If it wasn’t for Lundgren’s lawyers
And in the saddle Lawyer Dan Terkildsen.
And Lundgren’s easy approach to lawyer society’s rules of good practice, which the entire management of Lundgren’s lawyers, all in association, must have agreed to be together, ie to help the Jyske Bank group, to disappoint in legal matters, by directly to discourage their client in the worst way.
Then, a long time ago, the case would have been dropped, against Jyske Bank A/S for not only exposing the client to fraud “fraud”, but also that at least since May 2016, the group management / board has been aware of the bank’s continued fraud .
The management has refused to admit the bank’s fraud crimes, or stop continuing to expose customers to the bank’s fraud.
Although Dan Terkildsen at Lundgrens his office in 2018
Told that Jyske Bank would complain about a possible settlement, which we could not use for anything, this is such a serious crime against the bank’s customer that there must be concessions on the table.
The best Jyske Bank has been able to offer to date.
It was through attorney Thomas Schioldan Sørensen to lure us to a settlement meeting back in 2017.
Where the bank’s intention has clearly been to entice us to enter into an interest rate swap for the loan we took on 03-07-2009 of DKK 4,300,000
Where the outstanding debt after Jyske Bank’s forced reduction today is 976,439 dkk.
Against Jyske Bank dropping their swap from 16-07-2008. Annex 1.
Where Jyske Bank today raises 5.32% in interest of DKK 2,514,583.
Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors are all made personally responsible as they are together, and are clearly behind the bank’s continued fraud towards their customer.
To that extent, Lundgren’s lawyers have acted dishonestly in their client’s case.
And in every way tried to help the defendant Jyske Bank A/S.
By not presenting some of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S.
Allegations supported by the massive documentation of Jyske Bank’s continued fraud.
As a customer and investor in Jyske Bank A/S, you should be grateful if the Board of Directors and thus Jyske Bank’s contributors to the Group’s fraud crimes will stop cheating and deceiving the bank’s customers, but there is no morality and honor at all in this Jyske bank’s board of directors.
The Board of Directors, with CEO Anders Dam as the Chairman of the Board, has let Jyske bank expose the customer to now over 11 years, fraud crimes, which Anders Christian Dam has personally been able to stop, at least since 19 May 2016.
But that is what the Group management has denied.
Lundgren’s lawyers have helped Jyske Bank A / S by withholding the client’s claims before the court.
THIS IS ALL THE SAME FACT
Which must have happened to Jyske Bank A/S
Do not be convicted of using “false” and fraudulent documents. “fraud”
You can see our evidence here on the site, and then evaluate whether Lundgren’s work for Jyske Bank A / S in connection with advice in connection with the bank’s sale of 6 properties for 600,000,000 Danish kroner.
When you have established that Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgren’s lawyers must have been transferring millions to Lundgren’s accounts to advise Jyske Bank A/S.
If it is not a return commission.
What will Jyske Bank’s Executive Chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam call it.
What will the board of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company so call it.
With reference to what Dan Terkildsen said at Lundgren’s office on 13-08-2019.
Refer what Dan said:
I don’t know if there are any lawyers (at Lundgrens) who work for Jyske Bank, “and ends with” It’s a big office after all. (and Dan smiles)
A little fun Lundgrens and Jyske bank helped us on our own.
When Philip Baruch presented docents on September 10, 2015.
Agreement documents, that Philip Baruch at the same time provided evidence of didn’t exist.
Similarly, on their own website, Lundgrens has provided evidence of their cooperation with Jyske Bank A/S.
While the largest of the players, the Jyske Bank Group has repeatedly refused to answer anything, not to accidentally provide evidence, that the group knew that the bank was deceiving their customer.
We therefore ask the top of Lundgren’s leadership.
Did your partner Dan Terkildsen know
Did at no time know that Lundgrens by partner Niels Gram-Hanssen give Jyske Bank advice.
Or is Dan Terkildsen simply lying to his clients.
Is it Dan Terkildsen alone, who has the idea of at least these 4 employees in Lundgrens.
Pernille Hellesøe. Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Emil Hald Winstrøm. Mette Marie Nielsen.
As everyone must have been instructed.
not to respond to the client.
Not to share court documents with the client.
Not to present any of the client’s claims in the case against Jyske Bank.
Is Dan Terkildsen right that these are just some conspiracy theories.
And that Lundgrens has not been incompetent
And that Lundgrens could do well lead our case against Jyske bank A/S
“So the case that Lundgrens did not present”
28-10-2019. Final Prosecution Chase BS-402 2015-VIB Claims Appendix 1. is false dato 27-10-2019 has been presented with some spelling and typos as Lundgren counteracted the presentation of the caseer,
We therefore ask the top of Lundgren’s leadership.
