Fra forsiden flyttet hertil

Tidligere forside velkommen er EN DEL ER PÅ ENGELSK 17-08-2021. flyttet hertil LINK.

Der findes mange lings til relevante opslag, som du finder på FORSIDE 17/8-2021. FORSIDE 9/12 2020. FORSIDE 8/7 2020. FORSIDE 14/3-2020.  FORSIDE 22/2-2020. FORSIDE 18/5-2018. FORSIDE 18/2-2016.

 

Now, we just want Jyske Bank Group management to admit that the bank is exposing us to fraud.

And then stop deceiving us.

 

The fact that Jyske Bank has paid our earlier, lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers to withhold our claims against Jyske Bank A/S to disappoint in legal matters, is disgusting banking business.

 

If Lundgrens does not believe they have countered the client’s allegations in being presented to the court.

Or if Lundgrens has not worked for Jyske Bank A/S.

Then we receive your “Lundgrens” explanation on phone +4522227713.

 

 

Since the Danish police will not investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, we also do not think the police will investigate whether Jyske Bank A/S has paid Lundgrens bribery, hidden as a return commission, for not submitting our allegations against Jyske Bank for Bedrageri. “FRAUD”

 

*

 

Remember that Lundgren’s lawyers must be corrupt

Since what we write and ask Lundgren to present here September 1, 2019.

And like Lundgrens, the day after September 2, 2019, is Lundgrens presented a chase as is 100% against the client’s instructions

 

*

 

Note the email of September 1 at. 11.44

 

And just below read what Lundgrens presents without sharing with the client, and without the client’s approval, September 2.

 

And then read Lundgren’s partner writes on September 5 that we do not agree.

 

Hope that Jyske bank has paid many millions to Lundgrens to disappoint in legal matters, and Lundgren’s lawyer is paying our fees back, although Dan Terkildsen thought Lundgrens has done a great job for us.

 

 

–

Lundgren’s attorneys must be visually impaired and more word blind than their client.

 

Or even if Jyske Bank A/S paid Lundgrens many millions dkk, hidden as return commission, to help cover Jyske Bank’s A/S fraud and false, against the bank’s customer, and disappoint in residual conditions.

–

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

5479 – 4563376 Nykredit

IBAN DK0854790004563376

Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.

 

---

 

–

 

When you have just read what we wrote to Lundgren’s lawyers on September 1. 2019

And what Lundgren’s submission to the court on September 2. 2019

Without wanting to send the client a copy, which we otherwise asked Partner Dan Terkildsen to send a copy of.

 

And then ask yourself, if there is a reason we since may 2016, have tried to enter into dialogue, with Jyske Bank Group CEO Anders Christian Dam

To clarify whether, this was simply a mistake, that the group in 2016 could immediately rectify.

Or if there is nothing wrong with Jyske Bank A/S Organization

 

---

 

 

If a company makes a mistake.

Then the most stupid thing is to lie to the court.

And stupid to submit a manipulated document to disappoint in legal matters.

And then it is also stupid to bribe the client’s lawyer not to submit the client’s claims in court.

Is what the customer here is up to.

–

The customer’s new lawyer phoned shortly before Christmas 2019 and said that Jyske Bank A/S did not want a dialogue.

and by the way, did not respond to our closing remarks of 28-10-2019.

We are only waiting for our new lawyer, to put on his boxing gloves as we are up against Denmark’s next largest bank Jyske Bank, as is lying and misleading where the bank can.

–

 

See the letters, mails and sms sent to, among others, Lundgren’s lawyers.

 

Where the client very clearly asks their lawyers, to present their customer’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S, and what witnesses to call.

 

We make it easy for you to look by letters, and emails during the period 11 August 2019 and until 1 September 2019.

 

And compare what we write to Lundgren’s attorneys, and what Lundgren’s attorneys present on September 2, 2019 in Petition 2.

 

And when and read it, as Lundgrens presents to the court partner by Dan Terkildsen in Lundgren

 

Dan Terkildsen writes on September 5, 2019. : There is a need to discuss the stradigy, as we obviously do not agree.

 

Now we getting pretty angry.

 

The Danish police would not investigate the Jyske Bank A/S Group for fraud and document false.

 

The police and the state attorney refuse to interrogate the notifier, or investigate the fraud, by writing Jyske bank will not be convicted.

 

Where the customer is told that they can present their case to the cevil court themselves, the damn thing is that we are trying.

 

–

 

But that large Danish lawyers companies such as Lundgrens are corrupt, and obviously have been bribed by Jyske Bank A/S

For not having to present their client’s case in court.

 

This is a threat to the Danish legal system.

The police know we are fraudulent and refuse to interfere.

 

During the period May June 2019, the Danish Parliament was informed of Jyske Bank’s fraud and document falsification

And has been provided with documentation, no one has answered.

 

🙂

 

The FSA “Finance oversight” has been asked to look into the case, but has refused to investigate the case, as it is a civil trial.

 

But when the costumers Danish lawyer Lundgrens seemed to be corrupt.

And the lawyers, do not want to present the clients case to the court, and instead try to manipulate the client, to disappoint in legal matters.

