11-03-2020 Previous front page until new, During update.

 

This page here is the old cover page, that has been written in recent years.

The reason we moved it over here is that on the Welcome Banking news page. Banknyt.dk we will explain the case as we filed it in court 28/10/2019, after we found evidence that Lundgren’s lawyers were corrupt, and apparently paid by Jyske bank A/S for not presenting our case to the court.

In this connection, you will be able to see all letters, mails sent to Lundgrens, with clear instructions to present our case as fraud and false, which we have also written to the court, where we have clearly written that the case is expanded with several claims after Section §  358 of the Code of Civil Procedure,

In the case BS-402/2015-VIB Where, among others, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen of Rödstenen lawyers, and lawyer and partner Dan Terkildsen of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, in bad faith have countered their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S For deliberate and continued gross fraud was never filed by the client’s attorneys. The client believes that both Rödstenen and Lundgrens have worked for Jyske bank in order to disappoint in legal matters. By not presenting the client’s claims to the court. The period during which Rödstenen and Lundgrens have countered their client’s case and claims, have been presented to the court, is during the period between February 2016 and until September 2019 Where the client is forced to fire Lundgren’s lawyers after discovering that Lundgrens, has worked for Jyske bank A/S in a 3 digit million trade. And therefore have been incompetent, and corrupt. The client is compelled to present the final litigation, which is 28/10/2019 If you cannot understand Lundgrens or Rödstenen’s attorneys have not submitted the client’s claims, so you can ask. Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99 Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35 Why the client should act as a lawyer himself, and make his final defense, as both Rödstenen Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen should be the client’s lawyer. The client is personally obliged to present the closing litigation 28-10-2019 according to which their lawyers have taken care of Jyske bank’s interests. And probably to disappoint in legal matters neither Rödstenen nor Lundgrens, submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S. If you cannot understand Lundgrens and Rödstenen’s attorneys, and why these law firms, directly against the client’s continuous instructions, have not presented any of the client’s claims against Jyske bank A/S. Then you can ask them yourself Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99 and Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35 Just ask why the client himself should act as a lawyer, and even had to make the closing defense. Since neither Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgrens by Dan Terkildsen would be the client’s lawyer. You can find the draft for the new front page that comes on the bank here. When we look at all the inquiries to our attorneys, we look at the mails and letters, we have written since February 2016 to Rödstenen’s attorneys Thomas Schioldan Sørensen. And to Lundgren’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen, until we fired them in September 2019. It is clear that both law firms has had an financial interests with Jyske Bank A/S certainly with Board member Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager as between man. But Dan Terkildsen believes, that everything are conspiracy theories, at the same time Philip Baruch strongly take distances from the fact that bribery between Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgrens took place. The question is just what the hell did Jyske Bank’s group have to hire Lundgrens for. When Jyske bank’s lawyer Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager, knew that Lundgrens had come on as our lawyer. We do not hide anything, and would like to talk about this here, therefore we play with open cards. The question is whether there are some, who can trust the Danish banks as we here provide evidence of operating fraudulent bank, and deliberately lying, and conceal the truth. Yes even to the seat, Jyske Bank board member Philip Baruch is lying at the same time that Lund Elmer Sandager is presenting manipulated evidence to disappoint in legal matters. If we are wrong why no one will talk to us at all. Don’t you see we actually want to have a dialogue with Jyske bank’s board of directors. Call and +4522227713 And let’s meet as adults. And you just have to go through the case with us. If we are wrong then there is nothing we would rather do, than bring the case against Jyske bank for fraud and false. And bring the chase out of court again because we don’t think this is hilarious.

We just have a great desire to dialogue with Jyske Bank A/S. And which Jyske Bank’s board Which probably is just hiding behind Lund Elmer Sandager, and seemed to enjoy political protection against being investigated for fraud.

DETTE ER EN KOPI AF TIDLIGERE FORSIDE der er flyttet herunder.

12-02-2020. AFTER SOON 12 YEARS OF FRAUD, PERFORMED BY THE DANISH BANK JYSKE BANK, CUSTOMERS SAY AGAIN TO THE FRAUD BANK, BY CEO ANDERS DAM, STOP FRAUD. DANISH FRAUD CASE BS 402/2015-VIB COMES TO TRIAL IN 2020. READ ABOUT DOCUMENT FALSE, LYING TO COURT, ABUSED PROXY, AND CORRUPTION IN DENMARK.

The big criminal organizations in Denmark

Again a fun case from Denmark’s largest banks the Danish Bank Jyske Bank, and Lundgrens.

---

Donation to lawyer assistance against Jyske bank A/S for gross fraud

carried out and continued by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors since May 2016

in association. received

IBAN DK0854790004563376.

Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.

 

It is a great thing for legal certainty in Denmark that a Danish bank is allowed by the police to commit crime. Or does the new chief of police or the Minister of Justice have a good explanation, no politicians or authorities will help stop Jyske Bank’s fraud charges against us customers.

 

ER LUNDGRENS KORUPTE

 

Are Lundgren’s lawyers corrupt and is the Danske Bank Jyske bank fraudulent.

Read with and judge if these are Conspiracy theories as Partner Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren’s lawyer partner company claims.

Please read some of the many letters we have sent to Lundgrens, the court and Rørdtenen attorneys since 2016, to present our claims against JYSKE BANK FOR FRAUD AND FALSE.

And read what Lundgrens presents, it is not where we have given Lundgren’s instructions to submit.

If you have any questions then call +4522227713

best regards The Skaarup family from Hornbaek

Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbark

DK. Denmark.

 

Main hearing in large fraud case against JyskeBank 30th of September & October 1 is listed after apparent problems with a corrupt lawyer

Who only 30 days before the main hearing, the court submits the client’s evidence of fraud, and to file client claims.

Or to share the case with the client, need to see a few letters to Lundgren’s lawyers, then you will understand that they are probably corrupt

 

A fraud case that ends up being about bribery in some of Denmark’s largest law firms and Danish banks.

If CEO Ander Christian Dam has another explanation, our number is +4522227713

And wants Jyske Bank’s group management to admit that we are exposed to fraud, and the Board has been aware of this fraud and false at least since May 2016.

 

Lundgren’s attorneys must be visually impaired and more blind to their client.

or even Jyske Bank A/S paid Jyske Bank many millions in return commission, to help cover Jyske Bank’s fraud and false  and disappoint in residual conditions.

         

5479 – 4563376 Nykredit

IBAN DK0854790004563376.

Help us stop the criminal Danish banks.

HJÆLP MIG I AT SAGSØGE JYSKE BANK for Bedrageri, falsk svig

Just see the letter of September 1, 2019. to Lundgren’s lawyers with clear instructions that the case is a fraud, and we claim that Appendix 1.

a swap from 16-07-2008 is false.

And we will summon 9 witnesses.

Compare the Prosecution 2. which Lundgrens submits to the court on September 2, 2019,

And will share some copies with the client. Lundgrens writes in Prosecution 2.

Nothing that the case is presented with allegations of fraud and false.

Lundgrens has removed 7 of the client’s 9th witnesses.

Lundgrens change the client’s claim that Appendix 1. is false, that Appendix 1. the swap is agreed.

And when we fire Lundgrens you will not repay our money.

they Dan terkildsen think they have done a great job, but it must be for the counterparty Jyske Bank A/S.

 

---

 

Then Lundgrens chose to accept a million jobs, offered by Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors, just a few months after, Lundgrens took the assignment against Jyske Bank for fraud and false. We fired Lundgrens 1 year after, when we discovered that Lundgren’s Partner Company real works for Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. And therefore directly in contravention of good lawyer custom, counteract us, and that our claims against Jyske Bank were not presented to the courts. Therefore, we would like to warn you as a client in Lundgrens, as we believe they have received a return commission from Jyske Bank A/S, to help Jyske Bank A/S A false or corrupt lawyer is a threat to the Danish legal community. Click link and read more. If a lawyer counteracts their client as here in the case. Where Lundgren’s attorneys in our fraud case against Jyske Bank A / S directly against “Lundgren’s client” our instructions, we dare to submit our “client’s” claims. And when Lundgrens does the exact opposite of what the client writes Lundgren’s attorneys must do. What, then, is such a law firm called? And if the lawyers like Lundgren’s partner company like this, then also work for the counterparty, which Lundgren’s lawyers have managed to keep hidden from us for over 16 months. Is such a law firm so not corrupt. No matter how much money The board of Jyske Bank A / S has paid Lundgren’s lawyer partner company for their services. And if Lundgren’s lawyers’ cooperation with Jyske Bank has affected Lundgren’s work, in the fraud case against Jyske Bank which was therefore not presented to the court. Whether it is friendly services, between some of Denmark’s largest banks Jyske Bank and the country’s largest law firms Lundgrens. If there is no bribery and corruption then what is it? This happens in Denmark absolute top of society, and these lawyers “Lundgrens” who should ensure that the law is complied with. And so sure that there is legal certainty for the little ones when the Danish police by the Attorney General have denied that Jyske Bank is being investigated. The State Attorney thinks, just like Jyske Bank’s lawyers, Lund Elmer Sandager, who has repeatedly pleaded guilty to lying in legal matters. When the Danes are exposed to fraud, carried out by Denmark’s largest and most powerful companies, and it is reported to the police. But neither the police nor the public prosecutor will speak to the prosecutor who has presented a directory with more evidence of violation of the Criminal Code, and simply reply that the Police do not believe that Jyske Bank A / S will be punished. And then, by the State, the State Attorney is referred to bring a fraud case against Jyske Bank himself. And as now both Rødstenen’s lawyers in Aarhus and Lundgren’s lawyers in Copenhagen directly counteracted were presented to the Danish courts. This is no fun So if there are some in Jyske Bank’s board of directors, or somewhere else who would like to talk to us who have provided some evidence that Jyske Bank is doing fraud, call us if we are wrong. Then we delete immediately, but first as adults we should talk together, instead of sticking your heads in the bush. Did you get the number Anders Christian Dam. Otherwise find the free jersey we sent to you, with pens with advertising for Mobilix The ones with the slogan Conversation promotes understanding. / Remember we are correct with a smile if there are some misunderstandings. It is no way our intention to write anything about Jyske Bank, Lundgrens, Lund Elmer Sandager or others which is not true. Right now you are reading just about our history, about being cheated, getting sick, being threatened to be killed “So it was a former employee” It is about not having to piss on someone who is ill, and press them so they crash, it could be that they did not die even if the odds were that between 40 – 70% die within 5 years, under normal circumstances. CEO Anders Christian Dam As you well know about this diary is only made since no one on Jyske Bank’s board will speak to us. That’s why we write like this just to get air. Regardless of whether nobody from Jyske Bank reads, we hope one day that Jyske Bank’s Group and management will talk to us. Remember even if you laugh at us because you are so powerful, then it is not fun, we say again let’s talk together. Sincerely Storbjerg The Skaarup family Carsten Skaarup Soevej 5 3100 Hornbaek DK Denmark And the phone number is still +4522227713

Don’t hope Jyske Bank, will try to buy our new lawyer by offering work like Jyske Bank bought Lundgrens, 07-02-2020

Jyske Bank’s corporate management at Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt, must be very proud of themselves.

At Jyske Bank A/S being able to buy or bribe the counterparty’s lawyer, Lundgren’s lawyers, to stop a client’s fraud case against Jyske Bank’s group, which the client had just recently employed Lundgren’s lawyers to present to the court.

Which Lundgren’s lawyers have most likely been bribed, not to present to the court, if you have a better explanation, please share it here +4522227713

Lundgrens

Although both Jyske bank, Lund Elmer Sandager and Lundgren’s lawyers probably describe us as rather stupid.

How can Lundgrens otherwise, directly against what we say and write. Submit it to the courts, as if we entered into an Exchange Swap 16-07-2008 when we have repeatedly written the opposite.

That the Appendix 1. is false and that no new interest swap agreement has been made 16-07-2008 between Jyske Bank and the customer.

We repeatedly say that only an agreement has been made between Jyske Bank and customer, and this is Appendix E. page 4 & 5. from 15-07-2008.

Therefore we claim that Appendix 1. is False. but that is not what Lundgrens is submitting to the court, but we have none opportunity to changed it, as Lundgrens has written, statements that directly contradict the client’s fraud claims

We know that there are many spellings and mistakes as the client is dyslexic, but it is so bad that Lundgren’s lawyers cannot read and understand what we have repeatedly written to Lundgrens, and therefore Lundgrens does not respond to anything, very strange , hope you can read and understand what we mean, otherwise just call 004522227713

There are probably 100 letters and mails to Rödstenen Thomas and as many to Lundgren’s attorneys.

Where the client writes to Lundgrens to present their case as fraud, which Lundgren’s attorneys go directly against, and deliberately and dishonestly counteracts the Client’s claims against Jyske Bank for the court.

At no time will the Client be able to make corrections, and Lundgren’s attorneys submit their response papers, without having a single of their client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank, and without securing the Client’s approval.

Lundgren’s lawyers have presented a case of bad counseling.

That’s not what we hired Lundgrens to present, and in case of fraud and fraud there is a 10-year limitation period, from the crime being discovered, by bad counseling there are 3 years.

It really looks a lot Lundgren’s lawyers actually work for Jyske Bank’s group in this case.

Or are Lundgren’s lawyers just corrupt and have been bribed by Jyske Bank’s group.

It is actually a very simple case we have against Jyske Bank.

The law firm of Lundgrens has acted unlawfully, by directly opposing Lundgren’s client.

And not presenting any of the Client’s fraud allegations.

Not summoning the witnesses the Client said should be summoned.

Not presenting the client’s evidence with explanation.

Not sharing the court book with the client.

And so in that Lundgren’s lawyers chose to work for the counterpart, while forgiving that Lundgren’s lawyers work for the client.

Without informing the client that Lundgrens also works for the counterpart Jyske Bank in a large case for millions in fees.

Which is why Lundgrens is incompetent and directly goes against good law practice .

JYSKE BANK

In major Fraud Chase, client discovered that Jyske Bank A/S had paid ther lawyers Lundgrens seems return commission.

It’s all about Jyske Bank’s honesty and credibility

Danes are forced to fight danish Banking group, to stop the Jyske bank’s fraud themselves.

As the danish state attorney does not believe, either

Jyske Bank A/S

Anders Christian Dam CEO

Philip Baruch lawyer

Morten Ulrik Gade lawyer

Will be punished for contributing to Jyske Bank’s continued fraud, supported by the mighty Board of Directors.

Why these advertising cars, have been driving around since 2016, without Jyske bank having a comment, but on the contrary refuse to talk to the customer.

The customer who just, in this funny way, tries to get in dialogue with Jyske Bank Group Board of Directors as Anders Dam.

One of Jyske Bank’s many small cases, but for us it is a matter of principle.

Allows the states danish banks to lie and make fraud ?.

Thinking that the management of Jyske Bank with this case, will show the Danes, that the group does not have to comply with any rules and laws.

And show that no one, should believe they can beat Jyske Bank in court.

Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is the chief executive of the British branch of the Russian energy group Gazprom

Når selv toppen af dansk industri og erhverv er indblandet i at jyske Banks Bedrageri ikke bliver stoppet.

Er det sikkert også grunden til ingen har lyst til at pege finger af Jyske Banks koncernledelse, for medvirken til bankens mange års svigagtighed.

Which has almost half a million employees. Thus, Kurt Bligaard Pedersen is one of the highest-ranking non-Russians in Gazprom.

Since the bank both lies, deceives, bribes to serve the shareholders financial interests, this is what we thought it was.

But when Anders Dam and the others in the group refuse dialogue.

We are desperate and just try to make contact, to ask what the hell the management is doing

If you as a reader in the customer’s diary, how the customer is exposed to fraud in Jyske Bank.If you have any questions about charges against the Jyske Bank Group, or the contents.So contact Carsten S Skaarup on +4522227713As Carsten is a bit words blind, and probably not as clever as the overall board of Jyske Bank.Although Carsten says that Jyske Bank is doing fraud and fake, and has also bought our former Lundgrens lawyers, to work for Jyske Bank, why it must be bribery and corruption.Which we are exposed to here.While the management of Jyske Bank probably just laughs at the customers the bank, seemed rather stupid customers.

The Skaarup family from Hornbaek.Soevej 5.3100 Hornbaek DKSince February 2016 has we written and accused the Jyske Bank group, and the Board of Jyske Bank A/SJyske Bank has not wanted to review the site with us, so the management must agree.

A new member of the Jyske Bank Board of Directors will be Bente Overgaard, who is formerly Executive Vice President of Nykredit Bank

Who owned more than 10% of Jyske Bank A/S, and probably therefore chose to cover Jyske Bank’s Fraud against the bank’s customer.

Sven Buhrkall, who has been on the Board of Directors, at the same time as the bank’s fraud and fraudulent behavior towards small customers, is at the same time completely finished at Jyske Bank

ANDERS DAM JYSKE BANK BREV 18 MAJ 2018 VELKOMMEN BANK NYT. BANKING NEWS

The diary of the one Dane who alone is choosing, alone to go at war, against the second largest and state-supported danish bank Jyske Bank, in order to stop the bank’s fraud against small customers. David against Goliath.

The scandal at Jyske Bank about the massive fraud against the bank’s customer 27-12-2019

The Chase 28-10-2019 BS-402/2015-VIB

Læs det afsluttende svarkrift 28-10-2019

And then ask your self, why the Jyske Bank Group does not appear from the court, in response to the closing reply in the Chase BS-402/2015-VIB

We warn you and the shareholders of Jyske Bank A/S against believing in some of the group, as we have presented more evidence, that the group is continuously lying.

And warn you against the management, which is the main issue for Jyske Bank’s fair credibility.

We look forward to having the fraud and false case against Jyske Bank dealt with in court, without further delay.

Jyske bank probably believes that the rich danish banks should not comply with Danish law.

Read the 40 questions to Anders Dam here.

As they Jyske Bank’s management have the shareholders full support, to violate even the criminal law, which must be the reason.

Why Jyske Bank’s group and CEO Anders Dam is doing, and continues with million fraud against the bank’s customers like us.

A defense statement that Lundgren’s lawyers should make, but our former lawyers Lundgrens.

Who had joined forces with Jyske Bank “call it what you want, we think it is bribery.”

And directly against the client’s instructions, Lundgren’s lawyers withheld all their client’s claims against Jyske Bank, thus they have not been presented to the courts by our lawyers in Lundgrens.

klik and see the FINAL PROCEDURE PAGE 1-52. DATE 28-10-2019. DANISH BANK JYSKE BANK IN MAJOR FRAUD CASE.

Now it is succeed in getting a lawyer as Jyske Bank’s management, can not bribe or buy for another task, if you want another word for payment of return commission.

Which customer thinks Jyske Bank used, when the Group bought Lundgren’s lawyers for another task.

It will hardly be investigated by the Danish police if Jyske Bank reports that it has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers.

Simply see, in a few appendices, what the client’s lawyer Dan Terkildsen from Lundgren’s lawyers would not provide, after Jyske Bank employees Lundgrens

Bribery in Danish companies and banks is openly perpetrated

Just as Danish lawyers deliberately lie to the court, as in our case.

The Danish courts have been informed that Lund Elmer Sandager by Philip Baruch has lied several times in legal matters.

BRIBERY IS NOT ONLY A PROBLEM OF DANISH SOCIETY.

