23-01-2022. 14.49.
This email os forwarded 24-01-2022.
To
Postkasse – Klagesagsafdelingen
klagesagsafdelingen@advokatsamfundet.dk postkasse@advokatsamfundet.dk, metnie@danskebank.dk, Danske Bank Welcoming <welcometeam@danskebank.dk>
CC.
stm@stm.dk, REU@ft.dk, fm@fm.dk, Justitsministeriet <jm@jm.dk>, direktion@jyskebank.dk, juridisk@jyskebank.dk, martin.nielsen@jyskebank.dk, Morten Ulrik Gade <MUG@jyskebank.dk>, Philip Baruch <pb@les.dk>, Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen <kbn@les.dk>, kf@nationalbanken.dk, nationalbanken@nationalbanken.dk, martin.lavesen@dk.dlapiper.com, jakob.ellemann-jensen@ft.dk
23-01-2022.
I ask and ask Jyske Bank and the Danish state and authorities at the Danish government to help, please read it all and understand I just want dialogue and then do something else, this is an extended hand to CEO Anders Christian Dam.
direktion@jyskebank.dk
juridisk@jyskebank.dk
martin.nielsen@jyskebank.dk
Morten Ulrik Gade • MUG@jyskebank.dk
Philip Baruch • pb@les.dk
Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen • kbn@les.dk
kf@nationalbanken.dk
Justitsministeriet • jm@jm.dk
fm@fm.dk
stm@stm.dk
REU@ft.dk
folketinget@ft.dk
finanstilsynet@ftnet.dk
Dear all in the Jyske Bank Group and your many friends in the Danish state, the Danish authorities, the government and in the legal community, the Bar Council, as well as your lawyers in Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers, Lundgren’s lawyers.
How long time will you fight against me, and refuse dialogue with me, in order to find out if it is me Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup from Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek Denmark who has made a mistake and writes something about you on www.banknyt.dk which is not true.
I think Denmark has a serious problem with fraternities, camaraderie and corruption as governing society, and in that way Denmark is not a legal society when the largest organizations step aside.
Since May 2016. I have tried to enter into dialogue and get Jyske Bank’s CEO Anders Christian Dam to find out if Jyske Bank has made a mistake, so that the bank could have the opportunity to correct itself, and do it well again.
How far has Jyske Bank been here on 23 January 2022. come with this relatively small task.
I would like to ask you all, to talk about this together, because it is a case that maybe can harm Denmark, why I also ask the Danish government and their support parties, to take a serious political talk, where the government involves all parties.
My hand is outstretched and I would like some other hobbies, than writing community critical postings, I have written to Jyske bank which hobbies I would rather spend my time on, and if the Jyske Bank Group, will help me spend my time on these hobbies above all this writing, then I would like Jyske Bank’s CEO Anders Dam help me with this.
In this email, I directly ask Jyske Bank CEO Anders Dam to help me, to be able to do something else, and that together we can clean up and delete all my pages where I have written about the Jyske bank group, so therefore I ask you Anders Christian Dam.
Do you want the “group” to help me get another hobby and we together sit down and remove the clues we can about this incident, you “or others” must of course not answer if in, or you Anders Dam do not care, but I’m only trying to get Jyske Bank to help me.
Andes Christian Dam you can at any time call me on +4522227713 and personally request me a meeting, we could also meet in Jyske Bank Vesterbrogade 9.
I have written to Jyske bank which hobbies I would rather spend my time on, and if the Jyske Bank Group, help me spend my time on these hobbies above all this writing, then I would like Jyske Bank’s CEO Anders Dam helps with this.
This email is not shared with the press today, but it is an obvious opportunity for Jyske Bank’s CEO Anders Dam to talk to me before it can become a real problem for all involved.
Jyske Bank can choose to bring an injury case against me for libel, if I have not written the truth here on www.banknyt.dk Jyske Bank and Lund Elmer Sandager have been able to at least since March 1, 2019, when Philip Baruch wrote to Dan Terkildsen that I committed criminal offenses.
Anders Christian Dam could also just talk to me, because I think that this one-way communication is hardly healthy, neither for Jyske Bank nor for that matter the Danish society.
I thought that everyone who receives this email should stick their heads together and then find out how to solve the problem rather than cover this up as I regularly write on www.BANKNYT.dk
That the Danish state and the authorities as well as judges are involved in covering Jyske Bank, which I write repeatedly about on banknyt.dk and in emails to you all.
In which authorities have not even wanted to answer whether the provisions of the law also apply to Danish banks. My 3 questions to the authorities, not a single time have in the answer.
http://banknyt.dk/30-10-2031- til-finanstilsynet- folketinget-med-flere-jeg- afventer-stadig-jeres-svar- paa-spoergsmaalene-gaelder- loven-for-danske-banker-skal- danske-banker-overholde-alle- love-jyske-bank-h/
It is not okay for me as a Danish citizen to fight this unequal battle myself, which I can never win in Denmark, since you to date have wanted to cover what I write Jyske Bank has done.
The page has been updated a bit, and if Jyske Bank again wants to write to the court that I am only about to tarnish Jyske Bank’s name and management, please send the courts a copy directly from the website BANKNYT.dk with pictures, as in the copy including maybe no pictures or videos. Remember as I am dyslexic there are always reservations for typing and spelling mistakes in everything I write. Yours sincerely
Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup Sovej 5. 3100 Hornbaek Denmark
+4522227713
Copy of the top of Bank news.
www.banknyt.dk
📝
Siden er OPDATERET SENEST 23-01-2022. KL. 12.30. her kan du læse mere om fundamentet i Jyske Bank A/S hvilket ser ud til at værre organiseret kriminalitet. Jyske Bank viser her deres MAGT for at advare andre at kæmpe mod svindel Banken. siden er både på dansk og engelsk.
CEO Anders Christian Dam Jyske Bank retire,
and make yourself useful, you are socially harmful for Denmark, and the Danish stateas as you act now.
Even though I am dyslexic and best at investigating, I will in the future try to write only in English, as this case may deprive the Danish bank of the right to conduct banking business in Denmark, which is why Danish authorities do not want justice, and go against the law, to cover Jyske Bank’s use of forgery, fraud, exploitation and the use of bribes in order not to have to take the bank license from Jyske bank.
17 January 2022. YouTube LINK. Nr 2/2.
This page is about the Danish bank Jyske Bank’s many frauds and false crimes as well as the use of bribery, which the Danish state and government are direct contributors to cover, as several Danish authorities themselves use Jyske Bank.
I know that I have written many times to Jyske Bank’s board of directors, who since May 2016 have refused to comment on the fact that I have actually discovered this organized fraud here, but as long as the Danish state and the authorities still cover the criminal international Danish companies like Jyske Bank, then the Danish bank apparently refuses to comply with the law, just because Danish judges as Kurt Rasmussen also indirectly have choose to cover a criminal Danish organization, which has also paid Lundgrens bribes, but it does not stop me, Denmark has a serious scandal with a fraudulent and criminal bank JyskeBank, as the state has chosen to cover up, it is a problem that is still growing, and I as the small victim do not want this war, but it requires dialogue and conversation from Jyske Bank’s CEO Anders Dam Olsen to solve these writings, which will soon be shared massively, possibly must the Danish state stop covering up the Jyske Bank and initiate an investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of Jyske Bank’s crime.
You who read here on banknyt.dk about my private struggle to stop the corruption that takes place in Denmark, and which is probably harmful to society for the country.
I have written it many times Anders Christian Dam, we can hold a meeting me and you and find out of what went wrong, and then Anders Dam as director of Jyske Bank and their lawyers, quite a few 😀 can ask me nicely, if I want to delete all these notices, so Jyske Bank does not harm the Danish state and the Danish authorities further.
It is so easy for Jyske Bank to lay on, it only requires that Jyske Bank’s board together choose to call me Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup, and ask if we should not close this little joke or war if you will. It’s your responsibility and your choice, you should now know, that you can not drive me tired, you can not kill me, you can not bribe my new lawyer, and you all know the same time that what I write is the truth, even if I just writes and shares posts from my little cell phone.
Anders Christian Dam now take the phone and call me on +4522227713 and offer me a lunch in Jyske Bank Silkeborg, then we will probably find the same solution, and we never have to talk about this little funny story, that I have written and shared here BANKNYT.dk
Here are the 4 bank directors from the Danish bank, who are the ones most responsible for the continued posts on this page about corruption and
fraud in Denmark, Jyske Bank Anders Christian Dam, Niels Erik Jakobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Schleidt who all do not care that Jyske Bank harms Danish society with their toxic banking business, which can be detrimental to the Danish state.
The Danish state that the Government and the state’s institutions as well as the authorities choose to close their eyes to Jyske Bank’s crimes against customers, and let it be the victim to stand alone against a criminal organization is incomprehensible, and in this way the Danish authorities contribute to Jyske Bank’s funding against the bank’s customers, and all victims for Jyske Bank’s crimes will not receive any help from the Danish authorities, the Danish National bank work closely together with Jyske Bank, and therefore will the Danish nationalbank not interfere in Jyske Bank’s financial crime against being able to cheat and deceive customers like me.
Says the victim of the organized fraud, where the authorities of the entire Danish state are direct contributors to the customer now warning other countries against doing business with the large Danish companies, as these clearly do not have to comply with the law, and if the company commits fraud, the Danish state and authorities cover the Danish company, I can of course only say the companies that ther here are mentioned Lundgren’s lawyers, Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers and Jyske Bank.
Says the victim Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup
Soevej 5. from Hornbaek Denmark.
Please help me, and write about the corrupt lawyers and criminal banks in Denmark, that the Danish state and government will not stop them.
🤝
Dear all of Jyske Bank and especially you CEO Anders Christian Dam, this page is primarily your own fault, but my hand is still outstretched, Jyske Bank should only accept it, as I do not want war, it is your responsibility and yours joint decision, how long and how many persons and bodies Jyske Bank will harm, with their dirty tricks.