 

 

How can customers in the Danish banks then stop the banks’ ongoing fraud against them.

That Lundgrens does not even think they are corrupt, and Lund Elmer Sandager’s lawyers, on behalf of Jyske Bank A/S, write that they strongly distance themselves from allegations of bribery.

 

In view of the fact that Lundgrens, had already been employed by Jyske bank A/S

Only a few months after the grove was hired to file a case against Jyske Bank for gross fraud

 

🙂

 

And subsequently against the client’s instructions, did not submit a single statement of the customer’s claims against Jyske Bank’s group and management for participation.

 

 

And Lundgren’s lawyers also did not share the court book, nor did they choose to share more litigation with the client.

 

If the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S has not bribed Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, to help Jyske Bank’s board to disappoint in legal matters. What do you want to call this?

 

Now read our letters to Lundgrens and see how consistently Lundgren’s attorneys, quite deliberately and in bad faith, did exactly the opposite of what their client repeatedly instructed their attorneys to submit to Jyske bank A/S

 

🙂

We share all letters to Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager, the Court, and Rødstenen here.

If there’s something you can’t find, text us at +4522227713

🙂

 

 

🙂

But when you, like a half-crazy electrician without some book training, have to be your own lawyer while Lundgrens is out to disappoint in legal matters, it’s not easy. Picture is from the hospital where the client was rushed twice after his brain haemorrhage.

 

When law firms such as Lundgren’s knowingly counteract their client.

It can only be because Lundgrens has been bribed by Jyske Bank A/S

For not presenting their client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank A/S

 

 

 

REMEMBER BY LAW, LAND MUST LAND BEING BUILD

 

 

This means that everyone must comply with the law.

And no one should undermine the Danish state, or the Danish legal system.

By entering into agreements with powerful friends, not to be investigated them for fraud.

 

🙂

 

When large companies such as Jyske Bank A/S is make fraud against their customers, it is then the customer, itself that has to fight the giant to stop the fraud.

Or it is not what the police are for.

 

When Jyske Bank appeared to use bribery against those of their customers.

To stop their clients ‘attorneys who are going to file their clients’ cases against Jyske bank A/S.

 

Then this is a country-damaging business.

 

Danish and intonational law, of course, also apply to Danish banks Jyske Bank and Lundgren’s lawyers.

The former client in Lundgrens, says here to Lundgren’s partner company.

You must stop taking bribes, or what the board of directors of both Lundgrens and Jyske Bank call it.

 

 

When Lundgrens in bad faith, chose to manipulate with the client.

And not to present their clients’ claims against the Danish dank JYSKE BANK A/S. which deliberately violates Danish criminal law, in many respects.

 

But this is not a matter for the Group Board. REMEMBER

We just ask to get in dialogue.

 

We definitely think that the board of Jyske Bank should meet and call +4522227713

 

And then admit and apologize for the bank’s fraud.

 

When yes and then find a grimace that can fit and say sorry

 

🙂

 

---

 

HJÆLP MIG AT SAGSØGE JYSKE BANK for bedrageri, falsk, svig,  dokumentfalsk.

 

Just see the letter of September 1, 2019. to Lundgren’s lawyers with clear instructions, that the case is a fraud, and we claim that Appendix 1.

a swap from 16-07-2008 is false.

And we will summon 9 witnesses.

 

Compare the Prosecution 2. which Lundgrens submits to the court on September 2, 2019,

And will share some copies with the client. Lundgrens writes in Prosecution 2.

 

Nothing that the case is presented with allegations of fraud and false.

 

Lundgrens has removed 7 of the client’s 9th witnesses.

Lundgrens change the client’s claim that Appendix 1. is false, that Appendix 1. the swap is agreed.

 

 

And when we fire Lundgrens you will not repay our money.

Then Dan Terkildsen think they have done a great job, but it must be for the counterparty Jyske Bank A/S.

 

---

 

Letters come a little below And inserted continuously.

 

This is a true story of when Jyske Bank stole from us 12 years of our lives.

While Jyske Bank exposes us to gross fraud.

 

And the fact that the danish bank Jyske Bank A/S used a document falsely, and make mandated fraud, even lied to the court, is just one of Jyske Bank’s business areas, when the board maintains that fraud is a great way to operate a bank in Denmark.

 

Anders Christian Dam has been able to stop the scam since May 2016, but he has refused.

 

 

 

It may be that you think we are crazy.

But this is the truth about Jyske Bank’s business methods.

Methods such as Jyske Bank A/S will hardly only expose us.

And therefore it is a major Danish social problem.

🙂

 

Hope for your understanding and that you can read it as we explain.

After all, it is the small customer, in the large Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S

 

Who not only had to fight against serious illnesses, and then against Jyske Bank A/S who is grossly deceiving their customer.

 

But that we as a customer, have also really had to fight against our 2 most recently lawyers Rödstenen and Lundgrens, who must be extremely corrupt, since they have merged the pillars with Jyske Bank against us.

🙂

 

 

 

Jyske Bank’s debt collection department demanded that our house be sold.

Just as when Jyske Bank at Anette Kirkeby department head Jyske Bank Helsingoer, and Casper Dam Olsen Jyske Bank Hilleroed, sales of the building site demanded Bybjergvej 45.