Are you interested in owning one of these advertising cars for Jyske Bank when we replace them. please contact us on 004522227713

Many more pictures of the famous Jyske bank cars will be added

See the cars here. 10-01-2020

BRIBERY IS NOT ONLY A PROBLEM OF DANISH SOCIETY

A New York pension fund is suing Danske Bank and four of its former executives for concealing its money laundering scandal, resulting in an artificial inflation of the bank’s share price.

FINANCIAL CRIME WAVE – DANSKE BANK NAMED YEAR’S ‘MOST CORRUPT ACTOR,’ CORPORATE SCANDALS, AND MORE

World’s biggest money-laundering scandal: the true face of Danish capitalism

PICTURE GALLERY JYSKE BANK.

A tiny customer alone is taking up the fight against Denmark’s second largest Danish bank Jyske Bank.

For more fraudulent relationships with the customer. Anette Kirkeby Jyske Bank Helsingør.

Thank you for ordering “now you have also become a bad customer”

When Anette Kirkeby, after Jyske Bank employees exposed the bank’s customer to several fraud cases, sent the customer to liquidation in 2013, at the green butchers in Jyske Bank Silkeborg, where Birgit Bush Thuesen stood ready.

“As in the night of the long knives”

Thank you to the many employees of Jyske Bank who, for several years, helped the Jyske bank group with the fraud against Jyske Bank’s own customer, several of Jyske Bank’s employees.

Like Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen who have subsequently moved to Jyske Bank’s branch in Hillerød.

Some have been promoted, such as Anette Kirkeby.

Anette Kirkeby started as a student at Jyske Bank on February 1, 1987, and in November 2003 Anette Kirkeby became head of Jyske Bank Erhverv Helsingør.

Anette Kirkeby was the business manager during the period 2008/2009, where Jyske Bank A/S chose to lie, and expose the bank’s small business customer for fraud.

Anette Kirkeby was thus the leader and contributing to the customer being exposed to many years of deliberate fraud.

Anette Kirkeby is for her good management skills?, Subsequently where Anette Kirkeby quit as department manager on 1 February 2014 when Anette Kirkeby is promoted to new department director of the Jyske Bank Group’s branch in Helsingør.

Fake and Fraud.

When Anette Kirkeby in 2013 at a meeting of Jyske Bank, with the client’s lawyer, Anette Kirkeby chooses not to inform the bank’s client or lawyer that the client has never taken out the loan 4.328.000 dkk for.

Which Jyske Bank has claimed and the bank has taken collateral and commission.

Anette Kirkeby has fully lived up to Jyske Bank’s foundation, and has now become chief executive of the group’s Helsingør division.

A big congratulations to Jyske Bank’s group management, which chooses to run the dishonest Danish bank Jyske Bank.

Where the group’s management team, at least since May 2016, has struggled to deceive Jyske Bank’s customers, rather than admit fraud, and stop the bank’s continuing fraud.

Welcome to Jyske Bank, a different and dishonest Bank, here the Bank’s clients must find themselves in Jyske Bank also buys the lawyers who hire clients to present the group’s fraud crimes, in order to stop Jyske Bank fraud.

The task of the danish police, is to maintain security, peace and order – to monitor compliance with the laws and to intervene in criminal investigations and prosecutions, but in Denmark this does not happen when the fraud is carried out by the Danish state aid banks

The Danske Bank Jyske Bank in Denmark

Jyske Bank Helsingor, where the fraud against the bank’s customer began back in 2008/2009 and with the help of Jyske Bank’s branch at Vesterbrogade in Copenhagen

Lundgren’s got a million deal with Jyske Bank And then counter that Lundgren’s client’s claims against Jyske Bank were not presented in court.

If this is not a bribe then what is it?

The question is also whether Lundgren’s lawyers have helped Jyske Bank to continue the Bank’s Fraud against Business by having Lundgren’s lawyers directly opposing their client, after Lundgren’s lawyers were employed by Jyske Bank’s group.

01-07-2019 HOW MANY CUSTOMERS BEYOND US AMOUNTS JYSKE BANK FOR FRAUD

/

OPERATES THE SECOND LARGEST DANSKE BANK JYSKE BANK COMMUNITY’S HARMFUL BANKING BUSINESS.

THIS IS THE QUESTION FOR CEO ANDERS DAM JYSKE BANK

TRUSTING DANISH LAWYERS AND TRUSTING DANISH BANKS

WHAT IS WRONG IN DENMARK

A case concerning the credibility of the Danish banks, and that a customer has even submitted to the court that Jyske Bank A/S. By the Group management is behind a million fraud against a small Danish company.

The Danish bank Jyske Bank is fully aware that the Group is fraudulent towards its customer.

But now that the group management has December 20, 2019. our new lawyer has stated that the group does not want to meet as adults and talk together.

So, of course, we hope that Jyske Bank in the future will not use dirty tricks to cover up our now-presented claims against Jyske Bank and also against Jyske Bank's management for contributing to the bank's continued fraudulent conduct.

Probably we have only one lawyer, he alone, with the plaintiff, going against an organization that seems to work directly against not only against good practice, but also directly violated several of the penal provisions of the law.

Of course, we accept the decision of the group and the board that we will fight in the Danish courts.

We stick to actual conditions done according to the timeline

So when we meet for a main negotiation, we will review what the Jyske Bank Group has exposed us to, and which the overall group still exposes us, ie their customer.

Here we again ask if the Jyske Bank Group will not reconsider whether the Bank will not neglect to expose our customers to fraud.

Or at least answer us, tell us why the Jyske Bank Group is constantly lying, and is completely dishonest.

Because we do not lie about Jyske Bank's board when we write they contribute to our being exposed to fraud, regardless of whether Lundgrens did not think the management of the group has any responsibility here in the case.

Anders Christian Dam is still welcome to call us on +4522227713

Even if Anders Dam has just seen something on BANKNYT that the group thinks is untrue, we should probably correct any mistakes, just in rings, instead of sticking our heads in the bush, and continue to hide behind Lund Elmer Sandager, who dare not meet either with us.

Jyske Bank even deletes bad reviews on Trustpilot to remove focus on the bank’s crime against their customers. We have received a Danish copy 27-12-2019 where the danish bank itself writes, that Jyske Bank is a completely reputable bank. In this connection we invite you to the main negotiation in Viborg court, then you can get confirmed and proved that Jyske Bank is a Unscrupulous, and Lying bank.

Diary of the crimes against small customers. Which Jyske Bank’s corporate management is all aware of, and which the board of directors has at least since May 2016, been continuously informed that the Jyske Bank Group is behind. And which Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors also has longer refusing to stop, Jyske Bank’s board of directors ensures that the bank’s exploitation and fraud against customers is continued in the association.

Dagbogen om de forbrydelser mod lille kunde, som koncenledelsen i Jyske Bank, alle er bevidste om banken står bag. Og som bestyrelsen mindst siden maj 2016, løbende er blevet informeret og oplyst om. At Jyske Bank koncernen står bag bevidst svig mod kunde. Svig som Jyske Banks bestyrelse ligeså længere, har nægtet at standse, Jyske Banks bestyrelse sørger for at bankens udnyttelse og svindel mod Bank kunde fortsættes, og at dette sker sammen med ledelsen, altså Svig forretninger udføres i forening.

Anders Christian Dam tells the newspaper BT. in 2016 That if Jyske Bank makes mistakes, the bank immediately corrects, ie then the management in 2019, and Jyske Bank after 3 years still exposes the customer to fraud, then there are no errors.

Danish BANKS.

Jyske bank wants to fight against all customers, who want to try, to stop Jyske bank from deceiving them. Don’t think you are anything, when you have to fight against an apparent criminal organization like Jyske bank, then you are up against a monster institution.

The customer here just says to President Anders Dam call then and admit that you are behind the scams against us. Our number is +4522227713 Call us, Anders Dam if you dare.

No one should doubt that the customer is only trying to enter into dialogue with the group management. But Anders Dam does not care, Jyske bank only does what it usually does, and that is to make money, and that others then suffer a loss as a result of Jyske bank fraud, it is obviously the bank’s foundation.

We joust ask Henrik Høpner, from the Lund Elmer Sander lawyer whether it is okay that the company LES.dk He is a partner in Lund Elmer Sandager. And Lund Elmer Sandager is lying to the court, and this is to cover that Jyske bank, exposes the bank’s customers to Fraud and False. Whether it’s okay, that Jyske Bank, through their lawyers in Lund Elmer Sandager, is lying in legal matters, or not. Then dialogue would be the most natural way to find out.

Warning

Don’t trust Jyske Bank Silkeborg.

Stol ikke på jyske bank, en bank i Jylland Silkeborg, hvor bestyrelsen står bag bankens massive svindel mod kunde, er blevet forsat i flere år. Og det efter ledelsen er blevet oplyst om Jyske Banks bedrageri, som ved at have løjet over for kunde, at have løjet over for retten, at have forfalsket bilag, ved at rette i ægte dokumenter, ved at have misbrugt udløbet fuldmagt, og meget mere.

Denne sag handler om jyske bank og hvordan bankens konsernledelse i Jyske bank står bag masivt svindel af bankens kunde, så enkelt kan det forklares. Ledelsen er flere gange blevet opfordret til at mødes med kunde, og gennemgå dokumenter der viser hvordan Jyske banks svindel af bankens kunde kunne lykkes.

Følg sagen i retten BS-4025/2015-VIB Hvorfor mon kunden har måtte fryer de tidligre Lundgrens Advokater Hvis ikke det er efter mistanke, for at være blevet bestukket af Jyske bank, til ikke at fremlægge nogle af kundens påstande mod Jyske bank for svindel, eller groft svig som det er fremlagt 28-10-2019. En fejl. næppe. kom med ind i retten Viborg Og hør CEO Anders Christian Dam og Bestyrelsesmedlem Philip Baruch, forklare sig i retten.

Kunden der i Jyske bank er udsat for bedrageriet, vil i retten dokumentere at det er sådan Jyske bank koncernen arbejder. Det er Koncernledelsens medlem Philip Baruch som personlig står bag flere løgne i rettsforhold, der 20 december oplyser vores nye advokat, at den øvrige koncernledelse bag det fortsatte svig mod bankens kunde, som oplyser at Jyske bank koncernen nægter dialog. FØLG KRIGEN MOD JYSKE BANKS SVINDEL I RETTEN. En sag om Jyske Banks og deres ledelses troværdighed.

Jyske Bank koncern er alle opfordret til at forklare sig, og hvis der står noget banken ikke er enig i, så ring +4522227713 og oplys hvad, såleds vi kan rette op. Der er ingen der ønsker at beskylde Jyske bank for svindel, hvis det ikke er sandt.

Don't rely on Jyske Bank, a bank in Jutland Silkeborg, where the Board of Directors is behind the bank's massive fraud against customers, has been continued for several years, and after management has been informed of Jyske Bank's fraud, which by lying to the customer, to have lied to the court, to have falsified documents, to correct genuine documents, to have abused the expired power of attorney, and more.
  
This case is about Jyske bank and how the bank's corporate management in Jyske bank is behind massive fraud by the bank's customer, so that can easily be explained.
  
Management has been called several times to meet with a customer, and to review documents showing how Jyske Bank's fraud by the bank's customer could succeed.
  
Follow the case in court BS-4025/2015-VIB
the client has had to free the earlier Lundgren's Attorneys, on suspicion of having been bribed by Jyske bank, not to submit any of the client's claims against Jyske bank for fraud, or gross fraud as presented.
  
A mistake. barely.
joined the court in Viborg and heard CEO Anders Christian Dam and Board member Philip Baruch explain in court.
  
The customer who is exposed to the fraud in Jyske bank will document in court that this is how the Jyske bank group works.
   
It is Group Management member Philip Baruch who personally is behind several lies in legal matters that on December 20 informs our new lawyer that the other group management behind the ongoing fraud against the bank's customer, who states that the Jyske bank group refuses dialogue.
  
THEREFORE, THE WAR IS TAKEN AGAINST THE BANK'S SCAM.
   
The Jyske Bank Group is all invited to explain, and if there is anything the bank does not agree with, call +4522227713 and state what, so we can rectify.
  
No one wants to accuse Jyske bank of fraud if it is not true.

This case is about the credibility of Danish banks

Jyske bank still has not responded to customer complaints against Jyske Bank A / S and Group management for contributing to serious fraud carried out in association, which the customer submitted on October 28

Warning against the Danish bank Jyske Bank Denmark’s probably largest criminal bank, Jyske Bank has chosen not to respond, and has not responded to the allegations made by the Danish bank against the exploitation of false and gross fraud by 28-10-2019

Our lawyer, in a summary presentation, will review what Jyske Bank has done with illegalities and when the bank has committed fraud in which Jyske Bank has lied to the court, together with an updated timeline.

Lund Elmer Sandager was given a deadline until December 11 . 2019 To answer in Jyske Bank’s closing reply, we have not received it 18 December, and therefore do not know what Jyske bank has responded to our closing reply of October 28, 2019. As soon as we know more we will share .

Would you choose a Danish bank to do business with, if you showed the Danish police will not investigate the Danish banks, for reported fraud and false against the bank’s customers, and that this is supported by the Danish State Attorney.

Vedtægter Jyske Bank A/S Danmark.

§ 1 Stk. 1: Bankens navn er Jyske Bank A/S.

Stk. 4: Bankens formål er som bank og som moderselskab at drive bankvirksomhed efter lovgivningen

– Men overholder Jyske Bank Loven eller EJ, det er det store spørgsmål. –

In this case, you must note the bank’s own statutes, which is comply with the danish law, which the danish bank REFUSES. When neither the police or the State Prosecutor will help, and several others cover Jyske Bank false and fraud agents the Customer.

Then we must fight, as best we can, if you want to help us stop the criminal Danish banks, can you call and say something to the bad guys in this Jyske Bank. Tell us, if we are stupid and need to correct. –

Vedtægter Jyske Bank A/S fortsat. Stk. 5: Banken drives i overensstemmelse med redelig forretningsskik, god bankpraksis og bankens værdier og holdninger.

– Hvad betyder det ? Hvis vi er udsat for svindel, SVIG. og det sker med ledelsens viden og accept, er det så Jyske banks holdninger at bedrage bankens kunder, og fortsætte med at bedrage kunder, sammen i forening. ?

Customer claims that Jyske Bank is fraudulent, and that the bank continues fraudulently so that the customer cannot afford to stop the bank’s fraud.

Bestyrelsen i Jyske bank #Koncernbestyrelsen #SvenBuhrkall #KurtBligaardPedersen #RinaAsmussen #PhilipBaruch #JensABorup #KeldNorup #ChristinaLykkeMunk #HaggaiKunisch #MarianneLillevang #Koncerndirektionen #AndersDam #LeifFLarsen #NielsErikJakobsen #PerSkovhus #PeterSchleidt

Since Jyske bank has bought and paid for our former lawyer to work for Jyske bank. Have we not really have a lawyer until November 2019. And when Jyske bank writes October 30, and asking the court, to disregard the client’s presented fraud and false allegations October 28 against Jyske Bank, to demand attorney’s injunction.

Surely so that Jyske Bank could again buy the new lawyer, not to submit fraud allegations, that is the very foundation of Jyske bank. Do you have another explanation ?. But this time the client in Jyske Bank has found a lawyer who is not corrupt and who has promised to bring the client’s case against Jyske bank and that according to the client’s own allegations from 28-10-2019.

Share our call for help, but just for your information some have been blocked BANKNYT.dk on facebook. Perhaps to cover the Danish criminal banks, and to hide the truth that Danish police will not investigate the Danish banks, that are reported for Fraud and Document Fake.

What is most illegal for banks. FIND JYSKE BANK Money laundering. Fraud. Document forgery. Exploitation. Maybe bribery.

Some of this and more, are Danish customers, in the Danish bank like Jyske bank exposed to. If you do not believe it, ask Jyske Bank +4589898989 they are allowed to answer you. The case is in the district court under case no. BS-402/2015-VIB

For the first time since we asked February 2016, the earlier lawyer to present our allegations against Jyske Bank, here we ourselves had to submit them October 28, 2019. You are also welcome to ask plaintiff +4522227713 And if you find anything, that may be wrong. Tell us and we correct it immediately.

We have found a new lawyer, who is not corrupt, and would like to present the client’s claims against Jyske bank. Letters dealing with the case against Jyske Bank for fraud. Covers allegations and evidence against Jyske Bank, in case BS-402/2015-VIB. as Jyske Bank in several ways, has tried to prevent was presented in court.

– When our claims document is made, after our closing petition of 28-10-2019, will we share letters from these links. LETTER LUNDGRENS. Do you dare to trust Lundgrens lawyers, if the lawyers are corrupt ?. And cover the Jyske Banking fraud. ?.

LETTER RØDSTENEN.

LETTER LUND ELMER SANDAGER. Do you dare to trust Lund Elmer Sandager lawyer, if the lawyers are lying in legal relationships ?. And cover the Jyske Banking fraud. ?.

LETTER JYSKE BANK. Management and CEO Anders Dam. Do you dare to trust Jyske bank if, the Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors is lying in legal matters, to disappoint in legal matters. ?

LETTERS TO THE COURT IN VIBORG. Including appendix 28-101. Which we ourselves have tried to present on 28-12-2018

See Appendix 164. Letter to the court 2. September 2019. See Appendix her

The journal Danish banks such as Jyske Bank have major problems in complying, with the law. Can Danish lawyers be bribed.

Click and see more at Banknyt.dk Read our claims BS-402/2015-VIB.

Which after 2 lawyers Redstone Rødstenen in AArhus and Lundgrens in Copenhagen. Would not present the chase to court, but as the Customer himself after 43 months here 28-10-2019 presents for the court.

You are probably wondering, why this page about Danish banks is made ?. THE ANSWER IS. This is a call to the big Danish banks, to not lying at their customers. With a view to getting an unreported income to the bank.

A loss from the customer, who becomes a income to shareholders, who actually own the banks. An income that becomes a crucial asset loss for the customer. In Danish it is fraud. We know that the large Danish pension funds, own large shares of the Danish banks, such as ATP. And these act just like Blakstone. Which the danish government has so much against.