Hvad er fundamentet i Jyske Bank A/S. ? At snyde og bedrage samt bruge bestikkelse.
I have written here on 21 January to Jyske Bank’s management and their lawyers, I write that my door is open, and with this I am trying to get Jyske Bank’s attention, and the same time I wish everyone a really nice weekend.
Here you can watch the video on YouTube, from January 21, that it is just a wish to get Jyske Bank’s attention.
🥳
You can easily view save and share videos from this LINK here.
Dear all Danish authorities, you should know that the Jyske Bank Group does not care who of their friends, the bank exploits and uses to cover up Jyske Bank’s many criminal crimes.
CEO Anders Christian Dam can easily stop these announcements, the only thing Anders Dam for Jyske Bank has to do, is talk to me.
And ask me nicely to stop, but Anders Dam and the other members of the board of Jyske Bank, do not care with my funny post videos, therefore more is coming.

When even the Danish authorities as well as the government, and the Danish National Bank who all have been informed about Jyske Bank’s use of forgery, fraud and the use of bribes.
And these have been asked to investigate all evidence on banknyt.dk against the Danish bank Jyske bank.
Choose not to answer.
Then Denmark faces a serious problem.
Why do you think that Jyske Bank would accept these notices, which have been shared since 2016, if it were not all true, Anders Christian Dam you are a big problem for Jyske Bank’s reputation.
Dear Jysk Bank’s lawyers in the legal department and your many board members, as well as the Board of Representatives, that your chairman CEO Anders Christian Dam, now make yourself useful, and talk to me before I write to embassies around the world, and directly warn against trusting the Danish state, as the Danish state and government cover Danish banks’ criminal offenses.
You can all choose to continue laughing at me, and think that a one little man can not harm an organization like Jyske Bank.
This is especially you CEO Anders Dam, we can laugh together and stop this campaign against Jyske Bank, you just needs to want it.
You can still answer, and say you would like me to stop keeping posting about Jyske Bank and who else I write about.
Anders Dam and you others, as I said to Mette Marie Nielsen 18-12-2019. it will only gets worse, Mette Marie-Nielsen
from the corrupt law firm Lundgrens, which is the law firm Jysk Bank group bribed, not to present my fraud allegations against Jyske Bank, and the bribery by Lundgren’s lawyers, it probably happened to your accomplice Anders Dam, but if you do not want to talk about it, then we can talk about something else.
Anders Dam I do not stop, I do not get tired, I do not run out of ideas for new campaigns, you want to test me against Jyske Bank’s power, what do you think, you risk harming the state with your actions.
When the Danish state with the government and the Danish authorities, proven to cover the criminal crimes that Jyske Bank has exposed other customers to fraud, simply because the Danish state itself uses Jyske Bank, how can you stop a state from participating in a Danish bank can continue with committing criminal acts, this is a problem about corruption in Denmark, the problem is CEO Anders Christian Dam and the Danish bank Jyske Bank.
The management of Jyske Bank does not care who the bank involves in their fraud, it is about Jyske Bank cheating and deceiving, in order to mislead consumers and get the authorities’ help to escape investigation and prosecution.
17 January 2022. YouTube LINK. Nr 1/2.
Yesterday, 19 January, I wrote to the special appellate court, that Judge Søren Ejdum has omitted several of the information that witnesses have confirmed, and that words have been introduced, sentences that witnesses have not said, my confidence in Danish legal certainty is low, when camaraderie is before the court and When Danish authorities cover crime committed by the authorities’ partner.

I say that Denmark is a corrupt society, which the Danish state and authorities are indirectly contributing to, by covering up the organized crime that Jyske Bank has been behind.
A customer of Jyske Bank has for several years, and many times written to, among others, Denmarks Nationalbank and the Ministry of Finance, but also the Prime Minister’s Office, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, the Ministry of Justice, and the Minister of Justice, about the criminal conditions here on the website BANKNYT.dk are shared.
And about the information that I have shared with you, dealing with fraud and corruption in Denmark, carried out by the Danish bank Jyske Bank.
This is shared with one of the masterminds CEO Anders Christian Dam. Carsten tells the authorities.
If what ther is written on banking news “BANKNYT.DK” is not true, As mentioned here on BANKNYT.dk then everyone ther is contributing, directly or indirectly to Jyske Bank’s crime, then just together take an injury case against me, says the customer who in 2016 discovered, that Jyske Bank is committing organized crime, and since 2016. has continuously shared this information with the authorities in the Danish state.
I clearly remember when Jyske Bank in 2018 bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, and their employees like Mette Marie Nielsen went against the client, this is a direct warning, do not trust Mette Marie Nielsen, she has so far helped a workplace with the bank’s million fraud could continue.
It is a surprise that Danske Bank chooses to
hire a lawyer from the corrupt Lundgrens, who has been a direct contributor to cover up Jyske Bank’s fraud crimes, if Mette Marie Nielsen had been employed by the criminal Danish bank Jyske Bank, and help to cheat and deceive other of the bank’s customers, it would be more predictable.