 

Which Jyske Bank afterwards denies any knowledge of.

 

Now we did not think that Lundgrens would harm our case against Jyske Bank A/S by simply not presenting it.

 

 

 

 

 

Birgit Buch Thuesen Jyske Bank Silkeborg

Then refused to open a deposit account, or receive the sale proceeds.

The buyer could therefore not pay for the building site for over 3 years.

While Jyske Bank tries to harm their customer financially as much as possible.

 

🙁

 

 

 

As today 2020, when the groups continue the bank’s fraud, by continuing to raise interest rates 5,32 %, also that part of the loan, that has been forcibly repaid, whether the customer has a swap or not.

 

But the management of Jyske Bank’s group is completely indifferent.

 

The Board of Directors has been there at least since 19-05-2016. been 100% aware that Jyske Bank A/S, by forcibly reducing an alleged underlying loan, to Jyske Bank’s swap, which is allegedly restructured, Annex D.

 

Without letting the Bank Swap. from 16-07-2008 Annex 1. follow down.

Remember that we have not agreed on any interest rate swap 16-07-2008, but have one from 15-07-2008 if we want to borrow 4,328,000 dkk. Appendix Y.

 

 

Here you see the fake swap of 4,328,000 dkk, a result of Annex 1.

 

Which Jyske Bank itself made on 16-07-2008. without agreement with the customer.

But as Jyske Bank for every price wants the customer to  deceived.

 

---

---

 

Here is the swap that was made on 15-07-2008 and is agreed with the customer if they take out an underlying loan of 4,328,000 dkk. in Nykredit, to the interest rate swap.

 

But Jyske Bank chooses not only to lie to the client, and so the client’s attorneys, even against the court, Jyske Bank A/S by Lund Elmer Sandager lies to want to disappoint in legal matters.

 

Here you can see that Jyske Bank consistently lies.

And likes to lie to the court as well.

 

As you can see, Jyske Bank has not only paid to the court. Jyske Bank Board member Philip Baruch has also withheld information.

As if the interest approved by the customer on 15-07-2008 exchange for the offer Appendix Y.

 

But also withheld that the swap will be closed 30-12-2008.

In addition, the bank’s attorney and board member Philip Baruch have also provided manipulated and false information to the court.

As the annual report 2008 Appendix O. where Jyske Bank has manipulated the annual report, and removed 2 agreement documents.

 

Jyske Bank did not come to say that it showed nothing to the bank when Philip Baruch himself presented Appendix E. pages 4 and 5 of the swap from 15-07-2008.

 

But in addition to this, there are many more manipulated and counterfeit documents, which supports that Jyske Bank’s organization is criminal, and that is what we are up against.

 

 

Read our submitted closing Reply of 28/10/2019.

 

We have had to make and present it ourselves, after we got a corrupt lawyer company, that turned out not to be reputable, just like Jyske bank A/S Denmark

 

 

28-10-2019. Final Prosecution Case BS-402 2015-VIB Claims Appendix 1 is False

Date 27-10-2019 presented with some spelling and typos as Lundgrens counteracted the submission of the case.

 

 

We have to complain a lot as there are some spelling and typos

But got only on the 13 scale 05 in Danish and 03 in English, and thus has no book education,

 

That was also why we sought help from Lundgrens lawyers, who work with several Danish banks.

 

 

 

For 43 months up to this submission, we have in reality been without a lawyer, although the last 2 have forgiven to be our lawyer, they have real work for Jyske Bank A/S

 

So for those of you who want dishonest lawyers, you must of course still choose Lundgrens lawyers or you can also choose Lund Elmer Sandager, who has shown they are willing to lie in legal matters as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

---

 

That is, 1 year before the customer chooses 03-07-2009 to pick up, a late and other offer for a new project of 4,300,000 dkk

From 06-05-2009.

 

 

Note that Jyske Bank still raises 5.32% in interest, and that of DKK 2,514,583.

 

While the customer owes Dk 976,439 on the loan the customer was offered 06-05-2009 at Annex AG.

 

And thus returned home on 03/07/2009 at an interest rate of 2,4987%

 

See Annex AH.

Was sent to Jyske Bank I.L.Tvedesvej 7. 3000 helsingore. After Jyske Bank then forces the plot Bybjergvej to be sold, and 3 years after goes to the loan repayment Annex AH. If Jyske Bank refuses to duck at Jyske Bank, the customer is forced into a legal battle, where Jyske bank also buys the Customer’s lawyers to work for Jyske Bank.

 

 

 

The Jyske Bank Group is now deliberately, and dishonestly exposing their customer to deliberate and gross fraud.

 

🙂

 

We update the banking news page and make it more manageable.

Moves most subpages to the blog.

 

Instead, there are some pages where we describe Jyske Bank’s many violations of the Criminal Code, that is to say, economical crimes.

 

Regardless of whether Jyske Bank’s board members, have several political friends, who can have political influence, that neither the Danish police, the State Attorney, nor the Ministry of Justice have wanted to help the victim, who is exposed to gross exploitation and financial crime in Jyske Bank A/S, well and the brand is supported by Jyske Bank’s group management in association.