But the problem with the pension funds, is they don’t care how their wealth increases. We already know that banks such as Jyske Bank, which in their cases succeed in calling cases for bad advice. And that the bank then chases limitation which is only 3 years. This is a socially big Danish problem. As the Danish banks do everything they can, to ensure that their clients do not discover that they are subject to deliberate bad advice. At least not until after 3 years have passed, and here is where the banks chase the obsolescence. As banks like here, in the case mentioned Jyske bank, seemed to speculate on getting all their obsolete. IS THAT IS A PROBLEM In order to secure Danish banking customers. The parliament is forced to change the statute of limitations to the banks. The statute of limitations on the Danish banks, must be up to at least 5 years, if not 10 years. If this does not happen, the banks like here Jyske bank Will not change their business methods. As our case BS 402/2015-VIB is a good example of. The law of good custom must also be changed. So that it becomes a law that is punishable by transgression. If you look at the Danish bank cases, and judgments in through, from Danish banks like Jyske Bank Will you be able to read that Jyske bank does a lot of telling in court, they do not have to comply with good practice. As it does not have any consequence to violate good practice rules for banks. If the statute of limitations was, at least 5 to 10 years. And good customary law made. Wild cases like the hedge case, swap cases and many more cases, for many hundreds of millions hardly to be found. But now the law, is as it is. If the state parliament, wants to help the banks, then the law should not be changed with lying to their customers either. And then the banks won’t change. In our case. We have found that banks, like Jyske Bank do not care about the law. And probably have violated most of the law before crimes. Remember, since 2016 we have been running around with advertisements, about the case. And wrote about it in the diary banknyt.dk here. Jyske Bank has been fully involved in Banknyt Since October 13, 2016. And Lundgrens has been doing it. Since April 16, 2018. But they will not realize there is something wrong with their businesses. But that we as a client also experience, Jyske Bank bribing our lawyers, not to present the client’s case, to the court. Is an extension, and this was not expected. The case that the customer himself has to present the court. Is that the customer accuses, Jyske bank of fraud. And now also bribery, in the form of return commission. You can read this in the allegation document from 28-10-2019. We share our closing response from 28-10-2019 here. Try and compare our response, with the Lundgrens delivered 18-12-2018 Look at the bottom of the page, banknyt.dk And ask Lundgrens and Jyske bank. If they have been some payment, for not submitting the client’s claims, to the court See Banknyt.dk  bank news See Nyforsikring.dk  new insurance See Nyadvokat.dk  new lawyer See Rignu.dk  rich now See Hurtigrig.dk  fast rich And no this is not fun. We try to get the management of Jyske Bank to apologize and apologize. But not least to admit, it is just not okay, to cheat and deceive its customers. And that it happens with the management behind, as in association. The management has decided to continue the Jyske bank’s fraud. What can we do when the Danish police will not investigate Jyske Bank for fraud against our customers. Police chase 0100-83966-00085 Ask yourself about, is Jyske Bank an honest, fair, and reputable, Danish bank ?. Or is there something about the talk of Danish Banks being dishonest ?. And uses Danish banks to bribe, and lie in legal matters, to disappoint in legal matters. We only ask because it seems to be a FACT. – Or do you have an explanation. Why the client here, must both fight against their own bank Jyske Bank. And also have to fight with their own lawyer. Who directly work against their own client. In a case that is about being honest, and honorable. And what about the great Danish law firms, like Lundgrens. Have these lawyers acted as a reputable law firm ?. We will continuously share all attachments on, among other things, diary since bank new “Banknyt.dk” And now remember this diary, is due to the overall board of Jyske Bank. It is the full responsibility of the Board of Directors that we are exposed to fraud, and who do not want dialogue, and that is why we are exposed to fraud today. We do not want the case, but we are up against Denmark’s second largest bank, which has a different view of good banking. While we are still trying to meet the bank Group President CEO Anders Christian Dam, for an explanation Lundgren’s lawyers, Dan Terkildsen, have said on their office, 13-08-2019 That Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors has no responsibility. We believe that Lundgrens, has only manipulated with us, not to present our claims, so that with the Jyske Bank Board of Directors having no responsibility for Jyske Bank’s fraud, we do not agree WE WANT DIALOGUE And, therefore, again asks the chief executive CEO Anders Dam to re-examine the matter Isn’t something wrong If Jyske Bank did not make money in the pants, then of course we have to pay Jyske bank their money. But that we have to be exposed to this is outright evil. Dear all of you at Jyske bank. Lund Elmer Sandager. Now read the letters we have sent since the beginning of the case. And see if there is something completely wrong. CALL US +4522227713 This is not written in a bad sense. But only like a breath of fresh air, to research your business for the way you make money. From here the very best regards, to the Group Board of Jyske Bank Denmark. Storbjerg Erhverv Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek Danmark +4522227713 Hope this soon becomes a forgotten cause and we together can laugh at it. so look forward.

WHAT HAVE WE DONE THE DANISH BANK. SINCE THE JYSKE BANK EXPOSING US FOR FRAUD. WHAT HAVE WE DONE TO THE BANK. SINCE JYSKE BANK IS LYING TO THE COURT. WHAT HAVE WE DONE THE BANK. SINCE JYSKE BANK, HAS BOUGHT OUR LAWYER, TO WORK AGAINST US, AS THEIR OWN CLIENT. WE DON’T KNOW THEY WILL NOT TALK TO US MAYBE YOU CAN EXPLAIN US WHAT HAPPENS TO JYSKE BANK.

This is a call. Help us get the Danish Bank Jyske bank not to expose us to more FRAUD, we do not know why the bank is fraudulently against us, and they will not stop, what should we do, our last 2 lawyers, have the bank, reasonably bribed not to present our claims to the court. help us, seen a lot of rubbish in the Danish banks, money laundering and fraud in large style. Danish banking news banknyt.dk

This is our diary.

If you want to help us stop the Danish bank’s Jyske Bank scam against us, then please donate a small contribution to our account, for lawyer assistance.

Either Jyske Bank's corporate management is deeply criminal, and wants Jyske bank to be a criminal organ institution, or they have not even discovered we are trying Jyske bank should just spot us, and realize that Fraud against the bank's own customers is a bad thing.

Remember this is not a bad announcement, but you know very well that we just want us to go through the case together, because it may not be true that Jyske Bank has paid our 2 most recent lawyers Rødstenen to try to close the case behind our back, and Lundgrens and Rødstenen for not presenting some of our allegations against Jyske Bank for Fraud and False.

It must certainly be an evil dream, and we are part of a Danish criminal history that has not been seen before.

REMEMBER
THERE MUST BE 2 FOR TANGO

Anders Christian Dam should we not meet and talk about this here, then it can not be true that Jyske bank's group management really wants to deceive their clients, and lie to the court, and then just bribe the client's lawyers, it does not fit? Well CEO Anders Dam Jyske Bank

Do we have reason to believe the Jyske Bank Group has paid bribes to Lundgren’s lawyers ?.

And that Lundgren’s lawyers have accepted this bribe, in the form of a return commission, for not submitting client’s claims against Jyske Bank for million Fraud and False

And do we have reason to believe that Jyske bank paid our lawyer LUNDGRENS, to disappoint in legal matters, by not presenting the client’s claims to the court.

Just as Jyske Bank’s board member Philip Baruch of Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys has “lied” or written untrue to the court, and that this has also happened to disappoint in legal matters.

Or is it normal that the big Danish banks and large law firms, in fact, lie and deceive the Danish society in order to earn an unjustified income, which will be a loss to their own clients

Read more about Lundgren’s lawyers and the danish bank Jyske bank here. And answer us if we have reason to believe that Lundgrens is corrupt, or we have a lively imagination, we have until now had to fight all alone, against a big fraud bank, we believe that Jyske Bank has outbid Lundgrens, to counteract our fraud case, was not presented to the court, and we therefore had to play a lawyer ourselves, just laugh at us and think we are stupid, but this is too gross and then it is claimed that Denmark is the least corrupt country, so it does not look good in the more corrupt countries. If Jyske Group Management at Jyske Bank looks back at what we have sent to the Board of Directors and AndersDam since 2016, then you can not understand it is just dialogue we try

Read sms tekst for Emil Lundgrens

Hvad er bestikkelse for en grim ting, når vi mistænker Jyske Bank for at bruge bestikkelse, til at få Lundgrens til ikke at fremlægge klientens påstande. Så klik på teksten og lær

Jyske Bank bribes the plaintiff’s lawyers, in a fraud case against the same Jyske Bank.

This is how the fraudulent customer at Jyske bank perceives the management’s actions. / Jyske Banks lawyers Lund Elmer Sandager who is lying in court for trial. Management, including Director Anders Dam, has been known about the fraud and fake in Jyske Bank since May 2016. See www. NY ADVOKAT.dk.

Jyskebank refusing to stop ther cheating against the customers.

Read more about Lundgrens at www.NYADVOKAT.dk klik

Denmark's perhaps biggest banking scandal during escalation.

Dear Lundgren's lawyers are deeply involved in Jyske Bank fraud, against small business has not been stopped.

You can call +45 22227713 and get all the information ,? but they already have :-)

-

But what do you Lundgrens think about our allegations and evidence against Jyske BANK about the fraud chase.

Dan Terkildsen said August 13 that the Board was not guilty of anything, but he will or have not comment on of our claims
? That is very strange ?

:-)

After being discovered at Lundgrens, is working for Jyske bank, and you were fired, 25 SEPTEMBER.

We asked you to send our material back to Hornbaek, the material has not been received.

Please send it by GLS to Shell Hornbaek.

Incidentally, Lundgren's attorneys should not contact our new attorney, as he Lundgrens is an Inhabian, and you have done enough harm.

We also asked you to pay back, the money we paid to Lundgrens.

Your partner Dan Terkildsen has denied to pay is back, he believes that Lundgren's lawyers have done a great job for us, but the fact is that Lundgren's has directly cost us far more off time.

So you should consider, whether you should not have anything on top of it, and in this way competencies fore that we could have lost the case due to Lundgren's lawyers.

But now we're writing this on the site, so many others in Lundgrens can reading it.

/

We are a customer of Jyske Bank, you have our account number.

USE IT.

/

But now you still work for Jyske Bank

Would you like to tell the group management Anders Dam, that we do not want to be deceived.

We want to meet and have no interest in writing anything untrue.

After all, the question is whether we are right and can prove we are right.

What does Lundgrens mean? you never told us that.

Feel free to leave a comment on Facebook, Twitter for updates.

Best regards from
Storbjerg Business

Soevej 5
3100 Hornbaek

To those who trust that Denmark is not a corrupt country.

The question is more how many people in Denmark use bribery or corruption to achieve something, like here to keep a case of millions fraud out of court.

Only after 44 months of continuous work, probably 3,000 hours of work, do we succeed in getting our claims against Jyske Bank presented to the court

As we only after, we ourselves have made sure to present the client’s fraud claim against Jyske Bank, in the Danish courts.

Then our new lawyer takes over and makes the new allegation, with a whole lot of new allegations.

What we have asked for presented since 2016.

So not new allegations, but just a whole lot of allegations that our now fired lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers refused to submit, as their cooperation with Jyske Bank did not allow a fraud case

Against the same Jyske Bank.

Then we got a new lawyer on the case, and looked at the annexes. A customer of Jyske Bank does not understand why Anders Christian Dam will not just meet. – – A customer of the Danish fraud bank, in connection with the firing of their lawyers Lundgrens, for apparently having received a bribe from Jyske Bank. Maybe directly by CEO Anders Dam for not presenting the client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank A / S. The Danish courts have announced this is why Lundgren’s lawyers are retiring. In Danish, has been fired. – Which Jyske Bank Board member Philip Baruch, by Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater has rejected should have happened. / Lundgren’s lawyers have commented that these disqualification issues are purely conspiracy theories, and have nothing on them. Whether Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen himself should be called as a witness. And the court can explain why Lundgren’s lawyers have not presented the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank for fraud and fraud, while Lundgren’s lawyers. Presumably by Jyske Bank has been given Lundgrens around 15-20 million Danish kroner to give Jyske Bank advice. Which could provide a better illumination of Lundgren’s moving grounds, to thwart their small client.

Who now for a third time must have a new lawyer. / Since Jyske Bank has strongly distanced itself from possibly having used a return commission, or a bribe in the case, in order that the applicant’s claims against Jyske Bank should not be presented i court. The plaintiff has therefore just 1. November submitted an Appendix 168. Becomes 168.A in the case The annex is from Lundgren’s website, where they write that Lundgrens has advised Jyske Bank, in a transaction for a three-digit million amount, in Danish kroner. “More precisely about 600 million Danish kroner.” / After the fraudulent exposed client in Jyske Bank has met with their new lawyer. And that has gone through the case, and is confirmed in the fact that these are not conspiracy theories, but that they are facts. The client tells their new lawyer that they are actually satisfied that Jyske Bank is convicted of fraud and forgery false. Following the allegations which the plaintiff himself had to make in the closing plea, which Lundgrens was certainly paid not to present. – Clearly, the plaintiff would have included the seriousness of Jyske Bank, in all likelihood, bribing the plaintiff’s lawyer, not to present the client’s fraud allegations against the defendant danish bank Jyske Bank. / Prosecutions directed directly at the bank’s overall Board of Directors to stand together in association with, the Jyske Bank Group’s continued and very serious failure business against the bank’s customer. / The plaintiff also states that in three submitted letters from 2018, the group management is all offered that they could actually discharge their mandate. Know that the board members who chose to sign Jyske Bank has been exposed to fraud for a number of years and will no longer be contributing to Jyske Bank causing fraud, the members could sign and return the letter to the applicant. – By signing, the members of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors could be exempt from liability. It is stated that not a single member of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors / Group Management has wanted to stop the fraud against the bank’s customer. / That with the inner circle in Jyske Bank by CEO Anders Christian Dam, seems to have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, through the use of a return commission. The applicant’s allegations against Jyske Bank appear to be corroborated only as true charges. – When Jyske Bank is ready to lie in the court itself, by Lund Elmer Sandager and in this case has lied to the court, to want to disappoint in legal matters, and then to continue deceive the bank’s customer. / / CEO Anders Christian Dam CALL NOW 0045 22227713 This is a continuing hand, which since May 2016 has been hould out against Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors. And most be especially clear to you Anders Dam. – If you have found something that does not fit, then let’s meet and review the evidence, tell us which places Jyske Bank disagrees with the dokumation. If there is anything about Jyske bank and the management says that is untrue? Should we then not meet, and at the same time get the places that have been written accusations against Jyske Bank if there is no team in any of the accusations. – This small matter, Jyske Bank’s foundation emphasizes, and running a fair banking business is not part of the board’s wishes. If we are wrong, we ask the Jyske Bank Group Management for dialogue. Anders Dam old boy, call now at +45 22227713

And let’s meet, we’re a little tired of one-way communication, after all, it takes 2 to have a dialogue. / / The applicant states that they would still like to receive the court’s offer of litigation. Which Jyske Bank has shown no desire. / That the plaintiff has repeatedly asked the management of the continuing fraud to meet, no one can doubt, therefore we would like to repeat Jyske Bank is welcome Just call. Show that Jyske Bank is an open and reputable bank Show that Jyske Bank is a fair and honest bank. IT SHOULD NOT BE SO DIFFICULT. / / In Denmark it is David against Goliath Thus, the largest Danish banks do business. And all customers are as vulnerable as we are, the question is just who will be the next victim of Danish bank fraud. Remember this here is all our thoughts in an open diary. / / The plaintiff’s new attorney has obtained a copy of the closing plea of ​​August 28, 2019. The plaintiff, who is poor at writing, and probably also slightly dyslexic, has stated that there are some typos and corrects these errors to the best of his ability. But as a starting point, the lawsuit contains the allegations that Rødstenen’s lawyers and Lundgren’s lawyers have countered were presented. Whether Lundgren’s lawyers saw Jyske Bank’s Group Management been honored for helping Jyske Bank keep the fraud case out of court by continuing a case of bad advice. You can think about for a bit of time. / Jyske Bank can be contacted here +45 89898989 the company Storbjerg Business Soevej 5. 3100. Hornbaek Denmark Phone 0045 22227713

/

When it comes to Danish banks, it’s about cheating their customers as much as possible, and banks like Jyske Bank go so far as to expose customers to fraud. Then it is only a moment before some customer finds evidence that the Danish bank Jyske Bank is going really far for their shareholders. We can mention here a few of them, Nykredit, Codan, ATP. Atp’s board of directors does not mind Jyske bank exposing customers to fraud, and will not interfere.

/

Falou the small players fight against the evael big danish bank Jyske Bank at www Banknyt dk

Being a customer of a large Dansk Bank can pose a greater financial risk.

Therefore, you have to be very careful about trusting the Danish banks.

If there is anything you cannot understand then call 0045 22227713

/

Here we tell just about one simple little case.

A case is likely to have hundreds of similar cases, like the fraud case here

That the Danish police do not care that Danish banks, like here Jyske Bank exposes customers to fraud, is not very lucky.

But this time, a customer has resigned, asking Jyske Bank to stop their continued criminal activities.

As the fraud the small Danish customer is exposed to in Jyske Bank.

/

When Danish banks like Jyske Bank deceive customers, and it happened openly without the Danish authorities intervening, it is very unfortunate, and frankly, for the trust in Denmark.

/

Has Jyske Bank bought and paid more than the applicant's lawyer, from Lundgren's lawyers.

Maybe a stupid question, but if Jyske Bank is not behind the bribery of a client's lawyer.

?

:-)

If the great Danish lawyer company Lundgren's lawyers.

Has a good explanation as to why the lawyers have not presented the plaintiff's allegations against Jyske Bank for fraud and fraud

Then the former client would like to hear Lundgren's lake explanations.

You have our number
+45 22227713

 /

With this, Jyske Bank's return problem, with the bank's credibility.

Then the big Danish money laundering cases appeared to pale in the face of Denmark's second largest bank fraud.

/

Other customers who believe they are also at risk of fraud are calling to come forward and help stop the criminal Danish banks.

As the plaintiff in the case against Jyske Bank A / S says, do not be a customer of Jyske Bank and get sick, so the bank will fuck you.

/

The customer's former lawyer from Lundgrens, received in February 2019 a letter from Jyske Bank through the Danish courts.

Here, Lund Elmer Sandager writes that the plaintiff commits criminal acts by sharing more evidence on Banknyt dk.

And explain that all charges against Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys and against the management of Jyske Bank are groundless

But why didn't the Board call the plaintiff?

Afsluttende processkrift 28-10-2019

Customer catches the BIG Danish bank “Jyskebank” in a million scams.

You probably already know that several Danish banks, have made money laundering for billions. And that the Danish state first ruled on money laundering, after the criminal activities, through the press now was published. And and after Estonia, asked a large Danish bank, to close their banking business in the country.

/

Most of our post about criminal Danish banks, it is written in Danish, but further down on BANKNYT.dk Have we tried in English to explain, how banks in Denmark, through corporate management, do and continue to make fraud.

/

We are trying to explain about, Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank, and that it is the board of directors ther continue ther fraud themselves.

That is the board members ther is behind the bank’s  fraud and exploitation of their customers themselves.

We is refer to ourselves, if you have any questions, please call us at.

0045 22227713

If you have any questions for the Danish bank, you can call them at.

0045 89898989

The Chase BS 402/2015-VIB

VIBORG

The bank directions CEO Anders Christian Dam respond again.

After the bank customer, and client asks their lawyer, Lundgrens Dan Terkelsen, to present the client’s claims that Jyske Bank is doing fraudulent transactions.

/

And after that the bank has learned about the new lawyer, Jyske Bank even themselves contacts the client’s Attorney.

And offers the client’s attorneys Lundgrens a large million task.

And the Danish bank jyske bank, enter into a million agreement, with the client’s attorney’s Lundgrens lawyer. And afterwards, will the lawyer company Lundgrens, not present any of the client’s claims off fraud to the courts.

The client thinks therefore the bank Jyske bank, have bribed, their lawyers from the firm of Lundgren’s lawyers, not to present the client’s allegations, and evidence to the danish court.

In all ways, since May 2016, we have been trying to get management I Jyske Bank to talk to us. Unfortunately, the Danish bank Jyske Bank is determined, that the members who are together in the association, would rather continue the bank’s million-dollar fraud. Rather than talking to the deceived customers who question the credibility of the Danish bank.

/

The Danish police have refused to investigate Danich Banks ass Jyske Bank for fraud, and now there is also suspected corruption, or bribery, if you want to call Corruption for bribery.