Mette Marie Nielsen
Tidligere MMN@LUNDGRENS.DK
TELEFON 3525 2990
MOBIL 2524 5103
Remember when Jyske Bank bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, and their employees, like Mette Marie Nielsen went against the client, this is a warning do not trust Mette Marie Nielsen.
As I said December 18, 2018. to Mette Marie Nielsen from Lundgren’s lawyers, It only gets worse.
The conversation is before I 21. September 2019. that I discovered Jyske Bank, has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers not to present my case against Jyske Bank.
However, it must be stated that Mette Marie Nielsen, after Lundgren’s lawyers, in 2020 was employed by Scandinavian Tobacco Group A/S. December 2021.
Mette Marie Nielsen moved to the next level again, and is now a lawyer for Den danske bank.
Mette’s new contact information is
E-mail metnie@danskebank.dk
Mobile: 21742872
Danske Bank A / S Group Legal.
Holmens Kanal 2
1060 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Before the bank hired lawyer Mette Marie Nielsen, the Danish bank knew that she had opposed Lundgren’s lawyers’ presentation of my case against Jyske Bank for fraud.
Listen to these 2 conversations 14-12-2018. and 18-12-2018.
And read tekst 14-12-2018. and 18-12-2018. with Mette, who says you have to truwith Mette, who says you have to trust that we do what we are hired for, and then see the complaint with evidence that Lundgren’s lawyers and Mette Marie Nielsen have been deeply disloyal, and opposed justice.
Congratulations on your new job Mette Marie Nielsen.
Hope Den danske bank will be really happy for you, Even though they know you have helped cover up Jyske Bank’s fraud.
Ask the Danish state and government what they want to do with their knowledge that Danish banks are committing fraud, and for several years have committed financial crime against bank customers, which has been done jointly, and therefore aggravating circumstances.
Read this link 30-10-2021. Danish banks do not have to comply with the law, which the state and the authorities support.

Do you dare to trust lawyers who come from Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers, and Lundgren’s lawyers, and who work for Danish banks.

Here I am trying in 2019. at a fun enough meeting to get Anders Dam and Jyske Bank to stop committing fraud, I do not know at this time that the Danish state and authorities will continue to cover the crime that Jyske Bank has exposed me and / or my company for, I also do not know that my Lundgren’s lawyers already on this issue work for Jyske Bank, which had bought and bribed Lundgren’s lawyers not to present some of the client’s plea against Jyske Bank.

Covers the police and the city prosecutor of Danish banks’ fraud – The answer is yes.
The Danish newspaper Poliktikken had previously written, about Jyske Bank’s CEO Anders Dam is leading a criminal organization, yes says Carsten Storbjerg after thorough investigation, Anders Christian Dam leads a criminal organization, is the answer.

1 maj 2019. is the government’s
Folketinget, Lars Løkke Rasmussen
and more as Justitsministeriet, Finansministeriet. Finanstilsynet.
Everyone is ORENTY and has received evidence that Jyske Bank is committing fraud against the bank’s customers, but no one wants to take responsibility for stopping the bank’s crime, after which the authorities refuse dialogue with the victim about Jyske Bank’s financial crime.

The 1 of maj 2019. is several boxes with evidence that Jyske Bank is committing fraud against customers, handed over to the Folketing and others.
Like to Søren Pape Poulsen
Folketinget, Mette Frederiksen, Henrik Sass Larsen.
🙂
Of course to Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Finance. Financial Supervision.
Everyone is INFORMED about Jyske Bank’s long-standing fraud, which has been carried out jointly.
/
The Danish authorities have been given evidence that Jyske Bank is committing fraud, forging documents against the bank’s customers, and have therefore been asked to investigate the allegations.
Unfortunately all state institutions and authorities refuse to relate to the fact, that Jyske bank has committed extensive crime. It is very difficult, yes it is impossible to get the Danish authorities to investigate danish banks, who have proven committed forgery and fraud, as well as used bribes danish lawyers, to disappoint in legal matters, it is especially difficult when the Danish state and authorities cover up Danish banking crime, since the Danish state itself uses a criminal bank “Jyske Bank” for banking transactions in Denmark.
The State and the Authorities are trying to kill the truth about Jyske Bank’s crime and business methods, by refusing to talk to me, refusing to initiate an investigation, as this will probably result in Jyske Bank losing the right to conduct banking business in Denmark.
That is why I say that Denmark is a corrupt society, which the Danish state and authorities are indirectly contributing to, by covering up the organized crime that Jyske Bank has been behind.
I am pretty sure that CEO Anders Christian Dam is stunningly indifferent to who he might drag down when the truth comes out in the press, about the bribery and corruption no Danish authorities to date have wanted to stop.
Mail 16-01-2022. To Denmarks Nationalbank bord. And Jyske Bank.
☮️
Mail 15-01-2022. to the Danish state and the combined authorities with a request to investigate Jyske Bank, according to what I have presented, on this page, if the Danish state and authorities do not want a corrupt society then the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority initiates an investigation of Jysk Bank, and if necessary to The Banking Supervision Authority revokes Jyske Bank’s license to conduct banking business in Denmark.
This is a true story about the exploitation, fraud, corruption and bribery that takes place in Denmark, and which the Danish bank Jyske Bank is behind, we are talking about proven crime which the Danish authorities cover, due to state institutions themselves using this criminal Jyske Bank for financial activities, I have the documentation for my allegations, the question is just what will the state, the Danish National Bank, the Ministry of Finance and the Prime Minister will do about it, stop this criminal Danish bank, or continue to cover up organized crime as Jyske Bank has performed jointly.
Can the Jyske Bank Group survive as a Danish bank, if the Danish state and the Danish authorities, including the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, stop covering Jyske Bank’s crime, I would recommend selling the shares in Jyske Bank, especially as they are high now and strongly overvalued.
Jyske Bank’s board must be fairly sure that the Danish state and the authorities will continue to cover up Jyske Bank’s crimes, since the gang leader Anders Dam still refuses to talk to me.
I have always played with open cards, read the mail 05-12-2017. this knew Rødstenen lawyers from Aarhus, who like Lundgrens forgot in both 2016. and 2017. to present the client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank, 12-12-2017. Rødstenen lawyers also tried to raise the case against Jyske Bank behind his back of the client, Rødstenen claiming that it had been agreed by telephone, read the mail 05-12-2017. in this conversation.
But also Rødstenen lawyers lied to me, they simply tried to raise the case against Jyske Bank, you can hear the conversation that Rødstenen lawyers refer to here.
Earn 5,000 just by finding these words. as 2 Rødsten’s lawyers have claimed I have said. That the plaintiff wanted to bring the case against Jyske Bank, you can not find them, we must assume that Rødstenen lawyers are lying, but Jyske Bank paid the commission for it.
If you or some can hear I say or have agreed with these Rødstenen lawyers that I will withdraw the case against the Jyske Bank Group, THEN I PAY 5,000 DANISH KRONER TO THE FIRST SENDING THE SOUND CLIP. FOR DOCUMENTATION THAT I SAY SOMEWHERE IN THE CONVERSATION. and agreed with the 2 lawyers from the firm Rødstens that I want to withdraw the case against Jyske Bank will receive 5000 dkk.
And then it’s about my fight against the criminal organization Jyske Bank to achieve justice, and wake up the Danish state, so that they realize that it is unhealthy for confidence in Denmark, when the Danish state covers banks’ crime, so stop now, and take your responsibility and revoke Jyske Bank’s license to conduct financial business in Denmark.
This case is permeated by corruption and bribery in Denmark, but who dares to say that I am wrong.
The collaboration with Rødstenen lawyers ceases shortly after, when I had to have another lawyer to ask Rødstenen lawyers if my claims against Jyske Bank had been presented in court, after as Rødstenen lawyers would not answer me as a client, read mail 12-12-2017. you can see some of these documents and emails in the complaint against Lundgren’s lawyers from 05-06-2020.
LINK.
17-01-2022. FREE ADVERTISING FOR DANISH BANK JYSKE BANK. PICTURES, MAY BE REPRODUCED WITH SOURCE INFORMATION JYSKE BANK WWW.BANKNYT.DK