 

Although we did not think this is funny

 

We have only been able to fight against Jyske Bank, by writing about the group’s crimes against us as a customer.

 

Since the Jyske Bank Group management, with a very high probability, has paid our former lawyer

 

Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.

By Partner Dan Terkildsen and his co-head, at least Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen, Pernille Hellesøe, Mette Marie Nielsen, Emil Hald Winstrøm.

Not very likely had plans to present the client’s claims in court.

 

 

Page about Jyske Bank’s claims and their denials, where at Jyske Bank A/S has written off our loan offered 06-05-2009 Appendix AG.

reduced with the sale, without letting the interest rate swap Appendix 1. follow down.

 

Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not.

The Jyske bank group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank knows this, and that the Board of Directors supports the bank’s fraud.

 

As Mette Marie Nielsen from Lundgrens said, when she called on 18 December 2018 approx. 5 pm and told

These are some very serious accusations we make against Jyske Bank.

To which Mette Marie Nielsen is informed, that she must look in the folder with the evidence, that she has personally been given.

 

 

The fact that the Danish lawyer’s houses, such as the law firm Rödstenen in aarhus, choose to cover up a bank’s crimes by directly opposing their client’s extension of allegations against Jyske Bank A/S never presented to the court, is critical when the same lawyer’s house Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, tries wanted to close the case against Jyske bank A/S, and claims it was agreed by telephone.

 

In one case we write to Thomas Schioldan Sørensen Rödstenen attorneys and ask if there is anything new in the case.

 

Thomas answer so we have agreed to close the case, which he sent a letter about.

 

A little funny.

 

That this alleged letter has never come, only because we move we get stuck in the agreement Rödstenen and Jyske Bank A/S with great sense made to close the case.

 

When Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is claiming that there was a telephone agreement, between the plaintiff and 2 attorneys from Rödstenen in Århus, as a client, we would stand badly.

 

There are, after all, the words of Rödsten’s 2 lawyer against, the small plaintiff, who is up against Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank.

 

Fortunately we had already become suspicious that Rödsten’s lawyers could be corrupt, but could not prove it.

 

Therefore we have also contacted, our lawyer from the Appeals Board in Case 328/2013. Søren Narv, who has been extremely helpful.

 

And has in 2017 seen some of the papers we have found, and which did not seem to agree with what Jyske Bank A/S “Lund Elmer Sandager” has presented, Søren looks puzzled at the appendices and says.

 

If the documents are genuine:

Then it looks completely criminal.

 

 

That is why we decide, that it is probably best to record the conversation between the plaintiff and Rödstenens 2 attorneys.

Which should prove to be a good decision.

 

Since we have subsequently been able to prove that Rödstenens attorneys, at Thomas Schioldan Sørensen have lied in order to bring the case against Jyske Bank.

 

If Thomas Schioldan Sørensen still does not believe to have lied to the client.

 

Then we should like to lay the record on her.

 

 

 

And in order to help Jyske bank A/S, to disappoint in legal matters, partly by not presenting the client’s many fraud allegations against Jyske bank, with the worst would, Thomas have tried to close the case, behind the back of the client.

 

And in direct contravention of the customer’s instructions.

 

After the law firm Rödstenen, by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, is revealed to have acted dishonestly and dishonestly against the client, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen himself chooses to withdraw from the case.

 

But Thomas Schioldan Sørensen is not done

Thomas writes repeatedly and recommends that we give up as we have a very bad case.

 

 

Which is not the case with Lundgren’s Partner Dan Terkildsen 28-08-2019. pm. 15.42 in mail writing.

 

Depreciation:

I think we have a good case if we stick to the very simple, as I have written earlier written that the swap agreement concerns a loan that has never been paid off.

 

Dan Terkildsen also writes in mail 28-08-2019

That Lundgrens will not use strong words about “should probably stand as” fraud and false.

Partly because we don’t have to.

And partly because it does not benefit our cause.

And not necessary.

 

In other words, Lundgren’s attorneys who were transferred to the case on February 5, 2018, and repeatedly instructed to present the case as fraud and false, now write August 28, 2019, that they will not submit it.

 

 

If not, because Lundgrens works for Jyske Bank A/S and will harm our case, simply by not presenting the client’s claims at all.

 

 

Then, before Lundgrens entered into their million kroner’s cooperation with Jyske Bank A/S, Lundgrens should have withdrawn.

That is unless this cooperation, was entered into between Lundgrens and Jyske Bank in order to disappoint in legal matters.

So when so many lawyers at Lundgrens, have actively helped not to present their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S

 

 

Then it smells of corruption and bribery done between Lundgren’s lawyer partner company and Jyske Bank’s group management.

 

Who with their over 100 employees, have actively chosen to help Jyske Bank A/S disappoint in legal matters, by not providing what the client has given instructions to provide.

 

This here feels like an assault and is outright evil, and dishonest business practices.

 

We already accuse Jyske Bank of being fraudulent.

 

Just read the sea there since Nov 2016 has been written on the car here.

 

But now also Lundgren’s lawyers for being corrupt.

 

 

 

Since Lundgrens cannot find out to present our claims.