/

You can ask yourself if Jyske bank is the only Danish bank doing fraudulent transactions. or whether corruption is more widespread in Denmark than our case suggests.

/

Since we have had to fire Lundgren’s lawyers, for directly to go against our case, against Jyske Bank.

And that nothing from the fraud case has been presented to the court.

And therefore, 43 months after the scam was discovered, we still have not made any of our claims we must therefore again have a new lawyer.

This time, we take one that Jyske Bank Group Management cannot bribe, with offers to take work for Jyske Bank, what we call the return commission.

If Jyske Bank’s Executive Board with CEO Anders Dam wants to meet and talk to us. Then we like to give thunder coffee, then Anders Dam can bring the cake. And then we could sit down together and as adult people, then talk together.

/ IT CANNOT BE SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND

WE DO NOT WANT THIS CASE. BUT THE QUESTION IS

IF WE ARE RIGHT AND JYSKE BANK’S BOARD MEMBERS REFUSE TO ACCEPT IT.

So Jyske bank has a pretty big problem.

/

Are you still amused by your power to deceive the bank’s customers, Anders Dam

we do not think it is fun to be deceived at Denmark’s second largest bank. And offers CEO Anders Christian Dam A GOOD COPY THROUGH COFFEE. ANDERS DAM, SO YOU CAN GIVE THE CAKE

And Anders We still live in Denmark on Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek

Phone +45 22227713 You may also want to call us, let’s meet.

Se more at Banknyt dk

#news #finans #banks #stokes #JyskeBank #AndersDam #Politi #dkpol

Jyske Bank A/S bag gennemført bedrageri mod bankens kunde, der nu igen må finde sig en ny Advokat, som ikke lader sig bestikke af Jyske Banks koncernenledelse.

see more in English further down

En bank der er ligeglade med hvad der står i loven, det er jyske bank vores påstande for svig og falsk er rettet imod.

Det eneste kunden ønsker, er at den samlede bestyrelse i jyske bank indrømmer, at jyske bank A/S står bag Bedrageri “SVIG” mod bankens kunde, og at bestyrelsen mindst siden maj måned 2016, har været vidne om bedrageriet, og frem til nu, har nægtet dialog med den bedraget virksomhed, bestyrelsen har ligeledes ikke ville stoppe jyske banks fortsatte svigforretninger, som koncernenledelsen har rettet imod bankens små kunder, syge som raske, bare for sjov.

Det er da også utroligt at Lundgrens advokater, der har fulgt med på BANKNYT dk. mindst siden 16. april 2018, altså da Lundgrens advokater bevidst og uhæderligt, vælger at indgå en million aftale med jyske bank, i forbindelse med en handel for over 1/2 milliard kroner.

Altså efter vi den 5. Febuar 2018. har overbragt, og dermed givet Lundgrens advokater vores sag, mod jyske bank for svig og falsk.

Lundgrens som stadig føler løbende med BANKNYT, skulle heller erkende, at Lundgrens advokater ikke skulle have forsøgt at tage røven på deres klient, og indrømme at Lundgrens havde planlagt bag klients ryg, at ville møde op i retten mod jyske bank.

Uden at have fremlagt, en eneste af klientens påstande mod jyske bank, for nogle af de mange forhold af svigagtig optræde, overfor retten.

LUNDGRENs GIV OS NU, VORES PENGE TILBAGE. I HAR TAGET RØVEN PÅ OS, SYNYDT OS. MENS I HAR ARBEJDET FOR JYSKE BANK DIREKTE IMOD OS.

Inden du kalder kunden her tosset, så læs siden, og print beviserne for Jyske Banks bedrageri ud.

SNART VIL ALLE FREMLAGTE BILAG 1-167 & A-AM breve processkrifter mm blive delt, du kan allerede nu rekvirere en kopi af sagen, enten på en USB, eller udprintet, sagen fylder 4 mapper, som dem advokaten fik i sidste uge, selvfølgelig findes der mere. SMS 22227713 hvis du vide mere.

Og spørg dig selv, hvorfor jyske bank, ikke vil svare kunde, og ingen kommentarer har til at flere biler, kører rundt med negativ omtale, som beskyldninger mod jyske bank for Bedrageri, Million Svindel, Svig og Falsk.

Hvis det bare er noget vi har misforstået, må det da være i jyske banks interesse at afdække sandheden, kan ledelsen ikke selv se det virker meget mærkeligt at blive beskyldt for bedrageri, og nu mistanke om korruption / bestikkelse, og så nægter at mødes med os.

Vi taler om at bankens afdeling på Vesterbrogade, der i øvrigt er medvirkende til svindlen, som er udført ved hjælp af dokumentfalsk. SAGENS BILAG 1.

Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade blev kontaktet første gang i november 2016, af en kunde på Østerbro, der sender billeder af jyskebank bilen, og spørger Jyske Bank hvad dette er for noget, han spørger også om Brask Thomsen stadig huserer i banken. “Tidligere FINANS BANKEN.”

Når kunde beskylder Jyske Bank for svig og falsk, strafferetligt Bedrageri samt Dokumentfalsk, og nu også mulig bestikkelse af Lundgrens advokater.

Hvis det er grundløse og grove beskyldninger mod Jyske Bank A/S og Bestyrelsen, så lad os sammen gennemgå hvor der står noget forkert, så retter vi, med et smil.

Så kan vi jo også lige

Er det så ikke noget vi kan tale om, frem for at Jyske Banks Advokater 1. Februar fra Lund Elmer Sandager, ved Philip Baruch, Dorte Halken, hælder vand ud af  ørerne, til retten og Lundgrens advokater.

Hvad jyske bank februar 2019 mener med at sagsøger begår Strafferetlig overtrædelser, ved at benytte ytringsfrihed, til at fortælle om at jyske bank laver svig forretninger, og udsender advarsel til jyske Banks kunder, og orientere aktionærerne.

Jyske Bank er stadig velkommen til at komme med deres forklaring, på hvad jyske bank og LES mener med sagsøgerens anklager mod Philip Baruch, Lund Elmer Sandager for at lyve overfor retten, og for at have bortskaffet bilag, at have fremlagt falske beviser, løjet for at skuffe i retsforhold, intet har på sig, måske Jyske Banks Advokater skulle aftale et møde med sagsøger, dette har sagsøgeren, forsøgt siden 2016

Altså at komme i dialog med jyske Banks ledelse, siden maj måned 2016

 men når Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater påstår Sagsøgeren overtræder loven og dermed straffelovens bestemmelser,

HUSK AT DU SKAL IKKE KASTE MED STEN HVIS DU BOR I ET GLAS HUS.

Bankens svar, det er ikke noget, og banken er ved at løse problemet.

Og hvorfor syntes nu 2 af kundens advokater, at være blevet bestukket af jyske bank, til ikke at fremlægge deres klintens påstande mod jyske bank, for svig og falsk, Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab som den seneste.

Hjælp os med at standse Jyske Banks konstante, og fortsate svig forretninger imod bankens kunder.

VI FØLER DET SOM OM VI ER MEDVIRKENDE I EN DANSK KRIMINAL HISTORIE, OG SÅ ER DET BARE DAGLIGDAGEN, FRA DET VIRKELIGE LIV.

Dette er en Advarsel imod #JyskeBank A/S & en Advarsel mod #Lundgrens advokater, dem kan du ikke stole på, undtagen hvis du har en bank, så kan du syntes det muligt, at du kan købe dem, er Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab til salg for højst bydende.

Advokat Partner Selskabet Lundgrens advokater, ved den erfarne advokat Dan Terkildsen, blev 24. “25” September 2019 fyret på gråt papir.

Klient i Lundgrens Advokatfirma, må nu for tjede gang have ny advokat, efter deres advokater i Lundgrens Advokatfirma, som ellers skulle varetage deres klientens interesser, mod jyske bank for svig, er blevet opdaget i dirækte at have modarbejdet deres egen klient.

KLIK, OG LÆS MERE HER.

Lundgrens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, har imod alt hæderlighed, og dirækte imod god advokat skik, imod klientens instrukser, om at skulle fremlægge adskillige svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank A/S, ikke ville efterkomme nogle af klientens anmodninger.

Det skal oplyses, at Dan Terkildsen, Lundgrens advokater, på intet tidspunkt har afvist at ville fører klientens påstande om svig mod jyske bank for retten.

Lundgrens advokater har enkelt manipuleret med klientens instrukser, og undgået at svare, givet undvigende svar, og sætter elever til at komme med løbende udskylninger, ganske enkelt for at undgå at svare på klientens spørgsmål.

At advokaten ikke fremlage klients bilag, 28-101 fra 28. December, men istedet usandt oplyste og bekraftede, over for klienten 22. Marts 2019 at alle bilag ville blive medtaget, hvilket eleven på sms bekraftede var aftalt med retten.

“Vi deler samtaler og sms i sagsmatrialer som skal understøtte at tidligere advokater og advokatfuldmægtig fra Lundgrens bevidst har vildledt klienten.”

Som når den fuldmægtige 22 marts 2019 telefonisk bekræftede, at sagen handler om svig og falsk, og så at vidner som Anders Dam og Philip Baruch, med flere skal indkaldes, for så 13. August 2019 at tale Dan Terkildsen efter munden, da Dan siger

“undlader efternavn på elever” Emil har styr på vidnerne ik, Emil bekraftede, og nikkede til Dan, men udspekuleret nævner hverken Dan Terkildsen eller Emil hvilken vidner, vi har besluttet skulle indkaldes.

I oktober da vi får sags materialet i sagen BS 402/2015-VIB og processkrifter 2. Samt B. C. bliver vores værste anelser bekraftede. 2. September 2019 kan vi konstatere at Lundgrens, ikke har fremlagt hvem vores vidner er, men bare har bekraftede dem jyske bank i Mars har oplyst banken ønsket indkaldt.

Vi bliver ligeledes bekræftet i at Lundgrens advokatpartnerselskab, ved den fuldmægtige Emil 22 marts 2019 både på sms og telefonisk har løjet overfor for deres klient, om at Bilag 28-101. var fremlagt.

FAKTA er BILAG 28-101. Er ikke blevet fremlagt, men Emil har i stedet i juli måned fremlagt nogle andre bilag, med andre bilags nummer, disse bilag har Lundgrens fremlagt uden processkrifter, og uden bilags liste, ja de er fremlagt uden at have aftalt det med klienten.

Hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke var advokat for jyske bank, ville klientens påstande og beviser Bilag 28-101 være blevet fremlagt, bilag 98. Var i øvrigt en bilags liste.

Lundgrens tidligre klient, er ret sikker på at at Jyske Banks bestyrelse, har bestukket ders advokat #LUNDGRENS med en million ordre, til at gå i seng med fjenden  griner altså “#JYSKEBANK”

På trods af klientens ellers meget klare instrukser til LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER, Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie, Emil, har Lundgrens direkte modarbejdet, at deres, klient har fået fremlagt nogle af deres påstande fremlagt, mod jyske bank for blandt andet SVIG, “Bedrageri i en millionsvindel sag” udført ved SVIG OG FALSK.

DR “BEDRAGET 2. ER IKKE LANGT FRA VIRKELIGHEDEN”

Klienten ved ikke at deres advokat mod jyske bank arbejder for, JA selv samme jyske bank

Jyske Banks Svigforretninger som klienten, mener den samlede bestyrelse / koncernledelsen i foreningen står bag, og stadig fortsætter, og det sker for at fortsætte bankens svigagtige optrænder over for jyske banks kunde.

Lundgrens advokat og partner Dan Terkildsen, fortæller 13-08-2019 bestyrelsen, ikke har noget ansvar for det jyske bank, udsætter os for, lige som Dan også siger at der skal fjernes flere af de nu fremlagte bilag “beviser.” Og siger vi skal naturligvis være enige.

Problemet er bare lundgrens Dan Terkildsen har allerede valgt at hjælpe jyske bank, ved at modarbejde vores sag og påstande mod jyske bank bliver fremlagt.

Efter Dan Terkildsen har udtalt, at jyske banks bestyrelse ikke, har noget ansvar, for hvad jyske bank koncernen laver, og altså det svig som koncernen har udsat os kunder for, siger Dan Terkildsen også at han ikke er nogle papegøje, der bare gentager det vi siger, men siger også at han tager hatten af for vores bil reklame, og siger det er godt gået, samtidig med at han griner, hvilket er gratis at sige, i Retten Viborg er det påstande og beviser dommeren skal dømme efter, ikke reklame.

Dette samtidig med at Dan Terkildsen har planlagt at møde 30 september i Viborg byret, uden at have fremlagt nogle af klientens svig og falsk påstande, som ellers er tydeligt skrevet på bilerne, men at Lundgrens advokater også har planlagt, at få fjernet flere af de nu fremlagte bilag lugter mest af bestikkelse.

Lundgrens advokater der tydeligvis har en skjult dagsorden, og forsøger at manipulere med deres klient, for at hjælpe jyske bank, med ikke at ville fremlægge klientens beviser og påstande mod jyske bank for svig, og koncernen ledelsen for medvirkende til fortsat Svig.

Hvis Lundgrens samlede partnere, ingurerrer at Dan Terkildsen har skadet Lundgrens klients sag mod jyske bank, ved ikke at ville fremlægge klientens påstande, mod jyske bank, imens jyske Banks millioner er rullet ind på Lundgrens konto, i form af honorar, for den hjælp Lundgrens advokater har ydet Jyske Bank, og vel stadig yder Jyske Bank, Så lugter det af råddenskab og korruption i det samlede Lundgrens Advokatpartnerselskab.

Understøtter dette ikke blot, klientens mistanke, om, det er de samlede partnere i LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER, som er sammen, om at skade deres egen klients sag, i mod jyske bank, samtidig med Lundgrens advokater muligvis har brugt klientens svig sag, til at kunne udvide sammen arbejdedet med jyske bank A/S

Trodde ikke at Lundgrens advokater, ville lade sig trække med ind i jyske banks fortsatte svig. Og dirækte er medvirkende, som Nykredit A/S der også i en periode hjalp Jyske Bank, ved at tilbageholde oplysninger om lån 4.328.000 kr. der ikke findes.

Der findes flere som har dækket over at jyske bank laver svig “Bedrageri”, ved at forsøge hjælpe jyske bank, enkelt ved at tilbageholde oplysninger overfor klienten, og at Rødstenen og Lundgrens begge nægtet at fremlægge klientens påstande over for retten, samtidig med at Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater har løjet over for retten.

Dette er råddenskab i store danske advokat huse, som ingen andre klienter før har kunne bevise.

Dan Terkildsen vil nok sige, at Lundgrens ikke har noget ansvar, lige som Morten Ulrik Gade, Birgit Bush Thuesen, og som Philip Baruch skriver JYSKE BANK HAR INGEN ANSVAR.

Det ser ud til at korruption og bestikkelse i Danmark, trives i bedste velgående, at det sker for at skjule store #Danske #bankers Bedrageri / svig forretninger er kun sørgeligt.

Særligt i de store Danske Advokater virksomheder og i Danske banker, syntes korruption og bestikkelse at trives.

Hertil er dato 5. Februar 2018 hvor Lundgrens advokater har fået vores svig sagen mod jyske bank.

Og så oplysningerne om at Lundgrenens advokater i perioden marts til juni 2018, har taget imod opgaven fra jyske bank A/S, om at Lundgrens advokater skulle give jyske bank rådgivning i forbindelse med en handel til omkring 600 million kroner.

DETTE SYNES AT VÆRE ET GODT BUD, PÅ HVORFOR LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER HAR MODARBEJDET VORES SVIG SAG, DER IKKE ER BLEVET FREMLAGT OVERFOR RETTEN.

Sagen mod jyske bank, der er en mindre svindel sag, og bare for nogle millioner, hvor kunde i jyske bank siger at jyske bank udsætter kunden for et fortsat bedrageri.

At Dan Terkildsen på første møde, spørger om vi tror Jyske Bank har lavet alt sammen med vilje, og hverken dengang marts 2018 til her sidst møde 13-08-2019 har ville sige hvad det er som vi påstår, er mærkeligt.

Men efter Klienten har opdaget at Lundgrens advokater, der er ( VAR ) kundens advokat, men som allerede og samtidig har lavet million forretninger for Jyske Bank, og derfor har store økonomiske interesser i at ville arbejde for jyske bank, og vel derfor hjælper jyske bank i mod Lundgrens egen klient..

Lundgrens kan naturligvis ikke fører en Bedrageri “svig” sag imod jyske bank, samtidig med at jyske bank betaler millioner i honorar til Lundgrens for andre opgaver.

Læs om kunden der alene selv, også har måtte kæmpe mod selv sine egne advokater fra Lundgrens og Rødstenen advokater, for at få fremlagt deres påstande, og beviser for at stoppe jyske banks fortsatte million svig, mens politiet og statsadvokaten, har nægtet, at undersøge om der er noget om snakken.

Den Danske stat har på denne måde, faktisk hjulpet jyske bank, ved at nægte efterforskning af Jyske Bank, for dokumentfalsk og bedrageri imod bankens kunde.

Statsadvokaten skriver: At kunden selv må fører sine påstande, mod jyske bank for svig og falsk i civilretten. Her prøvede så både Rødstenen og Lundgrens at få svig og falsk påstanden fjernet, od direkte mod god advokatskik arbejdede Lundgrens og Rødstenen i mod deres klient påstande blev fremlagt.

Read about the client who alone himself, also had to fight even his own lawyers from Lundgren’s and Rødstenen’s lawyers, to present their allegations, and evidence to stop Jyske Bank’s continued million fraud, while the police and the state attorney, have refused to investigate whether there is anything about the talk.

In this way, the Danish state has actually helped Jyske Bank, by refusing to investigate Jyske Bank, for document fraud and fraud against the bank’s customer.

The prosecutor writes: That the client must make his own claims against Jyske Bank for fraud and false in civil law. Here both Rødstenen and Lundgrens tried to have the fraud and false claim removed, or directly against good legal practice, Lundgrens and Rødstenen worked against their client’s allegations.

Det viser sig at være en svær opgave for jyske Banks kunde, at stoppe bankens fortsatte bedrageri, når Jyske Bank syntes at lave aftaler med kundens advokater, om ikke at fremlægge kundens Bedrageri påstand mod jyske bank, og at mindst Lundgrens vælger jyske bank som partner.

It turns out to be a difficult task for Jyske Bank’s client, to stop the bank’s continued fraud when Jyske Bank appeared to make agreements with the client’s lawyers, not to submit the client’s Fraud allegation against Jyske Bank, and that at least Lundgrens chooses Jyske bank as a partner .

Men når kunden nu skifter advokat, til en som jyske Banks bestyrelse ikke har kunne bestikke, med opgaver for Jyske Bank, for at modarbejde sagen mod jyske bank for svig, bliver fremlagt.

Og når jyske Banks koncernledelse, med CEO Anders Dam i spidsen, lader Jyske bank A/S advokater fra, Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater lyve selv overfor domstolen, med det ene formål, at skuffe i retsforhold, således BANKENS SVIG FORRETNINGER kan fortsættes.

På Dansk så at jyske bank fortsat kan udsætte bankens kunder for svig, og dette svig sker åbenlyst med Ledelsens fulde opbakningen.

Hvem mere vil medvirke til at Danske Banker som jyske bank laver Bedrageri

But when the client now switches lawyer, to someone who Jyske Bank’s board has not been able to bribe, with tasks for Jyske Bank, to counteract the case against Jyske Bank for fraud, is presented.

