vi ikke kan se rigtigt, så hjælp os med at forstå jyske Banks måde at sikker bankens øknomiske interesser.

🙂

Vi tilbyder gerne at betale Jyske bank 300 kr. eller hvad i skal have på time, hvis i vil hjælpe jeres kunder, så vi ikke misforstår.

Vi er jo hverken bank uddannet eller advokater og forstår bare ikke det som i laver, og som i så skjuler for os

🙂

Undskyld hvis ord er lidt grove, men jyske bank svarer jo ikke.

🙁

VI VIL BEVISE VED FLERE BILAG.
AT JYSKE BANK ER ALT ANDET END HÆDERLIG.

🙂

HVORFOR HELVEDE ÆNDRE JYSKE BANK ELLERS I ET ÆGTE BILAG FRA 10-07-2008 FORUD FOR AFSENDELSE 16-04-2009 TIL NYKREDIT

🙁

BILAG (1078) ER FRA 10-07-2008
OG ER LAVET TIL PROJET 1.
OG BLEV KUN LAVET TIL DETTE PROJEKT.

🙂

JYSKE BANK SENDER 16-04-2009
DETTE ÆNDRET, OG NU NYE (BILAG D.) (1093) TIL NYKREDIT, ER MÆRKET D.

FOR LÅNE ET TILBUD 10-05-2008
FRA NYKREDIT PÅ 4.328.000 KR FOR PROJEKT 1.

🙁

ET PROJEKT 1. JYSKE BANK VED ER KASSERT

ET PROJEKT 1. JYSKE BANK VED OGSÅ AT TILBUDET UDLØB 20-11-2008

🙁

JYSKE BANK VED BILAG (1078) VAR UNDERSKRÆVET 10-07-2008 TIL ET HELT ANDET FORMÅL PROJEKT 1.

END DET PROJEKT 2. SOM JYSKE BANK FORSØGER AT BENYTTE DE BILAG TIL, SOM KUN VAR LAVET HVIS PROJEKT 1. BLEV GENNEMFØRT.

🙁

JYSKE BANK RETTER SÅ (1078) FORUD FOR AFSENDELSE TIL NYKREDIT 16-04-2009 (nu BILAG 1093)

🙂
🙁

JYSKE BANK ØNSKEDE SELV AT OPTAGE LÅN TIL PROJEKT 1.
SELV OM PROJEKTET VAR DROPPET HELT.

DETTE GRUNDET AT JYSKE BANK SELV, 16-07-2008 HAR LAVET EN NY RENTE BYTTE PÅ 4.328.000 KR.

–

FOR HVIS NYKREDITS TILBUDTE 20-05-2008 LÅNETILBUD PÅ 4.328.000 KR. FOR PROJEKT 1. BLEV AKTUELT

MEN DET BLEV DET ALTSÅ IKKE,
SÅ DROP NU BEDRAGERIET

🙂

OG INDRØM DA, AT DET IKKE ALTID BETALER SIG AT SNYDE OS SMÅ KUNDER I JYSKE BANK.

OG SIG FORHÆLVEDE UNDSKYLD
SELV OM DET VEL ER 9 ÅR FORSENT.

🙁

NÅR DER I 2009, OG I SADELLESHED I APRIL 2009 fra jyske bank er brugt bilag

som garantier, fuldmagter mm, til andet end det fuldmagten var givet til

som netop kun var til projekt 1.
Og kun vedrørte tilbud fra Nykredit på 4.328.000 kr. til projekt 1.

🙁
–

Projekt 1. 2008
Som var til byggeprojekt på en grund 1.599 m2

Projekt 2. 2009
Som var til byggeprojekt på en grund 2.875 m2

🙁
–

Det er Ikke kun 1 bilag, fuldmagt, garantier der er misbrugt
men flere bilag, som var lavet til projekt 1.

Der har været arbejdet med dette projekt 1. frem til 2008, tilbud herfor udløber 10 maj 2008
projekt 1. kasseres.

🙂

HVOR SVÆRT ER DET LIGE FOR JYSKE BANK AT FORSTÅ.

VI ønsker samtale og dialog.

🙂

Her er en lille familie der er blevet ikke kun er blevet frarøvet og snydt for millioner
grundet FALSK & SVIG og en kynisk grådig bank

En familie som ikke er psykisk svage,
og derfor ikke bare giver op, mod de kæmpe banker som bedrager kunder.

🙂

Vi er sikkert ikke som så mange andre familier,

For her taler vi åbent, om det svig vi er udsat for, og de 9 år jyske bank har stjålet fra familien.

Selv om jyske bank er stærkt uenig heri, kunne jyske bank da godt tale med os.

Dette har vi råbt højt længe, men jyske bank er ligeglade.

🙂

DER ER FLERE STEDER JYSKE BANK HAR LAVE BÆ I BUKSERNE

Som:
Misbrugt begrænset fuldmagt
Fuldmagts misbrug
Dokument falsk

🙂
Løjet om lån det ikke fandtes / findes
Bedrageri
Svig

🙂
Smidt bilag væk
Dokument falsk
Svig

🙂
Lavet ny rentebytte aftale ude om kunde
Dokument falsk
Svig

🙂

Kan blive ved og ved !

🙂
🙂

Kære Anders Dam

Syntes du at jyske bank kan være bekendt
at udsætte deres kunder, for så massivt og
Konstant SVIG & FALSK

Og så nægte at svarer, eller bare svarer bevist forkert.

🙂

Måske kan Carsten ikke stave og formulere sig,

Og har ikke ret til at kræve at #jyskebank svare
Og har ikke ret til at se hvad jyske bank skjuler

Men vi ville nu alligevel fortrække dialog med jyske bank.

Mvh

Familien fra Hornbæk