Her er de første breve sendt til Jyske Banks advokat og Jyske Banks koncernledelse.
Hvor kunde beder Jyske Banks bestyrelse om at holde op med at lave bedrageri.
Alle breve er fremlagt og medtaget i retten.
Bilag 104. 122. 99. 85. 86. 87. 88. 133. 134. Fremlægges 169.
Jyske Bank’s group still has not wanted to stop the bank’s continued fraudulent transactions, and still refuses dialogue.
Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem tidligere Koncernchef i Nykredit.
Is all behind Jyske Bank’s continuing fraud, which must be to the detriment of the customer as much as possible.
Since these letters have been forwarded to Jyske Bank’s group management, the Board of Directors must believe that their client knows nothing about their lawyer from Lundgren’s work for Jyske Bank, and that may be why the Board of Directors refuses to expose special selected weak customers for scams.
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community.
This takes advantage of the large Danish bank Jyske Bank’s board, which, like a bunch of criminal finance people, stand together to deceive their customer.
With a board of directors refusing to stop the group board, fraudulent transactions against the bank’s customer, which has stood alone for the past 43 months.
And a Danish police, who has refused to investigate Jyske Bank A/S and the bank’s management for complicity in fraud.
This has probably been to cover the crime of Danish banks, such as Document False, Fraud, Mandate fraud conducted by Jyske Bank A/S
Where client has been fighting since February 2016.
Just to get their now former lawyers who is.
Thomas Schioldan Sørensen from Rödstenen Attorneys from Aarhus.
And then.
Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren’s lawyers from Copenhagen.
To present their many allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for exploitation and gross fraud.
Et af medlemmerne i Jyske Banks bestyrelse Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Adm. direktør, Gazprom Energy, fhv. koncerndirektør, Dong Energy, fhv. afdelingschef i Finansministeriet og adm. direktør i Økonomiforvaltningen, Københavns Kommune
As you can see in the shared letters, how difficult it is to get “corrupt” lawyers to help their clients present their claims in court.
We refer directly to Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.
Laughing it wasn’t just hard.
🙂
LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER
Dan Terkildsen
Efter som hverken
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner
Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.
Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev
Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
Eller nogle andre i Lundgrens aldrig har ville fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Om Lundgrens advokater af Jyske Banks Koncern har fået bestikkelse i form af retur kommision, syntes Lundgrens advokat partner selskab ikke i skulle tilbage betale de penge i uberettiget har fået.
Butquite impossible, which is pretty easy to see, when you read what the Client has continuously, written and instructed their attorneys as several of Lundgren’s attorneys to present.
Follow the blog.
Andread the many times we have given, the clearly corrupt Lundgren’s lawyers, Instructions on submitting our fraud allegations against the Jyske Bank Group, and where we repeatedly make Jyske Bank’s board responsible for the bank’s continued fraud.
Please read by letter which we share with date.
This small fraud case for Jysk bank should lie in the criminal court.
But when such a powerful organization as the Jyske Bank group is fraudulent, the bank’s board also has many powerful friends who obviously do not want the Danish banks to comply with the applicable law, nor for financial companies.
It is a huge societal problem when Danish banks are allowed to deceive their customers, without the police will intervene, and certainly also socially harmful business.
04-11-2018
Letter to Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen, regarding Philip Baruch meeting 02-11. It is maintained that there are 3 cases of mandated fraud and 2 cases of serious fraud.
03-11-2018. S.1-12.
For Lundgren’s claims, annex
In the timeline and our comments on our claims against Jyske bank.
.
This should not be misunderstood, except if Lundgrens was bribed for not being able to read Danish
03-11-2018. S.2-12.
For Lundgren’s claims, annex
In the timeline and our comments on our claims against Jyske bank.
.
This should not be misunderstood, except if Lundgrens was bribed for not being able to read Danish
11-12-2018. this is the original folder handed to Lundgrens
with our claims and appendices, explained on 40 pages.