And when Jyske Bank’s group management, with CEO Anders Dam at the forefront, Jyske bank A / S lets lawyers from Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys lie to the court themselves, with the sole purpose of disappointing legal matters, so that the BANK’S FRAUD BUSINESS can be continued.

In Danish, Jyske Bank can continue to expose the bank’s customers to fraud, and this fraud is evident with the full support of Management.

Who else will contribute to Danske Banker as Jyske bank doing Fraud

Lundgrens advokater er grunden til at Jyske Bank stadig kan lave Bedrageri mod kunde.

Det ser sådan ud at LUNDGRENS advokater som skulle fremlægge deres klintetens svig og falsk påstande mod jyske bank A/S.

Er enten købt eller bestukket af jyske bank, alene det at jyske bank giver Lundgrens million opgaver, og Lundgrens påtager sig opgaven, samtidig med Lundgrens har vores sag mod jyske bank for “Bedrageri” svig som Lundgrens har ladet os “klienten” tro, ville blive fremlagt af Lundgrens.

Klinten har 20 september 2019 skrevet til Dan Terkildsen at Lundgrens advokater, ligesom Rødstenen advokater, har modarbejdet at vores påstande bliver fremlagt i retten, Dan har ikke kommenteret dette.

Har Lundgrens fået million opgaver af Jyske bank, for at holde vores påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk ude af retten. ?

Man kan næsten ikke tro, vi fortsat skal udsættes for dette her svig, vi har jo bare anmodet jyske bank og ledelsen om at mødes, for at få talt sammen.

It looks like LUNDGRENS lawyers who were supposed to present their client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske bank A / S.

Lundgren’s lawyers are the reason why Jyske Bank can still make fraud against a customer.

Is either bought or ordered by Jyske bank, only that Jyske bank gives Lundgren’s million tasks and Lundgrens takes on the task, while Lundgrens has our case against Jyske bank for “Fraud” fraud which Lundgrens has let us “client” believe, would be presented by Lundgrens.

The client has written to Dan Terkildsen on September 20, 2019 that Lundgren’s lawyers, just like Rødstenen’s lawyers, have countered that our claims are presented in court, Dan has not commented on this.

Har Lundgrens fået million opgaver af Jyske bank, for at holde vores påstande mod jyske bank for svig og falsk ude af retten. ?

You can hardly believe we should continue to be exposed to this fraud, we just asked Jyske bank and the management to meet, to talk together.

Disse her barnlige og for jyske bank sikkert nogle ganske morsomme indlæg, det er sku da dumt ikke at tale sammen, jyske bank er en anderledes og uredelig bankforretning, hvor det at snyde og bedrage må være fundamentet for Jyske Bank

ANDERS DAM. HUSK SAMTALE FREMMER FORSTÅELSEN.

At jyske bank har købt og betalt vores advokater fra Lundgrens, sådan ser det ihvertfald ud, siden Lundgrens advokater har modarbejdet deres egen klient.

Vores advokat LUNDGRENS i sagen mod jyske bank for SVIG, syntes at vælge at gå i seng med fjenden, og rådgive jyske bank i million sag, frem for at ville fremlægge vores påstande mod banken.

Det må stå klart for både Lundgrens og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, at begge disse advokat virksomheder sammen, bør opdrages af Advokat samfundet, og lære hvad god advokat skik er for noget, og om det ikke også gælder for de advokater som arbejder for de Danske banker.

En finansiel katastrofe, ikke kun for tilliden til de store Danske Banker, men også tilliden til de store Danske Advokat virksomheder, som skulle hjælpe deres klienter, men som istedet hjælper bankerne, med at skjule bankens fortsatte svigforretninger i mod deres kunder.

SKULLE DENNE HER SAG VÆRE ET ENESTÅENDE TILFÆLDE ? NÆPPE.

Jyske bank udsætter os kunder for groft svig, dette opdaterer vi først i 2016, og beder Thomas Schioldan Sørensen fra Rødstenen advokater, om at ændre i vores påstande.

I 2017 må vores advokat Thomas Schioldan Sørensen i sagen stoppe, efter vi tager advokatvirksomheden Rødstenen, i at lyve overfor os, og sikkert også har lavet en aftale med jyske bank, Thomas Schioldan har forsøgt, bag ryggen af klienten at ville hæve sagen mod jyske bank, som af klienten, i 2016 var oplyst ændret til en sag om svig og falsk, hvilket Thomas Schioldan stik i mod klientens anmodninger, ikke har ville fremlægge for retten.

Da Storbjerg Erhverv herefter må søge efter anden advokat, spørges bla. en advokat, der er bestyrelses formand for en stor advokatvirksomhed, om hjælp men må afvise at hjælpe, da de har hjulpet jyske bank i en sag med BRF KREDIT.

I marts 2018 bliver vi af en tidligere bank diriktør, anbefalet Lundgrens advokater, mere bestemt Dan Terkildsen.

Dan Terkildsen bliver oplyst, om de andre advokater, vi har talt med, men som ikke har kunne tage sagen, Dan bliver fremlagt at sagen mod jyske bank er en svig og falsk sag, og Dan Terkeldsen siger at han ingen problemer har med at føre sagen mod jyske bank for svig. “Bedrageri” Lundgrenens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, tiltræder omkring febuar 2018.

Her efter har vi ikke kunne få Lundgrens advokater, til at fremlægge nogle af vores påstande, og har ikke kunne få svar på noget af det vi har skrevet.

I dag 21. September 2019 googlede vi så ordene “Lundgrens Jyske Bank” det gav indblik i hvordan Lundgrens advokater i juni 2018, på deres hjemmeside, har fremlagt at have hjulpet Jyske Bank med en handel for et tre cifret million beløb.

HVORDAN LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER KAN HJÆLPE JYSKE BANK MED EN SAG FOR FLERE HUNDREDE MILLIONER

OG SAMTIDIG HAR KUNNE LADE OS, KLIENTEN TRO AT LUNDGRENS SAMTIDIG, HAR FØRT VORES SAG MOD JYSKE BANK FOR SVIG OG FALSK. “BEDRAGERI OG DOKUMENTFALSK” DET LIGGER OVER VORES FANTASI. klik på teksten, og følg linket nedenunder.

Danmarks nok mægtigste bankmand CEO Anders Christian Dam, står fast, og nægter at svare bankens kunder, og dermed, har også koncernenledelsen tilbage holdt vigtige oplysninger, om det af Jyske Banks påstået lån på 4.328.000 kr. er optaget i Nykredit og derefter påstået omlagt, som jyske bank har fremlagt det overfor retten.

Den samlede Jyske Bank koncernenledelse, har mindst siden 19. Maj 2016 harft viden om bankens svindel, mod jyske banks egen kunde, hvor ledelsen kunne have være skrede ind, og undersøgt sagen, samt stoppe Jyske Banks fortsatte svig imod jyske banks kunder, men dette har ingen i jyske bank koncernen ønsket.

Koncernenledelsen, nægtede istedet, at bekrafte eller afkræfte hvorvidt, kunden har optaget / hjemtaget det underliggende lån i Nykredit, som banken og Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, har påstået overfor retten.

Og siden maj 2016 har koncernen nægtet, og nægter stadig at stoppe jyske banks million svindel, og udnyttelse af bankens små kunder, hvorfor kunden i september 2019 gennem 43 måneder, stadig kæmper, for at få deres påstand om Jyske Banks SVIG FORRETNINGER fremlagt overfor Domstolen.

Koncern diriktør Anders Christian Dam, har flere gange siden 19 maj 2016 kunne vælge selv, og helt personligt, at kunne have stoppe Jyske Banks million svindel, imod bankens egen kund.

Men Anders Dam vælger sammen med den øvrige ledelse, ikke at stoppe svindlen, der samtidig ville have afsløret advokatvirksomheden Lund Elmer Sandager for medvirkende, i at skjule Jyske Banks bedrageri “svig” mod kunde i jyske bank, hvor Philip Baruch for jyske Bank, flere gange har løjet overfor retten.

Philip Baruch der også bestyrelsesmedlem i jyske bank, har mindst haft et møde 02-11-2018 med Lundgrens advokater, Dan Terkeldsen, som er vores advokat i sagen mod jyske banks svigforretninger.

Efterfølgende har Lundgrens advokater modarbejdet og dirækte imod klientens instruks, ikke ville fremlægge nogle af klientens påstande, som Svig og Falsk overfor for retten.

Svig og falsk hvilket både Rødstenen advokater sammen med Lundgrens advokater, begge har modsat sig bliver fremlagt, klientens Advokater har nu i samlet 43 måneder direkte modarbejdet at klientens påstande er blivet fremlagt.

Jyske Banks bestyrelse ved alle sammen udemærket, at jyske bank realt kynisk udsætter os kunder, os for et fortsat bedrageri, og dette udføres ved hjælp af dokumentfalsk, og ved at Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, flere gange i sagen, har løjet overfor retten, hvilket kunden har oplyst til retten.

Mens bankens mægtige ledelse, klammer sig fast til deres bestyrelses poster, og million indtægter, udsætter jyske bank os kunder, helt bevidst for Bedrageri.

Hvilket kunden bad deres advokater, først Thomas Schioldan Sørensen fra Rødstenen i 2016 og 2017

Og så Dan Terkeldsen fra Lundgrens advokater i 2018 og 2019 om at fremlægge som SVIG & FALSK.

HVILKET BÅDE RØDSTENEN ADVOKATER, SAMT LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER. I 43 MÅNEDER HAR NÆGTET AT FREMLÆGGE OVER FOR RETTEN.

Tænker at koncernenledelsen i jyske bank satser på politiet også efter en hovedforhandlingen, som nok kun kan forhalles frem til 2020.

Hvor beviserne for jyske Banks mange forskellige forhold af lov overtrædelser, er fremlagt, og vil blive fuldt op af et nyt processkift, og påstands dokument.

Som vi nu, sansynligvis, må have en ny og tredje advokat, til at fremlægge, eftersom både Rødstenen og Lundgrens advokater syntes ligge i ske med jyske bank, samtidig med at have forgivet, at være klientens advokat, med det formål at dregne klienten for penge og energi, dette er hvad klienten føler.

Men det kommer ikke til at ske, nu bliver kunden bare rigtig godt gal.

Alt imens Lundgrens advokater tilsyneladende, fortsat vil dække over Jyske Banks bestyrelsesmedlemmer, har medvirket til at bankens kunde stadig i jyske bank, gennem nu 11 år udsættes for endog groft svig.

Kunden i jyske bank er ret sikker på, at den samlede bestyrelse i jyske bank, står sammen i forening, om at Jyske Bank fortsætter med at udsætte kunde for svig, i håb om kunden ikke kan få råd til en advokat, der kan stoppe jyske banks fortsatte svigforretninger imod bankens kunder.

For jyske bank koncernen & koncernenledelsen, handler det om økonomisk at udmattet kunden, som banken forsat udsætter for “SVIG” Bedrageri.

Her har vi en stor Dansk Bank der er helt uden nogen form for moral, uden etik lader deres kunder udsætte for Bedrageri, det vi fremføre som GROFT UDNYTTELSE VED SVIG OG FALSK.

–

Click and read that we inform the court about in letters January 3 and January 25, 2018 August 2, and corrected 2019 And as an example to our attorney November 4, 2018. Citing the letter Jan 3, 2018 

As the court writes November 13, 2018, Seen in the light of what we have written and presented, and immediately after November 13, write and inform our lawyer. That everything that we have presented to the court, must be retained Believes that by the letter 03-08-2019 and sent information, to the court that the case, still is a fraud and false case.

And we as in letters to the court from 3 and 25 January 2018. Still accusing “Jyske Bank” Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys for lying to the court. We are still expecting, the court to investigate, this charge against the attorneys, whether board member Philip Baruch has lied, or provided any information to the court that is false. So, if some lawyers and the court, by the letter of November 13, 2018, succeeded in removing our sent letters of January 3 and 25, 2018 Then must the letters be into the chase BS 1-698/2015 again. Or is it possible to misunderstand what we highlight is the case Lying in legal relationships, fraud and fake 

The case also contains the claim that there is no loan, but Jyske bank has made fraud, to make the customer believe this existed and that the customer has rescheduled this loan. This is easily proved by Appendix 30. D and Appendix 28.

No one can want to prohibit a customer, from presenting to the court that this is fraud. and then the sanity has only grown, as the board has covered the scam, though several attorneys have helped cover up the fraud.

AND SO WE WRITE IN THE COURT OF AUGUST 3, 2019

THIS IS NOT FUN BUT JUST BECAUSE THE GROUP’S MANAGEMENT SEEMS, THIS IS SO FUCKING FUN. WE SEE IT IS SORRY, FOR THOSE WHO TRUST ON DANISH BANKS. Since 2008, Jyske Bank has exposed a small customer to fraud The customer discovers that Jyske Bank is making fraud in 2016. And here, tells Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers, and the management of Jyske bank about it. THE ANSWER IS NOT AVAILABLE And we have not received much help towards the bank, what we have received, we have paid dearly for. But we hold on, in our claims, and Anders Dam asks the Court to adjudicate on the case. Anders Dam, REMEMBER Just because Jyske Bank can deceive, does not mean you have to deceive your customers. Here is a very brief part of the case we have asked our lawyers to submit to Jyske Bank Let the evidence speak for itself. Are we dealing with a criminal organization? When this mighty bank, in every way, has thwarted the investigation and investigation of the case Misled and disposed of documents, remember a thief even, if it is a bank well, can be discovered. Main hearing starts September 30, 2019 BS 1-698 / 2015 at 9.00 Viborg Remember that the bank is not convicted but what does the evidence say

Here, Philip Baruch of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors will fight to win over the client who just will not give up the talented lawyers of Jyske bank

We have asked our lawyer to go after you for lying in court

It will now be nice to be able to get a verdict in the case, and hopefully get the fraud stopped after 11 years.

The battle between the top management in Jyske Bank and Storbjerg Erhverv Will be led by CEO Anders Dam who for the combined group as well as the equally experienced Lawyer Philip Baruch, who believes that Jyske Bank is an honest and honorable bank that complies with all laws and regulations. And therefore take the matter with serenity The mighty bank Jyske bank, is expected in court to do everything they can to fight their customer Storbjerg Erhverv. Because in Jyske bank it’s all about winning, it’s not about running a reputable banking business. The client does not care regardless of their own lawyer, has not confirmed that Jyske bank is suing them for fraud. So that is our view, and we will present that too.

Jyske bank thought it was easy to cheat and deceive a sick customer But apparently made horrible mistakes. Therefore, these witnesses from Jyske Bank, are repeatedly requested to call.

Anders Dam why don’t you want to talk to us. What have we done since you, along with the rest of your army, deceived us? You can offer us a meeting and explain to us what we have done in Jutland since refusing to make up Jutlandic honor. Anders Dam we are right, neither you nor anyone else on the board should be a member of the board, but immediately set your mandate free. But we are wrong, so help us understand the law, since we are obviously not as smart as you Anders Dam We want to give you our hand, but you have to receive it. And then will we apologize for teasing you, in this little fight, but what to do when it’s the mouse against the elephant and the elephant just steps on one. ANDERS NUMMERET ER 22227713 RING

WE HAVE TRIED AND TRIED TO RETURN HANDS BUT JYSKE BANK REFUSES ANY FORM FOR DIALOGUE THEREFORE, THIS STOCK IS TO FIND ON BANKNYT DK

Since May 2016, have the customer, been trying to shout up 
the total Group management in Jyske Bank unsuccessfully. 

Therefore some cars are driving around with these, free advertising for jyske bank A/S Denmark.

Thes advertising is to show that this danish bank, is totally indifferent that the bank's customer is being exposed to fraud by the jyske bank  

/

CUSTOMER IS ONLY TRYING TO GET INTO DIALOGUE 
WHICH BANK HAVE REFUSED SINCE 2016  

And instead the bank continues, what the customer calls, gross exploitation of the bank's power, to continue the fraud, which even the Danish police refuse to investigate. 

 
The customer has for over 3 years. yell up like here. 

Just to get the Danish bank jyske bank, to stop the bank crafty and very gross, fraud against the bank's small customer.   

It has been impossible to enter into dialogue with the bank's management in order to talk about the bank's fraud so that this could be stopped.  
 
/ 

The Bank Board Member Philip Baruch wrote, May 31, 2016 
This was after the customer's first direct contact the bank's executive chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam. May 19, 2016 and May 25, 2016. 

 
"just 2 of a lot of inquiries, which the bank May 31, 2016 writes they do not want to receive." 

The customer wrote 18, may 2016, and directly asked the bank's corporate management 
Appendix 66. "That the customer meant to be exposed to a huge fraud"

/

And asks for proof May 25, 2016 Appendix 68 

That the customer has taken out the underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit, which was otherwise offered on 20 May 2008. Appendix Y.   


Appendix 82 Here we ask the bank employee, on April 21, 2016 to prove that the alleged loan of DKK 4,328,000 is repayable and rescheduled, as alleged  
Appendix D.  
 
But get no answers we have many times in the past tried to get some attention, but this the bank refused to give us. November 17, 2015 Appendix 90. 

/
  
We fight against dishonesty in this big Danish bank, apparently living by lying to their customers.

Should we really be the only one who are exposed to such fraud in this Danish bank 

Join the court 
September 30 and October 1, 2019 
both days at. 9 am in court viborg 

The case BS 1-698/2015  
Is about fraud and fake 

which we ourselves have had to present to the court December 28, 2018  Appendix 100. and 101. with Annexes 28 to 101 presented 

/
/


FACTUAL INFORMATION IS & AND CLAIM'S CLAIM 

For an alleged interest rate swap Appendix 1. date August 16, 2008 
IS NOT IT CUSTOMER APPROVED FROM AUGUST 15, 2008. 

AND THE CLAIMED BORROWING LOAN OF DKK 4,328,000 
AS OFFERED ANNEX Y. DOES NOT EXIST 

 
WHEN THE BIG DANISH BANK WRITTEN FEBRUARY 19, 2010. 
That the customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000 
And swapped this loan with Jyske bank. Appendix 30. 


WHICH IS SHORT AFTER CUSTOMER NOVEMBER 26, 2009. BECOME VERY SICK. 
AFTER A BRAIN BLEEDING. AND THEN WERE SICK FOR SEVERAL YEARS AFTER 
See Appendix 93. 94. 95. 96. 97 

Our lawyer, believed that these appendices could harm our case by presenting them, but we believe these appendices precisely prove that Jyske bank, in bad faith, has cynically exploited a very ill customer, to make more money. 

WHEN JYSKE BANK CLAIMS IN THEIR PROPOSED ANNEXES D. date 10 SEPTEMBER 2015. TO LOAN ON. DKK 4,328,000 DKK has been rescheduled. 


IT WOULD BE LYING ABOUT THE COURT, IF NO LOAN IS FOUND RESCHEDULED. 
AS CLAIMED Appendix D. 

/

As the customer allegations have still not been submitted in the closing plea of ​​December 18, 2018 

And as the bank December 28, 2018, it continues what the customer in his claim holds is fraud. 
 
Choose the Customer himself to present their allegations, which is in testimony to the court, by Appendix 100 and Appendix 101 on December 28, 2018. 

