03-12-2019 KUNDE MÅTTE SELV LAVE DET AFSLUTTENDE SVARSKRIFT. FINAL PROCEDURE PAGE 1-52. DATE 28-10-2019. DANISH BANK JYSKE BANK IN MAJOR FRAUD CASE, PLAINTIFF DISCOVERS THAT JYSKE BANK HAS PAID THEIR LAWYER LUNDGREN’S RETURN COMMISSION, NOT TO PRESENT THE CLIENT’S CASE TO COURT. “BRIBERY” PRESENTED IN CASE BS-402/2015-VIB
During update
Our closing defense against Jyske Bank for fraud is bottom of the page.
We just have a great desire to dialogue with Jyske Bank A/S.
And which Jyske Bank’s board Which probably is just hiding behind Lund Elmer Sandager, and seemed to enjoy political protection against being investigated for fraud.
Our door is open, and Jyske Bank’s management is still welcome to discuss this together. the number is +4522227713
In the case BS-402/2015-VIB Where, among others, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen of Rödstenen lawyers, and lawyer and partner Dan Terkildsen of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, in bad faith have countered their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S For deliberate and continued gross fraud was never filed by the client’s attorneys. The client believes that both Rödstenen and Lundgrens have worked for Jyske bank in order to disappoint in legal matters. By not presenting the client’s claims to the court. The period during which Rödstenen and Lundgrens have countered their client’s case and claims, have been presented to the court, is during the period between February 2016 and until September 2019 Where the client is forced to fire Lundgren’s lawyers after discovering that Lundgrens, has worked for Jyske bank A/S in a 3 digit million trade. And therefore have been incompetent, and corrupt. The client is compelled to present the final litigation, which is 28/10/2019 If you cannot understand Lundgrens or Rödstenen’s attorneys have not submitted the client’s claims, so you can ask. Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99 Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35 Why the client should act as a lawyer himself, and make his final defense, as both Rödstenen Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen should be the client’s lawyer. The client is personally obliged to present the closing litigation 28-10-2019 according to which their lawyers have taken care of Jyske bank’s interests . And probably to disappoint in legal matters neither Rödstenen nor Lundgrens, submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S. If you cannot understand Lundgrens and Rödstenen’s attorneys, and why these law firms, directly against the client’s continuous instructions, have not presented any of the client’s claims against Jyske bank A/S. Then you can ask them yourself Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99 and Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35 Just ask why the client himself should act as a lawyer, and even had to make the closing defense. Since neither Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgrens by Dan Terkildsen would be the client’s lawyer. You can find the draft for the new front page that comes on the bank here. When we look at all the inquiries to our attorneys, we look at the mails and letters, we have written since February 2016 to Rödstenen’s attorneys Thomas Schioldan Sørensen. And to Lundgren’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen, until we fired them in September 2019. It is clear that both law firms has had an financial interests with Jyske Bank A/S certainly with Board member Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager as between man. But Dan Terkildsen believes, that everything are conspiracy theories, at the same time Philip Baruch strongly take distances from the fact that bribery between Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgrens took place . The question is just what the hell did Jyske Bank’s group have to hire Lundgrens for. When Jyske bank’s lawyer Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager , knew that Lundgrens had come on as our lawyer. We do not hide anything, and would like to talk about this here, therefore we play with open cards. The question is whether there are some, who can trust the Danish banks as we here provide evidence of operating fraudulent bank, and deliberately lying, and conceal the truth. Yes even to the seat, Jyske Bank board member Philip Baruch is lying at the same time that Lund Elmer Sandager is presenting manipulated evidence to disappoint in legal matters. If we are wrong why no one will talk to us at all. Don’t you see we actually want to have a dialogue with Jyske bank’s board of directors. Call and +4522227713 And let’s meet as adults. And you just have to go through the case with us. If we are wrong then there is nothing we would rather do, than bring the case against Jyske bank for fraud and false. And bring the chase out of court again because we don’t think this is hilarious.
Siger intet , og det siger alt
In Denmark, some of the largest criminal organizations , such as the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S, choose to make fraud crimes against their own customers.
While the group’s powerful political friends have certainly banned the police, the state attorney, the Ministry of Justice from interfering.
When banks like here Jyske Bank A/S with the group management and in the saddle unit CEO Anders Christian Dam.
Who are consciously and openly behind the bank’s continued fraud against small business customer , who just want to get in touch and get in dialogue with Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors for help to settle the matter.
Unfortunately no authorities will talk or help us, since Jyske Bank’s Group and Management obviously has been able to buy our latest 2 Lawyers, as the company, Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, by partner Dan Terkildsen.
We cannot find other explanations that both attorneys, Dan Terkildsen and Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, against the client’s instructions, have not submitted any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S .
The way Thomas Schioldan Sørensen has behaved several times, seen in the rearview mirror, has been to help Jyske Bank’s group disappoint in legal matters.
If you have any questions about Jyske Bank, please use this number 004589898989 as the management will hardly be disturbed with such small matters .
Can say, this is something of an odd strength relationship, the only thing we can do right now, while our new lawyer is getting started, after Rödstenen and Lundgren’s lawyers.
Is to write the truth about the men of power in Denmark.
And that the words
MED LOV SKAL MAN LAND BYGGE
WITH LAW MUST LAND BUILD / with law you shall country build . a well-known phrase on the court house has faded a lot.
You are very welcome to follow up on the case against Jyske Bank Case No. BS-402/2015-VIB
Anden 🦆
Anders Dam
Call os at 004522227713
Anders Christian Dam Topleder CEO i Jyske Bank Anders Christian Dam Topleder CEO i Jyske Bank Can Danish Banks as Jyske bank be trusted ? NO 13-09-2019 WHEN DAN TERKILDSEN LUNDGREN’S ATTORNEYS, WHO SHOULD BE THE CLIENT’S LAWYER, AGAINST JYSKE BANK A/S. COUNTERACT THE CLIENT’S CLAIMS ARE PRESENTED TO THE COURT. – It is quite clear that these are not errors. But it is quite clear that Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors wants to continue to make fraud against the bank’s customer. The question is whether it is political interests that are the reason why the police must not investigate Jyske Bank and the Board of Directors contributing to the bank’s ongoing fraud. Jyske Bank A/S that has strong ties to several political parties. For example, has the new chairman of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. Kurt Bligaard Pedersen has been Social Democratic Advisor. Kurt Bligaard Pedersen was Head of Department in the Ministry of Finance, and Managing Director of the Finance Administration in the City of Copenhagen. So this Danske Bank, Jyske Bank A/S has such good contact with the Danish state, and the government party. It was the Danish state that gave Jyske Bank 4 aid packages in 2008/2009. Did the Parliament not think Jyske Bank should soon be investigated for fraud, and let a judge judge the evidence. Instead of politically preventing the Danes from having any legal certainty. If not, the victim himself, who has to fight against an entire organization, must be able to present their fraud allegations to Jyske Bank, even in the district court, which apparently also lied to the court, and used bribes to disappoint in legal matters.? ASK IF IT DOES NOT OPINION WE DEFINITELY DEFEND OUR STATE. AND WILL CORRECT THE ERROR IF THERE IS SOMETHING. We can be contacted at +4522227713 Best regards the small business And the Skaarup family from Hornbaek Denmark This is a call to all involved in this fraud case. To think and remember that. Dialogue promotes understanding
Det handler om ære og om at drive en hæderlig bank Anders Christian Dam det har du lovet i 2016 til BT, efter skattely sagerne , at Jyske Bank i fremtiden ville du drive en hæderlig bank. It is about honor and running a reputable bank Anders Christian Dam that you promised in 2016 to BT, after the tax cases, that in the future you Jyske Bank would run a reputable bank. The fraud case is presented and described in the closing reply 28/10-2019 / An open question for Lundgren’s lawyers and the Board of Directors and the Executive Board, by Martin Kirkegaard, Michael Alstrøm, Thomas Kræmer, Nina Ringen, Tobias Vieth, Niels Wive Kjærgaard. Why does Lundgren’s lawyer have partner company, by Niels Gram-Hanssen. For Jyske Bank A/S Board of Directors of the Group Board: Sven Buhrkall, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, Rina Asmussen, Philip Baruch, Jens A. Borup, Anker Laden-Andersen, Keld Norup Per Schnack, Christina Lykke Munk, Johnny Christensen, Marianne Lillevang. Executive Management: Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt. Chosen to receive a 2 digit million assignment from Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. At the same time with at least these lawyers. Dan Terkildsen, Pernille Hellesøe, Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen and the students Emil Hald Winstrøm and Mette Marie Nielsen. At least the above lawyers from the law firm Lundgrens Partner Selskab, formerly Rønne & Lundgren. Has received the Client’s Instructions to present the client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank A/S. When no one in Lundgrens presents any of the client’s claims to the court. Ask Jyske Bank’s client directly to Lundgren’s lawyers. This is because Jyske Bank’s group management, perhaps by CEO Anders Christian Dam, has personally been responsible for bribing Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. If the Danish police did not already cover Jyske Bank’s fraud transactions, against the customer, by refusing to interrogate, and opposed the investigation of Jyske Bank and the Board of Fraud. Would this case, which now also deals with bribery, be a job for the rear police. It is the job of the police to stop the crimes, including the financial crimes, and not the victim himself, to investigate, and fight against, the seemingly organized crime. Has Jyske Bank given Lundgrens a million agreement against Lundgrens not having to submit their client’s fraud claims against Jyske Bank A/S And against the bank’s Board of Directors for contributing to the bank’s continued fraud business against the bank’s customer. When Lundgrens, instead, directly opposed the Client’s Instructions, chose to change the client’s claims by not answering the client, and then manipulating the client’s fraud claims, which Lundgren’s partner Dan Terkildsen would never submit to the courts. The case of the Danske Bank Fraud, therefore, was first presented in the district court on October 28, 2019, after the client fired Lundgren’s lawyer partner company on suspicion of corruption, before the Client could even present their fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank’s group. If Lundgren’s Partner Company does not even see them appear corrupt, it is probably because Lundgren’s lawyers have been bribed, and therefore corrupt.
Sygeforsikring kontakt Lundgrens eller Lund Elmer Sandager Here lies a sick customer Well the dog looks after Who Jyske bank is in the process of deceiving. If the group doesn’t think so, it will never detect the idiot. A small part from the customer diary tries to write it with a twinkle in his eye, even though only Jyske bank is having fun. Meet the man there with his special kind of humer, has fought his way back to life And who still struggles against a “not an apparent” But a criminal organization. Where the customer defies all ods, after, to have been cheated by Jyske Bank, but this is first discovered by the customer in 2016, for Jyske Bank there are many who work together on this fraud. The customer, who in 2009 suffered a major brain haemorrhage, epilepsy, and then a year-long depression that nearly cost the customer life, for a long period of time when the client was ill, Casper Dam Olsen called almost daily demands and pressed the customer to the extreme. The bank has forced the customer to sell building land, this denies Jyske bank, both by Morten Ulrik Gade and Birgit Buch Thuesen, which we here call the green butcher, since Jyske bank refuses to have anything to do with the basic sale, and refuses, as the customer’s bank, to take in the proceeds. And when Jyske Bank refuses as the customer’s bank to receive the proceeds from the basic sale, it must be for the customer to be extruded in order to break, so that the bank can take everything from the customer who does not know that they are exposed to fraud Jyske Bank continues to exploit the fact that the customer does not know that Jyske bank has manipulated multiple documents, and in addition has used expired and invalid power of attorney to try to discover loans for a proceeding that the customer had rejected. Jyske Bank has succeeded in concealing a fraud from fraud in the period 16-07-2008 and until February 2016, and document false, and simple deception, or fraud. In 2013 and still hard pressed by Jyske Bank, which constantly demands a customer to sign more and more, if the customer does not sign, Jyske bank just pulls the customer into the sewer The customer survives the meeting with the green butcher in Silkeborg. Who tries to take the client’s property from the customer, blocking all the client’s accounts, so that the customer can not buy the expensive medical prescribed epilepsy medication, or food for his family. The fact that the customer also took on the circular saw with Casper Dam Olsen in 2009/2010 is threatened with the life, of former employees who stole from the customer’s business, while at the same time Jyske bank exposed the customer to fraud, which Jyske Bank still does Casper Dam Olsen and Anette Kirkeby want the customer to sell a large building plot in Espergærd, as the plot has been sold. Jyske Bank refuses to open a deposit account, and therefore it takes about 3 years. after the customer of Jyske bank is forced to pay interest on the proceeds that Jyske bank has refused to receive Since Jyske Bank also demanded the customer’s private house sold, well to satisfy the greedy shareholders of Jyske bank, which obviously requires Jyske bank cheat their customers so that the shareholders can get their dividends. Jyske bank, more precisely Casper Dam Olsen, to Anette Kirkeby in the bank said that if the land was not sold the bank would require a sales authorization. In 2013, the customer is required to sell 2nd sales proxies, both the customer’s private house and a commercial property. The bank has also taken out pledges and collateral for about DKK 11,000,000 against a debt to Jyske Bank of about DKK 3,000,000 Debt in 2020 has been reduced to DKK 1,500,000 but Jyske Bank still has the same collateral security. That this can only be to keep the customer in the bank’s iron grip, and the dependency relationship the bank has since 2008/2009 has grossly exploited. Meanwhile, the bank exposes the customer to continued fraud, and this has happened at least since 2016 with the approval of the Board of Directors. The customer who does not intend to die The customer who does not intend to die, Although it was close, and must have been Jyske Bank’s greatest wish, as the bank cannot have avoided knowing everything that the Group exposed the customer to very gross exploitation and fraud. The family has kept together and are now fighting together to get Jyske Bank convicted of fraud, but since the police have chosen to keep their hand over Jyske Bank And refused to help the victim, the customer can only bring the case even in civil court, as a Fraud case. Which the last 2 lawyers Rødstenen and Lundgrens have counteracted, and that with great likelihood of villa disappoint in legal matters. Which is the last 2 lawyers Rödstenen Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, and Lundgrens lawyer Partner company. by Partner Dan Terkildsen has counteracted no evidence presented to the court. And it is with very high probability, 99.99% to disappoint in legal matters. About Rödstenen and Lundgrens has received a return commission from Jyske bank A/S Should be a case for the backman police to investigate, so Lundgrens may very busy cleaning up. The case is far more lenient for Danish society than for the customer. It is about the legal security of the people. Because no one can get the police help when the crime is carried out by one of the largest banks in Denmark In short, the crime is serious enough, so there is no help.