Will the Danish state and authorities rule that Jyske Bank has exposed customers to Exploitation and million fraud, ask the Danish elected representatives.
Watch the 4 latest videos om YouTube Link here 14-01-2022.
🎥 4/4.
Watch the video on YouTube at this link.
Jyske Bank knows very well that the Danish authorities and the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority cover the bank’s organized crime.
🎥 3/4
Watch the video on YouTube at this link.
The Danish state covers a large criminal Danish bank, and opposes the investigation of Jyske Bank.
🎥 1/4.
Watch the video on YouTube at this link.
Jyske Bank and CEO Anders Dam, I have written to Danmarks Nationalbank and the Ministry of Finance that they should see BANKNYT.dk if there is enough evidence for the Danish authorities to stop cooperating with Jyske Bank.
🎥 2/4.
Watch the video on YouTube at this link.
Jyske Bank has a big problem after the bank chose to expose a customer to peasant captivity and was taken.
🤫
Although the Danish state, the authorities probably do not think it is a problem, that Danish authorities cover large Danish companies that have made Document Forgery and Fraud and used Bribery, as long as the Danish state ingure all inquiries and warnings, as here against Jyske Bank, so can it very easily damage confidence to Denmark
, and the Danish companies, when the Danish state and politicians cover banks, that provable have committed serious organized crime.
How long time will the Danish authorities cover the criminal Danish organizations that cooperate with the Danish municipalities, and also foreign companies.
I just ask.
You can ask the Danish state and the authorities, why not a single authority person or lawyer has dared to talk to Carsten Storbjerg, who is behind this diary, who simply wants to stop the corruption that apparently rules Denmark.
Ask how long the Danish authorities will cover the Danish banks that, like Jyske Bank, have repeatedly violated the provisions of the Criminal Code.
Ask why the Danish authorities do not intervene against corrupt lawyers, such as Lundgren’s lawyers and the Danish banks who refuse to comply with the law within financial companies, and repeatedly violate the provisions of the Penal Code.
Read the rest on the page www.banknyt.dk.
if you have any of you disagree with any of what I have written, ask me for a meeting where we can review my claims and evidence together, if there are errors then we can correct it.
best regards
Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup Soevej 5. 3100 Hornbaek Denmark

Lawyers in Hjorten lawyer, Kromann Reumert lawyers, and DLA Piper Lawyers, have thus helped to cover up the fact that the Jyske Bank Group has committed fraud crimes against the Jyske bank’s own customers.
This page is about Denmark being largely controlled by corrupt lawyers as Lundgrens, and criminal banks as Jyske Bank, and incompetent judges like Kurt Rasmussen who chose to cover up the crime of the powerful friends, it started 17 May 2016, where I first wrote directly to Jyske Bank Anders Christian Dam, and wrote I think I am exposed to a huge fraud, it should turn out that I was right, but that also the management of Jyske bank want the bank to deceive the customers the bank could I did not know, this little battle has developed to promote information that the Danish state by cooperating with criminal banks, and that the state covers this matter, by counteracting the victim of banks’ crime can get help, and that I as a victim of organized crime in Denmark myself must fight this unequal struggle, against this Danish bank which the Danish state and the authorities as well as the government cover.
A Facebook post from 28-01-2022. with warning against Danish companies.
☺

Is it a criminal offense for the Danish state to cover up a criminal Danish bank’s, or is it completely normal in Denmark.
😁
📣

It is unhealthy for the Danish government that the state allows banks to commit crime, and covers it.

Is it a criminal offense for the Danish state to cover up a criminal Danish bank’s, or is it completely normal in Denmark.

Danmarks nok største svindler, uden tvivl Jyske Bank.

Jyske Bank Helsingør.