Manager. Martin Kirkegaard.
Chairman of the Board. Michael Alstrøm.
Board member. Thomas Kremer.
Board member. Nina Ringen.
Board member. Tobias Vieth.
Board member. Niels Wive Kjærgaard.
Given that Lundgren’s lawyers know at least these 5 employees.
Dan Terkildsen. Pernille Hellesøe. Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Emil Hald Winstrøm. Mette Marie Nielsen.
Everyone has been in touch with our fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S
We therefore ask Lundgrens again.
Is it true and dishonest that Lundgrens has thwarted their own client.
And therefore, have not presented your client’s claims to the court.
At the same time that Lundgren’s lawyers did not want to share court documents with the client.
What we write is FACT.
Lundgrens i is, in our belief, corrupt.
Unfortunately, we believe that the Danish authorities such as the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Finance do not care that Jyske Bank exposes us to fraud.
It can be political, since neither the Police nor the State Attorney will investigate Jyske Bank.
For this reason, the police do not believe that Jyske Bank or any of the board members of Jyske Bank will be convicted.
Like Lund Elmer Sandager attorneys who, by Philip Baruch, have proven to have lied several times in court before the court.
As it is when Jyske Bank board member Philip Baruch has presented to the court false and manipulated evidence to help the Jyske Bank group disappoint in legal matters.
This is how we see the case, and the evidence emphasizes that Jyske Bank A/S has made mandatory fraud, forgery, fraud exploitation and much more.
The evidence also shows that it is the Board of Directors who is responsible for fighting in this unreasonable way in such a large and unequal relationship of strength.
Is your bookkeeping not informed that we have objected to your bills of DKK 185,000. because you hurt our cause.
Since your bookkeeping moves us when we ask you to repay the 100,000 we have transferred, as we have had to hire a new lawyer to do the work we asked Lundgrens.
The manner in which Jyske Bank behaves is poorly in line with the Danish FSA’s ethical values and guidelines for conducting banking activities.
Has this agreement, in fact been an agreement on “a return commission” payment so that Lundgren’s Attorneys are not allowed to submit their client’s claims against the Jyske Bank group.
IT LOOKS LIKE IT.
That’s why we warn you against Lundgren’s lawyers.
As it appears that Jyske Bank A/S has paid Lundgren’s lawyers an unknown million amount hidden as a return commission.
And that Lundgren’s board of directors has accepted this payment, ie Lundgrens has accepted bribery “hidden as a return commission” to damage their client’s case.
By simply not submitting the client’s claims, and withholding court documents to the client, so that the client could not discover what Lundgrens was doing until it was too late.
The email to Lundgrens above from August 30, 2019, is basically the same, as we have said that Lundgrens has to submit since February 5, 2018.
But we did not know that Lundgrens has actually worked for the defendant Jyske Bank, and therefore have other intentions with their comings.
It must be quite clear to see in the mail September 1 how the client’s allegations and 7 witnesses of the client’s 9 witnesses by Lundgren’s attorneys are removed on September 2, 2019.
In the Petition 2 which Lundgrens 02-09-2019 submits to the court, but as Lundgrens does not want to send a copy of to their client.
Lundgrens has thus just fulfilled Jyske Bank’s wishes, regarding the bank’s witnesses from
Processkrift B. et from March 20, 2019.
Where it was also stated that our annex 28-101 from 28-12-2018 is not covered by the case.
But Lundgrens didn’t think they would share a copy with their client, that is, us.
That is why we first get to know this court document from August 3, 2019.
After we 25-09-2019 fired Lundgrens due to suspicion.
That Lundgren’s lawyers have accepted bribes, not to present our allegations.
Thus, Lundgren’s client’s claims against Jyske bank A/S for gross fraud.
But we should know very well that the Court of 8 January 2019. has written to Lundgren’s lawyers and that the Court would just disregard our submitted Appendices 28-101.
The ones that we presented ourselves on December 28, 2018, when unfortunately Lundgrens just forgot to present some of the client’s claims on December 18, 2018.
In sadness when Lundgrens wrote to us on January 9, 2019.
How Lundgrens could forget to tell their client that the court would disregard the client’s claims, they must know the gods and Jyske Bank.
Lundgren’s Attorneys would at all costs ensure that their client was not involved in the case as Lundgren’s work to stay out of court.
Thus, Lundgrens would not want their client to be informed what the defendant and Lundgrens presented to the court.
After all, Lundgrens would not share our case, with their client, ie us.
That’s why we had to after 4 months
Where we have moved Lundgrens for copies of the court book.
WITHOUT GETTING ANYTHING
When we choose to ask the court for access to documents, in the case that Lundgrens is supposed to bring before us, against Jyske Bank A/S.