Like present our claim against Jyske Bank’s regarding the sale of the land, and thus an extra ordinary installment on the loan, from 03-07-2009 in Nykredit, which Jyske bank forgives to interest swap, without simultaneously reducing the swap, at the same time as the actual loan.

 

 

 

Jyske Bank, as always, denies whether it is help with money laundering, their poor advice or otherwise, Jyske Bank always has a different opinion.

 

But that Jyske Bank refuses to have anything to do with the case of the building site Bybjergvej 45, and refuses to close the transaction, as it took 3 half a year, before Nykredit finally replied, that they would now like to close the deal, even though Nykredit was not obliged to do so.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thus, we also had to pay interest on that loan in Nykredit and 3% in Contribution during the period when Jyske Bank tried to undermine our business financially, while also exposing us to fraud.

 

All of this here seems to Lundgrens not important, and it will hurt our case against Jyske Bank to present.

 

This is at least what Lundgrens Dan Terkildsen writes in his email 28-08-2019, and deliberately does not write our 9 witnesses, only the 2 witnesses that Jyske Bank itself wants to approve Lundgrens will be called.

 

Since Lundgrens does not submit one, of our allegations against Jyske bank A/S for gross exploitation and fraud

As Dan Terkildsen says it will harm our case

 

 

And that Lundgrens will not even send us a copy of the Prosecution dated 02-09-2019 supports our suspicion, of that Lundgren’s lawyer’s business is corrupt.

 

WHY

 

 

The case is about FRAUD, Exploitation, withholding of evidence, document manipulation, and lying in legal matters, that’s some of Jyske Bank’s preferred tools in the bank’s struggle to disappoint in legal matters.

 

But we do not want to find ourselves in Jyske Bank A/S is deceiving, one is that the Danish police refuse to interrogate and investigate Jyske Bank for fraud, and say that you have to bring your claims even in the district court.

 

 

Jyske Bank has submitted supporting documents such as these to win the right to raise interest rates of DKK 4,328,000. At the same time, Lundgrens will not submit that the Bank has forced the customer to sell land, and reduce the bank loan in Nykredit Annex AH.

 

without Lading the interest rate swap down, Dan terkildsen says it will hurt my case to submit the seed something, and we will must agree with what Jyske Bank and Lundgrens must have agreed

 

Jyske Bank has repaid our loan 4,300,000 dkk offered 06-05-2009 Annex AG.

reduced by sale of building land, without leaving interest rate swap Appendix 1. down.

 

---

 

 Regardless of Appendix 1. is false or not

The Jyske Bank Group commits gross fraud, roughly because Jyske Bank employees know it. and roughly Jyske Bank’s board of directors in association supports the bank’s convoluted fraud.

 

Jyske Bank’s management, believes that they have the right to take interest from Appendix 1.

And that it should be paid to Jyske Bank, That the customer has not discovered.

 

 

At the customer has not discovered, Jyske Bank has repeatedly maligned with appendices.

 

That Jyske Bank has succeeded in lying to the customer since 2008 / 2009 that the Customer has taken out the loan of 4,328,000 in Nykredit.

 

That it has succeeded in lying to the customer that the loan of the DKK 4,300,000 in Nykredit, has been repaid.

 

That Jyske Bank has succeeded in covering the swap, customer approved 15-07-2008 which was closed on 30-12-2008.

 

 

 

That the customer has not discovered that Jyske Bank has made one year’s settlement from 2008 Appendix O. where Jyske bank has removed an agreement attachment that starts on 15-07-2008 and closes on 30-12-2008

 

 

That the client was ill about 5 years after a brain haemorrhage, and therefore has not discovered the massive lies.

And that Jyske Bank has made a false document.

According to Jyske Bank,

 

The Jyske Bank must be harmed. And for safety’s sake, made an agreement with Lundgrens, not to submit any of the customer’s claims.

Well, they are proficient in the Danish banks.

 

---

 

Here are Appendices that should have been removed 20-11-2008.

 

But as Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors now uses towards their customer.

 

Appendices that should only be used if we wanted to repay the offered loan of DKK 4,328,000.

 

Nicolai Hansen got these attachments signed on 10-07-2008

 

Because they were ready, and assured the customer, that they would not be used if we did not take the loan offer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors will now use all shootings against their customers.

 

And try to get these cashiers’ attachments to be a disbursed loan in Nykredit, even though Nykredit has informed Jyske bank 06-05-2009 that they have lapsed.

 

Although Nykredit writes to Jyske Bank 06-05-2009 that the earlier offer and mortgage deed have lapsed.

 

Jyske Bank is in bad faith, and 20-05-2009 Resevere upward repayment to Nykredit of DKK 4,328,000, in connection with claims about more mortgage.

 

 

 

 

Annex 18 and 19. / 18-12-2018

Since Lundgrens Mette Marie Nielsen 18-12-2018 agrees to present these 2 appendices, as appendices 18 and 19.

It was almost during protest that I asked for more of my annexes to be presented but I did not have to, if more documents were to be submitted, Dan Terkildsen had to approve it, and he sat in a partner meeting.