Rettet 31-07-2021.
Lundgrens NIELS GRAM-HANSSEN. 💰.
Watch the Danish attorneys and banks, as there is evidence of organized crime, bribery and corruption in some of the largest danish companies, which try to stop the customer, who caught the Jyske Bank Group in gross fraud.
You as a journalist, who stumbles across this page, Banking – News. you may wonder if what I write is true, but of course I guarantee that this is the truth, what I write about the organized crime in Denmark, that the Danish authorities know about, but cover over, by making excuses for not investigating the crime of Danish banks.
Do you want a exclusive true story, about danish banks’ use of fraud, and document false, corruption and bribery, among the largest danish banks as Jyske Bank by CEO Anders Christian Dam Danish law firms as Lundgrens lawyers and Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers, then you should check this page out.
Do you have any questions, please contact me, by text message at.
Phone +4522227713.
You can find me here on my facebook profile.
Best regards Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup
Soevej 5. 3100. Hornbaek.
Denmark. DK.
📢
Warning. Hvor mange korupte advokater findes der i Lundgrens advokat partnerselskab, som vil skade deres klienters økonomiske interesser, og undergrave klientens økonomi for at dække over andre klienters bedrageri, som her hvor Lundgrens ved deres advokaters I-Loyale handlinger, dækker over Jyske Bank A/S kriminelle handlinger.
Læs testen og de delte links, så ser du at der i Lundgrens advokat firma, findes et hav af inhabile og Iloyale advokater, hvorfor du advares imod at stole på Lundgrens advokater, altså med minder du allerede er kriminel.
Findes der medlemmer i advokat nævnet, som er ansatte eller partnere i Lundgrens advokater.
og / eller.
Lund Elmer Sandager advokater, og hvilke bestyrelser sidder de i.
Og hvor højt oppe i samfundet, finder vi de korrupte advokat virksomheder.
But why would the lawyer board, cover corrupt, incompetent and disloyal Danish lawyers, who cover crime committed by Danish banks.
Where several lawyer companies are involved, Lundgren’s lawyers and Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers mention here, but there may well be more.
How big is the group of the many people that cover fraudulent businesses in denmark.
If you are looking for a job, or collaboration as a finance business partner with the largest banks.
Read more on BANKING NEWS. here you will find some of the best stock trades that you should refrain from.
Findes der medlemmer i advokat nævnet, som er ansatte eller partnere i Lundgrens advokater.
og / eller.
Lund Elmer Sandager advokater.
Hvorfor nævnet ikke ønsker at bringe smuds frem om disse advokatvirksomheder, og Advokat nævnet derfor frikender virksomheder for overtrædelse af god advokatskik, hvor egne medlemmer er ansat eller partnere, eller blot venskaber til.
Har nogle af nævnets medlemmer kontakt eller berøring med Jysk Bank A/S ? du kan jo selv se efter, måske nogle af de virksomheder medlemmerne kommer fra laver bankforretninger med Jyske Bank A/S
Når tidligere klient, i Lundgrens advokater.
I 2018 og 2019. Bad Lundgrens fremlægge over for domstolen, at Jyske Bank A/S står bag brugen af svig forretninger, og falsk. (altså dokumentfalsk.)
ER DET SÅ IKKE KLIENTEN DET BESTEMMER, nej ikke efter afgørelsen 2020-1932. 30-06-2021. En afgørelse der iøvrigt har præjudikat virkning på fremtidig klager, med samme klage forhold.
SELV OM ADVOKATNÆVNET SKRIVER AT KLIENTEN INTET BESTEMMER, SÅ ER BESTIKKELSE ALTSÅ IKKE IORDEN.
NÅR DETTE OPSLAG MED LINKS TIL BANKNYT, DELES, ER DET EN ADVARSEL MOD LUNDGRENS ADVOKAT PARTNERSELSKAB, og MOD LUND ELMER SANDAGER ADVOKATER OG IKKE MINDST EN ADVARSEL MOD DANMARKS NOK STØRSTE KRIMINELLE BANK. JYSKE BANK A/S
Da NIELS GRAM-HANSSEN indgik en for Lundgrens advokater, stor million aftale med Jyske Bank A/S i en ejendoms handel til omkring 600 millioner danske kroner, var der reelt tale bestikkelse, som var skjult som returkommission.
Dette million sammenarbejde mellem Lundgrens advokater og Jyske Bank A/S lykkedes det for de mange Lundgrens ansatte, at skjule overfor klienten, frem til 21. September 2019.
Hvor klienten opdager at Lundgrens advokater har en betydelig økonomisk interesse med Jyske Bank.
Klienten der ansatte Lundgrens advokater til at fremlægge en større svig og falsk sag imod Jyske Bank A/S, kan naturligvis ikke have et advokat firma, der sandsynligvis er korupte, og som nægter at svare klienten.
Og samtidig har Lundgrens bevidst og uhæderligt holdt klienten ude af sagen.
Det lykkedes for Lundgrens advokater at skjule et af sagsøgtes Processkrift C. overfor klienten.
Samt at skjule overfor klienten, at Lundgrens advokat har fjernet klientens forklaring, klagens BILAG 62. LINK. Og BILAG 63.BILAG.
Deslige fjerner Lundgrens Bilag’s listen, og indsætter de bilag som Lundgrens ønsker, samtidens med at Lundgrens advokater overtræder deres tavshedspligt, da Lundgrens deler flere navne, som klienten ønsker skjult.
Når du som klient har behov for advokat bistand, for at få fremlagt din sag.
Og skal finde en hæderlig, ærlig, habil, troværdig, loyal advokat, så skal du vide at du ikke kan stole på nogle af Danmarks største advokatfirmaer.
For når de største danske advokatvirksomheder, samtidig med advokat firmaet er blevet ansat, til for dig at fremlægge som her, en svig sag mod en sagsøgt Jyske Bank A/S.
Og så advokat firmaet vælger direkte at ændre i “dine” klientens anbringer, og fjerne dine vidner, kort sagt pille din sag fra hinanden.
Og det samtidig med at andre advokater fra samme “Lundgrens” advokatkontor, af Jyske Bank bliver betalt millioner af kroner, for at yde rådgivning til den samme juridiske klient.
Jyske Bank A/S
Selv om klager og klient ansatte advokat Lundgrens advokat firma til, netop at fremlægge flere svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S.
Så har advokatnævnet besluttet at, advokatvirksomheder gerne må bistå samme klient Jyske Bank A/S, i en anden sag til mange millioner kroner.
Selv om at advokaten, så ikke fremlægge nogle af klientens svig og falsk anbringer mod samme sagsøgte Jyske Bank A/S
Deslige med klienten 23-10-2019. Har opdaget at Lundgrens den 02-09-2019. Har ændret klientens afgørende påstand. AT SAGENS BILAG 1. ER PÅSTÅET FALSK, er ikke til hinder for at LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER. ÆNDRE KLIENTENS ANBRINGER.
Klienten har kontinuerligt siden Lundgrens advokater blev ansat efter 30. Januar 2018, nedlagt påstand om at Sagens Bilag 1. Swap W015785. en rente bytte på 4.328.000 DKK er Falsk.