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. – HAR JYSKE BANKS LEDELSE BESTUKKET LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER Et åbent spørgsmål til Lundgrens advokater og Bestyrelse og direktion. Svig sagen er fremlagt og beskrevet i det afsluttende svarkrift 28-10-2019 Ved Martin Kirkegaard, Michael Alstrøm, Thomas Kræmer, Nina Ringen, Tobias Vieth, Niels Wive Kjærgaard. Hvorfor har Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, ved Niels Gram-Hanssen. For Jyske Bank A/S Bestyrelse ved Koncernbestyrelsen: Sven Buhrkall, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen, Rina Asmussen, Philip Baruch, Jens A. Borup, Anker Laden-Andersen, Keld Norup Per Schnack, Christina Lykke Munk, Johnny Christensen, Marianne Lillevang, Koncern Direction: Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt. Da Lundgrens valgt at modtage en 2 cifret million opgave fra Jyske Banks bestyrelse og ikke efterfølgende Fremlægger vores sag mod Jyske Bank for domstolene, kommer tankerne hen på BESTIKKELSE. Samtidig med mindst disse advokater. Dan Terkildsen, Pernille Hellesøe, Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen og eleverne Emil Hald Winstrøm og Mette Marie Nielsen. Mindst de ovennævnte advokater fra advokatfirmaet Lundgrens Partnerselskab, tidligere Rønne & Lundgren. Har modaget Klientens Instrukser på at fremlægge klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S. Når ingen i Lundgrens fremlægger nogle af klientens påstande for retten. Spørger Jyske Bank’s kunde direkte Lundgrens advokater. Om det er fordi Jyske Banks koncernledelse, måske ved CEO Anders Christian Dam personligt har stået bag bestikkelse af Lundgrens advokat partner selskab. Hvis det danske politi ikke allerede dækkede over Jyske Banks svig forretninger, imod kunde, ved at nægte afhøring, og modsatte sig efterforskning af Jyske bank og bestyrelsen for Bedrageri. Ville denne her sag, der nu også omhandler bestikkelses, være et job for bagmandspolitiet. Det er politits opgave at stoppe forbrydelser, også de økonomiske forbrydelser, og ikke offeret selv der skal efterforske, og kæmpe imod, den tilsyneladende organiseret kriminalitet. Har Jyske Bank givet Lundgrens en million aftale, mod at Lundgrens ikke måtte fremlægge deres klients svig påstande, imod Jyske Bank A/S Og mod bankens Bestyrelsen for medvirken til bankens fortsatte svig forretninger imod bankens kunde. Når Lundgrens istedet direkte imod Klientens Instrukser, har valgt at ændre klientens påstande, ved dels ikke at svar klienten, og så manipulere med klientens svig påstande, som Lundgrens partner Dan Terkildsen aldrig har ville fremlægge fremlægge for domstolene. Sagen om den Danske Banks Jyske Banks Bedrageri, blev derfor først fremlagt i byretten 28 Oktober 2019, efter at klienten fyrede Lundgrens advokat partner selskab grundet mistanke om korruption, før klienten selv kunne få fremlagt deres svig og falsk påstande imod Jyske Banks koncern. Hvis Lundgrens Partnerselskab ikke selv se de virker korrupte, er det nok fordi Lundgrens advokater er blevet bestukket, og derfor korrupte.! Men kære Lundgrens Og Jyske Bank samt deres advokat Lund Elmer Sandager. Vi anmoder jo bare om at mødes og så sammen gennem denne her, for Jyske Bank lille svig sag. 🙂 Dialog med Jyske Banks bestyrelse og direktion samt deres mange advokater, er forsøgt siden 2016. Med tilbud om bespisning og kaffemøde. Vi sendte senest en invitation til Havkatten på Facebook, altså før Jyske Bank blokerede os der. Vi fik ikke noget svar. Men sad 1 time og ventede på, at måske Nicolai Hansen ville dukke op, så var vi parate til at tilgive, hvis der bare var tale om nogle fejl og misforståelser. DER KOM INGEN OG INGEN HAR VILLE INDRØMME OG UNDSKYLDE AT DAN TERKILDSEN I 2019 PÅ LUNDGRENS KONTOR SAGDE AT JYSKE BANK VIL GÅ MED TIL AT BEKLAGE I ET EVENTUELT FORLIG. UDEN AT SIGE HVAD JYSKE BANK VILLE BEKLAGE. DET HAR VI KUN FRA LUNDGRENS. SOM PÅ DET TIDSPUNKT ARBEJDER FOR JYSKE BANK Tiden er gået, 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Og nu skriver vi 2020. HVAD FANDEN SKER DER I DANMARK. Anders Dam Ring nu og lad os mødes 004522227713 Bedste hilsner fra Storbjerg Erhverv Dette her opslag er trods alt din, og bestyrelses ansvar sammen med Lund Elmer Sandager.
HVAD ER VÆRST Penge vask eller Bedrageri Eller at bruge bestikkelse. vi ønsker kun at jyske bank skal indrømme og starte med at undskylde 🙁 Jyske Bank’s board member Philip Baruch, for Jyske Bank and Lund Elmer Sandager, was present at Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, shown on 3 November. 2018. Lundgren’s lawyer and partner Dan Terkildsen writes afterwards that the meeting did not lead to anything, without disclosing what has been talked about or has made a brief summary. We only know that Lundgren’s subsequent direct counteracted their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S has been presented. But what was agreed between the parties Lundgren’s lawyer partner company and Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater? Perhaps Lundgrens should probably help Jyske Bank to keep the Client’s claims against Jyske Bank out of court. 🙁 Jyske Banks bestyrelses medlem Philip Baruch, har for Jyske Bank og Lund Elmer Sandager været til møde ved Lundgrens advokat partner selskab. Vist 3 nov. 2018. Lundgrens advokat og partner Dan Terkildsen skriver bagefter, at mødet ikke førte til noget, uden at oplyse hvad der er blevet talt om, eller om har lavet et kort resumé. Vi ved kun at Lundgrens efterfølgende direkte har modarbejdet deres klients påstande imod Jyske Bank A/S er blevet fremlagt. Men hvad blev der aftalt mellem parterne Lundgrens advokat partner selskab og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater ? Måske at Lundgrens nok skulle hjælpe Jyske Bank med at holde Klientens påstande mod Jyske Bank ude fra retten.
A customer who alone has gone up against Denmark’s probably biggest fraud organization consisting of, among other things, a large Danish bank.
Even though you probably laugh at our bad Danes, you are an Evil man Anders Dam, If you do not want to stop deceiving us, we ask Jyske Bank not to expose us to fraud. Will you please speak with us, say if Jyske Bank does not lie to us and the courts.?
En kunde som alene er gået op imod Danmarks nok største svindel organation bestående af blandt andet en stor dansk bank.
REMEMBER THAT EVERY POLICE OR THE STATE LAW WOULD HAVE TO HEAR THE REPORTER IN THIS LITTLE FRAUD CASE.
HUSK AT HVERKEN POLITIET ELLER STATSADVOKATEN HAR VILLE AFHØRER ANMÆLDER I DENNE HER LILLE SVIG SAG.
Can Danish Banks as Jyske bank be trusted ? Det er jo ret tydeligt at her er ikke tale om nogle fejl. Men det er helt bevidst at Jyske Banks bestyrelse ønsker at fortsætte med at lave bedrageri mod bankens kunde. Spørgsmålet er om det er politiske interesser, som er grunden, til at politiet ikke må efterforske Jyske Bank og Bestyrelsens medvirkende til bankens fortsatte svindel. Jyske Bank A/S der har stærke bånd til flere politiske partier, eksempel har den nye formand for Jyske Banks bestyrelse. Kurt Bligaard Pedersen været Socialdemokratisk rådgiver, afdelingschef i Finansministeriet og administrerende direktør i Økonomiforvaltningen i Københavns Kommune. Så denne Danske Bank, Jyske Bank A/S har særdeles gode kontakt til den danske stat, og regerings partiet. Det var den danske stat som gav Jyske Bank 4 hjælp pakker i 2008/2009. Synes folketinget ikke snart Jyske Bank bør blive efterforsket for bedrageri, og lade en dommer dømme efter beviserne. Frem for politisk at forhindre at danskerne har nogle retssikkerhed. Således det ikke, skal værer offeret selv, der skal kæmpe mod en hel organisation, for selv i byretten at fremlægge deres svig påstande mod Jyske Bank, det tilsyneladende også har løjet over for retten, og brugt bestikkelse for at skuffe i retsforhold.? SPØRG HVIS DET IKKE GIVER MENING VI FORSVARE GERNE VORES PÅSTANDE. OG RETTER GERNE FEJL, HVIS DER DA ER NOGLE. Vi kan kontaktes på +4522227713 MHV Den lille virksomhed Og familien Skaarup fra Hornbaek Danmark Dette er en opfordring til alle de involverede i denne her svig sag. Til at tænke og huske på at. Dialog fremmer forståelsen
Jyske Bank er en bank som har magtfulde og indflydelsesrige politiske venner.
Eller har Lundgrens advokater ikke kunne forstå det Klienten, klart bad Lundgrens advokater om at fremlægge i deres sag mod Jyske Bank A/S for svig.
Lundgrens advokater skriver de er personligt optaget af din forretning. Men står til at blive indberettet. At modtage retur kommision eller bare for at modarbejde klientens påstande mod Jyske Bank koncernen bliv fremlagt i byretten ? Hvad er Lundgrens egen forklaring Spørgsmålet er hvilken forretning Lundgrens advokater mener For når Lundgrens vælge at samarbejde med modparten Jyske Bank A/S Hvor Klienten beder Lundgrens advokater om at fører en svig sag imod selv samme Jyske Bank A/S. Her kommer sandheden om Jyske Banks fortatte svigforretninger imod bankens mange årige kunde, og om Lundgrens advokater der bevidst har modarbejdet klientens instrukser. MEN GØR DET LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER KORRUPTE ? SPØRGER TIDLIGERE KLIENT LUNDGRENS BESTYRELSES OM
Niels Gram-Hanssen ADVOKATPARTNER EMAIL NGH@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2919 MOBIL 2524 5119 Sorry Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, but can not help but think about your lawyer and partner Dan Terkildsen, said in Lundgren’s office, August 13, 2019, about the fact that Dan Terkildsen could not know if there were other lawyers at Lundgrens, who worked for Jyske Bank A/S and said that it is a big office ?. But Dan Terkildsen did not really know that his colleague and partner, Niels Gram-Hanssen for Lundgren’s partner company, helped to advise Jyske Bank’s group, with the bank’s sale of several properties for about DKK 600,000,000. What do you talk about at your partner meetings, Yes sorry we ask, but thought Lundgren’s lawyers is a bit of a shady lawyer company. Finally, call us if this is something we have misunderstood, of course you also apply to Anders Christian Dam
Er det kun partner Dan Terkildsen og det net, dan er ledende advokat for, som er lidt små rådden i fundamentet. 🙂
Kan Lundgrens Partner og advokater ikke selv se.
At det er meget forkert at i lærer jeres dygtige advokater og jeres elever / fuldmægtige, at direkte modarbejde jeres klienter.
Dan Terkildsen ADVOKATPARTNER EMAIL DAT@LUNDGRENS.DK TELEFON 3525 2850 MOBIL 2811 9513 Read the closing reply letter from 28-10-2019 as Lundgren’s lawyers. Or as Lundgren’s lawyer partner company has most likely been paid not to appear in the city court. Or in some Danish it, as the former client of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, had to write and present himself in court. As Lundgren’s lawyers had probably been bribed by the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S to counter the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud was not presented. We want Lundgren’s lawyers to be investigated for taking bribes from Jyske Bank’s group. In the form of a return commission. Would you like to help us with that, asks the client who fired Lundgren’s lawyers just on suspicion of corruption in Lundgren’s lawyer partner company . / DAN TERKILDSEN Bestyrelse MICHAEL ALSTRØM FORMAND. THOMAS KRÆMER BESTYRELSESMEDLEM. NINA RINGEN BESTYRELSESMEDLEM. TOBIAS VIETH BESTYRELSESMEDLEM. NIELS WIVE KJÆRGAARD ADVOKAT (H) Former client / Client asks Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. – First. Has the Jyske Bank Group accused Lundgren’s lawyers not to submit your client’s fraud charges against Jyske Bank A/S – 2nd. Has Lundgren’s lawyer partner company taken a million orders from Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors / Management shortly after Lundgren’s February 5, 2018 was assigned to file a fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S – Third. Now, Lundgren’s lawyers do not intend to deny their cooperation with Jyske Bank’s Group management well. It’s just a very simple YES or NO. – 4th. It was Lundgren’s lawyer partner company who, after February 5, 2018, contacted Management in Jyske Bank A/S – 5th. Or was it the management of the Jyske Bank Group There, directly and even contact Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, to offer Lundgren’s lawyers a million deal. If yes Who in the Jyske Bank Group contact Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, with an offer to advise Jyske Bank Group management on the bank’s sale of properties for DKK 600,000,000. Who in Lundgren’s lawyer partner company has Jyske Bank’s Group contact, to get Lundgren’s lawyers to help Jyske Bank Group. – 6. Therefore, Lundgren’s lawyer Partner Company has not submitted any of their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S ! If we have not been clear enough, what have we not explained well enough? More when the next customers Lundgrens files more cases against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud. Hope this is not too difficult questions for Lundgren’s lawyers. Such questions may well be answered by the Lundgrens Board of Directors. So that’s why dear Lundgrens You can use the same number 0045 22227713 The same number in has us hidden under. Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. You must very well explain. + Don’t use Rödstenen or Lundgren’s attorneys, as they may seem to be bought or bribed by the opposing party, to counteract your case, to disappoint in legal matters. If you want to try a fake law firm, try contacting Lundgren’s lawyer partner company they took our ass and started working for the counterparty Jyske Bank, while Lundgrens has done their best to hurt our case against Jyske Bank for fraud. + But if you need your lawyer to lie directly in legal matters, to disappoint in the legal relationship, we recommend that you contact Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys, ask Partner Philip Baruch, here they have their own law book. See the few appendices and ask Lundgrens and Jyske Bank if a return commission has been used, so as not to present any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S
Skulle alle disse have misforstået de svig og falsk påstande, Lundgrens advokater skulle fremlægge mod Jyske Bank A/S
Eller har Jyske Bank, helt enkelt bare betalt Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, for at misforstå hvad Klienten beder Lundgrens om at fremlægge, dette er et enkelt spørgsmål til Lundgrens advokater.
Velkommen til jyske bank Jyske Bank er en anderledes bank. Her vil Bestyrelsen gerne stå sammen om at fortsætte det svig, som kunde mange gange har anmodet bestyrelsen om at holde op med.
Venner vil vel gerne hjælper Jyske Bank A/S, med ikke at blive efterforsket for svig / bedrageri imod bankens egne kunder.
Politi mesteren og statsadvokaten der nægtede at lade Jyske Bank A/S koncernen, og Jyske Banks bestyrelse undersøge, og efterforske for ledelsen medvirken til bankens fortsatte svig / bedrageri imod bankens kunde.
Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Næstformand næstformand i Jyske Banks bestyrelse. Kurt Bligaard Pedersen står til at overtage formandsposten i Jyske Bank A/S efter Sven Buhrkal Dermed får Jyske bank A/S en ny formand, som også har siddet centralt placeret i det politiske system, blandt andet som rådgiver for, Socialdemokratiet (S). – 🙂 Vice Chairman of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. Kurt Bligaard Pedersen to take over the chairmanship of Jyske Bank A/S after Sven Buhrkal Thus, Jyske bank gets a new chairman, who has also been centrally located in the political system, including as adviser to the Social Democracy (S). / Jyske Bank’s entire board Koncernbestyrelsen Sven Buhrkall Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Rina Asmussen Philip Baruch Jens A. Borup Anker Laden-Andersen Keld Norup Per Schnack Christina Lykke Munk Johnny Christensen Marianne Lillevang Koncerndirektionen Anders Dam Niels Erik Jakobsen Per Skovhus Peter Schleidt Knows that the bank’s customer just wants a dialogue with Jyske Bank’s group. No one can doubt how funny Jyske Bank’s board of directors thought this is. While the bank’s board member Philip Baruch has repeatedly provided detailed fake and false information to the court Whether it was too funny, or deliberate to present untrue information to the courts, to disappoint in legal matters. whether Jyske Bank has used bribery of Lundgren’s lawyers, not to submit their client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank. We just ask Jyske Bank’s board about putting ourselves together as adult people, and in all, looking at our case in the timeline that our new lawyer has to present. Is Jyske Bank’s foundation rooted. Driver Jyske Bank’s group a criminal organization. Or is the customer just stupid and idiotic. There are clearly some who are lying to the courts. Is it Jyske Bank’s group or is it the customer. + 11-09-2019 Management responsibility, Board responsibility, regarding Jyske Bank’s continued fraud, by using false against Jyske Bank’s customer, you know, after all, in Jyske Bank Group Excellent that Jyske Bank exposes us to fraud, why does the Bank refuse to stop the bank’s fraud, you should come along and admit, or at least talk to us, and help us to investigate if there are just minor misunderstandings. This is a call, there aren’t any who will help us at all.
The largest parties in the Danish Parliament – Social Democracy, Left, Conservative. – Have everyone before the election on June 5, 2019 received a copy of the case evidence against, the state aid Jyske Bank’s fraud group, and the Board of Directors’ notice of the bank’s continued fraud against the customer. – To date, on March 3, 2020, have none of the Danish political parties wanted to respond or interfere in Jyske Bank’s way of exposing the bank’s customers to exploitation and gross fraud. – In Denmark, the people are outside, while banks can make fraud and fake without, large law firms can help banks cover Danish banks’ fraud crimes. – For example by lying in court, or just taking a return commission and then fail to present their client’s fraud allegations against the Danish banks, such as Jyske Bank A/S.
IT IS POLITICALLY DECIDED, THAT THE DANISH STATE’S SUPPORTED BANKS MUST NOT BE INVESTIGATED FOR ECONOMIC CRIMINALITY.
ER DET POLITISK BESLUTTET, AT DANSKE STATS STØTTEDE BANKER IKKE MÅ BLIVE EFTERFORSKET FOR ØKONOMISK KRIMINALITET.
The Danish Parliament has received information that the Danish bank, which the government has previously granted state aid, is now exposing customers to fraud and fraud Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Adm. direktør, Gazprom Energy, fhv. koncerndirektør, Dong Energy, fhv. afdelingschef i Finansministeriet og adm. direktør i Økonomiforvaltningen, Københavns Kommune – Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Næstformand næstformand i Jyske Banks bestyrelse. Kurt Bligaard Pedersen står til at overtage formandsposten i Jyske Bank A/S efter Sven Buhrkal Dermed får Jyske bank A/S en ny formand, som også har siddet centralt placeret i det politiske system, blandt andet som rådgiver for, Socialdemokratiet (S). – 🙂 Vice Chairman of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. Kurt Bligaard Pedersen to take over the chairmanship of Jyske Bank A/S after Sven Buhrkal Thus, Jyske bank gets a new chairman, who has also been centrally located in the political system, including as adviser to the Social Democracy (S). / Jyske Bank’s entire board Koncernbestyrelsen Sven Buhrkall Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Rina Asmussen Philip Baruch Jens A. Borup Anker Laden-Andersen Keld Norup Per Schnack Christina Lykke Munk Johnny Christensen Marianne Lillevang Koncerndirektionen Anders Dam Niels Erik Jakobsen Per Skovhus Peter Schleidt Knows that the bank’s customer just wants a dialogue with Jyske Bank’s group. No one can doubt how funny Jyske Bank’s board of directors thought this is. While the bank’s board member Philip Baruch has repeatedly provided detailed fake and false information to the court Whether it was too funny, or deliberate to present untrue information to the courts, to disappoint in legal matters. whether Jyske Bank has used bribery of Lundgren’s lawyers, not to submit their client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank. We just ask Jyske Bank’s board about putting ourselves together as adult people, and in all, looking at our case in the timeline that our new lawyer has to present. Is Jyske Bank’s foundation rooted. Driver Jyske Bank’s group a criminal organization. Or is the customer just stupid and idiotic. There are clearly some who are lying to the courts. Is it Jyske Bank’s group or is it the customer. + 11-09-2019 Management responsibility, Board responsibility, regarding Jyske Bank’s continued fraud, by using false against Jyske Bank’s customer, you know, after all, in Jyske Bank Group Excellent that Jyske Bank exposes us to fraud, why does the Bank refuse to stop the bank’s fraud, you should come along and admit, or at least talk to us, and help us to investigate if there are just minor misunderstandings. This is a call, there aren’t any who will help us at all.
2019 jyske bank bedrager kunde og nægter at tale med offeret This advertising car for Jyske Bank A / S, Anders Dam, Lund Elmer Sandager, Philip Baruch, and now also for several people involved. Lundgrens Parner Dan Terkildsens has seen the car in Hornbæk several times, where Dan Terkildsen himself has a cottage, Dan thought it was a good way to bring the matter to the attention, and also said on 13 August 2019 that he took off the hat for the client’s cars. Jyske Bank’s group has known to the car since November 2016 where a customer of Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade 9. sends a picture to Jyske Bank and asks if Barsk Thomsen still houses in the department. Jyske Bank replied that the bank was solving the problem, which the customer knows nothing about, as Jyske Bank’s group still has not wanted to stop the bank’s continued fraudulent transactions, and still refuses dialogue, while the group’s board of directors is all behind Jyske Bank’s continuing fraud. Which must be to the detriment of the customer as much as possible.
Spørgsmål der kunne være blevet afklaret med dialog mellem parterne Jyske Bank A/S og Storbjerg Erhverv.
Jyske Banks nye bestyrelses formand Kurt Bligaard Pedersen. Vil sikkert styrke Jyske Banks magt og kontakter til de politiske venner, Kurt Bilgaard Pedersen der kan skrive Socialdemokratisk rådgiver på sit CV Og med en fortid som afdelingschef i Finansministeriet og administrerende direktør i Økonomiforvaltningen i Københavns Kommune, styrker det Jyske Banks magtfulde position i samfundet. – THE QUESTION Is the political decided to COVER OF JYSKE BANK’S MANAGEMENT In order to hide their involvement in the bank’s continued fraud and fraud against the bank’s customer. Jyske Bank now also has the political backing to make and continue to fraud against the bank’s customers. It may not be a coincidence that Lundgren’s Partner Company has not presented a customer’s complaint against Jyske Bank’s group.
MEN DET NÆGTER JYSKE BANK, ALTSÅ DIALOG.
20-09-2018. Jyske Banks bande leder Anders Dam Nægter at svare på kundes anklager mod jyske bank for dokumentfalsk og bedrageri. På dette tidspunkt er Jyske Banks koncern ikke af hverken Rødstenen advokater Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, eller af Lundgrens advokater ved partner Dan Terkildsen, blevet fremlagt kundens påstande om at SWAPPEN Bilag 1 er falsk, og at Jyske Bank laver svig Men det er altså det som kunden selv har fremlagt 28-10-2019. Delt længere nede
Stadsadvokaten siger.
At kunderne selv må fremlægge sager mod Jyske Banks svig forhold i civil retten.
NÅR ADVOKATER SOM LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER, EFTERFØLGENDE, DE ER BLEVET HYRET TIL AT FØRE SVIG SAGER IMOD JYSKE BANK
SÅ EFTERFØLGENDE ER BLEVET KØBT OG BETALT AF SELV SAMME JYSKE BANK A/S
TIL AT ARBEJDE FOR JYSKE BANK A/S.
Anders Christian Dam anklages af kunde for at være Manden bag bestyrelsens, og Jyske Banks fortatte svigforretninger imod kunde. Anders Christian Dam is accused by customer for being The man behind the Board of Directors, and Jyske Bank, continued fraudulent transactions against customers.
DET HAR VÆRET YDERST TVIVLSOMT OM LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER HAR VILLE FREMLÆGGE KUNDES BEVISER MOD JYSKE BANK FOR
MANDAT SVIG, DOKUMENTFALSK, BEDRAGERI, UDNYTTELSE.
NÅR JYSKE BANKS LEDELSE SAMTIDS BETALER LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER MILLIONER AF KRONER.
Har du ikke prøvet et korrupt advokat firma så prøv dem vi har været i kløerne på, og bedøm selv, om der bare er tale om konspirationsteorier.
Til dig som lige falder over opslaget her, og tænker Lundgrens er da ikke korrupte , og så tænker Jyske bank er da ikke kriminelle, jo desværre er Jyske Bank kriminelle, og Jyske Banks Koncern har betalt Lundgrens advokater retur kommision.
Vi kalder det for retur kommision At Lundgrens advokater få en sådan opgave. I sadelshed når Lundgrens advokater ikke efterfølgende, fremlægger nogle af deres klients påstande mod Jyske Bank i domstolen.
At den konservative Advokat Dan Terkildsen fra Lundgrens advokat partner selskab. Ikke ville Fremlægge klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S Kan kun skyldes at Jyske Bank har betalt Lundgrens advokater for ikke at fremlægge deres klients SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S I en sag hvor de politiske partier som syntes ved Socialdemokrat, Venstre, konservative folkeparti . At have dybe relationer til Jyske Bank og Bankens Bestyrelse. / Efter at Nykredit har nægtet at svare på spørgsmål som om vi har lånt 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit, og derefter så omlagt dette påstået lån til et andet lån i Nykredit. FORTSÆTTER / NYKREDIT der har været hoved aktionærer i Jyske Bank A/S med over 10 % ejerskab. Hvis iøvrigt tidligere administrerede Koncern direktør Bente Overgaard der i 2020 indtræder i Jyske Banks bestyrelse. + + De 2 nye placeringer i Jyske Banks bestyrelse Bente Overgaard arbejder nu som programdirektør på CBS. Bente Overgaard er i øjeblikket en del af en række bestyrelser, heriblandt i Finansiel Stabilitet, SP Group og Johannes Fogs Fond. / Dernæst trækker formanden sig fra Jyske Banks bestyrelse. Det tidligere folketingsmedlem af Venstre Sven Buhrkall trækker sig som formand for bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank. Sven Buhrkall (født 18. april 1949 i Agerskov ) er en dansk virksomhedsrådgiver og politiker . Han er medlem af partiet Venstre og var folketingsmedlem for Sønderjyllands Amtskreds 20. november 2001 – 8. februar 2005. Sven Buhrkall Bliver erstattet af Kurt Bligaard Pedersen der også er topchef i den britiske afdeling af den russiske energikoncern Gazprom Adm. direktør, Gazprom Energy, fhv. koncerndirektør, Dong Energy, fhv. afdelingschef i Finansministeriet og adm. direktør i Økonomiforvaltningen, Københavns Kommune. + Der er tale om sadeles magtfulde personer i Jyske Banks bestyrelse. Så når Jyske Bank A/S så laver svig Og det er bevidst svig Og Jyske Banks bestyrelse er i Ond tro når Bestyrelses i Jyske Bank A/S udemærket godt ved, at alle bankens bestyrelses medlemmer sammen i forening støtter Koncerns kriminelle aktiviteter mod bankens kunde fortsættes. Så virker det som om det er politisk besluttet at DÆKKE OVER JYSKE BANKS VÆRDIER MÅ VÆRE AT LAVE OG FORTSÆTTE BANKENS BEDRAGERI. SPØRGSMÅLET ER HVEM DER STÅR BAG BESLUTNINGEN SOM AT JYSKE BANK A/S MÅ IKKE AF POLITIET EFTERFORSKES FOR SVIG / BEDRAGERI / MANDATSVIG / DOKUMENTFALSK ELLER ANDRE FORBRYDELSER. SÅ SLEMT STÅR DET TIL MED KAMMERATERI OG DE MAGTFULDE DÆKKER OVER ANDRE MAGTFULDE, FOR SELV AT BLIVE MERE MAGTFULD TIL SKADE FOR DANMARKS GRUNDLOV OG VÆRDIER. + + FORTSAT: Eftersom Nykredit nægter at svare på om vi har lånt 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit. Stævner vi Nykredit Bank for at få svar. NYKREDIT,S advokat Mette Egholm Nielsen svare først 1 uge efter det var lykkedes for os at få afholdt et møde med Nykredit Bilag 28. Af 18-10-2016 se Bilagene her. 19 maj 2016 tilbydes Anders Christian Dam og Bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank A/S At vi gerne vil betale Jyske Bank et gebyr på 50.000 DKK for at bevise vi har lånt de 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit Bank, som Jyske Bank i retsforhold har påstået optaget og omlagt, se Bilag 28. 30. Og Bilag Y. Samt D. Vi hæver beløbet til 250.000 DKK Men Bestyrelsen nægter stadig kunde dialog. Bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank A/S Med den ordstyrerende formand CEO Anders Christian Dam Finanstilsynet, Justitsministeriet, folketinget og Finansministeriet kender alle til Jyske Banks koncernens svig forbrydelser mod kunde. Men det må være politisk besluttet at sådanne forbrydelser, må danskerne ikke få politiets hjælp til at stoppe. DERFOR ER DET PALLE ALENE MOD JYSKE BANK A/S Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem Anker Laden-Andersen 2019 Per Schnack 2019 Sven Buhrkall 2019 Kurt Bligaard Pedersen 2019 Rina Asmussen 2019 Philip Baruch 2019 Jens A Borup 2019 Keld Norup 2019 Christina Lykke Munk 2019 Haggai Kunisch 2018 Johnny Christensen 2019 Marianne Lillevang 2019 Anders Dam 2019 Leif F Larsen 2018 Niels Erik Jakobsen 2019 Per Skovhus 2019 Peter Schleidt 2019 Bente Overgaard 2020 nyt medlem Is Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors at odds with the law, or is the Board of Directors directly contributing to Jyske Bank exposing its customers to deliberate fraud. The question that the Danish state and the parliament should address, but seems to ignore completely The Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Finance are aware of the Jyske Bank Group’s fraud, but apparently doesn’t matter.
Morten Ulrik Gade wrote in 2015 17th of November. that dialogue was a good idea but only until we discovered the scam by 2016, the bank did not want to talk to us anymore.
Opslag er bare for at få et møde med Jyske Banks Koncern, og allerhelst med CEO Anders Christian Dam.
Således vi kan undgå fremtidige misforståelser.
Derfor stiller vi spørgsmål, som disse til organisation Danmarks anden største bank.
SPØRGSMÅL. Laver jyske Bank A/S SVIG
SPØRGSMÅL. Lyver Jyske Banks Koncernen, eller omformer har nogle i Jyske Bank i februar 2010. skrevet til jeres kunde at de har lånt 4.328.000 DKK i Nykredit. (Bilag 30.)