You can hear Mette Marie Nielsen say on the recordings, that Lundgren’s lawyers had control with our case. Even dayes, before December 18, you can hear the assumptions Mette Marie Nielsen confirms that they will probably get it all and that it is controlled.

 

But the lawyers in Lundgrens who have their eyes on the case obviously have other plans, than to present our case against Jyske Bank for fraud.

–

 

Before you consider using or working for Lundgren’s attorneys, you should read the page here to know if Lundgrens is a corrupt law firm it is bribed to harm some of their clients’ cases.

 

Here a LINK to the same page. But in Danish

Here comes a LINK to all Appendix

Letters come a little below And inserted continuously.

You need to keep up as, we insert more and more letters, to help you understand how big this case has become. – Small for Jyske bank A/S But big for us, who have had, to present our claims to the court by ourself.

 

On this page, you should be able to see many of the letters we have sent on a regular basis,

for the most part that Lundgrens has not answered.

 

 

Read and see how we have been begging Lundgren’s lawyer partner company to help us, and present our claims to the court.

 

Which Lundgrens did not live up to.

 

🙁

 

So you can understand, that this case ranks very high, in the political system, where no government will help the victim, which is exposed to the Danish bank Jyske bank’s crimes against the small company.

 

The company therefore only fights 1 man against Denmark’s second largest bank Jysk bank, to get the bank’s fraud against the customer stopped.

 

🙂

 

The client who has found one lawyer.

Who is alone. And who is honest.

And would like to help the client bring their case against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and false in danish court.

 

🙂

 

Now at least these 5 lawyers. at Lundgren’s partner company

 

Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner

Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent.

Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev

Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev

Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director

 

All these in Lundgren’s partner company, has had with our case to do, should so many lawyers at Lundgrens be able to misunderstand, what we have continuously written. ! Hardly.

 

 

 

Or have Lundgrens, received a million payments from Jyske Bank A/S In the form of return commission.

 

Just to misunderstand, and ignore everything, which we have constantly written, should be presented in court.

 

🙁

 

As Thomas Schioldan Sørensen has sent our case and many letters, and emails to Lundgren’s many attorneys, as so also has been able, to see and read the letters which we since February 2016, have been sent to Thomas Schioldan Sørensen rodstenen, about changing the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and false.

 

That Thomas Schioldan Sørensen from Rödstenen has ignored, our new allegations is on thing.

But that Lundgrens can be bought by the defendant, to work for the defendant is abhorrent.

 

And so Lundgrens has even boasted about it on their own website. “by Niels Gram-Hanssen partner”

Although Partner Dan Terkildsen of Lundergren’s lawyers, after they were fired, has written It is conspiracy theories. And that Lundgrens has done a great job for us.

 

 

Then we thought this is similar to more and more damaging business, and it seemed to happen by bribery between some of Denmark’s largest companies.

 

But here Goliath is up against little David, who does not intend to give up just because the danish bank Jyske Bank has found political contacts.

 

As we the plaintiff has written several times to management.

Then we just want dialogue, not to be exposed to continued fraud. Again, we ask everyone involved to call +4522227713 If there is anything here on the page that is wrong, so it can be fixed right away, but this is not the first time we are writing this.

 

As you can see here are a few letters “but more and more are coming” to Lundgren’s lawyers about the fraud case against the Danish bank Jyske bank A/S, try to look through letters and then ask yourself if there is corruption in Denmark’s largest law firms and the Danish banks.

 

Som du kan se, er her er par breve til Lundgrens advokat partner selskab, omkring svig sagen i mod den danske bank Jyske bank A/S, prøv at se breve igennem og spørg så dig selv, om der findes korruption i Danmarks største advokatvirksomheder og nogle af de danske banker.

 

See appendix we believe supports that Jyske bank in Denmark has paid return commission

Bribe to Lundgren’s lawyers for not presenting some of our claims against Jyske Bank A/S, English texts appear on all pictures that come much more, since it no longer only is a case of fraud as it is written in all emails and written to Lundgren’s lawyer partner company.

 

–

 

We have of course written to our talented lawyer Thomas Schioldan Sørensen from Rödstenen’s attorneys, as we want free trial.

 

Thomas has applied but not explained why, as explaining that the case has the public interest, why we ourselves are forced to seek free trial in the fraud case against Jyske bank.

 

We want the police to investigate Jyske Bank’s continued crimes against the bank’s customer. And get it stopped. But, in response to the Easter 2016 notification, Police write Case No. 0100-83966-00085-16 just briefly. There is no need for investigation Jyske bank A/S or the board.

 

 

Will not be convicted.

🙁

The State Attorney recommends that the client himself get a lawyer to present the case in civil court.

 

 

For which there is a need for legal assistance, the client “plaintiff” then hires a lawyer on February 5, 2018. Unfortunately, the client in Jyske Bank A/S chooses Lundgren’s lawyers, who have been highly recommended, by a former bank director.

 

Lundgren’s lawyer partner company which turned out to be for sale to the highest bidder.

Shortly thereafter, Lundgrens will be purchased by the Danish bank Jyske Bank A/S, the same bank that exposes the customer to fraud.

 

You may also think it is perfectly fine as several large shareholders in Jyske Bank who all know the case here.

