Partner til udvikling af Franchise Koncept
Samhandels partner søges
Århus, Ålborg, Odense, København, Helsingør
Partner
Jyske Bank blev desværre ikke partner
JYSKE BANK ADVARSEL
It is a great thing for legal certainty in Denmark that a Danish bank is allowed by the police to commit crime. Or does the new chief of police or the Minister of Justice have a good explanation, no politicians or authorities will help stop Jyske Bank’s fraud charges against us customers.
LYT TIL DE KUNDER.
DER GERNE VIL TALE MED LEDELSEN OM LIDT BEDRAGERI,
SE ØVERST I DAGBOGEN
Samarbejdspartnere i Jyske bank 2020
Der er intet galt i at arbejde sammen med Jyske Bank A/S, men lad nu være med at dækker over hinanden, som da Nykredit dækkede over Jyske Banks bedrageri imod bankens kunde, tilbage i 2016 hvor Nykredit nægtede at svare på om kunde i Nykredit havde hjemtaget et lån kr. stort 4.328.000 og så senre omlagt dette, først efter Nykredit blev stævnet ville Nykredit svare at der fandtes intet lån på 4.328.000 dkk som Jyske Bank over for retten har hævdet at være et underliggende lån til en swap.
These appendices, including evidence and evidence, show that Jyske bank is doing mandatory fraud, fraud and document forgery, call it what you want, but be aware that JYSKE BANK is cheating on our customers
Appendix 29. 19-02-2010 Jyske bank claims customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit was presented by Lundgrens, without annexe list or explanation, the customer has instead submitted Annex 29.A This he read, and the client in Jyske bank, have even had to submit their final defense, after their own lawyer has been fired, on grounds of suspicion of accepting Return Commission from Jyske bank, against not submitting the client’s claims. Law firm Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen has said that Lundgrens has not accepted bribes After the client 28-10-2019 in court has submitted allegations that Jyske Bank appeared to have bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, which Lund Elmer Sandager denies, claiming that bribery severely distances Jyske bank.
ANNEX Y. Page 1/1. Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000 valid until 20-11-2008 given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED
ANNEX Y. Page 1/6. Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000 valid until 20-11-2008 given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED
ANNEX Y. Page 3/6. Sent to Jyske Bank 20/05/2008 an offer of DKK 4,328,000 valid until 20-11-2008 given for Appendix 31. 39. 40. 41. 126. Project 1. DISCONTINUED
10-09-2015. S.1-52. Response BS-402-2015-VIB. To Jyske Bank’s Appendix K. and Appendix 1. which is alleged to be document false and there is more. much more.
10-09-2015. S.6-52. Response BS-402-2015-VIB. To Jyske Bank’s Appendix K. and Appendix 1. which is alleged to be document false and there is more. much more.
Appendix 7. S.1-3. the original power of attorney 10-07-2008 on a loan offer DKK 4,328,000 expires 20-11-2008 together with the offer.
15-07-2008. S.4-6. Philip Baruch accidentally presents the Swap from 15-07-2008, which the customer discovers in 2016 and starts an investigation of Jyske bank’s business methods.
15-07-2008. S.5-6. Philip Baruch accidentally presents the Swap from 15-07-2008, which the customer discovers in 2016 and starts an investigation of Jyske bank’s business methods.
Appendix 28. A as you can see here, the swap W015776 is closed. 30-12-2008 which we approved 15-07-2008 for the loan of 4,328,000 dkk which we have not taken up.
Appendix O. As you can see, Jyske Bank has removed the approved interest rate swap W015776 on 31-12-2008, on which we signed an agreement on 15-07-2008, if we chose to repay the underlying and offered loan Appendix Y. for the swap, We rejected the loan, and therefore did not repay the loan offered, of Dkk 4,328,000 Appendix Y. and the agreed and approved Swap W015776 on the same and agreed amount. 4,328,000 dkk, closes 30-12-2008. during this period Jyske bank even makes an extra Swap for Offers. Y. is without agreement with the customer. Thus, there are two swaps at the same time on 16-07-2008, but otherwise forgot to create an account for Swappen Appendix 1. Therefore, it is a case of document falsification when Jyske Bank makes such an manipulation.