SPØRGSMÅL. Har nogle i Jyske Bank i januar 2012. Skrevet til jeres kunde, at de har omlagt (Lavet det bagvedliggende lån om. Iøvrigt Bilag D.)
SPØRGSMÅL. Har Jyske Bank’s ansatte 6. Maj 2009 modtage brev, med et tilbud fra Nykredit, hvori der tydeligt står (Bilag AG.). At tidligere tilbud (Bilag Y.) og pantebrev er bortfaldet. Og er det et tilbud på 4.328.000 fra Nykredit der henvises til.
At politiet og Statsadvokaten vælger at beskytte Jyske Bank imod efterforskning for groft bedrageri mod bankens kunder, er meget underligt. Hvilken kontakter har Jyske Banks venner til staten som skulle beskytte danskerne mod kriminelle. . Jyske Banks bestyrelse må have indgået en eller anden form for aftale med staten, Justitsministeriet eller anden stats magt at Jyske Bank godt kan udsætte kunder for bevidst svig. Sådan virker det ihvertfald Lundgrens advokater er lige til at indberette for advokat nævnet 24-02-2020 Her er 2 indbetalinger som Lundgrens bogholderi først ikke kunde finde, og derfor har rykket deres klient. Når en bogholder i Lundgrens ikke engang kan finde ud af at bogføre en betaling på rette klint Så er der vel også rod i regnskabet og i sagerne hos Lundgrens advokater. ELLER HVILKEN UNDSKYLDNING VIL LUNDGRENS ADVOKATPARTNERSELSKAB ELLERS KOMME MED. SPØRGSMÅLET ER TIL DISSE MEDLEMMER AF LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director For der står vel heller ikke noget om, nogle steder at sagen imod Jyske Banks handler om Svig vel ? 🙂 Lundgrens advokater må være sadeles korrupte. Siden Lundgrens valgte at føre en anden sag mod Jyske Bank A/S end den vi har skrevet kontinuerligt skulle fremlægges. DANSK ER OGSÅ SVÆRT AT FORSTÅ FOR LUNDGRENS DER HAR MANGE MAGTFULDE KUNDER UD OVER JYSKE BANK A/S At Lundgrens skulle fremlægges svig og falsk påstande imod Jyske Bank A/S for retten. DET VAR FOR SVÆRT FOR LUNDGRENS AT ARBEJDE I EN STOR MILLION SAG IMOD JYSKE BANK A/S
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark Where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
SPØRGSMÅL. Har Jyske Banks bestyrelses medlem Philip Baruch i sagn mod Jyske Bank, fremlagt usande oplysninger overfor domstolene.
SPØRGSMÅL. Har Jyske Banks Koncern ledelse, og advokater mindst siden maj måned 2016. Haft kendskab til kundes mistanke om at i Jyske Bank A/S være udsat for et kæmpe Bedrageri.
Hvis Jyske Banks Koncern ledelse er med til at Jyske Banks svigforretninger, mod bankens kunder fortsættes, har bestyrelsen så ikke et ansvar ?.
FOR JYSKE BANK A/S SNART VIL HOLDE OP MED AT STØTTE JYSKE BANKS BEDRAGERI MOD LILLE VIRKSOMHED.
Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens advokater partner selskab.
LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER sagde 13 august 2019. ved Dan Terkildsen at Jyske Banks bestyrelsen ikke har noget ansvar, for hvad Jyske Bank A/S har lavet / laver. Dan Terkildsen undlod at bruge ordet Svig selv om Klienten gentagne gange siger det er svig, og Bilag 1. Er falsk.
Dan Terkildsen stå i midten Her på Lundgrens nye kontor i Tuborg Havn Dan Terkildsen standing in the middle Here at Lundgren’s new office in Tuborg Harbor
Dan Terkildsen du er naturligvis velkommen til at komme med en kommentar.
Og svare her, hvorfor du Dan Terkildsen, ikke har svaret på de instrukser, Lundgrens advokater kontinuerligt har fået fra jeres egen klient.
Instrukser om at Lundgrens skulle fremlægge jeres klients sag som svig.
Og med de påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S, som gentagne er overbagt til Lundgrens advokat partner selskab.
Partner Dan Terkildsen du kan Svare her +4522227713 så deler vi gerne det du siger, og har Lundgrens advokater nogle rettelser så klare vi også det.
SPØRGSMÅL. Har Jyske Banks Koncern ledelse ved Anders Christian Dam, lavet en aftale med Lundgrens advokat partner selskab om at de involverede på kontoret.
Lundgrens advokat partner selskab
Som mindst disse på Lundgrens har kenskab til
neither.
Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director
Or some others in Lundgren’s law firm, never intended to submit, the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S
Ja selv bogholderiet Ved hvad klientens påstande er. Påstande som ingen i Lundgrens advokat partner selskab har ville fremlægge. Eller ikke må fremlægge for Jyske Bank A/S Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S Står ellers tydeligt i alle breve til Lundgrens. 🙁 Den tidligere klient i Lundgrens advokater Mistænker At Lundgrens Partner Selskab, af ledelsen i Jyske Bank A/S er blevet betalt. For ikke at fremlægge deres klients SVIG & FALSK påstande mod Jyske Bank.
SPØRGSMÅL. Altså har Jyske Banks Koncern ledelse ved CEO Anders Christian Dam. Lavet en aftale med LEDELSEN I LUNDGRENS advokat partner selskab, om ikke at fremlægge deres klients SVIG påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
HVORFOR NÆGTER JYSKE BANKS ØVERSTE LEDER AT SVARE KUNDE. OG LADER JYSKE BANK A/S FORTSÆTTE BANKENS SVIG FORRETNINGER WHY THE JYSKE BANK’S TOP LEADER REFUSES TO ANSWER CUSTOMER. AND LET’S JYSKE BANK A / S CONTINUE BANK’S FRAUD BUSINESS
Hvis du mener vi har glemt noget eller skrevet noget forkert, ring på +4522227713.
Også hvis Lundgrens advokater slet ikke er blevet bestukket af Koncern ledelse i Jyske Bank A/S, ved Anders Christian Dam Så vi kan få den mindre misforståelse rettet.
Vi ønsker kun dialog, hvilket vi bliver nægtet, derfor finder du disse sjove og morsomme opslag om Jyske Bank A/S.
Ja ja her er fyldt med stave fejl, og har flere steder skrevet Birgit Buch Thuesen med Bush. men nu er de jo også bare en dagbog om vores historie.
Retsplejelovens § 126, stk. 1.
Her er bilagene der stiller store spørgsmålstegn ved Om Lundgrens advokat partner selskab har hjulpet Jyske Bank mod deres egen klient Derfor beder vi om at få hjælp, Kære Henrik Høpner 04-09-2019 prøv at hjælpe os med at finde ud af om vi er udsat for bedrageri, eller vi er dumme som i DUM DUMMERE og DUMMEST Men hvem ønsker at have hæderlige banker. De er svære at finde. Nu handler det om Lundgrens partnerselskab hvori Dan Terkildsen er Partner. Og om lundgrens forbindelser til Jyske bank A/S som synes at være en god forretning. Hvad Lundgrens så har givet Jyske Bank til modydelse, hvis der ikke ligefrem er at ville møde op i retten uden at have fremlagt vores påstande, for så at tabe. Ja så ved vi ikke hvad ellers det kan være. Spørg Lundgrens bestyrelse hvorfor de ikke fremlage vores påstande som de er blevet ansat til. Om Dan Terkildsen er mod alt hvad Konservative måtte stå for. ? Dan Terkildsen har for Lundgrens Direkte modarbejdet klients retssikkerhed. Når Lundgrens kæmper imod deres klients sag kommer for retten. Kæmper Lundgrens advokater realt i mod retssikkerheden. DEN UAFHÆNGIGE STATSMAGT Ved ikke at ville fremlægge klienten sag for domstolen. Er det sådanne medlemmer Konservative ønsker. Alle medlemmer af de konservative se her hvordan Dan Terkildsen modarbejder retssikkerheden i at ske fyldest. ved tilsyneladende at varetage modparten Her Jyske banks interesser Dan Terkildsen er tæt knyttet til toppen i konservative, hvor vi formoder at Dan Terkildsen har haft politisk indflydelse, på den konservative politiske holdning til landes love. Jyske Banks Koncernchef og Bestyrelse. Er i åben krig med lille bank kunde. Som påstår at Jyske bank A/S står bag million bedrageri Hvilket kunden selv må fremlægge for domstolen 28-10-2019 Efter som Lundgren advokatpartnerselskab sammen har valgt Direkte at modarbejde klienten, for i stedet at hjælpe Danmarks næststørste bank, Jyske bank i at kunne fortsætte svigforeting mod bankens kunde. – CEO Anders Dam står fast, Jyske Banks kunde skal i tyve år, betale 5,32 %, i renter af 4.328.000 DKK Ved en rente swap, på 4.328.000 DKK som Jyske Banks ansatte i afdelingen på Vesterbrogade har lavet 16-07-2008 Og det uden at der 16-07-2008 er nogle aftale med kunden. En falsk SWAP på 4.328.000 kr. der har en værdi på mindst 2.500.000 dkk for Jyske bank. og som bliver et tab for kunden, kaldes lovmæssig for bedrageri. Jyske banks direktion er ligeglade. Da Jyske Bank har et stort politisk netværk, gennem bankens bestyrelse og deres kontakter. Som Jyske Banks medarbejdere, i et årti usandt har fortalt kunden At er den Swap, der er lavet 15-07-2008. Til det lån på 4.328.000 DKK som Jyske Banks mange advokater og ansatte har påstået deres kunde skulle have hjemtaget. Og senere så omlagt. Alt dette mens kunden har ligget syg efter en hjerneblødning. Lundgrens skulle fremlægge de originale syge papir fra fra Hillerød sygehus Dette ville Lundgrens ikke. Lundgrens ville slet ikke fremlægge kundens påstande. Mette-Marie ringer sent 18-12-2018 Og siger der er nogle grove beskyldninger vi kommer med, imod Jyske Bank A/S Hvortil vi siger men det er jo fakta. Lundgrens fremlægger ingen af vores påstande, og arbejder som de selv vil uden om klientens. Kan sige at Lundgrens fører en sag, som ikke er den sag Lundgrens er blevet antaget til. Hvilket Lundgrens vil have 185.000 dkk for. Lundgrens har nægtet at tilbagebetale de penge vi har overført, som Dan Terkildsen skriver, så har Lundgrens lavet et stort stykke arbejde. Noget som klienten ikke kan få øje på. Vi har heldigvis taget billeder med telefon, af sygejournal, på Lundgrens kontor før Mette Marie Nielsen fik dem, før 18-12-2018 Med klare INSTRUKSER på at fremlægge alt den 18-12-2018 Lundgrens advokater Mette-Marie Nielsen Påstår nu telefonske 18-12-2018 kl 17-18 at det kan skade vores sag, at fremlægge bevis for at kunden i perioden 2009-2015 led af hukommelses besvær. Vi har derfor måtte fremlægge disse bilag i ringe kvalitet, da Lundgrens advokater ikke har afleveret vores bilag retur, som vi bad Dan Terkildsen om, i det samme brev hvor vi fryer Lundgrens advokater, efter mistanke om at være blevet bestukket. Efterfølgende siger Dan Terkildsen 13-08-2019 at vi måske godt kan bruge sygehusjournaler Dan Terkildsen der er meget manipulerende, føler han ville vildlede os til at stole på ham. Dan der ikke vil gentage vores påstande, siger han er ikke en papegøje. Og siger han vil komme med de nasti ting i Viborg, uden dog på mødet 13-08 at sige hvad de nasty ting var. Altså Lundgrens ved Partner Dan Terkildsen Ved måske ikke at man ikke kan komme med noget i en sag, hvis det ikke først er er fremlagt. Men det er jo som vi tror retsplejeloven er. Dan Terkildsen må jo vide hvad han gør. Vi føler dog at Dan Terkildsen modarbejdede at vores sag overhovedet bliver fremlagt. Om Lundgrens og Dan Terkildsen er blevet bestukket til ikke at fremlægge vores sag. Det er jo et job for bagmandspolitiet at finde ud af. De kunne jo undersøge Jyske Banks topledelse og Ledelsen i Lundgrens Og gerne spørge os på 004522227713 Kapitel 2 Politiets opgaver § 2. Politiet har til opgave 1) at forebygge strafbare forhold 3) at bringe strafbar virksomhed til ophør samt efterforske og forfølge strafbare forhold Men vi har jo også opdaget at Lundgrens var gået i seng med Jyske Bank A/S kort efter vi har antaget Lundgrens. med i seng mener vi at Lundgrens vælger at arbejde for Jyske bank A/S
Kunden som bare ønsker at tale med Jyske Bank A/S kan ikke komme i dialog med banken, uanset hvilket morsomme forsøg de gør, Dan Terkildsen har også sagt det er skide godt gået.
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
Har du også undret dig hvorfor disse jyske bank biler kører rundt. spørg bare på 22227713 eller jyske bank på 89898989 Have you also wondered why these Jyske bank cars are driving around. just ask on 22227713 or Jutland Bank on 89898989
Men i en sag for svig, handler det om hvad man kan bevise i retten, og hvad ens påstande er.
Lundgrens fremlagde ingen af Klientens påstande.