Swappen er ikke aftalt, den er ikke underskrevet, på trods af Jyske Bank koncernen, i dokument 16-07-2008. Og så. 24-07-2008 LINK. Og igen 30-07-2008 LINK. Har forsøgt at få kunden til at indgå den rente bytte med Jyske Bank A/S, såfremt at sagsøger og kunden vælger at optage det tilbudte underlæggende lån, der kunne rentebyttes.
Lundgrens skulle fremlægge at Jyske Bank har løjet overfor kunden, og at Jyske Bank ved Lund Elmer Sandager, (der hvor advokatnævnets, medlem Henrik Høpner også er partner.) At Lund Elmer Sandager gentagne har fremlagt falske oplysninger over for domstolen, og har løjet at dette for swappen underliggende lån var optaget, som Nicolai Hansen og Casper Dam Olsen her skriver. 2010 LINK. Og for domstolen også af Philip Baruch er blevet påstået omlagt, BILAG D. LINK, se side 2. Omlagt / ændre det bagvedliggende lån.
10/10-2018. Sagen er ændret til en svig og falsk sag. Lundgrens advokater svare aldrig på nogle mail. Omkring klientens anbringener.
Deler lidt af de i 5/6-2019. klagens fremlagte dokumenter.
Klientens påstande 06-12-2018- Bilag 40
8/7-2019. Bekræfter Emil Hald Vendelbo Winstrøm fra Lundgrens advokater, telefonisk, at forstå klientens anbringer.
Hør samtalen her DEL 1. LINK. &. DEL 2. LINK.
Lundgrens ansatte bekræfter 8/7-2019. Afskrivning af samtale med Emil Hald Vendelbo.
At have forstået at klientens anbringer mod Jyske Bank koncernen, er svig, og at sagens Bilag 1. Swappen W015785. fra 16-07-2008. Påstår klienten er falsk.
Den ansatte assisterende advokat Emil Hald ved Lundgrens, lover 8/7-2019. ikke at fremlægge nogle, uden at klienten er fuldstændig enige, hvilket Lundgrens advokater alligevel gør 2/9-2019, hvilket Lundgrens advokater så skjulte over for klienten, så har advokatnævnet vedtaget at dette ikke er en overtrædelse af god advokat skik.
Så når Lundgrens, uden klientens godkendelse, uden at medtage Klientens påstande, og direkte ændre klientens påstande, hvilket Lundgrens advokater i Ond Tro fremlagde i Processkrift 2/9-2019. Som værende klientens påstande, hvilke Processkrift Lundgrens advokater deslige nægter at udlevere klienten en kopi af, selv efter Klientens anmodning 5/9-2019.
Så når klienten 5/9. 2019. Spørger Lundgrens advokater, efter en kopi af Processkrift 2. Fra 2/9-2019. Og Lundgrens advokater ved partner Dan Terkildsen ikke ud levere en kopi.
Så har advokatnævnet 30/6-2021. Afgjort at heller ikke dette er ikke en overtrædelse af god advokat skik.
Klienten skriver ved BILAG 106. 11/8-2019. AT SWAPPEN 16-07-2008 PÅSTÅS FALSK.
12/8-2019. Klientens påstande.
21/8-2019. Klientens påstande.
23/8-2019. Klientens påstande.
27-08-2019. BILAG 115. Klientens påstande.
30/8-2019. Klientens påstande.
30/8-2019. gentager påstande om svig og gentager vidner
Lundgrens fremlægger 2/9-2019. Processkrift 2.
som ikke er det klienten ansatte Lundgrens advokater til at fremlægge.
BEMÆRK. LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER HAR BLOT FREMLAGT, AT DER IKKE FINDES NOGET LÅN. BILAG er fra klagen LINK.
Og derudover fremlægger Lundgrens advokater mod klientens påstande, at klienten har godkendt og indtrådt den swap W015785. Som klienten, kontinuerligt har påstået er falsk.
Når Lundgrens advokater ændre klientens anbringer omkring at Swappen af 16-07-2008. W015785. Som klienten påstår er falsk.
Til at Swappen W015785. er blevet aftalt og godkendt. Se Processkrift 2. Som Lundgrens advokater 2 september har fremlagt.
Og et Processkrift som Dan Terkildsen, heller ikke vil udlevere klienten en kopi af.
Og det selv om klienten 5/9-2019. Anmoder Dan Terkildsen om en kopi.
Dette ændrede Lundgrens til at, klienten har 16-07-2008. Indgået swappen med Jyske Bank. Se hele Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019. Hvilket Lundgrens advokater bevidst og uhæderligt skjuler overfor klienten, for at hjælpe sagsøgte Jyske Bank, der også er klient i LUNDGRENS ADVOKATER.
Denne måde som groft har tilsidesat deres klients påstande blev fremlagt og mere til, har advokat nævnet 30-06-2021. Afgjort ikke er overtrædelser af god advokat skik.
Hvilket også er fremlagt i klagen 2020-1932. Grundlovsdag 2020 over Lundgrens advokater.
Og med klientens primære påstand, som startet LINK. 30 november 2018. hvor klienten beder Lundgrens hjælpe med en sag, med flere svig forhold mod Jyske Bank. sagens Bilag 1. Swappen af 16-07-2008. Er falsk.
Er der intet at misforstå.
Da Lundgrens valgte at takke ja tak til Jyske Banks tilbud om sammenarbejde.
Var Lundgrens advokater ved partner Dan Terkildsen, allerede få uger tidligere blevet antaget, til at fremlægge en betydelig svindel sag mod samme sagsøgte Jyske Bank A/S
Det lykkedes for Lundgrens advokater hvor flere medarbejdere, mindst ved Mette Marie Nielsen, Emil Hald Vendelbo Winstrøm, Pernille Hellesøe, Sebastian Lysholm Nielsen, Jens Grunnet-Nilsson, Karoline Stampe Eriksen og Dan Terkildsen i en eller anden form, at sørge for at manipulere med klientens svig og falsk anbringer.
Og både uhæderligt og iloyalt, at modarbejde klientens påstande mod Jyske Bank koncernen for brugen af svig og falsk blev fremlagt for domstolen.
Klienten har indbragt Lundgrens advokater for at være iloyale og korupte, og for at Lundgrens har modarbejde klientens retssikkerhed, for at ville tabe sagen.
Når Jyske Bank A/S så efterfølgende har bestukket Lundgrens advokater, skjult som returkommission, for at Lundgrens advokater skulle sørger for at klientens svig og falsk påstande mod Jyske Bank A/S aldrig bliver fremlagt, men blot at ændre klientens svig påstande, og i stedet fremlægge at klienten har fået dårlig rådgivning, dette gjorde Lundgrens for at ville tabe sagen mod Jyske Bank, og for at skuffe i retsforhold.
Lundgrens advokater fortalte ved Dan Terkildsen 13-08-2019. Link med mail 20-09-2019, hvor klienten spørger om Lundgrens advokater har arbejdet for Jyske Bank, hvilket Lundgrens advokater ikke vil svare på. Så når Dan Terkildsen sagde at det var ikke nødvendigt at fremlægge nogle af de mange svig og falsk forhold, som Jyske Bank har udsat deres kunde for, er grunden naturligvis at Jyske Bank koncernen har bestukket Lundgrens advokater.
Dan Terkildsen siger også at det kan man tage de nasty ting under fremlæggelsen.
Dan Terkildsen som siger efter at have læst de af klientens kontinuerligt fremlagt påstande, som her
LINK. 11-08-2019. Med LINK 12-08-2019.
og 13-08-2019. Samt igen LINK 18-08-2019. at Swappen W015785. af 16-07-2008 er falsk. og frembragt ved svig.
Dan Terkildsen har til dette møde 13-08-2019. tager Jens Grunnet-Nilsson og Emil Hald Vendelbo Winstrøm med, disse skal formentligt lære at manipulere Lundgrens klienter, ligesom Dan Terkildsen selv gør det.
Lundgrens ansatte der gentagne gange har fået fremlagt klientens anbringer, som også 27-08-2019. og der med henvisning til beviserne mod Jyske Bank A/S for brugen af svig falsk og ond tro.