–
compare with what Lundgrens presents 18-12-2018.
–
therefore we submit Appendices 28-101 December 28th. 2018
Lundgren’s lawyers never comment on or respond to the Client’s claims, as the case against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud is of such serious nature and Lundgren’s lawyers have not answered the client.
The client is therefore afraid that Lundgren’s lawyers have not understood
🙂
What the client must say.
Which is why we send our own folder with copies to the reception before 18-12-2018, with instructions that it is important Mette Marie Nielsen gets the folder to present, and information we would like to have our copy back soon. We do not get any response
Many times in 2018 and 2019 we have said and written to Lundgrens that the case must be presented as the fraud and fake we ask.
This is more to Lundgren’s information, we have taken photos of contents in our own delivered folder as well, as we took pictures of hospital records, so that we ourselves could present a copy, in somewhat inferior quality.
Lundgren’s lawyers still have not retuned the material of our case on 28-03-2020, which we wrote when we fired Lundgrens.
As you can also read in the timeline, with our claims, we give Lundgren’s attorneys instructions on 3-11-2018 to present our claims.
Just as we make the Management co-responsible in Jyske Bank’s continuing fraud business.
The first time Lundgren’s lawyer partnered company, responding to our charges against the Board of Directors, and the Board’s involvement and responsibility is 18-08-2019.
Where Lundgren’s Partner Dan Terkildsen rejects that Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has some responsibility.
01-09-2019 Remember this is only one of maybe 100 letters and mails to Lundgrens where we ask them to present our case against Jysk Bank A/S Silkeborg Denmark
Read what Lundgrens partner Dan Terkildsen chooses to present in court.
02-09-2019 1/5
02-09-2019 2/5
02-09-2019 2/5
02-09-2019 3/5
24-09-2019. page 1-6
Lundgren’s lawyers, 19 September 2019 were asked to answer a simple question:
Lundgrens works for Jyske bank A / S.
–
Lundgrens does not answer their client.
–
Lundgrens also decided that they would not share the allegation document 2 made by Lundgrens and presented the court on September 2, 2019.
–
Lundgrens, due to suspicion of carrying, has been bribed. then fired September 25, 2019.
–
Then the client himself 28-10-2019. had to present their claims against Jyske Bank A/S to the court.
24-09-2019.
24-09-2019.
24-09-2019.
24-09-2019.
24-09-2019. page 6-6
24-09-2019.
24-09-2019.
24-09-2019.
Click on the link and read all the pages of the customer’s claims here.
28-10-2019- Page 1-57.
If you want to help us financially against the Danish big bank Jyske Bank A/S.
–
We would like to receive your contribution.
IBAN NR. DK0854790004563376
–
Here in the case BS-402/2015-VIB.
The entire board supports whether Jyske bank A/S continued fraud against their customer.
–
Would you like to help with an economical contribution.
–
Now Jyske Bank seems to have bought our latest 2 law firms
Rödstenen and Lundgrens lawyers, not to present our claims against Jyske Bank A/S to the court.
–
Which is why we have had to make fun of ourselves with this closing defense.
28-10-2019- Page 2-57.
If you want to help us financially against the Danish big bank Jyske Bank A/S.
–
We would like to receive your contribution.
IBAN NR. DK0854790004563376
–
28-10-2019- Page 3-57.
If you want to help us financially against the Danish big bank Jyske Bank A/S.
–
We would like to receive your contribution.
IBAN NR. DK0854790004563376
–
Click on the link and read all the pages of the customer’s claims here.
And think about how many corrupt and lying lawyers there are in Denmark.
Danish lawyers who directly oppose that a judge can do their job and judge by the evidence.
Aswhen Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys provide false information in legal matters, and has presented manipulated “false” evidence, and deliberately conceals evidence with a view to disappoint in legal matters.
We have repeatedly stated to the court that Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater has lied in legal matters, that is, lied to the court.
The Court has not ruled on this information.