Then there is something hidden about Lundgren’s lawyers
It must be clear that Lundgren’s attorneys must be in bad faith, since Lundgrens will not tell their client anything about their case, or share Defendant’s 2 most recent allegations. B. and C.
As you can see in the letter to the court. August 21, 2019.
We write that our Appendix 28-101 from 28-12-2018 is presented.
And we inform the court that since April 16, 2019. we have asked Lundgren’s attorneys to send us a copy of the contents of the case.
It is quite unreasonable for Banks to pay their clients ‘attorneys not to submit their clients’ claims against Jyske bank A/S to court
Whether there is a return commission or a bribe is irrelevant in the case here.
We believe that Lundgrens has acted in a way that should be done with those responsible, for the fraud that Jyske Bank Management refuses to stop itself.
And as we have since February 2016. have been trying to get presented.
Regarding the “Havkatten” Catfish comment “picture”
How can a judge look at the evidence if Jyske Bank has paid their client’s lawyer not to present the evidence.
And then we trusted Lundgren’s lawyers
Lundgren’s lawyers who also have other bank clients
Customers like the Danish Bank.
IT WAS A BIG MISTAKE
When Lundgrens 23-08-2019 selected 5 appendices
May it be Annexes such as Lundgrens, must have considered in advance would not harm the agreement that Lundgren’s board must have with the management of Jyske Bank to keep their client’s fraud claims out of court.
Therefore, we will first discover August 27, 2019
that the Court has written on January 8, 2019 that they will disregard our submitted Appendices 28-101.
When Lundgrens hid this information, and instead let us in the belief that everything was in control, Which of course, if we were Jyske Bank.
Remember that Lundgrens has not, at any time, informed or shared
Prosecuting B. from 20-03-2019
Prosecuting C. from 27-08-2018
With their client
THIS IS THE FACT
This is obviously a bribe, but we do not expect the police to take care of this.
After all, it is the Jyske Bank Group, with their powerful political friends behind.
We would prefer that the Danish police help the victim, but financial crime and possible bribery do not belong to the police, so the clients themselves must fight with and find a lawyer who is reputable and who will help stop it as the police are now don’t care.
If Jyske Bank’s management would just offer us to meet and see with us the case documents in through.
If Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has clean flour in the bag, dialogue is now preferable.
EVEN IF EVERYONE IN THE JYSKE BANK GROUP ONLY LINKS FOR US
SO IT’S NOT PARTICULARLY FUNNY.
This is a hand in hand for dialogue.
Uses Jyske Bank A/S’s group management bribe.
Just as Gazprom has also become known for.
And where the future Chairman of the Board of Directors of Jyske Bank A/S
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen has become Group Head of the English Department.
Has Lundgren’s lawyer partner accepted bribery from Jyske Bank A/S
For not presenting their client case to court.
Can the combined Lundgrens lawyer stand misunderstand their client.
Or has Jyske Bank paid for Lundgrens to counteract their client.
Since February 5, 2018. Lundgren’s lawyers hired to bring our case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
We have only fought and fought to get Lundgren’s lawyers to present our claims against the Jyske Bank Group.
But that we should discover on September 20, 2019. that our lawyers Lundgrens have provided Jyske Bank with advice, in a trade for about DKK 600,000,000.
Only supports our suspicion that Jyske Bank’s management, certainly with the CEO as the responsible, must have accused Lundgrens of not submitting some of our fraud allegations against even the same Jyske Bank A/S. If Jyske Bank’s management has not paid, Lundgren’s lawyers, hidden as a return commission, for not submitting the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A / S for gross fraud.
So we cannot understand it, but we are also just some pretty stupid customers, and do not have an understanding of how the economy in the big Danish banks will benefit shareholders such as Nykredit and ATP, who both knew in depth about this case against Jyske Bank.
IT’S SOMETHING WRONG IN THE TOP OF DANISH SOCIETY.
This appendix is like all letters in Danish
Afleveret til Lundgrens at Dant Terkildsen til 03-11-2018 Bilag i tidslinje bedes fremlagt i sagen, kort forklaret
And do therefore the exact opposite to disappoint in legal matters.
Read what Lundgrens gets presented on November 3, 2018.
And see if Lundgrens presents it as the client writes that Lundgrens must submit to court.
Read about Gazprom is known for the use of bribery, so it is natural to use.
Article 1. Gazprom where Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is at the top of the group
Article 2. Gazprom where Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is at the top of the group
Article 3. Gazprom where Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is at the top of the group
Article 4. Gazprom where Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is at the top of the group
Article 5. Gazprom where Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is at the top of the group
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen er med i den danske elite
Links har kun noget med Gazprom at gører
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is only mentioned here to emphasize that he and the rest of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors are extremely powerful.
It is Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors that we try to stop the fraud, Jyske Bank can not itself.