/
 
Information / Evidence, around the interest rate swap 

That Annex E.5 of DKK 4,328,000 as of August 15, 2008, the approved swap for the Offer is Appendix Y. 

THE SWAP IS ONLY if the customer, chooses to take the offered loan of the 4,328,000. DKK date 20 May 2008 Annex Y. 

 

Regardless, Jyske Bank itself chooses August 16, 2008 
Self choose to make to make an new and number 2, interest rate swap. 

So that between August 16, 2008 and December 30, 2008, there are a full 2 ​​interest rate swaps for a loan offer. Appendix Y. DKK 4,328,000 

which the customer asks Jyske Bank to prove.  
WHAT THE BANK REFUSES. 

/
 
ANNEX 30 and ANNEX D. 
 
WHEN JYSKE BANK CLAIMS TO THE COURT 
HAVE BORROWED 4.328.000 AND SUBSEQUENTLY CHANGED THE LOAN 

That the customer had borrowed DKK 4,328,000 and this was exchanged with Jyske bank, by swapping interest Appendix 1. 

So the bank must not lie to make more money 

/

which Jyske bank claims the customer has repatriated, and then switched, to another loan in Nykredit.

The customer asks both the bank's lawyers and the bank's employees, before  
The customer again asks the management, to prove that the customer has made 2 swaps for this alleged underlying loan, in the large Danish Bank Nykredit 

As the group has claimed in the case, since it was opened in 2013. in the Banking Institutions Board chase328/2013 

Where the bank in Appendix 2. 3. and 4. on page 5. item 17. writes. that if the customer complains about the bank it must happen there. 

Jyske bank requests that the case be rejected, as the customer is a company 

/

Note on page 1. of the 3 Appendices, all of which are addressed to a company 

So the bank is misleading their customers, right from the start 

"before the customer knows that they are subject to gross fraud"

to complain about where the bank will reject the case, and hope to be able to make the case outdated. 

/

But even though Jyske bank In an email from Appendix 30. 
dated February 19, 2010 claims the customer has borrowed the 4,328,000 

And in another mail. Appendix D. dated January 9, 2012. 
"presented by Jyske Bank September 10, 2015. 

/

When the Jyskebank claims 10 september 2015 that the underlying loan, has been rescheduled 

The customer claims and submits that Jyske Bank bank is lying to the court.

 /

It's been uphill, just to get Nykredit bank to tell the truth 

when we ask Nykredit Bank if we have borrowed 4,328,000 and whether we have changed this loan, and when it should have changed 

But just like Jyske bank, Nykredit chooses not to answer, that's why we sue Nykredit bank since they have to tell us, about has we borrowed 4,328,000 in Nykredit as Jyske Bank has claimed. 

  
This was very strange for Nykredit to answer. 
But then we got a meeting with the bank. 

And Nykredit's lawyer Mette Egholm Nielsen also very clearly told, that Nykredit would not deliver a shoot against Jyske bank.

 
After a week we manage to get Nykredit confirmed 
that there is no loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit See Appendix 28. from October 18, 2016 

 
JYSKE BANK LYING, AND JYSKE BANK LYING FOR THE COURT.  

The Bank Board Member Philip Baruch wrote, May 31, 2016

This was after the customer’s first direct contact the bank’s executive chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam May 19, 2016

And May 25, 2016. Where the customer wrote and directly asked the bank’s corporate management to prove.

That the customer has taken out the underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 in Nykredit which Jyske bank claims the customer has repatriated, and then switched, to another loan in Nykredit

A case that the Danish state. FSA knows very well. But choose NOT to interfere And leds the Danish bank, Jyske bank, continue the fraud. And lets let it be up to the little customer, in civil court self to stop the fraudulent bank’s fraud. REMEMBER THIS Call IS ONLY A CALL FOR THE DANISH BANKS NOT TO LIE. And not to cheat their customers. AND JYSKE BANK GROUP MANAGEMENT PLEASE TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS. AND PLEASE DO NOT TAKE YOUR HAND IN OTHERS COOKIES.

A case that the Danish state knows very well

But choose to let the Danish bank Jyske bank continue the scam. 

Oh let it be up to the little customer even in court, to stop the fraudulent bank's fraud. 

REMEMBER THIS IS ONLY A CALL, FOR THE DANISH BANKS TO NOT LIE

AND SO TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS. 

SO PLEASE TELL THEM WHEN THEY ARE GETTING HANDED IN OTHERS COOKIES

Here you can read our claims, against Jyske Bank and Group Management, for rough fraud Which was presented to our lawyer on 6 December 2018 The 40 pages are a little down the page. BANKNYT

This case is about the credibility of Jyske Bank

Follow the case and look up on twitter

SEE CLAIMS as we in Danish can best explain

HERE ARE THE APPLICATIONS SUPPLIED BY THE COURT TO THE COURT 28-12-2018 FOR A KNOWLEDGE EXPLANATION ANNEXES 100 and 101 28-12-2018

SEE ANNEXES TO THE CLAIM EXPLAINED 06-12-2018 parts there are submitted 28-12-2018

SEE STATEMENT THAT IS EXPLAINED 06-12-2018 parts of it are submitted 28-12-2018

30-09-2019 and 01-10-2019 Main negotiation starts both days at. 9.00

Jyske bank We will see you on September 30 in Viborg. Hope you not will be able to continue your fraud. In which case we can one be sure that we have a rule of law here in Denmark. Anders Dam now read what we wrote to the group 20-06-2019 again.

NEWS FROM THE DANISH BANKS

The case here is not about money laundering, 
That Den Danske Bank and Nordea have made. 

But it's about simple fraud against the bank customer, by lying even to court. 

For In Denmark, no one is shaking his head, when the banks are making scams. 

It's just about money, no matter how it is obtained Here, 

a customer in Jyske Bank has been exposed to fraud for 11 years. and in this case the group's management has known about the fraud at least since May 2016 

Follow the case in Viborg courtroom 30-09-2019 

case number BS 1-698 / 2015

KLIK PÅ BILLED OG LÆS BREVET TIL LEDELSEN OG CEO ANDERS DAM 29. MAJ 2019, KUNDE BEDER ANDERS DAM OM AT STOPPE JYSKE BANKS BEVIDSTE SVINDEL MOD LILLE VIRKSOMHED

Welcome to Denmark’s Criminal Banks, which deceive the bank’s customers. IN DANISH

Danmarks nok største forbryder organisation, må uden tvivl være den Danske Bank, JYSKE BANK. som fortsætter bankens svig velvidende at det er bedrageri, mod kunder der forsøger at råbe koncernen op. 28-01-2019

Kunder går til angreb imod Danmarks måske største kriminelle virksomhed, JYSKE BANK og den lige så kriminelle bestyrelse, som ved Anders Christian Dam står bag fortsat million bedrageri imod bankens kunde.

Se opslag 20-06-2019 med breve til jyske bank, som anmodes om ikke at lave mere svindel, samt vi beder 24-06-2019 vore advokat om dato for et, møde til gennemgang af beviserne mod svindlerene fra jyske bank.

Mød svindlerene fra jyske bank her 89898989 Kontakt jyske bank, så står de måske også klar til at bedrage dig.

Koncernbestyrelsen ved Anders Dam mener ikke loven gælder for jysk bank, og bedrageri er blevet en helt naturlig måde for jyske bank at svindle bankens kunder.

Kunden som fangede jyske bank, og bankens bestyrelse i millionsvindel af lille virksomhed, ved godt at de er nogle hårdkogte kriminelle i jyske bank, kriminelle som kunderne selv må stoppe, da politiet lader til at dække over jyske Banks fortsatte massive bedrageri.

Bestyrelsen er ligeglade, de har kunder nok i jyske bank, så hvis nogle få kunder opdager, at jyske bank laver massivt bedrageri imod bankens kunder, har jyske bank kontakt med myndighederne, som hjælper jyske bank til ikke at blive efterforsket, for bankens fortsatte million svindel mod Jyske Banks egne kunder.

Anders Dam Jyske Bank leads the bank’s fraud, along with the management.

In this Danish bank, the management is doing giant fraud against customer, together in a union.

While other Danish banks only make money laundering, makes Jyskebank also document false and fraud.

Since the Danish police do not want to stop the banks’ obvious fraud, against their customers.

Can we who are being deceived, only cry out to warn others against Danish banks like this Jyske Bank.

We have tried to talk to the criminal gang, JYSKEBANK since May 2016. But the gang will not talk to their victim.

If it is just a matter of the bank’s foundation is misunderstood, and the bank jyske bank does not itself believe, that the management are together in unity, and does and continues fraud against their customers.

Why does the group jyske bank refuse to talk with us, but continues fraud against their customers.

When conversation promotes understanding.

For over 3 years we have tried to enter into a dialogue with the bank, who stubbornly refuses to talk to us.

We should look at the matter together.

And if we, as a customer, are wrong, we are the first to apologize

We ask the Jyske Bank to receive our request, and the court’s offer to meet, and together solve the jyske bank’s problems.

We therefore ask the board of directors, take its responsibility and loosen this small disagreement.

Best regards May 28, 2019

Storbjerg Erhverv Management

Søvej 5. Hornbæk.

Phone 22227713

We just wanted to have Denmark’s second largest bank JyskeBank, AndersDam to stop the bank’s and the board’s gross fraud, against us customer.

Even if the individual management members, are offered to admit their involvement in fraud. have thet all declined the offer.

And still covers the managing director Anders Christian Dam’s way of defrauding the bank’s customers.

The bank group has been accustomed to continuing the bank’s fraud since May 2016

Why does the bank not only admit that this time the fraud was not only discovered, but the customer has collected an overwhelming evidence against Anders Dam, Philip Baruch, and many more, who all together have made the scam possible for a decade

Why does Jyskebank continue fraud?

when the bank can begin to admitting, the bank’s many years of fraud, before we meet in the courtroom, to get the bank’s fraud stopped

How many other customers, like us, must fight against the Danish Fraud Bank Jyske Bank to stop the bank’s fraud.

We have since May 2016 written to the management In jyskebank, which unfortunately chooses to continue the bank’s huge fraud in union.

Ask some of the owners, such as ATP pension & A. P Møller, “A. P. Moller-Maersk” why they support Danish criminal banks, as a shareholder In Jyske Bank

UFATTELIGT at JYSKE BANK stadig 28-06-2019 helt bevidst bedrager deres kunder.

At koncern lederen Anders Dam, ikke indgik dialog 19. Maj 2016, da han som øverste chef af koncernen, direkte bliver oplyst, at jyske bank nok stod bag et kæmpe bedrageri imod bankens kunde.

Her 3 år efter vi oplyste ledelsen om bedraget, er Jyske bank koncernen stadig iskold, og ledelsen fortsætter koldt og kynisk bankens mange årige bedrageri mod deres kunder.

De nye trøjer og mærker som kommer på stadig flere biler, er kun for at skabe dialog.

DET ER JO BARE FOR SJOV, HVILKET JYSKE BANK SIKKERT ER MEGET ENIG I.

Vi tænker at sende en pakke til koncernen ledelsen ved Anders Christian Dam.

Indeholdende 1 kuglepen fra mobilix teleselskab. Slogan: samtale fremmer forståelsen.

Men naturligvis en trøje i størrelse L.

Med teksten: Kunde beder jyske bank stoppe svindel Anders Dam ring 22227713

Banknyt dk

“Vi deler naturligvis alle breve.”

Selv om jysk banken står bag million svindel af bankens kunder, er det vel ret normalt siden bankens ledelse fortsætter svindlen, men bare understreger at jyske Banks svindel sker i forening, og den samlede Konsernledelsen står bag.

Får Anders Dam en reklame trøje

Så kan bandelederen i den kriminelle jyske bank, Anders Dam jo tage den på, og altid vide at vi ønsker DIALOG

ANDERS DAM ring nu 22227713

Lad os mødes, og sammen se hvad der er rigtigt i vores egne fremlagte beviser i sagen mod jyske bank, for svig og falsk.

Jyske bank en anderledes bank, en bank der står bag million bedrageri af bankens kunder.

Er jyske bank ikke enige så ring, og lad os mødes og ved dialog rette op på eventuelt små misforståelser og fejl.

Bedste hilsner til en total ligeglad jyske bank, som sætter bedrageri højst, frem for hæderlighed ærlighed troværdighed

fra

Storbjerg Erhverv Søvej 5. 3100 Hornbæk 22227713

Ps Efter jyske Banks tv fulgte, os og ikke ville være ved at jyske bank bedrager deres kunder

Og derefter så blokerer os, stikker hoved i jorden, får ikke jyske Banks svindel til at forsvinde.

Vi skal altså tale om dette her, siger de kunder der er udsatte for jyske bank svindel

Støtter Jyske Bank Boxen Herning, jyske Banks forretningsmetoder.

Jyske bank fortsætter bankens bedrageri ved hjælp af Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater som gerne lyver for retten

Hvordan kan man få kontakt og dialog, med en bank hvis ledelse står bag bankens bedrageri.

Vi ønsker jo bare at ledelsen taler med os, når ja og stopper med at lyve og bedrage os, derfor ville vi helst tale med jyske bank selv, frem for de barnlige og nok morsomme reklamer.

Dialog Dialog og Dialog det er det vi ønsker at jyske bank skal forstå.

Når ledelsen siden 19 maj 2016 har kunne stanse jyske banks svindel mod kunde, men bevidst valgt at fortsætte bedrageri, viser det fundamentet i jyske bank som råddent.

Når politiet ikke vil hjælpe med at stanse bankers bedragerier, må andre jo gøre det, ledelsen i jyskebank griner nok over, at det i Danmark ikke er muligt at få politiets hjælp, når de Danske banker laver bedrageri.

Anders Dam kan jo bare ringe, siger en små sur kunde. Der er jo bare et par millioner, jyske bank har svindlet den lille kunde for, ved løgn, dokumentfalsk, misbrug af udløbet fuldmagt, overpant, udnyttelse, tvang når ja og bedrageri osv.

Få reklamer til bilen og et par gode flasker vin oven i.

Hvis nogle i jyske Banks koncernledelse, ikke snart har opdaget, at vi ikke er som de andre kunder, banken snyder og bedrager, så vil i snart opdage at vi bliver ved og ved og ved.  for vi ønske altså kontakt.

/

Når lederen Anders Dam tror det hjælper at stikke hovedet i busken, og der ikke kan blive set.

Og måske ligefrem håber at bedrageri kan betale sig for jyske bank,

Eller måske ledelse ligefrem håber, vi bliver kørt over af en lastbil inden 30/9-2019

Således koncernen direktøren CEO Anders Dam ikke skal blive totalt ydmyget i retten, når kunden forklare hvordan jyske bank i over er årti har stået bag million bedrageri mod deres kunde.

Kunden siger Så køb heller en lotto kupon Anders Dam, der er nok større chance for at vinde, end den ydmygelse det vil være for jyske Bank, at blive knallert af den lille prut af en kunde, der opklarede det bedrageri ledelsen i jyske bank fortsat støtter.

/

Anders og jer andre i jyske bank, ved det virker temmelig tosset, men 19 maj i år. var det 3 år siden, vi oplyste koncernenledelsen, DIRIKTIONEN og LUND ELMER SANDAGER advokater, at vi nok var udsat for et kæmpe bedrageri.

Tænker jyske bank lyver, og behandle alle kunder på samme måde, for at snyde eller skuffe i retsforhold.

Siden koncernen nægtede dialog, efter vi 19. maj 2016 oplyser koncernen ledelsen, om jyske banks bedrageri, så vælger bankens ledelse kynisk bare at fortsætter det meget grove og udspekuleret bedrageri mod kunde.

Tager vi fejl er nummeret stadig 22227713

Ring og få et dialogmøde, således fejl kan rettes, og vi undgår misforståelser som Morten Ulrik Gade skrev i november 2015.

Vi siger til jyske Bank

Det her er godt nok noget banken kan grine af mange år frem i tiden.

Men det er nu også sørgeligt at de danske banker, er så kriminelle som vi her beviser jyske bank koncernen er.

Godt hjulpet af deres advokater og Lund Elmer Sandager, der tilbage holder beviser og lyver overfor retten i retsforhold.

Hvis banken eller andre er uenig ! Så ring 22227713 og lade os se om vi har misforstået beviserne for bankens bedrageri.

Når vi fremlægger jyske bank som kriminel, er det så falsk eller sandt ?.

Når kunder er udsat for bedrageri, og har fremlagt det for ledelsen, som lader det fortsætte, hvad gør det så ledelsen til ?.

JYSKE BANKS KONCERN LEDELSE STÅR BAG BANKENS MILLION BEDRAGERI IMOD LILLE KUNDE

Jyske banks koncernen bag masivt bedrageri mod kunde, det er bare det kunden ønsker, at ledelsen hjælper med at BEKRÆFTE eller afkræfte.

Ledelsen i jyske bank inkl. Den ordstyrende formand CEO Anders Christian Dam

Tror åbenbart bedrageri mod bankens kunder er i orden, bare man er magtfuld nok.

Jyske Bank svindlerne som er i foreningen ved alle, både de ansatte og godt hjulpet af advokat firmaet Lund Elmer Sandager, at kunden er udsat for SVINDEL

Kunde fanger jyske bank koncernen i millionsvindel.

Vi ønsker fred men ledelsen i jyske bank ønsker at fortsætte million bedrageri af lille kunde.

I krig og fred, må David alene kæmpe imod Goliat, David er nok lille, men har beviser for Jyske Banks million bedrageri imod lille kunde

Bestil støttte trøjer mod de kriminelle Danske banker på 22227713

Trøjer leveres i størrelser S. M. L. XL.

Warning don’t trust banks in denmark.

Retten skriver 12. April til JYSKE BANK og kunde at det stadig er muligt med retsmæling.

Kunde er interesseret i at få RETSMÆLING og mødes med jyske bank, skriver derfor 16. April 2019 til retten i Viborg.

Anders Dam og den øvrige bestyrelse i jyske bank, har ingen problemer med at udsætte selv deres små kunder for groft bedrageri.

Det ville klæde banken at forsøge at bedrage kunder som A.P Møller istedet, men her er det nok for svært for jyske bank at lave svindel og bagefter skjule det.

Jyske bank og Lund Elmer Sandager taget i at lyve for retten.

Jyske bank har 25. Juli 2019 stadig ikke svaret.

Kunde mener ikke det kan være rigtigt at de forudrettet efter at blive udsat for massivt banksvindel, selv øknomisk skal bekoste advokater for at stanse kriminelle bankers bedrageri, da dette er et samfunds problem.

Kunde forsøger da også igen 25. April at skrive til Anders Dam “altså knap 3 år efter første brev til Koncernledelsen”

Anders Dam tal med os, har jyske bank intet gjort galt, ingen love og regler overtrådt  hvad er så problemet.

Har jyske bank ikke lavet / laver Bedrageri. Dokumentfalsk og løjet overfor retten, så mød os så vi får stoppet disse opslag hvis der bare er tale om misforståelser.

Danish Parliament politician, have before asked, if the Danish bank “JYSKEBANK” is a criminal organization

This is confirmed after investigating a massive fraud against bank customer.

25-04-2019 forsøger vi igen at få ledelsen til at holde op med at bedrage jyske banks kunder.