We regularly share the many letters to and from the lawyers who are supposed to have received payment or bribes from Jyske Bank’s group management, of course hidden as Return Commission.
Jyske Bank’s group must have paid Lundgren’s bribe, in order not to present some of their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.
If there is something you think is missing or do not understand.
Orsome in Jyske Bank’s group, Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys, Lundgren’s lawyers and Rödstenen lawyers who do not understand what we write.
So help us to correct any misunderstandings and start by re-reading our many letters calling for dialogue.
This post is a call to DIALOG.
Feelfree to send an SMS to 004522227713
🙂
We are a small customer, a small client who is deceived by Jyske Bank’s group.
But we are also a small mosquito, against Jyske Bank, which has a tremendous strength, which the Group exploits in the large unequal strength relationship, which by continuing fraud, in the hope that the bank’s victim can not afford to get a lawyer, to bring Jyske Bank’s gross fraud crimes against their customers to court.
Now that the police prefer to allow Jyske Bank to continue crimes against their customers, rather than to investigate whether the customer is right and Jyske Bank’s group are in fact criminals.
03-05-2015. S.1-2.
Appendix 104.
can not understand Jyske Bank Morten Ulrik Gade will not document whether we have borrowed the 4,328,000 claimed by the bank, we believe is subject to fraud
03-05-2015. S.2-2.
Appendix 104.
can not understand Jyske Bank Morten Ulrik Gade will not document whether we have borrowed the 4,328,000 claimed by the bank, we believe is subject to fraud
17-08-2015. S.1-3.
Appendix 122.
Jyske bank 17-08-2015 asks for due diligence revenue and account 1354141.
Morten Ulrik Gade Refuses to have responsibility and refuses us due diligence
17-08-2015. S.2-3.
Appendix 122.
Jyske bank 17-08-2015 asks for due diligence revenue and account 1354141.
Morten Ulrik Gade Refuses to have responsibility and refuses us due diligence
17-08-2015. S.3-3.
Appendix 122.
Jyske bank 17-08-2015 asks for due diligence revenue and account 1354141.
Morten Ulrik Gade Refuses to have responsibility and refuses us due diligence
20-04-2016. S.1-3.
Appendix 99.
If Morten Ulrik Gade proves that we have taken out a loan of 4,328,000 in Nykredit, this was denied by the bank, first after we have met Nykredit we will reply 18-10-2016 that we have not. Appendix. 30
20-04-2016. S.2-3.
Appendix 99.
If Morten Ulrik Gade proves that we have taken out a loan of 4,328,000 in Nykredit, this was denied by the bank, first after we have met Nykredit we will reply 18-10-2016 that we have not. Appendix. 30
Koncernen ledergruppe
Anders Dam
PeterStig Hansen
Contact information on those at Jyske Bank Group Management who know about Jyske Bank’s fraud operations without stopping them.
30-04-2017. S.1-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.2-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.3-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.4-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.5-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.6-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.7-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.8-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
30-04-2017. S.9-9. Letter to CEO Anders Dam Group Management, and Legal Director Peter Stig Hansen, informs that the customer is exposed to fraud and asks the Group. to govern – wishes to be presented as Appendix 169.
It is about that Management has personal responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud against customers is not stopped.
Contact information on those at Jyske Bank Group Management who know about Jyske Bank’s fraud operations without stopping them.
20-04-2016. S.3-3.
Appendix 99.
If Morten Ulrik Gade proves that we have taken out a loan of 4,328,000 in Nykredit, this was denied by the bank, first after we have met Nykredit we will reply 18-10-2016 that we have not. Appendix. 30
28-12-2017. S.1-4.
Appendix 85.
if Jyske Bank cannot provide proof of 2 swaps, one must be false, Rødstenen will not file fraud case against Jyske Bank, we must find a new lawyer who will, We find Lundgrens who unfortunately chooses to enter into cooperation with Jyske Bank
28-12-2017. S.2-4.