 

BS-402/2015-VIB But we found this here, similar to more and more damaging business. We are probably not as smart as Jyske Bank’s powerful board. And it then appeared that bribery between some of Denmark’s largest companies is, in the applicant’s belief, fraudulent, if not malicious, business. But as Lundgrens partner Dan Terkildsen says it is nothing, but conspiracy theories. There are no others who would comment on our case officially. Would you like to comment on the case, and the evidence of the case Be free to call 004522227713

 

 

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is as if there is a consensus that no one in Denmark will help the customer as Jyske Bank exposes fraud.

The Board of Directors has received information from Nykredit Annex 30 that there is no underlying loan. and information from Annex AG. 06-05-2009 that the underlying loan offer offered from 20-05-2008 and mortgage deed for this has lapsed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

–

–

 

During update

 

Banking News In the case BS-402/2015-VIB Where, among others, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen of Rödstenen lawyers, and lawyer and partner Dan Terkildsen of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, is in bad faith, and have countered their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S For deliberate and continued gross fraud was never filed by the client’s attorneys.

 

The client believes that both Rödstenen and Lundgrens have worked for Jyske bank in order to disappoint in legal matters.

 

By not presenting the client’s claims to the court. The period during which Rödstenen and Lundgrens have countered their client’s case and claims, have been presented to the court, is during the period between February 2016 and until September 2019

Where the client is forced to fire Lundgren’s lawyers after discovering that Lundgrens, has worked for Jyske bank A/S in a 3 digit million trade. And therefore have been incompetent, and corrupt.

 

The client is compelled to present the final litigation, which is 28/10/2019 If you cannot understand Lundgrens or Rödstenen’s attorneys have not submitted the client’s claims, so you can ask.

 

Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99

 

Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35

Why the client should act as a lawyer himself, and make his final defense 28-10-2019, as both Rödstenen Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen should be the client’s lawyer.

 

The client is personally obliged to present the closing litigation 28-10-2019 according to which their lawyers have taken care of Jyske bank’s interests.

 

And probably to disappoint in legal matters neither Rödstenen nor Lundgrens, submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S.

 

If you cannot understand Lundgrens and Rödstenen’s attorneys, and why these law firms, directly against the client’s continuous instructions, have not presented any of the client’s claims against Jyske bank A/S.

Then you can ask them yourself

 

Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99

 

and

 

Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35

 

 

 

Just ask why the client himself should act as a lawyer, and even had to make the closing defense.

 

Since neither Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgrens by Dan Terkildsen would be the client’s lawyer.

 

You can find the draft for the new front page that comes on the bank here. When we look at all the inquiries to our attorneys, we look at the mails and letters, we have written since February 2016 to Rödstenen’s attorneys Thomas Schioldan Sørensen.

 

And to Lundgren’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen, until we fired them in September 2019. It is clear that both law firms has had an financial interests with Jyske Bank A/S certainly with Board member Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager as between man.

 

 

But Dan Terkildsen believes, that everything are conspiracy theories, at the same time Philip Baruch strongly take distances from the fact that bribery between Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgrens took place.

 

The question is just what the hell did Jyske Bank’s group have to hire Lundgrens for. When Jyske bank’s lawyer Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager, knew that Lundgrens had come on as our lawyer.

 

We do not hide anything, and would like to talk about this here, therefore we play with open cards.

The question is whether there are some, who can trust the Danish banks as we here provide evidence of operating fraudulent bank, and deliberately lying, and conceal the truth.

 

Yes even to the seat, Jyske Bank board member Philip Baruch is lying at the same time that Lund Elmer Sandager is presenting manipulated evidence to disappoint in legal matters.

 

If we are wrong why no one will talk to us at all. Don’t you see we actually want to have a dialogue with Jyske bank’s board of directors.

 

Call  +4522227713 And let’s meet as adults.

 

And you just have to go through the case with us. If we are wrong then there is nothing we would rather do, than bring the case against Jyske bank for fraud and false. And bring the chase out of court again because we don’t think this is hilarious.

Unless Lundgrens has not countered their client’s case in being presented to court, we believe there is bribery.

 

The big question now is rather.

How much does Jyske Bank A/S have Paid Lundgren’s lawyers.

 

Do we have a bribery case here? The most common definition is: “a payment intended to cause someone to do something dishonest, illegal or contrary to his or her duties for the purpose of obtaining an unjustified benefit”. If this is not the case for Jyske Bank A/S active bribery, when the bank has offered, Lundgren’s lawyer partner company to do a million work for Jyske Bank A/S

And if there is no passive bribery for Lundgrens Advokat partner company, accept a million assignment from Jyske bank A/S if the purpose is to override that our claims against Jyske Bank A/S are never presented.

 

WHAT IS THIS HERE

 

Pligt-forsømmelse,en. (jf. -forsømmende samt -forglemmelse; især emb.) undladelse af at gøre sin pligt; forsømmelse af ens pligter, navnlig: ens embedspligter

 

Duty-neglect, one. (cf. neglecting and forgetting; especially emb.) failure to do his duty; neglect of one’s duties, in particular: one’s official duties

 

 

Vidste Bestyrelsen i Lundgrens, ikke at Jyske bank A/S udsatte deres klient for bedrageri, da Lundgrens valgte at arbejde for Jyske Bank A/S.