VI PRØVER FAKTISK DIALOG

Her skrev vi til Jyske Bank koncern ledelse 27-12-2018

FOR VI VIL RIGTIGT GERNE I DIALOG MED KONCERNEN

Her skrev vi til Jyske bank 18-01-2019

Svaret fra Konsernledelse er altid det samme, INGEN SVAR Mens Jyske banks ledelse fortsætter bankens bedrageri mod bankens kunde

In this case the board is united together about the continued fraud, against the bank’s customer.

CEO Anders Christian Dam, cannot see anything wrong with @Jyskebank and that there should be something wrong with lying, even if the bank has lied in writing to the Danish court.

As jyske bank presented manipulated evidence in court, and hidden appendix, it would show that the bank lied.

That the bank has abused the expired proxies, and even presents them without informing court the true date, is foolishly stupid, but the bank probably did not expect, to be taken for fraud either.

But here’s a bank that can’t count JYSKE BANK

Banks must only think of their financial opportunities to benefit their shareholder, such as ATP / A.P. Møller / pension Denmark

Follow the banks trial, a fraud case in Viborg court BS 1-698/2015

First day of trial is 30th of September BS 1-698/2019

When Danish banks will not stop fraud against their customers

And the police will not investigate Danish banks that are reported to deceive their customers.

Then the bank’s customers have to fight harder to stop danish bank fraud.

It should be the Danish Ministry of Justice, who stepped in and asked the police to investigate the reported and continued fraud.

And not the customers themselves as here’s up, against one billion companie as JYSKE BANK

Imagine, all these announcements are in order to enter into a dialogue with the group management, which has been attempted since 2016 May

Have just bet the bank admit

1. There is no underlying loan for some interest rate swaps with jyske bank Appendix 30. Appendix 28.

2. Nothing underlying loan has been changed Appendix D.

3. It is only made an agreement on an interest rate swap. Appendix E.5 date 15-07-2008

And this agreement is closed Appendix 29. Date 30-12-2008

That the bank itself, makes a new interest swap Appendix 1.

Without none conversation with the customer, and then lied afterwards this underlay loans as takken.

The customer must sue Nykredit bank, to find out if the loan has existed before Nykredit will respond, and admit there is no loan, that jyske bank has lied about.

Appendix 28.

www.banknyt.dk

@Finansmin @finanstilsyndk @FinansBreaking @finanstilsynet.no #China #Financial #Finans #Banks #Police #Government #News #Press #Denmark #Investments #Stocks #Jyskebank #DRnyheder #News #Share #Pol #dkpol

Fight against a criminal Danish bank

Follow the little man’s battle against Denmark’s second largest bank, which continues to cheat the customer.

But now the customer gets the case for court, after 11 years of fraud, a case there was launched in 2013 as Ref. 328/2013 in the Danish Complaints Board, and then into court 2015. as case BS 1-698/2015 Viborg cort.

An extremely burdensome cause to be the victim of, the bank Jyske bank does not care, this kind of small criticism does not have any significance for the bank

And what is the customer shouts about ?, as the bank is so cold facing

A case against large Danish bank, for rough document false and fraud

Fraud which the district attorney refused to investigate, and #jyskebank themselves refuses to stop

Moving in to the court for a judgment. September 30, 2019

The Executive Board of the large Danish banks is rewarded, to earn income and that without the shareholders like ATP. A P Møller asks questions

KLIK OG SE FLERE BILAG

why does Danish state not stop criminal Danish banks Big Danish bank’s fraud, the case It is also about document false, lying to court, abused proxy, The evidence speaks for themselves.

Synes du at det er ok at danske banker som er støttet af regeringen.

Laver og fortsætter bedrageri mod bank kunder.

Og at koncernledelsen nægte at stoppe åbenlyst bedrageri, startet med dokumentfalsk.

Hvis du støtter bankers bedrageri mod bankkunde, er jyske bank aktier et godt valg.

VI ØNSKER KUN

AT KOMME I KONTAKT MED CEO ANDERS DAM

Derfor disse opråb.

–

GIV OS NU DET TILBAGE

SOM JYSKE BANK HAR STJÅLLET FRA OS

Hovedforhandling

I jyske Banks svig forbrydelser sker i Viborg

12. April 2019 Skriver retten at der stadig er mulighed for retsmægling Ja tak KLIK PÅ BILLED og læs mere

16. April 2019 svare vi retten at vi gerne vil mødes med jyske bank For at være med i retsmægling – KLIK på billed og se bilag

With regard to the bank’s final remarks, Lund Elmer Sandager refused the lawyers to answer something on February 19. 2019

Which we were informed on March 22 that Jyske bank had failed with the bank’s final comments, to our Annex 100 and 101.

Strange, when this particular explanation provided, contains evidence, that the bank’s fraud is carried out by the entire board

Jyske bank will still not speak to us, which we do not understand, when all in the bank group should know everything about the fraud is not allowed, according to the Danish criminal law

Dækker politiet og stadsanklageren over danske bankers bedrageri imod kunder – Se link opslag KLIK

30. September

&

1. Oktober 2019

 

CEO Anders Dam Siger nej tak til dialog med sur kunde, efter bankens mange års bedrageri. Ønsker ikke at tale med kunde, men beder om en dom i den sag BS-1-698/2015 Hvori Koncernledelsen og Anders Dam af kunden anklages, for meddelagtighed i groft svig Hvilket er udført af den samlede koncernledelsen i forening.  KLIK PÅ BILLED OG SE LINK SAGENS FREMLAGTE BILAG.

The Danish bank, Jyske Bank, chose not to stop fraud against the bank’s customer, despite the board’s knowledge of fraud least since May 2016

Here has the group management itself, with the group manager CEO Anders Christian Dam

Refused to stop fraud against the bank’s customer.

Therefore we say that the crime is performed In a union.

The management who just does what they usually do, looks forward to the fight in Viborg court.

We only have a letter from jyske banks lawyer Lund Elmer Sandager Philip Baruch, back from 2016

Where the bank rejects a settlement.

So now we will look forward to meeting the Big Danish bank in court.

September 30. and October 1. 2019

If you have questions 0045 22227713 customer 0045 89898989 jyske bank

/

Only if the judge disagrees with the bank, and judges the bank according to the customer’s accusation against the jyskebank

Those that the customer himself, has presented the court. December 28th.

Appendices 100 and 101.

Only to get the evidence of fraud and false accusations, presented to the court, while it still was achievable.

/

The customer who started a case in the Appeals Board in 2013, and had to continue the case before the court in 2015.

First In early 2016, we discovered that the bank has manupled with evidence.

/

The bank customer did not know that the bank has lied, and deceived the company / customer

Who has been ill since 2009 after a brain bleeding, and was just an easy victim.

And therefore did not know, that the bank have lied in writing

To the Appeals Board in 2013 and 2014

But also lied to the Danish court since 2015

/

The main debate in the fraud case is now set for 30 September 2019 BS 1-698 / 2015 Viborg Court

It is an open trial, everyone is welcome

/

In court, the customer will explain in 1. hour.

How it the Denmark’s second largest bank Jyske Bank got success to deceive, the small business customer for over 10 years

An obvious deception by forgery, and exploitation of expired proxies, which the bank also has corrected in signed the document, after the document was signed by the customer.

/

It is about danish banks

Can you trust them, when even the danish police refuse to investigate Danish banks, for reported exploitation and fraud.

At banknyt.dk

You will find links and many listings that have been shared since 2013 they are in Danish.

So if you can trust on the Danish banks

That you will know after the case is presented

Hovedforhandling i stor svindel sag mod jyske Banks kunde 30. September & 1. Oktober KLIK OG SE SAGEN

Læs artiklen om vores måde at standse Jyske Banks mange årige bedrageri – At koncernen er bedøvende ligeglade er jo som det er, så godt vi snart skal starte forberedelse

Great Danish bank’s management from #Jyskebank in bad faith, and continues the bank’s fraud for millions

Which is planned to last for several years. “20 years”

We are talking about a bank the Danish state has supported economic, with loans through several bank packages.

Maybe the bank would like to thank the Danish government / Danish state, by making fraud against customers.  just kidding

The big question then is how many more people like us, are exposed to the same exploit and fraud, in Danish banks.

Maybe that’s what the Danish state wants to help Jyske Bank cover?

We do not know, but it should be investigated whether there is corruption in Denmark, which has been successful in hiding.

This fraud case at Jyske Bank, can very easily be organized, by the board / management, and this is possibly the reason, why this Danish bank continues fraud, even several years after the bank’s fraud has been discovered, by the customer himself

The problem in Denmark

Is just that the Danish authorities, do not want to investigate Danish banks’ fraud, and therefore refuse to investigate fraud reports.

Therefore, it may be the EU commission itself to be informed

Do you really think cars like this would drove around

And with advertisements that the jyske Bank is lying and cheating?

That it is for free advertising for Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske bank, if there was nothing about the talk

JYSKE BANK OG DERES BESTYRELSE NÆGTER AT STOPPE BEDRAGERI MOD BANKENS KUNDE UDEN EN DOM.

Dato for hovedforhandling er nu sat 30/9 & 1/10 2019 Viborg ret

Link til Twitter Kom med i retten Viborg BS 1-698/2015 Vi afventer 20-03-2019. Stadig på oplysninger om ? Har jyske bank svaret 19-02 deres afsluttende bemærkninger – Og hvad har banken svaret ? – Hvornår starter forberedelsen ? Har intet hørt siden 9 januar, og vil jo gerne vide hvad jyske bank har at sige til anklager mod jyske bank for dokumentfalsk og bedrageri BILAG 100 & 101

–

POLITIET HAR FÅET BEVISERNE MEN ER PASSIVE DA STATSADVOKATEN NÆGTER AT EFTERFORSKE BANKERS BEDRAGERI MOD DERES KUNDER.

Læs historien klik her – Sådan virker jyske banks hvidvaske maskine Jyske bank fik første millionbøde for hvidvask Men hvorfor er ingen banker mon efterforsket af dansk politi dækker statsadvokaten over der største ? Kunde må selv kæmpe for at stanse jysk bedrag

En lille sag om svig / bedrageri der ligger i byretten.

Men sagen hører bestemt hjemme i strafferetten.

Problemet er bare at her står der en bank bag bedrageri mod kunde , og så dækker Danmarks elite over det.

Jyske Banks Koncernledelse Ved Sven Buhrækall Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Rina Asmussen Philip Baruch Jens Borup Keld Norup Christina Lykke Munk Johnny Christensen Marianne Lillevang Anders Dam Niels Erik Jakobsen Per Skovhus Peter Schleidt – Er alle sammen tilbudt at indrømme bedrageri og mulighed for at komme ud af det fortsatte bedrageri forhold mod deres kunde Bestyrelsen afviste at underskrive, og valgte i forening at fortsætte Jyske Banks bedrageri mod lille erhvervs kunde. – Politiet er ligeglade med kriminelle bestyrelses medlemmer i store banker, disse må ikke efterforskes. – Derfor nægter stadsadvokaten at se på beviserne mod banken for groft bedrageri – Vi afventer her 1. Marts stadig på at modtage Bestyrelsens afsluttende bemærkninger fra 19. Februar – Og få datoer for hovedforhandling.

Vi tænker at Anders Dam og Philip Baruch Fra Jyske Banks bestyrelse, vil forsøge at unddrage sig som vidne i sagen mod jyske bank for svig / bedrageri Men grundet sagens beskaffenhed, og disse vidner er vigtige for sagens belysning, vil vi naturligvis forvente vores advokat er på forkant Når han indkalder de vidner, vi har anmodet skal de alle naturligvis møde op. Uagtet at Eks. både Anders Dam & Philip Baruch efterfølgende, risiker en straf. § 171. En parts nærmeste har ikke pligt til at afgive forklaring som vidne. 1) udsætte vidnet selv for straf eller tab af velfærd eller MEN Stk. 4. I de i stk. 2, nr. 3, nævnte tilfælde kan retten endvidere pålægge vidnet at afgive forklaring, såfremt vidnet har udført foranstaltninger som nævnt i § 754 a, og sagens beskaffenhed og dens betydning for vedkommende part eller samfundet findes at berettige dertil.

Velkommen i en anderledes bank, vi kørte en tur til Silkeborg, for Vestergade 10-16 desværre var Anders Dam ikke på sit kontor, lyset var slukket, så vi må kører igen med uforrettet sag.

Imens vi gør klar til krig mod den anden største bank i Danmark, JYSKE BANK for svig / bedrageri.

Fortsætter jyske bank bare deres helt bevidste bedrageri mod os kunder. Men måske lidt sjovt, for synes at have sammen handling:

Som da Kennedy bad sovjetunionen at stoppe deres skibe med atomvåben, der var på vej mod Cuba

Her valgte sovjetunionen at vende om, for at undgå krig.

Vi kan kun håbe på at Jyske Banks ledelse deriblandt deres ordstyrende formand også besinder sig, og stopper bedrageriet mod bankens kunder.

Ellers kommer der krig, siger den lille kunde imod supermagten jyske bank

Se det som sjovt

MEN VI VIL IKKE BEDRAGES AF ANDERS DAM eller JYSKE BANK.

Vi ønsker bare at du #AndersDam taler med os, og vi sammen ser på det her.

Når jyske bank bedrager kunder, men ikke har opdaget det. Kan banken jo heller ikke rette fejlen Hjælp jyske bank Oplys AKTIONÆRERNE om de vil hjælpe koncernledelsen, med at få øje på dette opslag, så vi ikke skal vente på en dommer stopper Danmarks anden største bank i at bedrage kunder

Klik på billed og se de seneste fremlagte Bilag 28-101 . Fremlagt 28 december 2018 – Kopi af fremlagte Bilag 28-101. Blev sendt til Anders Dam 28 januar 2019 ( Bilag 102. ) Anders har denne gang valgt 1. Februar at svare, med at han ingen bemærkninger eller kommentar har, til den fremlagte vidneforklaring, med beviser for jyske Banks og koncernledelsens medvirken i bedrageri mod bankens kunde, anklager der er fremlagt koncernen med de fremlagte bilag. – Når Koncernledelsen i jyske bank stadig 2019 sammen i forening, står bag bedrageri imod bankens kunder. – Og ledelsen nægter at holde op med at bedrage deres kunder. – Så må sagen afgøres ved domstolen, da politiet nægte at stoppe banker i at lave BEDRAGERI. – Kunde er ikke i tivl, jyske banks bestyrelse står bag jyske Banks million bedrageri mod os som udvalgte kunder. Svig mod kunder ? Kunde spørger koncernledelsen . Sven Buhrækall Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Rina Asmussen Philip Baruch Jens Borup Keld Norup Christina Lykke Munk Johnny Christensen Marianne Lillevang Anders Dam Niels Erik Jakobsen Per Skovhus Peter Schleidt . Om det er i orden at jyske bank lyver overfor deres kunder . For derefter at udsætte dem for bedrageri. . Synes AKTIONÆRERNE i jyske bank at koncernledelsen er uden ansvars for dette, fortsatte bedrageri . Jyske Banks bestyrelse fik svar frist til 19. Februar, vi har her 1 marts stadig ikke modtaget en kopi.

Selv om der findes en del personer som ikke ønsker, at bilag der beviser at jyske bank ved bestyrelsen og deres advokater, står bag dette modbydelige bedrageri mod bankens kunder, så er det 28-12-2018 blevet fremlagt

Bilag 100. Og 101. Er vores fremlæggelse af sagen mod jyske bank for et omfattende bedrageri, og svindel der er udført i forening af nogles af Danmarks rigste

Når rige bedrager fattige for at få mere, så forvente at i en dag grundet jeres grådighed vil blive opdaget

Den lille kunde i jyske bank gør noget ingen har gjort får, og tager kampen op i mod jyske bank bestyrelse

DETTE HER BEDRAGERI FOREGÅR I DANMARK

UANSET HVEM JYSKE BANK KONCERN HAR TILBUDT PENGE ELLER ARBEJDE

SÅ FORTSÆTTER VI KAMPEN

JYSKE BANK SKAL HAVE EN DOM FOR UFATTELIGT GROFT SVIG

OG BESTYRELSEN SAMT DERES ADVOKATER STILLES TIL ANSVAR, FOR DERES MEDVIRKEN I BEDRAGERI

Jyske bank er da ikke kriminelle vel ?

JO JYSKE BANK KONCERNEN ER DYBT KRIMINELLE

Men spørg dem selv, og del svaret,

Brug linket klik på Anders Dam leder af denne kriminelle jyske bank.

– Ding Dong er der nogle hjemme i #jysk #bank

Vores største ønske er jo bare at Jyske Banks direktion / ledelse

Senest 19 februar 2019.

Tager sit ansvar og tager stilling til

A. Anders Dam INDRØMMER OG UNDSKYLDER

1. Stopper med at lave bedrageri

2. Indrømmer udnyttelse

3. Indrømmer bedrageri

4. Indrømmer fuldmagts misbrug

5. Indrømmer dokument falsk

6. Undskylder for groft bedrageri

7. Anders Dam fyres / fratræder

8. Bestyrelsen fratræder / afsættes og udskiftes

SKRIV DET FØRST PÅ JERES HJEMMESIDE.

Så dropper vi jo skriveriet.

Eller

B. Koncernledelsen benægter alt

Og skriver på jysk velkommen i jyske bank,

At jyske bank kun vil, stoppe bedrageri mod bankens kunder, hvis banken først dømmes for svig & falsk mod deres kunder, som det sker mod virksomheden her.

SÅ VI SNART FÅR DEN DOM

C. Alle andre muligheder syntes at være udtømte.

Derfor skal sagen hurtigst muligt fremlægges dommeren til hovedforhandling.

Så kan vi få den dom Koncernen Ledelsen, så gerne vil have

Men som bangebuksen Anders Dam, ikke tør skrive.

–

19-02-2019 Dette er sidste dato, hvor vi ønsker at modtage en uforbeholden undskyldning, hvis ledelsen mod forventning vil give sådan en.

Altså ikke en beklagelse, den kan Anders Dam og Co. tørrer deres RØV i.

Jyske bank ka faktisk ikke længer undskylde bevidst bedrageri – Men de har fået en frist til 19 februar, til at indrømme og undskylde bedrageri – Herefter giver vi intet for bankens / direktionens søforklaringer

Medvirken til Jyske Banks fortsatte bedrageri er

Bestyrelsen ved :

Sven Buhrækall Kurt Bligaard Pedersen Rina Asmussen Philip Baruch Jens Borup Keld Norup Christina Lykke Munk Johnny Christensen Marianne Lillevang Anders Dam Niels Erik Jakobsen Per Skovhus Peter Schleidt

Derudover har flere andre medvirket for at skuffe i retsforhold, som ved at lyve Eks. Overfor retten, for at hjælpe Jyske Bank med at bedrage bankens kunder.

Advokater som Morten Ulrik Gade Jyske bank

Philip Baruch Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen Lund Elmer Sandager

Som sammen i forening, udsætter bankkunde for dette her, fortsatte bedrageri.

De er alle sammen tilbudt at indlede dialog, hvor vi kan gennemgå beviserne for ledelsens, advokaternes bankens mangeårig bedrageri mod deres kunde

Del dette med jyske bank, og spørg om banken vil benægte eller indrømme bedrageri / svig

Er det misforstået så ring Andes Dam #Jyskebank #Boxen

Vi undskylder og retter gerne 22227713 mvh Storbjerg Erhverv

Hej Anders Christian Dam

Imens du og Co fortsat nok bare griner af os og siger

Hør en loppe gø. Hahahaha ja det er da morsomt.

ja grin bare Anders Dam, vi går efter at få forklaret de fremlagte beviser mod Jyske Banks ledelses for groft bedrageri

Men i kan forklare jer i retten, der skal i svare.