Hvilket Lundgrens advokater af Jyske Bank koncernen ved returkommission, er blevet betalt for at få fjernet i klientens anbringer mod Jyske Bank A/S.
Når Lundgrens advokater, har fået flere instrukser om, intet at fremlægge uden at klienten har godkendt det som fremlægges for domstolen, så er det for at sikker klientens retssikkerhed.
Klienten ved ikke på dette tidspunkt at Lundgrens advokater er korrupte, hvilket først opdages LINK. 21 september 2019.
Direkte imod klientens anbringen, fremlægger Lundgrens advokater 2. September, det stik modsatte af hvad Klienten skriver.
Når Lundgrens advokater 2. September 2019. Skriver i Processkrift 2. LINK.
At klienten 16-07-2008. har indgået en swapaftale W015785. på 4.328.000 DKK med Jyske Bank.
Så er det i direkte modstrid med klientens anbringen, der er skrevet kontinuerligt til Lundgrens, som 13-08-2019. Og så her igen LINK. den 18-08-2019. Hvor klienten igen påstår Bilag 1. W015785. 16-07-2008. ER FALSK
LINK. sms 23-08-2019 intet må fremlægges uden klientens godkendelse.
LINK. mail med påstand 27-08-2019, og skriver at intet må fremlægges uden klientens godkendelse.
Så når de iloyale Lundgrens advokater i Processkrift 2. 02-09-2019. Direkte imod klientens påstande, fremlægger noget andet, har fjernet klientens vidner og derefter ikke vil udlevere klienten en kopi af Processkrift 2. September 2019. Og det på trods af at klienten LINK. 05-09-2019. Der anmoder Dan Terkildsen om en kopi af LINK. Processkrift 2.
Så svare Lundgrens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen slet ikke, på denne anmodning.
Lundgrens svarer heller ikke på LINK. mailen 20-09-2019. Om Lundgrens advokater arbejder for Jyske Bank, der afholdes et møde i Lundgrens, hvor Dan Terkildsen bestemmer at klienten ikke har krav på noget svar, og Lundgrens fakturere klienten for at spørger.
Når så advokat nævnet sag. 2020-1932. i klage afgørelsen 30-07-2021. afviser alle klager mod Lundgrens advokater og Dan Terkildsen, så kan det næppe betale sig at klage over advokater fra Danmarks største advokatfirmaer, da advokatnævnet har fastsat reglerne for, hvad advokat nævnet giver deres medlemmer lov til, et udsnit står længere nede.
At advokat nævnet har Henrik Høpner som medlem, og Henrik Høpner er partner med Philip Baruch på samme advokat kontor hvor Lund Elmer Sandager gentagne gange har fremlagt falske oplysninger over for domstolen, så er det meget tænkeligt at advokat nævnet ikke selv er habile, men ønsker at holde hånden over de advokat virksomheder, som nævnets medlemmer selv er partner i.
Det er den danske elite, hvis medlemmer der dækker over andre kriminelle medlemmer, og derved er til hinder for at korrupte advokater, som Lundgrens advokat partnerselskab bliver stillet til ansvar, ligesom de løgnagtige Lund Elmer Sandager advokater, hvor Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen og Philip Baruch har dækket over Jyske Banks mange svig og falsk forbrydelser.
Når Lundgrens advokater skulle fremlægge at Partner Philip Baruch fra Lund Elmer Sandager, gentagne gange har fremlagt falske oplysninger overfor domstolen for at skuffe i retsforhold, som det ses i klagens Bilag. brevet 1 febuar 2019. LINK. Og Lundgrens advokater mod klientens instrukser ikke fremlagde nogle af klientens anbringer
Det bliver meget tydeligt, at Advokat nævnets medlem Henrik Høpner, der også er advokat i Lund Elmer Sandager advokater, hvor Henrik Høpner er partner i Lund Elmer Sandager advokater, der er kraftigt involveret, eller direkte indblandet i Jyske Banks million svindel, altså i den svig og falsk sag mod Jyske Bank A/S som Lundgrens advokater var ansat til at fremlægge, men hvor Lundgrens advokater desværre valgte at tage mod bestikkelse / returkommission fra Jyske Bank koncernen, mod ikke at fremlægge nogle af klientens påstande og anbringer mod Jyske Bank A/S
Advokat nævnet kan ikke have læst eller sat sig ind i hele klagen.
Når advokatnævnet skriver at
NÆVNET HAR LAGT VÆGT PÅ.
At Lundgrens advokater blev fyret, efter at sagen var berammet til hovedforhandling, da Lundgrens 24 september 2019. blev fyret.
Dette er faktuelt forkert.
Fra 5 september 2019. Og frem til klienten 21. September 2019. Hvor klienten opdager at Lundgrens advokater med stor sandsynlighed er iloyale og korrupte, og til Lundgrens advokater bliver fyret 24. September, sagen var altså ikke berammet, da Lundgrens advokater, og Dan Terkildsen blev fyret.
Sagen’s faktiske forhold i klientens sag, hvilket Lundgrens blev ansat til at fremlægge.
Fremlægges først 4 maj 2020. Processkrift 3. Da klienten skulle prøve at finde en hæderlig advokat, blandt advokat samfundets medlemmer, og der findes tydeligt vis ikke hæderlige advokater i Hellerup ved Lundgrens advokat partnerselskab.
Og sagen berammes først 3 december 2020.
Sagens anbringer fremlægges ved yderligere et Processkrift 4. 23 december 2020. Og suppleres med et Processkrift 5.
Med nævnets afgørelse, hvor klagens 27 klagepunkter. Og de ubesvarede 26 opfordringer. Til Lundgrens advokaterr, som advokat nævnet samlet afviser, hermed fastlægger advokat nævnet nye og faste retningslinjer, for hvad en advokat må, og hvornår der er en overtrædelse af god advokat skik, eller de advokatetiske regler.
Denne afvisning af klagen.
Har stor betydning for alle de danske advokater, som nu kan henvise til denne her afgørelse, for hvad danske advokater må i henhold til advokatnævnet.
Hvilket skal deles med landets advokater.
Og som Advokat nævnet selv bør skrive i advokat samfundets artikler.
Du kan som klient til de danske advokater, ikke stole blindt på nogle af de store danske advokatvirksomheder, det er hvad Danskerne må acceptere efter advokat nævnets medlemmer har afvist alle 27 klage punkter over Lundgrens advokater.
ET STORT PROBLEM FOR KLIENTENS TILLID TIL DANSKE ADVOKATVIRKSOMHEDER.
Efter advokatnævnets afgørelse, på klagen over Lundgrens advokat og partner Dan Terkildsen.
Giver advokatsamfundet de danske advokater, ret til i vidt omfang selv ret til at bestemme hvad der skal fremlægges, og hvem der skal vidne.
Advokat nævnet skriver desuden. Der må indrømmes en advokat betydelig rammer.
Altså en advokat må gøre hvad Advokaten selv vil, og ikke hvad klienten har ansat advokaten til.
Når advokatnævnet med medlemmer, der er placeret i store advokatvirksomheder, har besluttet for advokatnævnet, at det ikke er klienten selv som bestemmer, men alene advokaten, som klienten har ansat der bestemmer alt, bør du undgå disse advokater, jeg har været smadder heldig at kunne finde en advokat som er hæderlig og ærlig, hvilket er ret svært at finde.
Det er ikke klienten som bestemmer over sin egen sag, men alene advokaten.
Er at:
