The client’s money disappeared from Lundgren’s bookkeeping
Now we have found that the account number 2191-4369738912 which we did not show who owned, as Lundgrens Boghoholderi could not find the client’s deposited money, even after they were informed of the dates of transfers.
The account simply belongs to Lundgren’s Bookkeeping.
But if Lundgrens also uses students to book, just as they use students and lawyers who clearly cannot read and understand Danish.
Then it just becomes more mess.
Wrong posting dates. and transferred money that disappears into Lundgrens
When we fired Lundgren, we knew they were good to describe as corrupt, but that client deposit has also disappeared, that is, the client account does not match, it is just a new problem in Lundgren’s partner company.

23-10-2019. Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen writes that it has hurt our case to present our evidence of fraud, and we had a good case, NOW IT IS BAD, and Dan is unaware of habilitation.

Perhaps Lundgren’s lawyers have not understood what the Client has clearly written.
–
3.1 Lundgrens acts on the basis of and in accordance with the client’s instructions, and the client and Lundgrens regularly agree on the legal assistance and scope of the assignment as well as the client’s and others’ involvement.
First
Lundgren’s attorneys have not written anything that some of their clients’ fraud allegations against Jyske Bank are directly illegal, that is, in accordance with the provisions of the law to present to the court.
🙂
Lundgrens writes they are entitled to refuse to comply with an instruction if this would violate legislation or other rules, e.g. rules of good practice.
2nd
If it is against good practice for Lundgren’s lawyers to stop Jyske Bank’s fraud cases against Lundgren’s former client, then Lundgren’s lawyers have not written anything about it.
Lundgrens it is for fun
laughs
Didn’t you like that Dan Terkildsen 🙂
When we fired lundgrens we knew how good they were to describe as corrupt, but that client deposit has also disappeared.
But that client account is not right, it’s just another problem in Lundgren’s partner company, who should have thought so.

13-03-2019. lundgrens shrugs for payments transferred 30 + 20,000 but does not post them

13-03-2019. Lundgrens is informed that 20 and 30,000 dkk has been paid to cover an invoice of 45,976.67 dk. soon after, the invoice and the remaining 4,023.24 will disappear

20-02-2019. payment 30,000 to Lundgrens,
Lundgren cannot find these and shrugs for payment

24-02-2019. payment 20,000 to Lundgrens,
Lundgren cannot find these and shrugs for payment

11-09-2019. Lundgren’s invoice 48,500 dkk

11-12-2019. Lundgren’s Invoice 47,062.50 dkk

25-03-2020. Lundgrens Rykker 3. 95,562.50 and interest DKK 2,589.25 that is not right.
Some have kept 4,023.24 dkk in Lundgrens a thief or a Greek partner, suspects that Dan Terkildsen has the missing money
Only yesterday 30-03-2020 we made a small check of Lundgren’s limb way of posting.
And finds that Lundgrens also has no control over their debtor bookkeeping.
–

30-03-2020. Lundgren Client account does not vote, either the cash has been taken out or a Partner has money in his own account, and has retained the missing money dkk 4,023.24
Following as the account number 2191-4369738912.
Belongs to Lundgrens and is their client account, then it is strange that they could not find that the book posted DKK 30,000 on real date. and on real client.
And again the DKK 20,000 on the right date. and on real client.
Then 1 month after finding the first 30,000 kroner and then seners, it must be that Lundgrens found them scarce. DKK 16,000 out of the transferred DKK 20,000
How something of a transferred amount can disappear in Lundgrens suggests that it is a law firm rooted in bookkeeping.

30-03-2020. S.1-4.
Letter to Lundgren’s bookkeeping, which is again being objected to the excavation, etc. We would like Lundgren to repay the 100,000 dkk. although they cannot find money in their bookkeeping.

30-03-2020. S.2-4.
Letter to Lundgren’s bookkeeping, which is again being objected to the excavation, etc. We would like Lundgren to repay the 100,000 dkk. although they cannot find money in their bookkeeping.

30-03-2020. S.3-4.
Letter to Lundgren’s bookkeeping, which is again being objected to the excavation, etc. We would like Lundgren to repay the 100,000 dkk. although they cannot find money in their bookkeeping.

30-03-2020. S.4-4.
Letter to Lundgren’s bookkeeping, which is again being objected to the excavation, etc. We would like Lundgren to repay the 100,000 dkk. although they cannot find money in their bookkeeping.
–
We also showed that they have not been able to control, our claims, nor control the reading of documents, that Lundgren’s students also lie to their clients, and they affirm well by the fact that the case is about fraud and fraud.
But nothing presents, nor does it make sure to write the witnesses, who, probably only by telephone.
That Lundgren’s Bookkeeping, not only shrugs for want of payment, not to present the client’s claims, but also shakes off transfers that have disappeared from Lundgrens Bookkeeping.
It was only then that we discovered after we wrote to Lundgrens on March 30, 2020 that they should return the transferred DKK 100,000.
Lundgrens may well be in trouble if they have to repay 100,000 dkk. and may not have registered at all, the 2 registers, at 20,000 and 30,0000 dkk respectively.
.
We do not know about Lundgren’s bookkeeping.
Either the owner of the account 2191-4369738912 has retained the DKK 50,000 paid on February 20 and 24. 2019
.
And made sure that the sum of 45,976.67 dkk from the reminder 13-03-2019 has been deleted.
?
Or else have the account the owner of 2191-4369738912, transfer 45.976.67 to Lundgren’s bookkeeping.
08-04-2019.
THE ACCOUNT IS CONSIDERED BELONG TO
LUNDGRENS LAWYERS
AND IS A CLIENT ACCOUNT.
Thus, it is Lundgren’s housekeeping that cannot find the book.
And retained the excess DKK 4,023.24.
Are they moved in the coffee box 🙂
Otherwise, it doesn’t make sense that Lundgrens will send us a debt collection, to get these 4,023.24 dkk once more.
We are going to complain about Lundgren’s lawyers to the lawyer mentioned
A new relationship is that money has been lost and transferred to a possible client account 2191-4369738912.
Is it at all possible not to be able to figure out where the money should be posted.
But now we also have to deal with the missing 4,023.24 dkk in our payments, after Lundgrens made years of accounts, they should have appeared if they were in a cookie box.
24-09-2019 and 27-09-2019. page 1-8.
Sharing here Mail to Lundgrens.
13-03-2019. mail with the amount transferred. We also wrote dates, first found the grove one payment and moved for the next.
Then hear no more.
But that should not cost us. 4,023.24 dkk that Lundgrens is a shit company.
30-03-2020 We write to Lundgren’s lawyers that they should be ashamed and look to get the 100,000 repaid. dKK
Sends a copy of the termination of Lundgrens 24-09-2019, and what we ourselves have had to submit to the court, is shown so that Lundgrens can see it matches what Lundgrens should present to us.
–

23-10-2019. Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen writes that it has hurt our case to present our evidence of fraud, and we had a good case, NOW IT IS BAD, and Dan is unaware of habilitation.

24-09-2019. S.1-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.

24-09-2019. S.2-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.

24-09-2019. S.3-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.

24-09-2019. S.4-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.

24-09-2019. S.5-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.

24-09-2019. S.6-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.

24-09-2019. S.7-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.

24-09-2019. S.8-8.
mail. Lundgrens fired due to inability. with. rationale attached. Lundgrens is believed to have done a great job, for 200,000 dkk for not presenting the client’s claims.
Dare you trust the Danish lawyer house.
Lundgrens Partner company.
Or
Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys.
Or
Denmark’s second largest Bank Jyske Bank A/S
If just a bit of this here at Banknyt is true.