Jyske bank bør skamme sig, men det er bestyrelsen som driver butikken efter AKTIONÆRERNES ønsker

Siden maj 2016 Har en samlede Konsernledelse, kunne opklare og stoppe bedrageri. . Men det vil Anders Dam ikke – Derfor nærmer vi os hovedforhandling i sag og jyskebanks svig mod kunder – Svig og bedrageri er det samme

– –

Tror vi ved hvorfor vores bevis bilag ikke er blevt fremlagt langt tidligrer til domstolen under sagen.

Det handler jo ikke bare om 100 kr. 1.000 10.000 eller 100.000 kr.

Nej det handler om en stor Dansk Bank og bankens svig for millioner.

–

At dette svig er udført af flere sammen i en forening, og som alle var og stadig er ansat i Danmarks anden største bank, som bestyrelsen nu dækker over.

Så en ret alvorlig og sammen spist sag.

At sagen kan videre føres i strafferetten, som at den Danske banken laver million svindel i mod deres kunde.

Dette kunne godt være grunden.

– –

Men Anders Dam du ønskes nu alligevel tillykke

Du og din bestyrelsen er personlige skyld, i denne sag mod jyske bank for million svig om du vil bedrageri & falsk, snart skal hovedfor handles.

Men det bliver efter Beviserne Anders Dam, ikke kun efter hvad jyske bank ønsker fremlagt. “Foreløbig Kopi af teksten her.”

Alle bilag der beviser Svig og Falsk indsættes først på denne side.

Anders Dam og Co vil have en dom

Jyske bank udnytter gerne at kunde bliver syg. Efter en hjerneblødning oplyser banken deres kunde at han har lånt 4.328.000 kr i Nykredit Disse personer er medvirken til at vi skal kæmpe for sandheden – Men er bare tale om vildledning og løgn som starter en lavine af spørgsmål til fundamentet i jyske bank. / Anders Dam nægter at svare Koncernledelsen støtter fortsat bedrageri i mod kunden, og har siden maj 2016, nægtet at stoppe bedrageriet selv om ledelsen kunne indrømme og rette op. Sagen mod jyske bank kun vokser FIND SVAR PÅ HVOR DE 4.328.000 KR FINDES – RING 89898989 jysk bank De må vide mere om de penge – Anders Dam Nicolai Hansen Casper Dam Olsen Philip Baruch Birgith Bush Thuesen Morten Ulrik Gade Er nogle af dem vi ønsker vidne indkaldt

Da Jyske Banks øverste ledelse ikke er bange for en retssag, en sag bestyrelsen måske tænkte kun var en storm i et glas vand, og bankens svindel ikke ville blive opdaget og bevist.

Men nu kan sagen vise sig, at blive en ganske pinlig sag, efter som ledelsen har været medvirken til fortsat svig mindst siden maj 2016.

Selvom Jyske bank igen sigter efter forældelse

At banken håber deres svig forretninger bliver forældet, startede denne nu ret så alvorlige sag imod banken i allerede tilbage i 2013.

At Jyske Banks svig forretninger først blev opdaget i 2016, er grundet falsk og manipulation af sandheden, samt at jyske bank har bortskaffet eller skjult bevismateriale overfor kunde, advokater og retten.

Mc jyske bank En anderleds gangster klub

Beviser som kunde nu selv, ved den underskrevet vidneforklaring Bilag 100 & 101 har fremlagt domstolen, for at sikker sig sagen bliver rigtigt belyst, og for at få en retfærdig rets behandling.

En sag bank kunde selv uden hjælp har måtte efterforske og opklare.

Og som kunden ikke kunne få fri proces til, da domstolsstyrelsen ikke mente sagen havde offentlig interesse.

Der er ikke sket forældelse som ved de 1.000 vis af Swap sager og 10.000 vis af hedge invest sager, alle om rådgivning, hvor kunderne fik ret, men jyske bank ikke ville betaling milliard erstatning, grundet forældelse.

Iøvrigt er der i denne jyske bank sag 10 år forældelse ved svig forhold, og her taler vi altså om fortsat svig forbrydelse.

HUSK DU KAN MEGET NEMT BLIVE DEN NÆSTE

Jyske bank prøver igen med bankforretninger, der er langt fra redelige bank foretning

Denne sag som vel nok også er værre end bankens hvidvasknings sag, hvor jyske bank fik en millionbøde.

–

Jyske bank sagen er være, da denne sag handler om et årelangt og fortsat svig bedrageri forhold,

Og som nu handler om den Danske befolkning overhoved kan have tillid til de store danske banker.

– – – Anders Dam læs lige dette fra dronnings nytårstale, den kunne også være skrævet til Dig / jyskebank

Med betroede positioner følger et særligt ansvar og en særlig pligt til at gøre sit bedste, dér hvor man er sat.

Det gør mig trist, hvis moralen skrider. Hvad bliver der så af almindelig anstændighed? Man skal kende forskel på dit og mit, på rigtigt og forkert. Det burde ikke være så svært.

– – –

Når de Danske banker som her #JyskeBank først laver bedrageri, som vi har påvist det, og bagefter nægter at stoppe bankens bedrageri imod kunderne.

Bliver det er et alvorligt samfundsmæssig problem.

For jyske bank handler det om at snyde og bedrage . Dette vil vi fortælle i retten når vi selv afgiver forklaring, med henvisning til mange bilag ved vores vidne forklaring

–

Når de Danske Banker bedrager deres kunder

Og tilliden til bankene forsvinder helt, har jyske bank en stor del af æren.

Det er muligt mange venner af jyske bank gerne vil offer os, og vores retssikkerhed for at Jyske Banks bedrageri og beviserne ikke kommer frem i retten.

Men vi er anderledes end de andre offer for bankernes svindel forretning.

Hvor mange kunder snydes årligt vides ikke, da de nok ikke selv opdager det.

Her handler det om at jyske bank står bag 10 års. Kontinuerligt bedrageri imod bank kunde, en lille familie fra Hornbæk,

Og at jyske bank ved koncernledelsen med CEO Anders Dam i spidsen.

Kender alt til bedrageriet men vil ikke erkende, bankens åre lange bedrageri af deres kunder.

Og da slet ikke stoppe Jyske Bank i at bedrage deres kunder.

For så at give en offentlig og uforbeholden undskyldning, dette nægter koncernen.

Når ja jyske bank benægter jo altid det som banken er bliver taget i.

– –

Måske jyske bank vil beklage over for bankens #AKTIONÆRE som #ATP

At kunden her mod bankens forventning, alligevel opdagede #jyskebanks svig forbrydelser og fortsætter med at ville stoppe dette svig, selv om det er imod Jyske Banks fundament eller ønsker.

Vi vil kæmpe mod Lund Elmer Sandager advokater Og Jyske Bank når vi i retten vil forklare at jyske bank laver million svig.

Prøver at skrive det lidt morsomt så ledelsen rigtigt kan grine af de kunder som banken bedrager

– –

Når Danske Banker beviseligt Lyver, retter i og eller manipulere med bilag.

Hvordan ved du så om jyske bank ikke også lyver over for dig.

Det kan du ikke vide, du tager chancen

Hvilken maske har jyske bank på, når de svare dig.

50 / 50 %

Er den SORT eller er den HVID Lundin viste også at have 2 sider.

Dette har jyske bank også.

–

Tør du stole på hvad de påstår i jyske bank.

Med 50 % chance på at det er sandt

Vi kan bestemt ikke anbefale dig at stoler på jyske bank, da denne bank bevistligt lyver, dette har vi beskrevet og bevist med bare 2 bilag.

–

Sagen her viser hvor langt banker som jyske bank går, når banken bedrager deres kunder, og fortsætte bankens bevidste svig / bedrageri.

–

Dette vil vi igen over for retten under vidne ansvar gentag, som i den allerede underskrevet og frem lagte vidneforklaring overfor retten. Fremsendt Til Viborg domstol BS 1-698/2015 med henvisning til de af os medsendte, og nu fremlagte Bilag 28 – 101.

Med Kopi til pb@les.dk Philip Baruch Bestyrelsesmedlem og aktionær i jyske bank, samt partner i Lund Elmer Sandager advokater.

– Du kan læse vidneforklaringen ved brug af link underliggende denne tekst  altså nederst

At det fortsatte SVIG / BEDRAGERI som jyske bank laver og udsætter deres kunder for.

Sker med Koncernledelsens fulde viden og dermed medvirken.

At #AndersDam nægter at svare, men i stedet lader bedrageriet fortsætte, styrker ikke tilliden til den anden største Danske Bank Jyske Bank.

Og når samfundets top advokater som.

Lund Elmer Sandager advokater hjælper jyske bank, med at dækker over bedrageri, som ved at lyve processuelt over for retten.

Tilbage holder, ændre eller bortskaffe bevis materiale for at ville skuffe i retsforhold.

Så er og bliver det til et samfundsmæssig problen.

Når banker som jyske bank bedrager

Bliver det også et problem for tilliden til de danske bankerne i øvrigt.

Måske derfor har ingen af vores advokater, ønsket at fremlægge beviserne imod jyske bank for bedrageri, imens jyske bank blot fortsætter bankens bedrageri.

Men nu er vores beviser altså blevet fremlagt overfor retten, sammen med vores vidne forklaring.

De fremlagt beviser overfor retten, er de bilag vi finder vigtige, for at bevise at jyske bank laver bedrageri / SVIG,

Ja for svig Hvilket altså er BEDRAGERI.

Dette er retten oplyst 03-01-2018 ved fremlæggelse af bilag, og brev til jyske bank 28-12-2017

Brevet gen fremlægges som Bilag 72. i vores vidne forklaring 28-12-2018

–

Når retten 13-11-2018 beder vores advokat bekræfte at retten kan se bort fra dette bilag 72. Og bilag

Skrev vi straks at dette fremsendte fastholdes til vores forklaring var fremlagt.

Bilagende fremlægges for at understøtter vores underskrevet vidneforklaring af 28-12-2018

Del 1 og del 2. Som nu er fremlagt overfor retten.

Og kopi sendt til Jyske Banks Advokat og Bestyrelsesmedlem Philip Baruch.

Bilagende er fordelt på 6 mails, grundet de mange beviser på overtrædelser af love og regler.

Denne underskrevet vidneforklaring er lavet, for at sikker vores sag bliver fremlagt og vi sikres en retfærdig retssag, altså at sagen fremlægges som vi har anmodet, og fremlagt den siden 2016. Sagen er muligvis af offentlig interesse, da det handler om hvor kriminelle nogle Danske banker kan være

Og hvor svært det er at stoppe de uhæderlige banker som jyske bank med at lave bedrageri.

Når først bankerne laver bedrageri, som vi her beviser at jyske bank gør det, må vi råbe op og få sagen fremlagt for retten.

Dette har vi nu gjort 28-12-2018

–

Hvis domstolen nægter os at fremlægge disse beviser.

Må vi til Domstolsstyrelsen, og nægter de at beviser mod Danske Banker for bedrageri fremlægges

Må vi til EU domstolen, tankerne her er grundet jyske bank konstant har modarbejdet opklaring

Sagen rækker meget højt.

Men når Danske Banker som jyske bank bevidst bedrager deres kunder, skal det stoppes.

Når intet af vores kladde til et processkrift, på de 40 sider fra 10 dec. med vores bilag er blevet fremlagt retten 18 dec.

Og når vi føler dette er vigtigt for at belyse sagen, er vores vidneforklaring og bilag vigtige at få fremlagt for retten inden sagens hovedforhandling starter.

Vi ønsker sagen fremlagt og forklaret under hovedforhandling, derfor skal det fremlægges inden

At det lige sker 28-12-2018 er grundet koncernledelsen i jyske bank netop vælger at fortsætter bankens bedrageri i mod os samme dag.

Vi har anmodet at sagen blev fremlagt, som vi har forklaret den,

Dette var måske ikke nødvendigt såfremt CEO Anders Dam gav indrømmelser og undskyldte bankens vedvarende udnyttelse og Svig imod virksomhed.

Men nu turde vi ikke vente længer, og derfor har vi selv sørget for at vores sag blev fremlagt med vidneforklaring.

Og det er sket inden hovedforhandling er startet.

Vores fuldmægtige i sagen, ringede 17.45 samme dag som det afsluttende svarskrift skulle afleveres

Oplyste det ikke var nødvendig at fremlægge nogle af vores bilag, som dem vi fra start har ønsket fremlagt, dog får vi fremlagt bilag 29. bilag 30.

– Som er et

Bilag 29. mail fra Nykredit om at vores godkendte rentesikring fra 15-07-2008 Bilag E.5. er blevet lukket.

Bilag 30. mail fra Nicolai Hansen at vi har lånt 4.328.000 kr. I Nykredit og rente bytter dette med jyske bank.

Siger også at det er nogle grove beskyldninger vi har imod jyske bank

Ja dette er ganske rigtigt nogle grove beskyldninger

Og er jo også derfor vores beviser skal fremlægges, for at understøtte disse beskyldninger, således de ikke står alene.

Tænker om Stein Bagger også tænkte bedrageri anklagerne imod ham var nogle grove beskyldninger. DET HANDLER OM BEVISER Og disse er fremlagt i vore vidne forklaring.

Vi blev oplyses at det ikke var nødvendig at fremlægge nogle af vores bilag

Da vi jo ikke har lånt 4.328.000 kr. i Nykredit tilbage i 2008 hvilket jyske bank jo har indrømmet 5. November 2018. Altså 10 år efter.

Og derfor har vi heller ikke nogle rente bytte.

–

Dette ved vi, og har også sagt og skrevet til Anders Dam, som er ligeglad.

Men retten skulle have vores vidneforklaring med beviserne fremlagt for at få

jyske bank dømt for at lave bedrageri / svig

Hertil oplyser vi

At jyske bank jo stadig 18. Dec. fastholder deres rentesikring

Bilag 1. fra 16-07-2008 til afdækning af renterisikoen på et UNDERLIGGENDE lån.

Men at de nu bare siger det er til et låne tilbud fra 06-05-2009. Altså er et overliggende lån.

Med henvisning til at fremlægge bilag, oplyses vi godt kan fremlægge flere bilag senere.

–

Vores vidne udsagn og bilag er derfor af afgørende vigtighed, at få fremlagt retten

Eftersom jyske bank 05-11-2018 har fastholdt Bilag 1.

Og dermed benægter alle vores påstande om SVIG.

– –

Jyske Bank har gentagende ændret deres forklaring over for retten, når jyske bank er blevet grebet i at skrive usandt.

Og når vores sag ikke er blevet fremlagt, som vi har forklaret og anmodet den den fremlagt, siden vi opdagede jyske bank muligvis nok lavede Groft SVIG tilbage i april. 2016.

Efter vi igen 28-12-2018

Konstaterer at jyske bank med koncernledens 13 medlemmer bag.

Og Anders Dam i spidsen Fortsætter med at udsætte kunde i jyske bank for helt bevidst Svig.

Ved igen at snupe 78.000 kr. Kalder det renter ved en rentesikring af et underliggende lån.

Et underliggende lån der ikke findes, Bilag 28. men som jyske bank beviseligt har løjet optaget Bilag 30. Et lån der ikke er aftalt rente byttet, men som jyske bank har manipuleret, senest 11-02-2016 bare var et ombyttet bilag E.5 med Bilag 1. velvidende at bilaget E.5 er lukket ved Bilag 29. Men som jyske bank nu 5. Nov. 2018 kalder, for et overliggende lån, som jyske bank har tvangs nedbragt, men benægter dog også dette over for retten i sagen. Dette er en af grundene til at vi 28-12-2018 har skrevet vores vidme forklaring.

Og herefter fremsendt og fremlagt denne overfor retten, samt medsendte bilagene 28-101 litterat rigtigt, da de alle er omtalt i vidne forklaring

Vi har i vidne forklaring, som i de mange breve til koncernen

Opfordret jyske bank til at bevise vi har aftalt en ny rentesikring 16-07-2008

Hvis tilbudet Bilag Y. Fra 20-05-2008 blev hjemtaget

Altså hjemtaget er at gøre brug af et tilbud.

Et tilbud på 4.328.000 kr. der udløb 20-11-2008, og fuldmagten for dette tilbud udløb samtids 20-11-2008

Dette er vores afsluttende bemærkning

Storbjerg fastholder og har oplyst retten.

At svig forholdet, er sket og fortsat imens kunde var syg efter bla. en Hjerneblødning.

Hertil er fremlagt Bilag 93 til 97. Carsten har mindst været syg 2009-2014.

Hvilket kun har gjort det nemmere for jyske bank at lave bedrageri i mod deres kunde.

Gratis reklame er bedre end ingen reklame Simon Spis

Bilag 100. At jyske bank har manipuleret med bilagene som at tildele flere virksomheder samme konto, samtidens og overlappende.

Bilag 101. At jyske bank kontinuerligt har udsat familien og virksomheden for løbende SVIG.

Og udnyttelse dette er sket ved misbrug af bilag, tilbageholdelse af oplysninger, og at jyske bank har været uærlige over for Domstolen

Velkommen til jyske bank En anderledes bank

–

Vi ønsker at jyske bank dømmes for svig,

og at Bilag 1. Er Falsk eller ugyldig.

Sagen kan nu hoved forhandles.

–

Det handler om beviser, hvilket jyske bank Havkatten skrev før de blokerede os, da banken er ligeglad med deres kunder.

Dengang var vores beviser ikke fremlagt retten. Men der er de nu. Og har mere hvis der er nødvendigt.

Og nu må retten gå sin gang. – –

De Bilag 19-113 & vores 40 siders kladde til processkrift der blev afleveret til 10 dec.

Så det kunne fremlægges, bruger vi nu delvist i vores vidneforklaring, nogle bilag er taget ud, og bilags nr. er ændret.

Lær jyskebank at kende

– –

Har koncernen Jyske Bank nogle spørgsmål eller rettelser

Eller har Anders Dam og Co Bestyrelsen noget i ikke mener er sandt Så SMS og vi får det rettet.

SMS 22227713

Mvh familien Skaarup

Bilag 100 og 101. Vidne forklaring underskrevet, læs den her.

Indsat side 1 af 2. Bilag 100. Af vidne forklaring, del 1 af 2.

Vidneforklaring side 1 af 2. Linker til bilag 100 & 101

–

Forklaring Til Anders Dam om hans medvirken til at jyske bank bedrager deres kunder.

Indsat ved side 2 af 2. Bilag 100. Af vidne forklaring, del 1 af 2.

Vidneforklaring side 2 af 2. Del 1. af 2. Linker til forklaring.

Bilag som er nævnt i vidneforklaring. 1. – 102.

(Link kommer)

Bilag som er nævnt i vidneforklaring. A. –

(Link kommer)

En offentlig sag Som er delt siden 2016.

Både på biler og på internettet som www.banknyt.dk

Jyske Banks bestyrelse har ingen kommentar til kundes opråb på dialog.

Derfor findes løsningen ved doms forhandling.

Jyske bank vil frifindes og fastholde Bilag 1.

Storbjerg erhverv vil have Bilag 1. Ugyldig og have jyske bank samt ledelsen dømt for grov udnyttelse og svig.