 

Kunne Lundgrens på nogen måde misforstå det klienten, bad Lundgrens advokater om at fremlægge for retten.

Det handler om din retssikkerhed, hvis der findes korrupte advokater i Danmark Findes de så kun i Lundgrens, eller er Lund Elmer Sandager også med.

 

---

---

---

---

---

---

 

We now share letters to, and from Lundgren’s attorneys here in the case.

Lundgrens has consistently avoided responding to anything concerning the Client’s allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.

See the many letters where we repeatedly ask Lundgren’s attorneys, to present our case, with the fraud allegations and evidence against Jyske Bank A/S that we wish to present in court.

The same applies to witnesses to whom Lundgren’s lawyers are instructed to call.

Lundgren’s attorneys Do not submit any of the client’s claims, only write down those statements that Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors Philip Baruch will have called.

You can see them here, and read the few times where Lundgrens answers, and read how Lundgrens has answered without any reply.

Yes Lundgren’s attorneys have stated directly against the Client’s Instructions, the exact opposite of what the Client has clearly written for Lundgrens.

Can so many lawyers, at the largest Danish law firms such as Lundgrens, be so stupid.

And disappoint in legal matters as it looks like this.

Follow the case in Denmark’s probably biggest fraud case, where the Danish bank Jyske Bank and their board, with a large political network are behind.

The customer himself has had to present, the deliberate and obvious fraud against the bank’s customer to the Danish courts on 28-10-2019.

And then just ask to you self, why the authorities will not intervene against Jyske Bank’s board of directors, or at least give the police permission to conduct an investigation into the banks fraud.

Remember you can very easily become the next “victim” one as Jyske Bank A/S, Lund Elmer Sandager, wants to expose fraud.

While Rödstenen and Lundgren’s lawyers want to help Jyske Bank A/S.

Even if we just asked Anders Christian Dam to stop, for Jyske bank A/S to not do fraud, then corporate management does not intend to quit.

The lawyers.

Rödstenen Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, Lundgrens by Dan Terkildsen, Lund Elmer Sandager by Philip Baruch has shown that they are fighting against all laws and regulations, to help Jyske Bank disappoint in legal matters.

REMEMBER WE WISH JUST A DIALOGUE.

+4522227713

Soevej 5.

3100

Denmark

So we encourage everyone involved in this fraud case to dialogue.

Remember conversation promotes understanding, and then we avoid misunderstandings.

CEO Anders Christian Dam call 004522227713

And let’s meet then, because there is something wrong with Jyske Bank’s fairness.

 

 

Here are the first letters that Lundgrens did not want to answer.

Trying to put them in date order so you can follow, around allegations to be made and witnesses to be summoned, Lundgrens 100% counteracts their client here in the case in order to disappoint in legal matters.

 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

 

 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

 

–

 

 

 

 

–

 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Please note that Lundgren’s Attorneys have not sent a copy of their client

Petition B. 20-03-2019.

Petition C. 27-08-2019. and

Petition 2. 02-09-2019

Just as Lundgren has also withheld several other court documents to their client, such as the court’s letter of 08-01-2019, where the court states that they disregard Appendix 28-101. with the client’s allegations from 28-12-2018

 

At the same time that Lundgrens is working for the defendant in the case. And Lundgren’s attorneys have worked against everything that can be known as good attorney practice. And have no control over the document number, submitted documents without covering the BBC by mail.

 

 

 

And otherwise, annexed 09-07-2019 presented without informing the court why, or notifying the client.

This case showed that the Danish legal community is under pressure from both Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager and not least Jyske Bank

 

 

 

–

–

Now we are not the ones giving up. It may well be that Lundgrens is rooted, in their accounts and other lawyer cases.

 

But one is that their bookkeeping, could not find these 2 payments, which were posted to the wrong client account. And now the page, is posted in our account but on a very wrong date.

 

Date on account withdrawal, must vote with similar payments, and not posted with dates, that are months after. But it doesn’t matter at Lundgren’s partner company.

 

 

Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director

 

–

–

This Appendix List is made from Appendix 98, which we submitted on 28/10/2018, but which the court chose 08-01-2019 to disregard, Lundgrens does not tell anything about this to their client, who until 27-08-2019 believes Appendix 28 -101 is presented.

 

But that has Lundgrens lawyers hidden, from their client, until the client twice asked the court for access to their client’s case against Jyske Bank A/S for fraud and fake.

 

FRAUD AND FALSE As to date, Lundgren’s attorneys, have been able to stay out of court.

While Lundgren’s partner company quite clearly has planned to attend the main hearing on September 30, August 1, 2019, without having submitted one of the client’s many allegations against Jyske bank for fraud crimes carried out, and supported by the bank’s board in association.

 

Dan Terkildsen. Advokat og Partner Pernille Hellesøe. Team Assistent. Mette-Marie Nielsen. Fuldmægtig / Elev Emil Hald Winstrøm. Fuldmægtig / Elev Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen. Advokat Director

 

 

 

 

–

–

 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–