HVORFOR MON
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. Lundgrens advokater er mere end velkommen til at svare på vores spørgsmål 1-14 De er lidt nede på siden her 07-02-2020 Link 8. Interessekonflikter Lundgrens 8.1 8.1 Lundgrens kontrollerer straks efter modtagelsen af et opdrag – og inden arbejdet med dette iværksættes – om Lundgrens’ engagement giver anledning til interessekonflikter, der afskærer Lundgrens fra at repræsentere klienten i relation til det pågældende opdrag. Relevante forhold drøftes med klienten, inden sagsbehandlingen påbegyndes. More in English under the Danish text. / Hvis en advokat modarbejder deres klient. Som det her i sagen er sket. Og det også er forsøgt skjult, frem til Klienten selv opdager modstridende interesse konflikter. Mellem Lundgrens Partner Selskab og deres klient Jyske Bank A/S nok april 2018 Lundgrens må gerne selv skrive den rigtige dato og hvem fra ledelsen i Jyske Bank der har givet Lundgrens advokater denne her million opgave til Ring sms +4522227713 så retter vi det. Samt Mellem Lundgrens advokater og Storbjerg Erhverv i sagen mod Jyske Bank A/S for svig ? / Hvor Lundgrens advokater i vores svig sag mod Jyske Bank A/S Dirækte imod “Lundgrens klient” vores instrukser, væger at ingurer vores “klientens” svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S bliver fremlagt for domstolene. Og når Lundgrens kontinuerligt, gør det direkte modsatte af, hvad klienten skriver og siger til Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie og Emil fra Lundgrens advokater. Så ved Partner Dan Terkildsen 100 % godt at Lundgrens Partner Selskab, skal fremlægge deres klients svig påstande imod Jyske Bank A/S. Men alligevel vælger Lundgrens Partner, dirækte imod kundens instrukser, ikke at fremlægge nogle af klientens svig og falsk påstande imod Jyske Banks bestyrelse, og Jyske Bank A/S. Hvad kaldes sådan en advokat virksomhed som Lundgrens så ? Dårlig, Rådden eller bare korrupt. ? / Lundgrens advokater er mere end velkommen til at svare på vores spørgsmål 1-14 De er lidt nede på siden her 07-02-2020 Link er øverst oppe / Som vi klienten har skrevet kontinuerligt, at Lundgrens skulle fremlægge vores sag mod Jyske Bank A/S som svig. Eller har vi noget sted, i alle de dokumenter, vi kontinuerligt har overbragt til Lundgrens advokater, eller måske telefonisk, glemt at bede Lundgrens fremlægge vores sag mod Jyske Bank A/S som svig og falsk. Man kunne jo tro det ikke er skrevet noget sted, siden Lundgrens ikke har fremlagt retten vores påstande. Kan du fortælle hvorfor ? / Hvad er det vi beder Lundgrens advokater om at fremlægge mod Jyske Bank A/S Hvis noget af det vi har skrevet til Lundgrens, og bet Lundgrens Fremlægde kan misforstås, så er det utroligt Lundgrens advokater ikke har stillet et enste spørgsmål. Vi kun kun mundtlig fra 18-12-2018 Hvor Mette-Marie ringer kl. Ca. 17.00 Og siger at det er nogle grove anklager mod Jyske Bank A/S Mette-Marie siger at Dan Terkildsen er i partner møde og skal godkende det Mette-Marie vil skrive til retten samme aften. “Altså Lundgrens advokater kender og har fået vores påstande mod Jyske bank A/S.” Lundgrens vælger selv dirækte imod kundens instrukser, ikke at fremlægge nogle af klientens påstande. / Vi har det også kun fra Emil At Lundgrens ved og har forstået Hvilket 9 vidner vi ønsker at indkalde Lundgrens ved Emil vælger Det er Dan Terkildsen der står bag og bestemmer hvad Emil skal, da Emil er under oplæring. Så når Dan Terkildsen kun, vil have at Emil skrive 2 af disse vidner på 02-09-2019 Iøvrigt de 2 som Jyske Bank selv har bet om, ca. 6 måneder tidligere. (Ved vi først efter Lundgrens er blevet fyret) / Emil har for Lundgrens Advokater også telefonisk, bekræftet at han godt har forstået at sagn handler om svig. Alligevel fremlægger Lundgrens “Emil” den 2 september 2019 intet af det vi gentagne gange har skrevet. Lundgrens advokater har således fjernet 7 vidner, fra Klientens vidne liste, uden Klientens vidne. / Lundgrens fremlægger selv 2. september 2019 et svarkrift. Uden at have medtaget klients påstande. Når Klienten, også har skrivet til Lundgrens og sender en sms til Emil, hvor Lundgrens advokater får klare instrukser om at, Lundgrens intet må fremlægge, uden klienten har godkendt det. Og Lundgrens advokater så alligevel, dirækte i mod Klientens instrukser, fremlægger Lundgrens påstande 2 september 2019. Uden at sende Klienten en kopi. Uden at få Klientens godkendelse. Uden at medtage Klientens svig og falsk påstande. Og dirækte imod det Klienten gentagne gange har skrevet og sagt til Lundgrens advokater. Som at Bilag 1. Swappen på 4.328.000 dkk fra 16-07-2008 er falsk. / Alligevel fremlægger Lundgrens advokater noget andet overfor retten. Og skriver 02-09-2019 At kunden har indgået denne her Swap med Jyske Bank 16-07-2008. / Helt ærligt selv om Klienten er ordblind og ret dårlig til at skrive. Så må Lundgrens advokater være i ond tro, og sikkert også blevet købt af Jyske Bank, for ikke at fremlægge nogle af de svig påstande mod Jyske Bank vi gentagne gange har skrevet / Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens, mener vel ikke at Lundgrens advokater er korrupte. Og bestemt ikke har taget mod bestikkelse fra Jyske Bank A/S, skjult som returkommission. Tænker at Lundgrens Partner Selskab selv mener, at fordi Lundgrens Partner Selskab, har modtaget et stort million beløb af Jyske Banks bestyrelse. Så er betalingen alene givet for at, Lundgrens skulle rådgive Jyske Banks Koncern, omkring salget af 6 ejendomme for ca. 600.000.000. dkk Og denne million aftale mellem Jyske Bank A/S og Lundgrens Partner Selskab. har intet med at Lundgrens Partner Selskab ikke har fremlagt nogle af vores “Klientens” svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S / Og mon ikke Lundgrens Partner Selskab selv mener, at Jyske Banks million betaling til Lundgrens advokater. Ingen indflydelse har, harft på det, at Lundgrens Partner Selskab, ikke har fremlagt nogle af deres anden klient “vores” svig påstande imod Jyske Banks Koncern og bestyrelsen. / Det at Advokaterne, som her Lundgrens partner selskab, så også arbejder, har arbejdet for modparten Jyske Bank A/S Hvilket Lundgrens advokater har lykkes at holde skjult for deres anden klient, os i over 16 måneder. Er sådan en advokat virksomhed så ikke korrupt. eller HVAD MENER I Dan Terkildsen Lundgrens Anders Christian Dam Jyske Bank Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager / Uanset hvor mange penge Bestyrelsen i Jyske Bank A/S har betalt Lundgrens advokat partner selskab for deres ydelser. Og hvis Lundgrens advokaters sammenarbejde med Jyske Bank A/S Har påvirket Lundgrens dømmekraft i deres arbejde med at fremlægge vores svig sagen imod Jyske Bank A/S Og derfor er vores svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S ikke af Lundgrens advokater blevet fremlagt for retten. Uanset om det er venne tjenester, mellem nogle af Danmarks største banker Jyske Bank og landets største advokatfirmaer Lundgrens. Hvis der ikke er tale om bestikkelse og korruption hvad er det så. Dette sker i Danmark absolutte top af samfundet, og disse advokater “Lundgrens” som skulle sikker at loven bliver overholdt. Og så sikker at der findes retssikkerhed også for de små, når det danske politi ved Statsadvokaten har nægtet at Jyske Bank bliver efterforsket. Statsadvokaten mener ligesom Jyske Banks advokater, Lund Elmer Sandager, som sagsøger flere gange har taget i at have løjet i retsforhold, hvilket retten er oplyst, og nu fremlagt retten 28-10-2019 / Når danskerne bliver udsat for svig, udført af Danmarks største og mest magtfulde virksomheder, og det bliver politianmeldt. Men hverken politiet eller statsadvokaten, vil tale med anmælder, der har fremlagt en mappe med flere beviser mod Jyske Bank A/S for overtrædelse af straffeloven, og blot svare at Politiet ikke mener at Jyske Bank A/S vil blive straffet. Og anmælder så af Staten, statsadvokaten henvises til selv at føre en svig sag mod Jyske Bank. / En sag som nu både Rødstenen advokater i Århus samt Lundgrens advokater København direkte har modarbejdet blev fremlagt for de danske domstole. Hvordan synes i så om retssikkerheden i Danmark. Hvis nogle i Danmark udsatte Jyske Bank for det Jyske Bank koncernen har lavet imod os, så sad de fængsle for længst. Mvh familien Skaarup fra Hornbaek 0045-22227713
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen. Hallo kan Jyske Bank ikke bare tale med os, indrømme svig, så vi kan slippe for dette cirkus Hvorfor udsætter Jyske Banks koncern deres kunder for bevidst svig ?
Remember that we have tried everything since 2016 to enter into dialogue with Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors and the Executive Board, and only to avoid misunderstandings, which Lawyer Morten Ulrik Gade has also understood on November 17, 2015. But if Jyske bank has something the bank wants to hide from the public, it makes sense. Otherwise, we do not understand that such a large and powerful organization, as Jyske Bank’s entire board of directors refuses dialogue, with the customer who has asked management directly since May 2016, and CEO Anders Dam to help investigate whether the customer in Jyske Bank becomes exposed to fraud in even the same Jyske Bank. Is this a case of bank fraud for millions of Danish kroner, which all friends try to cover, or is the customer right. Why won’t the police and the city attorney investigate Jyske Bank for fraud? When authorities refuse to investigate the Danish bank’s continued fraudulent relationship against the bank’s customer, what are the provisions of the Criminal Code? If you can’t understand, the shared documents, maybe you just think we’re crazy and that Jyske Bank has not done nothing wrong, so talk to us. Help us understand why? Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, not even denying the Group, exposes their customer to fraud. We only ask that Jyske Bank’s powerful friends and Jyske Bank’s shareholders ask Anders Christian Dam to enter into a dialogue and help the client to review the case together. If some in Jyske Bank’s powerful organization have made mistakes. Are concessions and an unreserved apology a natural consequence. So dear everyone at Jyske Bank A/S Do you want to talk about this here. The number +4522227713 Is still on the chest of your own T-shirt, similar to Anders Christian Dam Dear all. Remember that Dialog promotes understanding, so talk to your customers, if they have a complaint about Jyske Bank’s fraud against your customers.
Jyske Banks værdier
JYSKE BANK VIL IKKE UNDSKYLDE , FOR NOGET SOM HELST. Lundgren partner siger på et kort møde, at Jyske Bank advokat og Bestyrelses medlem Philip Baruch Har sagt at Jyske Bank kunne strække sig til at gå med til en beklagelse. Hertil svare sagsøger at de vil have en undskyldning og indrømmelser, for det vi har sagt Lundgrens advokater skal fremlægge i svig sagen mod Jyske Bank. Klik på teksten og bliv klogere på hvordan Bestikkelse og Retur kommision virker. Og ikke mindst om bestikkelse er strafbart. Hvis de myndighederne ellers syntes Bedrageri, Dokumentfalsk og Bestikkelse skal stoppes. Skulle anklage myndigheden starte med at undersøge sagen her. Ring gerne til 004522227713 / Side 29 og 30. Grænsen mellem bestikkelse og lovlig modtagelse af gaver og andre fordele i det offentlige, straffe rammen er lidt lavere mellem private The line between bribery and the legitimate acceptance of gifts and other benefits in the public secto IV.D.2. Gerningsindholdet Selve gerningsindholdet i straffelovens § 144 er uberettiget modtagelse, fordring eller tilsigelse af gave eller anden fordel. IV.D.2.1. Modtagelse Den kriminelle handling består i at ”modtage, fordre eller lade sig tilsige” en gave eller anden fordel. Netop derfor er det kun delvist korrekt at kalde § 144 for ”passiv bestikkelse”. Det som er kriminaliseret, kan være en passivitet hvis den pågældende blot modtager en ydelse som bliver tilbudt, eller lader sig tilsige en ydelse. At fordre, at der ydes en gave eller anden fordel, forstås derimod sådan at der ydes noget aktivt fra modtagerens side. Dette kunne eksempelvis være at ytre ønske om, eller ligefrem kræve, at få noget til gengæld for sit arbejde, og derved være primus motor bag lovovertrædelsen. Østre Landsretten har taget stilling til spørgsmålet i forbindelse med afgrænsningen af § 144’s anvendelsesområder. IV.D.2.2. Pligtstridighed Modtagelse af bestikkelse efter straffelovens § 144 er både strafbart hvor der handles pligtstridigt som en følge heraf, og hvor dette ikke er tilfældet, jf. afsnit III.B. ovenfor. Der er dog forskel på strafværdigheden af en pligtstridig og en ikke-pligtstridig handling eller undladelse. Et forhold hvor der ikke er handlet pligtstridigt, anses for klart mindre strafværdig end et forhold hvor gerningspersonen har handlet i strid med sine pligter.70 Dette har sin baggrund helt tilbage i straffeloven af 1866, hvor pligtstridige og ikke-pligtstridige handlinger var afsondret i hver sin strafbestemmelse. Forskellen er også ofte kommet til udtryk i retspraksis, som bekræfter ovenstående påstand. I dom af 14. november 2006 fremgår det således, at retten har vurderet og lagt vægt på dette. Retten anså det for en formildnende omstændighed, at der ikke var begået sagsbehandlingsfejl i sager behandlet af tiltalte og retten lagde til grund for afgørelsen, at tiltalte ikke havde ladet sig påvirke af de modtagne gaver i sin sagsbehandling. I U.1959.1018/2H er det beskrevet mere direkte. Her lægger retten i sin bedømmelse til grund, at tiltalte ikke havde gjort sig skyldig i et pligtstridigt forhold. I U.1985.270Ø er pligtstridighed også berørt og her fremgår, at det i forbindelse med straffeudmålingen er tillagt betydning, at det ikke kan lægges til grund at modtagelserne har givet anledning til et pligtstridigt forhold. I TfK2007.420Ø er det omvendt tillagt strafskærpende betydning, at tiltalte havde handlet pligtstridigt. At Lundgrens så ikke fremlægger klientens påstande for retten, kan kun være fordi Lundgrens har valgt at tage mod retur kommision fra Jyske Banks koncern. Jyske Banks bestyrelse bør læse denne bog. Klik på billedet ovenover og Følg link Det billede med teksten. Kunder i Jyske Bank kan se langt efter en undskyldning, indrømmelser og undskyldninger er ikke en del af Jyske Banks fundament, som benægtelse og udnyttelse er det.
CEO Anders Dam Jyske Bank Anders Dam vil du og resten af bestyrelsen gå hvis koncernen bliver dømt for svig Eller vil i alle klister jer fast i jeres taburetter Anders Dam hvis vi har bare lidt ret Bør du stille dit mandat frit Anders Dam. Sammen med din øvrige bestyrelse.
Hvem i Jyske Banks koncern ledelse fik den geniale ide at bruge det kunden i Jyske Bank siger er bestikkelse / returkommission.
Hvis det ikke var Anders Dam personligt, der fik den gode idé, om at købe Lundgrens advokater, for at Lundgren’s advokater skulle arbejde for Jyske Bank A/S
Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens advokater partner selskab. Klik og bliv klogere på Advokat kurser Et kursus koster knap 4.000 DKK
Således Lundgrens ikke kunne fremlægge vores svig / bedrageri påstande mod Jyske Bank koncernen.
Det er sådan Danmarks banker som Jyske Bank arbejder.
Velkommen til jyske bank Jyske Bank er en anderledes bank. Her vil Bestyrelsen gerne stå sammen om at fortsætte det svig, som kunde mange gange har anmodet bestyrelsen om at holde op med.
Kunde beskylder Jyske Banks koncern for at lave SVIG / Bedrageri, lave FALSK / Dokumentfalsk, Lyve for retten, bruge Retur Kommision eller Bestikkelse for at tjene aktionærernes økonomiske interesser.
Og siger så, at sådan ser det ud, men siger også at en fra bagmandspolitiet, har sagt, at det må være en politisk beslutning, siden politiet ikke vil efterforske Jyske Bank A/S for Bedrageri / Svig, og vi så kan vi ikke gøre noget.
Vi vælger dog alligevel, alene selv at prøve alt for at stoppe Jyske Banks fortsatte bedrageri i mod os.
