The client’s money disappeared from Lundgren’s bookkeeping
Now we have found that the account number 2191-4369738912 which we did not show who owned, as Lundgrens Boghoholderi could not find the client’s deposited money, even after they were informed of the dates of transfers.
The account simply belongs to Lundgren’s Bookkeeping.
But if Lundgrens also uses students to book, just as they use students and lawyers who clearly cannot read and understand Danish.
Then it just becomes more mess.
Wrong posting dates. and transferred money that disappears into Lundgrens
When we fired Lundgren, we knew they were good to describe as corrupt, but that client deposit has also disappeared, that is, the client account does not match, it is just a new problem in Lundgren’s partner company.
When we fired lundgrens we knew how good they were to describe as corrupt, but that client deposit has also disappeared.
But that client account is not right, it’s just another problem in Lundgren’s partner company, who should have thought so.
Only yesterday 30-03-2020 we made a small check of Lundgren’s limb way of posting.
And finds that Lundgrens also has no control over their debtor bookkeeping.
Following as the account number 2191-4369738912.
Belongs to Lundgrens and is their client account, then it is strange that they could not find that the book posted DKK 30,000 on real date. and on real client.
And again the DKK 20,000 on the right date. and on real client.
Then 1 month after finding the first 30,000 kroner and then seners, it must be that Lundgrens found them scarce. DKK 16,000 out of the transferred DKK 20,000
How something of a transferred amount can disappear in Lundgrens suggests that it is a law firm rooted in bookkeeping.
We also showed that they have not been able to control, our claims, nor control the reading of documents, that Lundgren’s students also lie to their clients, and they affirm well by the fact that the case is about fraud and fraud.
But nothing presents, nor does it make sure to write the witnesses, who, probably only by telephone.
That Lundgren’s Bookkeeping, not only shrugs for want of payment, not to present the client’s claims, but also shakes off transfers that have disappeared from Lundgrens Bookkeeping.
It was only then that we discovered after we wrote to Lundgrens on March 30, 2020 that they should return the transferred DKK 100,000.
Lundgrens may well be in trouble if they have to repay 100,000 dkk. and may not have registered at all, the 2 registers, at 20,000 and 30,0000 dkk respectively.
We do not know about Lundgren’s bookkeeping.
Either the owner of the account 2191-4369738912 has retained the DKK 50,000 paid on February 20 and 24. 2019
And made sure that the sum of 45,976.67 dkk from the reminder 13-03-2019 has been deleted.
Or else have the account the owner of 2191-4369738912, transfer 45.976.67 to Lundgren’s bookkeeping.
THE ACCOUNT IS CONSIDERED BELONG TO
AND IS A CLIENT ACCOUNT.
Thus, it is Lundgren’s housekeeping that cannot find the book.
And retained the excess DKK 4,023.24.
Are they moved in the coffee box 🙂
Otherwise, it doesn’t make sense that Lundgrens will send us a debt collection, to get these 4,023.24 dkk once more.
We are going to complain about Lundgren’s lawyers to the lawyer mentioned
A new relationship is that money has been lost and transferred to a possible client account 2191-4369738912.
Is it at all possible not to be able to figure out where the money should be posted.
But now we also have to deal with the missing 4,023.24 dkk in our payments, after Lundgrens made years of accounts, they should have appeared if they were in a cookie box.
24-09-2019 and 27-09-2019. page 1-8.
Sharing here Mail to Lundgrens.
13-03-2019. mail with the amount transferred. We also wrote dates, first found the grove one payment and moved for the next.
Then hear no more.
But that should not cost us. 4,023.24 dkk that Lundgrens is a shit company.
30-03-2020 We write to Lundgren’s lawyers that they should be ashamed and look to get the 100,000 repaid. dKK
Sends a copy of the termination of Lundgrens 24-09-2019, and what we ourselves have had to submit to the court, is shown so that Lundgrens can see it matches what Lundgrens should present to us.
Dare you trust the Danish lawyer house.
Lundgrens Partner company.
Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys.
Denmark’s second largest Bank Jyske Bank A/S
If just a bit of this here at Banknyt is true.