Advokater behøver ikke at svare klienten.
.
Advokater behøver ikke dele sagsøgers processkrifter, med klienten.
.
Advokater behøver ikke dele sagsøgte’s processkrifter, med klienten.
.
Advokater behøver ikke at dele retsbøger med klienten.
.
Advokater må gene ændre klientens anbringer, også uden at oplyse klienten noget om det.
.
Advokater må gerne indkalde andre vidner end dem klienten har sagt, uden at oplyse klienten noget om det.
.
Advokater må gerne indkalde andre vidner, uden at oplyse klienten noget om det.
.
Advokater må gerne vildlede klienten.
.
Advokater må gerne lave Bilag’s rod.
.
Advokater må gerne skrive taxa regning på en klient, selv om det ikke vedrører klienten.
.
Advokater må gerne tage betaling for opgaver der ikke er udført.
Kort sagt, advokat nævnet / advokat samfundet, har 30 juni 2021. besluttet ved 5 medlemmer af advokat nævnet.
At klienten ikke selv kan bestemme over, hvad klientens påstande mod en sagsøgt handler om, det er alene advokaten som fuldt ud selv bestemmer.
DÆKKER ADVOKATNÆVNET OVER KORRUPTE OG ILOYALE ADVOKATER, DER ER MEDLEMMER AF ADVOKATSAMFUNDET.
Formoder da at alle medlemmerne af advokatnævnet er helt enig i, at det alene er en klients advokat der bestemmer, og ikke klienten. Nævnet bør være klar til at besvare henvendelser, når de og medlemmerne orienteres om konsekvenserne af afgørelsen, der er til stor skade for klienterne retsstilling, og er en afgørelse der er til skade for den enkelte danskers retssikkerhed.
Her ved Formandskabet.
Højesteretsdommer Kurt Rasmussen (formand). /
Landsdommer Mikael Sjöberg, Østre Landsret (næstformand). /
Dommer Ole Høyer, Retten i Aalborg (næstformand). /
&
HER KAN DU LÆSE MERE OM NÆVNETS MEDLEMMER:
Om de medlemmer der er udpeget af justitsministeren, også er helt enig i at det er advokaterne som alene, og helt suverænt bestemmer over hvad klientens påstande og anbringer er, og at disse advokater derfor ikke behøver at svare klienten, eller delagtiggøre klienten i hvad advokaten agter at fremlægge, og uden fuldmagt må ænder i alt det klienten vil have fremlagt, og gerne må nægte at udlevere Processkrifter til klienten.
Seniorkonsulent og næstformand Per Jensen, Forbrugerrådet Tænk. – .
2. viceborgmester Henrik Rønnow, Kommunernes Landsforening. -.
Markedsdirektør Henrik Hyltoft, Dansk Erhverv. -.
Regionsrådsmedlem Kristian Nørgaard, Region Syddanmark. -.
Juridisk konsulent Thea Lyskov Søndergaard, SMV Danmark. -.
Kontorchef Anita Hørby, Social- og Indenrigsministeriet. -.
Fagleder Morten Qvist Fog, Dansk Industri. -.
Seniorjurist Maria Liljeqvist, Forbrugerrådet Tænk. -.
&.
De medlemmer der er valgt af Advokatsamfundet, er de også alle sammen enige med, advokatnævnets afgørelse, at det er advokaterne som bestemmer suverænt over hvad klientens påstande er, uanset at det er en krænkelse af klientens retssikkerhed. ? :
Advokat Birgitte Frølund, Hellerup. Horten advokater. – bruger Jyske Bank A/S.
Advokat Henrik Høpner, København. Lund Elmer Sandager. – bruger Jyske Bank A/S.
Advokat Linda Hebo Lange, Holbæk. Herbst Thoregaard & Lange Advokater. – bruger Jyske Bank A/S.
Advokat Anders Quistgaard, Odense. Quistgaard Advokatfirma. –
Advokat Lars Lindencrone Petersen, København. Bech Bruun advokater. –
Advokat Jens Steen Jensen, København. Kromann Reumert advokater. – bruger Jyske Bank A/S.
Advokat Gert Dyrn, Fredericia. Stage advokatfirma. –
Advokat Søren Vasegaard Andreasen, Auning. paragrafadvokaterne. –
Advokat Lars Kaasgaard, Viborg. Leoni Advokater. – bruger Jyske Bank A/S.
Og også
Om Advokatnævnets stedfortrædere:
Alle er enige i at afvise klagen over Lundgrens advokater, klagen er vel begrundet, og dokumenteret, kan de samlede medlemmer jo samlet tage stilling til.
Højesteretsdommer Jan Schans Christensen. –
Landsdommer Dorte Jensen. Dommer Mette Søgaard Vammen. –
Advokat Anne Sophie Vilsbøll. –
Advokat Maryla Wroblewski. –
Advokat Pernille Bergholt Buhl. –
Advokat Steffen Nielsen. –
Advokat Lotte Lindahl Andreasen. –
Advokat Jacob Pinborg. –
Advokat Carsten Pedersen. –
Advokat Erik Østergaard-Nielsen. –
Advokat Peter Fogh. –
Advokat Ulrika Folkmann-Schjerbeck. –
Advokat Michael Meyn. –
Advokat Jens Jørgen Viuff. –
Advokat Jonna Hjeds. –
Advokat Johan Johnsen. –
Advokat Lars Rieck Sørensen. –
Advokat Tina Bach. –
Advokat Lene Brun. –
Direktør Morten Frihagen. –
Seniorjurist Jakob Steenstrup. –
Statsaut. revisor Søren Skov Larsen. –
Seniorchef konsulent Lars Frolov-Hammer. –
Byrådsmedlem Lone Ravn. –
Chefkonsulent Ole Sellmer Sørensen. –
Jurist Anne Dehn Jeppesen Byrådsmedlem Thyge Nielsen. –
Om alle disse nævnte fra advokatnævnet, så alle sammen er enige, i at Lundgrens advokater ved deres partner Dan Terkildsen og ansatte i øvrigt ikke har overtrådt nogle af de advokat etiske regler. ?.
Da kun 5 af disse medlemmer har besluttet at for advoknævnet at afvise alle klagepunkter.
Ville det være interessant at vide hvem de er, og om også de øvrige medlemmer er helt enige, da afgørelsen giver de danske advokater ret til at modarbejde klientens påstande mod en sagsøgt bliver fremlagt i domstolen.
I afgørelsen at det ikke er klienten som bestemmer over sin egen sag, det gør alene advokaten, som ikke behøver at inddrage klienten, i hvad advokaten foretager sig.
Alt dette må du spørge advokatsamfundet om.
Advokatnævnets afgørelse som har præjudikat virkning for andre klager med samme klage forhold, og åbner nemlig betydelig muligheder, for at advokater, frit kan tage mod bestikkelse under dække som returkommission, for at modarbejde deres egen klienter, ved intet at fremlægge, men bevidst og uærligt kan modarbejde klienten, ændrer i klientens påstande, for at skade klientens sag, der her mindst kan sætte danmarks anden største bank, Jyske Bank under skærpet tilsyn, for at lave dokumentfalsk og bedrageri, hvilket Lundgrens advokater skulle fremlægge som brug af svig og falsk.
Man kan vel godt sige at Jyske Bank har lavet undergravende virksomhed ,for at kunne tage deres kundes private ejendom og udlejningsejendom, selv kundens hjemmesider som denne her, ville Jyske Bank have da banken ved Casper Dam Olsen ved et grin satte fingeren hvor kunden var blevet afkrevet en underskrift.
Og sagde se jeg har også taget pant i dine domæner, Casper Dam nærmest grinede af kunden som var svækket efter sin livstruende sygdom, eller hvad en hjerneblødning på 2,5 cm er betegnet som.
Kort efter sender Anette Kirkeby kunden med sin bemærkning.
Nu er du også blevet en dårlig kunde.
Kunden som ikke ved at Jyske Bank, har udsat ham for million svindel, ved hjælp af dokumentetfalsk, bliver sendt til afvikling ved den grønne slagter i Silkeborg.
Hvor Birgit Buch Thuesen står klar med yderligere krav, og nægter iøvrigt kunden at tage advokat forbehold.