Mens den samlede bestyrelse og sikkert flere i Jyske Bank griner af kunden, som nægter at opgive mod en organisation som Jyske Bank jo er. Så fortsætter vi med at på en anderledes og mere iøjnefaldende sjov måde at kommunikere med ledelsen i Jyske Banks koncern. Og gør os klar til en fortsat lang krig, for at få stoppet Jyske Banks fortsatte bedrageri mod os. Når nu politiet og Statsadvokaten ikke har ønsket at stoppe forbrydelser mod de danske borgere, i de sager hvor de store danske banker er indblandet.
Dialog er med til at undgå misforståelser, såfremt Jyske Bank A/S og Bestyrelse ikke mener at koncernen står bag million Bedrageri mod kunde, ville samtale fremme forståelsen.
Sendt til CEO Anders Dam Og så sagde han ikke engang tak
Ring nu Anders Dam du fik en trøje med vores telefon nummer, så du kunne huske at ringe hvis du ikke er enige i det som står her i dagbogen.
Philip Baruch ekspert i Bank jura, også ekspert i Ledelses ansvar Philip Baruch er advokat og partner i Lund Elmer sandager. Men er også medlem af Jyske banks bestyrelse hvor Philip Baruch er Advokat. Philip Baruch har i forvejen fremlagt flere usandheder, falsk i retsforhold, for at dække over jyske banks fortsatte svig forbrydelser. Den viden er skræmmende. / Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater ved Philip Baruch viste som en af de første advokater i Jyske Bank at Lundgrens advokater var blevet ansat af sagsøger til at føre kundes svig anklager mod Jyske Bank. Der er derfor nærliggende at tro det er Philip Baruch, Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt var først med Jyske Bank koncernens idé, om at købe modpartens advokat. Lundgrens advokat partner selskab og give Lundgrens et million job, for Jyske Bank . Det ville været naivt, når Jyske Banks koncern så vil sige at dette ikke vil blive et problem for svigsagen Lundgrens skulle have ført imod Jyske Banks koncern.
Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt, må være stolte af sig selv, ved Jyske Bank A/S kunne købe modpartens advokat, Lundgrens advokater, og dermed stoppe en Bedrageri sag imod Jyske Banks koncern.
Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt Var det Jyske Banks koncernen ledelse som fik den gode ide at betale Lundgrens advokater et million beløb, for at hjælpe Jyske Bank. Eftersom Jyske Bank konsekvent lyver, og nægter at give indrømmelser, gætter vi på at Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt, Philip Baruch står bag Jyske Banks million ordre til Lundgrens advokater.
Så vidste Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt, at Lundgrens ikke ville fremlægge, sagen for Jyske Banks kunde, mod Jyske Bank for, svig, falsk og kontinuitet, svigagtig optræde mod Jyske Banks kunde.
Bribery is not only a problem of Danish society.
Har du mistanke om råd i fundament, så undersøg det og bliv klogere på hvordan du finder rådenskab, Jyske Banks oplyste fundament er langt fra virkeligheden, og de værdier Jyske Banks fundament i virkeligheden hviler på.
Det er som regel Anders Christian Dam og Niels Erik Jakobsen der stiller sig op på tv, og for Jyske Banks koncern udtaler om enhver anklage mod Jyske Bank.
Om det er hvidvaskning, hjælp til skatte undragelse eller andet Niels Erik Jakobsen eller andre i Jyske Bank giver aldrig indrømmelser, og benægter alt.
Niels Erik Jakobsen benægter Jyske Banks rådgivning til skatteunddragelse Niels Erik Jakobsen denies Jyske Bank’s advice on tax evasion Regardless of whether DR on TV has shown how Jyske Bank’s employees advise to avoid paying Tax in Denmark, Jyske Bank’s board of directors denies.
Uanset om DR på TV har vist hvordan Jyske Banks ansatte rådgiver til at undgå at betale Skat i Danmark, benægter Jyske Banks bestyrelse.
En artikel som er sigende for Jyske Banks koncern.
Flere advokater har sagt til sagsøger.
At når Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, ikke har tilbage betalt det overførte honorar, som Dan Terkildsen har nægtet at returnere.
Skal Lundgrens advokat partner selskab indberettes til Advokat nævnet, for overtrædelse af god advokat skik.
Og vi skal med sende alle breve, sms, mails.
Hvori Lundgrens får meget klare instruks, på at fremlægge klients svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S.
Optagelser af samtaler, skal ligeledes afleveres til advokat nævnet / samfundet, hvori Lundgrens ansatte meget klart modtager instrukser, om at sagen mod Jyske Bank A/S skal fremlægges som en svig og falsk sag.
Hvilket Emil fra Lundgrens da også telefonisk har bekræftet, men Ingen fra Lundgrens svare altså på andet, hverken, sms, breve eller mails.
Hvorfor det må stå enhver klart, at Lundgrens advokater må have planlagt, ikke at fremlægge noget af det, deres klient giver til, Mette-Marie, Emil, Dan Terkildsen fra Lundgrens, meget klare instrukser om at fremlægge.
Dear partner of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company. Remember now. A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. If you choose Lundgren’s lawyers to work for you. Then be careful Lundgrens does also choose to work for the opposing part like here Jyske Bank. And is habil. In our fraud and falde case against Jyske Bank A/S 🏦. Then Lundgrens chose to accept a million jobs, offered by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, just a few months after, Lundgrens took the assignment against Jyske Bank for fraud and false. We fired Lundgrens 1 year after, when we discovered that Lundgren’s Partner Company real works for Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. And therefore directly in contravention of good lawyer custom, counteract us, and that our claims against Jyske Bank were not presented to the courts. Therefore, we would like to warn you as a client in Lundgrens, as we believe they have received a return commission from Jyske Bank A/S, to help Jyske Bank A/S A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. Click link and read more. If a lawyer counteracts their client as here in the case. Where Lundgren’s attorneys in our fraud case against Jyske Bank A / S directly against “Lundgren’s client” our instructions, we dare to submit our “client’s” claims. And when Lundgrens does the exact opposite of what the client writes Lundgren’s attorneys must do. What, then, is such a law firm called? And if the lawyers like Lundgren’s partner company like this, then also work for the counterparty, which Lundgren’s lawyers have managed to keep hidden from us for over 16 months. Is such a law firm so not corrupt. No matter how much money The board of Jyske Bank A / S has paid Lundgren’s lawyer partner company for their services. And if Lundgren’s lawyers’ cooperation with Jyske Bank has affected Lundgren’s work, in the fraud case against Jyske Bank which was therefore not presented to the court. Whether it is friendly services, between some of Denmark’s largest banks Jyske Bank and the country’s largest law firms Lundgrens. If there is no bribery and corruption then what is it? This happens in Denmark absolute top of society, and these lawyers “Lundgrens” who should ensure that the law is complied with. And so sure that there is legal certainty for the little ones when the Danish police by the Attorney General have denied that Jyske Bank is being investigated. The State Attorney thinks, just like Jyske Bank’s lawyers, Lund Elmer Sandager, who has repeatedly pleaded guilty to lying in legal matters. When the Danes are exposed to fraud, carried out by Denmark’s largest and most powerful companies, and it is reported to the police. But neither the police nor the public prosecutor will speak to the prosecutor who has presented a directory with more evidence of violation of the Criminal Code, and simply reply that the Police do not believe that Jyske Bank A / S will be punished. And then, by the State, the State Attorney is referred to bring a fraud case against Jyske Bank himself. And as now both Rødstenen’s lawyers in Aarhus and Lundgren’s lawyers in Copenhagen directly counteracted were presented to the Danish courts. This is no fun So if there are some in Jyske Bank’s board of directors, or somewhere else who would like to talk to us who have provided some evidence that Jyske Bank is doing fraud, call us if we are wrong. Then we delete immediately, but first as adults we should talk together, instead of sticking your heads in the bush. 🙂 Did you get the number Anders Christian Dam. Otherwise find the free jersey we sent to you, with pens with advertising for Mobilix The ones with the slogan Conversation promotes understanding. / Remember we are correct with a smile if there are some misunderstandings. It is no way our intention to write anything about Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager or others which is not true. Right now you are reading just about our history, about being cheated, getting sick, being threatened to be killed “So it was a former employee” It is about not having to piss on someone who is ill, and press them so they crash, it could be that they did not die even if the odds were that between 40 – 70% die within 5 years, under normal circumstances. CEO Anders Christian Dam As you well know about this diary is only made since no one on Jyske Bank’s board will speak to us. That’s why we write like this just to get air. Regardless of whether nobody from Jyske Bank reads, we hope one day that Jyske Bank’s Group and management will talk to us. Remember even if you laugh at us because you are so powerful, then it is not fun, we say again let’s talk together. Sincerely Storbjerg The Skaarup family Carsten Skaarup Soevej 5 3100 Hornbaek DK Denmark And the phone number is still +4522227713
Jyske bank købte Lundgrens advokater, selv om Jyske Banks Philip Baruch & Bestyrelsen viste sagsøger har ansat Lundgrens få måneder forinden til at fører en svig sag mod Jyske Bank A/S
Lundgren’s deler heller ikke alt fra retsbogen med klienten, derfor ved Klienten ikke hvad Lund Elmer Sandager fremlægger.
Selv om klienten gennem flere måneder har rykker mange gange for kopi af retsbogen.
Hvorfor Lundgrens ikke vil oplyse klienten, hvad Jyske Bank fremlægger, og hvilket vidner Jyske Bank ønsker, er ikke mere så underligt, efter vi har opdaget at Lundgrens advokater også er advokater for Jyske Bank.
Ligesom klienten ikke ved at det af Klienten fremlagte fra 28-12-2018, har Lundgrens advokater sørget for ikke er blevet medtaget i sagen.
Dette opdager Klienten først kort før Lundgrens advokater bliver fyret, som følge af pligt forsømmer, og efter klienten har konstateret at Lundgrens advokater er indhabile, og sikkert korrupte.
Lundgren’s advokater er sikkert selv klar over hvad de har sagt ja til, da Jyske Banks koncern tilbød Lundgrens at rådgive Jyske Bank
Hvorfor hverken Rødstenen advokater, og Lundgrens advokater, som begge direkte imod instrukser, ikke fremlagt nogle af klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S
Påstande klientens selv 28-10-2019 her må fremlægge for retten, da deres nu tidligere advokater fra firmaet Lundgrens, vælger at modarbejde klienten, og har tilbageholdt klientens mange svig påstande mod Jyske Bank, således de ikke blev fremlagt for domstolene.
Svindel sag. Har Lundgrens advokater for et ukendt millionbeløb, taget arbejde for Jyske Bank i perioden efter 5. Februar 2018. Hvor lille bank kunde tidligere ansatte Lundgrens advokater, ved partner Dan Terkildsen, der direkte i modstrid med klientens instrukser, og i saddelshed mod god advokat skik, vælger at tilbageholde klientens påstande, som om jyske Banks Svigforretninger over for retten. Jyske Bank har på et tidspunkt efter 5 febuar 2018. Da koncernenledelsen i jyske bank. Gennem deres bestyrelsesmedlem og partner Philip Baruch i Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, er blevet oplyst at Lundgrens advokater er indtrådt, som vores advokat i sagen mod jyske bank for svig og falsk. Når Jyske Bank har vidne om, at Lundgrenens advokater, er vores advokater, og at jyske bank koncernenledelse er bevidst om, at sagen mod jyske bank handler om Bedrageri og Dokumentfalsk. Altså Svig og Falsk Så er det bestemt meget usmart af jyske bank, at tage kontakt til Lundgrens advokater, for at få hjælp til en ejendoms handel til over en halv milliard kroner. / Med disse datoen er det yderst sandsynligt at, Lundgrens advokater i Ond Tro, imod god advokat skik, har valgt at hjælpe jyske bank i en trecifret million handel, på bekostning af vores påstande mod jyske bank for svig, ikke er blevet fremlagt for retten. / Lundgrens advokater har første dialog om vores sag januar 2018. Lundgrens får den første mappe med sagens beviser 5. Februar 2018. Sadolin & Albæk har for jyske bank igangsat salget Marts. 2018. Lundgrens advokater er inde første gang, og søge rundt på BANKNYT.dk 16. April 2018. Sadolin & Albæk har fået en underskrift juni 2018. Lundgrens har 21. Juni 2018 på advokatvirksomhedens hjemmeside, oplyst om deres rådgivning til jyske bank, i en handel til 600 millioner. Salget lukkes, har closing i September 2018. Lundgrens advokater Dan Terkildsen har 13. August 2019 sagt, han ikke ville politi anmeldelle jysk bank, og sagt at han jo ikke kan vide, om nogle advokater på kontoret, skulle arbejde for jyske bank, og Dan Terkildsen slutter med at sige, det er jo et stort kontor. 20. September 2019 spørger vi Lundgrens direkte, om de arbejder for jyske bank, og hvis ja hvor længe. 21. September 2019, finder vi på Lundgrens hjemme side, oplysninger om at Lundgrenens advokater har rådgivet Jyske Bank i en sag for over 1/2 milliard kroner. 600.000.000 danske kroner Lundgrens advokater har ikke 24 september svaret på brevet at 20. September, og Klienten fyre Lundgrens 25 SEPTEMBER 2019. Med CC retten Viborg Dan Terkildsen svare nu, efter Lundgrens er blevet fyret At dels vil Lundgrens ikke blandes ind i vores konspirationsteorier, og vores univers Og partner Dan Terkildsen skriver så at fordi Lundgrens advokater har arbejdet for jyske bank, har det ingen betydning for Lundgrenens advokater, i vores sag mod jyske bank for svig. Og skriver, noget som dette, vi ikke kan en advokat der ikke arbejder for jyske bank DAN TERKILDSEN LUNDGRENS Skriver dog intet om hvorfor Lundgrens mod klientens instrukser, ikke har fremlagt nogle af klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S Kik på billedet fra Lundgrens. Se hvad Lundgrens advokater skulle fremlægge, og om Lundgrens advokater har modarbejdet deres egen klient. Rådgivnings chef Thomas Stampe stopper i Oktober 2019 som managing partner i LUNDGRENS.
Lundgrens syntes at være blevet bestukket af Jyske Banks ledelse, til ikke at fremlægge nogle af klientens svig påstande.
Har Lundgrens eller Jyske Banks A/S en anden og god forklaring, så send den til +4522227713 og vi skal dele dem i dagbogen her.
See what we have “again” written 30-08-2019 just before Emil Hald Winstrøm 02-09-2019 presents something different to the court than what we have repeatedly said and continuity has written.