The fake SWAP 015785 Appendix 1. from 16-07-2008 This relationship from false changed Lundgren’s lawyers to be a contract. But now look at the letters we have shared to Lundgrens and had actually submitted them How much has Jyske Bank Group Management agreed to pay Lundgrens for not submitting their client’s claims? we just ask
På densk heder dette her Mandatsvig. Lundgrens presents this Appendix 53. 09-06-2019, without informing the client about it. – “28-12-2019 the client has submitted it as Appendix 43. after Lundgrens did not present it on 18-12-2018” – Here Jyske bank raises a guarantee against Nykredit 16-04-2009, for a loan of DKK 4,328,000 that does not exist, an offer that has expired and thus lapsed, which Nykredit makes very clear to Jyske Bank in Bilag AG. page 4/6 on 06-05-2009. – That Jyske Bank chooses to lie to the client who is very ill after a Brain Hemorrhage, that he has both taken out the loan and subsequently repaid the loan Appendix D. and Jyske bank chooses by Philip Baruch to continue lying about it to the court , is outright disgusting. If – Jyske Bank and Lund Elmer Sandager are not in bad faith, disbelief. what is it then ?. – The Jyske Bank Board of Directors is not suitable for their position.
Appendix 56. Jyske Bank raises a loan commission of DKK 4,328,000 on April 15, 2009. which do not exist, see Appendix 30. – This appendix was first presented 09-06-2019, as Appendix 56. that the customer until 27-08-2019 believes it is presented as Appendix 45. they can only thank Lundgrens for. – This is because Lundgrens has always kept the client out of their own case, until they are forced to ask the court twice for access to documents before Lundgren’s obedience will share something from the law book of petition. – And Lundgrens must have agreed with Jyske bank what was to be presented, without informing their client.
Appendix 28. 18-10-2016 Mette Egholm Nielsen Nykredit, admits after Nykredit had been sued that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit
Jyske bank bedrager kunde med falsk lån
Jyske Bank har altså sagt til mig at jeg er blevet en dårlig kunde, hvad tror du
ordret sagde de i Jyske banken, det var lige efter et af de møder hvor Casper Dam Olsen
ville have lidt noget mere pant, et pante brev undeskrevet på 500.000 kr. og wupti så var jeg blevet en dårlig kunde,
tror det har noget med at bankens SWAP lån at gøre, men det vil banken da aldrig indrømme.
Banken vil i dag heller ikke fortælle mig, hvordan jeg så bliver en god kunde igen, men det har jeg da regnet ud
JEG SKAL HAVE JYSKE BANKS MODBYDLIGE SWAP LÅN SPOLET TILBAGE, det er et falsk dokument indsat uden aftale, så falsk og lavet ved svigagtighed
Der er det lille grønne øverst tv du skal læse Er det som står der sandt. 🙂 Og hvad vil vi tale med jyske bank om. – Hvorfor frabeder jyske bank Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater sig kontakt – og svare i samme brev usandt på bare 1 spørgsmål ? 31-05-2016
der findes ingen aftaler, det underlægende lån som jyske bank vil rentesikker er falsk, lånet findes ikke, det er ikke lagt om, jyske bank har heller ikke stillet sikkerhed over for Nykredit for noget lån på 4.32
PFA pension aktionær og samarbejdes partner med jysk bank tilbyder pension til dig.
VIL DU VÆRE MED TIL AT JEG FÅR SKUDT EL OG VVS VAGTEN I GANG 100 % SÅ ØNSKER JEG EN PARTNER
ATP pension Pensam sammenarbejder med jyske bank for at hjælpe dig
EN SOM KAN STOLES PÅ, og en som ikke tror på det Jyske Bank fortæller om mig
denne side www.banknyt.dk en gratis reklame gave til Jyske Bank som tak for dårlig rådgivning
Vi gør klar til internet handel på flere hjemmesider, vi har ikke travlt men kom ud af busken og vær med.
Denne side er 16-03-2020 flyttet til Bloggen
Da vi er ved at opdater siden Banking news, der handler om de danske kriminelle banker,
Vi undersøger hvilken danske advokatvirksomheder, der synes villig til at lade sig bestikke.
Og det for at hjælpe kriminelle banker, som her i sagen Jyske Bank A/S. Hvor kunden har opdaget at deres tidligre advokatfirma Lundgrens advokat partnerselskab er blevet købt, af deres bank, Jyske Bank A/S, til at skulle skuffe i retsforhold, ved ikke at fremlægge klientens påstande og beviser imod jyske bank for svig og falsk overfor retten.
En sag der har hvitrækkende konsekvendes for tilliden til den danske bankverden, hvor kunde direkte beskylder Den Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S for bedrageri.
Sagen er fremlagt som svig og falsk, med først 28-10-2019 da både
Advokatfirmaet Rödstenen Dalgas Ave 42, 8000 Aarhus
&
Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab Tuborg Boulevard 12. DK-2900 Hellerup
Da begge advokatvirksomheder
Rödstenen og Lundgrens
Direkte imod klientens instrukser.
Bevidst og uhæderligt har modarbejdet klienten, og modarbejdet at klientens anklager og påstande imod Jyske Banks koncern, og imod Jyske Bank bestyrelse for medvirken til bankens svig og falsk ikke er blevet stoppet.
Hvor kunden første gang 19 maj retter henvendelse direkte til koncernledelsen Jyske Banks Ordstyrende formand CEO Anders Christian Dam
Med påstande som klientens advokater aldrig har blevet fremlagt for retten.
Da klienten opdager at deres advokat Lundgrens reelt arbejder for Jyske Bank A/S. ved Lundgrens Partner Niels Gram-Hanssen.
Bliver Lundgrens naturligvis fyret, du kan læse mere om klientens begrundelse nederst på siden her.
og læse breve der er overbragt til Lundgrens og partner Dan Terkildsen. som synes at være ansat til at hjælpe Jyske Bank A/S med at skuffe i retsforhold ved have planlagt at møde op til hovedforhandling 30 september 2019.
Uden at have fremlagt, en eneste af klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske banks koncern.
Kunden er blevet oplyst af en politimand “uden for referat” at sagen er politisk, hvorfor politiet har nægtet efterforske forbrydelsen mod dem, og at politiet derfor ikke vil hjælpe, med at stoppe bankens fortsatte svig forbrydelser, svig som Jyske Banks koncernledelse er en del af.
Hvis der er tale om misforståelser er koncernen gentagende siden 19. maj 2016 blevet kontaktet for at hjælpe deres kunde.
Kunde der mener at jyske bank har skjult bilag manipuleren med datoer og aftale bilag, og bevidst udsat kunden for svig og lavet falsk.
🙂
Har du spørgsmål, eller fundet noget som ikke er sandt.
Ring til os på +4522227713
Således vi straks kan rette eventuelle fejl på siden. Vi ønsker ikke at beskylde Jyske bank for Bedrageri og at lave dokumentfalsk hvis det ikke passer.
Vi ønsker heller ikke at beskylde Jyske bank A/S for at have bestukket eller betalt Lundgrens advokater,for ikke at fremlægge vores påstande i retten.
Hvis det ikke passer så skal vi straks rette fejlen og beklage.
Husk det her er kun en anderledes og nok for mange en morsom måde forsøge at komme i dialog og kontakt med Jyske bank, således vi som voksne kan tale om det her.
Nej vi holder ikke kæft
måske Jyske bank har lukket i, og ikke vil sige et ord, men vi har behov for at tale om dette her, da vi synes Jyske Banks bestyrelse skal tale med deres kunder, der siger at hov i laver da vist bedrageri her.
🙂
Donation to lawyer assistance against Jyske bank A/S for gross fraud
carried out and continued by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors since May 2016
in association. received
IBAN DK0854790004563376.
Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.
It is a great thing for legal certainty in Denmark that a Danish bank is allowed by the police to commit crime. Or does the new chief of police or the Minister of Justice have a good explanation, no politicians or authorities will help stop Jyske Bank’s fraud charges against us customers.
ER LUNDGRENS KORUPTE
Can Danish Banks as Jyske bank be trusted ? NO
MED LOV SKAL LAND BYGGE
Det betyder at alle skal overholde loven, og ingen skal undergrave staten, ved at indgå aftaler om ikke at blive efterforsket for bedrageri, om det er mod betaling eller andet.
Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt and is the Danske Bank Jyske bank fraudulent.
Read with and judge if these are Conspiracy theories as Partner Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren’s lawyer partner company claims.
Please read some of the many letters we have sent to Lundgrens, the court and Rørdtenen attorneys since 2016, to present our claims against JYSKE BANK FOR FRAUD AND FALSE.
And read what Lundgrens presents, it is not where we have given Lundgren’s instructions to submit.
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
If you have any questions then call +4522227713
best regards The Skaarup family from Hornbaek
Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbark
DK. Denmark.
Hovedforhandling i stor svindel sag mod jyske bank
30. September &
1. Oktober
Main hearing in large fraud case against JyskeBank 30th of September & October 1 is listed after apparent problems with a corrupt lawyer
Who only 30 days before the main hearing, the court submits the client’s evidence of fraud, and to file client claims.
Or to share the case with the client, need to see a few letters to Lundgren’s lawyers, then you will understand that they are probably corrupt
A fraud case that ends up being about bribery in some of Denmark’s largest law firms and Danish banks.
If CEO Ander Christian Dam has another explanation, our number is +4522227713
And wants Jyske Bank’s group management to admit that we are exposed to fraud, and the Board has been aware of this fraud and false at least since May 2016.
01-09-2019 Remember this is only one of maybe 100 letters and mails to Lundgrens where we ask them to present our case against Jysk Bank A/S Silkeborg Denmark
Lundgren’s attorneys must be visually impaired and more blind than their client.
or even Jyske Bank A/S paid Jyske Bank many millions in return commission, to help cover Jyske Bank’s fraud and false and disappoint in residual conditions.
02-09-2019 1/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 2/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 3/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 4/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
02-09-2019 5/5 The client’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen. Lawyer and Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistant. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Clerk / Student Emil Hald Winstrøm. Clerk / Student Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Attorney Director at Lundgren’s partner company cannot read and understand Danish, the question is whether Jyske Bank’s group management has really bribed Lundgrens attorneys to counter their client’s case was brought to court, and Jo Dan Terkildsen you say there are conspiracy theories! are you sure
5479 – 4563376 Nykredit
IBAN DK0854790004563376.
Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.
CEO Anders Dam Siger nej tak til dialog med sur kunde, efter bankens mange års bedrageri. Ønsker ikke at tale med kunde, men beder om en dom i den sag BS-1-698/2015 Hvori Koncernledelsen af kunde anklages, for meddelagtighed i groft svig Hvilket er udført af den samlede koncernledelsen i forening
HJÆLP MIG I AT SAGSØGE JYSKE BANK for Bedrageri, falsk svig
Just see the letter of September 1, 2019. to Lundgren’s lawyers with clear instructions that the case is a fraud, and we claim that Appendix 1.
a swap from 16-07-2008 is false.
And we will summon 9 witnesses.
Compare the Prosecution 2. which Lundgrens submits to the court on September 2, 2019,
And will share some copies with the client. Lundgrens writes in Prosecution 2.
Nothing that the case is presented with allegations of fraud and false.
Lundgrens has removed 7 of the client’s 9th witnesses.
Lundgrens change the client’s claim that Appendix 1. is false, that Appendix 1. the swap is agreed.
LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER
Dan Terkildsen
Efter som hverken
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
Eller nogle andre i Lundgrens aldrig har ville fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Om Lundgrens advokater af Jyske Banks Koncern har fået bestikkelse i form af retur kommision, syntes Lundgrens advokat partner selskab ikke i skulle tilbage betale de penge i uberettiget har fået
And when we fire Lundgrens you will not repay our money.
they Dan terkildsen think they have done a great job, but it must be for the counterparty Jyske Bank A/S.
This is about your legal certainty.
Because if it turns out to be politicians, who stand behind and support that Jyske bank must not be investigated for fraud by the police,
With such clear evidence of both document false and mandatory fraud, then something is wrong in Denmark.
Where does Lundgren’s board stand in this fraud case, against Jyske bank, everyone is involved,
or only the client the 5 lawyers we have mentioned.
these 5 lawyers.
at Lundgren’s partner company
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
🙂
Not funny.
But just try to read the letters we have sent, find them in our case, or follow along here.
Direktør & Chief Operating Officer
MARTIN KIRKEGAARD
DIREKTØR & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Bestyrelse
MICHAEL ALSTRØM
FORMAND
/
THOMAS KRÆMER
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
NINA RINGEN
/
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
TOBIAS VIETH
/
BESTYRELSESMEDLEM
NIELS WIVE KJÆRGAARD
ADVOKAT (H)
Jyske bank salgs parker
KLOVTOFTE, VRIDSLØSELILLE, TAASTRUP, TAASTRUP VALBY, ALBERTSLUND, VALLENSBÆK NORDMARK, VALLENSBÆK LANDSBY, GLOSTRUP, BRØNDBYVESTER, BRØNDBYØSTER, AVEDØRE, VIGERSLEV, HVIDOVRE, VALBY, KALVEBOD STRAND, ISHØJ LANDSBY, HUNDIGE, TRANEGILDE, ISHØJ, VALLENSBÆK STRAND, AVEDØRE STATIONSBY, BRØNDBY STRAND, AVEDØRE HOLME, KALVEBODERNE.