Appendix 85.
if Jyske Bank cannot provide proof of 2 swaps, one must be false, Rødstenen will not file fraud case against Jyske Bank, we must find a new lawyer who will, We find Lundgrens who unfortunately chooses to enter into cooperation with Jyske Bank
28-12-2017. S.3-4.
Appendix 85.
if Jyske Bank cannot provide proof of 2 swaps, one must be false, Rødstenen will not file fraud case against Jyske Bank, we must find a new lawyer who will, We find Lundgrens who unfortunately chooses to enter into cooperation with Jyske Bank
28-12-2017. S.4-4.
Appendix 85.
if Jyske Bank cannot provide proof of 2 swaps, one must be false, Rødstenen will not file fraud case against Jyske Bank, we must find a new lawyer who will, We find Lundgrens who unfortunately chooses to enter into cooperation with Jyske Bank
07-08-2018. S.1-5.
Appendix 86.
Asks Jyske Bank’s group to take responsibility and stop doing fraud, a hand-out for dialogue. the bank refuses to talk to the customer.
07-08-2018. S.2-5.
Appendix 86.
Asks Jyske Bank’s group to take responsibility and stop doing fraud, a hand-out for dialogue. the bank refuses to talk to the customer.
07-08-2018. S.3-5.
Appendix 86.
Asks Jyske Bank’s group to take responsibility and stop doing fraud, a hand-out for dialogue. the bank refuses to talk to the customer.
07-08-2018. S.4-5.
Appendix 86.
Asks Jyske Bank’s group to take responsibility and stop doing fraud, a hand-out for dialogue. the bank refuses to talk to the customer.
07-08-2018. S.5-5.
Appendix 86.
Asks Jyske Bank’s group to take responsibility and stop doing fraud, a hand-out for dialogue. the bank refuses to talk to the customer.
22-08-2018. S.1-3.
Appendix 87.
Requests Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors to respond and to stop making fraud, Management refuses to respond, and continues the bank’s fraud.
22-08-2018. S.2-3.
Appendix 87.
Requests Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors to respond and to stop making fraud, Management refuses to respond, and continues the bank’s fraud.
22-08-2018. S.3-3.
Appendix 87.
Requests Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors to respond and to stop making fraud, Management refuses to respond, and continues the bank’s fraud.
19-09-2018. S.1-4.
Appendix 88.
To Jyske Bank’s total corporate management, customer information we believe to be fraudulent, Management refuses to respond to their customer or to stop fraud.
19-09-2018. S.2-4.
Appendix 88.
To Jyske Bank’s total corporate management, customer information we believe to be fraudulent, Management refuses to respond to their customer or to stop fraud.
19-09-2018. S.3-4.
Appendix 88.
To Jyske Bank’s total corporate management, customer information we believe to be fraudulent, Management refuses to respond to their customer or to stop fraud.
19-09-2018. S.4-4.
Appendix 88.
To Jyske Bank’s total corporate management, customer information we believe to be fraudulent, Management refuses to respond to their customer or to stop fraud.
28-01-2019. S.1-2
Appendix 133.
Requires comments of 100 and 101. 28-01-2019. we do not know that the court has written to Lundgren’s 08-01-2019 that the court disregards Appendix 28-101. before 27-08-2019
28-01-2019. S.2-2
Appendix 133.
Requires comments of 100 and 101. 28-01-2019. we do not know that the court has written to Lundgren’s 08-01-2019 that the court disregards Appendix 28-101. before 27-08-2019
26-06-2019. S.1-2.
Appendix 134
To the Board of Directors we beg Jyske Bank not to deceive us anymore, but the Group Board of Directors refuses to respond or stop the bank’s continued fraud.
26-06-2019. S.2-2.
Appendix 134
To the Board of Directors we beg Jyske Bank not to deceive us anymore, but the Group Board of Directors refuses to respond or stop the bank’s continued fraud.