Dan Terkildsen partner i Lundgrens advokater partner selskab. Klik og bliv klogere på Advokat kurser Et kursus koster knap 4.000 DKK Lundgrens advokater er dygtige nok lidt for dygtige Dan Terkildsen som kunne blive minister for de konservative, hvis ikke lige Hans Engell var Braget ind i en beton klods Viser her i sagen hvad han og konservative så står for. Dan Terkildsen har meget indflydelse på Konservative folkepartis øverste top. Og er oftest ordstyrer på deres års møde. Så hvis Lundgrens advokater er blevet bestukket for at Dan Terkildsen ikke måtte fremlægge deres klients påstande mod Jyske Bank. Så er det et stort problem
Efter som hverken Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director Eller nogle andre i Lundgrens aldrig har ville fremlægge Klientens svig påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S Om Lundgrens advokater af Jyske Banks Koncern har fået bestikkelse i form af retur kommision, er mindre vigtigt. syntes Lundgrens advokat partner selskab ikke i skulle tilbage betale de penge i uberettiget har fået Mvh Meget skuffet kunde i Lundgrens
Mail til Dan Terkildsen og Emil Hald Winstrøm. Lundgrens advokater 30. August 2019. Side 1/2 Vi skal naturligvis beklage at være ordblind. Men det giver ikke Lundgrens advokater ret, til at hjælpe med at Jyske Banks svigforretninger kan fortsætte. Se hvad Lundgrens advokater fremlægger 2. September 2019 lige herunder Direkte i modstrid med deres klients instrukser.
Mail til Dan Terkildsen og Emil Hald Winstrøm. Lundgrens advokater 30. August 2019. Side 2/2 Se hvad Lundgrens advokater fremlægger lige herunder, og se om du kan se hvad Lundgrens advokater ikke har fremlagt.
We ask the conservative lawyer Dan Terkildsen.
Have you presented the Fraud chase to the court.
In the case against Jyske Bank’s board and management.
As your former client has repeatedly asked you and others in Lundgrens.
Or have you done directly opposite against the customer’s instructions.
LUNDGREN’S LAWYERS CAN ANSWER OS
004522227713
Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019 Lundgrens advokater har ikke fremlagt deres klintets påstande, her 02-09-2019 – Derfor fremlæger sagsøger bilag og påstande selv. 28-10-2019
Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019 Side 2/3 Lundgrens advokater har ikke fremlagt deres klintets påstande, her 02-09-2019 – Derfor fremlæger sagsøger bilag og påstande selv. 28-10-2019
Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019 Side 2/3 Lundgrens advokater har ikke fremlagt deres klintets påstande, her 02-09-2019 – Derfor fremlæger sagsøger bilag og påstande selv. 28-10-2019
Hvordan kan danskerne overhovedet stole på dem som vedtager landets love, hvis hverken politikere eller advokater vil stoppe åbenlyst svig mod kunder i store danske banker.
For vi er vel næppe de eneste.
And then read the Prosecution / Response we have to make and 28-10-2019 Present to the court.
When Lundgren’s lawyers work for Jyske Bank, they can not work for us in a fraud case against Jyske Bank A/S
Dan Terkildsen sagde 13-08-2019 At han tager hatten af for Klientens bil, og siger det er godt gået. Men Dan Terkildsen manipulere bare med Klienten, til at tro Lundgrens advokater er deres advokater. Og de nok skal fremlægges Klientens påstande. Det som Lundgrens advokater fremlægger 02-09-2019 Er det modsatte af hvad Klienten klart har sagt og skrevet Lundgrens deler ikke efterfølgende en kopi af svarskrift 2 med klienten Selv om klienten efterspørger en kopi Først efter Lundgrens er blevet fyret. Får Klienten en kopi Og kan se at Lundgrens må havet været korrupte
You should know that our lawyer called just before Christmas and told that Jyske Bank did not appear with their closing reply, even though the court had given a deadline
Afsluttende processkrift side 1-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 2-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 3-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 4-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 5-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
27-31 Hvad beder klienten Lundgrens advokater om, og hvad gør de ikke. 23 august 2019 22-31 Hvad beder klienten Lundgrens advokater om, og hvad gør de ikke. Mail konspondage Emil Lundgrens og klienten
Afsluttende processkrift side 6-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 7-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 8-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 9-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 10-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
30-31 Hvad beder klienten Lundgrens advokater om, og hvad gør de ikke. 23 august 2019 22-31 Hvad beder klienten Lundgrens advokater om, og hvad gør de ikke. Mail konspondage Emil Lundgrens og klienten
Afsluttende processkrift side 11-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 12-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 13-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 14-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 15-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Page 1 of 43. 27-08-2019 to Lundgren’s lawyers. The letter is just one of many, in which we repeatedly ask, Lundgren’s lawyers, such as the clerk Emil and Mette-Marie and Dan Terkildsen, to present the client’s, ie our fraud allegations against Jyske Bank. We refer to the SMSs in the letter, with allegations sent to Emil, but which none of Lundgren’s attorneys would provide. In the letter, the client refers to SMS 23-08-2019. and writes that Emil from Lundgrens has not responded to their client’s SMS / And also refers to Mette-Marie in Lundgrens. Which in turn raised our allegations 10-12-2018, to present the client’s claims to the court 18-12-2018. – IT IS A FACT. That Mette-Marie chooses with Dan Terkildsen, not to submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank, in the closing petition 18-12-2018 There Mette-Marie is doing the same thing on December 18 and will be sent to court. / IT IS A FACT That Lundgren’s attorneys 02/09/2019 make and present litigation 2, exactly 4 weeks before the scheduled hearing 30 September In this document, Lundgrens also did not include any of the client’s fraud claims. Just as it is a fact that Emil does not share Process Letter 2 with the client who first gets a copy, after Lundgrens has been fired, on suspicion that Lundgren’s lawyers are corrupt. – The main claim is still Appendix 1. a change of interest from 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000. for an underlying loan that does NOT exist. That Annex 1 is false is said 1,000 times. Just this little detail, Lundgren’s lawyers fail to present to the court. IT IS A FACT That Lundgrens, by Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie and Emil, repeatedly stated that the SWAPPEN of 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. by the client is alleged to be false. When Lundgren’s attorneys present the case, as if Appendix 1. is agreed and approved. Then, directly directly against the client’s instructions, bring the case as a case of bad advice, against the client’s claims. Then it must be Lundgrens and Jyske Bank who must have agreed this. – And why doesn’t Lundgrens send the client a copy of litigation 2. Clear that the client thinks that Jyske Bank must have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, in order not to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank Whether it is Bribery that happened by the Return Commission, or in a fee, hidden in some way, the parties to Lundgren’s lawyers must be able to explain. Like when Jyske Bank hires Lundgrens for a large million tasks. WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW IF LUNDGREN’S ADVOCATES HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED? SO YOU MUST ASK LUNDGRENS LAWYER’S AND JYSKE BANK’S MANAGEMENT
Afsluttende processkrift side 16-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 17-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 18-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 19-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 20-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 21-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 22-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 23-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 24-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 25-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 26-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 27-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 28-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 29-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 30-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 31-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 32-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 33-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 34-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 35-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 36-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 37-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 38-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 39-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 40-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 41-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 42-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 43-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 52-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
Afsluttende processkrift side 53-52. date 28-10-2019 Danish bank in major fraud case Lavet af sagsøger selv, efter klient opdager at Jyske bank har betalt Lundgrens Returkommission. “Bestikkelse” BS-402-2015
If you have read this petition with our allegations against Jyske bank for million fraud, even though we cannot spell, you would then be able to misunderstand our claims.
Here is what Lundgrens has presented 02-09-2019 NOT A WORD ABOUT FRAUD, nor an explanation for ANNEX 165, 02-09-2019. there is a replacement for Appendices 100 and 101. from 28-12-2018
And remember witnesses, Did Lundgrens knowingly forget these ,? against Jyske bank paying a bribe in the form of a return commission
COPY OF KNOWLEDGE LIST Page 1-3. 23-11-2018 at 12:14 pm. To Dan and 2 more in the office. Unfortunately, Lundgrens works for Jyske bank, and maneuver with the client’s witness list, allegations and evidence against Jyske bank Therefore, Lundgrens fails to write witnesses to the court 02-09-2019 in addition to those Jyske bank even wants to summon
COPY OF KNOWLEDGE LIST Page 2-3. 23-11-2018 at 12:14 pm. To Dan and 2 more in the office. Unfortunately, Lundgrens works for Jyske bank, and maneuver with the client’s witness list, allegations and evidence against Jyske bank Therefore, Lundgrens fails to write witnesses to the court 02-09-2019 in addition to those Jyske bank even wants to summon
COPY OF KNOWLEDGE LIST Page 3-3. 23-11-2018 at 12:14 pm. To Dan and 2 more in the office. Unfortunately, Lundgrens works for Jyske bank, and maneuver with the client’s witness list, allegations and evidence against Jyske bank Therefore, Lundgrens fails to write witnesses to the court 02-09-2019 in addition to those Jyske bank even wants to summon
Lundgrens har bekræftet vores vidner telefonisk Men har alligevel 2 timer før tidsfrist udløb for indlevering af bilag Her 2 timer før 4 ugers fristen Glemmer Emil fra Lundgrens at skrive de vidner på han tidligere, har bekræftet skulle indkaldes
Vi skal nok dele kopien alt i denne mappe er tidligere overbragt til advokater Mappen her med vores kopier er også overbragt til Lundgrens, for at være sikker på Mette Marie fra Lundgrens ikke måtte glemme vores påstande Det gjorde Lundgrens advokater alligevel Men nu var Lundgrens advokater jo også blevet købt eller ansat til at hjælpe Jyske Bank
Many times in 2018 and 2019 we have said and written to Lundgrens that the case must be presented as the fraud and fake we ask.
But the Lundgrens and Jyske Bank Group must have agreed otherwise
SEE what Lundgren’s submission to court 02-09-2019 and that without sharing with the client.
Note this here 02-09-2019 is a petition made by Lundgrens, for Lundgrens and Jyske Bank alone, it has nothing to do with what the client writes, but that Jyske bank has bought Lundgrens, the client only discovers 20-09-2019
Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019 Lundgrens advokater har ikke fremlagt deres klintets påstande, her 02-09-2019 – Derfor fremlægger sagsøger bilag og påstande selv. 28-10-2019
Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019 Side 2/3 Lundgrens advokater har ikke fremlagt deres klintets påstande, her 02-09-2019 – Derfor fremlæger sagsøger bilag og påstande selv. 28-10-2019
Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019 Side 2/3 Lundgrens advokater har ikke fremlagt deres klintets påstande, her 02-09-2019 – Derfor fremlæger sagsøger bilag og påstande selv. 28-10-2019
Bilags liste, kun bilag er fremlagt 4 uger før planlagt hovedforhandling. Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019 Side 2/3 Lundgrens advokater har ikke fremlagt deres klintets påstande, her 02-09-2019 – Derfor fremlægger sagsøger bilag og påstande selv. 28-10-2019
Appendix list, only appendices are submitted 4 weeks prior to scheduled main negotiation. Petition 2. 02-09-2019 Page 2/3 Lundgren’s attorneys have not presented their client’s claims, here 02-09-2019 – Therefore, the plaintiff submits supporting documents and claims himself. 28-10-2019
You also get exactly what Lundgrens has presented 28-09-2018. and 18-12-2018 NONE OF IT CONTAINS CLAIM’S CLAIM
Svindel sag. Har Lundgrens advokater for et ukendt millionbeløb, taget arbejde for Jyske Bank i perioden efter 5. Februar 2018. Hvor lille bank kunde tidligere ansatte Lundgrens advokater, ved partner Dan Terkildsen, der direkte i modstrid med klientens instrukser, og i saddelshed mod god advokatskikk, vælger at tilbageholde klientens påstande, om jyske Banks Svigforretninger Svinden sagen mod Jyske Bank A/S som Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, sikkert af Jyske Banks koncern ledelse, blev betalt i form af et million beløb, i form af retur kommision, for ikke at fremlægge domstolen. Hvis nogle fra Lundgrens advokater eller Nogle fra Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater eller Nogle fra Jyske Banks koncern. Er det mindste uenige i at Jyske Bank udover Bedrageri og Dokumentfalsk også benytter bestikkelse. Så ring 004522227713 Så lad os mødes og gennemgå bilagene Og rette eventuelle misforståelser. Dialog er for at undgå misforståelser
Bilag 18 er oplyst retten 28-12-2018 er rettet til Bilag 29 Bilag 19 er oplyst retten 28-12-2018 er rettet til Bilag 30 da vores advokatfuldmægtige glemte rettens oplysning af 13-11-2018 hvorfor vi rettet littering, samtidig med vi fremlægger vores sag 28-12 Appendix 18 is informed the court 28-12-2018 is addressed to Appendix 29 Appendix 19 is addressed the court 28-12-2018 is addressed to Appendix 30 as our attorneys forgot the court’s disclosure of 13-11-2018 why we corrected the litigation, while we presents our case 28-12 FAITH VI, Lundgrens got done so they disappeared, so we had to have them presented again
The Danish president of the Danish bank Jyske Bank has big problems in recognizing the bank’s fraudulent transactions against customers, is not fair banking, but when the Danish pension funds such as ATP support Jyske bank’s criminal enterprises, it is difficult to stop for the small man who is up against Denmark’s second largest bank
Vi skriver til Retten 02-08-2019 sagen er som vi oplyste retten 03-01-2018 en svig og falsk sag. Hvilket vi flere gange har oplyst vores advokat også., som i brevt af 04-11-2018 For at sikker os at sagen blev fremlagt som SVIG og at vi ikke blev misforstået
Lundgren’s lawyers got fraud and false case, against Jutland bank February 5, 2018. A case against Jyske bank for million fraud. Partner Dan Terkildsen has said he “Lundgrens” had no problem in bringing a case against Jyske Bank, which in Danish is about Million fraud in Denmark. On September 21, 2019, the Client discovers that Lundgren’s attorneys June 21, 2018 on the attorney’s website. Has stated that he has given Jyske bank advice, in connection with a property sale, for a three-digit million amount. The question now is: did Lundgren’s lawyers get this job, to counteract their little client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank. And to keep allegations against Jyske Bank for million fraud away from court. Dan Terkildsen has an unanswered question. How long have Lundgren’s lawyers worked for Jyske Bank.
Lundgrens advokater fik svig og falsk sagen, mod jyske bank 5 febuar 2018. En sag mod jyske bank om millionsvindel. Partner Dan Terkildsen har sagt, han “Lundgrens” ikke havde noget problem, med at føre sag mod jyske bank, som på dansk handler om Bedrageri i million klassen. 21. September 2019 opdager Klienten, at Lundgrens advokater 21. Juni 2018 på advokat virksomhedens hjemmeside. Har oplyst at have givet jyske bank rådgivning, i forbindelse med et ejendomssalg, for et trecifret millionbeløb. Spørgsmålet er nu: Fik Lundgrens advokater denne opgave, for at modarbejde deres lille klients svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank. Og for at holde påstande mod jyske bank for million svig væk fra retten. Dan Terkildsen har et ubesvaret spørgsmål liggende. Hvor længe har Lundgrens advokater arbejdet for Jyske Bank.
And the management of Jyske Bank should not say that since May 2016, Jyske bank allowed their customers to be exposed to deliberate fraud
LUNDGREN’s lawyers were fired on strong suspicion of having received bribes, if the Board of Lundgrens wants to explain, then we share their answer.
ISSUES ARE
Why does Lundgrens by Partner Dan Terkilsdsen not make our claims against Jyske Bank, in case Lundgrens has not been charged for not presenting the client’s claims.
Then there must be some in Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager and Jyske Bank who do not know Danish law, Dan Terkildsen could not do a course, about good legal practice and to run a reputable business.
Lundgrens is fired as a result of possible bribery, Lundgrens does not believe they are corrupt, and that we can not find a lawyer who does not work for Jyske Bank, Lundgrens in became corrupt when you chose to do a big million job for Jyske Bank, and you did not make any of our claims So Lundgrens counteracts their client Lundgrens has taken a job for Jyske bank Lundgrens has chosen not to help their client against Jyske Bank, but instead chose to help Jyske Bank against their customer. That Lundgrens sent a bill of DKK 185,000 to present these 9 pages, without submitting the client’s claims Have probably been to dry their client for funds. THIS IS A SCAM That’s why Lundgrens gets fired Do Lundgrens and Jyske Bank and Lund Elmer Sandager believe that they are kings of Denmark or not to comply with Danish law.
REMEMBER WE DON’T WANT THIS HERE, WE WANT DIALOGUE. THEREFORE CALL US +4522227713
Det handler tilsyneladende om hvem der har magten , til at frit kunne bedrage kunder i de store danske banker . – Ps mange billeder som er indsat ikke altid har noget med indlæget at gøre. – Men Hitler og stalin udnyttede også deres magt / If you choose Lundgren’s lawyers to work for you. Then be careful Lundgrens does also choose to work for the opposing part like here Jyske Bank. And is habil. In our fraud and falde case against Jyske Bank A/S 🏦. Then Lundgrens chose to accept a million jobs, offered by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, just a few months after, Lundgrens took the assignment against Jyske Bank for fraud and false. We fired Lundgrens 1 year after, when we discovered that Lundgren’s Partner Company real works for Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. And therefore directly in contravention of good lawyer custom, counteract us, and that our claims against Jyske Bank were not presented to the courts. Therefore, we would like to warn you as a client in Lundgrens, as we believe they have received a return commission from Jyske Bank A/S, to help Jyske Bank A/S A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. Click link and read more. If a lawyer counteracts their client as here in the case. Where Lundgren’s attorneys in our fraud case against Jyske Bank A / S directly against “Lundgren’s client” our instructions, we dare to submit our “client’s” claims. And when Lundgrens does the exact opposite of what the client writes Lundgren’s attorneys must do. What, then, is such a law firm called? And if the lawyers like Lundgren’s partner company like this, then also work for the counterparty, which Lundgren’s lawyers have managed to keep hidden from us for over 16 months. Is such a law firm so not corrupt. No matter how much money The board of Jyske Bank A / S has paid Lundgren’s lawyer partner company for their services. And if Lundgren’s lawyers’ cooperation with Jyske Bank has affected Lundgren’s work, in the fraud case against Jyske Bank which was therefore not presented to the court. Whether it is friendly services, between some of Denmark’s largest banks Jyske Bank and the country’s largest law firms Lundgrens. If there is no bribery and corruption then what is it? This happens in Denmark absolute top of society, and these lawyers “Lundgrens” who should ensure that the law is complied with. And so sure that there is legal certainty for the little ones when the Danish police by the Attorney General have denied that Jyske Bank is being investigated. The State Attorney thinks, just like Jyske Bank’s lawyers, Lund Elmer Sandager, who has repeatedly pleaded guilty to lying in legal matters. When the Danes are exposed to fraud, carried out by Denmark’s largest and most powerful companies, and it is reported to the police. But neither the police nor the public prosecutor will speak to the prosecutor who has presented a directory with more evidence of violation of the Criminal Code, and simply reply that the Police do not believe that Jyske Bank A / S will be punished. And then, by the State, the State Attorney is referred to bring a fraud case against Jyske Bank himself. And as now both Rødstenen’s lawyers in Aarhus and Lundgren’s lawyers in Copenhagen directly counteracted were presented to the Danish courts. This is no fun So if there are some in Jyske Bank’s board of directors, or somewhere else who would like to talk to us who have provided some evidence that Jyske Bank is doing fraud, call us if we are wrong. Then we delete immediately, but first as adults we should talk together, instead of sticking your heads in the bush. 🙂 Did you get the number Anders Christian Dam. Otherwise find the free jersey we sent to you, with pens with advertising for Mobilix The ones with the slogan Conversation promotes understanding. / Remember we are correct with a smile if there are some misunderstandings. It is no way our intention to write anything about Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager or others which is not true. Right now you are reading just about our history, about being cheated, getting sick, being threatened to be killed “So it was a former employee” It is about not having to piss on someone who is ill, and press them so they crash, it could be that they did not die even if the odds were that between 40 – 70% die within 5 years, under normal circumstances. CEO Anders Christian Dam As you well know about this diary is only made since no one on Jyske Bank’s board will speak to us. That’s why we write like this just to get air. Regardless of whether nobody from Jyske Bank reads, we hope one day that Jyske Bank’s Group and management will talk to us. Remember even if you laugh at us because you are so powerful, then it is not fun, we say again let’s talk together. Sincerely Storbjerg The Skaarup family Carsten Skaarup Soevej 5 3100 Hornbaek DK Denmark And the phone number is still +4522227713
Philip Baruch ekspert i Bank jura, også ekspert i Ledelses ansvar Philip Baruch er advokat og partner i Lund Elmer sandager. Men er også medlem af Jyske banks bestyrelse hvor Philip Baruch er Advokat. Men at Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater lyver i retsforhold, for at dække over jyske banks svig forbrydelser er skræmmende
En ihærdighed og humor selv ledelsen i jyske bank må grine med på Når en enkelt bedraget kunde i jyske bank, udstiller sig selv for den mægtige, men bedrageriske jyske bank ledelse. Kunde siger til jyske Banks ordstyrende formand Anders Dam Du er fejl og en ussel kujon, hvis ikke du tør gå i dialog med de kunder jyske bank udsætter for svindel
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Helsingoer Denmark where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
Sund fornuft er at vi taler sammen, og finder en løsning 🙂 – på værdikæden side. 33. Den måde vi betjener kunderne i jyske bank på, derfor har alle vores handler betydning. Jyske Banks Værdier er. Helhedssyn og sund fornuft Åben og hæderlig Anderledes Handlekraftig og vedholdende – Logo Gør en forskel Jyske Bank går nye veje til fordel for kunderne
Få en af de flotte trøjer Ring 22227713 Anders Dam du kan også få en helt gratis trøje, så har nummeret i nærheden hvis du vil i dialog Eller ikke er enige i vores anklager mod jyske bank for groft bedrageri
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Parliament has received information that the Danish bank, which the government has previously granted state aid, is now exposing customers to fraud and fraud
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Bagsværd. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Frederiksberg. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Østerbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Royal Theatre Det kongelige teater Kongens Nytorv
Copenhagen City Hall Square, Jyske Bank car has come to visit.
Jyske Banks afdeling i kongens Lyngby fik besøg af Jyske Banks reklame bil, slut januar måned for et godt billede. – Denmark’s most honest bank is perhaps Jyske Bank, which here in Kongens Lyngby has been visited by the Danish bank car with advertisements for Jyske Bank A / S
Det kongelige teater The Royal Theatre Kongens Nytorv
Rådhuspladsen city hall
Christiansborg Slotsplads Denmark Copenhagen
The Danish government at Christiansborg. The Danish government has been informed of the problem with Jyske Bank, and the bank’s continuous fraud against the bank’s customers.
Danish industry, the industry’s House has been visited by the Danish bank car from Jyske Bank. The car is a call for the management of Jyske Bank to stop exposing customers to deliberate fraud.
Copenhagen fashion festival ind the danish kapital.
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Kongens Lyngby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Østerbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Østerbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Kongens Lyngby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Ordrup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Kongens Lyngby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Østerbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Kongens Lyngby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Kongens Lyngby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Kongens Lyngby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Østerbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The CEO of Anders Christian Dam is probably very scared, for the small customer who accuses Anders Dam of complicity in Jyske Bank’s continuing million fraud Klik and Read 30-09-2019 – – Klik and Read 03-10-2019 Why does the customer suspect that Jyske Bank uses Bribery to disappoint in legal matters? – – The customer himself has to make the final reply on 28-10-2019 and submit their claims to the court. – – Why else does Anders Dam meet as the mighty manager and talk about the evidence against Jyske Bank for gross fraud or fraudulent conduct, which is now presented by the customer himself in the case. – If Anders Christian Dam is just a lousy coward who leads a criminal organization, or has the client misunderstood something, that is what we have been trying to figure out since May 2016. – – Dear Anders Christian Dam Call us on 004522227713 And tell us if we have been wrong, we do not want the case against Jyske Bank for fraud if we have misunderstood the group’s reasonable intentions, and there is no talk at all and neither fraud nor false. – Then you should not wake up Anders Dam and answer us. And if we are right in that, Jyske Bank exposes us to fraud, and you Anders Dam as manager of Jyske Bank are aware of it, without wanting to stop it, then you should leave the board Anders Dam, along with the rest of the board of Jyske Bank. – – If the customer is right Anders Dam, then admit, and give a public apology for the entire group management, and sorry for Jyske Bank’s fraud. – – The fact that Dan Terkildsen told Lundgrens, that Philip Baruch would agree that Jyske Bank would not complain :-(. Did you think that was enough, when we talk about scams? Anders Dam. – – We do not want the case agents the Jyske Bank management like you Anders Dam want it, but we also know, that it is an apparent criminal organization that we are up against. – In 2008/2009 a former employee and thief was milking the plaintiff’s company, then the plaintiff suffered a major brain haemorrhage, epilepsy, depression, and then exposed to exploitation and fraud by the Jyske Bank Group, which would take everything from the plaintiff who some time considered whether life was worth living. ! Since 2009, the plaintiff has been struggling to get his life back, and to have Jyske Bank stop the bank’s continued fraud. “Fraud” which today is the fight against fraud the bank is all about. – BS-402/2015-VIB It is about the fraud in Jyske Bank against the bank’s customers. That Jyske Bank so chooses the sick and weak to expose fraud is just low. 🙁 – The client himself has had to make, and submit his claims against Jyske Bank and the management of the court 28/10/2019, after suspecting that their lawyer, Lundgrens may have been bribed by Jyske Bank’s group, not to submit any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank’s group. – When Anders Dam, together with the other Group Board of Directors, chooses to stick his head in the ground, rather than engage in dialogue with the customer, it can only be because Jyske Bank is dishonest in Jyske Bank’s words and actions. – Banks are called greedy scammers and therefore, even the Executive Board, at Anders Dam has chosen not to say. – So when the President of Jyske Bank A/S Anders Christian Dam is personally accused of being involved in gross fraud against a customer in Jyske Bank, it is the responsibility of the Board of Directors, as they jointly stand behind Jyske Bank’s continuing fraudulent business. – Anders Dam is accused of being behind Jyske Bank’s deliberate fraud against the bank’s customer will continue. – – Customers also believe that Jyske Bank has paid Lundgren’s lawyers return commission. And that it is Anders Dam personally who is responsible for Jyske Bank A/S bribing the client’s lawyers LUNDGRENS, for not submitting the client’s fraud charges against the Jyske Bank group. Anyway this is what the customer sad that its looks like. – – BS-402/2015-VIB It is about the fraud in Jyske Bank against the bank’s customers. – The customer himself has to make the final reply on 28-10-2019 and submit their claims to the court. – Since Lundgren’s attorneys, who have been bought and paid for by Jyske Bank, work for Jyske Bank, and therefore certainly do not present the client’s fraud allegations against the Jyske Bank Group. – – If Lundgrens has not received a return commission “bribing”, for failing to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank. Lundgrens then call us on 004522227713 And explain to us what word in our many letters, emails, sms that you may have misunderstood. – We can see that Lundgrens will only summon the witnesses Jyske Bank’s board itself wanted. 🙁 Is this something Lundgren’s lawyers have been paid for? Just ask ? – In answer writing 28/10/2019, as the customer has give to the court, in addition to Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen, from Jyske Bank in Hillerød, which Jyske Bank A / S has wanted to call. Written, among other things, these witnesses from Jyske Bank on. Anders Christian Dam, Philip Baruch, Morten Ulrik Gade, Birgit Bush Thuesen. These witnesses must confirm the evidence presented as genuine, and in addition, witnesses must be heard in court. – – We have not initially written Anette Kirkeby, the manager of Jyske Bank Helsingor. Although Anette Kirkeby contributed to Jyske Bank Helsingor’s client being subjected to massive fraud, and this fraud was not stopped by Anette Kirkeby, who instead chooses to send the client for settlement, when the customer asks Anette Kirkeby to delete SWAP Appendix 1. This was denied by Anette Kirkeby, who insted chose that Jyske Bank can kill the customer. – – After our closing reply, we also think about convening Lundgren’s attorneys with partner Dan Terkildsen. – For Dan Terkildsen to testify, under witness responsibility, whether plaintiff has continuously asked Lundgren’s attorneys to present fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank. – And to get Lundgren’s lawyers to confirm whether or not this has happened. Then you, as a court member, can even assess whether it may be due to Bribery. – When we want to hear Lundgren’s lawyers confirm whether Lundgren’s lawyers have been employed by Jyske Bank for a million jobs. – And about Lundgren’s lawyers, first contacted by Jyske Banks, after we assumed Lundgrens. And of course we would like to know if it was Anders Christian Dam personally behind. – This case is purely about Jyske Bank’s credibility.
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Vesterbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
Bribery is not only a problem of Danish society. When a client hires Lundgrens Advokater, to file a case of fraud, executed against a Danish bank customer in Jyske Bank. And the client clearly and clearly tells Lundgren’s attorneys that the fraud crime was committed by Jyske Bank, and this is done with the Group management’s knowledge, and certainly contributes to the client in the case BS-402/2015-VIB When the customer saw over 1 year. after Lundgren’s lawyer occurred and shortly after the lawyers had been hired to file a fraud case against Jyske Bank. Discover that even the same Lundgren’s lawyer company, has been employed by the Jyske Bank Group, in a trade for DKK 600 million. And the client also discovers that Lundgren’s lawyers have countered that some of their client’s claims were brought to court. When Lundgrens directly against the client’s instructions, does not present any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank, which the client has many times given Lundgrens lawyers very clear instructions to submit. What do you call it if Jyske Bank did not pay Lundgren’s Return commission by giving Lundgren’s lawyer partner company a million orders. Should Lundgren’s Attorneys not be reported to the lawyer mentioned, as a total lawyer’s house, since Lundgren’s partner has all taken oaths. paragraph 10.4 of Lundgren’s set of rules. When it comes to violation of good attorney practice, and possible receipt of return commission in the form of million work for Jyske Bank, neither Lundgrens nor Jyske Bank’s Executive Board should hide the truth when the client only seeks the truth about the danish bank Jyske Bank’s real foundation.
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Østerbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Hellerup. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Vesterbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Vesterbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Vesterbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Vesterbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Vesterbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Valby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Valby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Valby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Valby. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen
The Danish Bank Jyske Bank in Copenhagen Business Vesterbro. Denmark – Jyske Bank where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen